BBCPERSIAN — broadcast
20260806 233000 UTC
445 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:01] Many claims that certainly, certainly
[00:00:05] the Islamic Republic has supported them and in
[00:00:08] fact, has not left their pockets empty. These actions are done with money.
[00:00:12] Where does this money come from? Yemen, where the Houthis
[00:00:15] are not very rich.
[00:00:18] So these monies have come out of the pockets of the Iranian people.
[00:00:22] The fact that we are in what time and what
[00:00:25] situation it is,
[00:00:28] this does not allow us to violate the rights of the Iranian people
[00:00:32] who today are living in poverty and
[00:00:35] misery. In fact, the word "misery" should be used.
[00:00:39] They are living. The result of this policy is the impoverishment
[00:00:42] of the Iranian people and the enrichment
[00:00:45] and preparation for a war in which the Iranian people
[00:00:49] actually have no share.
[00:00:52] This is the result of these policies. Now, no matter how we want to
[00:00:56] justify it, this
[00:00:58] reality of the field cannot be overlooked.
[00:01:02] Thank you very much, Mr. Salehi, we are eagerly
[00:01:06] awaiting your answer. Yes,
[00:01:08] you see, insiders and outsiders in the region
[00:01:12] determine geopolitical changes. I was explaining that
[00:01:16] the good relationship between Iran and Egypt in the 70s caused Al-Azhar,
[00:01:19] the Mufti of Al-Azhar, to fundamentally recognize Shiism and
[00:01:23] Twelver Shiism as one of the five official schools
[00:01:26] of Islam for the first time. This was a political issue.
[00:01:41] Extensive investments have been made in the Houthis, and as
[00:01:44] his words suggested, apparently this
[00:01:48] investment has not brought any return for the Iranian nation, in his opinion, and currently
[00:01:51] the nation is struggling with special economic problems.
[00:01:55] What do you say? Iran is strategically
[00:01:58] isolated in the region. That is why, by relying
[00:02:01] on allied groups
[00:02:05] that exist structurally in the region
[00:02:08] and have united, and due to common
[00:02:11] interests that it has with these groups, it has been able to have
[00:02:15] a regional deterrent power or geopolitical
[00:02:18] use of the structural identity of the region.
[00:02:22] Certainly, the role of Iran's
[00:02:25] allied groups in the region, whether in Lebanon, Iraq, or Yemen,
[00:02:29] has been influential in the 40-day war
[00:02:32] and in preventing the so-called
[00:02:35] fragmentation of Iran and preventing
[00:02:38] the demands of Mr. Trump, who
[00:02:40] called for
[00:02:43] the annihilation of Iranian civilization and the change of Iran's
[00:02:46] geography. Let's discuss this with Mr. Karbasi.
[00:02:50] Mr. Karbasi, do you believe that this investment has had no return? Mr.
[00:02:54] Salehi clearly believes that this investment has yielded results and
[00:02:57] has even prevented the disintegration of Iran.
[00:03:07] Why do you think this investment for the Houthis has not had a return for the nation?
[00:03:09] This
[00:03:11] is very clear, meaning it doesn't need proof
[00:03:15] that the situation of the Iranian people is
[00:03:18] in what state they are.
[00:03:22] And those sections of groups or in
[00:03:25] Lebanon, in Hamas, which even ideologically differed,
[00:03:28] what support did Iran give?
[00:03:31] The Houthis, Hashd al-Shaabi, all these
[00:03:35] are in fact today, when Iran is in this
[00:03:38] situation, which is also the result of the policies
[00:03:41] of the Islamic Republic, this is a product
[00:03:45] of their actions, not the people's. The people are actually
[00:03:49] victims of these policies. If
[00:03:52] money has gone out of their pockets it has gone
[00:03:55] to a place that actually has no benefit, neither today
[00:03:59] nor tomorrow, for the people of Iran, nor for the government.
[00:04:02] Excuse me, if a situation were to arise where fewer bombs were dropped
[00:04:05] on Iran, do you think it wouldn't be good for the people? After all, the Houthis and groups
[00:04:09] are providing some help to the Islamic Republic in this regard.
[00:04:13] I am certainly but these bombs are not being dropped on the heads
[00:04:17] of these people. They are being dropped somewhere else.
