BBCPERSIAN — broadcast 20261105 010000 UTC 454 transcript segments Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record. [00:00:19] Headline [00:00:20] News [00:00:26] The fall of the strongholds of Republicans against [00:00:29] the tsunami of Trump's opponents. Democrats took both houses [00:00:33] of Congress in the midterm elections. They made [00:00:35] it their own. [00:00:42] Trump and Vance acknowledge the impact of the war on the Republican defeat. [00:00:46] The US president, however, still defends his decision to attack [00:00:49] Iran. [00:00:50] Well, [00:00:54] I think this is largely true, because the war in Iran [00:00:57] short-term caused gasoline prices to rise. [00:01:11] Reactions of Iranian officials to the results of the US midterm elections, [00:01:14] from expressing confidence in the continuation of hostility [00:01:18] in the message attributed to Khamenei, to Rezaei's claim of inflicting defeat [00:01:21] on Trump. [00:01:22] And [00:01:29] the behavior of allies and rivals of America with [00:01:32] the results of the American midterm elections. The European Union is [00:01:36] hopeful about supporting Ukraine against Russia. China says [00:01:39] it's an internal issue. [00:02:21] Hello everyone, welcome to another special news segment that [00:02:25] covers the results of the US midterm elections. I'll be with you for the next [00:02:29] half an hour. In the US, Democrats were able to [00:02:33] take control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate [00:02:36] from the Republicans. US President Trump [00:02:39] congratulated the Democrats on their victory in the midterm elections. [00:02:43] He acknowledged that the war with Iran and [00:02:46] its consequences, such as the increase in fuel prices, played a role in his party's [00:02:50] defeat. [00:02:53] Well, I think this is largely [00:02:57] true, because the war in Iran short-term caused gasoline prices [00:03:01] to go up a bit. So it's probably true, but at the same [00:03:05] time, if I was in the same situation again, I would still [00:03:08] have to do the same thing, because in the long term, this is the only [00:03:12] way to prevent Iran from [00:03:13] getting nuclear weapons. [00:03:16] That was Donald Trump, but one of the surprises of this round of competition was the unprecedented victories [00:03:20] of Democrats in states that for decades [00:03:23] were considered strongholds of Republicans. In this [00:03:26] election, some firsts were also achieved. [00:03:30] Abdul El-Sayed, the candidate of the Democratic Party in Michigan, is the first [00:03:33] Muslim to enter the US Senate. Hakeem Jeffries is also expected [00:03:37] to become the first black speaker of the House [00:03:41] of Representatives. Also, Keisha Lance Bottoms will be the first [00:03:44] black female governor in US history. [00:03:48] Manoush Pourzizi, my colleague from the US Congress, is with [00:03:52] us. Manoush, Mr. Trump himself is now in a way confirming [00:03:55] that the war is what caused this [00:03:59] situation and this result that was achieved in this election. [00:04:02] Mr. Vance also previously stated this [00:04:06] issue more clearly. Should we conclude that [00:04:10] Republicans agree on [00:04:13] this matter? [00:04:16] Look, there is no doubt that the war [00:04:19] and the increase in energy prices, and consequently [00:04:22] the inflation that has occurred in the US, and the pain that it has caused [00:04:26] people in the US when spending, has had a very widespread [00:04:30] and significant impact [00:04:32] on their decision and their vote. Whether Mr. Vance [00:04:36] said this in coordination with Donald Trump, we really don't know. [00:04:40] Was it an attempt [00:04:43] to save Mr. Vance's own political future [00:04:47] by trying to distance himself from this historic defeat [00:04:50] of the Republicans, or is it a sign [00:04:53] of a change in the White House's perspective? I don't think [00:04:56] it's a sign of a change in the White House's perspective overall. [00:05:00] Mr. Trump has, until just a few days ago, [00:05:03] participated in 21 states in 21 election trips [00:05:07] and election campaigns. In all of them, [00:05:11] most of them, he said [00:05:13] that this situation [00:05:16] regarding the increase in prices and [00:05:20] the concerns that have arisen