BELARUSTV — broadcast
20261004 170000 UTC
516 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] we are not going to, as the president said, we will not be left
[00:00:03] behind, and he said one more time that this will be
[00:00:07] a completely different war, it will be short. We have said many
[00:00:10] times that this scenario is very
[00:00:13] realistic, leading to a conflict, unfortunately, what we
[00:00:17] have been observing lately, hearing and seeing from Western countries, unfortunately
[00:00:20] only confirms this scenario, but on the other
[00:00:23] hand, well, yes, they bought weapons, they produced them, well, yes, they invested
[00:00:27] in the military, but dying is more expensive?
[00:00:32] Is there a chance at all to turn these Western elites
[00:00:36] away from stubbornly leading to war, from provoking
[00:00:40] Russia?
[00:00:45] Well, first of all, at present, despite the fact that there is a war in Ukraine,
[00:00:48] and in general, 2025 from
[00:00:52] the point of view of the United Nations became a record year for the number
[00:00:56] of armed conflicts and their geography, there is still room.
[00:01:01] to take a few steps back from the abyss called World War
[00:01:04] III, we once talked about this after the meeting
[00:01:08] between Putin and Trump in Anije, then unfortunately events followed
[00:01:12] that indicate that
[00:01:15] agreements, preliminary ones, concluded between Russia
[00:01:18] and the US were not fulfilled and are unlikely to be, moreover,
[00:01:22] everyone frankly started laughing at the phrase “the spirit
[00:01:25] of Ankardige,”
[00:01:28] a diplomatic path remains.
[00:01:30] However, at the same time, we must objectively analyze a number
[00:01:33] of very alarming signs indicating that preparations for
[00:01:37] an aggressive war are underway, and you are right that the war
[00:01:41] will cost millions of human lives. Is the West ready for
[00:01:45] war - this is a rhetorical question, or rather Western society, but in my
[00:01:48] opinion, the peoples of Central
[00:01:52] for war. Uh-huh. For example, data on
[00:01:55] arms export-import in
[00:01:58] 2025 indicate this. The global arms export market
[00:02:02] was estimated at 120 billion dollars, of which
[00:02:06] 80 billion accounts for NATO countries. The leading
[00:02:09] manufacturer is the United States of America, third place is
[00:02:12] Germany, and so on. And who buys
[00:02:15] weapons? First place in the world is the Republic
[00:02:19] of Poland. Approximately 13% of all arms
[00:02:22] deals are arms imports. Second place
[00:02:25] is Romania. What does this indicate?
[00:02:28] Should we consider these objective factors when we conduct,
[00:02:32] for example, diplomatic negotiations with the Republic of Poland,
[00:02:35] Sikorski tells us about the diplomacy of snowdrops, well, you should never
[00:02:39] refuse to talk, but let's recall the situation on the eve of World
[00:02:42] War II: practically everyone concluded non-aggression pacts with
[00:02:46] Germany, and the first to do so was the Republic of Poland. And how did
[00:02:50] World War II begin? With Hitler's provocation that
[00:02:53] supposedly Poles attacked the Third Reich. It's interesting that you draw this
[00:02:57] parallel, because from the NATO camp,
[00:03:00] such, you know, suspicious things are heard, on the one hand, they are pumping up
[00:03:04] Lithuania, Poland, well, it's dangerous to pump
[00:03:07] up Lithuania, because the state is small, but in a military sense it simply may not
[00:03:10] withstand such tension, well, I'll put it this way, excuse me, I might be taking
[00:03:14] up my colleagues' time, as much as possible,
[00:03:18] Lithuania has already been pumped up, so look, at the same time, the NATO Secretary General makes
[00:03:21] a statement, you even need to try to comprehend what he is saying, because it's
[00:03:25] a stand-up comedian in fact, Article Five
[00:03:28] of the Charter, he says,
[00:04:00] a Russian crosses the border, NATO fighters will
[00:04:03] immediately scramble, F-35s will sweep everything away, but in fact
[00:04:07] we know that these promises are very
[00:04:10] often not kept, especially if the cost
[00:04:14] is damage or death of German and
[00:04:17] French citizens, then their lives, their value, compared
[00:04:21] to Poles, Lithuanians, is much higher valued in
[00:04:25] Western Europe, and here the question is
[00:04:28] different, why do the elites
[00:04:30] of these states go, well, they understand everything perfectly,
[00:04:33] this hierarchy, and that
[00:04:36] they are doomed, in case of a clash with Russia
[00:04:40] and Belarus, why do they do it? There are two,
[00:04:43] two points: first, they are either
[00:04:46] simply outright foreign agents,
[00:04:49] well, simply graduates or protégés of special services
[00:04:52] or special institutions, they manage not in the interests of their
[00:04:56] peoples, or they trade in the security of their countries.