[00:04:20] That is, today
[00:04:23] they attacked another part of Yemen, they attack the territory of Saudi Arabia,
[00:04:27] they attack Kuwait, they attack other countries. They attack, which
[00:04:31] paves the way for further attacks. It is not supposed that if
[00:04:34] an agreement is made today,
[00:04:37] it will last because there is no stability
[00:04:41] in the region. The policy that the Islamic Republic
[00:04:45] is pursuing is a policy of unrest
[00:04:48] and tension in the region. In fact, one day,
[00:04:51] which will not be far off, it will seize
[00:04:54] the collars of the Iranian people because this
[00:04:57] is the result of a policy of.
[00:05:02] That means seeking war actually cannot
[00:05:05] guarantee security for the people of Iran. My point
[00:05:09] is that this investment by the Islamic Republic will not
[00:05:13] yield any results for the Iranian people
[00:05:16] at any time. Yes, Mr. Khansari, when we talk about
[00:05:20] the Houthis, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Middle East region, as the English say,
[00:05:23] there is an elephant in the room that is rarely talked about,
[00:05:27] but it is very important: Saudi Arabia. Considering the events that have happened
[00:05:31] and the situation that has arisen, let's take all factors into account.
[00:05:34] That is, attacks have happened, the Islamic Republic has not fallen,
[00:05:38] Saudi Arabia has faced problems due to the Strait of Hormuz,
[00:05:41] and the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf.
[00:05:45] Considering all of this, what do you think their reaction will be to their war
[00:05:49] with the Houthis? And if the issue becomes serious and, for example,
[00:05:52] the Houthis close the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, will Saudi Arabia enter
[00:05:56] that region or not? I
[00:06:00] don't think
[00:06:02] that things will go that far, because I think
[00:06:06] there is a high probability that an agreement will be reached
[00:06:10] in the coming days and weeks. One cannot
[00:06:13] set a date. It is much more likely that
[00:06:17] this agreement will be reached. And of course, the agreement must be implemented,
[00:06:21] but I think that this willingness exists.
[00:06:24] But you see, the point that Mr. Karbasi makes is that if we have been fighting the Islamic Republic for 47
[00:06:28] years to criticize all these
[00:06:32] flaws, those flaws are not being presented in that form now.
[00:06:35] Well, it's obvious that the Iranian people have been harmed
[00:06:38] due to wrong policies. But if we assume
[00:06:42] that the Islamic Republic's government was a conventional government,
[00:06:46] this investment that, let's say, it made in the Houthis,
[00:06:50] it could have gone like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and
[00:06:53] the UAE and bought F-15s, F-35s, and so on.
[00:06:56] Which is also what, let's say, happened during the Shah's time, when
[00:07:00] the Shah's opponents said that he had impoverished the nation
[00:07:04] because he had bought these weapons and these toys.
[00:07:08] Every country needs
[00:07:11] a defense. A defense that they
[00:07:15] could have had, which my dear
[00:07:18] friend uses the term geopolitics.
[00:07:21] In the current geopolitical situation,
[00:07:24] they could have used these proxies to protect themselves in a way,
[00:07:28] and instead of investing in F-35 aircraft,
[00:07:32] they invested in them. Now, in
[00:07:35] the current situation, these proxies,
[00:07:39] it is true that Hamas is almost completely eliminated,
[00:07:42] and Hezbollah is almost out of action,
[00:07:46] although it is still somewhat useful
[00:07:49] for the Islamic Republic, but in any case, it is
[00:07:53] a lever to prevent additional attacks
[00:07:57] on Iran. Why doesn't America attack Iran?
[00:08:00] It's not simply because Mr. Trump doesn't intend
[00:08:04] to kill Iranians. It's not because we saw that he came
[00:08:08] and killed 56,000 people and caused
[00:08:10] $350 billion
[00:08:13] in damage to our country. How does
[00:08:17] that fit in? Let's see what Mr.
[00:08:20] Karbasi's answer is to these challenges that you
[00:08:24] raised about his opinions and analysis. Mr.
[00:08:27] Karbasi, meaning, in fact, with this
[00:08:31] argument, we have
[00:08:33] an eternal war. Meaning the Islamic
[00:08:37] Republic should not buy weapons and should help
[00:08:41] its proxies to create a proper
[00:08:44] deterrence. Meaning this war will continue forever.
