BELARUSTV — broadcast
20260811 215500 UTC
510 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] season was indeed successful for the synchronized swimmer, the girl
[00:00:04] made it onto the podium at all the World Cup stages she managed
[00:00:07] to reach, and those the Belarusian mamates won a
[00:00:10] total of six awards, one gold, four silver and one bronze.
[00:02:56] Hello, while we anxiously watch the military actions near our borders,
[00:03:00] there is another process around Iran where the threats,
[00:03:03] perhaps, are no less: artificial intelligence. What will happen to
[00:03:06] us? For now, it is presented as a convenient assistant, but people
[00:03:10] listened to Elon Musk's new interview with The
[00:03:13] Economist, the same one that taught the whole world to decipher
[00:03:16] covers with predictions, they listened and saw the outlines
[00:03:20] of a very strange world that techno-trillionaires are preparing for us. Here
[00:03:23] are just a few points according to Musk. In 5 years, artificial
[00:03:27] intelligence will surpass the combined intelligence of all humanity. Quote: "There
[00:03:30] will be absolutely nothing that it would do worse than a human,
[00:03:34] except, perhaps, the very ability to be human." Musk believes that
[00:03:38] the intelligence gap between AI and humans will become greater than the gap
[00:03:41] between humans and monkeys. During the conversation, the editor-in-chief
[00:03:45] of The Economist directly asked Musk if he still estimates the risk
[00:03:48] of humanity's destruction at 10-20%. Musk
[00:03:52] confirmed this estimate, but added that technological development
[00:03:56] can no longer be stopped, so it's just a quote:
[00:08:42] in one basket, you have no opportunity to go another
[00:08:45] way, right? That is, in this regard, this pushing,
[00:08:49] well, PayPal actually did that, which is why I say that Elon Musk
[00:08:52] is one of the members of the PayPal mafia, they actually
[00:08:56] earned money exactly like that, when other alternative payment systems
[00:09:00] were pushed out due to the fact that they developed
[00:09:04] completely, despite any moral or any
[00:09:08] other restrictions, well, just so everyone understands that you can also
[00:09:11] offer - let's say, unobtrusively not only some
[00:09:14] products or services, but also any idea,
[00:09:17] any behavior pattern, and so on and so forth, one
[00:09:21] thing, the fact is that in essence, artificial intelligence, this
[00:09:25] cinnamon-based approach that was created, it actually
[00:09:28] works very well for working with inanimate nature and is absolutely
[00:09:32] catastrophic when we extrapolate it to the social world,
[00:09:35] to the human world, especially to the world
[00:09:38] of human values, this is the most important thing here.
[00:09:41] Meanwhile, AI - and this is a separate battlefield:
[00:09:44] China is creating a global AI alliance in opposition
[00:09:48] to the USA. Xi Jinping announced the creation of a global organization for
[00:09:51] cooperation in the field of artificial intelligence with headquarters in Shanghai.
[00:09:55] Twenty-nine countries, including Belarus, became co-founders.
[00:09:58] There are no Western states on the list. Thus, Beijing offers
[00:10:02] technology and training to the global South. Washington reacts
[00:10:06] immediately, accusing of stealing AI models, threatening sanctions, and
[00:10:09] so on. Andrey, here's another
[00:10:13] split into at least two poles in the world. Well, you know, these are still very
[00:10:16] unequal poles, because the organization that is under
[00:10:19] China today or with China, it technologically depends entirely
[00:10:23] on China, that is, there are countries that, well...
