FRANCE24 — broadcast
20261012 153000 UTC
446 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] arts to see on France
[00:00:00] early warning. the security of 24 and our social
[00:00:13] in battle order, the supreme commander of the alliance has spoken, he
[00:00:16] assures that the organization will ensure that any attack against its
[00:00:20] members is totally in vain, a statement as Trump deals
[00:00:24] with Putin and calls for elections in Ukraine, cold
[00:00:27] in Aubagne near Marseille, a 14-year-old middle school student opened fire in his
[00:00:32] in the deterritorialization of arrested by the school, he fired three times before injuring two people and being arrested,
[00:00:35] he is not known to the police, the investigation is ongoing, Emmanuel Macron
[00:00:38] praises the coolness of the educational team who avoided the
[00:00:41] worst, she is the star of the
[00:00:45] security conditions within 2026 Paris Motor Show, the electric 2CV is presented by Stellantis, a resurrection
[00:00:48] on which the group is counting heavily to weigh against the omnipresent Chinese at the
[00:01:08] teacher who are obviously in France has been targeted by a cyberattack, hundreds of U
[00:01:11] supermarkets, Intermarché, Leclerc have been
[00:01:14] affected, they claim that the
[00:01:16] take care of it, and I am not sure if there isn't computing power of hackers would have remotely triggered the forced defrosting of
[00:01:19] refrigerators, as a result, all
[00:01:21] to debate this control of murder, the Minister of the fresh and frozen products had to be
[00:01:22] Interior and the Minister of discarded, another unclaimed attack at a time when sabotages
[00:01:28] minutes you'll find Stéphanie Antoine who takes you to the heart of of all kinds are multiplying and Moscow is being pointed at, this... the head of NATO's armed forces has spoken,
[00:01:31] an opportunity to show the alliance's muscles in the face of a Russia that was
[00:01:35] never named in the speech
[00:01:37] extract.
[00:01:40] We have neither plans, nor intentions, nor ambitions
[00:01:43] other than the protection of our
[00:01:45] people.
[00:01:49] No one should confuse our defensive posture with
[00:01:52] weakness. However, if anyone were foolish enough to attack
[00:01:56] us, we would fight and prevent them from achieving their objectives.
[00:02:04] I want to make one essential point clear,
[00:02:06] are conquering I do not believe that a conflict is imminent or inevitable.
[00:02:10] That's all for this speech focused on the response to the Russians, while Trump
[00:02:14] signed a deal with Putin on fuel, oil prices
[00:02:18] are at their highest, Brent crude is trading at over $106
[00:02:22] this Monday, a nervousness on the market explained by the
[00:02:25] situation in the Middle East and especially in Saudi Arabia with 14 deaths,
[00:02:29] the kingdom has rarely experienced such a deadly weekend, targeted by the
[00:02:33] Houthi rebels, Riyadh admits to being put to the test. Benjamin de
[00:02:36] institutions will lose control of L'Ombre: passengers waiting calmly
[00:02:40] before boarding when suddenly,
[00:02:43] drone and missile attacks,
[00:02:45] missiles,
[00:02:47] panic
[00:02:50] evaluating them, there was no political will for
[00:02:50] and the development of AI in the heart of Riyadh airport,
[00:02:53] filmed on Saturday, these surveillance camera images have only just been
[00:02:57] released publicly.
[00:03:06] Under attack for 48 hours, which have left 14 dead and more than 300 injured, including a Frenchwoman, Saudi Arabia only authorizes the broadcast of very few images, strikes and
[00:03:09] damage. In Riyadh, the authorities prefer to show the
[00:03:13] visit to the hospital of official officials, checking on the
[00:03:17] injured. It's good, you have everything you
[00:03:20] some progress in the electric need. In addition to Riyadh
[00:03:23] airport, the strikes also
[00:03:26] regulate these American AI giants too much, targeted Dammam and sites of the hydrocarbon giant Aramco. The
[00:03:30] attacks of the Houthi rebellion, allied with Iran, which controls
[00:03:33] eastern Yemen, are unprecedented in over 10 years, this
[00:03:37] morning they announced their intention to retaliate with
[00:03:40] it and keeping control force.