regarding the increase in prices are the work of Democrats. [00:05:24] At one point, he blamed the price of diesel and gasoline [00:05:27] on Ukraine and has always [00:05:30] said that America is making billions [00:05:33] of dollars from this war. You don't know how rich your country [00:05:37] has become. This is something that the American [00:05:39] people have not [00:05:43] connected with. The expectation that American voters [00:05:46] had from Mr. Trump and his party was not this. This is the answer [00:05:50] we can, in my opinion, take. American farmers [00:05:53] voted for Mr. Trump for three terms in his first presidency, [00:05:57] in his attempt for a second term, [00:06:01] and also in his second presidency, [00:06:04] farmers voted for him. This time they didn't vote for him [00:06:07] because they are a group that is severely affected by the consequences [00:06:11] of the war in Iran. From the price of chemical fertilizers, which [00:06:15] has skyrocketed after [00:06:18] the problems that arose for the transportation of chemical fertilizers from the Strait of Hormuz, [00:06:22] to the cost of diesel and other costs. [00:06:25] The young men who, in alliance with other groups [00:06:28] during Mr. Trump's previous term, brought him [00:06:32] to the White House, this time did not show much enthusiasm for him [00:06:35] because most of them are people who are not in favor [00:06:39] of war and do not want America to get involved in war again [00:06:43] and create a prospect for them [00:06:46] that might mean fighting in other countries. [00:06:50] All of these together [00:06:53] have actually shown the response [00:06:57] of Mr. Trump's policies and his performance [00:07:01] in implementing those policies, which, in my opinion, [00:07:04] reflects the American people's response to him. [00:07:06] What impact might the result of this election [00:07:09] have on the decision [00:07:15] to resume this war again? [00:07:18] In the [00:07:23] short term, it will take almost [00:07:26] two months for the Democrats to come to Congress. [00:07:30] Therefore, before that, Mr. Trump will have [00:07:33] a much freer hand to direct [00:07:37] the war order in any direction he wants. The military arrangement [00:07:40] that is currently in the Persian Gulf is almost [00:07:44] reaching its ideal state. We know that the aircraft [00:07:47] carrier Roosevelt is moving towards the [00:07:51] so-called CENTCOM area or Central Command, which [00:07:54] includes the Middle East, and [00:07:58] in fact, he is still defending his Secretary of Defense, Pit Hexed, and [00:08:02] his war commanders. And also, [00:08:05] as you said, he is emphasizing that if he were [00:08:09] faced with that previous choice again, he would [00:08:13] still choose war with Iran. Therefore, at least [00:08:16] what we see openly is that nothing has changed in the mindset [00:08:20] of the White House and Mr. Trump. The possibility of Republicans [00:08:23] wanting to get closer to Democrats in the remaining [00:08:27] two months and in an alliance with [00:08:30] them to somewhat limit the war [00:08:33] budget for Mr. Trump, they should [00:08:36] impose financial restrictions on him to bind his [00:08:40] hands and feet for escalating the war, at least to some extent. This is a [00:08:44] possibility, but until it happens, we cannot comment on it. Thank you [00:08:48] Mahrosh Pozyai, my colleague from the US Congress, [00:08:51] is with us. [00:08:54] Bahreng Tajdin, my colleague, has also looked at what happened in this election and [00:08:58] the results obtained so far. Many polls [00:09:01] predicted that the 2026 midterm elections would result [00:09:05] in a Democratic victory, but few people [00:09:09] expected their victory to be so widespread. [00:09:12] You see that they gained a majority in both the Senate [00:09:16] and the House of Representatives, despite the fact that the results [00:09:19] for dozens of seats in this chamber are still unknown. [00:09:22] 35 US Senate seats were up for election [00:09:26] and these are the results. [00:09:30] The blue ones were won by Democrats, the red ones [00:09:33] by Republicans. The striped states are where [00:09:37] seats changed hands between the two parties. [00:09:40] Let's start with a historic victory in Kansas, [00:09:44] a state whose seats [00:09:48] in the US