HALKTV — Bilge Yurtdagulen ile Gundem Ozel 20260915 210000 UTC 4016 transcript segments Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record. [00:00:01] days. Let's listen, let's remember, those were good days, weren't they? [00:00:05] Let's remember, those were good days, weren't they? [00:00:08] Let's remember, those were good days, weren't they? [00:00:12] Let's remember, those were good days, weren't they? [00:00:15] Let's remember, [00:00:16] right? [00:00:20] Friends, [00:00:27] look, esteemed council members. We all [00:00:30] have families. Allah makes a servant rich, [00:00:34] and poor, He can bring them down and lift them up. [00:00:37] Mocking someone's situation, making fun of them, trying [00:00:41] to belittle someone, asking "where is your wife, where is your husband?" [00:00:44] is not fitting for a human, it's shameful, it's immoral, [00:00:48] it's immoral. What do you mean "where is your husband?" [00:00:51] Who are you to ask such a question? Friends, [00:00:55] friends, as the Deputy Mayor of the Metropolitan [00:00:58] Municipality... While managing [00:01:02] this council from this podium, I do not find it [00:01:05] ethical or correct for a woman [00:01:08] to speak to another woman in this way, [00:01:11] or to ask such a question in 2026. [00:01:13] I apologize to all women, [00:01:16] as the Deputy Mayor, as the Deputy Mayor of Istanbul Metropolitan [00:01:20] Municipality. I wish it hadn't happened, [00:01:23] but I'm very sad, [00:01:25] friends. Can we restart, dear [00:01:28] Murat? [00:01:50] Why is she asking? What does it have to do with her husband or wife? What does she mean [00:01:53] by "where is your husband?" What kind of level is this? Ekrem [00:01:57] İmamoğlu was acquitted twice in a case. He was penalized [00:02:00] for saying "discourteous." This is not something that should be shoved in our faces [00:02:04] so much in this country. A municipal council member comes out and asks another municipal council [00:02:08] member, "where is your husband?" Can something like this happen? [00:02:11] Do we have to witness this? [00:02:15] You know, we used to say, [00:02:18] "manners, please!" [00:02:22] She says "where is your husband?" I don't even understand why she said it, but I understood [00:02:26] from Nuri Bey's words that anything can happen to [00:02:29] a person in life, they might have separated [00:02:32] from their spouse, even if they separated, [00:02:35] even if they didn't, what's it to you? [00:02:38] What kind of impoliteness is this? What kind of thing is this? [00:02:42] It's unbelievable. A municipal council member is shouting "where is your husband?" to another [00:02:45] municipal council member. [00:02:48] Ms. Sinem, do you know what's even more regrettable? [00:02:51] What we've been talking about, look, if a municipal [00:02:55] council member from the AK Party [00:02:59] had said the same words to a woman, [00:03:02] believe me, all the spokespeople of the government today would not have said [00:03:06] anything, not even Mr. Şükrü. No, no, [00:03:09] no, of course, [00:03:13] it's not acceptable, she shouldn't have said it, but if she had said it, [00:03:16] all the spokespeople of the government today, [00:03:19] from top to bottom, all of them would have made [00:03:23] the harshest statements, and most likely an investigation [00:03:26] would have been launched regarding that municipal council [00:03:30] member. So, the municipal council, which is the highest [00:03:34] authority in Istanbul, where 16 million people live, [00:03:37] where investments worth millions of liras are decided, [00:03:41] like everyone else, when I and where all kinds of issues related to municipalities are discussed, [00:03:44] is where these 16 million people, regardless of their party, [00:03:47] elected these people to represent them, to make decisions concerning [00:03:51] them while they live in their city. But you ask, [00:03:55] "where is your husband? Where is your wife?" These questions really [00:03:58] lower the level [00:04:01] to such an extent. It's an insult who elected you there. She's raising [00:04:05] her hand like this, pointing her finger, "your husband is where my husband is." [00:04:09] What is this? I'm on screen, so I'm really trying [00:04:13] to restrain myself, but as you said, the first people [00:04:16] to condemn this should be the AK Party council members, [00:04:20] above all else. We all say that family [00:04:23] is sacred. It's above politics, [00:04:27] it's above business. Making such accusations [00:04:31] about anyone's family, especially in a council where such decisions [00:04:34] are made, is truly unacceptable. Moreover, [00:04:38] as Mr. Şükrü just said, if it were the opposite scenario, [00:04:42] we would be talking about completely different things. Perhaps an investigation, [00:04:46] an arrest, all channels would be saying this and that. [00:04:49] Look, maybe no one else is talking about this right now, [00:04:53] and we're talking about a great shame committed by a lady [00:05:12] Friends, [00:05:18] look, esteemed council members. We all [00:05:21] have families. Allah makes a servant rich, [00:05:24] and poor, He can bring them down and lift them up. [00:05:28] Mocking someone's situation, making fun of them, trying [00:05:32] to belittle someone, asking "where is your wife, where is your husband?" [00:05:35] is not fitting for a human, it's shameful, it's immoral, [00:05:39] it's immoral. What do you mean "where is your husband?" [00:05:42] Who are you to ask such a question? Friends, [00:05:45] friends, as the Deputy Mayor of the Metropolitan [00:05:49] Municipality, from this podium, [00:05:51] yes, [00:05:55] she says she would say it again if it happened again. [00:05:57] The woman [00:06:01] who was shown, the council member who was insulted, [00:06:04] is indeed an attorney, [00:06:07] and the one who said it, Özden Bilgiş, is an AK Party [00:06:10] IMM council member. But the one shown in the video, [00:06:14] our colleague, the lawyer who was insulted, [00:06:18] is Tuğba Çalık. The one who said "where is your husband?" [00:06:21] is Özden Bilgiş, and the one who was insulted [00:06:25] is Tuğba Çalık. So Tuğba Hanım was the one who was insulted. [00:06:28] Yes, Tuğba Hanım. Okay, I understand. [00:06:31] Yes. Were you going to say something? [00:06:34] As I said, no matter what position [00:06:38] you hold, no matter where you are elected, I don't think [00:06:41] anyone has the right to ask such a question, either [00:06:45] in politics or in humanity. First and foremost, [00:06:49] I repeat, I think AK Party and Nationalist Movement Party [00:06:52] members should condemn this, because politics should not [00:06:56] stoop so low, so beneath [00:06:59] the ground, in my opinion. [00:07:02] Mr. Ercüment, you remained silent, but the issue here is not [00:07:06] a woman yelling at another woman, it presents a general [00:07:09] picture. I mean, this municipal council... [00:07:13] We saw it, where did we first [00:07:16] see it? Before Üsküdar changed, in that municipality, [00:07:19] the council fight. Özgür Çelik on one side, AK Party members [00:07:23] on the other. He's yelling at her, "come here, journalist! Come, come this way!" [00:07:26] He's telling our Gamze, "council [00:07:29] members, come, come here, speak here," and so on. What kind [00:07:32] of tone, what kind of style is this? Is it worth it for a municipal [00:07:36] council membership? I mean, you'd think [00:07:40] he's going to be the President of the United States. What [00:07:43] are you trying to share as a municipal council member? I don't understand. Isn't it a very [00:07:47] strange level, Ercüment Bey? There is such [00:07:50] a shameful situation, but I watched it many [00:07:53] times to understand why this happened, how they argued. [00:07:57] Now that you've shown it, I've watched it again. The people in the video, [00:08:01] what I saw was that the group [00:08:05] deputy chairman of the IMM is blushing, [00:08:08] I mean, his face is red. He's blushing. [00:08:13] Because he's presiding over the session, because he's ashamed [00:08:16] of the situation. He's showing a humane attitude, [00:08:19] I think. He's also showing a mature attitude and [00:08:23] apologizing on behalf of the entire council because the people of Istanbul [00:08:27] are watching. He takes it upon himself. He shows this virtue. [00:08:30] Normally, if this happened in the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, [00:08:33] or I'm trying to understand the picture from there, [00:08:36] let's compare it to that. There are group spokespersons for the parties, [00:08:39] right? Let's say something individual happened, they argued. Something unpleasant [00:08:43] happened, tempers flared. They would come together, consult, [00:08:47] and calm the situation with joint or mutual statements, [00:08:50] apologizing together. This issue would be over. But there's [00:08:54] no such attitude, no such maturity. If it happened again, she would say it again. This [00:08:58] shows a power intoxication, this is power intoxication. [00:09:01] I am powerful, I can do whatever I want. She did it, she showed [00:09:05] that power, she did it. If others are not making statements, [00:09:08] if no statements are coming from the AK Party or MHP, [00:09:12] it creates a picture like, "if [00:09:15] the power is ours, anyone can do whatever they want." That's the worst [00:09:19] part. They should be examples for children, examples for children in Istanbul. [00:09:22] Schools have started, so let's move past everything. And [00:09:26] it really bothers one, I'm trying [00:09:30] to understand it. Why should a woman [00:09:34] be remembered or criticized [00:09:36] by her husband? From the woman's [00:09:38] side. This is also a terrible [00:09:41] thing. I'm thinking, is this one of the [00:09:45] consequences of our withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention? [00:09:49] It comes to mind, you know. But it's a very [00:09:52] bad situation. The issue is actually more than a debate [00:09:55] in the municipal council, it's about the state [00:09:58] of the political arena, I don't want to say political climate all the time. [00:10:02] We need to talk about the current state of affairs. [00:10:06] We're going into an election in such a harsh [00:10:09] environment. One says, "where's your husband?" [00:10:13] Another says, "come here." Another says, "whatnot." [00:10:16] I mean, I haven't heard such [00:10:18] language from the head of state, a municipal council [00:10:22] member, I mean, I haven't heard such things from Erdoğan [00:10:25] like "where is your wife, where is your husband?" I mean, in the past, [00:10:29] Mr. President had some words that we criticized, [00:10:32] but one would think he's the president, he has [00:10:36] such power, but he asks "where is your husband?" I mean, [00:10:39] we're going into an election in such an atmosphere, and in such [00:10:43] an atmosphere, we're really expecting the economy to improve. [00:10:46] For example, we can connect it to that again, maybe it's [00:10:50] a small complaint, but as I said, Ekrem İmamoğlu [00:10:52] receives a penalty for calling the Tuzla mayor [00:10:56] "discourteous." He receives [00:10:59] a penalty in a case where he was acquitted twice, but after the case [00:11:03] was reversed and the judge was changed, he received [00:11:07] a penalty. Saying he received a penalty [00:11:11] already reveals it. Please. Really, [00:11:14] I think no one should [00:11:17] say that these matters have nothing to do with the judiciary, [00:11:21] and I think the number of people who say that is very limited [00:11:24] now. These decisions truly [00:11:27] deal a powerful blow [00:11:28] to the country's [00:11:32] democracy, legitimacy, [00:11:35] and the legitimacy of the governments. Therefore, you cannot [00:11:39] prevent the high cost of living, because with [00:11:42] this decision, you are showing [00:11:45] that you cannot [00:11:47] politically compete [00:11:50] with the opposition circles [00:11:53] or cadres, I cannot. But [00:11:56] then I will remove them [00:11:58] from the game, [00:12:01] I will remove them from the game [00:12:04] by using state power. [00:12:07] But again, I repeat, we are not [00:12:11] living a thousand years ago. All the developments from an hour [00:12:15] ago, I believe, can now be heard even in the remotest [00:12:18] corners of Turkey, they are heard. [00:12:22] The people see. I trust this the most. [00:12:25] Today, you will say about Ekrem [00:12:29] İmamoğlu's case that [00:12:33] he already had 13 cases, the judge changed 19 [00:12:36] times. In the [00:12:39] "idiot" case, he was given the maximum [00:12:43] penalty for insult, which is unprecedented in the history of the Republic. [00:12:47] This time, even above what the prosecutor requested, [00:12:50] and in a single session, the new judge [00:12:54] again gave the maximum penalty. He gave a penalty [00:12:58] above what the prosecutor requested, a maximum penalty. [00:13:01] I mean, this [00:13:04] truly became a very [00:13:07] concrete example for everyone, [00:13:11] especially those who say these cases are not political. [00:13:14] In a very negative sense, for our country, [00:13:18] it created very strong negative examples. [00:13:21] So, if [00:13:24] you think you can win elections [00:13:28] by pushing politicians you couldn't [00:13:31] defeat at the ballot box out of the game in this way, I think [00:13:35] the council members have become the brightest [00:13:39] political actors of the last period. In the part where you weren't on air, [00:13:42] we talked about Tahsin Usta, the CHP council member [00:13:46] who switched to the AK Party, saying, "they offered me the deputy mayoralty, [00:13:49] so I switched." So, we are in an [00:13:52] environment where even municipal council members have become [00:13:56] political actors. We are in such [00:13:59] an atmosphere. So he says, "they offered me the deputy mayoralty, [00:14:03] and I believed I could serve, so I switched." [00:14:07] What did we see in nullity? The wills were corrupted [00:14:10] there, I mean, the delegates' will was corrupted there. [00:14:13] And now you are also putting on the badge [00:14:17] of another party with the promise of a political [00:14:21] office. What does that become then? Yes. [00:14:33] Perhaps you would like to evaluate it from this perspective. No, you are very right, but [00:14:36] I would like to recall a statement by Mr. President: [00:14:39] "The greatest corruption is disrespect [00:14:42] for the national will." So today, really, [00:14:46] I think the number of those who have been transferred [00:14:50] to the AK Party, or [00:14:53] removed from their posts, or arrested, [00:14:56] or who have switched to another party [00:15:00] with their votes in the municipal councils, [00:15:03] there are [00:15:05] municipalities. If you add all of them up, [00:15:09] the will shown by more than 50% of the voters [00:15:12] on March 31, 2024, [00:15:16] is not in the same place. I think this is not [00:15:19] a commendable situation for the AK Party. [00:15:22] On the contrary, [00:15:25] their own voters also feel that elections should [00:15:29] not be won this way. As I said earlier, [00:15:32] when we were talking today, it's a very hot, [00:15:35] really thought-provoking thing. I think AK Party members should think [00:15:39] more about this. There's no need to go to the polls to win [00:15:42] a mayoralty anymore. Four transfers, three [00:15:46] detentions, two arrests. I mean, targeting municipal council [00:15:49] members. I think this rhetoric itself [00:15:53] is a very bad example for [00:15:56] the AK Party government, a party whose name means [00:15:59] justice, during its 25-year [00:16:02] rule. These negative views towards [00:16:05] the AK Party are increasing. [00:16:09] The undecided AK Party voters [00:16:12] you showed in the first part, who might [00:16:15] vote for another party, [00:16:18] Ms. Senem, it's very important. Look, [00:16:22] we must accept that there will be no [00:16:24] change in the AK Party's 20-25% [00:16:27] voter base. A change [00:16:30] in the voter behavior of those [00:16:33] above that is expected. I always say this. The undecided [00:16:36] voters you mentioned, who say they might vote [00:16:40] for another party, were 10% and how much? [00:16:43] 24. 24. So, a group [00:16:47] close to 35% of the voters, [00:16:50] almost 20% of them, [00:16:53] is a very high percentage. So, their own voters are abandoning [00:16:57] them. I remember saying this in your broadcasts [00:17:01] as well, especially in provinces with conservative [00:17:03] voters, besides the high cost of living, [00:17:07] this double standard in justice is seen as [00:17:11] very contrary to the understanding of people [00:17:14] who believe in the justice of Omar. Therefore, [00:17:17] they are reacting by saying, "these things are happening with our [00:17:20] votes, people are being imprisoned, there are unfair, unlawful [00:17:24] arrests." And I tell you, [00:17:28] especially these people are waiting [00:17:31] to see what the new party will say. [00:17:34] So, it seems that most of them will switch [00:17:38] to that new party. My impression [00:17:42] from Anatolia is that [00:17:44] especially these people who have become alienated [00:17:48] from the AK Party, these voters, [00:17:50] are waiting to hear what the new party will say. Therefore, [00:17:54] in the first part, you also talked a little bit about [00:17:57] how I think the fluctuations in these [00:18:01] polls will decrease as the new party [00:18:04] explains itself more, because I strongly believe [00:18:08] that the voters have already [00:18:11] decided whom to send. [00:18:15] Now they are looking at who should come, [00:18:18] but the AK Party cannot [00:18:21] make itself the government [00:18:24] again in this way. This is something I always say, [00:18:28] how much I've used this phrase, but I'm right. [00:18:31] If it wants to come back to power, [00:18:35] it should not suppress, but rather implement [00:18:37] law, democracy, democratic maturity, [00:18:41] make institutions independent, and strengthen the parliament. [00:18:44] Then it will be stronger and luckier. [00:18:47] Look, last year in September, 420 [00:18:51] liters of diesel could be bought with the minimum wage. This [00:18:55] year, only 200 liters can be bought with the minimum wage. [00:18:59] I mean, I'm sorry, 350 liters. So now [00:19:03] if you calculate from this, next year, if [00:19:06] it continues like this, 200 liters, yes, next year, [00:19:10] if it continues at this pace, unfortunately, the trend shows [00:19:13] that. Do you remember, I'm going to say something, one second, [00:19:17] Mr. Şükrü, one second. When Mr. Özel was the CHP leader, [00:19:21] before he left the CHP, in the group meeting, he showed [00:19:24] 50 lira of gasoline to a citizen who said, "I always [00:19:28] buy 50 lira worth of diesel." Shall we watch those images? Look, [00:19:31] on that day, you could get this with 50 lira. [00:19:35] To them. [00:19:45] What did he say when they said there was a price hike? "It doesn't concern me, I always buy 50 lira worth." Here's 50 lira worth of diesel for you, here's 50 lira worth of diesel for you. [00:19:47] Oh, [00:19:50] the bottle is full. Now, [00:19:53] it's half. [00:19:56] He's probably laughing if he's watching now. So now, [00:20:00] it's not even that, that's good. It was full, madam. [00:20:04] You know Germany and England, who are jealous of us? [00:20:07] The minimum wage earner there can buy 1200 liters, [00:20:11] did you know? Yes. 1200 [00:20:14] liters. I'm looking, yes, currently [00:20:17] 300 liters can be bought with the current minimum [00:20:20] wage. So, of course, [00:20:23] at this point, things have gotten out of control. [00:20:27] Things are completely out of whack. It's not [00:20:31] at