CRONICA — broadcast
20261010 200000 UTC
392 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] of a policeman, I want to make that clear, I want to tell the
[00:00:03] doctor, the complaint was for a trigger-happy homicide,
[00:00:07] and I at no time considered that the policeman acted as
[00:00:10] trigger-happy, far from that, what we talked about was the
[00:00:14] excess because the quantity of shots, how he shot at
[00:00:17] the person, I have everything proven in the case, doctor,
[00:00:20] unfortunately, that position,
[00:00:24] the criterion that you have and Dr. Soto who is here present was the one who
[00:00:28] was acting as Chocobar's defender. And he could see the way and what I
[00:00:32] presented and the way I did it, undoubtedly I cannot
[00:00:35] avoid it when all parties, including, consider what
[00:00:39] I consider was an excess. What is being
[00:00:43] judged here, based on a position that at no time is against the
[00:00:47] police, is manifesting in a concrete case what
[00:00:50] this public ministry requested because it understood that it was what
[00:00:53] was appropriate. Undoubtedly there was an excess and I cannot
[00:00:57] help but point it out in the face of the practically
[00:01:01] accusation I receive at this
[00:01:03] tears, they decided to stay in moment, which seems completely, excuse me, unprecedented to my
[00:01:06] 50-year career as prosecutor, and I can assure you that you
[00:01:09] can observe from the different positions I held that I always
[00:01:13] did it by studying the case.
[00:01:16] So when we vote for a prosecutor for minors, we have to know what her
[00:01:20] actions have been in concrete cases of public
[00:01:24] knowledge, like the Chocobar case, who
[00:01:27] was unjustly condemned, when he had
[00:01:31] saved a person's life. What I also say is that he didn't
[00:01:35] save them because you save when you hand over the camera and leave,
[00:01:38] he didn't save them, he didn't shoot when he's not... a technical
[00:01:41] detail because he didn't save him, what he tried to do was stop a person
[00:01:45] by shooting at them, that's all I have to
[00:01:48] what, you know what I gave, everything point out, because at no point did he save the victim, the victim was already
[00:01:51] lying down, already on the ground when he passed by
[00:01:54] there. A
[00:01:57] prosecutor with authority in front of...
[00:02:01] that Patricia is in the eye of the storm between whether she's friends or
[00:02:05] fighting with Mil, they're not
[00:02:07] most known worldwide, right? One of friends, I think they're friends, well they were in the quinta de
[00:02:10] Oliva together. Uh, I think Patricia has more desire to go
[00:02:14] her own way but well she understands that there's a movement, yes but she tried many times
[00:02:17] Patricia but it doesn't fit or it fits where there's a place here they're wrong
[00:02:21] in both aspects I think the prosecutor also partly
[00:02:24] has specific details she
[00:02:28] shot a person who was escaping, yes. who had stabbed, we are talking about the
[00:02:32] Chocobar case, Chocobar, that
[00:02:35] the medical board were partially criminal had stabbed a tourist, a foreign tourist, several
[00:02:38] times to rob him and in that she also didn't explain
[00:02:41] that, so you see that she didn't explain it well that we are having cuts
[00:02:45] guys out there. For me the error is, for me the error
[00:02:49] is above because in a democratic system it
[00:02:52] discuss it, it was within is characterized by the three
[00:02:55] compare himself, I don't know, everyone compares themselves to absolutely independent powers, executive power,
[00:02:58] judicial power and legislative power.
[00:03:08] The prosecutor, let's see, you have to understand this very technical, because legitimate
[00:03:11] defense is given, it is also given by the degree of
[00:03:14] proportionality, proportionality goes against
[00:03:17] what is legitimate defense, it is legitimate defense, he acted in
[00:03:21] good faith, he acted in the exercise of a function,
[00:03:26] And Fernando Burlando is the lawyer for yes, now we are looking at proportionality, based on that, it ends. He was sentenced
[00:03:31] important, what to 2 years for Chocobar, so what is the prosecutor seeing? The truth is
[00:03:34] she sees only one, one parameter, but in
[00:03:38] criminal matters, unfortunately, a prosecutor, you may be 50
[00:03:42] years old, but the truth is you seem like an
[00:03:44] that, I'm going to take away listening to ass because the exante, the
[00:03:46] judicial power does not have to be accountable to the legislative
[00:03:49] or
[00:03:51] executive power.
