GEONEWS — broadcast
20260806 063000 UTC
375 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:44] I think,
[00:01:30] no sample was taken. The report mentions that the entry wound,
[00:01:33] meaning the internal wound, was blackened, but no sample
[00:01:37] was taken for chemical confirmation. The scalp was not removed for examination of the skull,
[00:01:41] and the skull and neck were not opened for internal examination.
[00:01:45] According to the letter, neither a scale was used
[00:01:48] to measure the wounds caused by a firearm, i.e., a pistol bullet,
[00:01:52] nor were photographs taken.
[00:01:55] investigating. The most important point is The prominent bone marks on the entry and exit wounds
[00:01:59] recorded by the MLO
[00:02:07] freedom. Let me require confirmation and re-examination. impartial plebiscite under the auspices of Additionally, the trajectory of the bullet,
[00:02:11] meaning its path, inside the body was not explained.
[00:02:14] Similarly, correct photographs of the wounds
[00:02:17] according to forensic principles are not available.
[00:02:21] According to the letter, the nature and extent
[00:02:25] of decomposition of various body
[00:02:27] process will come forward. But along with this process, parts have not been accurately described. Due to the impossibility of facial recognition,
[00:04:00] this work was not done. This post-mortem
[00:04:02] that report is raising more questions than it is giving answers. The father is saying
[00:04:06] that he was tortured. There are marks on the body.
[00:04:10] If you look at the pictures, there is black skin on the hand,
[00:04:14] which is called skin slippage. Swabs were necessary.
[00:04:17] By taking swabs, we could have found out the reason for the blackening.
[00:04:21] I have a very big dissent with this report that
[00:04:24] I do not agree with the findings that he has given. Let me assume for a moment that the
[00:04:28] entry wound is the same,
[00:06:12] it is going that about 12 people, including two brothers,
[00:06:16] have been gathered. The people from whom Ameer Raza Ali
[00:06:19] asked for money from different places at different times
[00:06:23] and at different timings. A screenshot has also been obtained by the police
[00:06:27] in which a message is sent on July 25,
[00:06:31] rupees are demanded, and it is said that I will increase
[00:06:35] it further and return the money. It means that Mir Raza
[00:06:38] Ali was not worried about money in those one or two days.
[00:06:42] If this amount is being demanded on July 25,
[00:06:46] and its screenshot is found, then he goes missing on July 29,
[00:06:50] and he goes, and all the CCTV footage comes out. So these messages
[00:06:54] must have been going to different people for four or five days.
[00:06:57] In the form of a PDF, a list from his Apple Watch
[00:07:00] has been obtained by the police. The police are ready to investigate
[00:07:04] all these people and are already
[00:07:08] that the person who picks up garbage, his CCTV footage
[00:07:11] and his route are being determined, and in this regard, it is being checked
[00:07:15] whether that person who was picking up garbage went. It is highly possible that the
[00:07:19] additional IG Karachi is also saying that the weapon might have been picked up from there by that person.
[00:07:22] If that person is found and that weapon is found, then the police investigation will be largely
[00:07:26] clear. But then the question will remain, what does the medical report
[00:07:30] say? So for the medical report, if a re-medical examination is to be done,
[00:07:33] then the power of a magistrate will be needed. The magistrate will order
[00:07:39] it is very important to know this. The most important
[00:08:12] will meet his royal highness, Prince Mohammad bin Salman bin Abdul
[00:08:16] Aziz al Saud, the Crown Prince and the Prime Minister of Saudi
[00:08:19] Arabia. Discussion will focus on
[00:08:23] consolidating the Pakistan-Saudi Arabia bilateral
[00:08:26] relationships as well as exchange of views
[00:08:30] on areas of regional and international developments of
[00:08:33] mutual interest. The visit marks Pakistan's
[00:08:37] long-standing partnership with the Kingdom of Saudi
[00:08:39] Arabia anchored in decades of mutual
[00:08:43] trust, cooperation and
[00:08:45] brotherhood, although taking place against the
[00:08:49] backdrop of height and tensions in the Gulf. The
[00:08:52] visit will carry immense significance
[00:08:55] beyond the immediate crisis and short-term
[00:08:59] considerations. It will further strengthen bilateral
[00:09:02] relations, deepen strategic cooperation,
[00:09:05] enhance coordination on regional and international issues of
[00:09:09] mutual interest, and also reinforce
[00:09:12] multilateral cooperation.
