CTV — broadcast
20261012 030000 UTC
131 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:01:30] Nonsense. Frankly, why has Taiwan become
[00:01:33] like this today? It's because of the Democratic Progressive Party.
[00:01:37] Now they're turning around and telling you, "Actually,
[00:01:41] you know, the most disgusting thing they say is that actually death row is more expensive
[00:01:45] than advanced prisons." When I heard that, I was shocked.
[00:01:47] 。
[00:01:50] They say that because of death row, according to our current regulations,
[00:01:54] we have to repeatedly allow them to appeal, and appeal again.
[00:01:58] So, what about the judicial costs incurred in the meantime?
[00:04:00] What does this mean?
[00:04:02] So, if someone comes and kills Yue Yuan Zhi today, I'll go out and join the party.
[00:04:06] Then it's just my bad luck. Is that what it means?
[00:04:09] Are you, the judge, suggesting that if someone wants to kill in the future, everyone should just get out of the way and let them
[00:04:13] be killed, and then you won't have any problems? Is that what the judge is suggesting?
[00:04:17] Or do you still want to save me?
[00:05:00] I think many people share my opinion, so do you want to force the people to do this?
[00:05:03] It's all because of you, Chen Boyang and his ilk,
[00:05:07] this group of leftists who have messed up the entire country.
[00:05:11] 帐 气 。
[00:05:12] Judicial justice no longer exists.
[00:05:15] This is the current situation in Taiwan.
[00:05:17] So, how much longer will we tolerate this chaos?
[00:05:23] Actually, it's very simple. Ever since these
[00:05:28] grand justices preemptively
[00:05:31] ruled that our
[00:05:34] death penalty
[00:05:36] must be for the most serious crimes, I knew it was over.
[00:05:39] And then there are all the appeals and re-appeals.
[00:06:12] So I think we just abolished the citizen judge system ourselves.
[00:06:16] Because citizen judges are basically just helping you professional
[00:06:19] judges take the blame.
[00:06:22] So that day, you know, after the verdict came out, the citizen judges,
[00:06:25] six citizen judges, five of them didn't show up.
[00:06:28] 。
[00:06:31] The only citizen judge who came out also looked distressed.
[00:06:33] Don't do this anymore.
[00:06:37] 。
[00:06:40] Everyone might have the chance to be elected as a citizen judge.
[00:08:12] Why does the government get the most satisfaction from executing the death penalty? He explained,
[00:08:14] "Because as long as the death penalty is executed, votes will increase."
[00:08:18] Okay, so Shen Boyang said that abolishing the death penalty is not just
[00:08:22] because of wrongful convictions; the key is the deviation in the execution of the death penalty. This
[00:08:26] was an article written by Shen Boyang in 2014 at that time.
[00:08:30] Okay, so, was the judicial justice that the people originally hoped for
[00:08:34] just to make the government feel happy in Shen Boyang's eyes
[00:08:37] at that time?
[00:08:39] ?
[00:09:12] Is that so? The state power has also done many things. The state can also
[00:09:16] take money from our pockets, because we have to pay taxes. So can you just
[00:09:20] take money from other people's pockets at will? Some people are not assigned to perform duties, some people are
[00:09:23] imprisoned. So can the state imprison people, and you can just lock people in the toilet for no reason?
[00:09:27] ?
[00:09:33] And in fact, in the past, he was very proud of
[00:09:37] abolishing the death penalty. He was very proud of it. He often published articles to
[00:09:41] express his stance on abolishing the death penalty. It's as if abolishing the death penalty makes him very progressive,
[00:09:45] very enlightened. This is being leftist, thinking it's very radical.
[00:09:48] Now there's the death penalty, that's too conservative, how can there be a death
[00:09:52] penalty? We must abolish it. Or before, everyone discussed drugs a lot.
[00:09:56] Drugs, everyone thinks drug abuse harms others and themselves, so drugs should be criminalized.
[00:10:00] 。
[00:10:05] He's that kind of person who takes a very radical path.
[00:10:07] This is his true self.
[00:10:10] 。
[00:10:25] Actually, he is this kind of person.