[00:08:47] Please, Mr. Excuse me, we can't hear
[00:08:51] you, Mr. Khansari, please speak a little louder. I said
[00:08:54] that this statement of his, in my opinion, is a
[00:08:57] little inaccurate. They don't sell
[00:09:00] weapons to Iran. Iran cannot go and buy weapons
[00:09:04] like Saudi Arabia, even from Russia.
[00:09:07] The same S-300.
[00:09:10] As Mr. Karbasi says,
[00:09:14] you have actually reversed the cause and effect, I think.
[00:09:18] This situation, in his view, is a result
[00:09:21] of the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic and the isolation of the Islamic Republic.
[00:09:25] We live with realities. The Islamic Republic, because
[00:09:29] of the very reasons you mentioned,
[00:09:32] has been forced to choose this path to defend itself and
[00:09:36] to defend the existing situation because that path is completely closed
[00:09:39] to it. That path is open to
[00:09:43] all Arab countries of the Persian Gulf,
[00:09:46] but it has been closed to the Islamic Republic. So what should it do?
[00:09:49] If you look from their perspective, I don't
[00:09:53] want to justify that policy, but
[00:09:56] these grand slogans that, yes, this has been detrimental to the Iranian nation,
[00:10:00] this has come out of the pockets of the Iranian nation, these generalizations
[00:10:04] have no place in this discussion now, at this time
[00:10:07] when our country is in a situation where further attacks
[00:10:10] and greater harm to our country must be prevented.
[00:10:14] In my opinion, this is not the time. Not that
[00:10:18] his argument is wrong, his argument is correct,
[00:10:21] but this argument, if Mr. Karbasi, I don't know how many years he has been in this field.
[00:10:45] The Iranian nation. One of the problems that Iran
[00:10:49] currently has in the international community is the behaviors of the Islamic
[00:10:51] Republic which sometimes do not align with some of the norms
[00:10:55] and values institutionalized in this society.
[00:10:59] And this criticism causes the Islamic Republic to weaken,
[00:11:02] and consequently, Iran's security is also endangered.
[00:11:06] Let's not forget that, after all, the Houthi government is not recognized
[00:11:10] by the United Nations, and Iran is the only country that recognizes
[00:11:13] the Houthis as the legitimate government of Yemen.
[00:11:16] Now, considering all these statements, evaluate
[00:11:19] the pros and cons of the matter for us. Let's see what you think.
[00:11:23] One. Before the start of this war, the Strait of Hormuz was open,
[00:11:27] Bab el-Mandeb was open, Iran's relations with all Arab
[00:11:30] countries were excellent, Houthi relations with Arab
[00:11:34] countries had improved, they had a peace treaty,
[00:11:36] and more importantly, one day before this
[00:11:40] war, a fair
[00:11:43] and equitable agreement was on the table
[00:11:46] between Iran and the US to assure the US that
[00:11:49] Iran is not pursuing nuclear weapons. However,
[00:11:53] it was the US and Israel who decided to attack Iran
[00:11:56] and become the cause of instability throughout the region.
[00:12:00] The norm of the region is not for Israel to slaughter
[00:12:04] 72,000 Palestinians, to kill
[00:12:07] over 30,000 women and children. Those who attacked Iran
[00:12:11] are war criminals themselves and have committed war crimes during these
[00:12:15] 40 days. From Minab school,
[00:12:18] from Lamert school, from the grilled chicken
[00:12:21] restaurant where all the staff
[00:12:25] were women, you see, the norm of the region is not that you
[00:12:28] have an agreement and a treaty and then withdraw from it,
[00:12:32] impose a merciless
[00:12:35] sanction against the people of Iran, and I repeat, against
[00:12:39] the people of Iran, with the hope that Iran
[00:12:43] will be brought to its knees, and when it doesn't, with an
[00:12:47] inhumane and uncivilized behavior,
[00:12:50] you demand the annihilation of Iranian civilization, the Stone Age-ification
[00:12:54] of Iran, the change of Iran's
[00:12:57] geography, and call those who
[00:13:00] help, like the Shiites throughout the region, terrorists,
[00:13:04] which is your right. But in the end, the price that Iran
[00:13:08] has paid for its allies
[00:13:10] is much less than what it has gained. If the Bab el-Mandeb issue
[00:13:14] didn't exist, if there were no other
[00:13:17] threats in the region, if to enter
[00:13:21] an asymmetric war, there was an $8 billion
[00:13:24] defense military budget for Iran
[00:13:27] against a $120 billion defense military budget
[00:13:31] for Israel and the US, Iran would certainly
[00:13:34] have been forced to use its geopolitical
[00:13:37] powers, to use geography, and
[00:13:41] to use the element of time. Security
[00:13:45] cannot be bought with F-35 F-15
[00:13:49] aircraft. Indigenous and sustainable security must
[00:13:52] exist, which Iran has achieved. A stable
[00:13:56] security. I don't think you are saying
[00:13:59] stable security, while we know that in Iran there is a
[00:14:03] very powerful current among citizens who are against
[00:14:06] this political system and fundamentally seek its overthrow,
[00:14:10] even pursuing a revolution
[00:14:13] to overthrow this system. That's why your statement that
[00:14:16] stable security is achieved through indigenous
[00:14:19] connections or popular support
[00:14:23] has no evidence.
