1TV — Bolshaya igra
20261102 200000 UTC
634 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:02] his hands is the executive branch and law enforcement agencies, and
[00:00:05] accordingly, at stake for him will be the Middle East settlement, how to
[00:00:09] act in the Ukrainian conflict, what to choose
[00:00:12] so as not to change his principles, to move on,
[00:00:16] like a lame duck, as many political scientists today
[00:00:19] suggest. Trump actually
[00:00:23] stated that he will not be a lame duck, and
[00:00:27] although he hopes for good results for Republicans
[00:00:31] in tomorrow's midterm elections, he spoke about what
[00:00:34] he will do, how he will use his veto if Democrats
[00:00:38] seize control of both or even just one
[00:00:46] If that happens, I think I will become Mr. Veto, I will not let them
[00:00:50] govern, then at some point we will probably start making deals.
[00:00:54] This has happened before. The Senate or the House of Representatives sends
[00:00:57] bills, they are subjected to vetoes.
[00:02:14] how big will
[00:02:17] the majority be, I apologize for the tautology, of Democrats in the House
[00:02:21] of Representatives.
[00:02:24] hopes that this will be a very
[00:02:27] large advantage as... it
[00:02:30] happened during Trump's first term, when
[00:02:33] Democrats gained, yes,
[00:02:36] in 2018, they gained an additional 41 seats, meaning they
[00:02:40] gained 41 seats, predominantly 41
[00:02:44] votes ahead of Republicans,
[00:02:46] today they say that they can gain
[00:02:50] an advantage of five to 20
[00:02:52] votes,
[00:02:55] but if five, it's a rather shaky situation,
[00:02:59] if 20... a little more, more
[00:03:02] stable construction, but in principle, it's not
[00:03:05] psychologically, it won't be such a rout
[00:03:08] as the 2018 elections
[00:03:12] were for Trump himself. This is regarding the House
[00:03:15] of Representatives, as for the Senate,
[00:03:18] there is no clarity
[00:03:22] here until the last moment. Let's
[00:03:25] see what analysis of public opinion
[00:03:29] polls New York Times gives for the Senate. They
[00:03:32] talk about seven states:
[00:03:35] Michigan, Texas, Maine,
[00:03:38] Ohio, Kansas, Alaska,
[00:03:41] Iowa, these are battleground
[00:03:45] States. Some of these states should not be
[00:03:48] Battleground States, that is, states for which there will be a real
[00:03:51] fight. For example, in Texas,
[00:03:55] I believe for 20 years, they haven't elected a Democrat
[00:03:58] for the...
[00:04:30] today Republicans have 53
[00:04:33] seats in Congress, in
[00:04:35] the Senate, Democrats have
[00:04:39] 47, so they need to gain
[00:04:42] five votes, if they don't gain four, then the situation
[00:04:45] is 50/50, and here Vice President
[00:04:49] Pence, as Chairman of the Senate, has
[00:04:53] the right to cast his vote into
[00:04:56] one basket or another, I think, I think they only need four, because...
[00:05:43] pay very much to very good lawyers, so there are
[00:05:47] numerous loopholes that the administration will use
[00:05:51] in order to somehow neutralize
[00:05:54] the advantage that Democrats gain
[00:05:57] in the Supreme Court, in the composition of the Supreme Court, they have
[00:06:00] advantages in the Supreme Court, but besides the Supreme Court, there's
[00:06:04] another thing, ordinary
[00:06:07] courts in the United States can challenge certain
[00:06:10] presidential decrees, certain actions of the executive
[00:06:13] branch, so this is another direction, so
[00:06:17] the struggle will be tough, the struggle will be long,
[00:06:21] an attempt at impeachment is not
[00:06:24] excluded, but it is clear in advance that impeachment will not
[00:06:28] lead to the removal of the president from power, or
[00:06:32] his ministers, well, for example, against
[00:06:35] Secretary of Defense Mattis,
[00:06:38] they are going to
[00:06:41] indict him in order to remove
[00:06:44] him from office, I think neither of those
[00:06:48] will work out, but at least,
[00:06:51] they will be able to cause a lot of trouble, I mean
[00:06:55] the Democrats, in relation to
[00:06:57] the administration, and it can take
[00:07:00] a lot of President Trump's time, but - still
[00:07:04] returning to your initial
[00:07:08] thesis, Trump will not, will definitely not
[00:07:11] become lame. He will work
[00:07:15] on the domestic front, although it will be harder for him,
[00:07:19] but the victory
[00:07:21] of his political opponents will relatively little
[00:07:25] restrict him in foreign policy,
[00:07:27] there he, as president, head of state and
[00:07:31] the country's chief diplomat, can act
[00:07:34] quite proactively, quite actively, but having said
[00:07:38] that, I don't think Trump will limit himself to foreign
[00:07:41] policy. because for him, well, say, the 2026
[00:07:45] elections, we practically already understand how they
[00:07:48] will come to approximately what result,
[00:07:51] and the main prize now is the 2028 elections, what
[00:07:54] political legacy will Trump leave? And for Trump,
[00:07:58] it is extremely important that his successor be
[00:08:01] a Republican candidate, he has not yet decided if it will be Rubio,
[00:08:05] if it will be Vance, but it must be a Republican, in that
[00:08:09] case Trump can emerge victorious.