[00:05:00] Today they will attract contracts, funding,
[00:05:03] troops, they will make good money, then they will leave and smoke
[00:05:06] something far away, and they
[00:05:09] no longer care what happens to these states, that is...
[00:05:12] In fact, the question is
[00:05:15] about with whom, what to
[00:05:18] talk about, knowing the real background and the real
[00:05:22] consciousness of these people, moreover, pay attention, the same Rieter is much more
[00:05:25] specific when talking about Ukraine, here he has no vague
[00:05:28] wording, I quote verbatim: NATO countries are ready to deploy
[00:05:32] troops on the territory of Ukraine in case of conflict resolution with
[00:05:35] Russia, but as if forgetting that one of the main
[00:05:39] reasons for the special military operation is this direct.
[00:07:14] here you have to understand, we shouldn't proceed from Patriot missiles, the thing is
[00:07:17] that this topic generally depends on
[00:07:21] profitability, and we all should have understood a long time ago that
[00:07:24] war is business, whether it's soft, hard, cold,
[00:07:28] hot, it's all business, and
[00:07:31] profitability is at the heart of this business, as long as the
[00:07:34] national debt and
[00:07:38] financing of these military preparations are at the same
[00:07:42] level. As soon as the national debt starts
[00:07:45] to exceed or military preparations, yes, then
[00:07:48] appropriate movements will begin. From all this, I see one
[00:07:52] big problem: we don't notice how investment
[00:07:55] funds, transnational corporations are quickly
[00:07:59] adapting to the topic of multipolarity.
[00:08:02] Today we perceive it as a change,
[00:08:05] yes, the hegemony of a unipolar world to a multipolar one, and
[00:08:09] these investment funds and corporations, they...
[00:08:13] are viewed as business fragmentation, you see,
[00:08:16] how they are just as actively integrating into
[00:08:20] the global South, this global majority,
[00:08:23] in this case, they already consider the state as
[00:08:27] a tool to achieve their goals, because in fact, investment funds have invested
[00:08:31] in the whole world, they are
[00:08:33] co-owners of shares
[00:08:37] around the world, that is, everything today
[00:08:40] belongs to them, and if...
[00:08:42] if you look closer, they have a big safety
[00:08:46] cushion, these are pension funds, 15
[00:08:49] trillion, right, or how much more,
[00:08:53] probably, is at their disposal, you see,
[00:08:57] that is, they have the means
[00:09:00] today to achieve this,
[00:09:04] this is such an element, whose task is to
[00:09:07] annoy, well, look, Moscow says, we perceive
[00:09:10] any objects from which a threat
[00:09:14] may emanate, as potential targets for strikes, in
[00:09:18] case this last red line is
[00:09:21] crossed, the Poles suddenly say: we will build
[00:09:24] Patriots, and moreover, we believe that this will be a safe
[00:09:27] territory somewhere in Poland, that is, well,
[00:09:30] this feeling, you know, like children, I'm in my house, I
[00:09:34] hear nothing, see nothing, this is my position, no, this is
[00:09:37] a tactic, a new tactic, you see, yesterday,
[00:09:40] I think, attacked...
[00:10:12] there are no safe distances, it can be considered a provocation in that
[00:10:16] case, of course, that is, it is a conscious
[00:10:18] provocation, it is a challenge, as we said,
[00:10:22] to that very Article Five, Alekseevich. How do you
[00:10:25] see this? You know, we have discussed many times that at the core
[00:10:29] of all conflicts lies economics, and
[00:10:32] we know perfectly well that since 2008,
[00:10:35] Europe, as
[00:10:37] in principle, the global corporate economy, cannot
[00:10:40] cope with the main crisis of overproduction, the crisis
[00:10:43] of overproduction, which has accompanied
[00:10:46] these large corporations many times, there are many goods, no one
[00:10:50] to sell them to, the best means of getting rid
[00:10:54] of all...