[00:10:37] well, let's say, to distance them from the West, because the second bloc is the USA and Britain, there is full improvisation, that is, Elon
[00:10:40] Musk, who tells us, this is the same complete
[00:10:43] rejection of state control, so let's develop all this, and then
[00:10:47] we'll see what happens. Well, the third bloc is Western Europe, which has not yet
[00:10:51] made its choice, that is, they still have something, but they are already a little bit
[00:10:55] getting from the Americans and from China, plus they don't have these big data that are in
[00:10:58] American data centers today, so, well, let's say,
[00:11:02] the world has split, but this split in quality,
[00:11:05] in its composition, it is still very unequal, so yes, Belarus is with China today, that is,
[00:11:09] we generally understand that we depend on them for component base,
[00:11:13] yes, for software today, if the Americans cut us off tomorrow, well, with whom will we
[00:11:17] work and how will we develop? But there is also, of course, Russia, they have a certain
[00:11:20] approach, they are also trying, let's say, through energy somewhere
[00:11:23] and...
[00:12:25] here they should train specialists
[00:12:27] capable of creating their own solutions in the most
[00:12:30] promising industries, well, as it is fashionable
[00:12:34] now to talk about artificial
[00:12:38] intelligence, new materials,
[00:12:41] digital industry, quantum technologies. In addition to
[00:12:44] the educational track, the academy should become one of
[00:12:48] the key tools in ensuring technological
[00:12:51] sovereignty.
[00:12:55] this should also be considered as a link in this movement, so as not to lose
[00:12:58] pace again and not get lost when these two giants,
[00:13:02] the United States and China, develop not just
[00:13:05] new technologies, but new worlds, well, the point
[00:13:08] is that, of course, this is already part of the general
[00:13:11] process, and to be in this process,
[00:13:15] you need to have competencies first and foremost,
[00:13:18] and I'll say this, the trend is that you don't just
[00:13:22] need to buy and master something, yes, but also to have
[00:13:25] your own sovereign element
[00:13:28] or product, because to
[00:13:31] be part of something, yes, you need to offer
[00:13:34] something, not just be a consumer, so
[00:13:38] yes, we thought about the fact that since we are going into the future,
[00:13:41] yes, then the specialists
[00:13:45] who will create this future must be forged
[00:13:48] here, right here on their own land, in their own interests,
[00:13:52] in their own tasks that the country faces. Therefore, everything
[00:13:55] is correct, well, now, to conclude this topic, let's throw a bridge to the next conversation
[00:13:59] that awaits us,
[00:14:01] if we look at the two main global conflicts that the whole world is following,
[00:14:05] this is the Ukrainian conflict, the Middle East, then this is all about oil,
[00:14:09] we see that there are problems with the Hormuz Strait, tension in
[00:14:13] the Persian Gulf, Southeast Asia is beginning to experience an oil
[00:14:16] shortage, this is the main producing center, the feeling is that we
[00:14:19] are artificially being pushed towards the end of the raw material era.
[00:14:23] there is one tendency, that
[00:14:55] what the Persian Gulf started
[00:14:58] with in ninety-one, that is, what
[00:15:02] it came to afterwards, that is, this peak, rise,
[00:15:05] yes, today is a launchpad
[00:15:09] for conflicts in Ukraine in Iran, understand,
[00:15:13] how the bar is rising, when I started to analyze, I
[00:15:17] realized that all these situations are not
[00:15:20] accidental, they are interconnected,
[00:15:24] the West... especially the USA has learned to squeeze all the juice out of
[00:15:28] these conflicts, because the margin is growing, this is just
[00:15:32] an example of oil refining, and there are other things there,
[00:15:35] so to say that - this is precisely the digital
[00:15:39] sphere will also become a subject or
[00:15:42] part of all these conflicts, it is quite possible, it's just that the conflicts will be
[00:15:46] different, you understand? well, it's hard to imagine that this will completely replace one another,
[00:15:49] because energy is still needed to power all these fields.