[00:10:27] So I'm
[00:10:30] really surprised that after working with him for two or three years, he suddenly changed completely.
[00:10:34] An election can really change a person.
[00:10:36] 。
[00:10:42] He knows that taking a moderate and rational path will get
[00:10:46] him votes. So he is completely different from his true self.
[00:10:50] 。
[00:11:25] A very cruel person, just like in the past, or even worse, because
[00:11:29] he has changed for too long in the past.
[00:12:26] And this family has suffered endless pain. A good
[00:12:30] wife or a good mother is just gone. And
[00:12:34] this teacher was so contributive to society, just gone. Then
[00:12:37] , at first, he was sentenced to death, but later, because
[00:12:41] the grand justices nominated by the Democratic Progressive Party, a bunch of abolitionist grand justices, made the death penalty
[00:12:45] very difficult to implement. So this case was retried,
[00:12:49] and as a result, the murderer escaped death. Later,
[00:12:52] this teacher,
[00:13:02] in fact, the true victims are these victims'
[00:13:05] families, with endless pain in their hearts.
[00:13:09] 。
[00:13:13] A good teacher lost her life. The murderer still has his life. And then, because the family
[00:13:17] did not get
[00:13:20] so, they fell into despair.
[00:13:27] Is that fair? Is Chen Boyang fair? You've always emphasized abolishing the death penalty,
[00:13:31] is that fair? Is this the society
[00:13:34] you want?
[00:13:38] And not to mention many other various cases. A drunk
[00:13:42] driver killed a New Taipei City employee.
[00:13:46] Similarly, that day at the anti-abolition event, his father was also
[00:13:50] there. Everyone thinks that the Democratic Progressive Party's self-proclaimed
[00:13:53] progressive ideology actually hurts how many
[00:13:57] kind people's hearts.
[00:14:13] You say you support the death penalty. Don't you know? The example I just gave
[00:14:17] is like this. When they couldn't argue anymore, they said they supported the current ruling.
[00:14:20] But I don't think this is what everyone wants. So
[00:14:24] if.
[00:15:25] But the problem is that in fact, these sisters were later
[00:15:29] murdered, weren't they even deprived of the chance to breathe?
[00:15:32] ?
[00:17:08] Well, Chen Boyang's proposition, indeed, in his article, advocates
[00:17:12] for community activity centers.
[00:17:14] 。
[00:17:27] government is also doing it.
[00:17:28] 。
[00:17:33] Professional organizations, professional personnel to assist.
[00:18:37] In fact, they are, I think,
[00:18:40] as the court said, they believe that abolishing the death penalty,
[00:18:44] drug abuse, drugs, these are all progressive values,
[00:18:48] right? The progressive values of the Democratic Progressive Party.
[00:19:06] It doesn't matter. What you said originally is what it is. Taipei City is
[00:19:10] the capital region, and I think the people of Taipei are also very kind. And the people of Taipei
[00:19:14] City are also very wise. I believe the people will not elect someone
[00:19:18] who can tolerate and say that death row inmates should always be protected.
[00:19:22] This power. You must kill three people to be considered
[00:19:26] guilty of the death penalty.
[00:19:28] 。
[00:24:20] I especially want to say that our Taiwanese law has the death penalty, it's you judges,
[00:24:23] it's our own Taiwanese government that has refrained from implementing the death penalty according to the law.
[00:24:27] This is your government's problem. On the contrary, the government we elected in Taiwan
[00:24:31] is breaking the law itself, not executing the death penalty. From the perspective of the victim,
[00:24:35] the death penalty is not the best conclusion. However, I specifically say that we are just ordinary people.
[00:24:39] From our perspective, it is to give the families
[00:24:43] of these victims psychological comfort,
[00:24:47] so that they can let go.
[00:28:32] As long as I don't kill the third person, or don't kill to death, then I won't be sentenced.
[00:28:38] Is that unfair to the stones?
[00:28:41] So we have a saying, "A life for a life." This is a fundamental principle of human beings. In Taiwan, I find it hard to imagine why 80-90% of people support the death penalty, but these 80-90% of people's names are often suppressed by those one or two percent who think they are educated.