CANALCATORCE — broadcast
20260914 150000 UTC
511 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] of Mexico, 42
[00:00:03] years ago, other lands
[00:00:07] I acquired them in
[00:00:09] 1992
[00:00:13] of the 34 years ago,
[00:00:17] so these in their criticism, in
[00:00:21] their perverse campaign eh,
[00:00:25] they manage it as if I had acquired it yesterday,
[00:00:28] as if... I have been a month
[00:00:30] ago when they have
[00:00:33] 42 and 34 years that I
[00:00:36] acquired them, I wasn't even
[00:00:39] raises the level of in public service, I was dedicated
[00:00:42] to private
[00:00:45] activities, they also refer to a
[00:00:48] house in Tlalpan that
[00:00:52] I acquired 25 years ago
[00:00:55] with a credit with
[00:00:58] Banamex.
[00:01:01] and all that they
[00:01:02] continue to comply with put it as if I bought it in
[00:01:06] cash, as if it were
[00:01:08] the product of embezzlement of
[00:01:12] funds, of a corrupt
[00:01:14] act, and I take this opportunity,
[00:01:18] thank you president, to tell you that we are not all equal, they are corrupt
[00:01:22] who dedicate themselves to lying and get paid for
[00:01:25] it, we are not all equal, I have
[00:01:29] how... the little I have or what
[00:01:32] I have and they also
[00:01:36] talk about a couple of apartments of 74
[00:01:39] m that I signed a
[00:01:42] purchase agreement for those apartments on
[00:01:46] March 9, 2018 why
[00:01:49] a purchase agreement because the
[00:01:53] the population, even building was being built, they were in the foundations and
[00:01:56] these pre-purchase methods that
[00:01:59] one eh makes the commitment, are cheaper
[00:02:03] and were
[00:02:05] in some places it started with finished building 2 years later, and
[00:02:08] I went to the bank to Vancommer, in the case of
[00:02:11] the house in Tlalpan, which I acquired 25 years ago, I
[00:02:15] took out the credit with Banamex, these two
[00:02:18] apartments, 2 years after I signed
[00:02:21] that eh, I went with Bancommer and
[00:02:25] took out mortgage loans for both apartments,
[00:02:28] but... They say that I acquired them in
[00:02:32] cash, as if I had the
[00:02:34] money, there was
[00:02:37] it, then the vast majority of one of the media outlets, TV Azteca, this
[00:02:41] Mr. La Torre eh who
[00:02:45] claimed that I had
[00:02:48] 50 million pesos to
[00:02:51] spend and that where I had
[00:02:54] gotten it
[00:02:56] and that is a lie, absolutely a lie.
[00:03:01] eh they dared to say
[00:03:04] that I was hiding
[00:03:06] because it does not appear in my
[00:03:09] declaration that I was hiding
[00:03:12] cars, jewelry
[00:03:14] and works of art,
[00:03:18] in my life, I don't have a car, I have had
[00:03:22] a car, at this moment I don't have a car, never
[00:03:25] ever in my life have I bought jewelry,
[00:03:28] but I don't come from a family with those customs or with that
[00:03:32] socioeconomic level, I am not
[00:03:34] used to that, I have never bought jewelry and
[00:03:38] works of art much less,
[00:03:40] but where did they get it from, well, from the fact that they didn't see it in the
[00:03:43] box of the asset declaration and it
[00:03:47] was very easy for them
[00:03:49] to invent, all this we
[00:03:53] clarified yesterday,
[00:03:56] starts the we published a statement to public opinion,
[00:04:00] and a video where I explain
[00:04:04] all this in detail because
[00:04:07] it is eh these current
[00:04:10] media
[00:04:12] a factor in eh have perverted, have
[00:04:14] degenerated the job of communicating to
[00:04:18] people and as it is about hitting,
[00:04:23] because from as it is about defaming, as it is about they have
[00:04:25] not liked this program of the president
[00:04:28] of
[00:04:30] housing for well-being,
[00:04:33] down, that's what so angry, because this evidently
[00:04:36] has brought us, well I
[00:04:38] to produce housing or understand, good things that are helping people and we have
[00:04:42] to find a way to distort,
[00:04:46] even be able to build what to point out that there are acts of corruption,
[00:04:48] and I take this opportunity to tell you again, we are not
[00:05:07] president, we visited the Coyoacán utopia, which now
[00:05:11] provides public services. the population
[00:05:14] is in a building that before
[00:05:16] was eh housed the Banco del
[00:05:20] Atlántico which was chaired by Carlos Savedró, who was
[00:05:22] also president
[00:05:25] eh the president of the bankers during the banking crisis
[00:05:29] of López Portillo, the spaces of this building, president, are
[00:05:33] enormous and provide services such as
[00:05:37] therapies, eh health services,
[00:05:39] dining room,
[00:05:42] eh, care services are now provided to the
[00:05:45] population, eh, children, adults, seniors
[00:05:49] who are looking for a safe place to have
[00:05:53] a safe space. The Coyoacán utopia, president, tells
[00:05:56] us how the economy transformed into an approach
[00:06:00] to benefit certain vulnerable
[00:06:03] groups, people who were never seen
[00:06:07] by neoliberal governments, will it be
[00:06:10] president, that if we.