[00:10:12] I just want to say that your analysis
[00:10:16] is absolutely correct, under
[00:10:19] minimally normal circumstances, but if
[00:10:22] Trump starts a new war.
[00:10:35] Well, if you look at what is happening in the Middle
[00:10:39] East right now,
[00:10:41] then, well, more likely yes than no, because
[00:10:45] flying
[00:10:47] planes, bringing in ships,
[00:10:51] well, in general, it's quite such
[00:10:55] an expensive operation, and
[00:10:58] I don't think it's done solely to put the Iranians
[00:11:02] on the spot, moreover, the Prime Minister
[00:11:06] of Israel constantly
[00:11:09] calls, at least he talks about it, with the
[00:11:12] President of America, and
[00:11:15] incites him to the next round of war, for
[00:11:18] Netanyahu,
[00:11:21] a new round of struggle with Iran, a new round...
[00:12:25] to do something decisive with Iran means victory
[00:12:29] for Iran, although victory as always will be bought at a high
[00:12:47] Under pressure from the Israeli prime minister, the Trump administration is just days
[00:12:51] away from a nuclear strike on Iran. The target will be Mount
[00:12:54] Pikaks in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims
[00:12:57] the Iranian government has resumed nuclear fuel enrichment. No
[00:13:01] conventional weapon in the American arsenal is capable of penetrating 300 feet
[00:13:05] of solid granite. The only military option is a nuclear strike.
[00:13:08] Netanyahu is relentlessly pushing for it. "Bibi calls Trump about this every
[00:13:12] day," says my informed source. Netanyahu is exerting
[00:13:15] maximum pressure on his closest allies in the administration, including
[00:13:19] Secretary of War Mattis and CENTCOM Commander Cooper.
[00:13:21] Secretary of State Rubio and CIA Director Radcliffe are also following Netanyahu,
[00:13:25] as a leader of the Democratic Party. Sources report that Trump will likely
[00:13:29] make a decision by next weekend. To his credit, he is wavering. At
[00:13:33] the moment, Trump is listening to his Vice President Pence and his friend
[00:13:37] Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue that a deal with Iran
[00:13:40] is possible, and they are right, although it won't be easy. Well,
[00:13:44] for me, the idea that at this stage Trump
[00:13:48] will use nuclear weapons against Iran is somewhere on the
[00:13:51] verge of madness. This is Trump too.
[00:14:25] this question comes up from time to time, then it goes somewhere to the side, then it comes up again.
[00:14:28] This is another time this
[00:14:32] question has come up.