[00:09:15] Ladies and gentlemen, Pakistan remained engaged alongside with
[00:09:19] brotherly countries in our sincere efforts to resolve the
[00:09:23] crisis in the Gulf and the Middle East, especially with
[00:09:26] respect to the standoff in the Strait of
[00:09:29] Hormuz. As a littoral state, overlooking
[00:09:32] Strait of Hormuz and the Gulf,
[00:09:35] Oman has, let me, let us add that
[00:09:38] Oman has consistently played a very constructive role in
[00:09:42] promoting regional peace and stability. Pakistan
[00:09:45] acknowledges and deeply appreciates Oman's valuable
[00:09:48] contribution in its steadfast efforts to further to
[00:09:52] foster de-escalation and peaceful
[00:09:54] coexistence. Pakistan will continue to actively
[00:09:58] pursue diplomatic engagements and support all sincere
[00:10:01] efforts aimed at achieving
[00:10:04] a comprehensive, just, and lasting
[00:10:07] resolution to this conflict.
[00:10:11] And in the same way, and in the context of our ongoing
[00:10:14] efforts, on the 30th of July, the foreign the
[00:10:18] Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister held an important telephone
[00:10:22] conversation with the Foreign Minister of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
[00:10:28] They exchanged views on regional developments including the situation in
[00:10:32] the Red Sea, Bab al-Mandab, and as well as in
[00:10:35] Palestine. And on June 3rd, and on
[00:10:39] August 2026, the Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister held a
[00:10:43] telephone conversation with the Foreign Minister of the Islamic Republic of
[00:10:46] Iran, Sayyad Abbas Arakchi. The two leaders
[00:10:49] discussed regional and international developments, including the
[00:10:53] deteriorating situation in the occupied Palestinian territories
[00:10:57] in East Jerusalem. The DPM also invited the
[00:11:01] Foreign Minister of Iran to visit
[00:11:03] Pakistan.
[00:11:05] Ladies and gentlemen, this week the Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign
[00:11:09] Minister undertook an important visit to
[00:11:11] Jordan, at the invitation of the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister
[00:11:15] of Foreign Affairs of Jordan, Mr. Amman Safadi.
[00:11:18] The DPM visited
[00:11:22] Jordan. Most of his activities
[00:11:25] on the 5th of August to
[00:11:28] participate in the ministerial meeting on
[00:11:31] Jerusalem. So this was the primary purpose. The meeting brought
[00:11:33] together Arab League member states and selected
[00:11:37] Islamic countries to coordinate a unified
[00:11:40] response to the deteriorating situation in the
[00:11:44] occupied Jerusalem. Pakistan's participation
[00:11:47] reaffirmed our steadfast support for the Palestinian
[00:11:50] people and its commitment to the establishment of an
[00:11:53] independent, sovereign, and continuous state of Palestine
[00:11:56] as per 19th, 1967
[00:12:00] borders with Al-Quds Sharif as
[00:12:03] its capital. On the sidelines of the meeting, the Deputy Prime
[00:12:07] Minister, Foreign Minister held bilateral meetings with the Foreign Minister of
[00:12:11] Jordan, Turkey, Egypt, Algeria, Iraq,
[00:12:14] and Somalia. The foreign ministers of our four
[00:12:18] countries, R4, as you know, ladies and gentlemen, is a grouping of four countries
[00:12:22] comprising Pakistan,
[00:12:26] Turkey, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia. So these
[00:12:29] foreign ministers of these four countries met for the fifth
[00:12:32] time since the inception of this
[00:12:36] group. The meeting took place in Jordan on the 5th of
[00:12:39] August. The ministers reaffirmed their
[00:12:42] unwavering support for the inalienable right of the
[00:12:45] Palestinian people, including their right to self-
[00:12:48] determination and the establishment of an independent, sovereign Palestinian
[00:12:52] state. They stressed that a comprehensive and
[00:12:56] lasting resolution of the Palestinian question
[00:12:59] remains essential for achieving durable peace and
[00:13:02] stability in the Middle East. The ministers
[00:13:05] also reviewed the regional situation and underscored the importance of
[00:13:09] continued consultation, close coordination, and
[00:13:12] diplomacy to promote regional peace, security,
[00:13:15] stability, and de-escalation.
