BBCNEWS — The Climate Question 20260808 233000 UTC 557 transcript segments Original Broadcaster Captioning (Enhanced) Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record. [00:00:00] you are. Business on BBC News. Make [00:00:01] Make the connection. MUSIC [00:00:13] MUSIC Now Now on BBC News. Understanding the [00:00:15] the future of our changing world world as the earth warms due to climate [00:00:19] climate change. How hot could it [00:00:21] it really get? Author Kate Marvel [00:00:24] Marvel investigates in the climate [00:00:27] climate question. The more you know [00:00:33] know about the universe, the more more you realise how much most of [00:00:37] of it sucks. All of the other planets [00:00:40] planets that we know of are complete [00:00:42] complete garbage, and the earth is [00:00:45] is the only good place in the universe. [00:00:48] universe. And so just realising that that and realising how beautiful [00:00:52] beautiful and perfect this planet planet is just sort of fills me with [00:00:55] with a sense of wonder every day. [00:00:57] day. We keep breaking temperature [00:01:00] temperature records. So how hot will will the earth get? We'll talk about [00:01:03] about the science with a top climate climate expert. And we'll be talking [00:01:06] talking about something just as important [00:01:09] important as the science, how those those facts make us feel. That's [00:01:12] That's on the climate question from from the BBC World Service. I'm Jordan [00:01:16] Jordan Dunbar. And I'm Graihagh Jackson. [00:01:23] Jackson. Our climate expert is Professor [00:01:25] Professor Kate Marvel. Hi, Kate. Kate. Hi there. So excited to be [00:01:29] be here. Kate, I'm just gonna go go through your credits. You may [00:01:31] may want to prepare to buy or indeed [00:01:33] indeed blush because you're a climate [00:01:36] climate scientist, an astrophysicist, astrophysicist, a cosmologist as [00:01:39] as well as a world expert in clouds. clouds. Yeah. So this guy actually [00:01:43] actually isn't the limit for you, you, Kate. Well done Greg. Thanks Thanks for that. Drumroll, Jordan. [00:01:47] Jordan. So we've got loads of questions questions for you, especially about [00:01:50] about your new book, The Human Emotions [00:01:53] Emotions The Nine Things We Can Feel [00:01:55] Feel in Response to Our Warming World. World. But first, I really want to [00:01:58] to dig into the science of climate [00:02:00] climate change and how hot our planet [00:02:03] planet might get because indeed you [00:02:05] you work at Nasa. So for this we [00:02:09] we use climate models. Kate, what [00:02:11] what are climate models and how do do they work? So a climate model [00:02:15] model is basically everything that [00:02:17] that we know about the physics and [00:02:19] and the chemistry of how the world [00:02:22] world works. Translated into equations [00:02:24] equations and solved on big supercomputers. [00:02:27] supercomputers. So you can think think of a climate model as just [00:02:31] just a collection of equations, but [00:02:33] but you can also think of it as very [00:02:36] very literally a world building machine. [00:02:39] machine. Climate models run on stories. [00:02:41] stories. You take a story. So for [00:02:43] for example, the story of recent recent history and you translate [00:02:47] translate that story into emissions emissions of greenhouse gases and [00:02:51] and aerosols and other pollutants. pollutants. And you tell that story [00:02:54] story to the climate model. And the the climate model will spit out a [00:02:58] a world. It'll tell you what the [00:03:00] the temperature is, what the rainfall [00:03:03] rainfall patterns look like. And And this is really useful because [00:03:05] because you can tell the climate climate model counterfactual stories. [00:03:09] stories. You can say, what if we [00:03:11] we never existed? What if we don't [00:03:14] don't check our emissions? What was was the world like back in the last [00:03:17] last ice age? And it will spit out out the worlds. And so that's the [00:03:21] the way that that I like to think think about what climate models are [00:03:25] are showing us. And where do you [00:03:27] you get all of the like characters characters for those climate stories? [00:03:31] stories? Do they come from the past? past? Where do you get the ingredients ingredients for those to make the [00:03:35] the predictions? Oh, that's such such a good question. So I am a total [00:03:39] total boring pedant on