[00:06:15] the issue of the Debroa debts,
[00:06:23] about the Debroa, I promised you that the
[00:06:27] Secretary of Finance will come when the reports are finished,
[00:06:31] that property,
[00:06:34] I know it because I lived very
[00:06:36] close by
[00:06:39] in the San Lucas neighborhood in Coyoacán during my adolescence.
[00:06:42] I already lived there with my parents and
[00:06:45] the corner was the parián, it was a
[00:06:48] self-service store
[00:06:51] at the time, then
[00:06:58] Rojo was mayor of Coyoacán,
[00:07:02] she acquired that property, she
[00:07:04] had the idea that the main property of the
[00:07:07] mayor's office, the one in the center of Tlalpan, would be a
[00:07:10] museum and that the offices would go there, but
[00:07:14] people didn't like it, there was social conflict, it wasn't a bad idea, but
[00:07:18] people didn't like it, those who lived around because there is a school there,
[00:07:22] this the hospital for the blind, in short,
[00:07:25] so they thought there would be too much traffic in that
[00:07:28] area, and it remained abandoned
[00:07:30] for a long time, eh, then what we wanted
[00:07:34] to do was a pilares, which are the projects that
[00:07:37] we designed when I was there and now Clara has already
[00:07:40] converted it into a utopia and people are very happy, honestly,
[00:07:44] so that's
[00:07:47] good for Coyoacán, for the city and for the
[00:08:00] Rodríguez from Chapucero and from Izquierda Noticias, speaking of
[00:08:04] well, the hoaxes of the week, I also want to comment on one that was launched a few
[00:08:08] days ago, the portal of Carmen Aristegui
[00:08:11] this note is published on this portal, a note that refers
[00:08:15] to another media outlet, News
[00:08:18] Nation, and this media refers to a
[00:08:22] State Department document that nobody knows, and that
[00:08:25] State Department document refers to a poll that nobody
[00:08:29] knows either, it has no sources
[00:08:32] or company or nothing,
[00:08:36] but this poll published like this responds,
[00:08:40] it says that the majority of Mexicans
[00:08:43] agree to foreign intervention in our
[00:08:46] country, even extrajudicial, that
[00:08:50] foreigners precisely enter to combat criminal cartels
[00:08:54] and Mexicans agree on this reason, but it is built like
[00:08:58] this, no, a poll that nobody sees through
[00:09:01] a right-wing American
[00:09:04] portal through this Carmen Aristegui report,
[00:09:08] well, Carmen Aristegui's portal, what do you think about this
[00:09:12] president?
[00:09:19] it here, wanting Mexico to be
[00:09:25] the November US election,
[00:09:29] because this type of news that
[00:09:32] has no basis, at least its
[00:09:35] source is
[00:09:37] dubious,
[00:09:40] can impact Mexico. not so much the truth because
[00:09:44] it is so absurd that it really doesn't impact,
[00:09:47] but they want to impact the United States,
[00:09:50] eh, that's the first thing, and as we have always
[00:09:54] said, the issue of the US
[00:09:57] election, let them define it there, Mexico does not have to be
[00:10:00] a factor in their election, we are
[00:10:02] not a piñata nor
[00:10:06] a matter of the Americans,
[00:10:10] eh, we collaborate, we coordinate, there are 40 million Mexicans
[00:10:13] there, many of them with dual nationality
[00:10:17] and obviously we have a lot in common, but the US
[00:10:21] election is defined by the US problem.