[00:14:27] Look, I'm talking about external threat security. And when
[00:14:31] I say security must be indigenous, I mean the military,
[00:14:34] defensive, and security structure must be domestic, and
[00:14:38] no weapons purchase. The Shah definitely bought
[00:14:41] weapons, and in the Iran-Iraq war, it caused exactly...
[00:14:45] No, no, not at all. The Shah only bought very advanced
[00:14:48] and expensive weapons, which led to increasing his dependence on America.
[00:14:52] All Iranian military personnel
[00:14:55] were trained in America, and 2,000 American
[00:14:59] technicians were in Iran, which fundamentally led to the army being
[00:15:02] under the control of American security forces. And that's
[00:15:06] why, at a crucial historical moment, the army declared neutrality,
[00:15:09] but within a year, Mr. Salehi, in a very
[00:15:13] short time, the same army resists in a completely unexpected way.
[00:15:17] A large part of that army's training, equipment,
[00:15:20] and structure is from the Imperial Army,
[00:15:23] and we saw this.
[00:15:37] We should also discuss, Mr. Karbasi, Mr. Salehi says you should look at these crimes that are
[00:15:41] happening. In fact, in his opinion, very great
[00:15:44] oppressions that truly, not only
[00:15:47] him, but many experts believe are war crimes.
[00:15:50] Even if experts don't say it's a war crime, we saw with our own eyes
[00:15:54] they hit Minam, and in
[00:15:57] these circumstances, you can use such tools
[00:16:00] like your connection with paramilitary groups or the investments
[00:16:04] you made of this kind to push the enemy back. Don't
[00:16:08] forget that the Houthis, after all, are in a very special position where they
[00:16:12] can truly affect the global economy as much as the Strait of Hormuz.
[00:16:15] With this in mind, do you still think that
[00:16:19] this method is not correct?
[00:16:22] Look, the issue is not today. That is, if
[00:16:25] we go back in time,
[00:16:29] when the Islamic Republic was not at war,
[00:16:32] meaning the day after the victory of the revolution,
[00:16:35] Iran is right. The Islamic Republic
[00:16:38] from that time started exporting the revolution
[00:16:41] and creating a philosophy for its existence
[00:16:45] and gathering people around it. This is history,
[00:16:49] and it cannot be denied. In fact, what we see today
[00:16:52] the Islamic Republic is doing has a price.
[00:16:56] If it has entered a war, neither the Iranian people
[00:16:59] wanted it, nor the regional countries,
[00:17:03] but this was a policy
[00:17:07] that ultimately led to this point.
[00:17:10] If the Houthis or Hezbollah in Lebanon, or Hashd al-Shaabi, or any other
[00:17:13] group is defending this today, or is helping
[00:17:17] the policies of the Islamic Republic, in fact, part of it is
[00:17:20] for their own survival, so that they can remain, because
[00:17:24] the money of the Islamic Republic is sustaining them.
[00:17:28] If the Houthis are helping the policy
[00:17:31] of the Islamic Republic today, it is actually working as a weapon
[00:17:35] to preserve the survival of the Islamic Republic.
