CCTV13 — broadcast
20261105 213400 UTC
167 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:37] Good afternoon, everyone. This is CCTV News Channel. Welcome to Rule of Law Online.
[00:00:41] Have you heard of "dao shou dao"? This is a dark practice in second-hand
[00:00:45] transactions. It means once the goods change hands, the buyer
[00:00:48] finds fault, bargains, and doesn't pay the agreed price.
[00:00:52] Originally, this was at most a troublesome transaction dispute. But
[00:00:56] now it has been used by some illegal elements to commit actual fraud.
[00:01:30] Due to concerns about unnecessary disputes, Mr. Li thoroughly described the phone's
[00:01:34] defects with photos on a second-hand platform and informed the buyer in advance.
[00:01:38] The other party also indicated acceptance. Finally, Mr. Li even lent the
[00:01:42] phone to an official testing center and obtained a detailed test
[00:01:45] report. What was unexpected was that a week later, after receiving the phone,
[00:01:49] the buyer still sent a message, pointing out that photos taken by the phone had spots,
[00:01:53] hoping for a further discount. Considering the time cost and the shipping
[00:01:56] fee for returns, Mr. Li had no choice but to accept a 300 yuan deduction.
[00:02:01] The reporter searched "dao shou dao" online and found that many people who had sold second-hand goods
[00:02:05] had similar experiences. In June this year, a seller listed
[00:02:08] a phone on Xianyu. The buyer bought it, and after receiving it, said
[00:02:12] they found problems and demanded a 200 yuan discount. Other sellers
[00:02:16] posted chat records where the buyer, after receiving the goods, found fault, and in the unboxing video
[00:02:20] sent, the item mysteriously had scratches, thus demanding another
[00:02:23] few hundred yuan
[00:02:24] off.
[00:03:19] So, are these "dao shou dao" incidents just scattered bargaining disputes, or are they organized, premeditated fraud? In March this year, the Fengtai District People's Court in Beijing ruled on a second-hand product "dao shou dao" fraud case, revealing the complete
[00:03:23] escape route
[00:03:26] of this type of scam.
[00:04:00] So, how do they commit fraud? Fraud step
[00:04:04] one: bypass inspection. General second-hand trading
[00:04:07] platforms all have official inspection channels. For items like second-hand
[00:04:11] luxury bags, after official inspection, the payment is settled at the agreed
[00:04:15] price, and no one can tamper with it. Therefore, Jin and others
[00:04:19] tried every means to make the seller forgo inspection. First,
[00:04:23] the first step is to create conditions. On second-hand luxury
[00:04:26] goods trading platforms, they select these second-hand luxury bags. Then,
[00:04:30] they make the seller not use the official inspection channel, but instead directly
[00:04:34] mail the product to their company. Fraud step two: manufacturing
[00:04:38] defects. The second step is that this gang colludes
[00:04:41] with the courier. When the goods have actually been received, the courier
[00:04:45] system still shows an unsigned status. After getting the bag, they
[00:04:49] start manufacturing defects. For example, using some soft glue or
[00:04:53] paint to create some artificial defects on the bag, making the bag
[00:04:56] appear to have some oxidation or wear
[00:05:00] or cracks, and other such defects.
[00:05:04] They even wear courier uniforms to fake an unboxing
[00:05:08] video, in order to claim that the bag itself
[00:05:11] has defects.
[00:05:19] Evidence shows that the courier who received goods for this company received a 4,000 yuan bonus from the company each month. Receipt and rejection were uniformly notified by buyers in the company's courier information group. Tools used for manufacturing were also uniformly procured
[00:05:23] and reimbursed by the company. Fraud step three:
[00:05:27] fake price reduction. This step is also the key step in "dao shou dao."
[00:05:31] The defendants, Jin and others, sent photos of fake defects and unboxing
[00:05:34] videos to the seller, demanding a price reduction. They sent these
[00:05:38] to the seller.
[00:05:42] 。
[00:06:12] After a few days, what state it was in when it came back, the seller found it hard to explain. In multiple
[00:06:16] cases confirmed by the court, the victims were ultimately forced to choose
[00:06:20] to sell at a reduced price. In this case, we determined
[00:06:23] that the defendants manufactured false
[00:06:25] defects.