[00:10:25] and in any case what proposals they have, that
[00:10:28] is our point of
[00:10:38] later a note came out, I asked
[00:10:42] the General Secretary
[00:10:44] today because a note came out from the North
[00:10:47] Command saying that the coordination with
[00:10:51] Mexico is extraordinary, the North Command is
[00:10:55] the US Army, so the US Army
[00:10:59] says: we coordinate very well with Mexico, they release
[00:11:02] it, and according to this note, the
[00:11:06] work done in Mexico is very bad, it is
[00:11:08] terrible, everything they have said and therefore
[00:11:12] the United States should intervene in Mexico, but also Mexicans agree,
[00:11:15] and then it was published in a national
[00:11:18] media, so it is part of
[00:11:22] this.
[00:11:25] information, in quotation marks, that only seeks
[00:11:28] to provoke internally,
[00:11:32] now we can look for polls
[00:11:35] to see, we look
[00:11:37] for
[00:11:40] one, do you remember president, that those who agree to
[00:11:44] US intervention and more than
[00:11:47] 70% are against,
[00:11:50] so it's absurd, it's truly
[00:11:53] absurd, it's before coming and not
[00:11:57] just 9% agree
[00:11:59] to an intervention like the one that, well
[00:12:02] 81% against, exactly, yes, in this
[00:12:06] case, the truth is that's why it's called it's a madness and what's also interesting
[00:12:10] president is that 91%, I'm sorry, 91%, yes
[00:12:13] only 9% would be, and what's interesting,
[00:12:17] however, president, is that a former director or former head of the
[00:12:20] DEA refers to a source and the source
[00:12:24] is, as strange as it may seem, Simon Levi, a poll that
[00:12:28] this great mythomaniac publishes, honestly, and he refers
[00:12:32] to this, I'm not saying it's the direct source of Carmen
[00:12:35] Aristegui's portal, and I want to comment on it, but yes, at the same time, president, it also
[00:12:39] comes out as part of a strategy to
[00:12:43] justify precisely that Mexicans
[00:12:46] are in favor of a foreign military intervention in our
[00:13:02] Mexicans, because of our history, because of what
[00:13:05] we are, because of our nationalist sense, because of
[00:13:09] the pride of being Mexicans and because they also see that work is being
[00:13:13] done, are against foreign
[00:13:16] intervention, whatever it may be, and particularly the United
[00:13:19] States, and we will always defend
[00:13:23] that there should be no intervention.
[00:13:26] eh, that there is no interference, that we only talk about
[00:13:29] coordination and also without
[00:13:31] subordination,
[00:13:34] eh, that will always be our position, by
[00:13:37] principle, by history, by conviction
[00:13:40] and because that is also what our
[00:13:49] one would have to ask
[00:13:52] that...
[00:13:55] to spread that Mexicans have another opinion,
[00:13:58] well, some sectors of the United States,
[00:14:02] to these, well, who are propaganda
[00:14:06] media of the right, who are looking for
[00:14:09] intervention,
[00:14:12] I said the other day it's incredible,
[00:14:14] imagine
[00:14:16] eh, that one of the political parties
[00:14:21] electoral moment in the country and they decide to go to Europe.