[00:17:39] This price, in fact,
[00:17:42] is a price for the destruction of Iran,
[00:17:45] Iran's infrastructure. Right now, Iran no longer has Zobahan, it doesn't have
[00:17:49] petrochemicals, which need to be built with billions of dollars.
[00:17:53] The price of the Islamic Republic's policies
[00:17:57] is the destruction of the people,
[00:18:00] Iran's economy, and in fact, the discredit of Iran in the region.
[00:18:04] The last resort, the Strait of Hormuz, is now
[00:18:08] half out of Iran's hands. That is, the exit part, the Oman part.
[00:18:12] This is the result of this policy. Of course, we are not sure yet. No agreement
[00:18:15] has been reached regarding the Strait of Hormuz and how it will be.
[00:18:19] We don't know the details of that agreement, and among us, I think Mr.
[00:18:22] Khansari has actually a truly extraordinary experience
[00:18:26] in diplomacy and, of course, the countries of the region and the Arab
[00:18:29] countries. I will ask you the last question, Mr. Khansari, what is your
[00:18:32] assessment of the influence of the Houthis on the negotiations?
[00:18:36] Can they actually have an effect and
[00:18:40] become a serious card for the Islamic Republic
[00:18:43] in this issue of agreement or peace that everyone is seeking?
[00:18:47] Look, directly,
[00:18:50] certainly not, but collectively,
[00:18:54] it must be considered that in these past few months, nearly 11 million
[00:18:58] barrels of oil have been removed from
[00:19:01] the market due to the closure of the Strait of
[00:19:04] Hormuz. Saudi Arabia, which delivered
[00:19:07] its oil, some four to five million,
[00:19:10] through a pipeline that reached the Red Sea,
[00:19:14] was able, to some extent, to deliver its oil
[00:19:18] to the oil market. The actions that the
[00:19:21] Houthis are taking
[00:19:24] are putting more pressure on America to resolve
[00:19:28] this issue and bring it to an end,
[00:19:32] so that the world economy does not
[00:19:35] experience the worst conditions.
[00:19:41] So, indirectly, yes. But the fundamental issue is that
[00:19:43] the issue of us, the Iranian people,
[00:19:47] with the Islamic Republic is a separate
[00:19:50] issue from the issue
[00:19:53] of Iran with the countries that attack
[00:19:57] Iran. We Iranians must
[00:20:00] clarify our stance with the Islamic Republic,
[00:20:03] not by America or Israel wanting to bombard
[00:20:07] it, so that
[00:20:10] through that, let's say, changes occur, which haven't.
[00:20:13] It has been shown that this approach has failed. So these two
[00:20:17] should not be mixed. They should be considered separate. The Islamic Republic
[00:20:21] is currently in a position
[00:20:24] where if those pragmatic forces, instead of dogmatic
[00:20:27] forces, can control
[00:20:31] this arena and reach an agreement,
[00:20:34] it can lead to a very different
[00:20:38] fate for Iran and the Iranian people. Thank you very much. I
[00:20:42] will ask the same question to Mr. Karbasi and Mr. Salehi. We have little time. About
[00:20:46] one minute. Mr. Salehi, first, you please speak. Do you really think that the Houthis can have an impact?
[00:21:20] and drones with a range of 200 kilometers that
[00:21:23] can cover the expanse from Khorramshahr to Chabahar.
[00:21:26] Thank you very much. Mr. Salehi, thank you.
[00:21:30] Excuse me for interrupting you, but I had to give Mr. Karbasi a chance to
[00:21:34] answer this question as well.
[00:21:36] Yes,
[00:21:38] in my opinion, the Houthis can indeed have an impact.
[00:21:42] Hashd al-Shaabi and other groups can also have an impact because
[00:21:45] it is a pressure card, and
[00:21:48] in fact, especially the Houthis at this point in time,
[00:21:51] by the pressure they can exert on Saudi Arabia and
[00:21:54] the global economy, they can have a significant impact.
[00:21:58] Thank you very much. Thank you to all three guests
[00:22:02] of the program, Mehrdad Khansari, Alam Salehi, and
[00:22:05] Fardin Karbasi, who were with us
[00:22:08] in this program. I hope that at least some
[00:22:11] of your questions have been answered. Until
[00:22:14] the next program,
[00:22:16] goodbye.
[00:22:50] There, I'm small, may God forgive me. Here too,
[00:22:53] it's like this.
