ESPRESO — broadcast
20260920 113000 UTC
502 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:01:51] Good health! We are the third separate assault brigade, the 47th
[00:01:55] Magura brigade, the 110th mechanized brigade,
[00:01:58] the 159th brigade. Every day we fight for our
[00:02:01] freedom and independence. Every day of silence is a day of continuous
[00:02:05] battle, the price of our lives. We hear you, we see everything. Children's drawings,
[00:02:09] warm socks, flags on balconies. Today, drones and
[00:02:12] REBs are not only protection, but an effective way to neutralize the enemy.
[00:02:16] A drone is our eyes, a precise strike. A pickup truck is quick
[00:02:19] evacuation and saved lives. We appeal to you with
[00:02:22] a request to join our fundraiser. We will not give up,
[00:02:26] we stand for you. Wake up, donate. We win together. Glory to
[00:02:30] Ukraine. Glory to the heroes. The charitable fund
[00:02:33] Vesna is raising funds for the third assault,
[00:02:36] 47th, 110th, and 159th
[00:02:39] mechanized brigades for drones, REBs, and
[00:02:43] pickup trucks. Let's protect those who protect us.
[00:02:58] This is the Saturday Political Club and now to a topic that
[00:03:02] for a long time seemed
[00:03:04] like something out of science fiction, it seemed impossible, and yet it
[00:03:07] happened. Congress, Senate, and now
[00:03:11] Trump's signature, and the so-called
[00:03:14] hellish sanctions of the late Graham
[00:03:17] and, God bless him, Blumenthal, two
[00:03:20] senators, Republicans and a Democrat,
[00:03:23] have been adopted, and now it is officially a law that is supposed to
[00:03:26] come into force. There, well, I'll briefly remind you
[00:03:30] that those who will actively continue to buy oil from
[00:03:34] the Russian Federation will be subject to
[00:03:38] a 100% duty. Banks,
[00:03:41] defense, energy, the shadow fleet, the main
[00:03:45] Kremlin's cash register are under attack. Will these sanctions work? How to
[00:03:48] evaluate this decision? Will it be a breakthrough and why, in
[00:03:51] principle, did the Americans go for this, and Trump signed
[00:03:55] this law? I think precisely because nothing
[00:03:58] really changes in American... Russian relations and relations of the United
[00:04:02] States with those countries that buy Russian oil until
[00:04:06] Trump decides to actually
[00:04:09] apply this law. By
[00:04:12] the way, you might have noticed that Trump always signs
[00:04:15] important principled laws for television viewers.
[00:04:18] Remember the
[00:04:21] tariff law that introduced duties against many
[00:04:25] countries? It was signed in
[00:04:28] the White House rose garden.
[00:04:31] Therefore, Trump triumphantly stood with some
[00:04:33] tablet.
[00:04:35] Here, the White House simply announced that Trump signed this law
[00:04:39] dryly, without any ceremony, without any
[00:04:42] words from Trump. He did not talk about it, did not explain
[00:04:46] it at a meeting with journalists that took place literally on the eve of
[00:04:48] the signing about the importance of this law, although he himself
[00:04:52] insisted that sanctions
[00:04:55] against Iran should also be included in this law. Well, let's
[00:04:59] see. When Ling and
[00:05:02] Blumenthal proposed this law, it
[00:05:05] provided a rather simple
[00:05:08] procedure, the President of the United States
[00:05:11] addresses the President of the Russian
[00:05:13] Federation with a demand to cease fire
[00:05:17] within, I think, 15 or 30 days, I don't remember which version, how many
[00:05:20] days it was, on the Russian-Ukrainian
[00:05:23] front, to establish
[00:05:27] peace.
[00:05:29] If the President of the Russian Federation
[00:05:31] refuses
[00:05:34] to do so, the President of the United States
[00:05:37] is obliged
[00:05:39] to introduce a 500% duty on
[00:05:43] products from Russia and
[00:05:45] countries that buy Russian oil. Well,
[00:05:49] a serious decision.
[00:05:52] Then Lindsey Graham started negotiating this law with Trump.
[00:05:55] For one and a half years, he negotiated, negotiated, negotiated,
[00:05:58] negotiated, negotiated, negotiated,
[00:06:00] he died.