this. Climate Climate models don't make predictions. [00:03:43] predictions. They make projections projections and what that means. means. The really crucial difference [00:03:46] difference is predictions are saying [00:03:48] saying this is what will happen. [00:03:50] happen. And a projection is conditional. conditional. A projection is if we [00:03:54] we do this then this will happen. happen. And so when somebody says [00:03:58] says climate models predict that [00:04:00] that in the year 2100, everything everything is going to be completely [00:04:04] completely apocalyptic or climate climate models predict that in the [00:04:06] the year 2100 everything will be [00:04:08] be fine. Those are conditional. Those [00:04:11] Those are conditional on the stories stories that are told to the climate [00:04:15] climate model. And so, for example, [00:04:18] example, in that future, that apocalyptic apocalyptic future that is conditional. [00:04:21] conditional. That's a projection projection conditional on human beings [00:04:25] beings not getting emissions under under control. I know that models [00:04:28] models broadly say that the more more of these planet warming gases [00:04:31] gases like carbon dioxide there is is in the sky, the warmer our planet [00:04:34] planet gets. But it's actually a [00:04:37] a very complicated world that you're you're having to build. And there [00:04:41] there are some things that might might accelerate climate change. [00:04:44] change. But also there are other other things, mechanisms, natural [00:04:47] natural feedbacks that might be putting putting the brakes or even reversing [00:04:50] reversing climate change. And could could you talk us through some of of those processes like plants, say, [00:04:54] say, for instance, and how that works works in a very complicated model [00:04:58] model like the ones you were describing. [00:05:02] describing. So my job, if I could could describe it really succinctly, [00:05:05] succinctly, is to figure out how how hot it's going to get. And when [00:05:09] when you say, you know, we don't don't know how hot it's going to to get, people are like what climate [00:05:12] climate scientists like you guys guys had one job, you know, come [00:05:15] come on, how you don't know that? [00:05:17] that? And the reason one of the reasons reasons that we don't know exactly [00:05:20] exactly how hot it's going to get get is we've never done this experiment [00:05:24] experiment before. We've never kicked [00:05:26] kicked the earth this hard. And so [00:05:29] so we don't really know exactly how [00:05:32] how it's going to react. We do know know because it is such basic physics [00:05:35] physics that we have known since since the 19th century that putting [00:05:38] putting a bunch of greenhouse gases gases in the atmosphere increases [00:05:41] increases the temperature of the the planet and the primary greenhouse [00:05:44] greenhouse gas that we're emitting [00:05:45] emitting is carbon dioxide. About [00:05:48] About half of the carbon dioxide dioxide that human beings put in [00:05:51] in the atmosphere gets taken out [00:05:54] out of the atmosphere by stuff that [00:05:56] that photosynthesises basically plants plants and phytoplankton. And the [00:06:00] the thing is, there's no guarantee guarantee that they're going to continue [00:06:03] continue doing that into the future. [00:06:06] future. It's really hard as a forest forest to take carbon dioxide out [00:06:10] out of the atmosphere when you're you're on fire. So we know that as [00:06:13] as the climate changes, the ability [00:06:15] ability of stuff to grow on the Earth's [00:06:17] Earth's surface is going to change. [00:06:19] change. And what that means is that [00:06:22] that the more of the CO2 that we [00:06:24] we emit in the future might be staying [00:06:27] staying up there in the atmosphere, atmosphere, warming the planet. So [00:06:30] So we don't know how much of our our CO2 is going to stay in the future [00:06:34] future atmosphere. And a lot of that that is because we don't know how how plants are going to do. But then [00:06:38] then we also don't know how that that CO2 is going to warm up the [00:06:42] the planet. And that's because we [00:06:45] we don't exactly know what kind of [00:06:47] of changes to the whole earth system system that's going to provoke. So [00:06:50] So one of the big wild cards there there is clouds. We don't know how [00:06:54] how clouds are going to rearrange rearrange themselves in order to [00:06:56] to