[00:23:00] Akbar Aghdi in "The Tenants" this week on
[00:24:50] My dear, you're on YouTube too.
[00:24:52] Oh no, it's summer again.
[00:24:54] The kids' screen time is driving us crazy. All of you sitting here, that cooler is on
[00:24:58] over there. If you have children or children
[00:25:01] are around you, you are well familiar
[00:25:03] with the main problem of modern
[00:25:06] parents: screen time and the many apps that children
[00:25:10] always want to use on their phones and tablets, from Instagram to YouTube.
[00:25:13] It seems that the opinion of those who say these apps should be taken away from children
[00:25:17] is gaining more strength in various parts of the world. But is
[00:25:21] that really the solution? In recent months, various countries
[00:25:24] have been enacting laws that prohibit or severely
[00:25:28] restrict children's access to social networks.
[00:25:31] One of the latest is the UK government,
[00:25:35] which has said that from next year, social networking apps must block
[00:25:39] access for children under 16,
[00:25:42] otherwise they will face heavy fines. This reaction
[00:25:45] from a student gained a lot of attention on social media.
[00:25:50] over the weekend, nine hours, nine hours, so suddenly you're going
[00:25:53] to have a lot more time to fill, and what will you
[00:25:56] do? Start a
[00:25:58] wall.
[00:26:01] Now that social media
[00:26:07] supporters of these greater restrictions remind us that over the past decade,
[00:26:11] concurrently with the growth and prosperity of social
[00:26:14] media, the rates of anxiety and depression and mental
[00:26:17] health problems among teenagers have risen. The statistics we have
[00:26:21] show that using social media for
[00:26:24] a developing and growing brain is like
[00:26:27] a low dose of poison that is used every day. We know this. This
[00:26:31] is happening.
[00:27:02] If we easily blame everything on phones, tablets, and
[00:27:06] social media, we are ignoring more important factors,
[00:27:09] from parents' economic problems and family tensions
[00:27:13] to the crisis of loneliness and lack of mental
[00:27:17] health services, which are, of course, deeper problems and cannot
[00:27:20] be solved overnight with a decree or order. It is not surprising
[00:27:23] that politicians prefer to ban social media
[00:27:27] as a first step, because setting up playgrounds, community centers, and stadiums
[00:27:31] specifically for children is very expensive and takes
[00:27:35] longer to yield results, let alone reducing financial pressure
[00:27:38] on families in general, which is the root of many
[00:27:41] of the problems of recent years for teenagers. This takes a lot of
[00:27:45] work. Critics say blanket bans actually
[00:27:49] put children at greater risk. My concern
[00:27:52] is that children will move to other platforms to communicate
[00:27:56] with each other that have fewer regulations or are
[00:27:59] on the dark web. The ban on social
[00:28:03] media in Australia is still very new, but
[00:28:07] initial surveys show that about two-thirds of children
[00:28:10] do not comply with these bans. They have found ways to still
[00:28:14] access social media, for example, by using
[00:28:17] VPNs.
[00:28:19] Evidence also shows that age verification tools
[00:28:23] are not yet perfect enough to prevent determined
[00:28:26] children. Many people see that children can pressure their parents
[00:28:30] and annoy them so much that in the end, the parents themselves create
[00:28:34] adult accounts for them, and this way, other children also
[00:28:37] do not face the same restrictions as teenage accounts.
[00:28:41] This is why the main question might not be whether banning
[00:28:44] social media for children works or not. The more important question is
[00:28:48] how can we create a healthier relationship between these future
[00:28:52] generations and technology? The most important principle
[00:28:55] for us to protect our children is to have a relationship
[00:28:59] with them. To have a deep relationship. To have trust in it,
[00:29:03] and then also. to find a replacement
[00:29:06] which might be a bit harder in Iran
[00:29:09] but a replacement for virtual relationships
[00:29:13] can be non-virtual relationships. Right, we can replace
[00:29:16] many other things but
[00:29:20] respectful communication and
[00:29:23] trust are the main keys.
[00:29:26] But what do you think? You can write your opinion
[00:29:30] for me here on Instagram. In your opinion, do these restrictions work? If you
[00:29:34] have a teenager around you, what have you done to help
[00:29:37] them better use online spaces? What other
[00:29:41] solutions come to your mind to improve the situation?