[00:15:53] It seems to me that America is now simply trying to break through
[00:15:57] first into the sixth technological order, this is robotics, but
[00:16:01] for this, resources are needed, the dollar as the main
[00:16:04] resource that allowed America to receive non-equivalent
[00:16:08] exchange and huge profits, it no longer
[00:16:10] works, accordingly, the Trump administration is now
[00:16:14] trying to create, so to speak, a global rent
[00:16:17] in three key areas, this is
[00:16:21] artificial intelligence, that is, they want to impose their electronic
[00:16:24] platforms on practically the maximum number of their
[00:16:27] allies, well, with the exception of China, and as you correctly
[00:16:31] said, to countries under sanctions,
[00:16:34] the second is control of energy. That is,
[00:16:38] the USA has now lost its advantage in producing
[00:16:41] higher quality, cheaper goods, they want to take control
[00:16:45] of the integral part of any industrial
[00:16:48] production, energy. They, well, I have already
[00:16:52] spoken about this, they have already taken control of Nigeria,
[00:16:55] Venezuela, they have entered Iran, ideally,
[00:16:59] the ideal scenario was to take control of Iran by
[00:17:02] killing the leadership of this country, it didn't work out,
[00:17:06] a resounding failure.
[00:18:09] Well, let's talk about Ukraine then, especially about the initiatives that
[00:18:12] the Americans are now putting forward, who are trying to present themselves
[00:18:15] as doves of peace, but what should
[00:18:19] actually be seen in all these processes, let's talk about it: Ukraine,
[00:18:22] is there a chance for peace, and the arrival of the American delegation in Kyiv.
[00:18:26] Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff will visit Ukraine in the second half of August
[00:18:29] as part of events for the thirty-fifth anniversary of independence.
[00:18:32] This is the first visit of US diplomats under Trump. I remind you that
[00:18:36] the trip is already two.
[00:19:07] Democrats, that is, Trump, of course, against the background
[00:19:10] of the Iranian failure, would have been interested in putting
[00:19:13] at least some point, but rather, speaking in commercial terms, selling
[00:19:17] the situation while it can still be sold, because tomorrow it will cease
[00:19:21] to be salable, that is, now we see that after the energy war,
[00:19:24] the infrastructure war that Zelensky unleashed, the price
[00:19:28] of Ukraine for the West is becoming absolutely
[00:19:31] unbearable, infrastructure costs
[00:19:34] are growing, and paying for it will soon be impossible. That is,
[00:19:37] this asset will soon cease to be salable, that
[00:19:40] is, it will soon no longer be possible to sell it, so Trump naturally seeks
[00:19:44] to close the deal, especially against the background of the situation in Iran
[00:19:48] becoming unsolvable, ah,
[00:19:51] there, well, there's a structurally unsolvable conflict, that is, whatever
[00:19:55] is said, Iran cannot retreat, the US cannot win
[00:19:59] without destroying the region, so it will drag on for some time, I think
[00:20:03] at least until the midterm elections in Congress, where then
[00:20:07] it can... transition into some hot phase or something will arise because there is
[00:20:10] a negative scenario up to a ground operation, the fact is that
[00:20:14] yes, the US is losing the most important thing with Iran,
[00:20:17] they are losing oil and the dollar, because the second contour of the dollar,
[00:20:21] the external contour of the dollar, it
[00:20:24] was provided by the fact that the countries of the Persian Gulf, starting with Saudi
[00:20:27] Arabia, sold, denominated oil in dollars, two
[00:20:31] figures tried to sell oil not
[00:20:34] in dollars, this was Saddam Hussein sold in euros, and Muammar
[00:20:38] Gaddafi for gold dinar, we know what happened to them, in this regard,
[00:20:42] today almost half of the oil that comes out of
[00:20:45] the Persian Gulf, Iran takes in yuan,
[00:20:49] the US would have reconciled, perhaps, with
[00:20:52] control of Iran, if it didn't
[00:20:55] hit the petrodollar very hard, and a blow to the
[00:20:59] petrodollar is a blow to the American economy, this is hello
[00:21:02] inflation, this is hello economic laws that until now
[00:21:05] could be ignored, which could be spit on, a list of 30
[00:21:09] trillion in external debt, yes, yes, yes, and all this is starting to work now, because before
[00:21:13] that, the external contour of the dollar allowed the US to export
[00:21:16] inflation to all countries of the world, let's still return to
[00:21:20] Ukraine and listen to Rubia, so what can we expect from them, US Secretary
[00:21:24] of State, please, in the next few weeks, we
[00:21:28] will try to understand if it is possible to resume negotiations between the two sides and end
[00:21:31] this war, but we also understand that both sides have very
[00:21:35] strict red lines, until we manage to at least slightly bring these
[00:21:39] positions closer, no progress will be made. Nevertheless, we are ready
[00:21:42] to act, the President instructed his team, if there is an opportunity
[00:21:46] to give new impetus to peace negotiations, use it.