speed up or slow down the warming. [00:07:00] warming. We are fairly certain, though, though, that there is no kind of [00:07:03] of natural emergency brake. Our best best estimate of what plants are [00:07:06] are going to do, what we call carbon carbon cycle feedbacks is that that's [00:07:10] that's going to lead to more CO2 [00:07:12] CO2 in the atmosphere. And our best best estimate of what clouds are [00:07:15] are going to do is a destabilising destabilising feedback, something [00:07:18] something that makes global warming warming worse. And is that why you you have so many different climate [00:07:22] climate models? It's not like you you just have a few. You have lots [00:07:25] lots of different ones to try and and bring in all these variables [00:07:29] variables completely. Yeah. So when when we think about a climate model, [00:07:32] model, which is just like a computer computer representation of reality, [00:07:36] reality, right? If that is completely [00:07:38] completely perfect, if that is able [00:07:40] able to exactly represent reality, [00:07:43] reality, that's literally the matrix, [00:07:45] matrix, right? And that's impossible. impossible. And that's creepy. And [00:07:48] And we don't really want that. Right? Right? And so climate models, like [00:07:52] like all scientific models are necessarily [00:07:56] necessarily approximations of reality. reality. We know how clouds work. [00:07:59] work. But the thing is clouds are [00:08:01] are formed when little tiny water [00:08:04] water droplets or ice crystals coagulate coagulate around, you know, dust [00:08:08] dust grains or little bits of sea [00:08:10] sea salt or whatever. And in order [00:08:12] order to get that completely accurately, accurately, you would need a computer [00:08:16] computer that is capable of tracking tracking every single little dust, [00:08:19] dust, grain and water droplet in [00:08:21] in the entire atmosphere. We don't [00:08:24] don't have computers that powerful. powerful. And so as a result, we [00:08:27] we have to make kind of approximations. [00:08:29] approximations. We have to say when [00:08:31] when this happens, clouds do this this and there are different climate [00:08:34] climate modelling groups all over over the world who are all making [00:08:38] making kind slightly different choices, choices, different physically defensible [00:08:42] defensible approximations. And when when we compare all of those different different climate models together, [00:08:46] together, we get kind of an understanding [00:08:49] understanding of what is really solid, [00:08:51] solid, what we completely get and and what there still uncertainty [00:08:54] uncertainty in. You've mentioned [00:08:58] mentioned clouds a couple of times [00:08:59] times there, Kate. Why are they so [00:09:03] so important here? Clouds are so so I wish I didn't have to think [00:09:06] think about clouds. I am a Californian. [00:09:11] Californian. I love perfect weather. [00:09:14] weather. I get really mad when the [00:09:16] the temperature drops below 20 Celsius. [00:09:19] Celsius. Don't come to England. Oh, [00:09:20] Oh, it's in the sky. So so I don't [00:09:24] don't want to have to care about about clouds, but I kind of have [00:09:27] have to. And that's because they're [00:09:30] they're incredibly important in regulating regulating the climate system. So [00:09:33] So the thing about clouds is that [00:09:36] that they have this dual effect. effect. They both cool the planet [00:09:40] planet by blocking sunlight and they they warm the planet because they [00:09:43] they have their own greenhouse effect. [00:09:45] effect. Right now, the unit that [00:09:47] that scientists use to measure kind kind of the energy imbalance of the [00:09:51] the planet, how much it's out of of whack is what's like in a light [00:09:55] light bulb per square metre. And [00:09:57] And our best estimate of the what [00:10:00] what happens when we double carbon [00:10:02] carbon dioxide in the atmosphere? [00:10:06] atmosphere? That's around 4W/m2. 