CCTV13 — broadcast
20260926 141500 UTC
211 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:35] 68 countries and regions worldwide.
[00:00:38] 1385 skilled craftsmen competed on the same stage
[00:00:42] .
[00:00:48] It's equivalent to connecting many independent devices together
[00:00:52] to form a smart factory. The number of competition events has now developed to 64,
[00:00:56] which come from society. After the AI regulatory period,
[00:02:16] hello, audience friends, welcome to open. First of all, I wish you a happy holiday.
[00:02:21] Our program today is a bit different from usual. Now I am in the studio of China Media Group Shanghai Headquarters. Today's Monday is because I have been in Shanghai
[00:03:10] . Let's take a look at the highlights of these days' competitions. This Wednesday, the 48th WorldSkills Competition officially
[00:03:14] entered the competition time. 1385 skilled
[00:03:17] craftsmen from 68 countries and regions around the world
[00:03:21] competed in 64 events . Unlike sports
[00:03:25] competitions that take turns, WorldSkills Competition is
[00:03:29] because
[00:04:15] top professional chefs, the taste of their dishes, side dishes, and decorations, must all be at a certain standard
[00:04:18] to be considered perfect works
[00:04:22] . At the cooking competition site,
[00:04:26] it is obvious that television still has regrets, because you cannot smell such a fragrance.
[00:05:00] They sat down and ate here, not just to taste the food
[00:05:04] . Although the audience does not participate in scoring, their interaction and communication with the service staff
[00:05:08] are part of the test questions
[00:05:11] .
[00:05:42] 25 years old, four days of competition, no awards ceremony in the middle, all
[00:05:46] results will be announced at the closing ceremony
[00:05:49] .
[00:05:53] The popularity of the bricklaying competition site is probably second only to the cooking competition.
[00:05:57] For the audience, this traditional event can more intuitively
[00:06:00] show their skill level. Many experienced bricklayers were surprised by
[00:06:04] the skill level of these young people under 22 years old
[00:06:08] . Bricklaying can also produce world champions, WorldSkills .
[00:06:24] In addition to the old faces like bricklaying, the WorldSkills Competition also featured new events such as
[00:06:27] drone systems and Industry 4.0.
[00:08:12] A group of young students from various vocational schools in Shanghai
[00:08:16] came to observe. Skills can change the world, and skills can
[00:08:20] illuminate the future. This is no longer a slogan on a trophy,
[00:08:23] but a life choice that every young person
[00:08:27] achieves through hard work
[00:08:28] .
[00:08:36] This week, love poured in from all over the country to a school
[00:08:40] in Cibazhen, Jiaxian County, Henan Province. Ruirui is an ordinary civilian in the police station. His two daughters mainly depend on him.
[00:10:03] 10 years ago, he came to the police station as a tourist and was simply explained by a tourist.
[00:12:25] belongs to young heroes. In this week's character review, the word "young"
[00:12:29] is even more prominent. Zhou Zhi started his journey for teenagers 20 years ago. He also
[00:12:33] wanted to leave, but the students' farewell made him unable to say no.
[00:12:37] So year after year, he stayed by the side of the young students. Thank
[00:12:41] him. And the 64-year-old sister Ming became popular. If you look closely,
[00:12:45] sister has always had a young heart. She is optimistic and also makes
[00:12:49] tourists feel happy. Now life will also get better.
[00:12:53] 日 子 也 会 变 得 更 好 了 。
[00:21:50] The young new stars are showing their skills to the world.
[00:22:19] So it's fair to say,
[00:24:20] In a cybersecurity training, the AI entity, originally restricted, bypassed the restrictions
[00:24:24] and infiltrated another company's system. During this process,
[00:24:28] it broke through isolation, deceived evaluators, and attempted
[00:24:32] to cover up its cheating behavior. Every step was without
[00:24:35] human instructions. The report's headline used a very serious statement:
[00:24:39] "Risk of loss of human control." This incident
[00:24:43] happened in the United States, but the questions it raised probably need to be answered by all countries
[00:24:47] together. This week's 81st United Nations General Assembly. After the AI regulatory period, the world's nations should handle it with regulatory assistance this week.
[00:25:02] After the AI regulatory period,
[00:25:07] uncontrolled artificial intelligence became the focus of discussion in many UN venues this week.
[00:25:13] At the 81st
[00:25:14] session of the United Nations General Assembly, Secretary-General Guterres pointed out that
[00:25:50] the discussion was very, very heated. A more prominent focus this year is the more specific
[00:25:54] requirement for humans to maintain control. There is a very important background, which is that some
[00:25:57] risks that were previously mainly discussed through deductions or scenarios
[00:26:01] are now.
[00:26:21] In a cybersecurity training, OpenAI's intelligent agent
[00:26:25] broke through its originally isolated operating environment, established communication,
[00:26:29] and deceived evaluators .