Senate have been held by Republicans since 1932, [00:09:51] almost a century ago. But a moderate pastor named [00:09:55] Adam Hamilton changed this trend [00:09:59] after 9 minutes in favor [00:10:01] of the Democrats and won by a margin of about [00:10:04] 44. Another significant state [00:10:07] and another significant victory for Democrats [00:10:11] was in Texas. [00:10:13] Religious and conservative, which is considered one of the traditional bases [00:10:17] of the Republican Party, but James Talarico [00:10:20] succeeded by a margin of about one million votes, [00:10:24] approximately. [00:10:40] These were the victories of Democrats in South Carolina, where until a few months ago, [00:10:44] Lindsey Graham was its senator, someone who in [00:10:47] recent years was active in the debate on US policy towards Iran [00:10:50] and was considered a strong supporter of the US-Israel war [00:10:54] with Iran. Of course, Mr. Graham passed away [00:10:57] a few months ago. His sister, with the support of Donald Trump, became his [00:11:01] successor in the Senate. But Democrats defeated Mrs. Graham, [00:11:05] which was their first victory in such an election in South [00:11:08] Carolina since almost 28 years ago. [00:11:12] Democrats gained Senate seats in other states, [00:11:15] including Iowa and Ohio, where in fact, until just two years [00:11:19] ago, J.D. Vance was their senator. [00:11:22] North Carolina, Maine, [00:11:25] they were also able to take from the Republicans. Only [00:11:29] two states remain. One is Mississippi, where after [00:11:32] counting almost 1 million votes, 96 [00:11:35] percent, the difference between the Democratic candidate and the Republican [00:11:38] candidate is about 65 votes. It is so [00:11:42] close and the result may take a long time. Another one is [00:11:45] Alaska, where the Democratic candidate is ahead [00:11:49] of his rival by about 626 votes. But besides these, [00:11:53] an important historical event also happened in Michigan, a state [00:11:56] whose seat had been held by Democrats [00:12:00] for almost half a century. But in a close internal [00:12:04] competition, Abdulrahman Syed, [00:12:06] known as Abdul El-Sayed (as they say in the US), [00:12:10] managed to win the party's [00:12:13] nomination for this seat in the Democratic [00:12:16] primary election, and now [00:12:20] he will become the first Muslim senator in US history. [00:12:23] With this description, so far, Democrats [00:12:26] have been able to add seven seats to their Senate [00:12:29] seats, and this means [00:12:33] that Democrats will control [00:12:36] the majority of this chamber and the House [00:12:40] of Representatives in the US for the next two years. This [00:12:44] blue wave of Democratic victory in Congress could [00:12:47] make things harder for Donald Trump [00:12:51] in the last two years of his presidency in some ways. [00:12:55] That was Bahreng Tajdin. Jennifer Ewing, spokesperson for the organization [00:12:59] Republicans Abroad in California, is with us. Welcome [00:13:01] to the program. I know that many Republicans [00:13:05] tell Democrats or people [00:13:09] who consider this situation a defeat for Republicans that the sitting [00:13:13] president usually loses the midterm elections, [00:13:16] but this defeat is more than a usual [00:13:20] loss. Democrats won many more seats [00:13:23] than expected, both in the Senate and [00:13:27] in the House of Representatives. How do you explain [00:13:31] this? [00:13:32] Hello, [00:13:38] thank you for inviting me. Yes, it is true [00:13:42] that generally the ruling [00:13:44] party [00:13:48] loses the House of Representatives, but even if we consider [00:13:51] that, this is a big defeat for Republicans. [00:14:25] started in your country, Iran, and [00:14:28] the people, the voters, are now saying that this war is very [00:14:32] unpopular, and also regarding the costs, I don't feel [00:14:35] good about it, and therefore it's very simple. The answer was not [00:14:39] very difficult to guess that this war [00:14:42] would eventually become unpopular in America. What happened that Mr. [00:14:46] Trump and his advisors did not see this issue? Especially my reference [00:14:50] is also to Mr. Vance's statements. We knew he was [00:14:54] against this war before. But now he is saying [00:14:57] with much more frankness