[00:14:34] I
[00:14:37] would still
[00:14:40] hope that
[00:14:43] this option will be put aside
[00:14:46] once again, because
[00:14:50] whatever the result
[00:14:52] of the use
[00:14:56] of nuclear weapons, the United States
[00:14:59] will not end the Iranian nuclear
[00:15:03] program this way, they can actually accelerate it. In fact, to
[00:15:06] this day, Iran is ready
[00:15:09] to remain within the framework of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation
[00:15:13] Treaty, although, as you know, after the American-Israeli
[00:15:16] aggression, there were talks about
[00:15:20] creating their own nuclear weapons, withdrawing from the treaty, and so on. As of
[00:15:24] today, the Iranian leadership states that they
[00:15:27] are ready to remain within the framework of the treaty and not
[00:15:30] engage in the creation of nuclear weapons, but if nuclear
[00:15:34] weapons are used against Iran, then I think that
[00:15:38] there will be few people left in the leadership
[00:15:42] of Iran who will oppose the creation
[00:15:45] of their own nuclear weapons, and I say again, this
[00:15:48] strike, even if
[00:15:52] the complex in question is hit,
[00:15:55] destroyed completely or partially, this will
[00:15:58] not lead to solving the problem for
[00:16:01] Israel and the United States of
[00:16:04] America, because the enemy of Israel and the enemy of the United States of America.
[00:19:07] the population, here it is shown, everything we are seeing on the screens now,
[00:19:11] it also came out into the streets, and
[00:19:14] what is the way out for this Brussels elite and for
[00:19:17] people like Macron and Merz, they have only one
[00:19:20] way out, to preserve not just their power, to preserve, it is
[00:19:24] about their physical survival, as soon as they are no longer in
[00:19:28] power, trials await them, not one trial, and there is
[00:19:32] corruption, there is a lot that dossiers have already been collected
[00:19:35] on them, they have only one way out. As they believe,
[00:19:38] this is
[00:19:41] "nach Osten", war against Russia, that's where this
[00:19:44] Plan Readiness 2030 comes from, readiness
[00:19:48] 2030, which our president recently spoke about, that they
[00:19:51] are preparing for war with Russia, but this is not how, we will
[00:19:54] be ready in
[00:19:57] 2030 to repel
[00:20:00] Russia's attack, I immediately remember
[00:20:03] Gliwice at the beginning of the Second World War,
[00:20:43] get into such a military venture, this is a very big question, especially since even if the administration in the United States of America changes, it should
[00:20:46] get married in 2028.
[00:21:20] to divide the pie and
[00:21:22] participate in the reconstruction, this is both the First World War and the Second World War,
[00:21:26] especially the Second World War, so I don't think Americans
[00:21:30] will interfere, the question is, will European leaders dare to
[00:21:33] such an adventure, and indeed our President Putin
[00:21:37] said, this is an adventure, then the war will go by other
[00:21:41] means and methods than in the Ukrainian theater of military operations
[00:21:45] now, so I think they might
[00:21:48] want to... but who will fight? As
[00:21:52] soon as Germany announced the need for
[00:21:55] military service and mandatory service, people immediately came
[00:21:59] out, people, young people, men,
[00:22:02] do not want any war, this generation is against it,
[00:22:06] will they recruit mercenaries somewhere
[00:22:09] from Africa, unlikely, unlikely to succeed, or
[00:22:13] the same path that Hitler took,
[00:22:16] concentration camps, not only throughout Germany, throughout
[00:22:20] Europe, first drive in the dissenters, those who today
[00:22:24] take to the streets, completely suppress democracy,
[00:22:27] establish the most brutal dictatorship, and after that
[00:22:30] take up arms, but this task is not for
[00:22:33] 2030 and probably not even for 2040.
[00:22:36] In Bulgaria, there were just
[00:22:40] elections, those who advocate for some
[00:22:44] dialogue on Ukraine and against military aid to Ukraine
[00:22:48] won.
[00:24:20] they already understand that for them,
[00:24:23] either they go into power and protect the national
[00:24:26] interests of their countries, or a revolution awaits
[00:24:30] them in Europe, massive in all countries
[00:24:33] simultaneously, and what does it mean to protect the interests of their countries? Of course,
[00:24:37] we must abandon military support for Zelensky's regime and
[00:24:41] stop participating in the war, for us this situation is absolutely
[00:24:44] positive from this point of view, in general, I want to
[00:24:48] tell you that the European Union after all, and...
[00:24:50] as I said many years ago, it is heading for its
[00:24:53] collapse, and it will be more beneficial and better
[00:24:57] for us to find mutual understanding,
[00:25:00] opportunities for cooperation with individual leaders
[00:25:04] of European countries, who, even with
[00:25:07] no great love for Russia in one way or another,
[00:25:11] have an understanding of their national
[00:25:14] interests, which means we will always be able to agree in
[00:25:17] economic and political terms.