a stage where it can be easily rectified. The government, [00:20:35] as we understand it, is not attributing this [00:20:38] solely to geopolitical risks and ongoing wars, but [00:20:42] it's a fact that [00:20:45] it has deepened more than ever before. [00:20:49] But they were saying this in September, that a much more [00:20:52] serious crisis would be faced. Our intention is not [00:20:56] to paint a pessimistic picture here. We're trying [00:20:59] to understand when [00:21:02] the light at the end of the tunnel will appear, [00:21:05] how these conditions can [00:21:08] change in Turkey, how citizens' purchasing [00:21:11] power can increase, and how inflation can be curbed, [00:21:14] right? I mean, our goal is not to draw such a pessimistic [00:21:18] picture here and say, "oh, we're finished, we're ruined," but to understand [00:21:22] what will happen, where this is going. Please, Ercüment. Well, [00:21:25] I said it in the previous part too, this country has seen a lot of difficulties. [00:21:29] It saw the 1980 military coup, it saw the January 24 [00:21:32] decisions, it saw huge privatizations, it saw huge [00:21:36] prohibitions. were closed, May 1st [00:21:39] was forbidden. These were overcome, they can be overcome. It came out of that [00:21:43] darkness. It didn't happen in a day or a year, but people fought, [00:21:46] came together, reopened their unions, [00:21:50] went to the streets, and liberated the spaces. So, there is no [00:21:54] need to be pessimistic. To be hopeful, [00:21:57] it's useful to look at our own history. [00:22:00] The light at the end of the tunnel can be that. [00:22:04] People need to trust their own strength a little. It's not the time [00:22:06] to despair, to retreat into [00:22:10] an atmosphere of fear and helplessness. And there's this: why [00:22:13] so much pressure, I wonder? [00:22:15] Where can this lead? Can it lead [00:22:19] to a social explosion? If it's not organized, [00:22:22] if it's not disciplined, if it doesn't have a democratic [00:22:25] tradition, if it doesn't have a trade union tradition, [00:22:29] it can emerge as indignant explosions. In quotation marks, I say, [00:22:32] it can also emerge as more uncontrolled and more lumpen [00:22:36] social movements, again in quotation marks. It would be a pity [00:22:39] for the country, the country is not going [00:22:41] in a good direction. That's why we need to [00:22:45] act now, there is a need for a struggle approach [00:22:49] where democratic, organized, union-backed parties [00:22:52] also find strength there. I would like to say something [00:22:56] about the graphics you showed in the previous [00:22:59] section regarding the elections. I said [00:23:02] it in one of the previous programs on Halk TV, [00:23:05] that I am immune to these poll issues, [00:23:09] they change a lot, and they will change even more. [00:23:13] I mean, when I look at the operations, arrests, [00:23:16] and access blocks of the last few days, I ask myself [00:23:20] this: how do these polling companies conduct [00:23:23] their surveys and publish their research? [00:23:27] They called 2,000 people, they called 5,000 people. [00:23:30] Can these people who were called easily say "I am voting [00:23:33] for the opposition party" now, compared to a month [00:23:36] ago, two months ago, three months ago? People are afraid. I think [00:23:40] it doesn't reflect the truth much from that [00:23:42] perspective either. No public research company's [00:23:45] work, no poll, can truly be [00:23:48] a reference we can vouch for. [00:23:52] There's also this situation now: don't believe the polls, [00:23:55] stay away from the polls. I always make this parenthesis: [00:23:59] if you fall into a power intoxication thinking "we've got this," [00:24:03] the opposition will lose. They always need to take it seriously and work [00:24:07] hard. This is a separate dimension, but I agree [00:24:10] with Mr. Şükrü there. There's a perception for Erdoğan: [00:24:14] how many elections has he won with his party? The citizen [00:24:18] says, "you will kiss the arm you cannot bend." [00:24:20] But all these municipal takeovers, changes of hands, transfers, [00:24:24] was that arm bent? Can't he take it? Why is he doing this? [00:24:28] I think this is not a good situation [00:24:31] for the AK Party either. It's a situation that further [00:24:35] diminishes its prestige towards the elections. [00:24:38] I mean, even the economies of countries at war [00:24:41] are not as bad [00:24:44] as ours right now. So this is [00:24:47] what's really bad. I mean, we looked [00:24:50] the other day, in terms of food inflation, we're worse [00:24:53] than Iran, which is at war, worse than fragmented [00:24:57] Iraq. How can you be? The man is in pieces. [00:25:00] There's also this, let me add something, Ms. Sinema, you reminded me well. [00:25:04] So, what was Turkey's geopolitical foreign policy equation always [00:25:07] like? It always paid attention to balances [00:25:11] between the West, Eurasia, and the Middle East, trying to maintain good relations [00:25:14] with everyone, one way or another, right? You have a trade volume [00:25:18] with Iran, [00:25:20] you have a certain energy supply from the Gulf, [00:25:23] Russian natural gas, Ukrainian grain. Now it has entered [00:25:27] such a situation, especially with the NATO summit, [00:25:31] it has moved towards a single axis, and relations with Russia [00:25:35] it's being shot, your situation with Iran isn't like before, now the Mecca [00:25:39] tripartite summit has been held. So what will happen to Saudi [00:25:41] Arabia? An interesting point was mentioned there, I don't know if it was [00:25:45] necessary, I mean, like NATO's Article 5, if one of the three countries [00:25:48] is attacked. All countries will be involved. Now Saudi [00:25:52] Arabia is entering the Yemen War, withdrawing, asking for help from Israel. So what [00:25:55] will Turkey do? So, these [00:25:59] balances are also being shaken, these affecting the economy. [00:26:02] I think they are affecting it more negatively. Yes, but sir, I mean, with the effect [00:26:06] of the war, the Central Bank is burning 30 billion dollars, [00:26:10] but Mr. Ekrem İmamoğlu's March 19 operation [00:26:13] and afterwards burned 60 billion dollars. So, [00:26:17] with such an effect in the war, [00:26:21] we see 30 billion on the foreign front, but here, in a legal [00:26:25] event, against an illegality, we are paying 60 billion. [00:26:28] We are paying this with Mehmet Şimşek. Since he first [00:26:32] came, with a tight monetary policy, for two years, he has been trying [00:26:35] to bring it to a certain level. With the March [00:26:39] 19 operation, perhaps you are going back two years. [00:26:41] are affecting the economy. [00:26:45] I think it affects it more negatively. Yes, but sir, with the effect [00:26:49] of the war, the Central Bank [00:26:52] burns 30 billion dollars, [00:26:56] but Mr. Ekrem İmamoğlu's March 19 operation [00:26:59] and afterwards burns 60 billion dollars. So, [00:27:04] with such an effect in the war, [00:27:08] we see 30 billion on the foreign front, but here, in a legal [00:27:11] event, against an illegality, we are paying 60 billion. [00:27:15] We are paying this with Mehmet Şimşek. Since he first came, with a tight monetary [00:27:18] policy, for two years, he has been trying to bring it to a certain level. With the March [00:27:22] 19 operation, perhaps you are going back [00:27:26] two years. Now, that's ending. Perhaps you are saying [00:27:29] we will try to fix that in 6-7 months, then the absolute nullification [00:27:33] decision comes. I mean, as long as these continue, [00:27:37] and now we are talking about law, predictability, law, [00:27:39] there is a control mechanism. Now, we are talking about these taxes, [00:27:43] right? For days, what's in the public eye? A guy from Van, [00:27:47] a Van Haydar. No income is shown, [00:27:50] no company exists, but there is a money [00:27:53] transfer of 212 million. How are we auditing [00:27:57] this? Let's skip the political part, the trials. [00:28:01] And how are we doing the actual audit mechanism? [00:28:05] While just 1-2% of Turkey is playing with [00:28:08] millions, hundreds of millions, the other side [00:28:11] is struggling with hunger. Are we auditing those hundreds [00:28:14] of millions? Is it when the "above the sieve" [00:28:18] section's source of money, and how these came to be, [00:28:22] only appears on social media that we see it? [00:28:25] I mean, if someone with the same income, [00:28:29] the same ostentation, didn't use a social media [00:28:32] account, and we didn't see these on social media, [00:28:36] would these continue like this in the country? Will we audit them [00:28:40] this way? With this audit, we can't [00:28:43] prevent tax loss, we can't prevent tax [00:28:46] evasion loss. We talk about opposition to the tax procedure [00:28:50] law, about black money, but these can't [00:28:53] be collected. While struggling, we suddenly say that [00:28:57] the 20% VAT has been increased [00:29:00] there, the overseas departure [00:29:07] fee has been increased, and again, it's the minimum wage earner [00:29:11] or someone trying to make a living with a normal wage who suffers. [00:29:14] So, what we call law, fully, criminal law is a separate [00:29:18] matter, but we also need to talk about public law, tax [00:29:21] law. We need to make all of them work together [00:29:24] in a healthy way so that this economy [00:29:27] recovers and yields results in the future. [00:29:30] But if we are in such an unmanageable [00:29:34] situation both in terms of taxes [00:29:38] and... then the outcome is that [00:29:41] the situation gets worse. By the way, the Yeni Şafak [00:29:44] newspaper, for a long time, has been [00:29:47] against Şimşek. A prosecutor, Sayan, [00:29:50] said today that AKP's prosecutor [00:29:54] Sayan said, "Don't expect much [00:29:58] from Mehmet Şimşek. His thing is to make the rich [00:30:01] richer and the poor poorer." He said this is his style. [00:30:05] Abou, I said. Abou, I said Yeni Şafak. [00:30:08] His suggestion was always this: why do only companies [00:30:12] pay taxes for foreign currency? Apply this to all citizens, [00:30:15] individuals, citizens. I didn't take it very seriously [00:30:19] in these media analyses, readings, etc., but they are very [00:30:22] cornered, so I think they might consider these [00:30:26] options, these possibilities. [00:30:30] It's not impossible. I also want to contribute. [00:30:33] When Mr. Ertürç mentioned it, [00:30:36] I remembered. Look, [00:30:39] after March 25th, or rather, after the March [00:30:43] 19th coup, in the opposition's [00:30:46] words, interest rates, [00:30:50] bond interest, and [00:30:53] loan interest were 10 points [00:30:56] above what they should have been when compared to inflation. [00:30:59] It's such a large number because [00:31:03] of this: "This year alone, the interest [00:31:07] that the public will pay is 2.7 [00:31:10] trillion lira. Next year, this is projected [00:31:14] to be 4 trillion lira. The interest [00:31:16] that the private sector will pay is many [00:31:20] times more than this. So, currently, both [00:31:24] bond and loan interest rates [00:31:27] are over 50%, and the increase since [00:31:30] that operation has been 10 points. There [00:31:34] is no decline at all. That's why, [00:31:37] we always say law, that's why we say opposition. [00:31:40] I mean, it's not possible for the New Party, [00:31:44] the Republican People's Party, or other opposition [00:31:48] parties to be a means of support for us. But [00:31:51] if these are harming the country's economy [00:31:54] and democracy, then we also [00:31:58] have to take a side in this, [00:32:01] we must. I mean, [00:32:04] this ethical obligation exists for journalists. [00:32:08] As you know, for example, I want to give another example. Unfortunately, [00:32:11] in its 25 years of power, [00:32:15] it could not create good examples in agriculture [00:32:19] and livestock. I mean, 15 years ago, [00:32:21] Turkey's grain [00:32:25] production was 16 million tons, and Russia's [00:32:29] was also 16 million. Yes, 20 [00:32:32] million, I think. No, both were 16 [00:32:35] million tons. Today, Russia is 80 million [00:32:39] tons, Turkey is 20 million [00:32:42] tons. I always give this example. Some people tell me, "Russia [00:32:46] has a large area." We were the same then. Let's [00:32:49] skip its area. Ukraine is 35 million [00:32:52] tons. What are we boasting about? We are boasting about being a grain [00:32:56] corridor. No. Turkey could easily have been one [00:33:00] of the world's most important grain silos. [00:33:03] For example, during the AK Party government, [00:33:07] your Konya was like that, for example, [00:33:10] it was one of the world's largest grain depots, of course, of course. [00:33:13] For example, Mr. Ercüment, you know better. [00:33:16] The evacuated villages [00:33:20] were villages where livestock breeding and agriculture were very [00:33:24] strong, especially livestock breeding. During the AK Party government, [00:33:26] I think these areas should have been brought [00:33:30] back to livestock breeding. But such a policy [00:33:33] and... such a priority was never pursued. [00:33:37] That's why we even started seeing imported meat [00:33:41] in Erzurum. I mean, it's a surprising [00:33:45] situation for Turkey. These also happened [00:33:48] during the AK Party government, and seriously, I'll tell [00:33:52] you, like their own slogan, "If AK Party does it, it does it," [00:33:55] there are so many bad examples in law, in democracy, [00:33:58] in trials, in livestock breeding, [00:34:02] in agriculture, that it's really like, "If [00:34:05] AK Party does it, it does it." I'll say something, [00:34:08] I want to interrupt. Now, you know. Okay, [00:34:11] you say, "If AK Party does it, it does it," but now [00:34:15] the pressure that AK Party has applied on the opposition [00:34:19] for the last year and a half, the operations against [00:34:22] municipalities, the trustee politics, the transfer [00:34:26] of council members, their detention [00:34:29] or arrest from time to time, you know, [00:34:33] last week, AK Party won the Foça Municipality, [00:34:37] for which it didn't even nominate a candidate, [00:34:39] with the transfer of the female mayor. However, [00:34:43] I just said it was very interesting. Council members are being talked [00:34:46] about more than ever before. Ms. Yağmur, if I'm not [00:34:50] mistaken, look at the beautiful [00:34:51] speech she gave [00:34:54] at the Izmir Metropolitan Municipality Council meeting. [00:34:58] Can we listen? Did you see these as something [00:35:01] to be celebrated? You took the places that the people [00:35:04] did not appreciate and give to you, by pressing the mayor, [00:35:07] by other means with the council member, in points where people [00:35:11] did not give their votes to you, you counted those votes as taken [00:35:14] through various ways and turned around and congratulated yourselves. [00:35:17] Is this a success? I think this is at best [00:35:21] helplessness. Now I want to ask, or by this means, [00:35:24] you say you have taken those districts. Don't you think that when [00:35:27] the day comes, the nation will take back what belongs to them [00:35:31] from you? Don't you know, don't you see that the limit [00:35:34] of what you can take [00:35:36] remains in the conscience [00:35:39] of the nation? Don't you hear the voices of the street [00:35:43] at all? The nation whose votes you disregarded, [00:35:46] who you disrespected, will hold you accountable [00:35:50] for all of this, for denying national [00:35:53] sovereignty. This nation, which you have impoverished [00:35:55] despite all the wealth you have taken from its bridges, [00:35:59] highways, and factories, will hold you accountable [00:36:03] for this. But let everyone know, the curse [00:36:06] of this noble nation will not go unpunished. [00:36:09] The day will come when the short straw [00:36:12] will demand its right from the long one and take it. [00:36:16] You didn't waffle, you didn't ramble, [00:36:19] you didn't say uh. Yağmur Yurdakul [00:36:22] Özkan at the Izmir Metropolitan Municipality [00:36:26] Council meeting. Do you think [00:36:29] that the street will not ask for an account [00:36:32] of this? Don't you hear [00:36:34] the voice of the street at all? [00:36:38] But we have been talking about this for a year and a half. Has the AK Party become [00:36:42] too detached from the street? Doesn't [00:36:44] it hear? Is the distance between [00:36:48] it and the people increasing every day? [00:36:51] Well, I think so. I think its organizations have also [00:36:55] become detached, Ms. Sinem. Because they are watching [00:36:58] what's happening in astonishment. What will they say [00:37:02] to people on the street? Look, I attach great [00:37:06] importance to this example, because they lost touch [00:37:10] with the youth. Why wouldn't they lose touch? [00:37:14] I mean, coffee shops are opening [00:37:17] everywhere, especially regarding coffee, and young people [00:37:21] really like it. They go there, study, [00:37:25] socialize, and have opportunities [00:37:28] to chat. They are also very nice places, [00:37:31] but the cheapest coffee is 200 lira. [00:37:35] 200 lira. [00:37:39] Okay, let me get [00:37:41] a final assessment from Mr. Ercüment as [00:37:45] we're slowly approaching the end. [00:37:49] Let me tell you, it's this: [00:37:52] now you've lost a municipality [00:37:56] as the ruling party. You have [00:38:00] organizations, you have branches, women's, youth [00:38:03] organizations. What do you do? [00:38:06] You work with all your might to win [00:38:10] that place towards the election, you mobilize, right? [00:38:13] Now, that would be the motivation. But [00:38:16] if that place is taken through [00:38:20] transfers, and if this path has been opened, [00:38:23] or if it's being emptied and taken through [00:38:27] arrests via the judiciary, then what's the point of working? [00:38:29] It will come to us anyway. Therefore, [00:38:33] he said something very good, true, why should [00:38:36] I bother? I mean, there's no chance [00:38:40] of me succeeding and being discovered from somewhere. [00:38:44] I always warn the opposition not [00:38:47] to fall into complacency, but I think the real [00:38:51] complacency can appear in the ruling party's [00:38:54] organizations. I mean, someone from the same [00:38:58] organization works, enters the district from the youth [00:39:01] branches, perhaps has a dream of becoming a mayor, [00:39:05] then suddenly, with a transfer from the opposing party, [00:39:08] a more valuable candidate is shown. And it happened [00:39:12] a lot, but yes, I mean, if you look now, it's not [00:39:15] just council members or mayors. MPs also [00:39:18] came. Some of those MPs were given important [00:39:21] positions in the general headquarters, like a vice [00:39:25] chairman, like Kürşat Zorlu, for example. I mean, [00:39:28] if a man who has worked in organizations for years [00:39:32] suddenly has a dream of becoming a vice chairman [00:39:35] at some point, then tough luck. And at [00:39:39] some point, that person who became a vice chairman, [00:39:42] or that person who became a mayor, spent years [00:39:45] criticizing these people. I mean, in small [00:39:49] places, especially in district politics, they engaged [00:39:52] in personal animosities, in dialogues. Now, how [00:39:56] will the voters accept [00:40:27] to be ashamed of, in my opinion. [00:40:29] Let me tell you something, do you remember when [00:40:33] Menemen Municipality passed to the AK Party, [00:40:36] the lady, I apologize, I can't remember [00:40:40] her name, had a video conference with the President, [00:40:43] and she said, "We believed and we won." For example, [00:40:46] she