BELARUSTV — broadcast
20261012 123000 UTC
509 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:04] restoration of two significant objects for the complex: the Prushinsky Chapel and the ancient Mill. Only ruins of these structures
[00:00:08] have survived to this day. The plans are to restore the former appearance
[00:00:11] of the historical buildings. The construction team aims to maximally preserve
[00:00:15] and strengthen the authentic brick masonry, as well as to expose and
[00:00:19] strengthen
[00:00:19] the foundation.
[00:00:30] work on the construction of the pile field is being carried out,
[00:00:33] reinforcing the foundation slab of the building for subsequent pouring
[00:00:37] of approximately 100 m3 of concrete. Work has been completed on the chapel
[00:00:41] to reinforce the foundations, install a concrete
[00:00:44] floor slab, and recreate
[00:00:47] the brickwork of the walls. All work is being carried out in accordance with
[00:00:50] approved schedules without disruptions. After
[00:00:54] the completion of the work, the renovated buildings will continue their activities. The
[00:00:57] ancient chapel will house thematic exhibitions, and
[00:01:01] the four-story mill will practically regain its functional
[00:01:04] purpose.
[00:01:06] A solo exhibition by Dmitry Surinovich opened at the National Art Museum.
[00:01:10] The artist has seen a special world of colors since he was 15
[00:01:14] years old, when he started drawing with his father's commander's pencils. His
[00:01:18] watercolor works are a peculiar high
[00:01:20] poetry. An important theme of Suranovich's work is representatives
[00:01:24] of the fair sex. In the year of Belarusian women, this is especially relevant.
[00:01:28] Most of the works in the exhibition are presented to the Minsk viewer for the first time. The
[00:01:31] exhibition hall features more than 80 watercolor works, including etudes,
[00:01:35] realistic landscapes, sketches, and drawings from hiking
[00:01:38] trips. In my opinion, creativity
[00:01:41] changed with age, because
[00:01:45] yes, his watercolors became more mature, more
[00:01:48] saturated in color scheme, as if
[00:01:52] various themes were added, various series, the artist
[00:01:56] traveled more, the artist is versatile, he can do abstract things.
[00:05:41] The center has two main tasks, one of which is directly
[00:05:44] related to the implementation
[00:05:46] of personal data protection legislation, protecting our
[00:05:50] personal data, and the other is related to organizing
[00:05:54] training on these issues. The direction of
[00:05:57] ensuring information security is highlighted as
[00:06:00] such a narrative, an imperative
[00:06:03] when organizing public security in our country.
[00:06:07] Personal information is very valuable not only for itself,
[00:06:10] money is earned on...
[00:06:42] the loss of reputation is very important. We have a program, "Speak up, don't be silent," you can't be silent, you can't
[00:06:46] be silent, you need to contact
[00:06:49] and work with this, no one has the right
[00:06:53] to dispose of information about another person.
[00:07:14] Hello, you're watching "Speak Up, Don't Be Silent," and today in the studio are Tatyana Shcherbina and Victoria
[00:07:18] Popova. And today our guest is the director of the National
[00:07:21] Personal Data Protection Center, Andrey Gaev. Hello, Andrey
[00:07:24] Anatolievich. Hello. A large-scale draft law with amendments
[00:07:28] to the Law on Personal Data Protection was recently sent to the Council of
[00:07:32] Ministers. What key practical problems prompted these
[00:07:36] changes? In fact, there is nothing
[00:07:40] extraordinary, urgent, or sensational
[00:07:42] about
[00:07:45] this issue. It is routine work over
[00:07:48] 5 years that has been carried out on the application of the law on personal
[00:07:52] data protection. This is how it is accepted in our country:
[00:07:55] for a five-year period, regulatory acts are applied.
[00:07:59] If no adjustment was required earlier, and it's good when it wasn't,
[00:08:02] then after this time, an
[00:08:06] analysis of the norms is carried out to see how
[00:08:09] they work and what needs to be
[00:08:42] improved for the application. There are things that we want to
[00:08:45] simplify with
[00:08:47] the collection, dissemination of information about
[00:08:51] us. Something is missing in the legal regulation regarding, for example,
[00:08:55] issues related to artificial intelligence
[00:08:58] technologies, video and audio recording.
[00:09:01] These issues are proposed based on the
[00:09:04] results of monitoring carried out with
[00:09:08] the participation of state bodies. We
[00:09:10] organized sociological...
[00:10:12] we will then discuss what citizens' wishes have been taken into account.