[00:03:54] his house and let him sit in an
[00:03:56] independent court.
[00:04:00] explanation proportionality, that's what
[00:04:03] that refers to, proportionality with the possibilities of
[00:04:07] legitimate defense, now there is a criminal act, one was
[00:04:11] stabbed many times and
[00:04:14] of them, what the doctor says ended up seriously injured, but who do you give explanations to, who are you giving
[00:04:16] explanations to, the legislative power, the executive power, to
[00:04:19] whom, why, if it's an independent power, the judicial
[00:04:23] power, that's what democracy is based on, well, but why did she sit down, she's
[00:04:27] the one who went, did someone force her? So
[00:04:31] it has to
[00:04:32] He compared himself all the time, no, what
[00:04:44] be independent, it's the basis of our democratic system, unless
[00:04:48] the prosecutor wants a seat, let's see, from a
[00:04:51] prosecutor she has to go to the chamber prosecutor and with this she's seeking media attention
[00:04:55] which could be because many use the media to climb, we can
[00:04:59] make the... the honor of saying the phrase within the
[00:05:02] law everything and outside the law
[00:05:05] nothing, I mean, I mean, we can also
[00:05:08] move
[00:05:11] reached a position, one is president of along that edge yes. Yes, but if there's a case, there's a judicial
[00:05:15] case that had first instance, had
[00:05:18] appeals, there's a judicial system that has up to the supreme
[00:05:21] court, what does a legislative or
[00:05:25] executive power have to do with interfering, they are three different powers,
[00:05:28] and why do we see and why do we see this picture, why does it happen, because she
[00:05:32] demands it and why does the prosecutor give
[00:05:36] explanations, if a ruling was bad, but within
[00:05:39] each power when we say. dangerous
[00:05:42] for a democratic system, that's what I think, well you
[00:05:45] know, let's make a point in this tape and we're going to move
[00:05:49] on to another one that has to do with politics, with the show and the spectacle too,
[00:05:53] you know, we all know what happened with Messi who
[00:05:56] said goodbye in that game eh on
[00:05:59] Tuesday and what Javier Miley did, what Javier
[00:06:02] Miley did, he had the audacity to
[00:06:04] compare himself to the number one in the
[00:06:08] world, to Lionel Messi, for me, for me
[00:06:11] it's a...
[00:06:42] my law that compared himself to Lionel Messi, my God this is going to
[00:06:46] be for everything and more, let's see when you come from
[00:06:49] sports, we are not so good when we win nor so bad when
[00:06:53] we lose, because in reality, let's say the day you won and you believed it, the next day they
[00:06:57] filled your basket, so you know
[00:07:01] I had to train for to get used to
[00:07:04] finding it inside, you know how ugly it is and yet you put up with it and
[00:07:08] you keep going, so life is not to have
[00:07:10] failures, life is to keep going even though you have
[00:07:14] failures, so get up and keep going, well, so, it goes wrong and
[00:07:18] well, you'll try another way, and if there's no other way, let's say
[00:07:21] you'll include the restriction and you'll take a path that has
[00:08:03] compare himself, guys, to
[00:08:07] whoever they want, but comparisons also have that hateful
[00:08:11] thing, look. I think that always I talk about respect and
[00:08:15] I want to say something with respect, for me Messi and Mil have
[00:08:18] nothing to do with all the things you have to go through to
[00:08:22] get there, he compares himself in that but he
[00:08:25] didn't go through
[00:08:28] a quarter of everything he went through in so many years because he doesn't have the
[00:08:31] time.