believes she won that place. Yes, [00:40:50] I mean, she thinks she actually entered [00:40:53] an election there, a ballot box was placed [00:40:56] there, and she came out successfully. [00:41:00] I mean, it's an incredible thing, I mean, she says, [00:41:03] "We believed," "We believed and we won." [00:41:07] Yes, let me finish the sentence, from [00:41:11] where you said, I mean, the situation [00:41:15] on the side of the government is like this, there will [00:41:18] be a more complacent situation, but on the opposition [00:41:22] side, there is also a danger bell. [00:41:25] Now, people [00:41:40] slept on top of the election bags for days, of course, [00:41:58] to hand over those wet signature [00:42:01] records. I mean, what efforts [00:42:02] were made, what sacrifices [00:42:11] were made? Now, you elect [00:42:14] a mayor, you elect council members, [00:42:18] I mean, they are taking everything into account, [00:42:22] I mean, they are taking [00:42:25] everything into account, the voters, the citizens, the party [00:42:28] members, but if you switch to [00:42:31] that side overnight, then there can be very serious ruptures [00:42:35] here. Next [00:42:41] time, next time, there needs [00:42:44] to be a filter, and there needs to be [00:42:47] public oversight regarding candidacies, but also [00:42:51] the public shouldn't be so easily... [00:42:54] But we've always talked about this, especially [00:42:57] for the past year during this transfer period, we've always [00:43:01] evaluated this, Ercüment Akdeniz. I mean, will [00:43:05] the voters say, when election day comes, "What's it [00:43:07] to me, brother? I'm going, [00:43:10] I'm voting, they're getting arrested. I'm going, I'm voting, [00:43:13] they're getting transferred. I'm going, I'm voting"? [00:43:55] But politically, there's a weariness. The trustee [00:43:59] practice is evident. Look, previously, HDP, [00:44:02] now DEM, how many trustees came? Three. [00:44:06] People think, if that's pressure, [00:44:09] "Even if it's only for 3 days, I'll go and take it." [00:44:12] They had trained about 6,000 ballot [00:44:15] observers. All but 10,000 [00:44:19] had switched to the new party. So, actually, it's [00:44:22] good to see that the new party was [00:44:25] quite prepared in this regard. [00:44:29] You also, I guess, had a contribution. [00:44:32] I was just going to add, when you say transfer, [00:44:36] it also reminds one of football. [00:44:40] Now, we said, will these transfers make us think, [00:44:43] "Let's not vote in these elections"? I wanted to [00:44:46] give an example from football. Fenerbahçe had a match [00:44:50] two weeks ago. Fenerbahçe hasn't been to the Champions [00:44:53] League for 18 years. It went, my dear, now it's [00:44:57] complete. That's what I'm saying, there wasn't an empty seat [00:45:01] in the stadium during the match. Even after 18 years, [00:45:04] people believed, and Fenerbahçe is now in the Champions [00:45:08] League. Well, this example you gave from football [00:45:11] really applies to politics too. Transfers, of course, [00:45:15] evoke that. Thank you very much, lawyer Ertunç Özyalçın, [00:45:19] journalist Ercüment Akdeniz. Thank you, and my journalist [00:45:23] colleague Şükrü Küçükşahin presented. [00:45:27] to become members of a political party [00:45:30] they had opposed for years. Here, [00:45:34] we are already shouting that there is both [00:45:37] a threat and an incentive. Furthermore, if we look [00:45:41] at the last Üsküdar elections, two more [00:45:45] council members there, although they remained [00:45:48] in the Republican People's Party, voted for the [00:45:52] AK Party candidate. Let's say these friends [00:45:55] thought the same thing. Did they not have enough [00:45:58] time to switch to the AK Party, or did the AK Party [00:46:02] not have enough votes to win the Üsküdar elections, [00:46:05] so they needed to threaten or incentivize more people? These [00:47:23] are all very clear. All of these are already [00:47:26] very clear. Let's get to the issue [00:47:30] regarding our convention. Our [00:47:33] friends, in the convention indictment, [00:47:36] had such photos, convention photos taken, circled [00:47:39] in red. Look, they were [00:47:43] next to Özgür Özel at the convention, [00:47:46] and now they've become council members. [00:47:48] A big crime. This was shown as a crime. [00:47:52] How? Özgür Özel promised [00:47:55] that he would win the convention, and after [00:47:59] winning the convention, he would make them council [00:48:02] members. This was political bribery. [00:48:05] It was also against the Political Parties [00:48:08] Law. Someone in his own [00:48:11] party, because they walk with him, [00:48:14] yes, he might consider placing them somewhere. [00:48:18] This is natural in politics, at the same time, [00:48:21] our minds inevitably recall the 38th [00:48:25] convention. There was a lawsuit filed and [00:48:29] a decision of absolute nullification, with the [00:48:32] claim and accusation that the wills of the delegates [00:48:35] were crippled. Now, what exactly was crippled [00:48:39] here, I couldn't understand. I would appreciate it [00:48:42] if you could explain. I was actually [00:48:45] going to start from there. Let's say [00:48:49] what we would say at the end at the beginning. [00:48:53] Only 4 council members in Üsküdar decided [00:48:57] to switch from the CHP to the AKP. [00:49:00] So, there is no crippling of will, [00:49:04] no offer, no incentive, nothing. [00:49:07] It's just a coincidence that four separate [00:49:10] individuals suddenly decided to resign [00:49:13] from the Republican People's Party Council [00:49:16] membership at the same time. Suddenly, [00:49:20] they found themselves in a political drift, [00:49:24] and what a coincidence that they all decided [00:49:27] to reunite in the same place. Either [00:49:31] these four separate people internalized this, [00:49:34] experienced it without any incentive, any threat, [00:49:38] and suddenly decided [00:49:40] arkadaşlarımız [00:49:43] kurultay iddianamesinde böyle fotoğrafları kurultay [00:49:46] fotoğrafları çekilerek, böyle kırmızı yuvarlaklar içerisine [00:49:50] alınarak fotoğrafları. Bakın [00:49:52] kurultayda Özgür Özel'in yanındaymış, şimdi Meclis [00:49:56] üyesi olmuş. Büyük suç. Bu [00:50:00] suç olarak gösterildi. Nasıl? Özgür [00:50:02] Özel kurultayı kazanacağını, kurultayı [00:50:06] kazandıktan sonra kendisini meclis üyesi yapacağını [00:50:10] taahüt etmiş. Bu siyasi rüşvetmiş. Siyasi [00:50:14] partiler kanununa da aykırıymış. Kendi [00:50:17] partisindeki birisi kendisiyle yol yürüyor diye, [00:50:20] evet bir yerde değerlendirmeyi. düşünebilir, zaten siyasetin [00:50:24] doğasında bu vardır, insanlar beraber yol yürüdükleri insanlarla [00:50:27] siyasette devam etmek isterler, kaldı ki siz [00:50:30] bunu bir suç olarak göreceksiniz, [00:50:33] dahası bizim daha yeni tahliye olan meclis [00:50:36] üyemiz kurultay delegesi dahili [00:50:39] olamadı, bakın kurultay delegesi dahili [00:50:43] olamadığı halde, çünkü il seçimlerinde [00:50:46] farklı adayları desteklemişlerdi, ya [00:50:49] cezaevinden yeni çıktı, kurultay delegesi bile değildi rüşvet [00:50:53] vermiş, meclis üyesi yapmış, kurultay delegesi olmayan birisine niye rüşvet verdi [00:50:56] Özgür Özel dedik, bu insanlar durduk yeri [00:51:00] ceza evlerinde kalıyor, yazıktır, günahtır dedik, buradan [00:51:03] yola çıkarak bir kişinin gözaltına [00:51:06] alınması, tutuklanması, bir kişinin bile bir gün bir saat özgürlüğünden [00:51:10] mahrum bırakılması zaten kabul edilecek bir şey değil ama buradan [00:51:13] 103 yıllık partiye kayyum atadılar, ya [00:51:16] cumhuriyet halk partisi'ne kayyum atandı buradan bu [00:51:19] people want to continue [00:51:22] in politics with those they walk with. Moreover, [00:51:26] you will consider this a crime. [00:51:29] Furthermore, our council member who was [00:51:33] just released from prison couldn't even become [00:51:37] a convention delegate. Look, even though [00:51:40] he couldn't even become a convention delegate, [00:51:43] because they had supported different candidates in the provincial elections. [00:51:47] He just got out of prison. He wasn't even a convention [00:51:50] a member says, they offered me another... Deputy position, and I said yes. [00:51:54] What is this? Is this not political bribery? [00:51:58] Let me tell you, I think [00:52:01] this is the most innocent incident that Tahsin Usta [00:52:05] recounted in Üsküdar. I think it's the most innocent incident. [00:52:09] Saying "come, I'll make you a deputy mayor" to offer political [00:52:12] bribery, if you could appoint a trustee [00:52:16] to the 103-year-old Republican People's Party, [00:52:19] then re-elections in Üsküdar are not enough. [00:52:22] You should bring the same offer [00:52:26] you applied now. [00:52:29] Just as you took the council member in, [00:52:33] then take Mr. Tahsin. For the same reason, for violating [00:52:36] the Political Parties Law, for the same [00:52:39] reason, ask Mr. Tahsin, "Who made this offer to you, [00:52:42] brother?" How did this happen? When [00:52:45] making a choice between two candidates within the party can be considered [00:52:49] such a crime, is it not a crime to switch to another [00:52:52] party and make the municipality elected by the people win for [00:52:56] a party they didn't elect? Will they ask Mr. Tahsin [00:53:00] "Who did it?" If there was such a rumor [00:53:03] in any municipality of the Republican People's Party or today's [00:53:07] new party, prosecutors would immediately be called to duty. [00:53:10] Immediately, even before being called, [00:53:14] prosecutors would take this as their duty and start. Why is this not asked [00:53:17] to Mr. Tahsin? It's not asked because [00:53:20] we know this. We also know the reason for the second [00:53:23] and third operations in Üsküdar. There will be no more operations [00:53:27] in Üsküdar. They already got what they wanted. [00:53:31] But today in the last [00:53:35] elections, our candidate, Ms. Sibel, made a speech in the IBB council. [00:53:39] I was able to listen to it today. I don't know if she did it today or if it came [00:53:43] across me today. She said, [00:53:46] yes, you can enter a municipality, you can sit [00:53:49] in office, you can even [00:53:53] sign documents, and those signatures can be official signatures, [00:53:56] very true. But you cannot win the heart of a city [00:54:00] with decrees, she said you cannot enter the heart of a city. But [00:54:02] we also don't think that there are any concerns [00:54:06] about creating social consensus for a citizen. I mean, [00:54:09] is there really a concern about creating social consent in the citizen or has that threshold already been crossed? [00:54:12] Let's get to that in a bit, Mr. Dünder. Now, [00:54:16] this confession, actually, Mr. Usta's [00:54:19] statement, let me say, not confession, [00:54:21] is clearer and more distinct [00:54:25] than the allegations that led to the annulment [00:54:28] of the CHP's general assembly, meaning absolute annulment. [00:54:32] A very clear statement: "Deputy mayor." [00:54:35] Now, what kind of move would you expect from the Turkish [00:54:38] judiciary, which has ruled for annulment, regarding this? [00:54:41] What should actually happen? Of course, [00:54:44] in an ideal situation, citizens [00:54:47] and the public would expect [00:54:50] a similar action to be taken [00:54:54] for Üsküdar in a legal [00:54:56] system where the rule of law prevails. Also, [00:54:59] Mr. Tahsin may have let it slip [00:55:03] inadvertently. He says, I believe [00:55:07] Ms. Sinem Dedetaş [00:55:09] did not do the dirty [00:55:12] work that was directed [00:55:15] at her. He says, I wouldn't even attribute such a thing to her. He says, "I wouldn't [00:55:19] attribute it." This means, in his [00:55:23] eyes, Sinem Nedetaş, the currently imprisoned mayor of Üsküdar, [00:55:26] is a clean mayor, an innocent mayor. [00:55:29] He also makes such a confession. Therefore, [00:55:32] if we look at another aspect [00:55:36] of the issue, these municipal council members, [00:55:39] okay, they change parties for one reason or another, [00:55:43] but the voters didn't vote for them [00:55:47] to take office in the parties they went to; [00:55:50] they voted for them to be in opposition. [00:55:54] Doing such a thing without the consent [00:55:57] of the voters is, in my opinion, ethically [00:56:01] extremely wrong. You'll [00:56:03] say, what's left, but we must [00:56:07] defend ethical values to the end. [00:56:09] Look, today, [00:56:12] Foça, a district where the Justice [00:56:15] and Development Party didn't even [00:56:19] enter the elections, won the mayoralty there. [00:56:23] But what happened next? The mayor [00:56:26] is the host at the ceremonies [00:56:30] held on September 11, the anniversary of Foça's liberation. [00:56:34] The shopkeepers [00:56:43] in Sent Pazarı protested, meaning [00:56:45] the direction of the politician is actually [00:56:49] determined [00:56:51] by the people, by the voters who [00:56:55] cast their votes for him. If the voters [00:56:58] assign him a direction, and he goes [00:57:01] in the opposite direction, then [00:57:05] it means that politician's life, [00:57:08] I think, is coming to an end. [00:57:11] Because every action [00:57:14] taken against the will of the voters [00:57:17] is a very important factor that prepares the end [00:57:21] of that politician. They will probably [00:57:24] not get votes from the Justice and Development Party voters [00:57:27] anymore, because I am [00:57:30] speaking, and conscientious Justice and Development Party voters [00:57:33] do not accept this. They say, [00:57:37] "We must win a mayoralty and that municipality's [00:57:40] council with our votes, given by our free will. [00:57:44] Otherwise, such behaviors [00:57:47] do not conform to our morals [00:57:49] and do not meet our expectations. Therefore, they say, [00:57:53] we never approve." I have friends in Üsküdar, [00:57:57] for example; I talk to them, and they evaluate it this way. [00:58:00] Therefore, Mr. Gökçek compared it [00:58:03] to the annulment case. [00:58:06] It's very clear, of course. The evidence [00:58:10] here is very clear, very obvious, [00:58:12] it's a confession. The other [00:58:15] is annulment, annulment. Allegation, allegation, allegation. Here, [00:58:19] confession. Exactly, and there's another thing. [00:58:23] Is it forbidden for AK Party, according to the law, [00:58:26] or for CHP or the new party [00:58:29] to persuade a delegate or a council member? I mean, when you [00:58:32] set out to persuade a delegate, you are corrupting [00:58:36] the will, you are crippling the will. But when [00:58:39] the AK Party's Istanbul Provincial Directorate or District Directorate [00:58:43] tries to do this by pressing a button, would a promise [00:58:47] of political office be ethical? No, why would it be? For example, [00:58:50] when the İyi Party was entering the elections, it brought Bilge Yılmaz [00:58:54] from a serious university in the United States. [00:58:57] It said, "If we come to power, I want to entrust the economy to you." [00:59:01] And the man came. Is this political bribery? I mean, [00:59:04] when you, as a political party official or leader, [00:59:08] say who you will work with and what duties you will distribute [00:59:11] when you come to power, can this be considered political bribery? Can such a thing happen? No, [00:59:15] on the contrary, it's a guarantee for the voter. Of course, it's about the voter. [00:59:19] You're providing inner peace and comfort [00:59:22] for the voter to feel secure with people [00:59:26] you trust deeply. You're giving them something, [00:59:30] inner peace, inner comfort. This is very important. [00:59:33] But a little while ago, before the program, [00:59:36] while chatting with dear Uğur Abi, I said that this Üsküdar [00:59:40] incident is actually a milestone in Turkish political history. [00:59:44] Perhaps I may have said it in the last program too, I'm still of the same opinion. [00:59:47] For example, I'll explain it very quickly, [00:59:51] so that our dear viewers don't get confused by the numbers, [00:59:54] who left, who came, who left, who came, and can follow the chronology. [00:59:58] A contractor complains. Sinem Dedetaş, the Mayor [01:00:01] of Üsküdar, is first detained based on a contractor's complaint, [01:00:04] then arrested. There's no conviction [01:00:07] yet, nothing, but since arrest has turned into a punishment [01:00:11] in Turkey, she's immediately arrested and sent to prison. [01:00:14] What will happen to the prison? The deputy mayor, Ms. Sibel, is elected [01:00:18] as the deputy mayor. Objections to the deputy mayor [01:00:21] are immediately accepted by the court, and then voting begins. [01:00:24] There are 28 council members, plus the mayor, makes 29. [01:00:27] They lose one, it drops to 27. What happens next is very interesting. [01:00:30] After 27, three are arrested, [01:00:34] I mean, detained. Two are arrested, [01:00:36] except for one. In between, 4 resignations. [01:00:40] In between, 4 resignations. Those who resign confess themselves. [01:00:44] They say, "You know, they said in the pavilions, in the hotels, [01:00:47] for the CHP's congress, we stayed in a hotel for 3 days." [01:00:50] You know, they had missed Turan at Galatasaray. [01:00:54] They had kept him in a hotel like they would abduct a football player [01:00:57] before a transfer contract. Exactly, like abducting a football player [01:01:01] in the 70s, they take him to a hotel. He himself says it. [01:01:05] He himself says it. In fact, his exact statement is this, [01:01:08] teacher, let's elaborate a little. He says, "I was following [01:01:12] all developments in Trabzon, I had gone to pick hazelnuts. [01:01:15] I came back and found myself in a hotel in Izmit. [01:01:19] A state official was waiting over us." He says, "There was security over us. [01:01:22] Even my wife didn't know, she was very angry." So much secrecy, [01:01:26] like an operation to kidnap a US President [01:01:30] in movies. I mean, you're just a council member, [01:01:34] what police, what hotel, what protection, one feels like saying, but [01:01:37] when you look at the result, of course, we are saying [01:01:41] this based on this statement. Did they leave the hotel, [01:01:44] did they travel, did they say "come, let's go"? We are saying this based on their statement that they stayed in a hotel. [01:01:48] So this is not a good thing. [01:01:51] But in between, while the very interesting votings continued, [01:01:55] as you know, it ended 21-21. The voting was postponed. [01:01:59] During the postponement, such [01:02:02] arrests happen to prevent them from voting. [01:02:06] I mean, it turned into an arrest after the detention period. [01:02:09] They coordinate those dates in such a way as [01:02:12] to prevent those in detention from voting. I mean, everything [01:02:16] has been calculated with delicate political engineering. Conversely, there's something else [01:02:20] that's strange. While the votes were being cast, two more people, who had not [01:02:24] resigned at all, supposedly had no contact [01:02:27] with the AK Party, two people who appeared to be CHP council members, [01:02:30] voted for the Justice and Development Party during the voting. [01:02:34] Now, of course, if they are new party members, [01:02:37] the new party members should also think, "How did we make these [01:02:40] people council members? Should we examine and scrutinize [01:02:44] more carefully from now on?" This is a lesson for the new party. [01:02:47] But after listening to [01:02:50] Mr. Tahsin's speeches, [01:02:53] he says, "This deputy mayor is political [01:02:57] bribery." Because if [01:03:00] you start out in the same party, for example, I'm the general [01:03:04] chairman, I'll say, "Ali, we'll work together, Ali