[00:10:16] You said that
[00:10:19] the new norms expand the list of grounds for processing
[00:10:23] data without consent. Citizens, in which
[00:10:26] cases do we no longer need to ask
[00:10:30] for consent? For example, a common question:
[00:10:33] each of us practically deals with
[00:10:37] concluding contracts daily. And today, for example, if a mother
[00:10:40] concludes an insurance contract for her son or
[00:10:43] daughter, the daughter is a third party
[00:10:46] in a legal sense, then today the issue of processing
[00:10:50] information of this third
[00:10:53] person is not regulated
[00:10:57] by law. And, for example, for purposes related to contractual
[00:11:01] relations, when we conclude a contract with a hairdresser
[00:11:04] verbally, or buy something serious,
[00:11:07] for example, an apartment, and conclude a written sales contract,
[00:11:11] no consent is required for these relations.
[00:11:15] But when it comes to concluding a contract for the benefit of another
[00:11:18] person, when an employer insures, for example, his
[00:11:22] employees, there is a practical question here. Of course,
[00:11:25] no consents should be taken in essence, and this
[00:11:28] is directly enshrined in the draft law. For example,
[00:11:31] when a person wants to get a job and
[00:11:34] sends his resume in electronic format to
[00:11:38] the organization's email, today this is outside
[00:11:41] the scope of legal regulation. The legislation is structured so that
[00:11:44] to process personal data, either a legal norm or the consent
[00:11:48] of the person is needed. For these relations, because these are not yet employment
[00:11:51] relations, for employment relations,
[00:11:55] consent is not needed, but this is a preceding stage.
[00:11:58] Formally, consent is needed, so it will be deemed necessary to
[00:12:01] move away from this. News content on websites for
[00:12:05] state organizations, there is a government
[00:12:09] decree that states that all information that
[00:12:12] is generated in the activities of state bodies and organizations can
[00:12:16] be displayed on websites and well, accordingly, this information
[00:12:19] also includes content about a person,
[00:12:23] a participant in the event.
[00:13:25] mobile operator allows
[00:13:28] its clients,
[00:13:32] who are simultaneously clients of, for example, one of
[00:13:35] the banks, to receive a discount on their subscriber
[00:13:38] fee. Organizations hold
[00:13:41] events, conferences, seminars,
[00:13:45] training events. Several organizations unite
[00:13:48] and achieve this common
[00:13:51] goal. Organizations, for example, belonging to
[00:13:55] one industry, for example, arranging real estate, you can
[00:13:59] apply, for example, living in Gomel, for
[00:14:02] the registration of rights to real estate located in
[00:14:06] Brest. Accordingly, they also solve this common
[00:14:10] task, and they are essentially co-operators in such a
[00:14:13] situation. But how are these relationships
[00:14:15] formalized, who should interact
[00:14:19] with citizens, where are the clear boundaries between the rights and
[00:14:22] obligations of these parties?
[00:15:37] personal data processing is one of
[00:15:40] the duties of any legal entity and
[00:15:43] entrepreneur, because, of course, business is moving into the digital
[00:15:47] sphere today,
[00:15:49] and with it comes the processing of significant
[00:15:52] amounts of personal data. Money is
[00:15:55] earned on this, money is earned on our information, so
[00:15:58] the legislator said that
[00:16:01] there are a number of mandatory measures that organizations must
[00:16:05] implement. One of these measures is related to
[00:17:15] it's something similar to occupational safety, that's
[00:17:19] more understandable, it has evolved over time, there's a person
[00:17:22] in the organization responsible for occupational safety, what you're
[00:17:26] talking about, is related to attracting
[00:17:30] organizations for certain processes,
[00:17:33] other people, assistants, that is, for example, when...
[00:17:38] The same mobile operator attracts a company
[00:17:42] that deals with sending SMS
[00:17:45] messages from this operator
[00:17:48] to specific consumers
[00:17:51] of services. At this stage, at the stage
[00:17:54] of attracting other organizations,
[00:17:57] indeed there are problems and
[00:18:00] quite often they arise, based on last year's practice, and
[00:18:04] the trend continues this year, about 40.
[00:18:37] also in the draft
[00:18:39] amendment to the law on personal data protection,
[00:18:43] clearer rules for interaction
[00:18:46] between operators and authorized persons are provided. Is
[00:18:50] responsibility provided? There is responsibility, it
[00:18:53] is provided for by the Code of Administrative
[00:18:56] Offenses. It is not
[00:18:59] that great, but nevertheless, there is criminal
[00:19:02] responsibility for what to build all
[00:19:05] this, if responsible.