[00:22:02] Russia demands that the territory
[00:22:05] of Ukraine eliminate the threat
[00:22:09] to the territorial integrity of the country. This has not
[00:22:12] changed. The United States of America are not
[00:22:15] interested in ending the war, they profit from it.
[00:22:19] of the Baltic States, they act in concert, all
[00:25:20] these provocations that were there, both the Latvian
[00:25:23] border, and before that there were Polish drones and everything else, statements that we
[00:25:27] are going to attack someone, in Suwalki, this all goes into the Ukrainian
[00:25:31] mainstream, as a rule, that is, even if the Americans are silent, these people constantly
[00:25:34] open their mouths, so there is a paradox in this, we started with the fact that the world
[00:25:38] is moving at full speed into this new technological
[00:25:40] context, new, yes, where
[00:25:44] everything will be subordinated to this, on the other hand, again, the same
[00:25:47] Latvians, as you said, closing borders.
[00:26:03] banking system, general social discontent, is there anything else we
[00:26:06] should see in this? Well, as I see it, this is also a question of supplying new
[00:26:10] territories, because there are few small and medium-sized businesses, there are no
[00:26:13] stores, retail chains, as here, order pickup points are a way
[00:26:17] to properly receive goods there, if you look at the geography of the strikes, Ukraine
[00:26:21] inflicts them, it's large logistics that works precisely from the south of Russia to the new
[00:26:24] territories, so this is part of the campaign that was about light, about water, that means
[00:26:28] about depriving them of fuel, it's clear that, well, it seems they want to terrorize the new territories
[00:26:32] even further, this is important, secondly, why, for example, do people
[00:26:36] ask, why don't they bomb Ozon? Well, they say that Wildberries
[00:26:39] operates openly in the new territories under its own sign, that is, they are officially
[00:26:43] represented there, all other structures invent different
[00:26:46] schemes for issuing orders, well, by the way, the head, Stillerman - this is the largest Ukrainian
[00:26:50] manufacturer of drones, he states verbatim that we will finish
[00:26:53] Wildberries, and then destroy Ozon, well, you know, they also say
[00:26:57] that Westerners are on the board of directors of Ozon, they probably won't finish it, well,
[00:27:01] briefly I will say that... it seems, again, that is, an attempt to put pressure on
[00:27:05] the authorities through some Russian elites, that is, terrorism as an ideology is also
[00:27:08] a means of intimidation, but we have heard these attempts, including this high-profile
[00:27:12] interview with Andrey Melnichenko, a businessman who put forward four
[00:27:15] scenarios a few weeks ago, remember, actively discussed all this, who and
[00:27:19] how is trying to outline scenarios for the Russian Federation, but nevertheless we see that the process
[00:27:23] is going on, this is in line with what you are saying, yes, but the fact is that if
[00:27:27] you take the strikes on Wildberries, take terrorism, it is actually
[00:27:30] the cherry on top for 40 days.