Gökçek, come, let's work, [01:03:07] because we'll make you a general chairman responsible for local governments," [01:03:11] or "we'll make you a minister," that's something else. But [01:03:15] when you say to someone from another party, [01:03:18] "You appear to be from them, come to my side," this is political [01:03:22] immorality, a political betrayal, [01:03:25] call it what you will. When you look [01:03:29] at it, the court... for example, this is actually absolute [01:03:32] annulment, because you are sitting down [01:03:36] for a negotiation to corrupt an election [01:03:39] that has been won, using methods [01:03:42] outside of all political and moral [01:03:46] values and norms. Just like [01:03:49] the Justice and Development Party said about the CHP, "You abducted [01:03:53] people in pavilions, dollars flew around." [01:03:57] But what will happen if there's an objection? Let me tell you now. [01:04:00] The election is over. The court will say, "Well, it [01:04:04] would have been 23 to 20, or 22 to 20. [01:04:08] When one person is moved from there to here, the result doesn't change." It will reject it. [01:04:11] But this is important for going down in political [01:04:14] history, that if you said "absolute annulment" for a grand [01:04:18] 103-year-old party, then here in a district, [01:04:21] with some variations beyond absolute annulment, [01:04:24] social consent, I even remembered last week, [01:04:27] I said that it's as if the Justice and Development Party is saying, [01:04:31] "From now on, we want to govern not with consent, but with defect." [01:04:35] So a defect is created, and with that defect, [01:04:38] one way or another, it's already, [01:04:41] with these transitions, transfers, arrests, [01:04:44] and trustees, the balance that was 26 to 13 [01:04:47] after the March 31, 2024 elections has changed. [01:04:51] When you look at the district level, the AK Party is the majority in Istanbul. [01:04:54] And what is being talked about? Is this the gradual implementation [01:04:57] of a plan targeting the IBB? We made eye contact, [01:05:01] I think you wanted to add something. I find [01:05:05] the Justice and Development Party in power winning mayoralties through [01:05:09] such methods [01:05:11] extremely negative for the image of the government. [01:05:15] Doesn't it show a dilemma? [01:05:19] A political party led by Tayyip Bey, who is a master [01:05:21] politician and calculates the pulse of the people very [01:05:24] well, especially when [01:05:28] it's in power, [01:05:30] should not need such methods, I think. [01:05:34] Also, I must say this: [01:05:37] I have not attended any event [01:05:40] of Üsküdar Municipality until today. [01:05:43] I have not spoken with Ms. Sinem. [01:05:46] However, one Sunday, we were sitting [01:05:50] in a restaurant cafe within [01:05:53] the boundaries of Beykoz Municipality. It was packed, [01:05:56] people were having brunch. Ms. Sinem [01:06:00] was also sitting with her family [01:06:03] at one end of the very long cafe. Believe me, [01:06:07] more than 80% [01:06:11] of the people there went [01:06:14] and took photos with Ms. Sinem one by one. [01:06:17] I am speaking based on my observation, [01:06:21] she is one of the politicians, one of the mayors, [01:06:24] who has great public support. [01:06:27] And I claim, [01:06:31] if they release her from prison today, and a fair election [01:06:34] is held in Üsküdar where the ballot boxes [01:06:38] are protected by everyone, [01:06:41] by all political parties, Ms. Sinem will win there again. [01:06:45] That observation, all these things, but it [01:06:49] has turned into such a spiral. The continuation of these operations, [01:06:53] the continuation of these transfers, while increasing the resistance [01:06:56] of the opposition, of the social opposition, [01:07:00] also increases the pressure of the government. There is no move [01:07:04] that can be called a step back from either side. [01:07:07] Now, today we learned that the election of the deputy mayor [01:07:10] in Adalar will be cancelled, or rather, re-held. [01:07:14] It inevitably comes to mind, is the Adalar municipality [01:07:17] also in the pot, because there's a political [01:07:21] storm starting with "shake up the municipalities," Ali Bey. [01:07:24] You were also there during the Adalar elections. What happened there? Today I was in Adalar. [01:07:28] Today, [01:07:30] I also visited our deputy mayor, [01:07:34] who resigned. They are trying [01:07:38] to create a lot [01:07:39] of speculation about him. [01:07:42] Due to his problems, his sugar level actually reached 600. [01:07:46] We wish him well, and he experienced serious [01:07:49] health problems. Sugar rises with stress, by the way. Does he have stress? Of course. [01:07:53] It's not easy to manage cities. Both the city [01:07:56] and the city's problems, bureaucratic problems, [01:08:00] and political crises, all these events [01:08:04] have caused him distress. I wish him [01:08:08] well again from here. You asked, [01:08:10] "Is it targeting the IBB?" Let's look at it from the Üsküdar issue. [01:08:14] Now, the Mayor is naturally an IBB [01:08:17] council member. Let's see. [01:08:20] You took Ms. Sinem, one vote. [01:08:24] Okay. When you elect an AKP [01:08:28] member in her place as deputy mayor, [01:08:31] they will go to the IBB. That makes two votes [01:08:34] for the IBB. You also arrested [01:08:37] two IBB council members. That makes 4 votes. [01:08:41] And also, in that last [01:08:44] 21-21 vote, one of the two people [01:08:48] who voted for the AKP was an IBB council member. [01:08:50] That makes 5. This is the calculation for the IBB balance. [01:08:54] It's not just Üsküdar. Yes, there's a big [01:08:57] calculation regarding Üsküdar, but you asked if it's targeting the IBB. [01:09:01] The calculation is this simple. But [01:09:05] let me tell you, [01:09:09] because of that one IBB council member, [01:09:13] I will object to my professor here. You said, professor, [01:09:16] they need to examine and scrutinize carefully. You're right, [01:09:19] you're absolutely right. [01:09:22] But in 2024, council [01:09:26] members and mayors are determined. And each of us, [01:09:30] just like you would, paid attention to merit, [01:09:33] looked at their education, looked at neighborhood balance. [01:09:36] For example, we might not [01:09:39] be able to list a council member from every neighborhood [01:09:42] of Üsküdar, but most neighborhoods need to be represented. [01:09:46] They also need to be represented according to the demographic structure of Üsküdar. [01:09:50] You're forming a council. There should be an architect, [01:09:53] maybe an accountant too. Politics also has its own dynamics. [01:09:57] We write them according to what they allow. [01:10:00] While doing this, for example, [01:10:03] our deputy mayor of Şile [01:10:07] switched to the AKP. What were we supposed to do? [01:10:10] I apologize profusely, I received a warning from my director that we are having [01:10:14] a problem with your microphone. Let me continue with Mithat Hoca in the meantime. [01:10:18] So, Mithat Hoca, Ali Bey has made his introduction, but the political [01:10:22] climate we live in is enough to make one wonder [01:10:24] what's happening when a deputy mayor election will be repeated, [01:10:28] whether by court order or by your own decision. So, in such a political climate, [01:10:32] the election will be re-held in Adalar. Oh, why? [01:10:35] Because of health reasons. It was re-held by a previous [01:10:38] court order. The situation is clear. This election... [01:10:55] Justice and Development Party Deputy Chairman [01:10:57] Ali İhsan Yavuz, responsible for elections, [01:11:01] said the other day that even if we held elections a week [01:11:05] before the 2028 election, it would be considered an early election. [01:11:08] However, I don't think the economy will be able to handle [01:11:12] the normal election in 2028 a week before it. [01:11:16] In a previous program, probably Ebru Baki's program, [01:11:19] I said that in April or May, [01:11:22] around October or November, even a snap election [01:11:26] could happen in October or November. [01:11:29] But it didn't happen, so I was wrong there, [01:11:33] there was no snap election. My argument for that was [01:11:36] that considering President Trump's perspective [01:11:39] on the region, he would prefer [01:11:43] to continue with Tayyip Erdoğan or that the Justice [01:11:46] and Development Party and its leader remain in power [01:11:50] in his conceptualizations and schemes for Turkey and the region. [01:11:53] Therefore, I was saying that a snap election could happen [01:11:56] before Trump's decline, as he would likely lose [01:12:00] the Senate midterm elections in November, and before the economy [01:12:03] gets worse. Now that it didn't happen, [01:12:07] and the economy, in my opinion, will not be able [01:12:10] to sustain this until 2028, [01:12:13] so it could be in 2027. Now, let's say 2027. [01:12:16] It will happen in October of 2027, [01:12:19] so around this time next year, October or November. [01:12:23] During that process, I imagine that the Justice [01:12:26] and Development Party will have appointed [01:12:30] its own mayor or deputy mayor for the Istanbul Metropolitan [01:12:32] Municipality and will plan to proceed [01:12:36] in those coordinates. I'm thinking this in my head. [01:12:39] It might be true, it might not be, but... [01:12:55] it shows that this is moving towards the metropolitan area. In fact, [01:12:58] it should also be said that sometimes, [01:13:01] one needs to refer to certain references [01:13:04] in political science. Jürgen Habermas, I always say, [01:13:08] in the distinction between legality and legitimacy, [01:13:11] this is very important. If you give up consensus [01:13:15] and consent and try to manage political [01:13:18] dynamics only with court decisions, [01:13:22] then that place is not governed by the consent of the people. [01:13:25] It becomes a republic of cracks and actually turns into [01:13:28] a government of the minority, he says. It seems to describe today's [01:13:32] Turkey. You get a court decision from everywhere. Is it legal? [01:13:36] Since there are courts, it is legal. But is it legitimate? [01:13:39] It is not legitimate. For it to be legitimate, [01:13:43] I, Uğur Abi, Ali Gökçek, and all the cameramen friends here must internalize it. [01:13:47] If there's a problem with internalization, [01:13:50] if there's a problem with accepting it, then there is a legitimacy problem there. [01:13:53] Okay, [01:14:04] you look, someone from Keçi comes out at night, [01:14:08] the general chairman sends messages, gives negative answers, [01:14:11] you know, the one in Afyon goes to the other side, [01:14:15] Aydın becomes like that. I could list many more things, [01:14:19] but I don't want to bother you. So there was a rush here, [01:14:22] or certain factions within the party, [01:14:26] certain individuals nominated different candidates. [01:14:29] It seems there is no such homogeneity, no such meticulous [01:14:33] scrutiny. But it's not the end of the world, let this be a lesson. [01:14:36] Personally, if I were in this situation, I would say, "Yes, I'll do it differently next time." [01:14:40] I would do that instead of objecting. Okay, Ali Bey, you stayed. [01:14:43] Please, let me give an example with my professor again. [01:14:46] A thief broke into our house yesterday, professor. [01:14:50] He entered the house at night. I had locked the door from below. [01:14:53] And you're saying, "You explained it today." [01:15:18] Afyon group deputy. Look, this is my first term. I went to the parliament. [01:15:21] No matter how much politics you do, [01:15:24] there's a different bureaucracy there. There are things [01:15:27] you need to learn. Who do you watch? Your group [01:15:31] deputy chairmen sit in the front, right? You watch the group deputy chairmen. [01:15:35] Where and how they intervene, they are masters of the internal order, [01:15:39] how do they act? When I went to the parliament, [01:15:42] Ms. Burcu was my group deputy chairman. Of course, in her term as group deputy chairman, [01:15:46] in the weeks she was on duty in the parliament, the person I was trying to find out how it would be, [01:15:50] that person went to AKP, now how can we [01:15:54] filter? [01:15:57] The thing is, these people, there were 4 rounds of voting, in the first round, [01:16:01] two votes didn't come out, one vote went to AKP, so we came out as [01:16:04] 22 to 19 instead of 21 to 21, [01:16:08] I'm sorry, we came out as 22 to 20, [01:16:11] and it's clear who it is, our friend is clear, [01:16:15] I mean, I went [01:16:18] to our group room and was drinking tea at that time, we [01:16:21] go in and out, we chat with our friends, [01:16:25] those who use it come, I saw Mr. Onur's state, [01:16:28] I was sad, I was really sad and I thought something bad would happen [01:16:32] to him, I really thought he would have a heart attack [01:16:35] related to his health, God forbid something would happen, I told him this too, [01:16:38] I said Onur, I don't know what you went through, [01:16:42] I don't know what you chose between, [01:16:46] I said, brother, but you need to sit down and catch your breath, I'm [01:16:49] afraid something will happen to you, I said, today [01:16:53] he is open there. or he can remain silent, but [01:16:57] no one does this [01:17:00] like Tahsim Bey, Tahsim Bey, we passed, nothing [01:17:03] happened, he's comfortable, he's digested it, there are also [01:17:07] friends who do this without digesting it, I'm sad, but these people [01:17:11] don't just pass with incentives, I mean, when you see [01:17:15] that state of mind, yes, everyone expects [01:17:19] a character, a stance, but I also felt sorry for the person [01:17:22] I saw in front of me, honestly, maybe I will get a reaction from [01:17:26] our voters, why are you softening things or why [01:17:29] are you trying to empathize, they need [01:17:32] to stand firm, they own the will of the nation, I sign [01:17:35] under all of it, true, but I saw a person who was melted, [01:17:39] whose will was gone, we need to be interested in how he was brought [01:17:42] to that state, but when you look at it from one side, there are people [01:17:46] like Fatma Hürriyet Kaplan, Sinem Dedetaş who say "pashas [01:17:49] go", but what about the will, I mean, what about [01:17:53] those who melt away? I agree with my esteemed professor [01:17:57] from this perspective, in 2014, my children [01:18:00] won good schools for their high school education, [01:18:04] we went to Izmir, for a temporary period, that is, for their high school education. [01:18:08] In a beautiful city, in the middle [01:18:11] of a social way of life, so that [01:18:14] they could study comfortably on the road, [01:18:18] without wasting time in traffic, we went to Izmir, [01:18:21] immediately a rumor was spread that Uğur Dünder [01:18:25] came here to design the Republican People's Party. [01:18:28] I have never had any involvement [01:18:31] in active politics in my life. [01:18:35] I do not have such an intention. [01:18:38] No matter how much I said, I couldn't convince [01:18:42] them, but in the end, my children's education finished, [01:18:46] we came here, they studied abroad, [01:18:49] they returned, I will get to this point, the people [01:18:53] who said Uğur Dündar came to Izmir to design CHP [01:18:56] nominated the mayor of Foça, and in the district [01:18:59] where the Justice and Development Party did not enter the election, [01:19:03] he naturally went to the Justice and Development Party, of course, I will say. [01:19:11] Finally, let me say this, Mr. Uğur explained something very nice [01:19:14] about Ms. Sinem, I also went to Beykoz to see [01:19:18] what kind of interest there was, well, [01:19:21] all of our friends who showed that interest to Ms. Sinem [01:19:24] are now completely cursed, in quotation marks, [01:19:27] by society, those people cannot walk [01:19:31] in society anymore because Ms. Sinem, [01:19:35] those who showed those reactions, that interest, [01:19:39] will now show different reactions to [01:19:42] these friends, the friends who do this [01:19:46] should take this into account, especially to young [01:19:49] friends, I say it even more, I will finish this period, [01:19:52] I will close it, is the visible village such a village? I'm [01:19:56] asking about the islands, I mean, we saw this film, we saw [01:19:59] it in Üsküdar, we saw it in Bayrampaşa, we saw it [01:20:03] in Menemen, we saw it everywhere, we are experienced, now if a [01:20:06] deputy mayor election will be repeated in the Islands, the incident [01:20:10] that happened yesterday or in Menemen comes to my mind, here too, [01:20:13] transfers, I mean, like in films, kidnapping [01:20:17] members, hotels, security, etc. could it happen? It's [01:20:20] very new, so if I say something about it now, [01:20:24] we will look at everything in the same way, then what we experienced in Üsküdar [01:20:28] would seem baseless, what we experienced in Üsküdar was very [01:20:31] real, if we experience it in the Islands, we will tell [01:20:34] it with the same reality, but for now, I contacted our council [01:20:37] members, there is no problem with them, we are [01:20:40] standing where we are, only a decision [01:20:44] had to be made due to a health issue, now a new friend, I wish [01:20:48] Turkey wasn't in this situation so that we wouldn't have to [01:20:51] talk about someone who left because of health problems saying [01:20:55] "I can't do my job, let someone better do it", but you are [01:20:58] right, but I also talked to our council members [01:21:02] there, there is no such thing, I can [01:21:06] say something. Well, we shouldn't act [01:21:09] on an individual basis, because as I speak, of course, [01:21:12] Ali Gökçek, the New Party's MP, [01:21:16] will inevitably be on the defensive, but what I'm saying [01:21:19] is actually not a criticism of a party, [01:21:23] this could be another party tomorrow. What I'm saying is something [01:21:26] else, for example, Uğur Abi said: the Justice and Development [01:21:29] Party did not enter the election in Foça, the elected mayor [01:21:33] in the place where it did not enter the election says, "you [01:21:36] did not enter the election, but I will honor [01:21:39] you and crown you." Öz Ağa Bey, who was the former [01:21:42] mayor of a town, is protesting him, for example, [01:21:46] sevgili Ali Gökçek mentioned Beykoz, as far [01:21:49] as I know, it's not Beykoz, who brought him, why did they bring [01:21:52] him? Alaattin Köselar was arrested, he was elected, he was elected on Monday, [01:21:55] on Thursday he says he's joining AKP, can such a thing happen? [01:21:59] Well, okay, there can be such rotten apples, but what I wanted [01:22:03] to say here was something else, but there's no time, well, it's [01:22:06] full like this. The minute is running out, the [01:22:10] law on political parties needs to change, the mayor, [01:22:13] the MP, the members should elect them, [01:22:16] so that they will have a responsibility towards the society that elects them, [01:22:19] so that they will be ashamed, as long as they are not elected, [01:22:23] he says "the general chairman and my friends elected me", when [01:22:27] he gets a few harsh messages on the phone, he says "it's done, it's gone", when [01:22:31] someone sees him in the market, he says "aren't you ashamed, did you elect [01:22:34] me, did you put me there?", we need to get rid of this, let the members elect. [01:22:44] if it somehow becomes vacant, let the people elect again, we are also saying this, I mean, in this case, the real will [01:22:47] of the people should manifest [01:22:50] not only at the ballot box once every 5 years, [01:22:53] but also in some elections before the ballot box, [01:22:56] we say