4W/m2. When we look at what clouds [00:10:10] clouds are doing, clouds are blocking [00:10:12] blocking our cooling the planet by [00:10:15] by about 50W per square metre. At [00:10:18] At the same time, they're also warming [00:10:20] warming the planet by about 25W/m2. [00:10:24] 25W/m2. So they do two things at [00:10:25] at once. They're incredibly powerful [00:10:28] powerful and they're really, really really difficult to get right in [00:10:30] in a climate model because it's this this scale mismatch. It's the fact [00:10:34] fact that you have to understand understand what's happening at the [00:10:36] the very small scales, but then you you also have to get what's happening [00:10:40] happening at global scales. So what what do those projections tell us [00:10:44] us then about how hot the earth might [00:10:46] might get? So I would say the number [00:10:50] number one thing we can take away [00:10:52] away from that is actually the biggest [00:10:55] biggest uncertainty in how hot the the planet will get is what human [00:10:59] human beings are going to do. The [00:11:02] The emissions scenario, basically basically what we call the story [00:11:06] story about what human societies societies will choose to do, whether [00:11:08] whether we will choose to increase increase our emissions, keep them [00:11:12] them flat or decrease them. That That is the largest reason that we [00:11:16] we don't know how hot it's going going to get. But even when you just [00:11:19] just look at the physical science science uncertainty, even when you [00:11:22] you just look at what we know about about the physics of how the earth [00:11:26] earth will respond, we are fairly [00:11:29] fairly certain that the net aggregate aggregate impact of these what we [00:11:33] we call cloud feedbacks, is going [00:11:36] going to be destabilising. It's going going to make the warming worse. [00:11:40] worse. Our best estimate of what what plants are going to do. These [00:11:43] These carbon cycle feedbacks is that's that's going to lead to more CO2 [00:11:47] CO2 building up in the atmosphere. atmosphere. That's going to make make warming worse. I feel like I'm [00:11:51] I'm in this really unique position [00:11:53] position as a scientist because this this you know, I have this research research question. How hot is it [00:11:57] it going to get? And I don't want [00:12:00] want to know the answer to that research research question. Even though it's [00:12:03] it's important to study the physics physics of how the earth system reacts. [00:12:06] reacts. I don't want to do that experiment. experiment. I think we shouldn't. [00:12:10] shouldn't. But Kate, if I may push [00:12:12] push back a little bit on that, surely [00:12:14] surely we need to know the trajectory [00:12:16] trajectory we're heading in, in order [00:12:19] order to adapt. Oh, absolutely. You [00:12:21] You know, I am very pro-science. pro-science. I am very pro doing [00:12:25] doing science, figuring out how the the earth works. And I think you're [00:12:29] you're absolutely right that that that is relevant no matter what the [00:12:33] the future looks like because no [00:12:35] no climate change is unfortunately unfortunately not on the table. We're [00:12:39] We're almost certainly going to blow [00:12:43] blow past the 1.5 Celsius target. target. We're almost certainly going [00:12:46] going to warm far more than that. [00:12:49] that. And even if we were to stop [00:12:52] stop emissions tomorrow, the temperature temperature of the planet would probably [00:12:55] probably stabilise. But the ocean [00:12:58] ocean is not done catching up. So [00:13:00] So there is a lot of baked in sea [00:13:03] sea level rise already. And so you you are absolutely right that it [00:13:06] it is completely crucial to understand [00:13:09] understand the physics of the earth earth system, the processes that [00:13:12] that are underlying that in order order to make decisions in the future. future. What I was saying is that [00:13:16] that worst case scenario, I don't don't want to do that experiment. [00:13:19] experiment. I don't want to have have experimental evidence of what [00:13:22] what the world looks like under the the worst case scenario. I just wanted [00:13:26] wanted to get in my head a couple couple of things straight from what [00:13:29] what you've been talking about. There's There's uncertainty because of all [00:13:32] all these different variables and and how complex it is in these projections, [00:13:36] projections, not predictions, projections projections that we're making the [00:13:39] the future never predictions. But But can you talk just very simply [00:13:42] simply about the certainty we have have of how the planet is warming? [00:13:46] warming? Exactly. So I want to be [00:13:49] be very clear that uncertainty is [00:13:51] is not the same thing as ignorance. [00:13:54] ignorance. We don't know everything, everything, but that does not mean [00:13:57] mean