[00:08:35] the proportional
[00:08:39] that Messi's career, his health situation when he was...
[00:08:42] everything was against Messi to become the number one figure,
[00:08:46] he is basing the
[00:08:49] proportionality
[00:08:53] and why not, because it's not
[00:08:56] what he said, the comparison in terms of his
[00:08:59] talking about the proportion, let's see,
[00:09:03] if he from the age of 5 that he plays soccer until he's 39 today,
[00:09:07] how many goals he scores, he ends up
[00:09:09] making this video because Messi doesn't open doors
[00:09:13] for him because he doesn't want to get involved with politics, he never wanted to get
[00:09:16] involved, he wants me to open the door because the truth is if you make a
[00:09:20] video, let's see, you are an excellent lawyer, I don't see you Pablo
[00:09:23] making a video comparing yourself with Burlando, Burlando, Burlando and you are
[00:09:27] Pablo G. Olivera, I don't think my
[00:09:30] law has compared
[00:09:32] with Messi at all, I think he gave a
[00:09:36] message that was a nice message, what message? He compared himself all
[00:09:39] the time.
[00:09:44] he compared is the attitude that happens to all of us and in
[00:09:47] any field, what Messi has is from
[00:09:50] frustration, not believing it, nor believing
[00:09:54] success,
[00:09:57] that people interpret other things,
[00:10:01] I listen with respect, I listen with respect, don't limit yourself to just
[00:10:05] that, I think that my law, he didn't want to be
[00:10:08] oblivious to everything that happened nationally, it was practically like
[00:10:11] a very important night for all Argentines and he, well,
[00:10:15] accompanying the current events, wanted
[00:10:18] to compare himself at that important
[00:10:20] point that both
[00:10:24] the Nation. The Argentine Republic, another world champion,
[00:10:27] so the importance of this, of
[00:10:29] being resilient, in that aspect he compared himself, we don't
[00:10:33] really know about Miley's life, no, no, no
[00:10:37] we haven't had the opportunity, we haven't had the opportunity to
[00:10:40] delve into it, exactly, well, perhaps
[00:10:43] he's very hermetic too, he had
[00:10:46] a very particular bond with his parents, yes, well, until before being
[00:10:50] president he didn't speak to them, he was so hermetic with the loves he
[00:10:53] had. It's
[00:16:43] to get into it now, you know that politics, the
[00:16:46] spectacle and the show, people like them a lot, but there are also many
[00:16:50] police cases that are related to the world of
[00:16:53] show business, right? Of the spectacle, the police cases
[00:16:57] of the world of entertainment, let's go with that plate,
[00:17:01] Dana please, let's put it in full, because there are many characters who
[00:17:04] these days are having issues with the...
[00:17:08] We're just going to do a review of them and we're going to
[00:17:10] try to get into a couple of them there, the doctors, both Pablo Gómez de Olivera
[00:17:14] and Dr. Mónica Salvador have
[00:17:17] a lot of information on all this at hand, let's clear the screen a bit
[00:17:21] Ricardo and let's look there we have Callejero who
[00:17:24] just recovered conditional
[00:17:26] freedom, he met his son Callejero
[00:17:30] Fino, these are police cases, let me
[00:17:33] clean the screen for you if you can remove the graphics please, yes, then
[00:17:36] we have eh, Piti Álvarez, who is also in a complicated
[00:17:40] situation, no, we can't talk about the health
[00:17:44] of Piti Álvarez, eh, so the justice system stated at
[00:17:48] the request of the lawyers and those who care for him, eh, there's
[00:17:51] also the issue of Joaquín Levinton and Paula, this girl
[00:17:55] who was harassing him, an important issue is also that of
[00:17:58] Facundo Moyano and the meeting with Candela with a restraining
[00:18:02] order, there's Maxione's, there's Otoki's,
[00:18:05] Rossi's, do you remember Rossi,
[00:18:16] somehow with sports as in Diego's case and with
[00:18:20] police cases, let's see if you tell
[00:18:22] me, uh, give me one to tell the public right now, I'd like
[00:18:26] to start with Maradona with the news of the Maradona case
[00:18:30] that we have, we have a report on Maradona guys because
[00:18:33] of course this that seems like old, the trial, uh, this.