[00:14:27] It's really
[00:14:28] incredible,
[00:14:33] incredible, they are like the conservatives of the 19th
[00:14:35] century, they go to Europe, why do they go to
[00:14:39] Europe, so that from outside Mexico is influenced,
[00:14:42] México,
[00:14:45] the thing is that they are more and more liars
[00:14:49] and more and more people believe
[00:14:52] them less, there will be a
[00:14:55] saturation where they will lose rating, they will
[00:14:59] lose subscribers because
[00:15:02] they will be left with the percentage of those who want
[00:15:05] to listen to them,
[00:15:26] what do you think should be the participation of the United States,
[00:15:29] cooperation without subordination,
[00:15:32] 50%. None, only the governments of Mexico
[00:15:36] should fight. 33% of
[00:15:39] intervention, the United States can carry out
[00:15:41] operations to detain or eliminate members of organized
[00:15:45] crime in the country, only
[00:15:47] 9%, don't know, no answer,
[00:15:51] 8%,
[00:15:55] well yes, the majority, the vast majority of Mexicans obviously do not want any type
[00:15:58] of foreign intervention and yes the coordination as you
[00:16:08] see it in a quick reflection what is happening in Mexico happens in South America in
[00:16:12] particular and I don't think it's just fake
[00:16:16] news as such traditional but it's a deliberate strategy
[00:16:18] where these factions
[00:16:22] factions of the
[00:16:25] US government, Republican oilmen
[00:16:28] financing sinister characters like
[00:16:31] this Mr. Fernando Cerimedo this Argentine to
[00:16:35] generate bot farms, generate. a trend with
[00:16:38] a purpose, not to distort, but to be able to
[00:16:42] influence regime changes to bring
[00:16:45] presidents or very close figures to
[00:16:49] these American factions and
[00:16:52] that they surrender sovereignty, surrender
[00:16:55] oil wealth, surrender lithium, surrender
[00:16:58] gold, so president, my question is, while
[00:17:02] obviously this is a media counterweight in the morning, are there
[00:17:05] diplomatic counterweights, no, could
[00:17:09] you see now that new artificial intelligence and social media
[00:17:12] laws are being promoted, a more intense,
[00:17:16] stronger legal and juridical shield, for example,
[00:17:19] there in Brazil there are
[00:17:22] decrees, eh, there are also resolutions of the Brazilian
[00:17:26] Supreme Court precisely that when they start
[00:17:30] to see this type of campaigns, they
[00:17:33] automatically send them to the platforms to close them
[00:17:36] and take them down, no, now. right now in Chile, after what happened with Cerimedo, there are
[00:17:39] initiatives so that there is even
[00:17:43] a penalty for the use of vote farms, that people go to jail,
[00:17:46] if it is indeed shown, here, president, do you see a
[00:17:50] scenario where there could be such a similar situation
[00:17:54] in these new reforms of
[00:17:56] social
[00:18:00] networks of artificial intelligence to precisely
[00:18:03] well yes, one thing is freedom of expression president, and well it's good that people
[00:18:07] have the right sometimes to say things, but this is not
[00:18:10] freedom of expression, this is a deliberate
[00:18:13] strategy, so to speak, of foreign intervention so
[00:18:17] that at the end of the day, here in Mexico, the far
[00:18:21] right governs, really governs a
[00:18:25] there is a kind of viceroy, so to speak, no, that we are again a
[00:18:28] colony, yes, it is a pending
[00:18:32] discussion, how to regulate
[00:18:35] social networks and artificial intelligence
[00:18:39] eh,
[00:18:46] it has its nuances,
[00:18:55] artificial intelligence, we put a norm in plan A that
[00:18:59] I sent that said, let it say in large letters that
[00:19:02] artificial intelligence in political campaigns
[00:19:05] and no, well, some
[00:19:08] parties did not want to vote for that
[00:19:11] reform,
[00:19:16] I think that it does need to be regulated, but there has to be a very
[00:19:19] broad discussion, what we do not want is for it to be
[00:19:23] taken as censorship by the
[00:19:25] government,
[00:19:28] because if it is already as if we censor, when we do not
[00:19:31] censor,
[00:19:34] then we do not want there to be now a discussion.