[00:13:19] Another important development, ladies and gentlemen, this week was the
[00:13:23] fourth round of Pakistan-US counter-terrorism
[00:13:26] dialogue. This
[00:13:29] was convened in
[00:13:31] Washington D.C. this week.
[00:13:35] Ambassador Nabil Munir, Special Secretary of UN, led our delegation. The
[00:13:39] dialogue underscored shared interest
[00:13:42] of the US-Pakistan sides
[00:13:46] on counter-terrorism partnership and
[00:13:49] the determination of the two countries to confront terrorism.
[00:13:53] Delegates exchanged views on the current threat environment, explored
[00:13:57] avenues of enhanced collaboration, and discussed
[00:14:00] steps to further strengthen border security
[00:14:03] and disrupt terrorist facilitation
[00:14:07] networks across the region. The United
[00:14:11] States and Pakistan reaffirmed their
[00:14:14] joint resolve to confront terrorist
[00:14:16] organizations that endanger the safety of their citizens and the
[00:14:20] stability of the region, specifically
[00:14:23] including ISIS.
[00:14:35] Ladies and gentlemen, this week Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Australia held
[00:14:38] two important dialogues. One was the official talks, this is a kind
[00:14:42] of a bilateral political consultation
[00:14:46] at the senior officials level, and the second was the Joint Trade Committee meeting in
[00:14:50] Canberra. This was on the 4th of August. The two
[00:14:53] sides reviewed the full spectrum of bilateral relations and discussed
[00:14:57] ways to enhance cooperation in political,
[00:15:00] economic, trade, security, and regional domains. Both
[00:15:03] countries reaffirmed their commitment to further strengthening their
[00:15:07] bilateral partnership. And
[00:15:09] finally, we all
[00:15:11] celebrated,
[00:15:14] commemorated, observed
[00:15:17] it marking the fifth, the seventh anniversary
[00:15:20] of India's illegal and unilateral action
[00:15:23] of 5th August
[00:15:26] 2019 in the Indian illegally occupied Jammu and
[00:15:29] Kashmir. Pakistan reaffirmed its unwavering
[00:15:32] support for the Kashmiri people's inalienable right to self-
[00:15:35] determination in accordance with the relevant UN
[00:15:39] Security Council resolutions. So with this,
[00:15:42] ladies and gentlemen, I conclude my opening remarks and open the
[00:15:45] floor for question
[00:15:47] answers.
[00:15:55] Thanks. So you have seen the
[00:15:57] reaction by the
[00:16:01] Indian
[00:16:04] on the ongoing process of elections.
[00:16:12] Yes, we have seen those statements.
[00:16:15] Pakistan categorically rejects the baseless
[00:16:18] and politically motivated remarks
[00:16:21] by the Indian Ministry for Ministry of External Affairs regarding the
[00:16:25] ongoing legislative assembly elections in Azad
[00:16:29] Jammu and Kashmir. It is
[00:16:31] unsurprising that India has chosen to issue
[00:16:35] such remarks on the eve of the seventh anniversary of its
[00:16:38] illegal and unilateral actions of 5th August, through which
[00:16:42] it sought, it it seeks to alter the internationally
[00:16:46] recognized disputed status of Jammu and
[00:16:49] Kashmir. These statements, those actions
[00:16:53] were a fragrant violation of the relevant Security Council
[00:16:56] resolutions, international law, and India's own international
[00:17:00] commitments. The elections in
[00:17:04] the 13th Legislative Assembly of Azad Jammu and Kashmir
[00:17:08] are being conducted in a peaceful, transparent, and orderly manner in
[00:17:11] accordance with the constitutional and legal framework
[00:17:15] governing the AJK. They reflect
[00:17:18] democratic aspirations and
[00:17:21] political will of the people of Azad Jammu and
[00:17:24] Kashmir. India has neither the legal standing
[00:17:28] nor the moral authority to
[00:17:30] comment to comment on the democratic process in
[00:17:34] AJK while it continues to deny the people
[00:17:37] of Indian illegally occupied Kashmir, the
[00:17:40] fundamental political rights and democratic
[00:17:45] add that no amount of misinformation or
[00:17:48] propaganda can alter the legal and historical reality that Jammu and