[00:18:37] It's just starting, well, but the closing arguments were read on
[00:18:40] Thursday, you have to understand that part because everyone says the
[00:18:43] closing arguments were read, but what's really important about the
[00:18:47] closing arguments, it's an important part, but
[00:18:50] it's a preclusion, meaning there won't
[00:18:53] be any more evidence, there won't be any more witnesses,
[00:18:57] the debate has been closed, there's no
[00:19:00] more trial, now the evidence begins to be valued, but
[00:19:04] you can't present witnesses, that stage has already been closed. That's
[00:19:09] they want to demonstrate today cannot be
[00:19:12] demonstrated and the qualification of the prosecutors
[00:19:16] there, the prosecutor already asked for the penalties and sentences, he divided it into two
[00:19:19] categories for eventual malice where the
[00:19:22] doctor, the medical doctor, is,
[00:19:25] eventual malice where the doctor is, eventual malice is
[00:19:28] when he had intention, meaning he had
[00:19:31] intention, he could have avoided it and he didn't avoid it, there he put
[00:19:35] the surgeon. They are.
[00:19:45] Give me Maradona's photo if you can, the individual ones we have of each one
[00:19:51] is right because they qualify it as simple homicide with
[00:19:55] eventual malice, but to the rest, to the rest they attribute a
[00:19:58] negligent homicide which is totally, there is an
[00:20:01] acquittal,
[00:20:04] the information from the team is very well
[00:20:07] qualified, uh, I'd like to share the report we have on
[00:20:11] Maradona to contextualize a
[00:20:14] bit what happened in the last few hours with the sentences being requested.
[00:20:18] Do we have the ok on the report Dana, let's
[00:20:21] go, go, let's go, okay,
[00:20:25] okay, here it comes, here it comes, I mean all this
[00:20:27] that happened with the Maradona case, the daughters had to
[00:20:31] witness and they covered their faces, there we have Diego Armando Maradona
[00:20:35] but the daughters had to witness, cover their faces
[00:20:38] when they were showing what they were showing, something
[00:20:41] very painful for the whole family, the trial is this, the
[00:20:44] confrontation, the immediacy are principles
[00:20:47] that there are. that speaks of
[00:20:51] orality, this is an oral trial and unfortunately one has to speak, one has to
[00:20:54] express and one has to say things that can affect
[00:20:58] the family. Well, let's watch the report and now we'll debate it and the lawyers will add
[00:21:02] data and we'll all get into the topic of Maradona, the closing arguments were read, here's the
[00:21:06] report.
[00:21:09] And there's less and less time to know if there will be justice for the death of Diego
[00:21:13] Maradona, almost 6 months after the start of the trial, through which
[00:21:17] 70 witnesses passed in 50 hearings.
[00:21:50] and they turn around, there were
[00:21:53] the room, despite the
[00:21:55] anguish,
[00:21:58] and the prosecutors treated the team that had the responsibility of
[00:22:02] caring for Diego as improvisers who forgot they were treating a vulnerable
[00:22:05] and complex patient. For the accused, they requested these
[00:22:09] sentences: for the neurosurgeon Leopoldo Luque,
[00:22:12] 12 years in prison and 10 years of disqualification; for Dr.
[00:22:16] Nancy Forlini, medical service coordinator, 10 years of...