[00:11:55] in theory, it's economic theory, but in practice it doesn't work,
[00:11:59] especially when giants like
[00:12:02] China, Russia, India, started uniting,
[00:12:05] closing their markets in BRICS, SCO, and saying:
[00:12:08] "That's it, friends, forget about it, we don't need your European, American
[00:12:12] goods at all, the basis of any nation's wealth is
[00:12:16] formed by goods, they say: how can that be, we
[00:12:19] were these dominants, yes, we were
[00:12:22] the metropolis, you were colonies, everything was wonderful for us, now..." you
[00:12:25] say that our goods are not needed by you, we
[00:12:28] will then engage in another way of earning money
[00:12:31] through war, but war, as is known, Lenin once
[00:12:35] repeated this phrase, Lenin said, the best
[00:12:38] means of embezzlement is war, because in this way you
[00:12:42] gain access to budgets, who forms the budget,
[00:12:45] ordinary citizens with their taxes, naturally, having gained
[00:12:48] access, corporations, the corporate elite gains access through war to
[00:12:52] these budget funds.
[00:13:55] lies in the sub-crane, and at the right moment they will stop it. Poles are different, since
[00:13:59] we are talking about neighbors, and sensible people in Poland also, of course,
[00:14:02] exist, we cannot allow ourselves to be drawn into
[00:14:05] war, under this heading a local magazine publishes an interview with retired
[00:14:09] General Leon Komornicki, former deputy chief of staff of the Polish
[00:14:13] army. I see no goals from Russia's point of view
[00:14:17] that it could achieve by starting a war with Poland. Therefore, I
[00:14:20] believe that the entire rhetorical campaign unfolding on
[00:14:24] this issue is subordinate not to Russian, but to our internal
[00:14:27] political goals. Politicians and generals talk about war
[00:14:30] instead of peace, they talk about war to justify spending
[00:14:34] huge sums of money. We see that inside, Poland sees what
[00:14:38] we are talking about, exactly the same way now. The method
[00:14:41] of historical analogies is, of course, controversial, but at the same
[00:14:44] time, the main threat to Poland today is
[00:14:48] being drawn into the space of World War
[00:14:51] III, when Poland will become simply a puppet in the hands of the West.
[00:15:04] at the level of rhetoric, at the level of practical actions, they are preparing for war with Russia, which was the case in the
[00:15:07] 1930s, until February 1939,
[00:15:11] the Polish General Staff developed plans for attacking the
[00:15:14] USSR, while the real threat to Poland
[00:15:17] came from Germany, but the Polish
[00:15:20] military-political leadership, President Rydz-Śmigły, and before him the Minister
[00:15:24] of Foreign...
[00:15:49] for 2027-2034, this process is accompanied by numerous disputes within the
[00:15:52] European Union, the group of six states,
[00:15:56] Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland,
[00:15:59] Sweden and Denmark, refuse to approve this
[00:16:03] budget if it retains a high proportion of social spending.
[00:16:07] for aid, to the countries of southern and
[00:16:11] central Europe, farmers,
[00:16:15] enterprises, businesses suffering losses,
[00:16:18] but instead these funds
[00:16:21] are proposed to be redirected to so-called defense
[00:16:24] needs, this is another proof that it is this
[00:16:28] region, Central European, which
[00:16:30] in principle, according to the plan of these financial whales, which Alexey
[00:16:34] Alekseevich spoke about, should become the arena of the future against.
[00:17:07] confrontation of different approaches, to say that
[00:17:11] there are no sane forces left in Europe, I would not
[00:17:14] say, the same Alternative for Germany, the party is quite
[00:17:17] loose, controversial from the point of view
[00:17:20] of ideology, some, let's say, some
[00:17:24] bias, there is also an openly ultra-right wing, but at the same time
[00:17:27] from there come sensible voices about the need
[00:17:30] to still negotiate, although it is difficult to imagine anyone more radical in
[00:17:34] their policies than the same Merz now, judging by what he says.
[00:18:37] Iran said, I know a thousand ways to lure
[00:18:41] the Russian bear out of its den, but I don't know
[00:18:44] a single way to drive it
[00:18:47] back. Let's continue this topic, is there
[00:18:50] a chance at all for these alternatives, Alternative for
[00:18:53] Germany, Polish forces in France, so that
[00:18:57] they create that critical mass that will be able to reset these
[00:19:01] elites, and war, despite all the practical
[00:19:04] benefits, will not become, let's say, the main one.