[00:03:47] Our response must be
[00:03:48] just as strong.
[00:03:54] Riyadh also announced that it had intercepted a ballistic missile from
[00:03:58] Yemen last night.
[00:04:00] So the Houthi rebels in Yemen are supported by the Iranians, the
[00:04:04] Iranian regime is accused by London this Monday, two weeks ago,
[00:04:07] remember, a major incident occurred near a military
[00:04:13] speak, between the powers of base in the United Kingdom, 6pm in Paris, headline according to the British Prime Minister, the act
[00:04:16] was almost certainly, he said, directed by the Revolutionary
[00:04:19] Guards, the base in question
[00:04:21] us, so faced with the excesses of is used by the Americans in the context of the conflict with
[00:04:26] capital, that's all for the main Iran. In France, Aubagne middle school students are in shock after a shooting. Inside the Joseph Lacanale school, early this morning, a
[00:04:30] 14-year-old student shot the
[00:04:34] principal of the establishment and a teacher, both were
[00:04:37] injured, the teenager was arrested. Anaïse
[00:04:40] Anket.
[00:04:44] humanity and in the history of Worried glances in front of the Lacanau middle school in Aubagne. Dozens of parents
[00:04:48] are waiting to pick up their children.
[00:04:51] The atmosphere is tense because this morning a student entered
[00:04:54] the establishment, armed with a hunting rifle. He opened fire on
[00:04:58] the principal of the middle school. as well as on a teacher, the
[00:05:02] events took place shortly before 10 am, this mother
[00:05:05] tries to reassure her daughter who is still in the
[00:05:09] building
[00:05:11] when we talked about
[00:05:12] 100% produced by human no one, okay so? don't be afraid, she didn't see it, she saw it, she called me, she told
[00:05:15] me there was a lot of blood in the hallway, she was
[00:05:18] frantic, she saw the blood, she started screaming,
[00:05:22] running, so, the police arrived, they evacuated the first students
[00:05:25] who were in front, the 53-year-old
[00:05:29] principal and the 37-year-old teacher were taken care of by
[00:05:32] emergency services, injured in the legs and lower back, their
[00:05:36] lives are not in danger, the 14-year-old
[00:05:39] boy, a 9th-grade student, unknown to the police, was
[00:05:44] police, according to our information, he was armed with a 12-gauge
[00:05:48] hunting rifle and reportedly fired several times,
[00:05:52] in front of the middle school, angry parents are questioning this morning the
[00:05:57] the establishment,
[00:05:59] how, how is it that the guy got in so easily, I can't
[00:06:03] understand, sir, a 9th-grade student entered the establishment
[00:06:06] with a firearm for reasons that are completely unknown to us,
[00:06:09] this is an act that is not related... to the current
[00:06:13] high school movement, he fired twice hitting the
[00:06:17] principal and a
[00:06:20] hospital but hit in a non-lethal
[00:06:24] way. A psychological unit has been set up to
[00:06:28] support the students, an investigation has also been opened for attempted
[00:06:35] National Education are expected on site
[00:06:38] today.