[00:19:37] The main block of problems arises when working
[00:19:40] with those who help the organization
[00:19:44] build their business. Organizations are held
[00:19:48] accountable. The legislator
[00:19:51] deliberately did not go for stricter administrative
[00:19:54] liability, because well, after all,
[00:19:57] the law on personal data protection also
[00:20:01] needs to be accustomed to. The practice of applying
[00:20:04] similar legislative acts worldwide shows
[00:20:08] that a certain amount of time must pass. In some countries,
[00:20:12] this takes decades to restructure
[00:20:15] business processes in organizations,
[00:20:18] to make citizens
[00:20:21] aware of the value of their personal data. Well, it's no secret that we
[00:20:24] often used to treat information
[00:20:28] about ourselves quite superficially. We
[00:20:31] did not face the other side of these
[00:20:34] phenomena, we did not see
[00:20:37] the variety of fraudulent and other
[00:20:40] negative influences on us through
[00:20:44] personal information that have fallen
[00:20:47] upon us in recent years. I
[00:20:50] understand when you simplify, that is, you don't have to sign
[00:20:53] a paper in every household chemicals store
[00:20:57] when you get a discount card.
[00:21:00] This was already, you know, on the verge of paranoia. That is, it's
[00:21:03] a waste of paper, in my opinion, and
[00:21:06] how exactly will we get used to this
[00:21:10] idea that there should be digital hygiene, if in every
[00:21:13] store we sign consent to something, and we don't know where this
[00:21:17] database will end up next time, and responsibly.
[00:22:20] when we see that
[00:22:24] the way this process of collecting, using,
[00:22:26] disseminating and otherwise processing personal data is built,
[00:22:30] it can simply lead, or is already leading, to catastrophic consequences in the near future. In order
[00:22:34] to prevent these
[00:22:37] unfavorable consequences, the center is endowed
[00:22:40] with the right to consider complaints, issue
[00:22:44] mandatory compliance orders regarding the
[00:22:48] implementation of legislation. When
[00:22:50] we see that orders are not
[00:22:53] being fulfilled, this rarely happens, but
[00:22:56] it does happen. We send materials to the internal affairs bodies, they
[00:23:00] are authorized to prosecute offenders for
[00:23:03] administrative or other liability provided for by law. But I can
[00:23:06] definitely say that fines are not the
[00:23:10] issue here. This five-year
[00:23:13] experience of applying the law on personal data protection shows
[00:23:17] this transformation of views, not only
[00:23:20] among citizens, but also among organizations regarding the construction of their
[00:23:23] business processes. Organizations today treat
[00:23:26] personal data processing differently. They understand that
[00:23:30] often this is their competitive advantage,
[00:23:33] and here, besides the fine, the loss
[00:23:37] of reputation is very important.
[00:23:38] Organizations
[00:23:41] are afraid to lose personal data
[00:23:44] and give it to an uncontrolled sphere, because
[00:23:46] this entails a serious outflow
[00:23:50] of clients, it entails serious financial losses.
[00:23:54] Last year, one of the information
[00:23:58] resources of a trade organization was suspended for
[00:24:01] several days, and accordingly, the organization suffered
[00:24:05] six-figure losses, it just suffered losses due to
[00:24:08] similar outflows of clients, they lost money, and
[00:24:12] of course, we understand that
[00:24:15] there is still a long way to go in forming
[00:24:18] competent
[00:24:20] application of personal
[00:24:24] data legislation, but already
[00:24:28] 92% of organizations, according to sociological
[00:24:32] research, note
[00:24:35] the importance of personal data protection
[00:24:38] and the necessity of dealing with these issues, and
[00:24:42] more than half of those
[00:24:45] surveyed stated that creating
[00:24:48] competitive advantages in organizing
[00:24:52] proper personal data protection within organizations
[00:24:55] themselves, although you are right, there are enough problems. Recently
[00:24:58] we checked one of the large trading
[00:25:01] operators, neither the person responsible for internal
[00:25:05] control, nor a clear understanding of who
[00:25:08] personal data is transferred to, unfortunately, is still
[00:25:11] not visible. In another large
[00:25:14] entity, a person dealing with personal
[00:25:17] data protection is even,
[00:25:21] let's say, very far away, for a few minutes a day, and
[00:25:23] at the same time, in essence, there, well, probably
[00:25:26] at least, well, I'll say, a large, large part
[00:25:30] of our citizens interact with this
[00:25:33] organization, transferring personal data there. I believe this
[00:25:37] is due to staff turnover, because there are constantly new young people
[00:25:41] appearing, you know, they don't even know, the girl
[00:25:44] said, you compared it very well with labor
[00:25:47] protection. Approximately, that's how it
[00:25:50] becomes routine, yes, well, some quarterly
[00:25:54] marking of something, and what we ourselves don't fully understand. Nevertheless, in
[00:25:57] 2026, statistics showed that the number
[00:26:00] of citizen complaints about...
