CCTV13 — broadcast
20261010 192100 UTC
132 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:01:30] The road transportation of dangerous goods is a high-risk industry. Therefore, the state
[00:01:34] has formulated strict standards to prevent major safety
[00:01:37] production accidents from happening at the source . However, the assessment team found
[00:01:41] that there were problems in some places, such as overloaded hazardous goods
[00:01:45] vehicles, falsified equipment inspection reports, and loopholes in the electronic waybill
[00:01:49] management system, which need to be taken seriously
[00:01:53] .
[00:01:55] Jingbian County Xingda Comprehensive Development Co., Ltd. is located in Shaanxi
[00:01:59] .
[00:02:30] How can this be so similar ? Look, why don't you
[00:02:34] fill it up deliberately every time ? Look, you're still
[00:02:37] 32% short. You bought too much and exceeded the limit
[00:02:40] .
[00:02:45] A utilization rate of 68.3% means that the oil tanker only loaded
[00:02:48] about one-third of the tank's crude oil. It makes sense to load less
[00:02:52] to avoid overloading, but wasting a large amount of transportation
[00:02:56] capacity for a long time is not in line with commercial logic.
[00:03:30] Its factory report states that the rated load is 14 tons
[00:03:34] , but the ticket shows that it pulled 22.14 tons
[00:03:37] , overloading by 58% . Subsequently, the assessment
[00:03:41] team checked the vehicles with tail numbers 6163,
[00:03:43] 6782, 7684
[00:03:46] , etc., and found that all of them were overloaded. The overload range
[00:03:50] varied from 42% to 58%
[00:03:53] .
[00:03:57] The weight exceeded by 53, it exceeded.
[00:04:18] After much effort, the reporter found a surveillance video taken by chance on June 18,
[00:04:22] the day of the inspection. The result showed that the two vehicles had
[00:04:26] the same license plate number, both 3943. One was
[00:05:04] We have been in business for 100 years
[00:05:05] , 16 years, do you know about this overdraft?
[00:05:15] I knew it from the first day . How do you explain this
[00:05:18] ? Give this to me immediately. Experts
[00:05:22] say that hazardous goods vehicles are not ordinary trucks. Once overloaded, the consequences are
[00:05:26] much more serious, easily leading to major safety accidents
[00:05:29] . Once the contents inside leak
[00:05:33] , causing combustion and explosion , and there may even be some other
[00:05:37] highly toxic substances, the social harm is very great. Therefore, it is
[00:05:40] the state
[00:05:59] . In early September, the Central Safety Production Assessment and Inspection Team returned to Jingbian County for further investigation. The investigation found that the main reason was that
[00:06:03] four links had failed layer by layer . Let's take the tank truck with the license
[00:06:06] plate number 3943 as an example to see how it
[00:06:10] passed these four tests. First, the source loading
[00:06:14] and unloading link failed. When this vehicle went to the oil
[00:06:18] production station to load oil, the oil production station should have reviewed
[00:06:21] its rated load, which was 14 tons. However, it actually loaded
[00:06:25] 22 tons for it. This obviously violated Article 29
[00:06:29] of the Measures for the Safety Management of Road Transportation of Dangerous Goods. The loaded
[00:06:33] goods shall not exceed the rated load quality of the transport
[00:06:36] vehicle. Obviously, the oil production station did not perform its relevant duties
[00:06:40] . The second hurdle is the transport enterprise
[00:07:12] . It clearly carried 22 tons of goods , but in order to obtain an electronic waybill
[00:07:16] , it only filled in 12 tons . In this regard, Xingda
[00:07:19] Company obviously lacked management and failed to review it.
[00:07:23] In this way, the tank truck with the number 3943 passed the second hurdle
[00:07:27] and came to the third hurdle, the electronic waybill system
[00:07:30] . It mainly reflects the information of
[00:07:33] our consignor and consignee, the information of the goods transported,
[00:07:37] and the information of the transportation route
[00:07:40] .
[00:08:29] In some places in our country, in order to plug this loophole, local regulations have been passed to mandate that hazardous
[00:08:33] goods loading and unloading enterprises connect their electronic ground scales to the supervision
[00:08:37] platform, and automatically compare the weight with the electronic waybill declaration
[00:08:41] to form a closed-loop early warning . However, Shaanxi
[00:08:44] lacks this critical link. Finally, let's look at the fourth hurdle, road
[00:08:48] inspection. Can the traffic control department responsible for road
[00:08:51] inspection detect the overload ? The answer is very difficult
[00:08:55] . First, there are many hazardous goods vehicles. As of the end of
[00:08:58] 2025, Shaanxi Province had nearly 25,000 hazardous goods vehicles
[00:09:02] registered for road transportation, and Jingbian alone had
[00:09:06] more than 2,000 vehicles. Secondly, the traffic control department only
[00:09:09] conducts random checks on suspicious vehicles.