we will elect our district chairman, our provincial chairman, [01:23:00] our general chairman with our members, all our members, [01:23:04] that's what I'm trying to say, okay, now yesterday the Supreme Court. [01:23:20] a letter saying it cannot be used arrived today, the New Party's MYK [01:23:23] met and it was decided that the Constitutional Court's [01:23:26] decision would be awaited, and the Chief Public Prosecutor's Office [01:23:29] of the Court of Cassation needs to send a letter to the Constitutional [01:23:33] Court by September 18th. Finally, Mr. Dünder also has such a blockade, [01:23:37] that is, front after front, the inability to use the name, [01:23:41] can such a change, such a modification, be made [01:23:44] mandatory again? On the one hand, [01:23:47] it is spread over time. [01:23:50] spread over a certain calendar and if there is a snap election [01:23:54] during that time, will the new party not be able to enter the election? [01:23:58] Very advanced questions are coming now, I haven't talked to anyone, but [01:24:01] I think the new party has plans like [01:24:05] A, B, C, D for all possibilities, [01:24:08] it has made all its preparations, also, the Supreme Court's [01:24:12] making this notification is natural, [01:24:15] it is a duty it has to do, [01:24:18] however, when you look at their logos. "it turns out that the logos do not express [01:24:22] any similarity, moreover, there are many [01:24:25] political parties whose names start with justice, [01:24:29] there are a few political parties, [01:24:33] there are some political parties that start with republic, [01:24:37] therefore, it is natural to expect the Constitutional Court [01:24:41] to make a decision by looking at the logos [01:24:44] and evaluating and seeing the difference [01:24:48] and saying "new party". What do you say Ali Gökçek? [01:24:51] Now, at the MYK meeting, the Constitutional Court's decision [01:24:55] will be awaited, a name [01:24:58] change was not considered, but [01:25:01] the fact that everything has a reason, [01:25:04] that nothing in politics is accidental, [01:25:08] that every step taken is actually the infrastructure [01:25:11] of the next step, I mean, we've experienced [01:25:15] so many things in the last year and a half, we said [01:25:19] "this is because of this, this is because of that", and then [01:25:23] we witnessed many developments, the annulment decision is the most [01:25:25] concrete, the trustee decision that came to the provincial [01:25:29] chairmanship in Istanbul is the most concrete, so [01:25:32] it seems like a siege is continuing, by the way, [01:25:36] I agree with what Uğur hocam said, the move made [01:25:39] by the Chief Public Prosecutor's Office of the Court of Cassation [01:25:42] is a correct move, but on the other hand, for example, there is the CHP's [01:25:45] decision to withdraw its appeal, Müslüm Sarı announced it yesterday, what's happening? [01:25:55] First, if we come to the name issue, as Mr. Uğur [01:25:58] also mentioned, the Constitutional Court will decide, [01:26:01] but when the Constitutional Court examines this, [01:26:04] it does not examine it as "new party, innovation party, [01:26:08] names are similar", when it makes this [01:26:12] examination, it looks at its logo, [01:26:15] its abbreviation, furthermore, it looks at [01:26:18] whether the political [01:26:20] it evokes corresponds to the same thing, that is, it looks [01:26:24] at whether it makes the same associations, in the end, it examines [01:26:28] whether it can be confused when voting, it does not [01:26:31] examine similarity based only on names, [01:26:34] it will do this, we will continue [01:26:37] to use it, we think that the Constitutional Court [01:26:41] will make a decision in our favor here, [01:26:44] let's say it doesn't, let's say [01:26:47] today is so beautiful. "I read, while this conversation [01:26:51] was going on in the street, so many beautiful things, [01:26:55] whatever you call it, brother, we are following the path you took, [01:26:59] wherever you go, we will give way, we will vote for it, people [01:27:03] say, we will be with you, the nation gave this name, [01:27:06] if you change the name given by the nation, the nation [01:27:10] will give another name, and it will support that name, [01:27:13] this is not an issue that is currently [01:27:16] on our agenda, frankly, and the appeal [01:27:20] application, they have to withdraw the appeal application, why, [01:27:23] you ask? It is actually related to the Üsküdar issue, [01:27:27] it had nothing to do with it, but how is it related? A decision was made there, [01:27:30] annulment is one of the most [01:27:34] wrong legal decisions made in Turkey, we can say, [01:27:37] it's a strong statement, but it's really true, because this decision [01:27:41] has no precedent, for the first time in the history [01:27:45] of the republic, a political party was involved, and since it was [01:27:48] not in the political parties law, they couldn't find a reason [01:27:52] there, so they went to civil law and made an annulment [01:27:55] decision with forced reasons, if this is approved [01:27:59] by the Supreme Court, [01:28:01] it means that the friend who went [01:28:05] door to door in Üsküdar saying "hello, we are here now, [01:28:08] we are neighbors" will not be able to stay there [01:28:11] because it will set a precedent, it will set a precedent, [01:28:14] even if the Supreme Court makes this decision and [01:28:17] they withdraw the appeal application, even if we withdraw [01:28:21] our appeal application, the Supreme Court must [01:28:25] discuss this issue and eliminate this legal absurdity, [01:28:29] because if it doesn't, from now on, no [01:28:32] election in Turkey, neither an association election [01:28:35] nor a general election, can become official, [01:28:38] it cannot be finalized, the Supreme Court cannot approve [01:28:42] this, so did it take this step, this legal step, [01:28:45] to prevent this decision from reaching the Supreme Court? [01:28:48] Okay, then everyone knows that it has to be overturned, [01:28:52] from the moment the Supreme Court made this decision, there [01:28:56] is no longer a Supreme Election Board, [01:28:59] a court can make a wrong decision, that's why there [01:29:02] are higher courts, there is an appeal, there is the [01:29:06] Constitutional Court, etc. A court can make a wrong decision, [01:29:10] but if the Supreme Court approves this decision, [01:29:14] no election in Turkey can be finalized after this. [01:29:17] You can also make an application about an election 10 years ago, [01:29:21] we can also make an application about one 4 years ago. It won't [01:29:24] happen because it cannot be finalized. Furthermore, [01:29:27] after you approve this in the Supreme [01:29:30] Court, after Tahsim Bey's statement [01:29:33] in Üsküdar. "there must be an annulment there [01:29:36] immediately, what is annulment? The election must be cancelled, [01:29:40] if we say the election is void, then Ms. Sibel, [01:29:43] Sibel Can Çetinkaya must go back and sit in the Üsküdar [01:29:47] mayor's office, in my opinion, the annulment [01:29:50] decision that should be taken is for Ms. Sinem to come and sit [01:29:54] there, let's say for the last election, this must be removed [01:29:57] after Tasim Bey's statement, that's why [01:30:00] they wanted to prevent this decision from the Supreme Court, [01:30:04] but again, not the Republican People's [01:30:07] Party, even Özgür Özel as the party [01:30:11] affected, even if he withdraws the appeal application [01:30:14] he made, the Supreme Court must [01:30:17] discuss this legal absurdity for all previous and future [01:30:21] elections in Turkey and eliminate [01:30:24] it. CHP spokesman Müslüm says, "My dear professors, [01:30:28] they are withdrawing it to be able to start the general [01:30:32] assembly process. This is why we are giving [01:30:35] up this case, but they were saying there [01:30:39] is a precaution, there is a case in the Supreme Court, that's why [01:30:43] takvimi bir an önce başlatabilmek için biz bu adım attık [01:30:46] deniliyor eee ama kulislerde de ona [01:30:49] bakarsanız Kemal Bey de ben bu bullan olayının hiçbir yerinde [01:30:52] yokum diyor evet Şammir Bey de çıktı çıkacak dedi [01:30:56] bu karar için geçen gün tweet attı x hesabından benhurbaşkanı [01:31:00] da aynı şeyi söyledi evet. [01:31:03] "ben benzerlik var söyleme Uğur Bey derin bir nefes [01:31:06] aldı, siz söyleyince cümleyi hatırlat, [01:31:10] şey Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, butlanın içinde yokum, [01:31:14] hiçbir yerinde yokum dedi, bana [01:31:17] göre her tarafında var, bu benim şahsi [01:31:20] kanaatim, her tarafında onun rızası [01:31:23] olmadan hiçbir kimse yani [01:31:26] siyasette hiçbir adım böyle tesadüfi olarak [01:31:29] değerlendirilemiyor, şimdi pazar günü ben burada ana habermış. Cumartesi akşamı [01:31:33] üst düzey yargı mensubu dostlarımla görüştüm, karar hazır ekim ya da [01:31:37] kasım başında işte mutlak Butlan kararı yargıtaydan çıkacak. [01:31:40] Kemal Bey diyelim ki dediği doğru, eee [01:31:44] Butlan başvurusunun hiçbir yerinde yok. [01:31:47] Ama o süreçte çıkıp kamuoyunu [01:31:51] aydınlatan, kamuoyunun zihnine takılan soruları [01:31:55] cevaplandıran ve bunda tahlilinin olmadığını [01:31:58] ifade eden açıklamalar yapabilirdi. Kemal Bey hep [01:32:02] sustu. "kemal Bey'in suskunluğu bir [01:32:05] anlamda bir itiraf [01:32:07] niteliğinde. Kemal Bey Butlan davasının [01:32:11] her yerinde olduğunuy bizim 9 tane milletvekilimiz [01:32:15] parti meclisi kararı olmadan ihraç edildi, ben bunların hiçbir yerinde yokum [01:32:19] diyerek gelen partinin başına oturan birisi milletvekili ihraç [01:32:22] etmez. Olacak iş mi? Bizim il başkanlarımız ihraç [01:32:26] edildi, ilçe başkanlarımız ihraç edildi. Sayın Gökçek olmaz [01:32:30] dediğimiz çok şey oluyor. "bu da [01:32:33] olmaz dediğimiz çok şey oluyor, bu kadar [01:32:36] yeterli, o yüzden ben de size katılıyor, o [01:32:40] zamanlar yine programlarda konuşuyorduk, cumhuriyet halk [01:32:43] partisi iki tane kongre arka arkaya olmuş, 3 3 toplantısı 6 sene 6 sene [01:32:47] kongre kapatılacak diye, ben dahil yeni parti kuracaksanız [01:32:50] kurun, parti tümden kapatılırsa ne olacak ne diye [01:32:53] konuşuyorduk, şimdi orada apar topar yani böyle bu takvime [01:32:57] ve bu yasal sıkışıklığa bakarak yeni [01:33:00] parti kuruldu. eee şimdi o zaman gidenler [01:33:04] gitti, o zaman biz de şimdi onu geri çekelim, geri çekince [01:33:08] mutlak mutlan ne olacak, yargıtay kararını beklemeden kalacak, kendi kendilerini kongre [01:33:12] we cannot hold a general assembly, [01:33:15] so they are saying "we took this step to start [01:33:19] the calendar as soon as possible", but if you look at the backstage, [01:33:23] Kemal Bey also says "I'm not involved in this annulment [01:33:26] incident at all". Yes, Şammir Bey also came out and said [01:33:29] it would come out for this decision, he tweeted the other [01:34:26] to make the unheard heard, to say the unsaid, [01:34:30] to show the unseen. [01:34:32] when you say it, [01:34:40] From the street to politics, from the market [01:34:43] to the markets, from the stalls to the big market. [01:34:57] We will be together in this studio every weekday morning [01:35:01] from 7 to 10 while Turkey wakes up. [01:35:24] We are starting the second hour, uncensored, and [01:35:27] as of this hour, lawyer Ertun Çözün is also with us, [01:35:30] welcome Ertun Çözün, thank you for coming, now in the first [01:35:34] hour, we talked about the transitions, transfers, operations, [01:35:38] investigations, the notification that came through the name [01:35:41] that came to the new party, the new party's decision [01:35:45] not to change the MYK today and the CHP's [01:35:48] waiver of its appeal, but now the citizen [01:35:51] is of course following what is happening, [01:35:54] observing, making a reading, and public [01:35:58] opinion polls share those readings with the public [01:36:01] every month with their studies, now Gündemar is [01:36:05] one of the public opinion polls that is respected [01:36:08] and we often include the results [01:36:11] of Gündemar's research, he shares a striking [01:36:15] survey result. Regarding August, [01:36:18] we are in September, and when we look at it [01:36:21] comparatively, I'm talking about a research that has [01:36:25] striking results that make us say "what's happening?". [01:36:28] If there was a parliamentary election this Sunday, who would you vote for? [01:36:32] It's a classic public opinion poll question, and [01:36:35] in July, we saw the new party's vote share about 12 points [01:36:38] above the AK Party's. It had a vote share [01:36:41] of 38.58% to 27.43%. [01:36:45] And the AK Party was declining compared to June, [01:36:48] we are talking about a rate of 3.77%. [01:36:51] We came to this month, the August survey, [01:36:55] or rather, it was shared yesterday by the research [01:36:59] firm, and we see the AK Party in the first place this [01:37:02] time, and there is an increase of nearly 1% in its vote share. [01:37:06] Looking at the past month, the new party has a decrease [01:37:09] of approximately 12 points. Here, some parties [01:37:13] have also become active. like 8.21, [01:37:17] there is an increase of 3.65% [01:37:19] compared to a month ago, there is an increase in the votes [01:37:23] of the People's Party, there is an increase in the votes of the MHP, [01:37:27] but the CHP's votes are still below 5%, [01:37:31] meaning below the threshold, if there was an election this Sunday, [01:37:34] now Tamer Bolat, the director of the public opinion research [01:37:38] firm, an important figure, makes a sharing about these breakdowns, [01:37:41] he says that in July, they measured [01:37:45] the new party as the first party, this rate was important [01:37:49] not only for the initial interest in a newly established party, [01:37:52] but also for showing the level reached by the voter's [01:37:56] search for a new political discussed this in this [01:37:59] way. He says a strong start does not mean that a strong [01:38:03] political position is permanent. In the framework law vote [01:38:06] on August 10, Mr. Özel and the party management [01:38:10] voted yes, but the majority of the [01:38:13] deputies voted no, we will see in our August [01:38:16] research how this stance, called Havet in the public, [01:38:20] will affect the strong start created by the establishment [01:38:23] of the new party, he said, and [01:38:26] this table that emerged today, that is, [01:38:30] the 12% decrease in the new party's votes, [01:38:33] is attributed to the Havet stance by Tamer Bolat, [01:38:35] this is what we understand, it seems like a very [01:38:38] radical difference, such a one-point, [01:38:41] two-point, three-point always these researches. [01:38:57] I also find their results very important [01:39:00] and noteworthy, there are a few more like that, [01:39:04] but by the way, I think it's useful for the audience, [01:39:07] our readers, our followers to know that there are some [01:39:10] research companies that exist purely for manipulation [01:39:14] and will disappear after the elections, [01:39:17] and their purpose, I repeat, is manipulation. [01:39:21] Now, if you notice here, there is no significant [01:39:23] increase in the votes of the Justice [01:39:27] and Development Party, yes, [01:39:31] on the other hand, Mr. Özgür Özel's [01:39:34] saying yes in the "Turkey [01:39:37] without terrorism" vote, but [01:39:41] leaving the members of parliament free to vote no, [01:39:44] was not evaluated as they hoped [01:39:48] in the public, and as a reaction, the votes [01:39:52] somewhat shifted. [01:39:56] From [01:40:07] 4.56 to 8.21, it's a very striking [01:40:11] and radical increase, [01:40:13] the same goes for the Zafer Party, however, [01:40:17] I evaluate this as a conjuncture [01:40:20] choice, as long [01:40:22] as Özgür Özel and the new party members [01:40:25] share enlightening [01:40:28] information on this issue with the public [01:40:31] and explain their intentions, [01:40:34] this trend will revert to its former state, [01:40:38] because we see that the issues [01:40:41] that influence the public when saying no to the ruling [01:40:45] party have not changed at all. [01:40:47] The economy, directly the economy, [01:40:50] now you said when you opened the program that the price [01:40:54] of a liter of fuel approached 100 liras. [01:40:58] Yes, I mean, we will now [01:41:01] be talking about three-digit numbers [01:41:04] And in such an [01:41:07] economy, Mr. Mehmet Şimşek, [01:41:11] even if he were a wizard, the things he could do would be very [01:41:14] limited, because the fuel [01:41:17] hike affects [01:41:19] the entire [01:41:21] economic [01:41:23] circulation, especially road transportation. [01:41:27] It has a tremendous impact on our society, affecting the entire domestic market [01:41:31] from A to Z, from A to Z, [01:41:34] the fuel hike affects everything. Ms. Siğnem, I was recently [01:41:38] returning from the tour of the Gırgıriye [01:41:40] musical in Ankara. It was [01:41:43] 2 AM. Sir, we entered the [01:41:46] Marmara, North Marmara Highway. [01:41:49] Suddenly, I felt like I was [01:41:52] in Istanbul's daytime traffic. Trucks were passing [01:41:56] from the right. Trucks were passing, and we [01:41:59] were going so slowly, [01:42:03] almost in first gear, at 2 AM. [01:42:06] This kind of road transportation [01:42:10] is affecting the economy. [01:42:13] So, [01:42:16] no matter how hard Mr. Mehmet Şimşek tries, [01:42:19] and let's admit he is trying, or give him his [01:42:23] due, he is trying very hard, but as I said, [01:42:27] even if he were a wizard, it would be impossible to fix this under these conditions. They cannot cut public [01:42:30] spending, but Uğur Abi cannot do anything, which means he cannot get through to certain places, which means he does not [01:42:34] have a say in certain places. Yes, he does not have a say in certain places. We see this [01:42:38] in the headlines of some [01:42:41] of the pro-government newspapers, right, sir? Of course, we do. [01:42:45] Mr. Mehmet Şimşek is criticized even by [01:42:49] the AK Party prosecutors today. Mr. Mehmet [01:42:52] is an economist known for making the rich richer. [01:42:55] But in inflation, in societies with inflation, [01:42:58] this is inevitable. The [01:43:02] 119th richest get richer, the poor get [01:43:05] poorer. If there are 119,865 [01:43:08] official public vehicles in a country like Germany, and this [01:43:12] is only 12, then you should sit down and think. This [01:43:16] will not improve easily, unfortunately, it will not. Yes, yes, I mean, have you finalized [01:43:20] these July results, master? [01:43:24] I consider these to be conjunctural, because there is no change [01:43:27] in the factors and facts [01:43:31] that will affect the preferences of the people, [01:43:34] but on the contrary, the economy is deteriorating. [01:43:38] There is no dynamic that would [01:43:42] necessitate an increase in votes. Yes, the economy is still strong, despite [01:43:46] this turbulence, [01:43:49] despite this extraordinary rise in oil prices [01:43:52] due to the Iran war caused by [01:43:56] our friend Trump, there were no [01:43:59] wounds that we could call [01:44:02] as severe as that. Mr. Dünder made a very accurate [01:44:05] assessment, meaning the AK Party [01:44:08] did not create a dynamic that would [01:44:12] cause its votes to increase, but there is a slight [01:44:15] increase, and a significant decrease is seen [01:44:18] in the new party's votes, according to Gündem Ara and Tamer Bolat, who says, the [01:44:21] public opinion poll conducted in the first month, [01:44:24] it will become clear whether it is a result [01:44:28] of the excitement for a new party or people looking for an alternative. [01:44:31] Indeed, it