[00:06:40] Still in France, the temple of tomorrow's car is open, it's the
[00:06:44] beginning of the Paris Motor Show here in Paris, the last one for Emmanuel Macron
[00:06:48] who wandered around this morning meeting the manufacturers, the French, the
[00:06:52] Europeans who are competing with very tough Chinese competition,
[00:06:55] Ludovic de Foucauld, we find you once again, more than a third of the
[00:06:59] exhibitors are Chinese, it's a show of
[00:07:01] strength,
[00:07:04] oh yes, we can say that, and then the impression given by the really gleaming
[00:07:07] Chinese stands is that of a desire to take
[00:07:11] power over... the European flagships, you
[00:07:14] get the impression of seeing Chinese brands that
[00:07:19] Europe, quite simply, there are about twenty
[00:07:22] Chinese manufacturers present at this motor show, there were fewer than
[00:07:26] ten at previous editions and then they don't come to present
[00:07:29] local models, now we are really
[00:07:32] on luxury ranges, premium ranges, for example
[00:07:36] Zicker is present, so that's the high-end
[00:07:39] brand of Guilly, Guilly you know is the... owner of Volvo for
[00:07:43] example so Zicker is 800,000 vehicles delivered since 2021 and
[00:07:47] then there's what you see behind me that's Denza and that's the high-end
[00:07:51] brand of BYD and BYD that we are starting to know or
[00:07:55] recognize on our roads and there you see for example this enormous
[00:07:59] Bao 5 behind me gold color,
[00:08:02] it's discreetly stunning and here we are talking about vehicles at
[00:08:06] 10,000, 11,000 € so we are really hunting on
[00:08:10] the territory of Mercedes BMW Porsche
[00:08:13] and precisely, that's where the contrast is
[00:08:16] striking, BMW Mini and Porsche simply did not
[00:08:20] come to this motor show, it's
[00:08:23] true that Mercedes is present, even if the sales of the
[00:08:26] German manufacturer continue to fall, there is a rebound and
[00:08:32] sector, is it that electrifying
[00:08:35] standard vehicles of the German brand
[00:08:38] like the famous, obviously iconic C-Class, well, isn't it better? than to
[00:08:42] absolutely want to do something new, well, that's perhaps a hypothesis, a lead to explore to try
[00:08:46] to compete, but what we really observe is that the German brands of course, they have
[00:08:50] lost market share in China where the Chinese manufacturers now it's obvious,
[00:08:54] reign supreme, and the Chinese manufacturers come to attack the
[00:09:18] Ludovic, we stay in France with what is left of the Enfants Rouges market
[00:09:22] located in the heart of Paris, it was ravaged by flames last
[00:09:26] night, all the stalls burned, the fire was brought under control at
[00:09:30] dawn, there were no victims, but the loss is immense, it was considered the oldest
[00:09:33] covered food market in the French
[00:09:54] And right now here in Europe, how to keep control over AI, is Europe
[00:09:58] already overwhelmed, the answer with Caroline de Camaret and her
[00:10:01] guests, France 24, LCP,
[00:10:04] public senat
[00:10:05] presents.
[00:10:19] Thank you for joining us in Brussels at the European Parliament for a debate
[00:10:24] intelligence while artificial intelligence is developing
[00:10:28] and promises to revolutionize our daily lives, creating
[00:10:31] opportunities, but also concerns, especially when we
[00:10:34] listen to the statements of the American industry giants,
[00:10:37] for example, this summer, the head of safety of the Anthropic
[00:10:41] group estimated that there was a 10% chance that this
[00:10:45] technology would destroy humanity in the
[00:10:47] coming decade, AIs escaping from their
[00:10:51] manufacturers to colonize sites and then the Australian
[00:10:54] government. it too was hacked, the dangers seem
[00:10:57] multiple. So, the European Union has taken the lead for 2
[00:11:01] years by adopting the European regulation on artificial
[00:11:04] intelligence, a text that prohibits for example manipulating
[00:11:08] users, taking advantage of the vulnerability of
[00:11:11] young people and people with disabilities, it provides for
[00:11:15] fines for companies breaking the law, up to 7% of their turnover,
[00:11:19] but the question of European sovereignty in the face of AI
[00:11:23] arises because the gap has widened. with other global players, Americans
[00:11:26] dominate for example by the number of models put on the market
[00:11:30] 61, three times more than the European Union, the size of
[00:11:33] investments in AI, 600 billion dollars this year, five times more than
[00:11:36] Europe, and even the
[00:11:41] AI, has Europe already lost the race? and
[00:11:46] artificial intelligence, two
[00:11:54] and facing you...
[00:12:25] artificial intelligence becomes more powerful and more autonomous, it could
[00:12:28] evolve faster than our institutions,
[00:12:31] concentrate power in too few hands or make decisions
[00:12:35] that people no longer understand or control,
[00:12:37] as the development of AI automates,
[00:12:40] the progress of artificial intelligence could accelerate
[00:12:44] rapidly, this moment requires extreme
[00:12:47] attention.
[00:12:49] extrême.