we know nothing. And as a scientist, [00:14:00] scientist, I like to talk about uncertainty uncertainty because that's where [00:14:03] where my head is all day. That's [00:14:05] That's my job. If we figured out out all of science, I would have [00:14:09] have to find something else to do do with my life. And I don't want [00:14:12] want to do that. So there is uncertainty. [00:14:16] uncertainty. But you're absolutely absolutely correct that there is [00:14:18] is complete and total certainty in [00:14:20] in some things. The fact that carbon [00:14:24] carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, [00:14:25] gas, methane is a greenhouse gas [00:14:28] gas and greenhouse gases warm the [00:14:30] the planet. This is incredibly well [00:14:33] well established science. We have [00:14:35] have known this stuff since the 1800s, [00:14:38] 1800s, and the science has only gotten gotten more solid from there. So [00:14:42] So I don't think I think we need need to be aware that uncertainty [00:14:44] uncertainty is often weaponised against against us. People often say, oh, [00:14:48] oh, well, the science is unsettled. unsettled. Therefore we don't have [00:14:51] have to do anything. The science science does have big uncertainties [00:14:55] uncertainties in the future. You You know, we've never done this experiment experiment before. We don't know [00:14:58] know exactly what's going to happen, [00:15:01] happen, but we are more sure that [00:15:03] that greenhouse gases cause the climate climate to change than we are that [00:15:07] that smoking causes cancer. Wow. Wow. I'm fascinated because we've [00:15:11] we've been talking about climate climate modelling and variables and [00:15:14] and data and you're a climate scientist, scientist, but you've written a book [00:15:18] book called Human Nature Nine Ways [00:15:19] Ways to Feel About Our Changing Planet. [00:15:22] Planet. Why did you want to link [00:15:26] link emotions with climate science? science? Because to me, one is so [00:15:28] so data driven and kind of rational. [00:15:32] rational. Yeah, I was really uneasy [00:15:34] uneasy for a while because I did [00:15:37] did feel things about the earth. [00:15:39] earth. I have a conflict of interest interest because I live on the thing [00:15:43] thing that I study and I do care. care. I do care what happens to it. [00:15:47] it. And but for a long time I thought, thought, oh, I shouldn't have these [00:15:51] these feelings because I'm a scientist, scientist, I'm rational. I am data [00:15:55] data driven. And as scientists, we [00:15:58] we are trained to say, oh, we don't don't have any feelings. We don't [00:16:01] don't have any emotions because supposedly supposedly that is supposed to make [00:16:05] make people believe us more if we we are completely objective scientific [00:16:08] scientific robots. And then it kind [00:16:10] kind of hit me. I realised that, [00:16:12] that, oh, pretending we don't have [00:16:15] have any emotions, that doesn't make [00:16:18] make us more objective, that makes [00:16:19] makes us liars. And I don't want [00:16:22] want to be a liar. And then I kind [00:16:24] kind of realised that, oh, there [00:16:28] there is no tension between getting [00:16:29] getting the science right and having having feelings about what you're [00:16:33] you're seeing and what you're studying. [00:16:36] studying. You can feel sad or joyful [00:16:39] joyful or angry and at the same time time you can get the math right. [00:16:42] right. There's no tension for me me between those two. And I think [00:16:45] think when we talk about climate [00:16:47] climate change, oftentimes just talking talking about the data, just talking [00:16:51] talking about the equations and the the graphs. And don't get me wrong, [00:16:54] wrong, I love equations, I love graphs, graphs, but we scientists have this [00:16:58] this tendency to be like, oh, just just one more graph and people will [00:17:00] will believe us. And that's not how [00:17:02] how people work, right? People respond [00:17:05] respond to emotions. People respond respond to stories. And so what I [00:17:08] I wanted to do was talk in that sort [00:17:11] sort of language in the hopes that that it would resonate with more [00:17:14] more people. What was the turning [00:17:16] turning point for you? Why did you you suddenly decide, OK, I've got [00:17:20] got to do this. I've got to talk talk about this as well. I think [00:17:23] think one of the turning points was [00:17:24] was