[00:22:20] prison and 10 years of disqualification; for the psychiatrist Agostina Kosachov,
[00:22:23] 8 years in prison and 10 years of disqualification. The three accused
[00:22:27] for the crime of simple homicide with eventual intent. For the psychologist
[00:22:31] Carlos Díaz, they requested 5 years in prison and 10 years
[00:22:34] of disqualification. In the case of the nurse Mariano
[00:22:38] Perroni, 4 years in prison and eight of
[00:22:41] disqualification. And for the nurse Ricardo Almirón, 4
[00:22:45] years in prison and eight of disqualification. The
[00:22:48] last three accused.
[00:22:51] for negligent homicide. Pay attention, the surprise of the day was received by the clinical
[00:22:55] doctor Pedro Dispaña, without charges
[00:22:58] because the prosecutors considered that he acted only as a
[00:23:02] consultation doctor.
[00:23:05] And in response to these arguments by the prosecution, what did the
[00:23:09] defense lawyers for Agustina Kosachov and Leopoldo Luque say? We
[00:23:12] hear them. In terms of criminal dogmatics, the accusation has serious
[00:23:16] deficiencies, in terms of evidence, decontextualized audio was reproduced.
[00:23:20] In medical terms, the statements of the witnesses who were here from
[00:23:25] valued, so now the "change" is missing, as it would be
[00:23:28] popularly said, that our argument. It really seems senseless to me that, for example, the
[00:23:32] prosecution at the beginning talks about them ignoring the seriousness of the situation and
[00:23:36] then comes to request a deliberate crime that precisely has to do with knowing
[00:23:39] something, but well we will
[00:23:42] the foreseeable that there would be a
[00:23:46] request, let's say, for a conviction for eventual malice, we have...
[00:23:50] the confidence that the
[00:23:52] sentence will not be in that sense, because the
[00:23:55] evidence proved that Kosachov's conduct was correct, the
[00:23:59] truth is that the prosecution's argument is correct, we disagree
[00:24:02] regarding the legal classification, she was only the
[00:24:05] psychiatrist, she medicated him from the psychiatric point of view
[00:24:09] and the forensic experts said that the medication was correct, meaning it had no incidence in the
[00:24:13] death.
[00:24:16] Maradona's daughters, we spoke with him. He
[00:24:20] thanks justice for finally getting to where it did,
[00:24:24] listen, we are at a stage
[00:24:27] that many thought we
[00:24:31] wouldn't reach, this trial was
[00:24:34] sabotaged, they even tried as a strategy to
[00:24:38] seek suspensions to
[00:24:41] do something that only harms, I want to make
[00:24:45] this very clear, the victims,
[00:24:48] it only harms... Dalma, Gianinna, all of Diego Armando
[00:24:52] Maradona's children, for the victims the pain has
[00:24:55] grown, especially in a wound that they cannot
[00:24:58] close, they cannot turn the page,
[00:25:01] precisely because justice did not give them an
[00:25:04] answer, I today want to thank
[00:25:08] the justice of the province of Buenos Aires, and if we really reached
[00:25:12] this instance, uh, the
[00:25:15] true protagonists of this are them, prosecutors
[00:25:19] uh and... times, no, no, no, the
[00:25:21] parties.
[00:25:25] Strong, strong, everything Maradona's family had to go through, with
[00:25:28] this we understand, doctors, that the case is concluded, as Pablo
[00:25:32] said, no, let's see, here the evidence
[00:25:35] stage, no more witnesses can be presented,
[00:25:39] 45 hearings, 70 witnesses, all the
[00:25:43] documentary evidence that was reproduced right there in the trial, today
[00:25:46] that stage is concluded, now comes
[00:25:50] the closing arguments which is to analyze each of the elements and each one
[00:25:53] presents their position, the closing arguments are over, the
[00:25:57] sentence requested by the prosecutor is already there, the prosecutor so that
[00:26:00] Burlando understands.