[00:06:04] The moment when he hadn't fully negotiated yet, but was already
[00:06:07] close. What was the
[00:06:10] result, that the President of the
[00:06:13] United
[00:06:14] States of America
[00:06:17] has the right, if he wishes,
[00:06:20] to introduce duties of up to
[00:06:22] 100%
[00:06:25] against the five main
[00:06:27] countries
[00:06:29] that buy oil from the Russian Federation by
[00:06:32] volume,
[00:06:36] or not to introduce them,
[00:06:39] it absolutely depends on the President's decision. Why is this
[00:06:43] important? Because
[00:06:46] the President, according to American
[00:06:49] law, does not have the right to introduce duties on
[00:06:53] products from other countries without the consent of Congress. And
[00:06:57] that is why the Supreme Court of the United States forbade
[00:07:00] Trump from imposing duties on the whole
[00:07:03] world, and Trump lost the tariff war. Thanks to
[00:07:06] the decision of his Supreme Court. And now
[00:07:10] Congress seems to allow Trump
[00:07:13] to impose duties on products from other countries, but only
[00:07:17] those first five
[00:07:20] які
[00:07:22] that buy energy from the Russian Federation. That's
[00:07:26] why a huge number of Democrats did not vote for this law, because they
[00:07:29] believed that Trump could manipulate it for the purpose of
[00:07:33] continuing his trade wars.
[00:07:36] So, the question arises,
[00:07:37] питання.
[00:07:41] which are these first five countries that buy energy from the Russian
[00:07:44] Federation? These are the People's Republic of China and India,
[00:07:48] first and foremost. The amount
[00:07:52] of energy that other countries receive, even from the top five,
[00:07:55] is insignificant. And among these countries are
[00:07:59] allies of the United States and Ukraine, for example, Turkey.
[00:08:02] Uh-huh. Now, now the main
[00:08:06] question:
[00:08:09] to what extent will Trump be ready to introduce 100%
[00:08:13] duties for the People's Republic of China, because we already perfectly understand that the current
[00:08:16] situation is that
[00:08:19] Trump already tried to introduce duties against
[00:08:22] China.
[00:08:24] He burned himself so badly on this, it turned out that the American economy,
[00:08:28] and its strategic industries, are so
[00:08:30] seriously dependent on the People's Republic of
[00:08:32] China
[00:08:35] that introducing any duties on Chinese goods is a shot
[00:08:39] in the foot. Trump lost the tariff
[00:08:42] war to China, he will not start it again.
[00:08:45] India, India is more sensitive to
[00:08:49] Chinese tariffs. But they have already stated
[00:08:53] that they will continue to buy Russian oil, even if duties are imposed. Why?
[00:08:57] Чому?
[00:09:00] When India started buying Russian oil, it was
[00:09:04] a premium commodity for the Indian
[00:09:06] economy. That is, India
[00:09:10] bought Russian oil... for
[00:09:12] rupees, which it is still unknown how it gave back to
[00:09:15] the Russians,
[00:09:18] and then converted this oil into petroleum products
[00:09:21] and sold them on the world market for dollars. Excellent business
[00:09:25] for every bird. Before the start of Russia's large-scale war against
[00:09:29] Ukraine, India did not buy any Russian oil at all, because it was
[00:09:32] expensive, and it did not create much profit for India,
[00:09:35] but now the situation has fundamentally
[00:09:39] changed. Due to the blockade of oil routes in Hormuz
[00:09:43] and the prospect of such a blockade in Bab el-Mandeb, India simply
[00:09:47] needs Russian oil not only as a premium product, but as
[00:09:50] a way to somehow close the gaps that are created in India's oil refining
[00:09:54] complex due to the lack of oil and due to
[00:09:57] the depletion of
[00:10:00] strategic reserves. I always say that the real crisis and the real
[00:10:04] disaster will not begin when the blockade of
[00:10:07] the Strait of Hormuz continues, but when the countries of the world exhaust their strategic oil
[00:10:11] reserves. Then we will be in big trouble, we will reach this point
[00:10:14] if the issue of Hormuz is not resolved for some
[00:10:18] time. There is simply a lot of oil accumulated in the world, but
[00:10:21] now, due to the fact that this land
[00:10:25] pipeline from Saudi Arabia is already being blocked, it is approaching this
[00:10:28] point of no return, so we will definitely
[00:10:31] face an energy crisis of unprecedented proportions. In such a situation,
[00:10:34] India understands this. Well, after all, it is a country with
[00:10:38] a billion people, it is trying to do something to
[00:10:41] prevent this. Trump himself
[00:10:44] accuses us of increasing the price of diesel with our attacks on Russia,
[00:10:48] so what claims can there be against
[00:10:51] India or China?