[00:28:02] because the Russian reaction to strikes on civilian
[00:28:05] infrastructure is a tightening
[00:28:08] of demands on the authorities, but when you achieve this,
[00:28:11] why don't the authorities use more substantial
[00:28:15] weapons, why did they wait so long with sports, why did they wait so long
[00:28:19] with infrastructure, that is,
[00:28:22] pressure of this kind on Russian society exclusively generates
[00:28:25] a reverse reaction, when it will generally be a transition to
[00:28:29] the fact that in reality -
[00:30:02] is too smart for him, but we are talking about this, in this
[00:30:06] case we then understand that on Ukrainian territory not Ukrainian, but
[00:30:10] Russian and American interests clash, and the British are hurt by relations with
[00:30:13] Americans, British with Americans, this
[00:30:17] discourse does not disappear, the British are trying to take control of
[00:30:20] Europe, this discourse also never disappears,
[00:30:24] Americans play their own game, it also does not disappear,
[00:30:28] in the end, Zelensky, who is trying
[00:30:31] to profit from everyone and from all sides, he is also
[00:30:35] a factor in these events. Ukraine is not
[00:30:38] a participant, it is exclusively an object that everyone is carving up. Alexander
[00:30:42] Vladimirovich, what is your view on all this? Well, first of all,
[00:30:45] in this whole situation, I see that Ukraine has long ceased to be a
[00:30:49] state, this country is a mercenary today,
[00:30:53] because it has nothing sovereign, not even
[00:30:57] a budget, it relies on funding, that is, like
[00:31:00] any such commercial structure.
[00:31:46] it turns out here, whoever is first,
[00:31:49] yes, that one is to blame, the next one is simply
[00:31:53] forced, therefore, when we say
[00:31:57] that Russians will be
[00:31:59] enraged about the strike on Gelendzhik,
[00:32:03] there are civilian casualties and so on, then
[00:32:05] here there is a clear
[00:32:09] provocation, Russia has been provoked
[00:32:13] for a very long time to take harsh measures, then? What do we have, Alexander Vladimirovich, we
[00:32:16] have an absence of a vision of that
[00:32:19] horizon on which peace will loom, and it is
[00:32:23] not there, well, nevertheless, all this must come to something,
[00:32:26] conclude, well, we understand perfectly well, and have said a hundred times
[00:32:30] even in this studio, that in order to end the war,
[00:32:33] yes, what needs to be done is to stop financing it
[00:32:37] and providing it with weapons, that's all, but while this process
[00:32:41] is ongoing, all other talk is nonsense, that is, for... never
[00:33:16] will join NATO, said the former
[00:33:19] Commander-in-Chief of the AFU, and now Ambassador of Ukraine to Great Britain, Valery Zaluzhny,
[00:33:23] at a general meeting of ambassadors in Kyiv. Well, the arguments are contradictory
[00:33:26] to begin with, on the one hand, Zaluzhny talks about outdated NATO doctrines
[00:33:30] from World War II, saying that the alliance would need about 12
[00:33:33] years of reforms to even half match the current
[00:33:37] level of Russia's defense potential. On the other hand,
[00:33:39] Zaluzhny stressed that Ukraine urgently needs Western technologies
[00:33:43] that NATO countries have.
[00:34:15] in fact, greatly surpasses both Europe and
[00:34:18] NATO. The first thing, for a Ukrainian to listen to you, you need to
[00:34:21] praise him, say that he surpasses someone. This is the first
[00:34:25] thing, of course, it's a myth. From the point of view of practical
[00:34:28] combat by an individual soldier, this seems
[00:34:32] true, from the point of view that they fight with NATO weapons and
[00:34:35] technologies, satellites - this is all a myth. Well, most of it
[00:34:39] is, no, the fact is that the professionalism that
[00:34:42] has been developed, in fact, it is not there.
[00:35:45] consciousness, if you legally call something differently, then it is a different
[00:35:48] reality, with us it does not work, with us it does not
[00:35:52] work, well, there there is the magic of words, that we
[00:35:55] called it differently, so this is already a different reality, it does not
[00:35:58] work, but again, in Russia it will not work, the fact is
[00:36:02] that yes, in Britain, a classic case, when during
[00:36:05] the Cromwellian revolution, the troops
[00:36:07] of the rebel parliament attacked
[00:36:10] the king with the cry "for the king," this...