[00:10:13] In addition to the overload of hazardous goods transportation, this time the Central
[00:10:16] Safety Production Assessment and Inspection Team also found that the problem of falsified
[00:10:20] inspection reports for hazardous goods vehicles is shocking
[00:10:23] . According to regulations
[00:10:35] , this is an important measure to ensure the safety of vehicles on the road. The inspection of hazardous goods vehicles is much stricter than that of ordinary
[00:10:39] trucks. There are dozens of inspection items, and the technical
[00:10:43] level of the vehicle must reach level one
[00:10:47] before it can operate. In early April this year, when the inspection team went to
[00:10:50] Guizhou Fengmao Logistics Co., Ltd. for inspection, it found that the company
[00:10:54] provided two
[00:11:55] are all true, but there was actually no inspection. Therefore, from the report
[00:11:59] , his fraud cannot be detected . The Office of the State Council's Safety
[00:12:03] Committee transferred this issue to the Fujian Provincial People's Government for
[00:12:07] further investigation. On May 6 , the Fujian Provincial Market Supervision
[00:12:11] and Administration Department filed a case
[00:12:14] against Fujian Suoshengyuan Testing Technology Services Co., Ltd.,
[00:12:18] which provides tank inspection and testing services, and found
[00:12:22] 91 problematic inspection reports. We found
[00:12:45] that these 91 fake reports ended up in the hands of Guizhou Fengmao Logistics ? The investigation found that on January 9
[00:12:49] , 2025, Fujian Suoshengyuan Testing Technology Services Co., Ltd.
[00:12:53] collaborated with Zhang, who was not qualified
[00:13:01] , to issue inspection reports and pay a certain
[00:13:05] fee. The periodic inspection business of the tank body of Guizhou
[00:13:09] Fengmao Logistics was completed by Zhang in cooperation with Suoshengyuan
[00:13:13] . During the period from January 25 to April
[00:13:17] 26, the person involved did not send
[00:13:20] personnel to the site, did not conduct on-site inspections, and directly
[00:13:24] received
[00:13:28] the data provided for 74 hazardous goods transport
[00:13:31] vehicles of Guizhou Fengmao Logistics , providing 91
[00:13:35] periodic inspection reports . Experts said that tank
[00:13:38] trucks carrying hazardous goods that are on the road for a long
[00:13:42] time with fake reports are extremely dangerous. First of all, the
[00:13:45] unqualified report cannot guarantee that the tank body
[00:13:49] meets the quantity
[00:13:51] requirements.
[00:13:53] This leads to major accidents, especially when flammable and explosive materials
[00:13:57] are not handled in time. Finally, the Fujian
[00:14:01] market supervision department determined that
[00:14:04] it not only constituted illegal acts of issuing false inspection reports
[00:14:08] for hazardous goods vehicles, but also the illegal amount was suspected of
[00:14:11] violating criminal law . According to the investigation
[00:14:15] , the illegal proceeds totaled 151,200 yuan
[00:14:18] . It has been suspected of constituting the crime of providing false
[00:14:22] documents. So on June 15 , 26, our bureau
[00:14:33] will speak. In addition to Guizhou and Fujian , the inspection team also found
[00:14:36] false inspection reports in Shandong, Shaanxi, Ningxia, Heilongjiang and
[00:14:40] other places, which deserves high attention. This should
[00:14:44] attract high attention from our relevant state departments, because the number of
[00:14:48] criminal and civil cases is still increasing. So first of all,
[00:14:52] policies may need to be further implemented.
[00:15:27] All are touching the red line of public safety. Any
[00:15:31] failure in any link of hazardous goods transportation may lead to
[00:15:34] serious accidents. In response to all types of safety
[00:15:40] risks identified, relevant departments have requested all localities to strictly investigate and punish, urge to make up for supervisory shortcomings, and implement safety responsibilities of all parties to firmly守住 the bottom
[00:15:44] line of safety production for hazardous goods transportation
[00:15:47] . Thank you for watching today's Focus Interview. Goodbye
[00:16:29] . A deep dive into global military hot spots. Hello everyone
[00:16:33] , welcome to this issue of Military Time. I'm Lao Chunyan. In this
[00:16:37] issue, we have Professor Meng.