CCTV1 — broadcast
20261010 113800 UTC
126 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:24] At this moment, this hot spot
[00:00:29] OPPO, etc.
[00:01:48] Speak with facts.
[00:01:50] ,
[00:01:53] Correct mistakes and discuss.
[00:01:54] 。
[00:01:57] Hello, audience friends, welcome to watch.
[00:02:02] Since the official launch of the central safety production assessment and inspection team's 2nd and 3rd quarter unannounced visits
[00:02:06] , the intensity has been greater and the requirements stricter than ever before . For the first time, a special inspection of supervision and law enforcement
[00:02:09] problems was carried out .
[00:02:13] Road transportation of dangerous goods is a very high-risk industry
[00:02:16] . Therefore, the state has formulated strict regulations and standards. This is to prevent
[00:02:20] major and serious safety production accidents from the source.
[00:02:24] However, the assessment and inspection team found in some places that there were
[00:02:28] overloaded dangerous goods vehicles. Fake inspection reports, loopholes in the electronic waybill management system
[00:02:32] , and other problems need to be taken seriously
[00:02:35] .
[00:02:39] Jingbian County Xingda Comprehensive Development Co., Ltd. is located in Linshi City, Shanxi Province
[00:02:42] . It is a company that mainly transports crude oil
[00:02:46] and has more than 60 tank trucks . In mid-June,
[00:02:50] when the reporter followed the central safety production assessment and inspection team here
[00:02:54] , they initially found no problems . However, after logging into the backend electronic
[00:02:58] waybill system,
[00:05:00] after many efforts, the reporter found a surveillance video
[00:05:04] accidentally taken on June 18th , the day of the inspection. It was found
[00:05:08] that the two tank trucks had the same license plate number , both 3943.
[00:05:12] One was running on the road and the other was being inspected
[00:05:16] . However, the shapes of these two tanks , the length of the reflective strips
[00:05:20] , and the position of the markings were all different. Obviously, these
[00:05:24] were not the same tank at all . Whether this constitutes illegal replacement
[00:05:27] of the tank needs further investigation by relevant departments
[00:05:31] . How many tons do you ship each month
[00:05:34] ?
[00:05:41] Where are you from?
[00:06:42] A deeper investigation found that the main reason was
[00:06:46] that four links failed layer by layer . We will still take
[00:06:49] this tank truck with license plate number 3943 as an example to see how it
[00:06:53] passed these four hurdles . First, the source filling
[00:06:57] link, the provincial review failed . When this truck went to the oil collection station
[00:07:01] to load oil, the oil collection station should have checked its rated load
[00:07:04] , which is 14 tons . But in fact,
[00:07:08] it was loaded with 22 tons . This obviously violates the provisions
[00:07:12] of Article 29 of the Administrative Measures for Road Transportation Safety of Dangerous Goods
[00:07:15] . The loaded goods shall not exceed the rated load
[00:07:19] of the transport vehicle. Obviously, the oil collection station did not fulfill its relevant
[00:07:23] duties. The second hurdle, the transport enterprise did not fill in the
[00:07:27] waybill truthfully. In our country , dangerous goods must have a paper
[00:07:31] or electronic waybill before they can be transported on the road. Strictly
[00:07:34] implement the system of one vehicle, one trip, one waybill. The waybill
[00:07:38] for this vehicle with license plate number 3943 is issued by the carrier, which is
[00:08:12] the electronic waybill system . It can mainly
[00:08:15] reflect the information of our consignor, carrier, and
[00:08:19] vehicle owner
[00:08:20] .
[00:08:23] Including the information of the transport route, including the risk display of the entire vehicle
[00:08:27] during operation . The state promotes
[00:08:31] the construction of electronic waybill systems in various places , the purpose of which is to conduct full-chain
[00:08:35] dynamic supervision of dangerous goods road transportation. However, the Shanxi
[00:08:39] electronic waybill system did not connect with the source of the oil collection station.