[00:10:55] Thus, these articles of the law are simply illogical
[00:10:58] from the point of view of real
[00:11:00] possibilities,
[00:11:04] because it is unknown, even if duties of up to 100% are imposed on
[00:11:07] India for its products to the States,
[00:11:10] it is unknown what would be more profitable for India,
[00:11:14] to agree not to buy oil from Russia so that there are no such
[00:11:18] duties, or to put up with these duties, reduce its
[00:11:22] trade with the United States, but continue to buy oil. What if there won't be
[00:11:25] oil in India, it's unknown what could start in
[00:11:28] India itself in terms of social standards, in terms of
[00:11:31] fuel prices and so on. India is not the United
[00:11:34] States, people there may react differently to
[00:11:38] everything. So, it seems to me that all these
[00:11:42] expectations regarding this law are not exaggerated, all this generally
[00:11:46] has nothing to do with reality. I
[00:11:49] simply look with wide open eyes at
[00:11:52] the reaction of many people, including people whom I greatly... consider in the
[00:11:55] American, Ukrainian diaspora,
[00:11:59] who write about this law as a huge achievement, as if not
[00:12:02] noticing that the real law on assistance
[00:12:05] to Ukraine, the act on support for Ukraine, which provides for
[00:12:08] financial
[00:12:11] injections into the Ukrainian budget, multi-billion dollar, military aid,
[00:12:14] new orders to American military
[00:12:18] enterprises, this is what was previously under
[00:12:20] Biden, that this act, which has already been
[00:12:23] adopted by the House of Representatives,
[00:12:27] is lying in the Senate and no one is even going to vote on it. And even if you
[00:12:31] imagine that the senators somehow voted for it, I am sure that there was
[00:12:34] a majority in the Senate, it's just that the leader of the Republican majority
[00:12:38] in the Senate, Senator Thune, will not put it to a vote, and it is impossible to bypass him
[00:12:42] there, this applies to the House of Representatives. So I am sure that Trump would never
[00:12:46] have signed such a law, unlike
[00:12:49] this law, which does not create any problems for
[00:12:52] him. So, this is a purely
[00:12:56] decorative pre-election story that will not affect
[00:12:59] the Russian-Ukrainian war. Call
[00:13:02] it hellish sanctions, don't call it that.
[00:13:06] Senator Graham himself agreed to gut this
[00:13:08] law.
[00:13:11] And if we are talking simply about the memory of Senator Graham, this will be
[00:13:14] such a memory. Of a person who had
[00:13:17] principles, but who was ready to compromise them for
[00:13:21] the sake of understanding with Trump. To replace
[00:13:25] a real weapon with
[00:13:28] a plastic mock-up of a
[00:13:30] rifle, so as not to quarrel with the American
[00:13:34] president. Now the question is, are there any positive
[00:13:38] aspects to this law? Yes, they also
[00:13:41] need to be noticed. Firstly, no
[00:13:44] President of the United States can now, without the consent of Congress,
[00:13:47] cancel sanctions imposed against Russia by the administrations of Barack
[00:13:51] Obama, Donald Trump, and Joseph
[00:13:55] Biden. That is, even if Trump now, after his
[00:13:59] signature, wanted to weaken sanctions against the Russian Federation, he
[00:14:02] can no longer do so, which, of course,
[00:14:06] creates a dead end in any of his relations with
[00:14:09] Putin, if he wanted to weaken
[00:14:11] sanctions in response to some concessions
[00:14:15] from Putin in the Russian-Ukrainian war. That is,
[00:14:18] Congress can agree to a relaxation of sanctions only when it believes that these
[00:14:22] concessions are sufficient
[00:14:24] to... consider the war to be
[00:14:27] over. This is a real moment of this law, that it
[00:14:31] actually deprived the Trump administration of the freedom
[00:14:34] of sanction maneuvering. All these sanctions will be in effect.