what the American voter wants. [00:15:01] He is someone who might lose his chance [00:15:03] for the presidency if things remain the same. [00:15:07] Yes, [00:15:08] your [00:15:17] point is very valid. [00:15:21] If this tweet [00:15:37] is very close to President Trump, [00:15:40] he might have lost hope [00:15:44] for his future. Some [00:15:47] and many, including myself, [00:15:49] were very happy that President Trump chose [00:15:53] him as his vice president because he is against war and [00:15:56] we thought we were voting for someone who [00:16:00] would prioritize America. [00:16:02] And [00:16:04] you are [00:16:34] not that these very issues, both in terms of [00:17:38] the whole country, told him to end this, to [00:17:42] finish this, and my meaning of finishing it is not what some [00:17:45] mean, but rather we mean reducing [00:17:48] tensions and a diplomatic solution. I think this is what he should do. [00:17:51] Thank you, Jennifer Ewing, spokesperson for Republicans Abroad in [00:17:55] Britain. Thank you. [00:17:58] Mehrzad Boroujerdi, professor of political science at Missouri University of Science and [00:18:01] Technology, is also with us. Mr. Boroujerdi, you heard Ms. Ewing's remarks. In her [00:18:05] last sentence, she said it was a big no. [00:18:08] To this war, and voters told Mr. Trump to end this situation. [00:18:12] Do you think he will do such a thing? Does it [00:18:16] seem that this result was a big [00:18:18] gift to the Islamic Republic? [00:18:21] Yes, I think [00:18:24] the Republicans suffered a devastating [00:18:26] electoral defeat. This is probably the biggest [00:18:30] decisive defeat in the US congressional elections in the last [00:18:33] 50 years. And [00:18:38] undoubtedly, the consequences of the war in Iran played a fundamental [00:18:41] role. The increase in gasoline prices [00:18:45] and also the trade tariffs that harmed [00:18:49] American farmers are what we [00:18:51] witnessed the fruits of in yesterday's [00:18:55] elections, so to speak. [00:18:57] In my opinion, yes, Iran can be [00:19:01] the winner of this election for several reasons. [00:19:04] Firstly, the internal divisions within the [00:19:07] Republican Party will intensify from now on. The fact that [00:19:11] Mr. J.D. Vance is trying to distance himself somewhat [00:19:14] from Mr. Trump's position because he has dreams for the next [00:19:18] two years, or other people who might be there, [00:19:21] will cause the scope of these divisions in the party [00:19:25] to increase. In addition, Mr. Trump might, [00:19:28] because he is now angry about the result of this election, or [00:19:32] because he wants to show the public that he is still [00:19:36] in charge, want to escalate [00:19:40] this war again. But the reality is that, in any case, [00:19:43] in two months, with the Democrats coming to power, [00:19:47] and the calculations that will be needed for the continuation of the war, [00:19:50] they will chain Mr. Trump's [00:19:54] hands and feet. Therefore, it can be said that [00:19:57] Mr. Trump's political [00:19:59] airplane is truly grounded after this election. [00:20:02] A question that is currently occupying many minds, and [00:20:06] opinions differ on it, is whether this result [00:20:10] will cause Mr. Trump to reconsider [00:20:13] whether to resume the war with Iran, or whether he will [00:20:17] somehow resume [00:20:20] this war as an act of [00:20:22] revenge. [00:20:24] Look, the reality is that because [00:20:27] we cannot expect how Mr. Trump will [00:20:31] respond to this issue, both possibilities exist. [00:20:34] But I think that last night, he received [00:20:38] a very clear message from American citizens: [00:20:41] if they decide to continue [00:20:44] the war, it will not only affect [00:20:48] Mr. Trump's political life for the remaining two [00:20:52] years, but it will also [00:20:55] seriously challenge his party's ability [00:20:59] to regain control of Congress in the elections [00:21:03] two years from now. And I think [00:21:06] many American politicians who perhaps [00:21:09] until now went along [00:21:13] with Mr. Trump's words out of fear [00:21:15] will henceforth find more courage [00:21:20] to confront him, because many of [00:21:24] them consider him responsible for the blatant defeat [00:21:27] that Republicans suffered yesterday