[00:12:53] So when you hear the boss of Open AI, do you fear that our states, our
[00:12:57] European democracies in particular, our
[00:13:01] AI? I think there are several things that need to be
[00:13:05] very clear, the first is that the problem is not AI, it's the use
[00:13:08] we will make of it, and the second, and I want to be clear on this point right away, we
[00:13:12] often hear that regulation
[00:13:15] are opposed, so some say yes Europe regulates and so we are unable
[00:13:19] to compete correctly with the Americans and that's why we are losing, Europe is the champion of
[00:13:22] regulation. Let's be clear, the first European regulations were only partially
[00:13:26] implemented this summer, we didn't wait until this summer to
[00:13:30] be behind the Americans, so those who today tell us that it is the fact that
[00:13:33] we regulate, that we want to keep power, that we want to structure
[00:13:37] somewhere a new capacity and which, like any
[00:13:41] capacity, must be framed, that makes no
[00:13:43] sense, so opposing those who say that we must regulate a new
[00:13:47] power and AI is a new power and that
[00:13:50] it would be to oppose one and its very development, that makes no sense, we can be for
[00:13:54] AI and I think AI is a potential and Europe must certainly not fall
[00:13:58] behind and we will come back to that, however that does not prevent us at all, as always when
[00:14:01] there is something powerful, from using
[00:14:05] because we are the master and the slave or the tool is
[00:14:09] AI. David Cormand, do you believe in the coming years in a scenario that makes us think of science fiction
[00:14:13] films with artificial intelligence that would enslave
[00:14:16] humans to the point of eliminating them? no, not at
[00:14:20] all, not at all,
[00:14:24] I think there is an existential risk for our
[00:14:27] civilization, for democracy, for the general
[00:14:30] interest linked to the over-power of these big tech
[00:14:34] companies that decline their power notably through
[00:14:37] AI tools, but I don't believe at all in a
[00:14:40] terminator scenario, I even think that it is a form
[00:14:44] of staging and a diversion, in reality
[00:14:47] our attention from the
[00:14:50] real problem and from what these firms are implementing. you asked the question about
[00:14:54] whether we will keep control? what I want to say with a bit of
[00:14:58] force, is that the economic model of these mega
[00:15:01] firms, you spoke of the amounts of capitalization
[00:15:04] without any common measure in the history of
[00:15:09] capitalism, in fact when you have companies that are capitalized
[00:15:12] at 1000, 2000, 3000 billion dollars, you must
[00:15:16] understand that their viable economic model
[00:15:20] necessarily relies
[00:15:23] obligatorily
[00:15:25] on the grabbing of rights and the questioning of the general interest, for
[00:15:29] example the protection of consumers, for example the
[00:15:32] protection of our data, what I want to tell you is that
[00:15:35] that is the real risk, it is that the economic
[00:15:39] model of these firms, we talk about the Americans, but we could also talk
[00:15:42] about the Chinese, it is to impose an economic model of
[00:15:46] rent over which these firms would have total
[00:15:49] control, that is their economic project, and in this
[00:15:52] matter, AI, I'm talking about the mega AIs like Chat GPT and
[00:15:56] company, that's what we're talking about uh have the project
[00:16:00] of doing that, and so yes, there is a democratic
[00:16:03] requirement to regulate this, and there I completely
[00:16:07] agree with you on the fact that we sometimes confuse
[00:16:10] innovation and progress, okay, innovation is
[00:16:14] something new that we invent, progress is something
[00:16:18] else, progress must be compatible with the general interest, who decides on an
[00:16:22] innovation, scientists, researchers, engineers, who decides that
[00:16:25] it is progress in a democracy, the democratic
[00:16:29] debate, and that's what we need to talk about, progress,
[00:16:32] is the sum of the prosperity created and the
[00:16:35] governance that allows it to be redistributed, that's what somehow
[00:16:39] frames it, that's what progress is, and there I totally agree with what has just been
[00:16:43] said, AI is a tool that must allow us to increase our
[00:16:46] capacity, our productivity, but if it is not framed and not put at the