[00:27:23] In order to correctly organize personal data processing, there is all the methodology, step-by-step action algorithms,
[00:27:26] checklists, and template documents on the website of the National
[00:27:30] Personal Data Protection Center. Everything can
[00:27:33] be taken and adapted to your activities, that's
[00:27:36] the first thing. Second, one of
[00:27:39] the mandatory, again, measures for any organization is training its
[00:27:43] employees. This is also a big problem
[00:27:46] that many incidents arise precisely due to
[00:27:50] the fault of the organization's employees. Therefore,
[00:27:53] everyone, as in the field of labor protection, needs to be
[00:27:57] informed about what needs to be done at their workplaces.
[00:28:01] It is also necessary to ensure this necessary
[00:28:05] level of access, so that, conditionally, an employee of the human resources department does not
[00:28:09] have access to what the accountant
[00:28:12] works with.
[00:28:15] This training can be organized within the organization
[00:28:19] itself, that is, all the materials for this are also on
[00:28:22] the website of the National Personal Data Protection Center.
[00:28:25] And once every 5 years, such training in the organization
[00:28:28] is mandatory and should be carried out, and...
[00:30:02] about what can be recorded on a phone, what audio files,
[00:30:06] video, and what cannot, and for now let's take a short break,
[00:30:22] "Speak Up, Don't Be Silent" is on air again, and today our guest is the Director of the National Personal
[00:30:26] Data Protection Center, Andrey Gaev. Andrey Anatolyevich,
[00:30:29] it's a very big challenge, probably for...
[00:31:02] a lot of tasks, allows
[00:31:05] to calculate faster, analyze faster,
[00:31:09] give quite good quality results in education and economics,
[00:31:13] that's what we see in... uploaded
[00:31:45] to
[00:31:53] artificial intelligence systems sensitive
[00:31:56] data, amounting to tens of thousands of positions, to
[00:32:00] solve some of their tasks. An Excel file, you just put it there, and
[00:32:04] it's one thing if a person calculated it himself for some time,
[00:32:08] another thing to get an almost instant answer from it. At the same
[00:32:11] time, commercial information went into uncontrolled access:
[00:35:45] final decision, a person makes or still a factor, for now, the human
[00:35:48] factor makes the decision. If a person finds the strength and time to contact the
[00:35:52] central head office, find a specialist and sort something
[00:35:55] out there, then of course the human factor makes the final decision,
[00:35:59] but again, it's all, but again,
[00:36:02] if one of us
[00:36:05] feels, knows that a decision
[00:36:08] was made without considering all the circumstances related to
[00:36:12] their situation, you need to act. It's
[00:36:15] a program, speak up, don't be silent, you can't be silent, you can't be silent, you need to
[00:36:18] address it and work with it. By the way, an interesting point
[00:36:22] about the application of personal data legislation, returning to the topic
[00:36:26] of complaints, of which there are more,
[00:37:27] personal data. I never wrote anything to anyone, but here,
[00:37:31] as an ordinary citizen, I
[00:37:34] couldn't pass by, because in one of
[00:37:37] the cases, my data, which I changed
[00:37:41] in one of my personal accounts many years
[00:37:44] ago, for some reason remained unchanged with
[00:37:48] the same operator, with the same organization, several
[00:37:52] years later, when they sent me a
[00:37:55] sensitive message.
[00:38:57] disseminate information without the consent of another
[00:39:00] person about himself, but when
[00:39:03] you encounter the issue
[00:39:07] of improper application of legislation, but if we remain
[00:39:09] silent, then how will the situation improve? And
[00:39:13] in no case do I want to say that our organizations are not
[00:39:17] working. We see that this is a two-way street
[00:39:20] and what your research has led to. You
[00:39:24] said you need to understand the situation in the first and second cases. This is a
[00:39:28] mistake, the human factor is most often just
[00:39:31] or systemic.