[00:14:38] And, by the way, I must tell you honestly,
[00:14:42] most likely they will now be in effect forever.
[00:14:45] This law has placed a barrier on Russian-American economic
[00:14:48] relations for decades.
[00:14:51] Remember, Mr. Andriy, the story of the Jackson amendment? Yes,
[00:14:55] of course, this amendment was introduced against the Soviet
[00:14:59] Union in the 70s, uh-huh, in protest
[00:15:03] against the persecution of
[00:15:06] religious minorities, uh-huh, more often talking about Jews,
[00:15:10] but there were also Protestant minorities
[00:15:12] in the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was not supposed to receive access to
[00:15:16] technological products. Fortunately, this became one of the major
[00:15:19] reasons for its decline and collapse. But
[00:15:22] the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. And no one canceled the amendment. It
[00:15:26] was canceled decades later
[00:15:29] десятирічча
[00:15:32] for the former Soviet republics that had already become independent
[00:15:35] states. And before that,
[00:15:37] these countries, including Ukraine, did not have access to certain supplies of
[00:15:41] technical products from the United States of
[00:15:43] America.
[00:15:46] And the same will happen with this law: The Russian-Ukrainian war
[00:15:50] will end, all restrictions on Russia's economic
[00:15:54] activity in relations with the United States will remain in effect for another
[00:15:57] 20 years. You'll see, that's
[00:16:00] all. This is an important point, it may not affect
[00:16:03] the very process of ending the war, because
[00:16:07] Russia withstood these sanctions, but it will definitely affect
[00:16:10] the degradation of relations, no matter what happens in Russia
[00:16:14] after Putin. This is one very important positive
[00:16:17] Це один дуже важливий момент,
[00:16:18] point. The second
[00:16:22] positive point may be in the logic of delayed
[00:16:26] punishment. Well, that is, we can
[00:16:30] be in the office of the head of some large
[00:16:33] oil refining enterprise in India or
[00:16:35] China. And we can sit and talk like
[00:16:39] we are talking now, and decide that Trump will most likely
[00:16:43] not impose 100%
[00:16:45] sanctions. Well, we just
[00:16:47] analyzed
[00:16:49] it now and understood that he won't impose them. But we are not the heads of an oil refining
[00:16:53] plant, are we? Uh-huh. And if we
[00:16:56] were the heads of an oil refining plant, say, you are the director, I am
[00:16:59] the chief engineer. I am telling you all this, I am telling
[00:17:03] you, you see, we ordered analytics from serious people, here
[00:17:07] on... the pages, it won't be introduced, here's another analytical piece, and
[00:17:10] what do you tell me? Well,
[00:17:13] you are the chief engineer, but what will happen if he introduces it?
[00:17:17] Uh-huh. Oh, well, Mr. Director,
[00:17:20] I don't even want to tell you the consequences, uh-huh, it's just
[00:17:23] such consequences, in such numbers, we'll see such numbers, you don't even need to
[00:17:27] know such numbers, because you'll have a heart attack, you have a weak heart, I respect
[00:17:30] you, your esteemed wife, I don't want her to worry, I won't tell you about
[00:17:34] the consequences. So maybe the chief engineer can tell us about
[00:17:38] the volume of Russian oil, well, just in case. Well, it's clear that he won't
[00:17:41] introduce it, but he's so unpredictable, such a strange
[00:17:44] person. What if something gets under his tail and he
[00:17:48] introduces it? What will we do after that? We will go bankrupt. But unfortunately,
[00:17:52] this is, this is, this is literally the rule of business, diversification of
[00:17:55] risky investments. Well, yes, well, yes, businessmen think differently
[00:17:59] than you and I. Therefore, in this regard, this law can
[00:18:02] have
[00:18:04] consequences,
[00:18:07] all kinds of sanctions. Well, and by the way, and in this lies its positive
[00:18:10] significance. By the way, all this is on the eve of the visit. Everyone will
[00:18:14] come to America for three days next week to meet with Trump. Maybe this will give some
[00:18:18] additional leverage in conversations, plus they have this postponed war of
[00:18:22] sanctions until, I think, November 10th.