[00:16:50] service of well-being, AI alone will not
[00:16:54] a desire on the part of these American giants who constantly warn us to
[00:16:57] enhance the power of the AI model on financial markets and to
[00:17:01] discourage the industry. I think there are several elements, the first element is that
[00:17:05] I think they are partly shirking their responsibility. Let's be very, very clear,
[00:17:08] uh whether it's
[00:17:10] Anthropic,
[00:17:12] it's not our fault, let's be very clear, the responsibility
[00:17:16] lies with these companies and they must use enough of the funding
[00:17:19] they have to ensure they keep control of their tool, that's their primary
[00:17:23] responsibility and no one should ever accept them to go back on
[00:17:27] their word in any way, that's true in relation to that, it's also true in relation to the role that
[00:17:30] AI can play globally in our economic balances, we know
[00:17:34] that today if AI captures part of the added value. Let's say 10% of our
[00:17:38] added value, 10% of our gross domestic product, how will we
[00:17:42] ensure tomorrow that we still build a society, have sufficient tax revenue to
[00:17:46] be able to redistribute it, to be able to ensure that common services can be
[00:17:49] paid for, if all of this added value goes to Ireland and
[00:17:53] then to a tax haven and then to the stock market, well
[00:17:56] frankly we risk bringing down our entire social
[00:18:00] model and that's a real danger for solidarity, but when we listen to the President of the
[00:18:03] Commission Ursula von der Leyen, AI is also an economic opportunity to... gain
[00:18:07] in competitiveness, I don't
[00:18:10] think, well it depends on what we call AI, okay, I don't think
[00:18:13] at all that the race, you were talking about a race earlier, to these gigantic
[00:18:17] models as we see them in the United States or in
[00:18:21] China, is a desirable model for all the reasons we've just mentioned, they're smaller in China, huh
[00:18:24] already, no, but they have others, I mean, I put in the same box everything that is
[00:18:28] big tech, in fact in reality the kind of
[00:18:32] imperium and also imperialist vehicles that are online shopping
[00:18:35] platforms and so on and so forth, where there is also data
[00:18:39] capture, where there are also algorithms that aim to better understand
[00:18:43] people to induce them to consume and so on and so forth, it's the
[00:18:46] same logic, this logic is what, and besides it's as old as
[00:18:50] capitalism, I want to tell you, and you talk about the capture of added value, it's a
[00:18:53] fundamental subject but which is also as old as the history of the owners
[00:18:57] of the means of production to use a Marxist lexical field, that's not my
[00:19:01] political school of thought, I'm an ecologist, but that makes you think and so
[00:19:04] always in the history of capitalism there was the will... on the part of a certain
[00:19:08] number of captains of industry to build monopolies that
[00:19:12] capture for them the added value, the
[00:19:16] productivity, for me big tech and AI, it's a
[00:19:19] new level in this direction, but with a capacity to
[00:19:23] control our economies and even our democracies, you were talking earlier about
[00:19:27] taxation, that's something essential, these firms have
[00:19:30] found a way to escape
[00:19:33] taxation, they are somehow escaping the common rule, they are
[00:19:36] replacing... the sovereign role of states, strategic infrastructures
[00:19:40] including military, the fact of having access to the personal data of
[00:19:44] citizens, that's what is hitting us and in the history
[00:19:47] of the power dynamic, so to
[00:19:50] money and the economy and the general interest, there has never
[00:19:54] been such a huge imbalance as what is happening to
[00:19:59] artificial intelligence, the European Union took the lead
[00:20:03] in 2024 by adopting a European regulation on artificial
[00:20:06] intelligence, a text that classifies AI models by risk
[00:20:10] level, which prohibits deceiving people from using their
[00:20:13] vulnerability and adds transparency obligations to companies
[00:20:17] that develop these models under penalty of fines, a regulation
[00:20:21] adopted urgently that the President of the European Commission defends,
[00:20:25] let's listen:
[00:20:28] the European regulation on artificial intelligence is of course a key