[00:20:07] who will say: well, let's go back, for example, to building a common European
[00:20:11] home, and what will start again, internal
[00:20:14] changes and turmoil will begin with us, that is, we will have to enter into some
[00:20:18] convergence with these forces, well, in order to restore
[00:20:22] relations and talk about security, but we have also
[00:20:25] been through this, we remember the lessons of convergence, perestroika,
[00:20:29] building a common European home, that is, the question is
[00:20:32] what, this is a multi-level game,
[00:20:35] how much these forces will retain their
[00:20:39] political credo, how much we will be able
[00:20:42] to retain our credo in relations with them, because it is very easy to say,
[00:20:46] yes, that's enough of this East, we are tired, let's hug and love again.
[00:21:20] radically changed, that is, changing Europe, cooperation with them
[00:21:24] for refusing relations with China or
[00:21:27] the East would be extremely imprudent, so
[00:21:31] yes, let these forces come, prove that they are truly
[00:21:34] friendly, but we should not fall into euphoria, let alone
[00:21:37] abandon partners who have appeared recently,
[00:21:41] if we summarize the main
[00:21:44] question,
[00:21:46] in that case, to conclude the first part of our conversation,
[00:21:50] who ultimately benefits more from the war in Ukraine? Alexey
[00:21:53] Alekseevich, since you discussed the topic of benefit in your opening statement,
[00:21:56] Americans or Europeans?
[00:22:00] You know, the Americans clearly answered this question back in September
[00:22:04] 2022 in a publication in
[00:22:07] Rand, they answered that the war in
[00:22:10] Ukraine is necessary for
[00:22:13] Anglo-Saxon corporations, the very goal of this war
[00:22:17] is not Russia, not even China, it is
[00:22:21] Europe, thus there is a destruction
[00:22:24] of European competitive corporations, banks,
[00:22:28] the attraction of all engineering elites,
[00:22:31] corporate designers directly to
[00:22:35] America and the formation of powerful
[00:22:38] industrial and technological clusters based on
[00:22:41] European corporations, that is the goal,
[00:22:44] that's why they are waging this war, definitely the Americans,
[00:22:48] but they are waging it against Europe. more and more often recently,
[00:22:52] I'm sure our viewers also encounter thoughts, and a number of Russian
[00:22:55] experts, for example, Alexander Dugin, says that in principle
[00:22:59] World War III is already underway, but it's not a war, conditionally speaking, between Russia
[00:23:02] and the West, and certainly not Russia and Ukraine, it's a war
[00:23:06] of a unipolar world with a multipolar world, that is,
[00:23:09] that's it, but considering that there was talk about that, and Alexan Vladimich's idea was
[00:23:13] interesting, that these global corporations have restructured in such a way that they
[00:23:17] have learned to work with the global South, including,
[00:23:45] they know how to extract net profit in interaction with China, with
[00:23:48] SCO, with BRICS. Well, they will establish
[00:23:51] relations, they will train politicians who will say
[00:23:55] what is needed, they will train analysts who will
[00:23:59] produce what is needed, the main thing is to extract net profit, and
[00:24:02] we perfectly another stage of extracting
[00:24:05] net profit is market control, raw material
[00:24:08] markets and, most importantly, sales markets, because
[00:24:12] our planet Earth is already limited in terms of sales
[00:24:15] markets, and pay attention to what the leading
[00:24:19] owners strive for?
[00:25:20] Well, Zelensky is already a pathological hanger,
[00:25:23] for him, any topic
[00:25:27] that leads to peace causes not just irritation, but
[00:25:30] fear, and
[00:25:33] animal fear, he says,
[00:25:36] of course, Trump about Moscow, understanding that Zelensky
[00:25:39] will never agree, but nevertheless,
[00:25:42] at the APEC summit,
[00:25:45] these moments are already being discussed, that is,
[00:25:49] still. Trump promotes the ideas
[00:25:52] of diplomatic
[00:25:55] negotiations that could resolve, sign, and so
[00:25:58] on. Trump also needs to hurry, because his system.