[00:06:30] Firstly, the defendants had the subjective intention of illegally possessing the victim's funds.
[00:06:33] Secondly, the defendants carried out acts of fabricating facts.
[00:06:37] Thirdly, the defendants' actions reached the threshold
[00:06:41] for fraud.
[00:06:43] The court's trial found that the defendants Jin and two others, by fabricating defects
[00:06:47] and then bargaining, defrauded Ms. Peng, Ms. Li, and
[00:06:51] many other victims of a total of over 120,000 yuan. After the incident,
[00:06:55] Jin returned 100,000 yuan. On March 13 this year, the Beijing
[00:06:58] Fengtai District People's Court made a judgment on these cases. Jin and the other
[00:07:02] three defendants were convicted of fraud and sentenced to prison terms ranging
[00:07:06] from four years and three months to one year, and fined.
[00:07:10] The courier who received goods for this company was convicted of fraud
[00:07:14] and sentenced to two years in prison and fined 20,000 yuan.
[00:07:17] The law has made a clear decision on "dao shou dao" behavior. So, what legal responsibilities
[00:07:21] should platforms bear for such behavior? For
[00:07:25] sellers who are not very knowledgeable and only occasionally sell their
[00:07:29] idle items, how should they prevent such traps? How should these
[00:07:32] chaotic phenomena on second-hand platforms
[00:07:36] be governed?
[00:07:40] Article 1197 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China
[00:07:42] stipulates that network service providers who know or
[00:07:46] should know that network users are using their network services to infringe
[00:07:50] on the civil rights and interests of others, and fail to take necessary measures,
[00:07:54] shall bear joint and several liability with such network users.
[00:07:57] The reporter found that in the chat screenshots posted by
[00:08:01] some parties who experienced "dao shou dao", platform system prompts can be seen,
[00:08:05] for example, "This buyer's recent dispute rate is far higher than
[00:08:09] the platform average," "This buyer's refund rate is far higher than the platform average," etc. Legal experts...
[00:08:39] In addition to punishing accounts that violate rules, some second-hand trading platforms have already provided
[00:08:43] inspection services in transactions.
[00:08:44] 。
[00:08:49] In a transaction, sellers can choose to send second-hand items to a platform-designated appraisal agency for paid inspection. The agency will check
[00:08:52] for authenticity, take detailed photos, and issue a report. Buyers review the
[00:08:56] report before deciding whether to purchase. Legal experts believe this can indeed
[00:09:00] reduce "dao shou dao" to a certain extent. So, with the platform
[00:09:04] acting as a third party, mediating between two parties, providing an appraisal, and acting as a bottom-line
[00:09:08] credit guarantee, I think this is a very good idea. On the one hand,
[00:09:12] it ensures that consumers buy genuine items. On the other hand, it also ensures that businesses
[00:09:16] are not deceived by such "dao shou dao" behaviors,
[00:09:19] defrauded, or extorted. To protect the legitimate rights
[00:09:23] and interests of both parties in second-hand transactions, legal experts believe that in addition to providing third-party inspection
[00:09:27] services, platforms should also improve the complaint and reporting mechanisms.
[00:09:30] As for sellers and buyers on second-hand trading platforms,
[00:09:34] experts particularly advise not to conduct private transactions off-platform.
[00:09:38] For buyers who propose courier pickup, adding WeChat
[00:09:42] directly...
[00:09:48] These are often precursors to "dao shou dao" fraud traps. First, choose a regular trading platform, because a regular trading platform
[00:09:52] verifies the seller's identity. When trading, the most important thing is
[00:09:56] to try not to conduct transactions off the platform,
[00:10:00] do not conduct private transactions, and try to choose
[00:10:04] the platform's official appraisal service. Finally, it is important to keep evidence
[00:10:08] throughout the entire process. If a dispute occurs, we can...
[00:10:25] is not a simple price dispute, but may constitute fraud.
[00:10:28] From bypassing official inspection, fabricating product defects
[00:10:32] to using fake videos to lower prices, the criminal gang links all steps,
[00:10:36] turning second-hand transactions into a tool for their own illegal gains.