[00:36:13] that the political body of the king is in
[00:36:27] parliament, wherever the king may be,
[00:36:31] that is, in this regard, these are purely British tricks
[00:36:34] that, well, absolutely do not apply to us, do not
[00:36:37] work, will not be convincing, and
[00:36:40] I think that no one will believe it, yes, but can
[00:36:44] I offer a version of these geopolitical scenarios, it seems to me that
[00:36:47] Great Britain is trying to take control of part of Northern
[00:36:50] Europe, this is the project that received such
[00:36:53] a beautiful name Northern Hanse,
[00:36:57] and for this they, of course, will need mercenaries, they
[00:37:01] perfectly understand that Europeans cannot fight and do not
[00:37:04] want to, they will be ready to offer this disposable
[00:37:08] function, no longer to Ukraine as a state, but
[00:37:12] to the AFU, as a private
[00:37:15] military company that will perform their
[00:37:19] tasks not only in Europe, but possibly somewhere else in
[00:37:22] the world, they are essentially restoring
[00:37:25] the East India Company.
[00:37:45] we agree that the Ukrainian ambassador to Great Britain spoke in Kyiv on behalf of the British, not Ukrainians,
[00:37:49] of course. The point is that Ukraine as a state no longer
[00:37:51] exists, for this territory the best
[00:37:55] scenario is that of a maid
[00:41:07] began to dress like a mistress, the mistress should begin to dress like
[00:41:10] a maid, these English aristocrats, with the advent
[00:41:13] of the electoral system, they changed clothes like servants, they put
[00:41:17] on these very simple modest costumes, well,
[00:41:21] in general, they decide absolutely everything that will happen,
[00:41:25] at the top the electoral blow. and claims from
[00:41:28] the electorate, discontent absorb
[00:41:31] themselves, those party activists who are
[00:41:34] appointed, who, listen, Vasya, you will now be
[00:41:37] prime minister, you will say something, yes, listen, well,
[00:41:41] we should owe the British a small
[00:41:44] island that has managed to go through all these geopolitical
[00:41:48] intricacies throughout its history, not only
[00:41:51] staying afloat, but also causing trouble where
[00:41:55] it benefits them. And let's take a short break: the migratory
[00:41:58] catastrophe in Spain, who is avenging Madrid and what
[00:42:02] are the consequences for the entire European Union, we'll talk very
[00:42:04] soon.
[00:42:18] Weekdays of Belarusian servicemen, training of recruits,
[00:42:22] exercises, as well as the latest models of military
[00:42:25] equipment. Only that country
[00:42:28] can be truly sovereign, this is especially true now,
[00:42:31] which has a strong, well-armed
[00:42:34] and loyal to the people and the state, army.
[00:42:38] of the Republic of Belarus, watch
[00:43:10] in the Arsenal project on
[00:43:14] Sundays on Belarus 24 channel.
[00:43:29] Migration crisis in Spain, the enclave of Ceuta in North Africa experienced
[00:43:32] an unprecedented influx of migrants, up to 60 thousand people at once
[00:43:36] tried to break through to European territory by land and by swimming.
[00:43:39] It quickly became obvious that the police couldn't cope, so the military had to be
[00:43:42] called in, and this crisis is called artificial and provoked,
[00:43:46] why? Well, Morocco is considered an important ally of the US and Israel in the region
[00:43:50] after the Abraham Accords, theoretically they could have used migration
[00:43:54] as leverage at the request of their senior partners, for example,
[00:43:57] sudden blindness of border guards. Usually Moroccan services
[00:44:01] strictly restrain migrants, however, on July 30, the border actually
[00:44:04] collapsed, a day later Spain and Morocco promptly
[00:44:08] activated the accelerated mode.
[00:44:40] this was demonstrated to be a truly effective
[00:44:43] instrumental move from the point of view of provoking
[00:44:47] a wave, it is clear that one can dig deep
[00:44:51] there, Algeria, something else, with whom Spain
[00:44:55] got involved, whose
[00:44:56] interests
[00:45:00] it did not respect, but the instrumentality
[00:45:03] of this process was colossal, it resembled
[00:45:06] an apocalypse, if you recall twenty-one.