seems to have turned out that way. How do you evaluate this, Mr. [01:44:35] Gökçek? Well, [01:44:38] if we were to say that based on this analysis, [01:44:42] the framework law was approved by our [01:44:45] Chairman and his administration, and some MPs voted no, [01:44:49] and they faced backlash for this, and [01:44:53] that this is an [01:44:56] invalid claim or assessment, [01:45:00] then we would be disrespecting [01:45:02] the reactions we received from our circles, from society, [01:45:06] and from our parties, as well as the sensitivities [01:45:10] of the entire society. Yes, we also received reactions [01:45:13] on this matter, that's true. [01:45:16] I even agree with this assessment. [01:45:19] A new party was formed, [01:45:22] a new excitement. Naturally, it is also true [01:45:26] that its votes are higher than expected in the polls. [01:45:30] This will settle down a bit over time, then it might rise again, [01:45:33] and perhaps fall again, but for Turkey, [01:45:37] it faced its first serious issue. [01:45:40] The new party was formed and immediately faced [01:45:43] a test regarding a 50-year-old problem [01:45:47] of Turkey. Here, [01:45:50] in his speech when our Chairman said yes, [01:45:53] he explained why we said [01:45:56] yes, even though we perhaps deserved to say no the most. [01:46:00] Of course, this may not have fully resonated [01:46:03] with society. Here, naturally, [01:46:07] everyone, the Republican People's Party, yes. [01:46:13] Seeing that some MPs voted no, they might have made [01:46:16] an emotional decision at first, [01:46:20] but I think when this is [01:46:23] explained properly to society, society will clearly [01:46:27] understand why the Republican People's Party made such a decision [01:46:31] for a new party. Why do I say this? [01:46:34] Because our district organizations are being established, [01:46:37] and we are visiting our district presidencies. [01:46:41] We are conducting field visits. For example, we said we would be in all [01:46:44] 81 provinces with all our MPs. I am going [01:46:47] to Ağrı tomorrow with our Istanbul MP, Türken Elçi. [01:46:51] In Ağrı, I am sure [01:46:54] I will meet citizens who ask why we said yes, [01:46:58] and citizens who ask why some MPs said no. [01:47:01] I believe we will be able to explain [01:47:05] very clearly to both types of citizens why we said yes and why we said no. [01:47:08] I think the MPs voted no, [01:47:24] and we will overturn this. Still, [01:47:27] stating all this upfront, the new [01:47:31] party's [01:47:34] loss of nearly 12% of votes [01:47:38] is truly interesting to me. I'm not saying there was [01:47:41] a distortion here, but every poll has a margin [01:47:45] of error. I think the margin of error is high here. [01:47:49] Why, Mr. Gökçek? Also, some citizens confuse [01:47:52] the Republican People's Party with the new party. [01:47:55] I believe that out of habit, they answer [01:47:59] "Republican People's Party." But if the pollster [01:48:02] insists and says, [01:48:05] "They separated, Özgür Özel founded the new party. The Republican People's Party [01:48:10] remained with Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu," then they say, "Oh, okay." [01:48:14] Something caught my attention on social media sometimes. [01:48:17] I see in street interviews, "If there were elections this Sunday, who would you vote for?" [01:48:20] A significant number of citizens say "Özgür Özel." [01:48:24] So, there is a segment that says "Özgür Özel" [01:48:27] directly, without mentioning the party name. But [01:48:31] of course, what you said is important. If we look [01:48:35] at the August poll, not July, [01:48:38] then something like this emerges. Now, the AKP and [01:48:42] MHP, who brought this bill. The AKP MHP, [01:48:45] who brought this proposal. They would have increased [01:48:48] their votes. It is very normal for the Dem [01:48:51] Party to increase its votes. Perhaps there were Dem Party [01:48:55] members who didn't think this process could be solved, but when it came to a solution, [01:48:58] they said yes and supported it again. But the MHP [01:49:00] base will do this. Moreover, let me tell you [01:49:04] something else. Ultimately, the New Party's [01:49:07] base and the Republican People's Party's base are [01:49:10] the same people. When we look at it, they just separated a month [01:49:13] ago and formed the new party, [01:49:16] and many Republican People's Party [01:49:20] supporters joined the new party, [01:49:23] as did different groups. And now, [01:49:26] the Republican People's Party increasing its votes by 2% [01:49:30] is a bit interesting here. Let's say AKP and [01:49:33] MHP were leading this, [01:49:36] and people reacted with something different, [01:49:39] then okay. While the new party and the Republican People's Party's base [01:49:43] think similarly, let's say, that close, [01:49:46] that intertwined, a 12% loss [01:49:49] there is a 5% loss [01:49:53] here, and we are talking about 5% of 2%, which is almost 40% [01:49:57] increase in votes, which is a bit interesting, honestly. Gökçek, [01:50:00] the Republican People's Party's votes [01:50:03] were determined as 4.99%. 1% [01:50:07] corresponds to 500,000 [01:50:09] voters, so it comes out to [01:50:13] about 2.5 million [01:50:16] voters for the Republican. [01:50:17] We see from its activities [01:50:22] that sometimes the halls are not full, [01:50:25] and it is clear from the public reaction [01:50:29] that we, public opinion pollsters and journalists, are also tasked [01:50:32] with reflecting the voice of the public, [01:50:35] and when we take that photograph, we do not encounter [01:50:38] such a reality on the streets. [01:50:42] Actually, the Republican seems to have shown a 100% [01:50:45] increase. [01:50:52] When July is taken into account, the new party's vote loss is 30% compared to the previous [01:50:56] rate, [01:50:59] because as Mr. Uğur said, there are still people who see the Republican People's Party with Mr. Özgür Özel, [01:51:03] or continue with their habits. Indeed, Mr. Ali just [01:51:06] mentioned the Republican. [01:51:07] But it does have some effect. [01:51:11] For example, if you say that all of the Republican People's Party's 4.499% [01:51:15] votes were given incorrectly, and you add them, [01:51:18] then the decrease would go down to 7.5-8%. [01:51:31] Before I came here today, I spoke with some Republican People's Party [01:51:34] members, and they also believe [01:51:38] it is conjunctural. [01:51:43] This is also true. For example, I spoke with a few pollsters, [01:51:46] or rather, not a few, but two poll company owners. [01:51:50] For example, in some polls, the Good Party [01:51:53] is seen at 8.21. There are those who show 9.16. There are also those who show 13.2. [01:51:57] 13.2. So, these kinds of deviations [01:52:01] in polls happen, of course. However, if we take [01:52:04] this as a reference, that is, if we base it on this table, [01:52:08] the Justice and Development Party seems [01:52:11] to have reached a saturation point, as they say, a satisfaction point. [01:52:14] That is, it is not 32-33. [01:52:18] Now, as you said, the moving [01:52:22] of the new party. Now, regarding the votes [01:52:25] of the new party, I totally agree with the "Turkey without terror" [01:52:29] framework law and so on, but I think here, it's not so much that the framework law [01:52:32] received a "yes," and I said "yes" and left my friends [01:52:36] free, but rather [01:52:39] that this is not about Turkey. This has been discussed. If [01:52:43] the voter, to some extent, follows this as carefully [01:52:46] as we do, then there hasn't been a terror incident [01:52:50] in Turkey for a long time. This is actually [01:52:53] about the American Ambassador's appearance, [01:52:56] and its drawing [01:52:59] within a perspective that covers the region. [01:53:02] In other words, Turkey will not only maintain peace [01:53:06] domestically, but also a hegemonic structure in Syria [01:53:09] and a hegemonic structure in Iran, and it is claimed [01:53:13] that it will be a country that has solved this problem in the region, [01:53:16] that it will be a country that has solved the problems [01:53:20] in the region, even if I don't [01:53:24] think so. The claim is that [01:53:28] the voter looks at it like this: this is a very [01:53:31] important issue, concerning Syria, Iran, Iraq, and all [01:53:35] of them. Then the main opposition must [01:53:38] have a homogenous view here. The general chairman thinks differently, [01:53:42] the party's MPs think differently. I think [01:53:46] that rather than yes or no, the main opposition, a party [01:53:49] that is a candidate for power, not having a homogenous pact [01:53:52] view plays a role. Sir, this table also shows [01:53:56] the impact of general polarization [01:54:00] on every issue. That could also be [01:54:02] the case. Now, regarding [01:54:05] a Turkey without terror, some [01:54:08] citizens want [01:54:12] it to be rejected. Yes, they want [01:54:16] it to be rejected. But when you look [01:54:19] at the realities, you see [01:54:23] that there are very important reasons to say yes. Therefore, [01:54:27] I believe that politicians, [01:54:30] even risking losing votes, must take [01:54:33] certain steps for the benefit of Turkey. [01:54:37] I evaluate that this polarization [01:54:40] in voter preferences is reflected. [01:54:44] You are right on that point. For example, the AK Party [01:54:47] always kept its distance from the process. [01:54:51] The AK Party kept its distance from the process. If there was a political risk [01:54:55] taken here, it was taken by the MHP leader, Mr. Bahçeli. From time to time, there [01:54:58] were decreases in vote rates according to these polls. [01:55:02] The most groundbreaking statements and steps [01:55:05] came from Mr. Bahçeli. Therefore, what you said is important. I also [01:55:09] agree on different ruptures, but this [01:55:13] didn't proceed gradually, that is, [01:55:17] in a way that would generate social consent and be explained [01:55:20] very well. It went too fast. For example, maybe it's not our topic [01:55:24] today, but for example, in an interview given by Devlet Bahçeli [01:55:27] to a journalist the other day, whose name I don't want to mention again, he said [01:55:31] things like houses are being built. For example, was Mr. President aware [01:55:35] of that? Was it said just like that? If it was said [01:55:38] without his knowledge, then did they want to accelerate [01:55:41] this process and involve Mr. President more like a catalyst? [01:55:45] That is, Mr. Bahçeli made these moves [01:55:48] at the right time, meaning "let's go." [01:55:52] He made statements meaning "let's go." And now, [01:55:55] this also means that we are talking about [01:55:59] summary executions here, aren't we? We are talking about [01:56:02] unjust arrests, [01:56:05] On the other hand, we are talking about [01:56:09] what a two-story mansion of a terrorist organization [01:56:12] leader will do. Now, [01:56:15] those who say no to this, those who say no, [01:56:19] have so many valid reasons that I think [01:56:22] not explaining this well and not generating social [01:56:25] consent is an important parameter. This is very, very important. This needs to be explained. [01:56:29] We are talking about Turkey's 40-year painful history. [01:56:32] If 40 years have been wasted. [01:56:35] Those under 50 don't know under what conditions [01:56:39] and how terrorism started [01:56:43] and what suffering it caused. But now, my dear Sinem, this is [01:56:46] only one aspect. For example, if there really [01:56:50] is this decrease, that is, it changes according to [01:56:53] each poll company. Also, I agree with Uğur Abi that this can also be conjunctural. [01:56:57] You never know what the next poll says. For example, the Good Party [01:57:01] here, the new party [01:57:04] is 38. There's no [01:57:07] 28. It's written incorrectly, [01:57:10] it's 26.95. Okay, 26.95. For example, if you look at the next poll, [01:57:14] it might show 32.43 in Gündem Hard, or 32.45. So it can be conjunctural, [01:57:18] but this is only one parameter. For example, [01:57:21] I hope that for example, [01:57:25] Greece has come to the island of Lesbos. I will be very brief. This is not [01:57:28] another topic. Yes, sir, there is also Ankara's research. Yes, for example, he came [01:57:32] to the island of Lesbos, Mitsotakis is showing off [01:57:35] there. He wants to besiege Turkey from Dedeağaç [01:57:38] to Crete. He signed the Achilles Shield agreement again [01:57:42] with Israel, and also with Southern Cyprus. [01:57:45] So, in the Eastern Mediterranean, exploration continues [01:57:49] in blocks belonging to Turkey. On the other hand, [01:57:52] there is still the 12-mile dispute. Now, if I were the new party, [01:57:56] I would say, "Turkey must immediately take initiative [01:57:59] in the islands whose status has not been determined." Look, [01:58:03] for example, on the other hand. [01:58:07] Of course, initiatives regarding Syria, or what does it mean? [01:58:10] We call on the government, we are behind you all the way, [01:58:14] let's act together. Turkey should immediately start natural [01:58:18] gas exploration in its own blocks in the Mediterranean. Don't exploit [01:58:21] the Mediterranean. Let's see how Turkey becomes a united [01:58:25] body when you raise the 12 miles. I personally hope [01:58:28] that they will also make moves in foreign policy. That is, [01:58:31] I want to say this without deviating from the topic. [01:58:41] Now, do you have anything to add here, Ertun Çözün, or should I continue with Ankara's? [01:58:44] Now, Ankara has also done a comprehensive study [01:58:48] regarding the voting behavior of voters who voted for the AK Party [01:58:51] in the 2023 elections, regarding voter reflexes. [01:58:54] I will share with you the results [01:58:57] of a very comprehensive research. Let's quickly [01:59:01] look at the details. Who would vote for the AK Party today, [01:59:05] who voted for them in 2023? One of the August 2026 [01:59:08] researches says that 64.9% [01:59:12] would vote for the AK Party again. Undecided protest [01:59:15] is 24%. This is important. There is a 10% [01:59:18] segment that says they would vote for other parties. [01:59:22] Now, when you put 24% [01:59:25] and 10% side by side, it points to a 35% [01:59:29] vote potential. This actually brings us [01:59:33] to the question of what would happen if there were an election this Sunday. [01:59:36] It is that gray area that will determine [01:59:39] the outcome of the election. How will the undecided [01:59:42] voters react at the ballot box? 10% [01:59:45] are asked which parties [01:59:58] they prefer to vote for. 1.8% say Dem Party, [02:00:01] 1.4% say MHP, the rate of those [02:00:03] who say key party is 1.1%, [02:00:07] CHP, meaning those who say my hand won't go to the six arrows [02:00:10] is 0.7%. Therefore, when you add [02:00:13] this table, the fact that the New Welfare Party [02:00:16] is 0.2% is very important. That is, [02:00:19] there seems to be no shift to the New Welfare Party [02:00:23] within the 10% group. And of course, [02:00:26] Ertun Çözün, let's continue with you. We always [02:00:29] talk about this, don't we? Will the most decisive voter [02:00:33] group in the next election be the undecided [02:00:36] and those who say, "I will no longer vote for my previous party?" [02:00:40] Does the table tell you this again? 40% of AK Party [02:00:43] voters, 40% are hesitant [02:00:47] to vote for the AK Party again, and even consider going to different parties, [02:00:50] 35%. That is, 35% are leaving. Yes, 35%. [02:00:53] That is, they have started to consider other parties. [02:00:57] We used to not see such large defections of 10%, [02:01:00] 15% from the AK Party. There would be changes [02:01:04] according to candidates or MP lists, but now [02:01:08] we are talking about 35%. That is, one-third of AK Party [02:01:11] members say, "I don't think I will vote for the AK Party again, [02:01:15] I am looking for another alternative." Yes. When you look at other polls, [02:01:19] actually, with the new party, there is a 30% increase [02:01:22] in opposition votes. That is, we are talking about 30-38% [02:01:26] at a limit that previously remained below 25%, not exceeding 25%. [02:01:30] If I combine and interpret with the previous poll, in the previous poll as well, [02:01:33] during that one-month period, now that we are speaking as lawyers, [02:01:36] what has changed in our country? Have arrests [02:01:40] changed? I just looked up what happened legally [02:01:43] or politically during those dates. Municipal [02:01:46] operations continued, arrests continued. [02:01:50] While these were happening, I think the sudden change of 6-7% [02:01:54] is just an instant reaction to a framework law. Perhaps [02:01:58] in the September-October polls, it will continue [02:02:01] in the 30% and above range. Indeed, we see the same [02:02:05] in the AK Party's votes. That is, 2.7% of the 10% [02:02:08] can go to the new party, but 2.7% is a very important [02:02:12] rate there, isn't it? It's as much as the Republican People's Party's votes. [02:02:15] I forgot to mention something very important about the previous poll. [02:02:19] Taking over municipalities [02:02:22] by the AKP using the methods we discussed earlier, [02:02:25] does not turn the ruling party into an attraction [02:02:29] area, a center of attraction. On the contrary, it caused [02:02:33] its votes, which were above 30%, [02:02:36] to fall below 30%. This might be why [02:02:39] the undecided voters within that 24% said, "This is too much" [02:02:42] after the Üsküdar election. That is, even those I know say, [02:02:46] "This is too much." Arrest one, transfer another, [02:02:49] detain another. You are directing the undecided [02:02:53] to the other side with your unlawful [02:02:56] judgments. Besides this, there is an economic reality. [02:03:00] There is an economic reality that is getting worse and worse. [02:03:04] These people no longer believe that the AK Party is the one [02:03:07] that will change things. It has started to decrease. [02:03:10] 35% of AK Party members themselves have decreased in this regard. [02:03:14] If it continues in this direction, I think that despite this decrease, [02:03:17] my graph will continue to jump up again. But [02:03:21] Ali Gökçek, now this 34%, that is, [02:03:23] when we add up the undecided protest and the voters [02:03:27] who switched to other parties, we get a rate of 34%. [02:03:30] Now, the voter says that 65 out of 100 AK Party [02:03:34] voters say, "I will vote for my political party again, no matter [02:03:38] the climate." But 35 people out of 100 say, [02:03:41] "Wait a minute, I am undecided, I haven't made my decision yet." [02:03:45] But what kind of position will they take when they go to the ballot box? [02:03:48] Will they react with a sense of party affiliation? [02:03:52] But 10% also say, "No, I'm done with the AK Party, [02:03:55] I won't vote for them again." And we see a 2.7% [02:03:58] new party tendency. How will this affect [02:04:01] it? Well, I was just going to look [02:04:04] on my phone, what was the AK Party's vote share [02:04:08] in 2023? 2023. Yes, what was [02:04:11] the AK Party's percentage? [02:04:14] 30%. One minute, 30. [02:04:18] 30-33? 32.8. [02:04:22] Let's take it from 83 for easy calculation. [02:04:25] Let's make 165 66%. That is, two-thirds, [02:04:29] two-thirds of it makes 22%. We are talking [02:04:32] about the August poll. In the previous August poll, the AKP [02:04:35] was shown as 28%. In the previous company's August [02:04:39] poll, that's why there can be differences [02:04:42] between companies and polls. But there is something there, [02:04:45] my dear. [02:04:49] From the undecided voters, for example, 24-25 [02:04:51] or close to 30. If we consider one-third of the undecided to be distributed [02:04:54] equally among the parties they received, you need to add that too. [02:04:58] We won't be able to distribute that 60 in the same proportion, but [02:05:02] this time, I don't know, but 24 is not a small number. [02:05:05] Okay, if we divide that 24 equally [02:05:09] among the political parties here, how many are there? 