[00:10:40] Platforms cannot just be facilitators of transactions; they must also be good
[00:10:44] gatekeepers of risks. For accounts with instant replies, high
[00:10:47] refund rates, deliberate bypassing of inspection, and off-platform transactions,
[00:10:51] unusual accounts should not just be met with pop-up prompts.
[00:11:55] The Judicial Identification Science Research Institute, Road Traffic Accident Identification Research
[00:11:59] Department, identification experts showed reporters several clips of public
[00:12:02] surveillance video and a dashcam recording of a traffic accident that occurred
[00:12:06] in Shanghai.
[00:12:25] After the car lost control, it hit the bus next to it. Finally, the
[00:12:29] vehicle hit the guardrail and stopped. After the accident occurred,
[00:12:32] the driver of the new energy car, which caused multi-vehicle damage due to rear-end collision,
[00:12:36] raised an objection, arguing that during the accident,
[00:12:40] they had already stepped on the brake pedal, but the vehicle could not
[00:12:44] decelerate and brake. It was a vehicle malfunction, brake failure that caused
[00:12:48] this accident. To ascertain the cause of the accident, the public security traffic management department
[00:12:52] commissioned the Judicial Identification Science Research Institute to examine the vehicle.
[00:14:55] opinion, it was concluded that the service brake system and
[00:14:59] steering system of the subject vehicle were both functional. It can be ruled out
[00:15:02] that the accident was caused by a sudden mechanical failure of the service brake system
[00:15:06] or steering system. The subject vehicle's brake pedal position
[00:15:10] was 0% during all three collisions. During the first
[00:15:14] two collisions, the accelerator pedal position was
[00:15:17] 100%. The original meaning is that the driver said the vehicle
[00:15:21] was out of control, which led to this accident.
[00:16:44] According to GB 39732020
[00:16:47] national standard, single collision, front and rear vehicle deployment, etc.
[00:16:57] The system can record at least three events,
[00:17:01] and the EDR itself must ensure that it can still complete data recording after the rear vehicle bows.
[00:18:07] In solving cases, blind spots in surveillance often pose difficulties for investigative
[00:18:11] work. Without direct footage, how to determine
[00:18:14] whether a vehicle and a pedestrian had a collision? Traffic
[00:18:18] accident trace identification relies on meticulous examination of micro-evidence
[00:18:22] and trace characteristics. To reconstruct the truth of the accident
[00:18:26] from subtle details.
[00:18:28] 。
[00:18:30] At the Judicial Identification Science Research Institute, Road Traffic Accident Identification
[00:18:34] Research Department, identification experts introduced a case. A traffic accident
[00:18:38] occurred in Zongyang County, Anhui. In the early morning of December 2024,
[00:18:42] a man was found unconscious by the roadside by passers-by, who reported it to the police.
[00:18:45] Police rushed to the scene to conduct on-site investigation
[00:18:49] and screening. They suspected the man was hit by a vehicle.
[00:18:53] Through video tracking, they identified an electric tricycle
[00:18:57] that entered the incident section during the suspicious time frame. After investigation, the public security
[00:19:01] traffic management department determined that the driver of the electric tricycle
[00:19:04] identified in the public surveillance video, and these protruding parts of the iron wire are more likely to come into contact with clothing. This is a key area found. Combining this with the injury location on the back, the investigator used a magnifying glass to find a length on the edge of a protruding part of the electric tricycle at a height of 90 to 100 meters.
[00:22:54] to compensate these victims is also a way to uphold the law. Alright,
[00:22:57] thank you for watching today's Rule of Law Online. For more news and information, please follow
[00:23:01] CCTV News client. For more mobile videos, please download
[00:23:04] CCTV Video.
[00:26:39] Zhao Wen Tian Xia, starting a new day. Good morning, viewers.
[00:26:42] Good morning, everyone. This is CCTV Channel and New Channel broadcasting the morning news program Wen Tian Xia. Welcome to watch.
[00:26:50] Today is November 6,
[00:26:51] 2026, Friday. It is now 6:00 AM Beijing time. Let's see the report.
[00:26:58] Yesterday, the