[00:45:10] year, yes, at some point we were accused of instrumentally
[00:45:13] creating something, but again,
[00:45:17] Spain this time demonstrated, we will not
[00:45:21] respect your interests,
[00:45:23] yes, that's why this move happened, from our
[00:45:27] position, for example, it was also clear that when we said:
[00:45:31] guys, you impose sanctions against us, you try to harm us,
[00:45:34] you call us enemies and demand
[00:45:38] that we protect your border, yes, we
[00:45:41] just turned off this function in favor
[00:45:45] of the European Union, they cried, now
[00:45:48] they are howling, you understand, how, that is, based on
[00:45:52] this, I just want to say that Trump is not joking
[00:45:55] when he talks about Europe, that one of the
[00:45:59] stones it cannot lift is this migration
[00:46:02] policy, well, it's fair to say that those
[00:46:06] who see Washington's revenge in this - especially
[00:46:10] after
[00:46:10] Spain, Madrid refused
[00:46:19] to help
[00:46:20] the Pentagon
[00:46:25] attack from their
[00:46:28] strongholds in this case Iranian
[00:46:31] positions, well, of course, this key
[00:46:34] is located somewhere in the in the area of the White
[00:46:38] House. Just for cutting Trump out of the photo
[00:46:42] of the Spanish national team, who
[00:46:45] was photographed during the awards ceremony with them, that
[00:46:48] is, a clear mutual dislike
[00:46:51] is already visible there.
[00:48:22] to express a common position and protect
[00:48:26] common interests, look at Italy, it immediately
[00:48:30] suspended the Schengen agreement, but this is a crisis for all
[00:48:33] institutions of the European Union, because the Schengen
[00:48:36] agreement is a key moment, as we constantly
[00:48:40] talk about, the thing is that the European Union
[00:48:43] is in a permanent crisis, this crisis is constantly
[00:48:47] deepening, Western Europe has abandoned its
[00:48:50] spiritual foundations of Christianity.
[00:49:52] so that right-wing populist parties, which are oriented towards
[00:49:56] Americans, gradually gain ratings, and you don't even need to conquer all of Spain, these
[00:49:59] terrible pictures that are circulating today throughout Western Europe
[00:50:03] as a scarecrow, saying: "Look, migrants will soon conquer us all." In
[00:50:07] general, this is the message of the American media, because Elon Musk also
[00:50:11] posted this, large publications that are connected with Republicans and
[00:50:14] Democrats, that is, they worked on this Europe as they should, so then
[00:50:18] to raise the ratings of right-wing populists, they will constantly throw
[00:50:21] in targeted information.
[00:50:26] well, these kinds of new stories, and of course, let's say that the Spaniards themselves really messed up, because they made a very bad
[00:50:30] decision in April to grant amnesty to half a million migrants who are there, that
[00:50:34] is, they are given a passport and a residence permit for a year, well, that's fine, you can come over, sit
[00:50:38] it out somewhere then get a passport and a residence permit, well,
[00:50:41] the second decision of the Supreme Court, which allowed something about the sea there,
[00:50:44] it means, well, not
[00:50:47] to carry out deportation by a simplified procedure, but only by a court
[00:50:51] decision, that is, 6000... that's it,
[00:51:23] I consider it unequivocally, there are the USA,
[00:51:25] Israel,
[00:51:27] you know, we return to the end of the program, to what
[00:51:31] we started with, and I, honestly, when I was listening
[00:51:34] to Andrey, I was simultaneously thinking about how to formulate
[00:51:38] the final question, because no matter how you approach it,
[00:51:41] it reeks of conspiracy theories, and
[00:51:45] we are serious people, so the last thing I wanted
[00:51:48] was to look like conspiracists, although there was...