[00:25:23] return, we will talk specifically about the situation
[00:25:27] in Germany, we will talk with Evgeny Schmidt,
[00:25:30] Bundestag deputy of the twentieth convocation. We are going to
[00:25:33] a commercial.
[00:25:41] Multiple world champion in combat Sambo,
[00:25:44] MMA champion, Honored Master of Sports in
[00:25:47] Sambo, Honored Coach.
[00:26:02] I understood that I needed to work more than the others, there is no fear in the ring
[00:26:06] anymore, when there is, you know, I never liked
[00:26:09] fighting, aha, I always understood that I would be
[00:26:12] judged by my country, if I am a champion, then people will
[00:26:16] understand what Russians are like, almost 10 years were invincible,
[00:26:20] this is wrong, I didn't want to come out invincible, what
[00:26:23] happened that you came to Orthodoxy, I
[00:26:26] understand that God exists and God is here with us in our Orthodox
[00:26:30] church, so I can change the world. Exactly by this
[00:26:34] little bit, Time of Heroes,
[00:26:38] premiere, today on
[00:26:41] the first,
[00:26:47] I'm lost, I'll find the end, but I have no money, test
[00:26:51] me, Constance gave D'Artagnan money received by her husband from
[00:26:54] Cardinal Richelieu, you didn't wear the pendant, having spent everything on
[00:26:58] the road to London, D'Artagnan managed to save the queen's honor and thwart
[00:27:01] the cardinal's plans. Yes, but Constance was poisoned, if only
[00:27:05] they had VTB, when the fate of the beloved and the kingdom hangs by
[00:27:08] a thread, use a free
[00:27:12] the Queen too? VTB is a classic. Wonderful
[00:27:15] solution. And everyone for
[00:27:16] VTB.
[00:27:20] What if you just don't know how
[00:27:23] not to?
[00:27:26] Catch a titmouse catch a crane? And
[00:27:30] what if you can have 100 friends?
[00:27:33] Have 100 rubles, know a lot and don't regret
[00:27:36] it, ever, and what if you just don't know how
[00:27:40] not to, seven waiting for one, curious
[00:27:43] barbarians gigachat to pump up, chase
[00:27:46] two hares catch both, by
[00:27:49] the horns to take, and what if you just do what
[00:27:53] no one has done,
[00:27:56] because above the grass, louder than water, no one
[00:28:00] swims against the current . lying on the stove,
[00:28:03] breaking through ceilings, jumping over
[00:28:06] your head,
[00:28:09] because we were
[00:28:11] inspired by this,
[00:28:15] Sber is always there, we
[00:28:17] invented Syrobogatov - our own cheese, natural,
[00:28:21] rich in taste, we don't repeat, we create
[00:28:24] our own, Syrobogatov - our cheese,
[00:28:28] it's easy to be a queen of shopping with a VTB card, now all
[00:28:31] VTB clients get a discount of up to 6% on any order from
[00:28:35] WB, it's easy to be with VTB.
[00:28:38] Tell me, how else can you impress a girl?
[00:28:42] Well, look, no, no,
[00:28:45] no, thanks, I asked BGPT about it, everything is so convenient
[00:28:49] there, it generated a picture for her and a video.
[00:28:52] Use Nerosey's capabilities in the bline app, for free and
[00:28:56] without VPN. Here's a track too.
[00:29:00] How do you hook it? And did you ask DJP? Don't ask,
[00:29:02] just turn on Beeline, let's get
[00:29:05] real,
[00:29:08] care is more expensive
[00:29:10] than money, grandma transferred me,
[00:29:14] told me not to tell you,
[00:29:17] now there are no fees for transfers and utility payments in Sberbank
[00:29:21] online, get your
[00:29:23] hands ready, 11:11 sale on Ozon,
[00:29:27] stylish, profitable, choose clothes and shoes with discounts up to
[00:29:30] 90%, open a deposit at 20% up to 300,000
[00:29:34] rubles. Finuslugi Marketplace for money.
[00:29:38] It seems everything is simply delightful.
[00:29:41] Everyone for discounts on WB. Maheev grainy mustard
[00:29:44] for only 59
[00:29:46] rubles.