[00:19:37] that now in the middle of the electoral period, the
[00:19:40] censorship of the president, the
[00:19:48] from the morning conference, the right of reply and other
[00:19:51] mechanisms, well, is to disseminate what happens on social
[00:19:55] networks,
[00:20:00] the campaign I did from 24 to date, 2
[00:20:04] years, social networks have changed a lot. and
[00:20:07] there were already bots and there were already campaigns and, but now it's another
[00:20:11] thing, the
[00:20:14] issue
[00:20:17] of scrolling, as they call this anglicism of moving the
[00:20:20] screen permanently, of the videos that
[00:20:23] appear, of the algorithms
[00:20:27] linked to what you see, of the
[00:20:29] control that the owners of the
[00:20:33] platforms
[00:20:36] the complaints. that have been coming out from
[00:20:40] people who worked on the platforms
[00:20:43] saying that they are purposefully generating
[00:20:47] addiction to... products
[00:20:51] to content, well obviously it is
[00:20:55] something we have to discuss,
[00:20:58] so first we open the discussion about schools
[00:21:02] which is very important eh because
[00:21:05] even in this PISA test it was shown that in all countries in the world it has affected
[00:21:08] a lot eh platforms
[00:21:11] so the issue of schools but a discussion
[00:21:15] must necessarily be opened about the
[00:21:18] use of platforms.
[00:21:20] as a means of bought political
[00:21:24] campaign, the more money and the use of these
[00:21:27] bots eh and other mechanisms to
[00:21:31] influence through fake news
[00:21:34] on the conscience of people and they have been used
[00:21:38] in Latin America and in other
[00:21:40] countries, so I think that
[00:21:44] we should open a space for discussion, now
[00:21:47] well, the electoral period has already begun. I don't know if it can
[00:22:01] poll, more people are informed today by social networks
[00:22:05] than by television,
[00:22:07] in 2 years
[00:22:09] it changed, so
[00:22:13] eh, it is very relevant and the
[00:22:16] mechanisms that the international right uses to
[00:22:20] modify the opinion of people through fake
[00:22:37] well, first of all, it must be recognized, and I think it has not been recognized
[00:22:40] much honestly, this proposal that goes against the current, for
[00:22:44] example, in the United States, Canada and Europe where the majority of young people
[00:22:48] do not really have access
[00:22:50] to affordable housing at their age, they will probably never
[00:22:54] have housing, and the fact that here they do, whether it's 1, 18, 19, 20,
[00:22:57] 25, is a very important thing, but at the same
[00:23:01] time, president, it somehow clashes with a new reality or
[00:23:04] vice of the new times, no, I call it the
[00:23:08] Mexican dream, the Mexican dream is
[00:23:10] to earn in dollars and spend in pesos
[00:23:14] and Mexico being a very friendly country to come to,
[00:23:18] we saw it in the World Cup, many want to come here.
[00:23:20] foreigners generating gentrification and
[00:23:24] at the same time also generating displacement, not
[00:23:27] of people in large cities like Mexico City but
[00:23:31] also in other places like Zapopan or Tijuana
[00:23:34] or in the Mayan Riviera, not
[00:23:38] of families who live there and then their rents are raised and at the same
[00:23:42] time, president, it combines with the appearance of more real estate
[00:23:45] cartels like the one in Mexico City but they also report that there are
[00:23:49] other similar schemes, similar, not necessarily
[00:23:52] identical, but also there in Jalisco, also in Baja
[00:23:55] California, that is, also in places where it is really arriving, that
[00:23:59] is, it is a new vice, so to speak, no, that is being
[00:24:03] faced, this particular
[00:24:06] situation, president, how to address it, because finally, I believe that after the
[00:24:10] World Cup, many more foreigners will come to live here and what happens and
[00:24:14] I my own sister lives here and they already asked her
[00:24:17] to leave, the rent is over and they are going to raise it by like 20,
[00:24:20] 25%, no, and it's all legal, but well, it will happen and
[00:24:24] it is happening like this, how how, how do you see this
[00:24:27] situation,
[00:24:31] first it is important eh, because there are
[00:24:34] governments that promote gentrification
[00:24:37] and with corruption, as we denounced at the time when I was head of
[00:24:41] government, the real estate cartel of the Benito
[00:24:44] Juárez borough, that public officials enriched themselves
[00:24:48] from the use of land, essentially
[00:24:52] like that, in a few words,
[00:24:54] eh, how they asked for bribes,
[00:24:57] increasing the number of floors that could be built in a