[00:17:52] Kashmir remains an internationally recognized disputed
[00:17:55] territory, and its final disposition is to be determined in
[00:17:59] accordance with the relevant United Nations Security Council
[00:18:02] resolutions as well as the freely expressed will of the
[00:18:06] Kashmiri people through UN-administered
[00:18:09] plebiscite. India's attempt to
[00:18:13] invoke misleading casualty figures cannot
[00:18:16] obscure its own well- documented record of serious
[00:18:20] and systematic human rights violations in
[00:18:23] Indian illegally occupied Jammu, and these include, and
[00:18:27] are well-documented, including extrajudicial killings, arbitrary
[00:18:31] detentions, enforced disappearances, collective punishment,
[00:18:34] and restriction of fundamental freedoms
[00:18:38] and significantly altering the
[00:18:41] demographic composition in the occupied
[00:18:44] territories in contravention to international
[00:18:48] law. So such statements are clearly intended to deflect international
[00:18:51] attention from India's continued
[00:18:55] violation of international human rights and humanitarian
[00:18:58] law, as well as its persistent
[00:19:01] failure to fulfill international
[00:19:03] obligations. Pakistan would therefore reiterate
[00:19:07] its call on India to reverse the illegal
[00:19:10] actions, create an environment conducive to
[00:19:13] a peaceful settlement of the issue of Jammu and
[00:19:16] Kashmir in accordance with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions.
[00:19:31] I wanted to ask if Pakistan has had any official contact for
[00:19:35] information with Bangladesh.
[00:19:38] The US ambassador addressed the
[00:19:42] son, there were some comments made about
[00:19:44] Pakistan. Have we had any issues with
[00:19:48] that or are we still and internally for
[00:19:52] Bangladesh? Well, of course,
[00:19:55] our diplomatic engagement with Bangladesh continues. So
[00:19:59] they are not, they are not bound by one single
[00:20:02] event. They are bound or constrained by one single
[00:20:06] event. So I'm sure the
[00:20:08] diplomatic engagement between the two sides through
[00:20:12] normal diplomatic channels in Dhaka and Islamabad
[00:20:15] are continuing and we are aware of the developments
[00:20:19] particularly with reference to the event
[00:20:22] yesterday.
[00:20:25] We do not interfere
[00:20:28] in the internal affairs of other countries and as
[00:20:32] such we do not have any comment to
[00:20:34] offer. The fact that this statement was made from
[00:20:38] India is a matter between those two
[00:20:41] countries, Bangladesh and India. Let me add
[00:20:44] that the people of Bangladesh are fully capable to
[00:20:47] resolve their issues independently without
[00:20:50] external interference. We
[00:20:53] respect their sovereign choices and will continue to
[00:20:57] cooperate with them in the journey towards progress and prosperity.
[00:21:11] Thanks. Also, the
[00:21:13] Indian spokesperson has
[00:21:16] usually rejected these
[00:21:20] comments made by the minister minister
[00:21:23] on
[00:21:26] yesterday.
[00:21:34] Yes, we saw the statement issued this
[00:21:36] morning
[00:21:39] by the Indian MEA. We categorically reject the
[00:21:43] statements and its self-serving eulogy
[00:21:46] of India's illegal actions of 5th August 2019.
[00:21:50] Indian leadership has been expressing this self-serving
[00:21:53] eulogy of India's
[00:21:56] actions. No unilateral action by India nor any
[00:22:00] amount of rhetoric can alter the internationally recognized disputed
[00:22:04] status of Jammu and Kashmir or deny the people
[00:22:07] of Jammu and Kashmir
[00:22:10] their inalienable right under international law and relevant
[00:22:14] Security Council resolutions. The reality in India and illegally occupied
[00:22:18] Jammu and Kashmir is that a prolonged and heavy
[00:22:22] military presence,
[00:22:25] coupled with draconian laws, continues to
[00:22:27] facilitate demographic change aimed at
[00:22:31] altering the territory's Muslim majority, the territories'
[00:22:34] Muslim majority character.