[00:29:49] 5 months of guaranteed income, 35% per annum in the first
[00:29:53] month. VTB - my investments. Calmness is rewarded.
[00:29:56] The scammers' call center has already cast a greedy eye on the city,
[00:30:00] but of course, nothing
[00:30:02] worked out for them, all residents connected free protection services in
[00:30:06] Sberbank Online for themselves and their loved ones, leaving the scammers high and dry,
[00:30:09] connect Sber protection services and participate in the drawing of millions
[00:30:13] of bonuses, thank you, safety is
[00:30:16] us, it's with me, can I take a selfie with
[00:30:20] the bird for my online store? And are you a
[00:30:22] seller? Yes, then for you there is also Sber business
[00:30:26] from Sber,
[00:30:29] Sber - your business assistant.
[00:30:33] Hot Ice, Grand Prix of Russia
[00:30:37] broadcast from
[00:30:39] Yekaterinburg,
[00:30:42] on the weekend on
[00:30:44] the first.
[00:30:47] Power creates the impossible, emotions
[00:30:50] remain in memory,
[00:30:52] perfection fills the country with pride, over
[00:30:56] which the sun never sets.
[00:30:59] T-Bank - sponsor of figure skating.
[00:31:14] On air is a big one.
[00:31:17] Evgenia, we are glad to welcome you, thank you for finding
[00:31:20] the time, and of course, your opinion is very interesting
[00:31:24] regarding those
[00:31:27] riots that took place yesterday, the day before yesterday in
[00:31:44] the result of the CDU's policy, which for years flirted
[00:31:48] with left-wing extremism and encouraged it, in combination with uncontrolled
[00:31:51] migration, where criminals do not have to fear any
[00:31:54] consequences, last night must finally have consequences. Only
[00:31:58] AfD is capable of drawing conclusions. I wish a speedy
[00:32:01] recovery to the many injured
[00:32:03] police officers.
[00:32:06] Do you think that Chancellor Merz,
[00:32:09] the CDU, that they are responsible for
[00:32:12] the riots?
[00:32:16] Absolutely, naturally, one must consider that
[00:32:19] these riots, or rather protests, which led to
[00:32:22] riots, are all a chain of events of recent
[00:32:26] years, a chain or the results of the policy pursued by both
[00:32:30] Merkel and Scholz and now Merz, the fall,
[00:32:33] a significant drop in the standard of living, a drop in the level of security and
[00:32:37] uncertainty of the younger generation about
[00:32:40] the future, that the prosperity
[00:32:43] that Germany used to enjoy will be available to
[00:32:47] their generation, which is why young people took to the streets
[00:32:50] this Saturday, of course, the calls sounded
[00:32:54] rather generalized, in general there
[00:32:58] was prosperity, as one of the calls or one
[00:33:01] of the slogans, for example,
[00:33:05] non-admission to military service, what
[00:33:08] young people are again being intimidated with, that the
[00:33:12] Ukrainian conflict may spill over into
[00:33:15] direct military confrontation between Germany and Russia, that
[00:33:18] is, what will directly affect the younger generation,
[00:33:22] well, the climate agenda was also used
[00:33:25] in general, a fair
[00:33:28] distribution of prosperity between
[00:33:31] generations. In the end, of course, as expected, as
[00:33:34] Ms. Weidel also stated,
[00:33:38] left-radical circles channeled these
[00:33:42] protest demonstrations, that's all. That is, if
[00:33:45] all the protests seemed quite peaceful during the day,
[00:33:49] then in the evening attacks on police officers began,
[00:33:52] fights began,
[00:33:55] atrocities and looting of stores,
[00:33:58] again, many stores were
[00:34:01] prematurely blocked with
[00:34:04] plywood, in general, the owners used the time
[00:34:07] to prepare, so as not to allow the events that we
[00:34:10] observed in France, and again,
[00:34:13] the police were everywhere, so it was still possible to
[00:34:17] avoid mass pogroms - according to
[00:34:19] the French scenario, but nevertheless some stores in large
[00:34:23] cities suffered, and, as in France,
[00:34:26] youth of migrant
[00:34:30] origin actively participated in everything,
[00:34:32] this is exactly the consequence
[00:34:35] of flirting with left-radical forces, which
[00:34:39] actually enjoy chaos, the policy
[00:34:42] of mass uncontrolled migration, when... people who do not
[00:34:46] respect our laws, our way
[00:34:49] of life, are massively accepted into the country, and
[00:34:53] who preach
[00:34:56] this kind of outrage that we observed in France and
[00:35:00] partially now in Germany,
[00:35:02] in Germany there were several local
[00:35:05] elections that were very
[00:35:07] successful for your party, what
[00:35:10] happened after them, to what extent
[00:35:14] was it possible...