[00:28:32] with the use of artificial intelligence, Palantir, all this
[00:28:36] is now widely known, regarding the destruction of Russian fuel
[00:28:39] infrastructure and popular
[00:28:42] marketplaces warehouses, it has in principle changed Russia's
[00:28:46] approach to waging war, so now they are talking
[00:28:49] about an energy truce about the possibility of some
[00:28:52] consultations, but I suspect that Moscow will
[00:28:56] not agree to this, Moscow has quite
[00:28:59] specific parameters.
[00:30:03] thinks thoroughly about life after the war, we
[00:30:06] try, I quote him, we try to do our work in such a way
[00:30:09] that after the war and after this presidential work you can continue to live in
[00:30:13] your country, walk the streets and no one will want to kill
[00:30:16] you and hate you, he is talking about himself, of course,
[00:30:20] well, he reveals his fear, he is most afraid
[00:30:23] of this, he understands that after
[00:30:26] the war even those fanatics who are now
[00:30:30] , relatively speaking, protecting his power, will come to him and
[00:30:33] ask: why did you bring it to this point, because
[00:30:37] well, the strategic outcome
[00:30:40] of this war for Ukraine is clear, it is a disaster,
[00:30:44] demographic, economic, territorial,
[00:30:48] then these frustrated people,
[00:30:50] only offended, who did not get either victory, nor
[00:30:54] any satisfaction from the fact that they fought, and to whom
[00:30:57] will they present these claims, they are field commanders,
[00:31:01] veterans?
[00:31:45] Bandera left, and none of them were
[00:31:48] saved from a very sad physical end, and here Alexey Valerievich
[00:31:51] is absolutely right,
[00:31:55] bills for these accounts will be presented by people
[00:31:58] who lost their property, loved ones, relatives, health
[00:32:01] in this war, and of course peace will not suit the revanchists, that
[00:32:05] is, in essence, the most important question that should
[00:32:08] also be started to be discussed and
[00:32:12] specific planning developed in this regard. What will happen
[00:32:15] after? Any war, as we know, ends with some
[00:32:19] solution, what will the territory of Ukraine turn into, what processes will
[00:32:23] take place there, including from the point of view of our country's national
[00:32:26] security, four nuclear
[00:32:29] power plants are currently under the control of the Kyiv regime,
[00:32:32] chaos, destabilization, collapse of Ukrainian
[00:32:35] statehood - this is a threat to national security, perhaps
[00:32:39] even more serious than what is happening today
[00:32:42] in this territory. Our security is also
[00:32:46] directly affected, regarding walking calmly on the
[00:32:50] streets when it all ends, here it seems Vladimir Zelensky rushed things,
[00:32:53] indeed, according to a sociological survey,
[00:32:56] 50% of surveyed Ukrainians are most concerned not
[00:33:00] about war, but about corruption, and
[00:33:02] 72% believe that Zelensky
[00:33:06] personally is to blame for it, so
[00:33:08] most likely he will have to leave anyway, Vladimir, well, I
[00:33:11] agree that he has nowhere to go.
[00:33:15] He will simply be caught
[00:33:18] at any stage and torn to pieces, why? Because
[00:33:22] yes, indeed, well,
[00:33:25] you have to understand, Zelensky is certainly to blame, but
[00:33:28] he is not the main driving force in this whole
[00:33:31] tragedy, the point is that this country was led
[00:33:34] to this finish line
[00:33:38] a long, long time ago, they will simply blame
[00:33:41] everything on him, yes, they say that he was able to steal
[00:33:45] more than anyone else, because such a budget as he was given was not given
[00:33:48] to anyone, so, the more
[00:33:51] handouts, the more you can steal from these
[00:33:54] elements, but Zelensky clings
[00:33:58] to this war, because he has no other options, he
[00:34:02] understands perfectly that the longer the war goes on, the longer
[00:34:05] he has something to bite us with, look, Sibiga
[00:34:09] is speaking, he starts talking about his old record again, Ukraine
[00:34:12] calls to strengthen pressure on the regime. Lukashenko for complicity in Russian
[00:34:16] aggression, they want to add new ingredients to the cauldron of war,
[00:34:20] you understand what the question is, not an attempt to build some, and even
[00:34:23] to realize what it would be like if Belarus was really
[00:34:26] an aggressor, so for us it would be monstrous, but for
[00:34:30] them, well, he is calling on NATO,
[00:34:33] you understand, he wants to draw not Belarus into the war,
[00:34:37] he wants to draw NATO into the war, so he is looking for pretexts and
[00:34:40] reasons through the Belarusian circuit, so in this
[00:34:43] regard, I say. The longer the war goes on, the longer
[00:34:47] his chances of living, well,
[00:34:49] you know, when they talk about corruption in Ukraine,
[00:34:53] we can already clearly see that this corruption
[00:34:56] is coming as an ideology from NATO structures, from
[00:35:00] European Union structures,
[00:35:03] yes, that there are some NABU fighting
[00:35:06] supposedly against corruption, so these are corrupt officials fighting
[00:35:09] corrupt officials, they are simply trying to control
[00:35:12] access to different funds and...