[00:22:37] At the same time, systemic efforts persist to
[00:22:41] suppress the voices of Kashmiri people and erase their
[00:22:44] distinct identity. The claims of so-called development
[00:22:48] cannot substitute for the inalienable right of the
[00:22:52] people of Jammu and Kashmir to determine their own future through a free and
[00:22:57] the United Nations in accordance with the UN Security Council
[00:23:01] resolutions. So we remain unwavering in our
[00:23:04] support for the just struggle of the people of Jammu and Kashmir, and we call
[00:23:08] upon India to reverse its illegal and unilateral
[00:23:12] measures and its human rights violation and engage in the peaceful
[00:23:16] resolution of Jammu and Kashmir in accordance with the
[00:23:52] We will take a break here. The issues of Karachi,
[00:23:55] the biggest city, have become so bad.
[00:23:59] And overall, the governance of the PPP government in Sindh
[00:24:03] is raising so many questions that
[00:24:06] if Karachi is not made a separate unit,
[00:24:10] the problem will not be solved. So here, I think there can be a very big
[00:24:14] fight between the PPP and the system. And Aamin
[00:24:17] Sahib, when you talked about the system, See, Shahzeb Sahib, this is a very interesting
[00:24:50] question you have asked.
[00:24:54] If you look at the founding chairman of Tehreek-e-Insaf,
[00:24:57] who is currently in jail, if you look at his
[00:25:01] old statements, you will know.
[00:25:05] You will get the answer to your question. Imran
[00:25:08] Khan Sahib is not only a supporter
[00:25:11] of administrative units,
[00:25:14] but also a proponent of creating new provinces.
[00:25:17] In fact, I have heard him say
[00:25:20] that he is also a supporter of the presidential system. So for now, put aside
[00:25:24] the debate about the presidential system. But it is a great
[00:25:27] coincidence, you can call it a pleasant coincidence
[00:25:31] or a very inappropriate coincidence,
[00:25:34] that there is not much difference
[00:25:37] between the opinion of Mohsin Naqvi Sahib and Imran Khan Sahib
[00:25:41] on the issue of administrative units. This is a very important
[00:25:45] point. That is, this is such an important
[00:25:48] issue, whether it is administrative units or new provinces,
[00:25:52] that the differences between Imran Khan Sahib
[00:25:56] and the institutions will end. This is such an important issue.
[00:25:58] No,
[00:26:01] I don't think it's that easy. I just answered your question
[00:26:04] that if Tehreek-e-Insaf
[00:26:08] wants, it can create space because
[00:26:11] Imran Khan Sahib has supported new administrative
[00:26:15] units in the past. Well, on the issue of new
[00:26:18] administrative units, the current federal cabinet
[00:26:21] does not have a single opinion.
[00:26:24] You must have seen that in the past few days, in three or four days, many
[00:26:28] federal ministers are supporting new administrative units.
[00:26:32] And
[00:26:43] I also know of other people who are supporting this. So on this issue, the opinion of Shehbaz Sharif Sahib and Nawaz Sharif Sahib is,
[00:26:47] a minority opinion within PML-N,
[00:26:50] because the majority of PML-N right now
[00:26:53] is a majority.
[00:26:56] If you look at who was in which party
[00:27:00] before and how they came to PML-N, then
[00:27:04] when you go into this background, you will know
[00:27:07] that it might happen that in this matter,
[00:27:11] the Prime Minister Sahib
[00:27:29] the voice of your feelings.
[00:27:42] Far from home, the voice of the homeland and your
[00:27:45] identity, Ambassador Pakistan, with a team of confident
[00:27:48] representatives, Ambassador Pakistan, first and
[00:27:52] foremost.
[00:27:52] Ambassador
[00:27:56] Pakistani
[00:27:57] Pakistani
[00:28:01] Pakistani
[00:30:14] President Trump rejected reports of a shortage of American weapons stockpiles.
[00:30:18] Accused leakers of treason, threatened to punish them.
[00:30:21] American and British media had reported a shortage
[00:30:25] of missiles for the defense system that destroys enemy missiles.
[00:30:29] In a statement on social media, Trump rejected these reports and said,
[00:30:32] "America has a large number of ammunition and specific
[00:30:36] types of weapons. Weapons are being mass-produced
[00:30:40] and sent to America as needed. Defense companies are setting up
[00:30:43] the highest number of plants and factories in the country's history."
[00:30:46] Shortage of weapons for war against
[00:30:54] Iran.