[00:18:26] Yes, well, at least Xi Jinping will know that Trump has the ability to introduce
[00:18:30] duties on Chinese products at any moment,
[00:18:33] and no Supreme Court will cancel that.
[00:18:38] I'm telling you, you need to see both the positive and negative aspects, and
[00:18:42] these positive aspects are in this,
[00:18:46] so of course, if you asked me whether it's better not to vote for such a law or
[00:18:49] to vote, of course it's better to vote, it's just that you shouldn't, I would say, you shouldn't
[00:18:53] have excessive expectations, but
[00:18:55] of course, we still have
[00:18:58] seven minutes before
[00:19:02] the mandatory break. I wanted to discuss another topic, we already mentioned today
[00:19:06] that for a year and a half... President Zelensky has not held
[00:19:09] a briefing for Ukrainian journalists, there are actually many
[00:19:13] questions. I even look at Trump, well, no matter what,
[00:19:16] sometimes he says some absolute nonsense,
[00:19:18] for example, he said yesterday, it seems, that he was
[00:19:22] told that he gave China as an example,
[00:19:25] and the journalist told him that China is the most repressive
[00:19:29] state regarding media, and he said that he didn't know, he hadn't
[00:19:33] known about it, but we are also a repressive state, because we have a lot of fake news.
[00:19:39] And you look at this and think, my God, what's happening, but on the other hand, he's not afraid to say even
[00:19:43] nonsense, and there's still a feeling that some dialogue is happening, no matter what.
[00:19:46] Let me remind you that even journalists initiated a petition drive
[00:19:50] and already collected these signatures. I don't know if there's a response to it,
[00:19:53] it seems there isn't any, but for a year and a half, there's been no briefing for Ukrainian
[00:19:57] journalists. We learn some of President Zelensky's opinions through interviews
[00:20:01] with CBS, CNN, Fox News, whoever
[00:20:04] else, plus or minus irrelevant. But at the same
[00:20:08] time, there's his press secretary, who almost spoke before
[00:20:11] the European Parliament, the former former Yulia Mendel, yes, and
[00:20:15] now she's under NSDC sanctions,
[00:20:18] deserved it. I actually feel a little sorry for her husband, Pavlo Kukhta,
[00:20:21] who was a well-known reformer, a prominent activist,
[00:20:25] who advocated for some transformation,
[00:20:27] Europeanization, and now he's forced to travel with her to
[00:20:31] European parliaments, and somehow of course, all this looks very sad,
[00:20:35] but returning to this story with... Mendel, she now gives
[00:20:38] interviews where she says that in Ukraine it's a complete
[00:20:42] horror, well, not about Zelensky, but even that children under
[00:20:46] 10 years old don't learn to read here, and here we generally have jungles growing without
[00:20:50] bananas. I and this is actually such
[00:20:54] a discovery for all of us, that is, how, well, once again
[00:20:57] returning to this story,
[00:21:00] how could we get such
[00:21:04] a head of the press office? Is it enough
[00:21:07] to just impose sanctions, or should there be some other reaction, even a human
[00:21:10] one, I don't know, well, I generally believe that all these sanctions against
[00:21:14] Ukrainian citizens are some kind of wildness, both with Mendel and
[00:21:17] with anyone, because if a person is a citizen... you need, if you have
[00:21:21] claims against her, to start criminal cases,
[00:21:23] right? What are sanctions against citizens of Ukraine? This is also
[00:21:27] some strange instrument.
[00:21:31] Secondly, this is a question of personnel
[00:21:33] policy. Well, that's also a good
[00:21:36] question. The personnel
[00:21:38] policy of the President of Ukraine, it looks
[00:21:42] like this, to a great extent. We said
[00:21:45] retrospectively that now one can assume that Mendel,
[00:21:48] for example, was supposed to have been recruited by Russian intelligence agencies, for example,
[00:21:51] many years ago, just to assume, or after she
[00:21:55] stopped being a press secretary, or after that.