having a kid. When you're a scientist, [00:17:28] scientist, it's very easy to compartmentalise. compartmentalise. It's very easy [00:17:31] easy to study climate model projections [00:17:34] projections of what's going to happen happen in 2050, because that feels [00:17:38] feels very abstract, that feels very very far away. And then when you [00:17:41] you have a kid and you realise, no [00:17:44] no 2050 is his adulthood, then things things start to become really concrete [00:17:48] concrete in a way that maybe you you knew intellectually before, but [00:17:52] but now you feel very profoundly. profoundly. I think a lot of times, [00:17:56] times, and I'm sure you guys have have run into this to a lot of times [00:17:59] times climate coverage is really really designed to try to make you [00:18:03] you feel one thing, right? You're You're supposed to feel really freaked [00:18:07] freaked out or really, really angry angry or just really, really sad [00:18:11] sad at what we're losing or maybe maybe hopeful that there are things [00:18:15] things that we can do about this. [00:18:17] this. And I got really frustrated [00:18:20] frustrated at kind of the implication implication that there was only one [00:18:23] one thing that you could feel about [00:18:25] about climate change because fundamentally fundamentally this is the whole planet [00:18:28] planet changing. This is everything everything that we know, everything [00:18:32] everything that we love. And how [00:18:34] how on earth can you have only one [00:18:36] one feeling about that? That's really really impossible. And so sometimes, sometimes, you know, people are like, [00:18:40] like, how do you feel about climate climate change? And it's like, oh, oh, I don't know. I feel all the [00:18:44] the feelings and I feel them all all really strongly. In the book [00:18:47] book you've written about grief, grief, could you tell us about some [00:18:49] some of the things that you've seen seen change and that you are grieving? [00:18:53] grieving? Yeah. So I live in New [00:18:54] New York City now, but I am a Californian [00:18:58] Californian by birth and my heart [00:19:01] heart is in California. I lived in [00:19:04] in Northern California, which is [00:19:06] is objectively the most beautiful beautiful place on the planet. But [00:19:10] But when you talk about California [00:19:12] California and climate change, what [00:19:14] what comes to mind? It's change. [00:19:17] change. It's destruction, it's fires. [00:19:20] fires. One of my most beloved parts [00:19:23] parts of California is the Sequoia [00:19:25] Sequoia groves. These trees are incredible. [00:19:27] incredible. They have seen so much. [00:19:29] much. They have been around for thousands [00:19:32] thousands of years, and we tend to [00:19:34] to think of them as indestructible. [00:19:37] indestructible. And they have been been indestructible for their entire [00:19:40] entire long history. They're very very resistant to fire. In fact, [00:19:44] fact, they need fire. Fire helps helps them grow. Fire helps them [00:19:47] them spread. But now the fires are [00:19:50] are changing. The summers are hotter. [00:19:52] hotter. The winters are wetter and [00:19:55] and there's more fuel and there's there's more fire weather so that [00:19:58] that the fuel can go up in flames. [00:20:01] flames. And this is creating conditions conditions that make it very hard [00:20:05] hard for these things that have survived [00:20:08] survived for centuries and centuries centuries to continue into the future. [00:20:11] future. And so knowing the connection connection between what's happening [00:20:15] happening in the atmosphere, which [00:20:17] which can seem so far away and so [00:20:20] so abstract, and just seeing how how it is affecting these things things that you grew up thinking [00:20:24] thinking would be there forever is [00:20:27] is is very quietly devastating. I I think. Your book is about nine [00:20:30] nine emotions. Can you talk me through [00:20:34] through those nine emotions? So I [00:20:35] I wanted to start out with wonder [00:20:38] wonder because that for me is the the emotion that I feel the most [00:20:41] most every day. I'm a scientist. [00:20:43] scientist. It is my job to find out [00:20:45] out new things about this planet. planet. And I used to be an astrophysicist. [00:20:49] astrophysicist. I used to be a cosmologist cosmologist and it was my job to [00:20:53] to study the entire universe. And And then the more you know about [00:20:57] about the universe, the more you [00:20:59] you realise how much most of it sucks. [00:21:02] sucks. All of the other planets that that we know of are complete garbage, [00:21:05] garbage, and the earth is the only [00:21:08] only good place in the universe. [00:21:11] universe. And so just realising that that and realising how beautiful [00:21:15] beautiful and perfect this planet planet is just sort of fills me with [00:21:18] with a sense of wonder every day. [00:21:20] day. And then the second chapter [00:21:22] chapter is anger because you see [00:21:25] see the world changing. You know know how well-established the science [00:21:29] science is and you see people lying lying about that. And that makes [00:21:33] makes me angry. And then I talk about [00:21:36] about guilt. I talk about fear. I [00:21:40] I talk about grief. But then I also [00:21:43] also wanted to talk about maybe the [00:21:45] the more positive emotions. So surprise, [00:21:50] surprise, pride, both in the sense sense of hubris, but also in the [00:21:53] the sense of we know what to do. do. And there is, I think, something [00:21:56] something important in feeling pride [00:21:57] pride in a job well done. And then [00:22:01] then hope, an emotion that I think think all climate people have really [00:22:04] really complicated relationships relationships with. And then I felt [00:22:07] felt very strongly about ending the [00:22:09] the book on love because that is [00:22:12] is the reason that any of this matters. matters. Can you talk to me about [00:22:15] about that complicated relationship relationship you have with Hope? Hope? What is it that's giving? Yeah, [00:22:18] Yeah, because I was going to say say a lot of people look to the future, future, don't they? And they have [00:22:22] have fear. They have anxiety about [00:22:23] about what's to come. But hope. Yeah. [00:22:26] Yeah. Is that what you see when you you look to the future? We know what [00:22:30] what to do. And so if we want to [00:22:33] to avoid the worst, if we want to to build a better future, we know [00:22:36] know what to do. I actually find [00:22:39] find a lot of hope and comfort in [00:22:42] in how solid the science is. We know [00:22:45] know exactly what is causing climate climate change, and that means that [00:22:49] that we know exactly how to stop [00:22:50] stop it. And so that is the thing [00:22:53] thing that gives me a kind of active, [00:22:56] active, motivating hope. You say [00:22:57] say we know what we need to do, but [00:23:01] but what is that exactly? Yeah. So [00:23:03] So from a, you physical science perspective [00:23:06] perspective up in the atmosphere, atmosphere, it's really simple. Climate [00:23:09] Climate change is caused by greenhouse greenhouse gases. Greenhouse gases [00:23:12] gases are emitted by humans to stop [00:23:14] stop climate change. Stop doing that. [00:23:17] that. Now obviously that is much [00:23:19] much easier said than done, but I [00:23:21] I think it helps to zoom in and to [00:23:25] to look at where we are, where those [00:23:27] those emissions are coming from right? [00:23:29] right? Those emissions are coming [00:23:31] coming from the way we get around around from transportation. They're [00:23:35] They're coming from the way that that we generate electricity. They're [00:23:38] They're coming from the way that [00:23:40] that we use land and farm and make [00:23:44] make our food. They're coming from [00:23:45] from the way we heat buildings and [00:23:48] and cook that food. And they're coming [00:23:50] coming from the way we make stuff. stuff. Industrial processes. And [00:23:53] And when you break it down to that that level of granularity, you start [00:23:57] start to realise, oh, there is a [00:24:00] a solution for nearly every part [00:24:03] part of that puzzle. Electricity. [00:24:06] Electricity. Well, we have different different ways to make electricity. [00:24:09] electricity. When you think about [00:24:10] about fossil fuels, what they really [00:24:13] really are is solar energy, but stupid. [00:24:16] stupid. So you can either make electricity [00:24:20] electricity from solar energy directly [00:24:22] directly with solar panels or you [00:24:25] you can use that solar energy to [00:24:26] to make a plant photosynthesise eventually eventually that plant gets eaten [00:24:30] eaten and the thing that ate it dies dies or the plant dies and it's got [00:24:34] got the remnants of that last meal meal still in it. And then you wait [00:24:38] wait hundreds of millions of years years and then you dig up and you [00:24:40] you set it on fire. So we can either either use sunlight in that really [00:24:43] really indirect way, or we can use [00:24:46] use sunlight in a direct way. The [00:24:48] The world has changed so much since [00:24:50] since the beginning of my career. [00:24:53] career. If you had told me when I [00:24:54] I first started in climate science [00:24:58] science that eventually solar it it won't be a boutique niche energy [00:25:02] energy source for hippies, it's going going to be the cheapest way of generating [00:25:05] generating electricity in all of [00:25:07] of history. They're going to be cheap cheap electric cars, and they're [00:25:11] they're going to be better than gas [00:25:13] gas powered cars. Battery storage [00:25:16] storage prices are going to be plummeting. plummeting. If you had told me all [00:25:19] all of those things, I would think, think, no, no, no, there's no possible [00:25:22] possible way that that can be true. true. That's just, you know, that's [00:25:25] that's way, way, way too optimistic. [00:25:28] optimistic. So we have solutions solutions for generating electricity. [00:25:31] electricity. We have solutions for for transportation. And I could go [00:25:35] go on and on and on, but for every [00:25:38] every single aspect, every single single area where emissions come [00:25:42] come from, we have the vast majority majority of the solutions that we [00:25:45] we need to do that differently. Professor [00:25:47] Professor Kip Marvel, thank you so so much for joining us today. Thank [00:25:51] Thank you so much. Yeah, thank you you so much. Really appreciate it. [00:25:54] it. And thank you for watching. And And don't forget you can subscribe [00:25:58] subscribe to the BBC World Service Service YouTube channel so you don't [00:26:00] don't miss a thing. And if you have have a climate question of your own [00:26:03] own that you'd like us to answer, answer, we have a listener's question [00:26:06] question show coming up very soon. [00:26:08] soon. We'll see you next time. [00:28:22] Trump's plan to get the oil flowing flowing again, one that will pay [00:28:25] pay off? Join us on Talking Business [00:28:28] Business weekly on BBC News. I lost [00:28:35] lost my [00:28:39] I lost my sight completely when I was eight years old. This is a a moment in the history of the United [00:28:43] United States. My name is Gary O'Donoghue O'Donoghue and I'm the chief North North America correspondent for the [00:28:46] the BBC. As you can see, we're on on the ground behind our car, which [00:28:49] which is not ideal, but that's the the shelter we have at the moment [00:28:53] moment during the Trump assassination assassination attempt. I think my [00:28:55] my blindness was an interesting factor factor because one of the central [00:28:58] central interviews we got was with with the eyewitness, Greg. I learned [00:29:02] learned afterwards look pretty striking. striking. Secret service is looking looking at us from the top of the [00:29:06] the barn. I'm pointing at that roof. roof. You spend your whole life interpreting [00:29:09] interpreting the world through what what you hear. Because I can't see. [00:29:12] see. I just listen to what he says. says. I listened and I asked the the same questions over and over [00:29:15] over again. He remained consistent. consistent. He sounded credible. credible. It was the thing that persuaded [00:29:19] persuaded me his listening and telling telling stories. That is the core [00:29:22] core of what we do. We get the experience experience of all people we serve [00:29:26] serve because we have people of all [00:29:29] all kinds in this organisation. [00:30:13] Live from Washington. This is [00:30:16] BBC News. Ukraine's president repeats [00:30:18] repeats his plea for more missiles [00:30:20] missiles to intercept air strikes strikes after another deadly Russian [00:30:23] Russian attack just outside the capital, [00:30:26] capital, Kyiv, as cases of Ebola [00:30:29] Ebola pass 4000 in D.r.congo. The [00:30:31] The head of Africa CDC tells the [00:30:33] the BBC the outbreak could become [00:30:36] become the largest the world has [00:30:38] has ever seen and football's world [00:30:40] world governing body Fifa responds responds as questions mount about [00:30:44] about president Gianni Infantino. [00:30:46] Infantino. Personal and professional [00:30:48] professional conduct. [00:30:59] Helena Humphrey. Good to have