3, 5, 7, [02:05:12] 10. If you put two points each, it becomes a distribution [02:05:16] close to 5%. Sir, now regarding [02:05:19] the new party, if we come to the new party's 2.7%, [02:05:22] this will increase much [02:05:26] more because it's still new. we are just [02:05:30] starting to explain what the party wants to do in economic [02:05:33] terms, in agricultural terms, in health, in national [02:05:36] education, in foreign policy, what it [02:05:39] aims to achieve. Our congresses are still ongoing, [02:05:43] and after these congresses settle down [02:05:46] and our establishment process is fully completed, we will explain [02:05:50] what we want to do. Now, in the 2023 [02:05:53] elections, I never forget, I always tell the story, [02:05:56] I went to a cafe during an election [02:06:00] visit. It was both an association and a place that people [02:06:03] used as a cafe to sit. I said that after the election, [02:06:07] diesel would be 20 liras. An elder brother came up and said, [02:06:10] "Don't even start talking if you're going to lie to us. [02:06:13] It won't be 20. Come here and tell us what [02:06:16] you're going to do yourself." He said, "It won't be 20, don't come to us with these [02:06:20] things." Today, diesel is 96 liras. [02:06:24] So, imagine that when I said [02:06:27] it would be 20 liras, there was a crowd that reacted [02:06:31] to me like that. It became 96 liras, and [02:06:34] right after the election, it was already 20 liras, that's a separate issue. [02:06:38] When we come to this, seeing this and [02:06:41] still having only 10% of the AKP voters [02:06:44] go to other parties, I think is a good [02:06:48] result for the AKP. I don't think [02:06:51] they can manage this until the election. Moreover, [02:06:55] the undecided [02:06:57] voters, yes, we can distribute a certain percentage of the undecided, [02:07:01] but there is no reason [02:07:03] for the undecided to start tending to vote for the AKP [02:07:07] again. Oh, wait a minute, let me make a note of this. [02:07:11] Under normal circumstances, we conduct [02:07:14] a survey. After asking about all parties, [02:07:17] a group of undecided voters emerges, and we distribute a certain [02:07:21] proportion of those. But we are asking among those [02:07:24] who are undecided about voting for the AKP, [02:07:27] who previously voted for the AKP. There's nothing to make them [02:07:30] tend to vote for the AKP again. Here's the thing: [02:07:34] if you don't provide alternatives, people might turn [02:07:38] to the AKP again. This is where we see the effect [02:07:42] of the new party being new and not having fully [02:07:46] explained itself to the public. As time [02:07:48] progresses, there will be shifts from 24% to 10%, [02:07:52] and those shifts to 10% will be in favor of the new party. [02:07:55] Professor Mithat, please. Of course, [02:07:59] there is something called voter behavior, which is a separate discipline. [02:08:02] We take our associate professorship exam on voter behavior. This [02:08:06] is one of the important aspects of political sociology. [02:08:09] Now, if we are speaking arrogantly as we talk about voters, [02:08:12] I hope our professors will excuse us. No, not at all. Now, [02:08:16] it's like this: there's no such thing as saying the 24% undecided [02:08:19] won't go there, which goes against statistics. [02:08:23] If a voter doesn't find a very strong alternative, they say, "I won't [02:08:26] give up," just like despite diesel reaching 96 liras. [02:08:29] "Two-thirds of those who voted for the Justice and Development [02:08:32] Party haven't budged. They haven't budged, two-thirds of them. [02:08:36] They say, 'I'd rather die than give up.'" Look, when we can't solve [02:08:39] this, we're just talking in vain. We need to solve this. [02:08:43] Where does it stem from? It means we're not explaining [02:08:46] something well. I always emphasize that we're not explaining something [02:08:50] well. Even if I explain the whole lesson, if the class average is [02:08:53] 32-38, I'm blaming myself, not the students. [02:08:57] It means I'm not explaining it well, they're misunderstanding something." [02:09:01] I'm explaining it incompletely. However, Professor, [02:09:03] let's not forget the existence of a significant segment [02:09:07] of society whose lives and living standards [02:09:09] depend on the Justice and Development Party being in power. [02:09:13] Also, election expenditures and election promises will [02:09:17] influence undecided voters. For example, the main [02:09:20] target, 4,863,000 families receive aid. [02:09:24] 4,860,000 families. When you look at it per person, [02:09:27] 17,785 people [02:09:30] directly receive aid, money, coal, pasta, bags, and various aid. [02:09:33] There are 20 million people in Turkey, and 50-55 million voters. [02:09:37] You enter the election with about 23%. Now, for example, [02:09:40] we discuss this on television, right? In the media. [02:09:44] Okay, the entire media's weight isn't on the side of the opposition, [02:09:47] but opposition channels attract a stronger audience [02:09:51] than other channels, just like we're doing tonight. [02:09:55] For example, the IYI Party doesn't use the media at all. [02:09:58] It's the same as the new party. 2.7% of the 10% [02:10:02] who said they wouldn't vote for the Justice and Development Party came to the new party, [02:10:06] and two went to the IYI Party. This is essentially [02:10:09] something. So, in its [02:10:12] distribution, it should be around 4.8 for the new party, [02:10:16] I think. The others should be around 1.2, [02:10:19] 0.8. So, I don't understand this. [02:10:23] The fact that 65% of the segment is staying [02:10:26] in the same place, saying "I'd rather die than leave," [02:10:30] isn't that a sign of a change in government? [02:10:33] It's not enough. Now, most of it [02:10:37] is done with... there's also this parameter: it's done by phone. [02:10:40] State officials... "If I'm not going to vote for the Justice [02:10:44] and Development Party, I can say AKP, or Justice and Development Party, because [02:10:47] most of these are done by phone. We take that into account, [02:10:51] but here, the people wait five more years [02:10:55] with hope, they wait five more years. We no longer have the patience [02:10:58] to wait. All of us, we live in this country. [02:11:02] I am also trying to make a living in this country. I also want [02:11:05] to look to the future with hope. I want every student I teach [02:11:09] to stay in this country without leaving. So, [02:11:12] we need to get out of this without making a mistake. [02:11:15] In that respect, I'm saying this: for example, let's [02:11:19] not get stuck on this being just a framework law. You need [02:11:23] to have something to say in foreign policy, which we will, [02:11:26] which is good. You need to have something to say in the economy, and just saying [02:11:30] it isn't enough. You can't just say 'I will give every retiree at least [02:11:33] the minimum wage.' You have to tell them where you'll find the resources [02:11:36] for all of this. You'll tell them like a pill. You'll go door-to-door, [02:11:40] explain it. For example, if the general chairman is to be elected by members [02:11:43] at the congress, you'll show everyone as an example [02:11:47] how democracy is being extended. Everyone will take you as an example. [02:11:50] If all these can be implemented quickly, there's still a big [02:11:54] chance, I think. But if there's such inertia and [02:11:57] internal party conflicts, nothing will happen. [02:12:01] And of course, politics is about power. [02:12:04] Power politics, they say, is about power. Why am I saying [02:12:08] this? For example, 26 municipalities [02:12:10] were taken over illegally, of course... [02:12:16] 16 of them have been taken, for example, [02:12:18] Üsküdar. [02:12:23] Now, if I were the general chairman, I would quietly protest with 500,000 people, without [02:12:26] hurting anyone, without shouting, without injuring anyone. [02:12:29] I would quietly protest. Don't leave for three days. [02:12:32] Sit on the pavements at Üsküdar Municipality, I would say. [02:12:36] This needs to be a more effective protest. [02:12:39] Something is being discussed there. 3 days, 5,000 [02:12:43] people gave support, then they dispersed. Another operation in another [02:12:46] district is being discussed, but 1, [02:12:50] 2, 8, 11, 14, 16 have gone. Now the voters also [02:12:53] see this. You won, but the voters are tired, Professor. [02:12:57] Mr. Özel might not be aware of this, or he might be. [02:13:01] I mean, telling the voters to go and wait there for 3 days, then go and wait [02:13:04] at Saraçhane, then go to Istanbul University, then go with your diploma... [02:13:08] the citizens are tired. But there were over 100 rallies. [02:13:11] They filled all of them. So, [02:13:14] if directed, the voter participates. [02:13:18] I'm saying all these things so that this entire [02:13:21] opposition wave can be better united [02:13:25] and grow within the framework of law. I understand. [02:13:28] Now, one of the most talked about names in recent days [02:13:32] is the Mayor of Ankara Metropolitan Municipality, Mansur Yavaş. [02:13:35] After his visit to the President at Beştepe last week, [02:13:38] especially with the ongoing investigation against him, [02:13:42] he might join the AK Party, or even İsmet Büyükataman, [02:13:46] one of the prominent figures of the MHP, if I'm mistaken, Alper should [02:13:49] correct me. He wrote an article saying, "Don't be surprised [02:13:52] if he joins the AK Party tomorrow or the day after." Today, Abdülkadir Selvi, [02:13:56] one of the journalists known for his closeness to the government, [02:14:00] shared his predictions regarding Mansur Yavaş's roadmap [02:14:04] and wrote an article. My director, Murat Erdoğan, the article... [02:14:08] Was it Yıldıray Çiçek? Sorry, I apologize to Mr. İsmet. [02:14:12] It was Yıldıray Çiçek. He said, "No one should be surprised [02:14:15] if he joins the AK Party tomorrow," Yıldıray Çiçek said. [02:14:18] Abdülkadir Bey says that many things are being discussed [02:14:21] in Ankara's political circles regarding Mansur Yavaş. It is said that he said, [02:14:25] "I don't want to go to prison at this age." And he [02:14:28] justifies this as follows, [02:14:31] Mr. Selvi: "Until the official application period for presidential [02:14:35] candidacy begins, I will not put myself forward. When the justice application [02:14:39] begins, no one can arrest me. At that time, society will say, [02:14:42] 'He was arrested because he was president.'" It is said [02:14:46] that he says, "I will not be the candidate of just the CHP [02:14:50] and the new party, I will be the joint candidate of the opposition, [02:14:53] the CHP, the new party, the IYI Party, and the Victory Party." This is the [02:14:57] backstage information he shares. Ali Gökçek, [02:15:01] wasn't he saying something while saying nothing? Now, "I will be arrested [02:15:04] when I become a presidential candidate." I think the issue should [02:15:08] move beyond Mr. Mansur now. Is there really not [02:15:11] a bigger point in this article? Yes, [02:15:15] I brought it up for that reason. Why is Mr. Mansur [02:15:18] saying that his not wanting to go to prison [02:15:20] is related to his presidential candidacy or his prominence [02:15:24] in politics? This is being discussed [02:15:26] in Ankara's political circles, and Abdülkadir Bey [02:15:29] is bringing it to his column. So, when you become a presidential [02:15:33] candidate, I'm sorry, let me ask my question. Does it mean [02:15:36] you get arrested when you become a presidential candidate? So, he will be called [02:15:40] in for questioning for writing this article, [02:15:43] and perhaps arrested. There are many, [02:15:46] and I'm saying this in quotation marks, genuine opposition journalists [02:15:50] who, when they write this, when they express this, are taken [02:15:53] into custody and arrested for publicly [02:15:57] disseminating misleading information. What does this mean? [02:16:00] Are we now going to associate people's presidential [02:16:02] candidacy [02:16:06] or their pursuing a more effective and prominent political [02:16:09] career with whether they go to prison [02:16:13] or not? Are we going to manage that process accordingly? [02:16:16] If we are discussing this in Turkey, then nothing else is needed. [02:16:20] So, according to Abdülkadir Bey, Mansur Yavaş [02:16:24] has made a decision. I'm not talking about his [02:16:28] statements, but he says, "I won't go to prison, [02:16:31] so I will announce my presidential candidacy later." For example, [02:16:35] the Mansur Yavaş I know would want to be the joint candidate [02:16:38] of the CHP, the New Party, the IYI Party, and the Victory [02:16:41] Party, that's correct. But Mansur [02:16:45] Yavaş would also want to be the candidate of AK Party voters, [02:16:48] if you ask him, and MHP voters. [02:16:52] Let's not look at this as parties. [02:16:55] Let's look at it as parties. Mansur Yavaş would want to be [02:16:58] the candidate of people who feel they are MHP members. Mansur Yavaş [02:17:01] would want to be the candidate of people who feel they are new party members. [02:17:05] I mean, Mansur Yavaş wouldn't want to be the candidate of the general [02:17:09] chairmen of these parties, would he? Isn't every politician like that? [02:17:13] If I were to run for president, I would want to be the candidate [02:17:15] of all party members. This is a very natural thing. [02:17:18] But what does "I don't want to go to prison" [02:17:21] mean? Mansur Bey wouldn't say that anyway. [02:17:25] "If he were to embark on such a path, he would already take that risk. [02:17:29] But in Turkey, why should someone who wants to be a presidential [02:17:32] candidate risk going to prison? Why aren't we asking this question? [02:17:36] That's the real question here. Abdülkadir Bey is already prompting [02:17:40] this with his article. He says, "I shouldn't put my head out now. [02:17:44] Let my politics be defined by serving the Ankara [02:17:47] Metropolitan Municipality. Regarding the roadmap, [02:17:51] believe nothing you haven't heard from me." [02:17:54] "Very good. If I become a candidate, I will be arrested." [02:17:58] I mean, isn't [02:18:00] leading to such a conclusion? I mean, in this country, [02:18:04] does a presidential candidate get arrested then? Should we understand this from [02:18:08] this? Again, this question, he himself is not making this [02:18:12] comment, he's attributing it to people, saying [02:18:15] "this is being discussed in Ankara." He is making such an assessment. [02:18:18] Well, I agree with Mr. Gökçek. [02:18:21] So, the statement "if someone becomes a presidential [02:18:25] candidate, they will definitely go to prison" should not be normalized. Yes, [02:18:29] in fact, no pen that shapes [02:18:32] public opinion serves its purpose. [02:18:35] As he said, if we, [02:18:39] as individuals known as opposition [02:18:41] figures, were to write such a thing, [02:18:45] an investigation would probably be launched against [02:18:48] us immediately, and for publicly spreading false [02:18:52] information, [02:18:54] whatever is necessary would be done. [02:18:58] As I said, I was in Ankara on Sunday, [02:19:01] two Sundays ago. I first went to Ankara [02:19:05] in 1970. Believe me, [02:19:09] of course, I admit that the preparations for the NATO [02:19:12] summit would play a role in this, [02:19:16] but I was captivated by the city [02:19:19] of Ankara. Mr. Mansur has done a very successful [02:19:23] job as mayor. [02:19:25] "Not only members of the new party, not only CHP members, [02:19:29] but also those who voted for the ruling party, [02:19:32] IYI Party members, and members of other parties [02:19:36] would vote for such a successful mayor. Moreover, [02:19:40] Mr. Mansur, with his rhetoric, [02:19:43] is not someone who has ever expressed [02:19:46] fanatic partisanship. He has always, [02:19:50] since becoming the mayor of the metropolitan municipality, [02:19:53] made embracing speeches to all Ankara residents. [02:19:57] He makes statements. We need to look at Mr. Mansur [02:20:01] in this way. I mean, when you expand [02:20:04] Mr. Mansur's success from the Ankara scale [02:20:07] to the entire country, it really shows that [02:20:10] he is a very important figure. Mr. Mansur [02:20:13] is a very successful mayor. [02:20:16] I don't think Mr. Mansur [02:20:19] would be [02:20:23] experiencing fears, as Abdülkadir Selvi suggests. [02:20:26] Already in the polls, he gets 5-6% [02:20:30] of the votes from the Justice and Development Party as well. [02:20:33] When he becomes a presidential candidate, Justice and Development... [02:20:37] Professor, I was captivated by Ankara, of course, but what [02:20:40] your words were interrupted, [02:20:44] and you want to continue, the problematic [02:20:48] is being written. I mean, the fact that it's being talked about [02:20:52] that a presidential candidate in this country goes to prison... [02:20:56] Look, what did Ms. Özzem say? She said, "I can't live in 12 square meters," [02:20:59] and then she joined the AKP. What did they tell [02:21:02] our Bayrampasa Mayor? Two days ago, they called him. [02:21:05] A day before, they called again. [02:21:08] They said, "I love you, brother. Look, there's an operation against you. [02:21:12] Come join our party." He said he wouldn't budge. [02:21:16] Today, they are prosecuting Hasan Mutlu with 700-800 years [02:21:20] in prison. These will all happen. [02:21:23] In the municipalities that joined the AKP last time, [02:21:26] there are no operations. Those who didn't join [02:21:29] will be prosecuted with 700-800 years. Someone will join the AKP [02:21:33] because they said they couldn't stay in 12 square meters. [02:21:37] Our presidential candidate will be arrested on the day [02:21:40] we nominated him in the pre-election, after asking all citizens, [02:21:43] in a pre-election where 15.5 million people voted. [02:21:47] His image, his voice, his social media [02:21:50] accounts, all of them [02:21:53] will be banned. His defense will be banned. [02:21:56] The book he wrote to publicize his defense [02:21:59] will be banned. It won't be enough. [02:22:02] The tea he drank while waiting for the hearing [02:22:06] at the courthouse he went to ask a question from [02:22:09] will be banned. The league match he watched [02:22:12] will be banned. Yes, these will happen. [02:22:16] And then, someone considering presidential [02:22:19] candidacy will have to risk going to prison, of course. [02:22:22] An article like this comes out here, this understanding [02:22:25] comes out. Saying "I don't want to go to prison" [02:22:28] means that if you're thinking of running [02:22:32] for president, you'll have to risk going to prison. [02:22:36] The mere writing of this is... [02:22:47] Director, please, [02:22:47] can I request [02:22:52] the article again? Look, he says, "Many things are being talked [02:22:55] about in Ankara's political circles about us." He says "talked about," [02:22:58] meaning hearsay. "It is said that he said, 'I don't want [02:23:02] to go to prison at this age.'" We don't know if it's true or not. [02:23:05] If it's true, then [02:23:08] this means suicide. If it's true, it means political [02:23:11] suicide. But if it's not true, and [02:23:14] I believe it's not true, if it's not true, then it's not [02:23:18] subliminal, Mr. Selvi is sending an open message: [02:23:22] "If you