[00:21:59] Yes, because you remember, after she stopped
[00:22:02] being a press secretary, she wrote complementary books about Zelensky for many years.
[00:22:06] Well, so, what
[00:22:09] for? What has changed in her position
[00:22:12] during this time? So she knew so much. And she left
[00:22:16] her post and continued to enjoy her...
[00:22:20] connections with the president, right? Telling
[00:22:23] how wonderful he is, how brilliant he is, how wonderful
[00:22:26] he is.
[00:22:28] What happened after that, I don't know, maybe the money ran out,
[00:22:32] банально,
[00:22:36] well, that is, in any case, all this indicates that these are people
[00:22:39] without any principles.
[00:22:43] And you know, that
[00:22:46] Yulia Mendel, she worked for Espreso,
[00:22:49] well, I... showed herself there as a person, let's say, with
[00:22:53] rather strange behavior,
[00:22:56] but here, you know, they quickly said goodbye,
[00:22:59] she wasn't a press secretary here, of course, she was
[00:23:02] an ordinary journalist, and the President's Office seemed not to
[00:23:06] notice whom they were
[00:23:07] dealing with.
[00:23:10] Well, Mendel's behavior when she was a press secretary was already strange
[00:23:14] enough, from the very first days, literally. Yes, but
[00:23:17] Zelensky defended her, he said, I didn't let you blame... the girl, I
[00:23:21] will defend her, that's
[00:23:22] how it was. Well, why don't you defend
[00:23:26] her further, girl?
[00:23:29] It turned out that when a girl can behave not
[00:23:32] very respectfully towards journalists, it's all normal, it's
[00:23:36] okay. But if a girl crosses all boundaries towards
[00:23:39] you and the state, then sanctions can already be imposed. But everything starts
[00:23:43] small. In general, it's amazing to call your press secretary
[00:23:46] a girl, because I don't know, even...
[00:23:50] even Yanukovych, no matter how stupid and heavy he was, as
[00:23:54] one Ukrainian writer once described him, but
[00:23:57] he could afford a press secretary who was definitely smarter than
[00:24:01] him and more knowledgeable. I mean
[00:24:02] Darka Chepak,
[00:24:06] I don't even remember who Yanukovych's press secretary was, Darka
[00:24:09] Chepak, yes, Darka Chepak, and before that Hanna Herman, when he was
[00:24:13] prime minister. Well, serious professional journalists,
[00:24:15] yes, yes, with known
[00:24:19] views, at least the first time
[00:24:22] he was prime minister, but
[00:24:25] such is life. Well, in any case, he did not
[00:24:29] call them girls,
[00:24:32] in any case, we saw Yanukovych much less publicly than Zelensky, so we don't
[00:24:36] know how he behaved there. Well, that's also true, we won't
[00:24:40] think that Yanukovych was so
[00:24:41] well-mannered.
[00:24:44] Well, yes, that's right, this is, this is, listen, well, if we have a story with
[00:24:48] the prosecutor general, what's a press secretary to us?
[00:24:50] Yeah, if our prosecutor general flees abroad
[00:24:54] while being to in
[00:24:56] position, then what are we already
[00:24:59] talking about,
[00:25:02] the very approach to personnel policy needs to be changed. When you talk about
[00:25:05] journalists who want to talk to Zelensky, well, Zelensky, I think, is sincerely
[00:25:09] confident that he doesn't need any journalists as intermediaries in his contact with
[00:25:12] society, he records addresses every day, talks to society,
[00:25:16] what are these journalists to him, who from his point of view are definitely somehow
[00:25:21] some Poroshenko, some vial,
[00:25:23] paid for, what's there to talk about with them? Well,
[00:25:26] yes, I generally have such an attitude to life, I
[00:25:30] googled once if President Zelensky set his
[00:25:33] record for the number of these video addresses. It turns out, no, much was
[00:25:37] still in first place, so we still need to work on that.
[00:25:41] We'll take a short break now and
[00:25:43] return.
[00:25:59] Every day, Russian aggression brings destruction and pain to Ukraine. But
[00:26:02] no crime should go unpunished. The International Register
[00:26:06] of Damages for Ukraine is the first step towards obtaining compensation, created under
[00:26:09] the auspices of the Council of Europe, to record every loss since February 24,
[00:26:13] 2022. Anyone can submit an application.