[00:26:02] Because the private party also has to
[00:26:05] express itself regarding, well, but the prosecutor's request, the prosecutor is the one who
[00:26:09] represents the state, the state has already requested certain
[00:26:12] penalties, but we also have to take into account three issues
[00:26:15] that the prosecutor's office also decided that were not as publicized, that
[00:26:19] they did not request immediate detention, so if they get
[00:26:23] the maximum penalty because generally the prosecutor's office asks for the maximum penalty and the
[00:26:27] court of those 10 is very likely to give them much less
[00:26:30] then but in case. that they would be given the
[00:26:33] maximum penalty, they do not request immediate detention
[00:26:37] because they are always in the right,
[00:26:40] they are only prohibited from leaving the country
[00:26:43] abroad because their passports will be withheld, but they can
[00:26:47] present themselves in neighboring countries, meaning
[00:26:50] that although they will have the penalty, they will have
[00:26:54] disqualification, the penalty, of course, disqualification
[00:26:57] also gave them a certain character that they will not be behind the
[00:27:01] sensation that it is a... don't think that they will be behind bars because they won't
[00:27:05] be if they are in the right, doesn't it give you the feeling that it's a party
[00:27:09] or a free-for-all, Pablo, it's quite the opposite, let's see, the defense argument
[00:27:12] is to analyze each of the evidence and present it before a tribunal, there are three people
[00:27:16] who are watching you, which is the tribunal, they are three judges, sorry,
[00:27:19] sorry, clarify something, tribunal that this
[00:27:23] trial had to be suspended, maybe
[00:27:26] well, with another tribunal, but I feel the previous
[00:27:29] judge.
[00:27:32] I feel ashamed, ashamed of this justice
[00:27:36] of some within the justice system,
[00:27:40] but you say the tribunal, the tribunal, because let's see,
[00:27:43] if I, let's see, I haven't read everything, everything that is the
[00:27:47] argument, but if the prosecutor says well, I don't do it or
[00:27:50] doesn't express it, I make the reservation,
[00:27:54] before a non-favorable conviction, I go to cassation,
[00:27:57] it's not necessary to say it, why, because the same norm imposes it on you,
[00:28:01] so. it can go to
[00:28:04] same, the same norm imposes that the detainee can go because there is a
[00:28:08] conviction and in that expectation they can request it,
[00:28:11] so when the tribunal
[00:28:14] condemns, all these prisoners will have to be there, one
[00:28:18] question and and we have some commitments, guys, one question, to
[00:28:21] show Diego's deceased
[00:28:24] state, horrible, I asked, horrible, is it a media
[00:28:27] move or is it a legal move, no, it's a legal move,
[00:28:31] it's demonstrating the truth. attention
[00:28:46] because the quantum pass arrives, which is an easy,
[00:28:50] effective technique to make energy applications
[00:28:54] that will facilitate balance and will enhance
[00:28:57] the body's innate ability to heal, it is taught by Susana
[00:29:01] Mahul, it is online. it will give you a daily resource
[00:29:04] to be able to recover energy and connect to states of
[00:29:08] peace, in these challenging times, this is next
[00:29:11] October 17th, you will be able to learn to connect with the frequency
[00:29:15] and also give it to others. Susana Majul of bonbons for
[00:29:19] the soul presents, look
[00:29:22] Saturday, October 17th, gate of
[00:29:25] healing, the quantum pass,
[00:29:29] soul medicine, learn.
[00:29:33] Secret keys to use your own energetic transmission
[00:29:36] channel that heals, clear
[00:29:40] connection to achieve silent changes that
[00:29:44] organize and improve the lives of both under the
[00:29:47] conscious guidance of your divinity, we
[00:29:51] await you,
[00:29:54] a big kiss, dear Majule, Cuchina
[00:29:57] Donore Alicia de Justo 1768
[00:30:01] in Puerto Madero has it. They use the sapphire
[00:30:18] technique,
[00:30:19] make
[00:30:24] your hair look naturally perfect because at
[00:30:27] medical hair your hair grows, it always grows,
[00:30:30] look.
[00:30:54] Attention, Dariota Ucedo Dental and aesthetic, makes your smile
[00:30:57] the best of all and also health.