[00:20:31] piece of the safeguards we want to put in place, and thanks to it,
[00:20:35] Europe is able to shape... efforts at the global
[00:20:38] level. We will therefore collaborate with our like-minded
[00:20:42] partners such as Canada and the United Kingdom. We
[00:20:45] want to team up on model evaluation, verification,
[00:20:50] artificial intelligence and much more. This regulation
[00:20:54] was adopted 2 years ago, but there is a
[00:20:58] full-speed race in the development of artificial intelligence models, is it not
[00:21:02] already obsolete? Well, it is not yet fully in application and so there is
[00:21:05] still a lot of work to be done and as I told you, I think we absolutely must do it,
[00:21:09] it is a necessity, but perhaps to come back to what was said
[00:21:12] before, what do we realize somewhere with AI? We
[00:21:16] realize that there is an acceleration in the disembodiment. economy, that is
[00:21:22] the economy, we come from an agricultural economy, there when
[00:21:26] it's quite simple, you have a field and you can touch it, then you have an industrial
[00:21:29] economy, you can still more or less touch it, then you have a digital
[00:21:32] economy which knows no borders and so the great
[00:21:35] civilizational question, I mean we are really at a turning point in
[00:21:39] civilization and to know if in these models we will be able
[00:21:42] to recreate somewhere a public authority that will have control
[00:21:46] over these models that somehow you couldn't touch and so they have an
[00:21:50] ease, a capacity to avoid all regulations,
[00:21:53] taxation, solidarity, to be concentrated in the hands of a few,
[00:21:57] and that is really the problem we see, we know and that makes our
[00:22:00] finances in which this famous AI doing a bit of
[00:22:03] pedagogy and especially the AI companies that would not
[00:22:07] respect therefore all these regulations prohibiting
[00:22:10] socially rating individuals from using
[00:22:13] in real time their biometric data and so on and so forth
[00:22:16] would face fines that... can go up to 7% of their global
[00:22:20] turnover, does that give us the means to
[00:22:23] really see what is happening in the development of these AI models
[00:22:27] and especially to sufficiently regulate them for our citizens, in your desire
[00:22:31] to do pedagogy, you are right to do it, the European Union during the last mandate,
[00:22:34] I insist on this point, it was the last mandate, many things
[00:22:38] have changed with this new mandate, talked a lot about the
[00:22:41] green deal, that was very good, 65, 70
[00:22:45] useful legislations, and made several... fundamental texts
[00:22:48] on tech, AI Act, data
[00:22:52] Act, DSA, Digital Service Act, DMA, Digital Market
[00:22:55] Act, these four have a logic
[00:22:59] texts, it was about structuring a line of defense and
[00:23:03] regulation in the name of our standards, as you said earlier, not to please
[00:23:07] ourselves, it's not regulated because we are fools and wouldn't be able to
[00:23:10] innovate, it's that we say we have values, we express these values through
[00:23:14] standards, and all companies that want to access the world's largest
[00:23:17] market, which we are, must. these standards
[00:23:20] conform to our values, there is nothing restrictive
[00:23:24] or anti-innovation in that, it's about respecting our fundamental values, respecting human rights,
[00:23:27] etc., and therefore had hierarchized AIs at
[00:23:31] risk by saying there are those that are very risky, those that are moderately
[00:23:34] risky, etc. etc. with different protocols for
[00:23:40] it, the AI made a first line of defense which, from my point of
[00:23:43] view, is embryonic, that we don't have the validity, that's where I'm angry
[00:23:47] with Landeryan who in fact deplores the
[00:23:52] big speech saying "we are going to agree with
[00:23:55] Canada, with Great Britain", at the same time, what does she
[00:23:59] do? she prostrates herself before Trump with the EU
[00:24:02] US agreement, she is making omnibus, the omnibus and the
[00:24:05] regulations that are coming back to these regulatory defense lines that we haven't even
[00:24:09] started to apply, we are questioning them, and so at some point we need to know
[00:24:13] where we want to go. Ivan Verofstrat, if we
[00:24:16] aren't we risking a new showdown with Trump who