[00:25:01] place, or allowing a building to be
[00:25:04] built, when in reality only a two-story
[00:25:08] house could be built,
[00:25:11] that is, let's say, the essence of the real estate cartel, violating the land
[00:25:14] use, from the
[00:25:17] bribe of the
[00:25:20] official
[00:25:25] eh, or even even
[00:25:28] threatening the real estate developer, if you don't
[00:25:32] comply with so many, then I'm going to shut you down and you won't
[00:25:36] you were going to build, that's the
[00:25:38] real estate cartel that developed here in Benito Juárez in Mexico
[00:25:42] City and indeed there are other places where
[00:25:45] it probably exists and in any case
[00:25:48] it has to be
[00:25:51] eh, but there are governments that do not promote
[00:25:55] gentrification, how do I know what gentrification
[00:25:57] is, removing those who lived
[00:26:00] originally in a place? and that people of another
[00:26:04] economic level arrive, with another type of constructions
[00:26:08] and that the housing is of
[00:26:11] such a price that only a percentage
[00:26:15] population can acquire it, that is, let's say, in a few words, the
[00:26:18] gentrification, many governments, not only
[00:26:22] from Mexico but from other places, for example, they used to
[00:26:25] raise the property tax in
[00:26:28] certain areas, so people can no longer pay their
[00:26:31] property tax. So they have to sell and
[00:26:35] whoever buys it helped
[00:26:38] by the government
[00:26:41] housing or land use, so it
[00:26:45] gentrifies certain areas here in Mexico
[00:26:48] City, well, for some time, at least since
[00:26:51] we arrived because, let's say, with Mancera, the
[00:26:55] real estate cartel developed to
[00:26:57] an impressive extent. When we arrived
[00:27:01] they even forced us to stop construction in the
[00:27:04] city, but we had to put things in order, because
[00:27:08] land use was really being violated, and people were very
[00:27:11] upset,
[00:27:14] and Clara is a head of government who is not in that
[00:27:17] dynamic and on the contrary is looking for this
[00:27:20] phenomenon not to happen in
[00:27:41] time, housing developers dedicated themselves to
[00:27:44] building housing above 5 million
[00:27:48] pesos, who
[00:27:50] can acquire a house above 5 million pesos? Well, only a very small sector of
[00:27:56] it was my turn as head of government to tell them, hey, build
[00:27:59] housing for one million pesos.
[00:28:02] Master plans were made,
[00:28:08] this and in other places they didn't want to, they said: no, no,
[00:28:11] we have business with 5 million, well, having
[00:28:15] a government social housing program,
[00:28:18] it turns out that
[00:28:21] private companies are already building
[00:28:25] social housing too,
[00:28:28] so they no longer only build 5 million, perhaps they are not
[00:28:31] 600... because it is a special characteristic
[00:28:35] where municipalities, states donate the land
[00:28:39] to build housing, but these are already
[00:28:42] houses of one million 1,200, where other people
[00:28:46] can access through credits,
[00:28:49] so the interesting thing about this is that public
[00:28:53] housing has grown, it is this one
[00:28:55] here.
[00:29:08] this is the Infonavit, Foviste and Konami
[00:29:12] program, and this is private
[00:29:14] social
[00:29:16] housing, that is, a real estate developer who
[00:29:20] starts building housing for the access of more
[00:29:33] During neoliberalism,
[00:29:36] the objective was that the state should not intervene in anything, everything was the market, the
[00:29:39] market, the market, the market,
[00:29:42] I remember when President López Obrador was head of
[00:29:46] government in the city, they insisted a lot that he close the city's
[00:29:50] asphalt plant, he didn't close it,
[00:29:53] but he decided
[00:29:56] to modernize it,
[00:29:58] and when he modernized it, well, it had to be closed for about 4
[00:30:01] months, 5 months while it was
[00:30:04] being modernized, when the
[00:30:07] asphalt cubic meter
[00:30:10] was closed, it shot up in
[00:30:13] price,
[00:30:17] why didn't it have this other part
[00:30:20] of a mechanism where there would be public production of
[00:30:24] asphalt, and it is not subsidized, eh, public
[00:30:28] production, it is at cost, but
[00:30:31] then you already have a... competition where it pulls you
[00:30:35] is happening now, by the state
[00:30:38] entering
[00:30:41] having agreements with private companies for the production of
[00:30:44] social housing
[00:30:47] at a low cost, but dignified,
[00:30:50] well, then it pulls the others so that
[00:30:54] they also build housing,
[00:30:58] so the model does work.