[00:35:45] with other parties, the Alternative for Germany party lacks only three
[00:35:49] votes for an absolute majority, but there are already
[00:35:52] positive hints that either
[00:35:55] Sahra Wagenknecht's Union party or
[00:35:59] fragments of the Christian Democrats will provide
[00:36:02] these three missing votes, then for the first time
[00:36:05] in the entire history, in the entire modern history of Germany,
[00:36:09] the Alternative for Germany party will receive its fully
[00:36:12] controlled government and... will begin
[00:36:15] to implement the political slogans
[00:36:18] or party program that it promised, this is a complete reversal
[00:36:22] of policy, facing the common man, and not what we
[00:36:25] observed over the past years. A policy maximally detached
[00:36:29] from the interests of voters in the interests of certain globalist
[00:36:33] structures, considering that we are talking about
[00:36:36] local governments,
[00:36:39] governments of individual states, not
[00:36:42] the federal government, will the AfD
[00:36:45] have the opportunity to influence foreign policy, in particular
[00:36:49] on the issue of
[00:36:49] Ukraine?
[00:36:53] in this political, let's say, context, of course,
[00:36:56] directly... no, but, but one should not forget that
[00:37:00] the successes of the Alternative for Germany in the state
[00:37:03] elections also boost ratings in
[00:37:06] federal elections, already
[00:37:10] now the party has confidently established itself above
[00:37:13] 30%, overtaking Merz's party,
[00:37:16] the second one, by more than 10% in
[00:37:19] some polls, so the rise of Alternative for Germany
[00:37:23] just contributes to the fact that the ruling coalition from...
[00:37:31] and social democrats, it's on its last legs, and we are seriously counting on the fact that, if not this year, then
[00:37:35] next year, early elections will be held in Germany, where the Alternative for Germany party will take
[00:37:39] a confident first place and will have every reason
[00:37:42] to form its own federal government, and then
[00:37:46] , of course, there will be changes in policy, including in the Ukrainian
[00:37:50] direction. When
[00:37:53] Hitler was preparing for World War II,
[00:37:56] for the invasion of the Soviet Union, for
[00:37:59] the attack on Poland, France, England were among
[00:38:03] his targets, he
[00:38:05] very energetically engaged in brainwashing
[00:38:09] the population of Germany, there was a very
[00:38:13] active, as you probably know better than me, there was a very
[00:38:16] active propaganda campaign, the population
[00:38:20] of Germany was being prepared for war, something similar
[00:38:24] is happening in Germany now. Under Chancellor
[00:38:27] Scholz? I would certainly not
[00:38:31] want to draw such direct historical parallels, but
[00:38:34] nevertheless, it cannot be denied that the
[00:38:38] state propaganda machine
[00:38:41] is working at full capacity, they are trying to form
[00:38:44] an image of an enemy out of Russia, information is constantly flowing
[00:38:47] about some provocations, about a certain hybrid
[00:38:50] war, that is, the image of an external enemy
[00:38:54] is being actively promoted, around whom the Germans are supposedly
[00:38:58] to rally, or rather, around the chancellor who opposes
[00:39:01] this enemy, that is, all internal problems are
[00:39:05] being pushed into the background, and there are a huge
[00:39:07] number of problems in Germany domestically, and
[00:39:11] this is confirmed by the latest protests,
[00:39:13] again, Scholz's negative rating, and Scholz
[00:39:17] is apparently trying to hold on to power with this
[00:39:20] last trump card, saying, we have an external enemy,
[00:39:23] come on... and President Putin
[00:40:28] said that those who, for example,
[00:40:31] produce weapons for Ukraine,
[00:40:34] and these weapons are used to
[00:40:36] strike deep into Russian territory, that they
[00:40:39] should understand that in Russia they know who
[00:40:43] they are, where they are, and what they
[00:40:46] are doing, and it was clear that the president spoke
[00:40:49] about this, well, let's say , not just
[00:40:52] as a geography lesson, he meant that there could be
[00:40:56] serious, concrete consequences for
[00:40:59] those who actually fight Russia
[00:41:02] with the hands of Ukraine. Is there
[00:41:05] an understanding of this in Germany?