[00:51:52] we already discussed it after Trump promised to make all the
[00:51:56] data public, but I still can't help but share such
[00:51:59] feelings that there is a certain imposed scenario both for Western
[00:52:03] countries and for the global South, because it's hard
[00:52:07] to believe that there is some objective historical process that again and again
[00:52:10] pushes us into wars, again and which now
[00:52:14] pushes us into the cold embrace of robots, although the whole world says: no, we are not
[00:52:17] ready, look, it's not objective that there is some
[00:52:21] objective historical process that even in the 21st
[00:52:24] century does not allow us to cope with hunger, and we see in different
[00:52:27] regions of the world, well, such a paradoxical picture, with a bare
[00:52:31] butt, but with a smartphone, these distortions,
[00:53:59] of the United States, which formulate foreign policy, and
[00:54:03] investment banking capital. and new capital that
[00:54:06] arose around IT, and there the goals are quite honestly
[00:54:10] declared, which, well, any person
[00:54:13] would say that this is delusional conspiracy, that this
[00:54:17] can never be, but well, it is said, it
[00:54:20] is declared, and it happens, this is the logic
[00:54:24] of money movement, and as soon as we look at the fact that at
[00:54:27] all times, in all eras, there were people who, having
[00:54:31] concentrated a certain amount of money, began to serve it. does
[00:55:43] every person have the same starting
[00:55:46] right to be equal, or
[00:55:50] are there civilized peoples and barbarians,
[00:55:53] there is a hierarchy and coercion, these two
[00:55:57] concepts are at war with each other, and today we
[00:56:00] see them entering another clinch, someone
[00:56:03] is trying to preserve...
[00:57:05] behind them, they have huge capital influence, or has it turned into something
[00:57:08] incomprehensible to us, some funds, capital, where families
[00:57:12] hold property that has been passed down for many, many centuries and
[00:57:15] is growing, and today... corporations like BlackRock, for example,
[00:57:19] have more influence than, say, the entire
[00:57:22] American government, perhaps, or individual Western
[00:57:26] European countries, in this regard, we need to see a more realistic picture,
[00:57:30] that the election of some president or party, they guarantee you nothing,
[00:57:33] when they try to impose some choice on us there in terms of personality, surnames there
[00:57:37] alternative to our president, this is not the choice of another
[00:57:40] person, this is a transition under the control of another center that will make
[00:57:43] decisions for us. Arisham Vladimirovich,
[00:57:47] I fully agree, the fact that today funds,
[00:57:51] like BlackRock, Morgans, and so on, they decide more
[00:57:54] today than all the others, they show us a picture
[00:57:58] that has already become ingrained, like democracy,
[00:58:01] some elections, some other moments, but in reality
[00:58:04] everything, today lies in the
[00:58:08] competence of such companies as BlackRock, and I will say this,
[00:58:11] that, for example, the possibilities, probably,
[00:58:15] of the hegemon have run out, why? Because its
[00:58:18] national debt is already at its limit, that
[00:58:21] is, the point of no return, we sometimes
[00:58:24] say that there are petrodollars, I generally
[00:58:27] get the impression that it's about
[00:58:31] devaluing this dollar, and BlackRock could for pennies, such
[00:58:35] as BlackRock could for pennies buy up everything that
[00:58:38] is left in this America, and further, further
[00:58:42] everyone lives on rent, the whole world,
[00:58:46] Americans there... Europeans, that is, everything
[00:58:49] lives on rent, renting from BlackRock itself,
[00:58:52] housing, there, resources, energy
[00:58:55] there everything, that is, it turns out, there is some kind of redistribution,
[00:58:59] the world that is hiding behind
[00:59:02] the picture, that's what they show us today, because
[00:59:06] well, I don't know, if it goes on like this,
[00:59:10] here's a simple question,
[00:59:12] today global things are happening not because
[00:59:15] of what they say and print.
[00:59:47] Thank you very much for participating in this conversation, that's all for today, see you in a week, goodbye.