[00:39:34] In my situations, it was directly
[00:39:38] the human factor, and you know,
[00:39:42] those incidents that occurred this year and those notifications that
[00:39:46] we receive, they just speak of
[00:39:48] the prevailing dominance, even
[00:39:52] of the human factor causing
[00:39:55] the problem over technology, that is, even...
[00:40:27] The investigation had already taken place based on the
[00:40:31] current situation, it was evident
[00:40:33] that in a number of cases, people did not realize the significance of what
[00:40:37] they were doing. They did not understand what exactly
[00:40:40] they were violating, they may have guessed,
[00:40:42] but
[00:40:44] the extent of responsibility and harm they caused, they always
[00:40:48] saw this. Belarus plans to
[00:40:52] more strictly regulate the use of audio recording and
[00:40:55] video surveillance. Tell us about it?
[00:41:41] audio recordings also at one time
[00:41:44] concerned emergency service workers,
[00:41:48] and there is a regulation allowing
[00:41:51] audio recording in emergency medical
[00:41:54] services. Similar regulation exists in the activities of mobile
[00:41:58] operators, when we contact them on the line to resolve certain
[00:42:01] issues, based on the nature of the discussed topic,
[00:42:05] corresponding recordings are made from October
[00:42:07] 5th by controllers. Yes.
[00:43:10] was recorded to improve quality, such situations also
[00:43:13] happen, but total
[00:43:17] video recording and
[00:43:20] audio recording in such situations has a very
[00:43:23] sensitive side to the issue,
[00:43:26] because there are situations, and not so
[00:43:29] rare, when in a doctor's office cameras are installed
[00:43:33] in rooms where people change clothes, a person
[00:43:36] is heard, examined.
[00:43:40] and a camera hangs there. In this situation, in order
[00:43:43] to make this recording, the patient's consent
[00:43:46] is generally required, if he agrees to it. Otherwise,
[00:43:49] as a general rule,
[00:43:52] unequivocally,
[00:43:54] a person must have the private opportunity
[00:43:58] to resolve the issue without
[00:44:01] this recording. That is, for example, if a person
[00:44:05] sees that video recording is taking place in
[00:44:08] a doctor's office, for example, they
[00:44:12] can ask for the recording to be stopped, and they
[00:44:15] have the right to refuse or not? They definitely
[00:44:18] do not have the right to continue making this recording
[00:44:21] if such a request is made.
[00:44:25] There is no legal basis to start this
[00:44:28] recording without the person's consent, but if it has happened, the person has the right
[00:44:31] to demand that this recording be stopped, deleted,
[00:44:35] and accordingly, the
[00:44:38] organization has the same obligation to
[00:44:42] comply with this request.
[00:44:44] Both the employer and the service provider
[00:44:48] must ensure
[00:44:51] the non-excessiveness of personal data processing and the existence of a legitimate
[00:44:54] basis. In the same medical center, of course,
[00:44:57] you can record premises, places where
[00:45:01] medical drugs, psychotropic substances, or
[00:45:05] other items are located. You can record without the person's consent.
[00:45:09] In resuscitation departments,
[00:45:12] where constant monitoring of the person's condition is necessary,
[00:45:16] accordingly, if a complex operation is being performed,
[00:45:19] specialists from outside are involved
[00:45:23] for telemedicine, so for providing
[00:45:26] consultative medical assistance, you can also
[00:45:29] record. The same applies to ordinary employers. If
[00:45:33] it's a warehouse, working with material assets, it's about
[00:45:36] the safety of these assets, so you can record
[00:45:40] what is happening. But if
[00:45:44] the camera's angle of view is on a person engaged in
[00:45:47] ordinary office activities,
[00:45:50] then the purpose of controlling discipline
[00:45:53] and installing a camera is not proportional to the circumstances
[00:45:57] of personal data processing, and we encounter situations when sometimes
[00:46:01] in order to, well, frankly speaking, get rid of a
[00:46:04] specific employee, a camera is installed over the workplace
[00:46:08] of one of them, and accordingly, well,
[00:46:11] a person, well, during the day, accumulates some set
[00:46:14] of circumstances and complains to you, they were fired, and you help
[00:46:18] them get reinstated in their workplace. We won't help them get reinstated
[00:46:22] in their job, because this
[00:46:25] is also a question
[00:46:27] of the existence of grounds for processing violations of personal
[00:46:31] data legislation, of course, in such situations, then we
[00:46:35] establish. All of us have phones, can we record everywhere
[00:46:38] now? Everything
[00:46:42] I see. Again, no one has the
[00:46:45] right to dispose of information about another
[00:46:49] person, this can only be done...