[00:27:42] The scary part of this incident is that the intelligent agent's series of transgressions were not initiated by any human commands; they were completely autonomous actions. Humans only gave it a
[00:27:46] goal, and to achieve that goal, it decided on its own to launch an
[00:27:50] invasion. The technology of this intelligent agent has been continuously improving. It
[00:27:54] can, based on the goal you give it,
[00:27:58] break down many other things that are beyond you.
[00:28:45] This is not the only autonomous invasion incident by an intelligent agent. This Wednesday, Australian Prime Minister Albanese attended the United Nations General Assembly and reported that in June this year, an OpenAI intelligent agent
[00:28:48] unauthorizedly accessed a medical insurance statistics portal website
[00:28:52] operated by the Australian government, and accessed public and non-public
[00:28:56] documents. And OpenAI did not inform the Australian public
[00:29:00] until September 10th .
[00:29:32] was suddenly attacked, and then the indoor traffic order was completely disrupted
[00:29:36] . This kind of risk may not appear immediately,
[00:29:40] but what we see now is that there is such a possibility. When it solves problems,
[00:29:44] if your computer stores solutions to related problems,
[00:29:48] it may invade your computer to
[00:29:52] explore. Even if it is stored in
[00:29:55] your mobile phone, the information in your personal computer,
[00:29:59] in fact, all can be accessed by the Internet.
[00:30:32] He warned that we are moving forward at high speed, but the visibility
[00:30:36] ahead is getting lower . So in your opinion, are we currently
[00:30:40] losing control of AI? At present, whether we are losing control of
[00:30:44] artificial intelligence still depends on how we
[00:30:47] prevent the risks of artificial intelligence. If we can better
[00:30:51] actively prevent the risks that have appeared,
[00:30:55] if we can more responsibly limit the scope
[00:30:59] of the potential impact of the risks that have already appeared.
[00:31:07] The development of AI is getting faster and faster, and the risks it brings are also escalating.
[00:31:10] Two years ago, AI only helped us answer questions
[00:31:14] .
[00:31:45] When the housekeeper starts to act on his own and the owner doesn't know what he has done,
[00:31:48] the risk here is the most critical part of governance. How should
[00:31:52] our supervision keep up? Danger
[00:31:56] is not in technology, danger is in technology without accountability,
[00:32:00] in having ability but no supervision, in having
[00:32:03] decision-making but no transparency. This was what
[00:32:07] UN Secretary-General Guterres stated at the opening of the UN General Assembly general debate
[00:32:11] on current artificial intelligence development.
[00:32:15] The multiple AI overstepping incidents that have occurred this year clearly expose
[00:32:19] significant loopholes in regulatory mechanisms. Currently, supervision
[00:32:23] is actually still insufficient. If
[00:32:27] an intelligent agent is locked in a sandbox to observe its behavior
[00:32:30] during such experiments, if its safeguards are sufficient, if its
[00:32:34] external regulatory environment is solid enough,
[00:32:38] in fact, such situations, I believe the vast majority
[00:32:42] should be avoided. However, from
[00:32:46] corporate self-discipline to the actual
[00:32:50] implementation platforms of government regulatory
[00:32:53] policies in countries where these things happen,
[00:32:57] there are actually some shortcomings. Therefore,
[00:33:00] it gives artificial intelligence systems such opportunities.
[00:33:04] Behind AI overstepping is that regulation has not kept up
[00:33:08] with the speed of technological development. As artificial intelligence gradually acquires the ability
[00:33:12] to make autonomous decisions, use tools, and even perform
[00:33:15] tasks from being a simple tool. The regulation of AI must
[00:33:19] shift from passive defense to proactive
[00:33:21] prevention
[00:33:24] is definitely not enough, because companies do not fully grasp
[00:33:27] the latest possible risks. In addition,
[00:33:31] I think what needs to be strengthened is third-party monitoring.
[00:33:35] Between government and enterprises, there should be such neutral
[00:33:39] institutions to help enterprises discover enterprises
[00:33:42] from a more balanced perspective and approach.
[00:34:28] Since its first release in 2024, this governance framework
[00:34:32] has been updated for the third consecutive year. The new framework
[00:34:36] pays more attention to the new risks brought by artificial intelligence,
[00:34:40] such as autonomous cyberattack threats, and there is also a special
[00:34:43] column on intelligent agent risks.
[00:35:22] For example, strengthening manual review, setting mandatory manual review links at critical decision points,
[00:35:26] preventing high-risk operations, providing intelligent agents with unique
[00:35:30] identity markers and corresponding identity credentials, assigning task permissions as needed,
[00:35:34] etc. Some analysts believe that framework 3.0
[00:35:38] takes process as the main thread, identity as the knowledge point, and full coverage
[00:35:41] as the key, establishing a systematic framework
[00:35:47] for intelligent agents. Why do we emphasize process? Because in the research and development of artificial intelligence, especially
[00:35:51] in the research and development of intelligent agents and their use,
[00:35:55] from design and development to use and deployment,
[00:35:58] until the intelligent agent is
[00:36:02] eliminated or the artificial intelligence service is eliminated. At any stage of our entire process,
[00:36:06] different forms of risks and challenges may arise.