[00:26:17] People who have lost their home, property or job, those who survived captivity or lost
[00:26:20] loved ones, businesses and the state of Ukraine. 43
[00:26:24] categories of applications are provided. You can submit one or several applications in
[00:26:28] different categories through the Diia web portal. Most
[00:26:31] of the information is pulled automatically, it's free and does not
[00:26:34] require lawyers, your data is confidential and protected.
[00:26:38] The Register accepts and processes applications from victims for compensation
[00:26:42] for damages, losses and harm caused by Russian aggression. Next,
[00:26:45] applications will be reviewed and decisions on payments will be made by the future international
[00:26:49] compensation commission for Ukraine. It will determine
[00:26:52] the amounts of payments from the future compensation fund. Do not
[00:26:55] wait for the war to end. Submit an application to the register
[00:26:58] today.
[00:27:09] Normative, effective, eases varicose
[00:27:12] symptoms.
[00:27:21] When you are tired, stressed, any trifle seems like a huge
[00:27:24] problem and irritates. Magnicum for preventing
[00:27:27] irritability and stress. Joint pain appears suddenly and
[00:27:31] restricts movement. For joint and muscle pain, German ointment
[00:27:35] with comfrey from Dr. Theiss. Ointment with comfrey
[00:27:38] from Dr. Theiss relieves pain, reduces inflammation and swelling,
[00:27:42] contains natural ingredients. Save by buying Dr. Theiss's
[00:27:45] comfrey ointment in a large package of 100
[00:27:48] g. Wow, superpower. Oh, the sausage
[00:27:52] is amazing. Kyivstar, please, we want to watch this quietly.
[00:27:55] Uh-huh. Unlimited social media. Let it be
[00:27:59] Kyivstar. Even more superpowers in the Myky app.
[00:28:02] Pain interrupted your plans? Dollgyd Cream can
[00:28:06] help you, it blocks pain and relieves
[00:28:09] inflammation. Dollgyd Cream in the yellow package, your expert against
[00:28:13] pain. I am Yaroslava Mohuchikh, Olympic champion in high
[00:28:17] jump. Why do I choose Reo? Reo restores
[00:28:20] water-electrolyte balance. Reo prevents dehydration. I don't agree to
[00:28:24] alternatives. If water, then Reo. Try the new Reo
[00:28:28] with lemon flavor. When my back aches, I take
[00:28:31] Flamides gel. Three problems are solved by one Flami-des gel for
[00:28:35] pain, for swelling, for inflammation. Flamides gel for back and
[00:28:38] joint pain. Discount up to 30% on Orecept and
[00:28:41] Orecept Herbal Kids in Podorozhnyk pharmacies. When
[00:28:45] illness and urgent help are needed,
[00:28:48] thousands of pharmacists across the country daily
[00:28:51] open the doors of pharmacies, help,
[00:28:54] consult, save from diseases, injuries,
[00:28:58] despair. Today and always,
[00:29:01] say thank you to your pharmacist for
[00:29:04] pharma care. Thank you for being there. September
[00:29:08] 19. Pharmacist Day of Ukraine.
[00:29:12] Hungary-Ukraine, only not Megogo. First
[00:29:15] test for the Maldova national team in the new season of the League of
[00:29:19] Nations. Tune in on September 25 at
[00:29:22] 21:45 exclusively on
[00:29:25] Meego.
[00:30:05] When your heart reminds you of itself, Kratal.
[00:30:08] Kratal - natural power for your
[00:30:11] heart.
[00:30:20] War. Missiles for patriots exist in the world.
[00:30:24] Strikes on
[00:30:26] Russia.
[00:30:30] Dialogue between government and society.
[00:30:39] Support for Ukraine. Behind every high-profile event
[00:30:43] lies the main question: What next? On weekdays at
[00:30:47] 20:15 on Espresso.
[00:30:50] We are raising funds for REP and two engines for military medics of the
[00:30:53] Special Operations Forces, who defend our country in the eastern
[00:30:56] direction. The enemy was.