[00:48:03] Back on air, "Speak Up, Don't Be Silent," and today our guest is the director of the
[00:48:06] National Personal Data Protection Center, Andrey
[00:48:10] Gaev. Andrey Anatolyevich, how does the right to be
[00:48:13] forgotten work? If a person wants to completely disappear
[00:48:16] from the databases of an online store or some
[00:48:19] advertising service, where should they start?
[00:49:22] the seller to keep the contract for 3
[00:49:26] years, and if a tax audit was not conducted, then for
[00:49:29] 10 years, that is, there is legislation, for example, on archival matters.
[00:49:32] paperwork, which obliges processing
[00:49:36] also in the form of storage during a certain
[00:49:39] period of time, therefore if
[00:49:42] consent, personal data was used,
[00:49:45] consent can be revoked, if there are no grounds for processing
[00:49:49] personal data, then no,
[00:50:52] consent, but it is not subject to withdrawal from circulation, uh-huh, well, it's
[00:50:56] time to ask you what digital hygiene rules you
[00:51:00] use, do you multiply
[00:51:04] loyalty cards from stores or on the contrary do not play these
[00:51:08] games, at some point in my life, when
[00:51:12] these cards started appearing, I played,
[00:51:14] then to my surprise I found that my wallet had swollen
[00:51:18] somehow, and then, then
[00:51:21] the situation changed, then
[00:51:25] actions and negative ones that we all
[00:51:28] hear about, and you know, the general trend, again,
[00:51:32] returning to the sociological research, we
[00:51:34] conducted the first in twenty-second year, now
[00:51:38] in twenty-sixth, and as
[00:51:41] for loyalty cards,
[00:51:43] if
[00:51:46] before, literally 4 years ago,
[00:51:49] about 25%
[00:51:52] of people were not willing to give
[00:51:56] personal data in exchange for a small discount in
[00:51:59] stores, now that percentage has changed,
[00:52:03] now about 60%, I say:
[00:52:35] I am not calling anyone, of course, to such actions as
[00:52:38] myself, it's only about awareness, why do you need it,
[00:52:42] yes, why do you need it, this is key, you are right,
[00:52:45] a very low percentage
[00:52:48] of discount, and here the game is never worth the candle, and
[00:52:51] it seems to me that this high percentage of refuseniks, so-called,
[00:52:55] will stimulate enterprises to offer some
[00:52:59] more significant bonuses for
[00:53:02] our personal data, you know, and so... on the
[00:53:05] other hand, we see that organizations, the same trade and
[00:53:09] services, they
[00:53:11] have already, many of them, a significant path of increasing
[00:53:14] the effectiveness of information protection and personal data, in particular,
[00:53:18] have gone through, they are dealing with these issues at a sufficiently serious
[00:53:22] level, very many organizations, it's true, we are happy to hear that, do you yourself
[00:53:25] use public Wi-Fi networks, maybe you have
[00:53:29] some applications from large foreign
[00:53:31] marketplaces installed, as for...
[00:53:35] public networks,
[00:53:37] I use them where I understand that it's safe, for example, when
[00:53:41] I come to our airport, I understand, for some
[00:53:45] reasons, it is necessary for some
[00:53:49] data to pass faster, if suddenly
[00:53:51] through mobile communication of the operator something
[00:53:54] passes a little slower, then in such situations
[00:53:58] I use it, but if I need to enter some data,
[00:54:02] no, no, I never do this,
[00:54:05] certainly not in my life, as for social
[00:54:09] networks, you know,
[00:54:12] I have enough to do
[00:54:15] to live my life differently, I am not
[00:54:18] ready to spend it
[00:54:21] contemplating someone else's life participating in
[00:54:25] discussions of those personal relationships that
[00:54:28] occur between others, I am not
[00:54:31] interested, I find answers to my questions
[00:54:35] in the classic internet, again, God forbid, I don't call for anything,
[00:54:39] well, for me it's
[00:54:41] like this, I spend contemplating
[00:54:45] the mobile phone screen somewhere from an hour to an hour and a half, and I say
[00:54:48] that this is a lot, I thought about
[00:54:52] field of personal data protection, we know that we are
[00:54:56] being listened to, and in some incredible way, I just
[00:54:59] hugged a singer in the corridor here, and they are already offering
[00:55:03] me her concert?
[00:55:43] maybe, and if I refuse, well, then Google will refuse me, that is, you understand, it's a one-sided game,
[00:55:46] absolutely fair, therefore.