[00:36:10] So why do we emphasize the full life cycle? Why do we emphasize
[00:36:14] the entire process? This is its importance. Every intelligent agent should
[00:36:17] have its own identity, so that we can prevent
[00:36:21] the potential risks of intelligent agents in advance. On the other
[00:36:25] hand, it is traceability and problem solving.
[00:37:03] As the first institutional norm to directly address the risks of intelligent agents,
[00:37:06] framework 3.0 has only taken the first step of a long journey.
[00:37:10] As intelligent agents evolve from single intelligent agents to multi-intelligent agents,
[00:37:14] how to keep AI always under effective supervision and human
[00:37:18] oversight has also become a problem that all countries in the world
[00:37:22] face together. If a country's government wants to control
[00:37:26] or govern artificial intelligence, it may need several systems. First, for example, it needs
[00:37:30] a hierarchical evaluation to determine the intensity of the evaluation
[00:37:33] based on the actual capabilities of the system and the deployed
[00:37:37] scenarios. Secondly, it is an independent audit. For example, for high-risk
[00:37:41] systems, external evaluators should be able to access some necessary
[00:37:45] information under confidential conditions, and avoid conflicts of interest with the evaluated
[00:37:48] enterprises that may affect judgment. And so on. The third is
[00:37:52] the reporting of major incidents, for example, accidents that have caused losses
[00:37:56] , or already.
[00:38:31] This means that safety in the field of AI is becoming more and more like cybersecurity
[00:38:35] and nuclear safety. If one company has an accident, a series of companies may
[00:38:39] be affected. If a country's regulation has loopholes, the risk
[00:38:42] may also affect other countries. In the face of AI risks, no
[00:38:46] country can stand alone, and no one can solve it behind closed doors.
[00:38:50] UN Secretary-General Guterres even equated uncontrolled artificial intelligence
[00:38:53] with the climate crisis, calling it a global existential threat.
[00:39:14] When Jeffrey Hinton came to China for the World AI Conference, he said that AI, which you now see as a very cute little animal, might turn into a big monster after a while, and I think it's very scary.
[00:39:25] I think everyone is now just considering
[00:39:48] What worries him more is that many people still only think about raising a tiger, but rarely think about
[00:39:52] how much hidden danger it will bring . In international relations,
[00:39:55] there is a security dilemma. These intelligent actions, why they would combine to attack a system, they don't quite understand. In fact, humanity has many, many problems.
[00:41:40] In terms of how to prevent the misuse of artificial intelligence,
[00:41:43] and its loss of control, there are indeed many problems to face.
[00:41:46] In terms of international cooperation, as major artificial intelligence
[00:41:50] countries, China and the United States, dialogue and cooperation are very important.
[00:41:54] This Thursday, the spokesperson of the Ministry of Commerce stated that under the China-US
[00:41:58] economic and trade consultation mechanism, China and the United States held their first
[00:42:02] dialogue on artificial intelligence. Placing the issue
[00:42:05] of artificial intelligence in the economic and trade field as a prominent
[00:42:09] issue is also a truly pragmatic attempt
[00:42:12] to promote communication between the two countries on
[00:42:16] artificial intelligence. In the context of economic and trade issues, risk prevention
[00:42:20] is a traditional issue. Therefore, it is possible
[00:42:24] to deeply integrate artificial intelligence risk prevention
[00:42:28] with economic development and cooperation risks.
[00:42:31] So I think this is also a very important consideration.
[00:42:35] We can also see that on the issue of artificial intelligence risk prevention,
[00:42:39] 个 议 题 ,
[00:43:40] to sit down and discuss how to better control this technology, and from a broader
[00:43:43] perspective, think about human development, and the safety
[00:43:47] of humanity's future. This week, the leaders of China and the United States
[00:43:51] reached a consensus to agree to establish
[00:43:55] a China-US artificial intelligence dialogue to exchange views on artificial intelligence-related
[00:43:59] risks and meetings. The next dialogue will be held
[00:44:03] in November this year. Both sides agreed to establish a communication
[00:44:06] channel for artificial intelligence incidents .
[00:44:09] The AI incident reminds us that if we don't set clear safety boundaries for AI's development, it could spiral out of control. Fortunately, this was just a test in a simulated environment. Ultimately, technology is neutral.
[00:44:40] How to ensure that technology and intelligence are used for good,
[00:44:44] and that artificial intelligence is always under human control, this
[00:44:47] steering wheel must be in our hands. All right, we'll talk about next week's
[00:44:51] matters next week. Happy holidays!