[00:35:45] as in America, as in Europe, they earn well,
[00:35:48] they will not give up Zelensky under any circumstances, because
[00:35:52] in colloquial slang, criminal slang - he is
[00:35:55] a runner, yes, because a runner must always
[00:35:58] work, run around, solve problems, take
[00:36:02] on the main risks, key people who
[00:36:05] stole, received the main funds, no one will
[00:36:08] see them, yes, at some stage they will shoot this Zelensky
[00:36:12] or they won't shoot him.
[00:37:54] Eurasia, the largest continent on the planet with almost
[00:37:58] a hundred states, there is currently a military conflict on the territory of Eurasia, largely
[00:38:01] provoked by a state located on another
[00:38:05] continent, but instead of us deciding what to do on our own continent,
[00:38:08] we are waiting for what some external forces will say about this,
[00:38:12] starting with representatives of the country that, in fact,
[00:38:16] provoked this military conflict. The nominal
[00:38:19] current security architecture, represented primarily by
[00:38:23] the UN and its Security Council, well, everyone understands
[00:38:26] perfectly well that it not only does not work,
[00:38:29] but has also collapsed with a deafening crash. The longer
[00:38:32] there is no adequate counterbalance in the world, with adequate
[00:38:35] unity, the more often new military conflicts and new economic
[00:38:39] confrontations will occur on the planet, despite all the
[00:38:42] risks, challenges, and threats in Belarus, what is most important, there was no,
[00:38:46] there is no, and no war is expected, and the Belarusian army is not involved in
[00:38:50] direct armed conflict, so that there would be no war in Belarus, it was impossible to crash
[00:38:54] the country's economy with excessive, and as it later turned out...
[00:40:37] War, war, war, but perhaps humanity can do otherwise, not just
[00:40:41] use the right of the strong, but live humanly. Belarus puts forward
[00:40:44] the initiative of the Eurasian Charter of Diversity and Multipolarity in
[00:40:48] the XX century, launched the negotiation process symbolically on the sidelines of
[00:40:52] the UN General Assembly. The idea of the charter arose in
[00:40:55] 2023, what will it be about? The Union of
[00:41:40] Myanmar, that is, for us it is important that friendly states share our
[00:41:44] view on the future multipolar world order, and here there is
[00:41:48] no, probably, any concentrated
[00:41:50] project, we propose to discuss how the multipolar
[00:41:54] world will look, and before that in our discussion the
[00:41:57] topic of the reasoning of Alexander Gelyevich Dugin was touched upon
[00:42:01] that the current confrontation is a confrontation between
[00:42:04] a unipolar and multipolar world, but there are
[00:42:08] certain vulnerabilities in this reasoning. The fact is that even
[00:42:11] supporters of a multipolar world are
[00:42:15] not united in their views, because
[00:42:18] we know that Dugin's illusions, for example,
[00:42:21] regarding the possibility of a pact with
[00:42:24] right-wing, conservative American circles, with
[00:42:27] Trumpists, they generally crumbled, and Trump's
[00:42:30] realpolitik, that is, we look at the multipolar world
[00:42:33] differently, so in this regard, multipolarity
[00:42:37] instead of unipolarity will not necessarily be a blessing.
[00:44:10] that we are proposing this new concept
[00:44:13] without destroying the old, that is, even
[00:44:17] with all the objective criticism of the United Nations, we say that
[00:44:21] we need to breathe new life into it, that is, not abolish
[00:44:24] the SCO, BRICS, some other institutions to rethink,
[00:44:28] and why is this important?