[00:41:07] You know, in Germany, Scholz
[00:41:11] has long had the nickname "Chancellor of Ukraine",
[00:41:14] that is, a person who pays more and more
[00:41:18] attention to another country,
[00:41:21] internal problems,
[00:41:24] internal crises. Our party, Alternative for
[00:41:27] Germany, consistently advocates for an end
[00:41:31] to this policy of ignoring our own national interests,
[00:41:34] for an end to dragging our country into a military
[00:41:38] conflict, which we absolutely do not need. Actually,
[00:41:42] answering your question, is there an understanding? Yes, it
[00:41:46] exists, actually it can be
[00:41:48] seen in the party ratings, where the Alternative
[00:41:51] for Germany party has long established itself as
[00:41:55] number one, above 30%,
[00:41:58] surpassing the second party by more than 10%, and the ratings
[00:42:01] are constantly growing, more and more people
[00:42:04] simply do not trust that...
[00:42:08] we hope to talk to you in
[00:48:35] situation, the budget is being discussed,
[00:48:38] the budget is being adopted,
[00:48:40] it plans to fulfill social obligations,
[00:48:44] at the same time deal with a very
[00:48:47] large-scale challenge from
[00:48:50] Europe, and the United
[00:48:53] States too, while still to some extent
[00:48:57] involved in the conflict in Ukraine,
[00:49:00] certainly not on the side of Russia. How
[00:49:04] will we cope with all this?
[00:49:07] Well, first of all, I must say that the organization and cohesion
[00:49:11] of the authorities, civil society and consolidation around our
[00:49:14] leader is unprecedented.
[00:49:17] The main financial document,
[00:49:53] the budget, is absolutely balanced, all social
[00:49:55] obligations will be fulfilled, I tell you this as a representative
[00:49:59] of the United Russia faction, that all social
[00:50:03] obligations, one of the deputies, the head of the United
[00:50:06] Russia faction, yes, I confirm that all
[00:50:09] social obligations that are announced today when
[00:50:13] the budget of the Russian Federation is conceptually
[00:50:17] adopted in the first reading, they are all 100%
[00:50:20] confirmed. We see all the numbers, we see
[00:50:24] the obligations that the state has taken on itself, we know where
[00:50:27] this money will come from, this seems to me an absolutely crucial
[00:50:31] thing, especially in a period, as you said, a difficult period
[00:50:34] for Russia and for the world economy as
[00:50:38] a whole, in order to move forward confidently
[00:50:41] and protect its goals and objectives, unlike the European Union, what
[00:50:45] is happening there now, we see, unlike, strictly speaking, the United
[00:50:48] States, because the balance that they are now looking for in their
[00:50:52] domestic policy, in foreign policy, on the Middle Eastern
[00:50:56] track, on the side of the Ukrainian conflict,
[00:50:59] these are, of course, very serious tasks that they face.
[00:51:02] I repeat, we have been moving for these 4 years
[00:51:06] and are moving towards achieving our goals and objectives,
[00:51:09] they are being achieved, slowly,
[00:51:12] quickly, this question is completely irrelevant for us now,
[00:51:15] as from the very beginning, we always said that there is no need to rush
[00:51:18] with this, today not a single person doubts that we...
[00:51:52] about the fact that there is a complete understanding, taking into account
[00:51:56] the restructuring of the military-industrial complex, taking into account the fact that we are indeed
[00:51:59] ahead in innovative technologies, the supply
[00:52:02] of weapons to the line of contact, namely of our
[00:52:06] equipment, namely of our weapons, is today very
[00:52:09] seriously putting the European Union in a stupor, who
[00:52:13] are trying to help do everything so that Ukraine
[00:52:17] wins, which they doubt more and more every day,
[00:52:20] and accordingly the United States, therefore the United States
[00:52:24] sees our leader Putin as the only adequate
[00:52:27] mediator for achieving its goals on the Middle Eastern
[00:52:30] track and in Ukraine, this is absolutely obvious, because
[00:52:34] he...