in the elections. [00:21:31] In the message that Mr. Vance posted on social media, [00:21:34] one issue that has attracted a lot of attention is that [00:21:38] the Vice President of the United States is talking about reconsidering his policy [00:21:42] towards Israel. From your perspective, [00:21:45] have American politicians [00:21:48] possibly come to the conclusion that they should reconsider [00:21:52] this? Look, in my opinion, besides the issue of the war [00:21:54] in Iran, the second issue in terms of foreign policy where we [00:21:58] can witness a serious difference in attitude [00:22:02] is undoubtedly the issue of Israel. [00:22:05] Even if Mr. Netanyahu, who currently seems to have lost [00:22:08] the elections, in terms of being able [00:22:12] to form another cabinet, even if he succeeds again, [00:22:15] this time the US Congress will not have the same [00:22:19] stance regarding financial aid to Israel. [00:22:23] Because we saw in the votes how much the view, especially [00:22:27] of the young American generation, has become negative towards [00:22:31] Israel. They do not agree with [00:22:34] the operations that the Israelis carried out in Gaza and so on. [00:22:37] When Democrats control Congress, they can put [00:22:41] more pressure on the government in this regard. The fact that Mr. [00:22:44] Trump has also announced that, for example, [00:22:48] he will cut financial aid to Israel, which we know is the largest [00:22:52] financial aid from the US to any country, will be a response [00:22:56] to the actions that Democrats will take [00:22:59] to truly prevent the good [00:23:02] relations that existed between Mr. Trump and Netanyahu [00:23:06] from continuing for a long time. [00:23:09] Therefore, yes, Israel will also be [00:23:13] another loser in these elections. Thank you, Mehrzad Boroujerdi, [00:23:17] Professor of Political Science at [00:23:20] Missouri University of Science and Technology, [00:23:23] is with us. The website of Mojtaba Khamenei, the leader [00:23:27] of Iran, implicitly referred to the US elections in a written message [00:23:31] from him on the occasion of November 4th, the anniversary of the occupation of the US embassy in Tehran, [00:23:35] and said that if some people have a little hope [00:23:38] for partisan and factional shifts in that country, they are gravely [00:23:41] mistaken. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the speaker of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, also said [00:23:45] that Americans said no to war in these elections, and Iran [00:23:49] also supports this. Mohsen Rezaei, the secretary of the Supreme National [00:23:53] Security Council, also said that the great Iranian nation inflicted [00:23:56] a major strategic defeat on Trump in the battlefield and the Strait of Hormuz, and [00:24:00] also a heavy political defeat in Washington. [00:24:03] Mohammad Amini reports. [00:24:05] The [00:24:10] midterm elections for the US legislative bodies and the heavy [00:24:13] defeat of Republicans are being closely followed in Iran. [00:24:17] Senior [00:24:20] officials of the regime linked the defeat of Trump's party [00:24:23] in this election to the war with Iran. Mojtaba Khamenei, [00:24:27] the leader of the Islamic Republic, who has not been seen in public [00:24:31] since assuming the leadership, reacted to the US elections [00:24:34] in a message on the occasion of November 4th. It is not known [00:24:38] whether he was aware of the results of the US elections [00:24:42] at the time this message was written or not. But in his message, he said [00:24:45] that partisan and factional changes in the US system [00:24:49] will not change that country's hostility [00:24:53] towards Iran. Mojtaba Khamenei [00:24:55] focused more on the war with the US and said [00:24:59] that if the US continues its military actions against Iran, [00:25:03] Iran's response will take on much broader [00:25:07] dimensions. However, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the speaker [00:25:10] of the parliament, made an explicit reference to the results of the US elections. [00:25:14] He wrote on the X network: The American people, whether out of [00:25:18] conscience or under pressure from the cost of living, [00:25:22] said no to war, and we also confirm [00:25:25] this message. He continued that if the US [00:25:29] government disregards the Americans' no, it will face [00:25:32] the Iranians' no, which will appear [00:25:36] in the form of a nightmare. One of Mr. Ghalibaf's deputies [00:25:40] also used the term political defeat. The delusional [00:25:43] American president, who sought victory through bluster [00:25:47] on social media, has also been defeated [00:25:51] in his domestic policy, and these defeats are [00:25:54] aftershocks of the defeat against the Iranian nation. [00:25:58] Media outlets close to the Revolutionary Guard, such as Khabar [00:26:02] Bargozari Tasnim, dedicated their main page to [00:26:06] the US elections and their results. [00:26:08] It is still unclear what the effect of the electoral [00:26:12] defeat of Mr. Trump and the Republicans will be on the US military [00:26:15] plans towards Iran. It has been reported that the US president [00:26:19] has no plans to attack Iran for now. [00:26:23] It may take some time for the Trump administration [00:26:26] to digest the shock of the blue wave tsunami [00:26:30] of Democrats across the US. Mohammad [00:26:34] Amini, BBC In [00:26:37] conclusion of this news segment, I would also like to say that you can visit our website at any time [00:26:40] of the day or night and follow the latest news from there. [00:26:44] My colleagues are right now live [00:26:47] on our website, updating it moment [00:26:51] by moment, where you can read the latest news [00:26:55] and reactions to the results of the US midterm elections. [00:26:58] Right now, you can also see that Mr. Trump said that the impact of the war on the defeat [00:27:02] of Republicans is largely true. He is referring [00:27:06] to a post by J.D. Vance, his deputy, [00:27:09] who said that the biggest impact [00:27:13] and reason for what happened in this election is the war with Iran, [00:27:17] which has raised the cost of living in the US. [00:27:20] Read more details on our website at [00:27:23] BBCper.com. [00:27:25] This news segment has come to an end. Thank you for being with us, and thank you for choosing [00:27:29] BBC Persian. [00:27:47] The intelligence and security breaches of the Islamic Republic have made it [00:27:51] vulnerable to Israel. What is the reason for this [00:27:54] level of Israeli intelligence penetration into the structure of the Islamic Republic, [00:27:58] and why has Israel not been able [00:28:01] to achieve its desired outcome using [00:28:04] this intelligence and security asset? [00:28:07] There is a difference between your security and intelligence [00:28:10] success in infiltrating and eroding a political [00:28:13] system and your ability to change [00:28:17] political power. There is no power or strength except in God. [00:28:21] Why don't you look at the pictures [00:28:21] you have? [00:28:26] They put me in a governmental shelter, and the children went in one [00:28:30] direction, and I went in another. And I settled. My son, Saeed, who was not yet [00:28:34] two and a half or three years old, came and sat with me. [00:28:38] I told my mom, I want to tell you something. Keep your name, [00:28:41] and your sister's name, and your siblings' names, [00:28:45] and the crime, that is, changing the child's lineage. SOS [00:28:49] International was aware of most of the details, meaning [00:28:52] all the children must be admitted to the children's section. They must have regular [00:28:56] reports sent to the main office in the city, but [00:29:00] I feel like he is acting. Of course, they are acting. [00:29:07] Videos like this are all over social media, [00:29:11] easily produced, high volume, and often very [00:29:14] weird. AI is making it easier to scam us. It [00:29:18] was my voice, it was my phone number. On that day I [00:29:22] hadn't spoken to her. In the age of artificial [00:29:25] intelligence, Panorama asks, is [00:29:28] seeing still believing? [00:30:20] The fall of the strongholds of Republicans in the US midterm [00:30:23] elections. Democrats took [00:30:27] both houses of Congress. [00:30:28] Trump and Vance acknowledge [00:30:34] the impact of the war on the Republican defeat. [00:30:38] The US president, however, still defends his decision to attack [00:30:41] Iran. [00:30:42] Reactions of Iranian officials to [00:30:48] the results of the US midterm elections, from expressing [00:30:52] confidence in the continuation.