[00:24:20] absolutely doesn't want to regulate them, and we know the trade wars he can lead us into,
[00:24:24] he was pictured with all the big bosses of
[00:24:28] AI saying no no, it's great there will be a code of conduct
[00:24:31] and everything will be fine, I'll tell you if it annoys Donald Trump,
[00:24:35] that's perhaps another reason to do it, you know, on his cap
[00:24:38] it doesn't say "make Europe great again", it says "make America
[00:24:42] or make my friends great again", so I don't think his
[00:24:45] objective is really to take care of our common good, so if it annoys Donald
[00:24:48] Trump, we have nothing to worry about, if I may use the expression,
[00:24:52] today the United States needs us, it needs a commission that is much stronger
[00:24:56] that stands up and is also capable of threatening Donald Trump back by
[00:24:59] telling him you know, we have 300 billion euros that will make your financial
[00:25:03] markets, we buy your digital services,
[00:25:06] today they pay almost no taxes here, we have enough leverage to
[00:25:10] negotiate with someone like Donald Trump, we must stop being afraid, but just to come back to DSA
[00:25:13] DMA, it is absolutely correct, it has put in place legislations, my
[00:25:17] tragedy is where I can join the anger that... partly concerning the commission
[00:25:21] today, is that a legislation without sanction, it's like wind without
[00:25:24] sail, today, the sanctions that are taken, they are too slow, too
[00:25:28] weak, we do investigations for 6 months, 1 year, 2 years,
[00:25:32] 3 years, 3 years in tech, 3 years is an eternity, these are centuries in tech,
[00:25:36] so today these legislations, if they want to be
[00:25:39] credible, we apply them with much more rigor, including sanctions, one last
[00:25:42] consideration with you
[00:25:45] Mr. Corman, the climate in all of that, by next
[00:25:48] year, global demand for AI will lead to a consumption of 5
[00:25:52] billion cubic meters of water, that's more than the
[00:25:55] annual consumption of Denmark, do you say stop AI then for environmentalists,
[00:26:01] ecological transition and moreover she is a specialist of Van der Leyen, she made the link
[00:26:05] with the transition, the digital revolution as if the
[00:26:08] two didn't fit together at all, moreover I have here
[00:26:12] in this house ordered the first report on the environmental cost of the
[00:26:15] value chain and production of digital specifically in
[00:26:19] 2020 and which already showed that it's a disaster and it has
[00:26:22] worsened since, you know there's a whole lexical field of tech and
[00:26:26] clouds, unicorns, all that would be immaterial, no, it
[00:26:29] relies on extremely material infrastructures. and that's what you
[00:26:33] evoke, water and energy consumption, moreover Emmanuel
[00:26:36] Macron loves it, he's going to say I'll finally be able to do something with my nuclear
[00:26:39] power plants, I'm going to connect them to huge foreign,
[00:26:43] extra-European data centers and it will be a formidable business model, all
[00:26:47] of this is a disaster because all electricity, including nuclear, I'm not for
[00:26:51] nuclear, that you use for these cursed data centers, you
[00:26:55] don't use them for the decarbonization of our economy and so you remain
[00:26:58] dependent on American or other fossil
[00:27:01] fuels and so this is one of the additional problems posed
[00:27:04] by big tech and
[00:27:30] the news, see you tomorrow.
[00:30:07] Good evening everyone and welcome to the heart of the news on France 24, it's
[00:30:12] news, Saudi Arabia recognizes that the kingdom is under
[00:30:15] strain after the series of deadly attacks by the Houthis, notably
[00:30:19] against Riyadh airport, a series of attacks that left
[00:30:23] 18 dead and hundreds of injured, we'll talk about it with
[00:30:26] Bruno Darouf, good evening Bruno, good evening
[00:30:28] Stéphanie, Voladimir Zelensky judges from
[00:30:32] now on that it's clear that Russia rejects the energy truce announced
[00:30:36] unilaterally by Trump, Russian attacks have multiplied in recent
[00:30:40] hours in Ukraine. We will therefore find our
[00:30:44] correspondent Gulliver Cragg.
[00:30:47] French politics with the victory of Raphael Glucksman, who is now
[00:30:51] the social democratic candidate for the presidential election. He
[00:30:54] largely won the PS and Place Publique primary with 66% of the votes
[00:30:58] in the first round.