[00:44:30] well, it is really important to go the evolutionary
[00:44:34] way here and, figuratively speaking, to grow
[00:44:37] more or less working structures, well... predatory
[00:45:41] such a struggle for survival on the part of
[00:46:02] the outgoing hegemon, he just clings with all his
[00:46:06] claws, teeth to this status of his, he doesn't want...
[00:48:52] the main struggle, pay attention, who was sitting at
[00:48:56] a reception in Washington at the same table with Trump and Xi, these are
[00:48:59] technobillionaires, Musk, Cook, Huang,
[00:49:02] SpaceX, Apple and Nvidia. And we see that
[00:49:05] there are different approaches. Bill Gates, for example, says: it is absolutely
[00:49:09] necessary to introduce state regulation, to develop
[00:49:12] common norms in the world, China, USA, how will we
[00:49:16] regulate, and without regulation it is impossible. There is
[00:49:19] Trump, who publicly declares that... no, we will not
[00:49:23] regulate, because otherwise we will lose the race, and this
[00:49:26] is like death, he even wrote on his social networks, whoever wins in
[00:49:29] the field of AI, that
[00:52:05] we see perfectly well from Ukraine, when
[00:52:09] these CIA chief comes to
[00:52:12] President Vladimir Vladimirovich
[00:52:16] Putin and says: we have artificial intelligence,
[00:52:19] calculated that your economy will soon be bad, yes
[00:52:23] surrender, go for a truce,
[00:52:26] but what did they answer him, well, you sort of go with your artificial
[00:52:30] intelligence, go on, they also predicted
[00:52:33] some strikes on... and thought that strikes on
[00:52:36] oil would cause a political crisis before
[00:52:40] the elections, that is, they think so stereotypically that their artificial
[00:52:44] intelligence has really enslaved them and they are really
[00:52:47] these, what are they called, not caterpillars, but snails, so
[00:52:51] they are snails, Americans and Europeans are snails who trust
[00:52:54] artificial intelligence, we do not just not trust artificial intelligence, we use
[00:53:25] the artificial word super
[00:53:28] intelligence, why? because the taxi is symbolically
[00:53:31] symbolically shortened to AI, it turns out, yes.
[00:55:08] now a new panic wave is emerging, they
[00:55:11] again medical and
[00:55:14] retail workers put on masks,
[00:55:17] you see, that is, they caught some disease that
[00:55:21] is already difficult to treat and spreads
[00:57:52] Riga is preparing another round of prohibitions against Minsk and
[00:57:55] Moscow. We want the three Baltic countries to have a completely unified position
[00:57:58] on the issue of Russian and Belarusian grain. According to experts, this is capable of
[00:58:02] disrupting traditional logistics chains,
[00:58:05] reducing supply in the market and pushing up
[00:58:09] world grain prices. Lithuania has taken concrete
[00:58:12] steps to revise its nuclear-free
[00:58:16] status. The relevant committee of the Seimas supported
[00:58:19] the initiative to exclude from the Constitution
[00:58:22] the article prohibiting the deployment of
[00:58:25] nuclear weapons and foreign military bases
[00:58:28] on the country's territory. Alternative for
[00:58:32] Germany celebrates victory, while Chancellor Merz shows
[00:58:35] confusion. The era of the black-red cabinet
[00:58:39] is over, the activity of the federal government is not just helpless,
[00:58:43] it is immoral. Especially the unprecedented borrowing
[00:58:46] policy. Finances are in a deplorable
[00:58:49] state, Merz leaves behind scorched earth,
[00:58:53] you are pushing Germany towards state bankruptcy, which
[00:58:56] can happen at any moment. According to the French Court of Auditors, by
[00:59:00] 2026 the country's national debt
[00:59:03] will for the first time exceed the mark of 3.6
[00:59:07] trillion euros, which will amount
[00:59:09] to 118.5% of
[00:59:12] GDP. The country has faced a series of weak governments,
[00:59:16] incapable.
[01:00:23] Hello, this is the main broadcast, we summarize the results of the week, watching how Western
[01:00:27] officials and NATO military strategists have finally moved from hidden
[01:00:31] plans to cynical discussions of the timing of a direct military
[01:00:34] confrontation. Minsk is already habitually responding to these challenges with
[01:00:38] cold pragmatism, building the foundation for a peaceful
[01:00:41] tomorrow. This week, the president conducted a large-scale personnel audit, sending
[01:00:45] a clear signal to managers: " State security does not begin in
[01:00:49] offices, but on