[00:09:12] In order to plug this loophole, it has been mandated by local regulations
[00:09:16] that electronic ground scales of dangerous goods loading and unloading enterprises be connected to the supervision platform
[00:09:20] , and automatically compared with the weight reported in the electronic waybill, forming
[00:09:24] a closed loop. However, Shanxi is precisely missing this crucial link
[00:09:27] . Finally, let's look at the fourth aspect, roadside
[00:09:31] inspection. Can the traffic management department responsible for
[00:09:35] roadside inspection discover its overloading ? The answer is very difficult
[00:09:38] . First, there are many dangerous goods vehicles . As of 2025,
[00:10:56] In addition to the overloading of dangerous goods transportation , this central safety production assessment
[00:11:00] and inspection team also found shocking problems of fraudulent dangerous goods
[00:11:04] vehicle inspection reports . According to regulations,
[00:11:07] the body of dangerous goods vehicles must undergo an annual inspection, and the tank must undergo
[00:11:11] a regular inspection every two years. The inspection is completed by a professional organization
[00:11:14] and an inspection report is issued. This is an important measure to ensure the safe operation of vehicles
[00:11:18] . Dangerous goods vehicle inspection is much stricter
[00:11:22] than ordinary trucks. The inspection items amount to
[00:11:55] The person in charge of the enterprise said he didn't know clearly
[00:11:59] . Later, we measured the ghost level through the courtyard
[00:12:02] . From January to April this year , the enterprise had not
[00:12:06] been to the nearby area. This kind of enterprise's person in charge,
[00:12:10] the main person in charge, said that what he mentioned was
[00:12:14] a bought report, which means no inspection . On the day of the inspection
[00:12:17] , the Guizhou Provincial Department of Transportation filed a case for investigation against Fengmao Logistics
[00:12:21] based on the clues provided by the assessment and inspection team . The investigation found that
[00:12:25] the 84 inspection reports submitted by Fengmao Logistics
[00:12:28] had not undergone any actual inspection, but the reports issued
[00:12:32] were indistinguishable from genuine ones . The QR code
[00:12:36] and its seal content were all authentic
[00:12:40] , but there was no actual inspection . Therefore, from the report,
[00:12:43] its falsity could not be detected . The Office of the State Council Safety Committee
[00:12:47] transferred this issue to the Fujian Provincial People's Government for further investigation
[00:12:51] . On May 6th, the Fujian Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Department
[00:12:55] conducted an investigation against Fujian Shengyuan Testing Technology Service Co., Ltd.
[00:12:59] , which provides tank inspection and testing services
[00:13:02] .
[00:13:05] A total of 91 problematic inspection reports were found. We found three points in our investigation. Its
[00:13:09] testing personnel did not actually arrive at the scene for actual inspection
[00:13:13] . Second, the inspection equipment required for the inspection items
[00:13:17] was not used . The third is that its
[00:13:21] original inspection records were fabricated and forged afterwards
[00:13:24] . So how did these 91 false reports
[00:13:28] end up in the hands of Guizhou Fengmao Logistics ? The investigation found
[00:13:31] that on January 9, 2025 , Fujian Lushengyuan Testing Technology
[00:13:35] Service Co., Ltd. signed an authorized power of attorney with an unqualified
[00:13:39] external person, Zhang Mou . Zhang Mou helped Shengyuan
[00:13:43] solicit tank truck business, and Shengyuan issued inspection reports for Zhang Mou
[00:13:47] and paid a certain fee. The regular inspection
[00:13:51] business for the tanks of Guizhou Fengmao Logistics was completed by Zhang Mou
[00:13:55] in cooperation with Lushengyuan . From January
[00:13:59] 25th to April 26th, during the period
[00:14:02] , the city did not send personnel to the scene and did not conduct on-site
[00:14:06] inspections, directly receiving the data provided
[00:14:10] by Zhang Mou for the 74 dangerous goods transport vehicles
[00:14:14] of Guizhou Fengmao Logistics , providing 91
[00:14:18] regular inspection reports . Experts stated that
[00:14:21] tank trucks carrying dangerous goods that have long relied on false reports
[00:15:16] In addition to Guizhou and Fujian, the assessment and inspection team also found
[00:15:20] false inspection reports issued in Shandong, Shanxi , Ningxia, Heilongjiang and other
[00:15:24] places
[00:16:07] whether it's a testing agency issuing false inspection reports, both are touching
[00:16:11] the red line of public safety . Any
[00:16:15] failure in any link of dangerous goods transportation can lead to serious accidents
[00:16:18] . In response to the various safety hazards identified, relevant departments have already
[00:16:22] demanded that all regions strictly investigate and punish , urge the rectification of regulatory shortcomings
[00:16:25] , consolidate the safety responsibilities of all parties , and firmly adhere to the bottom line of safe production
[00:16:29] for dangerous goods transportation . Thank you for watching today's Focus Interview
[00:16:33] . Goodbye .