[00:52:48] the United States, because if they want to get out of the situation, not through
[00:52:52] a nuclear bomb, as we said at the beginning, but at least through
[00:52:56] the option of Russia's mediation in terms of exporting
[00:52:59] enriched uranium, this issue has not disappeared, but
[00:53:02] the president needs to solve this. states and
[00:53:05] naturally Ukraine has no other options than to
[00:53:09] continue the negotiation tracks that began
[00:53:12] today through various teams in economics and politics from Russia
[00:53:15] and the Trump team, there are no other options,
[00:53:19] the diesel agreement and Oleshky,
[00:53:23] which we talked about at the very beginning, are not
[00:54:06] The strategic task is to conclude a long-term peace, and as
[00:54:09] for such local things, it means that
[00:54:13] if such humanitarian crises occurred,
[00:54:17] as in Oleshky, this means that we, just
[00:54:20] like two days ago, resolved this issue and
[00:54:24] will continue to act in this way. The main thing is that,
[00:54:28] perhaps, it was not mentioned every day during these, every
[00:54:31] hour, during these couple of days when this action was taking place, after all...
[00:55:35] return to Ukraine, and none of them would have
[00:55:39] been able to leave if Russia had not agreed
[00:55:42] to it, when it comes to
[00:55:45] clearing roads, removing mines, risking
[00:55:48] the lives of our guys, there are casualties, by the way,
[00:55:52] absolutely right, Russia did all this, it didn't
[00:55:55] cost Ukraine much,
[00:55:58] the second reason why they behaved
[00:56:01] restrainedly is, probably, of course, that they wanted to please.
[00:57:05] serve as a basis for some kind of truce along
[00:57:08] the entire line of contact, but let them not
[00:57:11] even think about
[00:57:13] it.
[00:57:17] Therefore, Vladimirovna. I don't know how
[00:57:20] this war will end,
[00:57:23] it is clear that some of our conditions,
[00:57:27] our fundamental conditions,
[00:57:30] Ukraine will have to fulfill, but I am not
[00:57:33] sure that among these conditions is
[00:57:36] the removal of Zelensky from power, and
[00:57:40] the elimination of the regime he built in
[00:57:43] Ukraine, the neo-Nazi regime, what do you
[00:57:46] think? If we went for such
[00:57:49] an agreement, would it not mean
[00:57:52] that for a not very long
[00:57:55] time, Ukraine would again resume
[00:57:59] aggressive actions against Russia and we would have to
[00:58:02] fight again. No, how so, regarding Russian
[00:58:06] conditions, absolutely strict requirement -
[00:58:09] denazification, and that means the destruction of this
[00:58:12] regime. We are not talking about the physical elimination of Zelensky, to hell with him, let
[00:58:16] him live there.
[01:00:17] this conflict around Ukraine
[01:00:20] so that a lasting peace was concluded
[01:00:24] and so that European hawks
[01:00:27] would agree to let us live and develop normally,
[01:00:30] they understood our security interests, I
[01:00:34] would say we cannot, I would say we must,
[01:00:38] this is our goal, it may be
[01:00:41] achieved hardly this
[01:00:45] year, possibly with...
[01:02:18] the position of President of Ukraine will probably be occupied by another
[01:02:21] person, it seems to me, and
[01:02:25] I deliberately use the word "seems",
[01:02:28] because that... his
[01:02:33] correctness, but it seems to me
[01:02:36] that when President Putin said that he
[01:02:40] would only meet with Zelensky in Moscow, well, or when
[01:02:43] everything has already been agreed upon and it only remains
[01:02:46] to sign, it was meant to show that we do not
[01:02:50] perceive the Kiev ruler
[01:02:54] as a legitimate negotiating partner,
[01:02:57] of course, the president spoke about this, President
[01:03:00] Putin spoke about this, this is a fundamental
[01:03:03] position, he said that one can talk to anyone,
[01:03:07] but any documents must be signed by
[01:03:10] the person who has the authority, and this
[01:03:14] position has not changed, those who have
[01:03:16] the authority,
[01:03:19] and the structures representing them, Zelensky is illegitimate
[01:03:23] today, all issues of the big game watch on