don't pledge allegiance, you'll go to prison." Can such a thing [02:23:25] be true? In fact, this is what is desired. [02:23:29] For example, if we were to ask the audience now, is there a similarity [02:23:33] between the article written by Abdülkadir Selvi about Mansur [02:23:36] Yavaş and the repeat election in Adalar Municipality? [02:23:39] What common ground would emerge? To intimidate people [02:23:43] into reconsidering even the thought [02:23:46] of candidacy. To make the opposition [02:23:49] unable to find a candidate, to strip them of candidates. [02:23:52] Now, I don't think [02:23:55] Mansur Yavaş would say such a thing because [02:23:58] it would be political suicide. But here it clearly [02:24:02] states that you must pledge allegiance and do what they say. [02:24:06] Now, this is something that can be discussed, it's such [02:24:09] a conjuncture that incidents are happening in Üsküdar Municipality, [02:24:13] arrests are still continuing in many district municipalities. [02:24:16] Within this whole conjuncture, why did the President say [02:24:20] "come immediately" when Mansur Yavaş requested an appointment, [02:24:23] not for the 9 September founding anniversary of the Republican [02:24:27] People's Party? This needs to be evaluated. [02:24:30] Okay, let's talk and finish the second hour. I'm asking [02:24:34] Uğur Dündar for another half hour, as you were supposed to leave at 22:00, but it's important. [02:24:37] We will discuss an important [02:24:49] topic shortly: which public institutions and organizations give advertisements [02:24:52] to which television channels, according to whom, and on what basis? [02:24:56] Mahmut Tanal, New Party Deputy [02:24:57] for Şanlıurfa, asked, but Şimşek did not answer. [02:25:50] Şahin, I would like to say [02:25:51] hello to you too. [02:25:54] Your voice is not coming through. It would be great if you could turn on your microphone. [02:25:58] Now, at this hour, we have an issue to discuss, [02:26:02] and we would like to hear the opinions of dear Bengü [02:26:05] and our other colleagues on this matter. Now, [02:26:08] the advertising budgets that institutions and companies [02:26:12] operating with public funds allocate to television [02:26:16] channels have now become a matter for parliament. [02:26:20] The new party's Şanlıurfa deputy asked Şimşek [02:26:23] in a parliamentary question: "Which public institutions [02:26:26] and organizations' advertisements are you distributing to which [02:26:30] television channels, according to whom, and on what basis?" [02:26:33] Mehmet Şimşek's answer came as an interesting one. [02:26:36] May I request his answer, dear director Murat Erdoğan? [02:26:40] The question is: "What is the annual distribution [02:26:43] of advertising and promotion budgets transferred to television [02:26:46] channels by Turkish Airlines, Ziraat Bank, Halk Bank, [02:26:50] Vakıfbank, Botaş, and other companies with majority [02:26:53] public capital in the last 5 years, broken down by institution [02:26:57] and channel? Which objective criteria [02:27:00] are taken as a basis when determining advertising [02:27:04] and promotion budgets? For example, are ratings, reach, target [02:27:07] audience, cost, effectiveness analysis, and independent media [02:27:10] planning reports taken into account?" Mehmet Şimşek shares the joint [02:27:14] answer of the three banks. The banks in question state: [02:27:18] "The sharing of publicly [02:27:29] disclosed bank financial data is not possible as [02:27:33] it is considered a bank and customer secret [02:27:36] under articles 73 and 159." [02:27:39] Now, I don't understand this, dear Bengüşap Babaeker. [02:27:43] Mahmut Tanal isn't asking how much money each person has in these banks. [02:27:47] Yes. He's asking which channels [02:27:50] these bank advertisements go to, and why. What's wrong with sharing this? [02:27:53] Now, they base it on two articles of the banking law. We looked [02:27:57] at both, and they're irrelevant, because no one's asking how much money [02:28:01] anyone has, what they did, what their profit or loss is. [02:28:04] We are asking about the expenditure item [02:28:08] that should be the most transparent. Now, you have a product, [02:28:12] and you want to sell more of it, reach [02:28:15] more people, and earn more money, right? [02:28:18] What will you do for this? You will promote [02:28:22] yourselves in the channels that reach the widest [02:28:25] audience. You will advertise. We would think these [02:28:28] organizations do the same. Where should they [02:28:32] advertise to reach more people, earn more, [02:28:35] and reach more customers? On the most-watched channel. [02:28:39] Now, if we are talking about news channels, [02:28:42] Halk TV is Turkey's most-watched news channel. [02:28:46] There is only one measurement institution, and according [02:28:50] to its calculations, Halk TV is always first. [02:28:53] Halk TV has not received any advertisements from public [02:28:56] institutions for 5-6 years. So, on what basis are you giving [02:28:59] them? Now, Mahmut Tanal also asked this: on what basis [02:29:03] are you giving them? He talks about objective criteria, [02:29:07] but there are no such objective criteria, because they are not [02:29:10] giving their advertisements to the most-watched televisions [02:29:13] or newspapers that would reach the widest customer base. [02:29:16] To whom are they giving them? To the channels that [02:29:20] broadcast the government's agenda and spread government propaganda. [02:29:23] So, public funds [02:29:26] are being transferred to only one group. [02:29:29] What is the income from these advertisements? This is not [02:29:33] an advertisement, it's a transfer of funds, because where do banks [02:29:36] our taxes, you also pay that tax, Mr. Uğur also pays, I also [02:29:40] pay, millions watching Halk TV also pay, we pay the same [02:29:43] tax, there is a pool [02:29:47] formed from everyone's taxes, accumulated in public institutions. And [02:29:50] isn't it true that they protect and support the pro-government [02:29:54] media, those pro-government media channels, in quotation marks, [02:29:58] that resources are transferred, resources are clearly transferred, [02:30:01] and other, like Halk TV, independent [02:30:05] broadcasting organizations, the free media, [02:30:08] are being punished. They are being put in an economic [02:30:11] squeeze, you are being deprived of these resources, meaning these [02:30:15] resources are not distributed equally. [02:30:18] We don't even want equality. "We want it to be fair, [02:30:21] look at the ratings, if we don't have [02:30:24] ratings, if we don't have viewers, then don't give it," [02:30:27] it's said. So, the criterion here is not ratings, [02:30:31] we understood that. The criterion here is actually whether you are broadcasting [02:30:34] under the guidance of the government. Now, there's an interesting thing [02:30:38] in the answer here that probably caught Mr. Dündar's attention: [02:30:42] three banks are mentioned. It says, Ziraat Bank, Halk Bank, [02:30:45] Vakıfbank. Mr. Dündar makes a joint statement [02:30:49] on their behalf, Mr. Şimşek but he doesn't mention Turkish Airlines [02:30:52] and Botaş at all. He clearly hasn't fully understood [02:30:56] the issue of bank accounts, Mr. Şimşek. So, nobody's [02:31:00] deposits there are being questioned, but... Hey, and there's no [02:31:03] answer for Botaş in this reply. Why do you think not? [02:31:07] I agree with Ms. Bengü's statement, [02:31:09] and I will add one more point. [02:31:13] Halk TV is first [02:31:16] in ratings among [02:31:19] news channels. [02:31:22] But maybe they can say, "Brother, [02:31:25] you may be watched a lot, but [02:31:28] for us, viewers with high purchasing power [02:31:31] are important." If they say, "We take [02:31:34] this as a basis," then Halk [02:31:37] TV is watched by all electoral [02:31:41] strata, all citizen strata, [02:31:45] especially by citizens with high purchasing power, [02:31:48] in the same way. In all categories, [02:31:51] Halk TV is always [02:31:54] first. Therefore, I agree with [02:31:58] Ms. Bengü again, the pro-government [02:32:01] media is subsidized with public [02:32:05] resources. Yes, in democracies all [02:32:08] over the world, especially newspapers supporting [02:32:12] the government do not sell much. Opposition [02:32:15] newspapers gain prestige and are in demand, [02:32:19] because journalism, by its very nature, [02:32:22] involves opposition. Everything, when everything is [02:32:26] fine and rosy, it's not news. [02:32:29] Anything that is malfunctioning, broken, [02:32:32] and needs to be fixed is news, and [02:32:36] journalists reflect these for the public's right to [02:32:40] know the truth. Thus, with [02:32:43] the transfer of public resources to pro-government [02:32:46] media, Halk TV, which actually [02:32:50] deserves to benefit from those resources, [02:32:53] has real ratings, and always maintains [02:32:56] its first place in all categories, [02:32:59] is being punished. Therefore, Halk TV [02:33:03] viewers are also being punished, and of course, it's impossible [02:33:06] for us to accept this. I absolutely do not agree with [02:33:10] Mr. Şimşek's assessment. Public resources are also, [02:33:14] as Ms. Bengü said, your money, my money. But it says it's a public [02:33:18] resource secret, meaning our editorial policy can support pro-government [02:33:21] newspapers, but this is a [02:33:24] choice and a patronage choice. The owner covers it [02:33:27] from their own pocket, subsidizes [02:33:30] it. But when it comes to the distribution [02:33:33] of public resources, it is the primary [02:33:37] duty, the main duty, of those who use [02:33:39] those resources to be fair. Ms. Benkö, it's [02:33:42] not transparent, it's not auditable. This is [02:33:46] clear, I understand that from this answer. So, these institutions, [02:33:49] based on what, give advertisements? We can't [02:33:52] ask that, we can't audit it, it's not transparent, it's not fair, isn't that his admission? [02:33:56] You ask, but you don't get an answer, for example, in fires, [02:33:59] opposition MPs submit motions for questions, [02:34:10] The advertising expenditure of only two public banks in the [02:34:14] first three months, Mr. Uğur, is 1 billion 65 million [02:34:17] lira. 1 billion 65 million lira, from this, [02:34:21] not a single lira went to Halk TV. For example, where [02:34:24] did the advertising and promotion expenditure go? It went to [02:34:28] televisions that are never watched, to newspapers that are never [02:34:31] read, never read at all. [02:34:35] What are 73 and 159, Ertuğun? What does it say here? [02:34:39] Bank and customer secret. We are not asking about customer secrets, [02:34:42] right? So, could Mr. Şimşek have misunderstood? I mean, trying [02:34:46] to deflect the issue by bringing up articles [02:34:49] of law that are not related to the content of the issue, about [02:34:52] privacy and trade secrets. But the incident in question [02:34:56] here is different. It's not a question that falls under [02:34:59] personal data protection, Mr. Tanal, so a customer... "Stating [02:35:03] how many minutes of advertising was given to which channel [02:35:07] is not a trade secret at all, it's not a banking activity [02:35:10] at all. As you just gave an example with the parliamentary [02:35:14] question, you ask this, and for a state institution to say, 'this [02:35:17] channel received this many minutes, that channel received that many minutes', there is no legal obstacle to [02:35:21] that, Professor. You know, there's no need for an official statement. A few months ago, when there [02:35:25] was the transition to 5G technology, a campaign was run, [02:35:28] did you see how much advertising was given in that campaign?" [02:35:32] institutions and where did they give it? Did you [02:35:36] see a single second of advertising on Halk TV screens? [02:35:40] There was a tremendous transfer of resources for that 5G transition, [02:35:43] and all institutions ran huge campaigns. Again, [02:35:46] it's visible even in that campaign where these [02:35:49] advertisements are going. Ali Gökçek, you took notes, [02:35:53] but do you have anything to add? Well, let's say the first [02:35:56] question was not [02:35:58] answered. Let's say it's a trade [02:36:02] secret about which television channel the money was transferred to. There's another question that says, [02:36:06] "what criteria is this based on?" Why [02:36:09] is this a trade secret? I don't understand that. For example, [02:36:12] Mehmet Şimşek could have given [02:36:15] an answer like this: "The amount transferred to a television [02:36:18] channel is a trade secret, however, when we determine [02:36:22] these channels, we base it on such and such criteria." [02:36:25] This is not a trade secret, but the reason he cannot [02:36:28] give an answer is that there are no [02:36:31] neutral criteria. There is no [02:36:34] criterion to explain why no advertisements, [02:36:37] not even one lira, are given to a television news [02:36:41] channel that ranks first in every rating, [02:36:43] in every measurement. So, there is no such [02:36:47] criterion. And because there is no such criterion, [02:36:50] they hide behind trade secrets, as they do with all our questions. [02:36:54] But honestly, these places are not anyone's father's companies. [02:36:58] There is no such thing as a trade secret when we are talking about a public bank. Also, there is this: how [02:37:02] can you create a competitive environment [02:37:05] and give cheaper advertisements [02:37:09] without negotiating with all channels and getting [02:37:12] advertising prices from them? If you don't do this, then isn't there a public [02:37:16] loss here? If it's a public bank, then if these banks [02:37:19] belong to all of us, by not creating competition, [02:37:23] you are also creating a public loss here. Perhaps [02:37:26] for a one-minute advertisement, while you pay 100 liras there, [02:37:30] you could reach more people for 90 liras, perhaps more [02:37:33] people for 50 liras. They are hiding behind [02:37:36] the excuse of being [02:37:39] a trade secret, but as we all know, as you have [02:37:42] also said... They use public resources [02:37:46] to feed their crony channels, and public banks and public [02:37:49] institutions are the best examples of this, because as you [02:37:53] asked, the trade secret [02:37:56] is over. Furthermore, private banks, let's say [02:38:00] a private bank was defrauded by an x businessman [02:38:03] to whom they gave a loan. I [02:38:06] don't think this is a newsworthy [02:38:09] event. Between two people or the bank [02:38:13] and that swindler... it is actually [02:38:16] an indication of a judicial [02:38:19] process that needs to be carried out, meaning it's an issue [02:38:22] that needs to be resolved in court. But when it comes [02:38:25] to siphoning off public bank resources or [02:38:29] distributing their resources, [02:38:31] this concerns us greatly, [02:38:35] because public resources consist of money that belongs [02:38:38] to the unfeathered orphan, meaning [02:38:41] it's the money of the whole nation. Therefore... [02:38:45] "To give the nation's money fairly to those who [02:38:48] deserve it means having superior [02:38:51] leadership qualities. Yes, so this is a joint [02:38:55] statement on behalf of the three banks. As I said, no statement was made on behalf of Turkish [02:38:59] Airlines and Botaş. So, is it also a trade secret for Turkish Airlines, [02:39:03] for example, where it advertises and to whom? Or for [02:39:06] Botaş, which is one of the other companies with a majority [02:39:09] of public capital. Why can't we know which channel [02:39:13] Turkish Airlines' advertisements are for and based on what?" [02:39:17] reply is so nonsensical, Sinem, I mean, it's so nonsensical, [02:39:21] they just gave them a random file. I mean, generally, Mr. [02:39:25] Ali knows this too, in recent years, this is the fate [02:39:28] of all parliamentary questions. Most of them are not answered at all. [02:39:32] Those that are answered, they just say "secret" [02:39:34] and move on. They answer half of it, a quarter of it, and they answer [02:39:38] it incorrectly. Anyway, thank you very much, Bengü Şap, general [02:39:41] director of halktv.com, thank you for your contribution. [02:39:45] While she's here, I can also say a couple of things, if [02:39:49] she has two or three more minutes. I mean, it's not really [02:39:52] my area of expertise, but [02:39:56] sit down [02:39:58] in the evening, I zap through the channels, I look at them. For example, [02:40:01] many have opened YouTube, for example, any [02:40:05] channel, five or six people sitting around discussing [02:40:09] a political issue, it says 56 people are watching. Now, [02:40:12] if he tells his wife, his children, his neighbors, [02:40:24] it would be 150-200 people. For example, this comes to my mind: [02:40:28] the state gives treasury aid to political parties, right? There's a [02:40:31] condition for that. Okay, good, there's a good condition, you must have received at least 3% [02:40:35] of the votes, you must have been established such and such time ago, etc. Now, [02:40:38] if you are giving a reward for getting 3% of the votes, [02:40:41] then take the viewership rates here, calculate the monthly [02:40:45] average. In all groups and categories, A, B, AB, etc., look, [02:40:48] distribute it equally according to that. It's that simple, Professor. [02:40:52] Professor, if these public banks or public [02:40:56] institutions had given advertisements to Halk TV, Mr. [02:40:59] Mehmet Şimşek would have proudly [02:41:03] explained the answer to this question, of course, [02:41:06] because the fact that these advertisements [02:41:09] were distributed fairly would have emerged. [02:41:12] As I said, Halk TV is watched a lot, [02:41:15] and it is watched by viewers from all [02:41:18] segments of society, from those with high purchasing [02:41:22] power to all layers of society, in every category. [02:41:25] When you look at it objectively, when you evaluate [02:41:29] it with an outside perspective, it becomes [02:41:33] clear that Halk TV is the organization that [02:41:36] should receive the most public advertisements among news [02:41:39] channels. Now, there are huge public banks, let's [02:41:43] not list their names one by one. Here, they offer salary promotions, [02:41:46] trying to tie pensioners to themselves. Ordinary citizens deposit, businessmen deposit, [02:41:50] the businessman who pays his taxes has deposited his money in that public [02:41:53] bank. The ordinary pensioner goes and gets his salary, [02:41:57] but if these people watch Halk TV, why shouldn't [02:42:01] they see the advertisement of the bank they have been working [02:42:05] with and have shown loyalty to for years? No, of course, [02:42:08] I, for example, get my retirement salary from a public bank, [02:42:11] but that public bank does not advertise [02:42:14] on Halk TV. If this is not unfair, what is? [02:42:17] Also, Mr. Uğur, those who make this decision are public [02:42:21] employees, meaning they will be responsible for even 1 lira [02:42:24] of public money. You must state according to what [02:42:28] criteria you made the payment. As you mentioned earlier, [02:42:31] if millions of liras in advertising money [02:42:34] are given to a channel watched by 56 people, this is a matter [02:42:38] for criminal investigation. So, by what decision did you do this? By what criteria [02:42:42] did you give this person so much advertising, so much allowance? Because the money [02:42:45] you gave is public money. There would be a heavy punishment, a trial [02:42:49] for this. So, we need to speak considering these. Why did we [02:42:52] go all the way to the Swiss banks and uncover Engin Cıvan's, [02:42:56] the General Manager of Emlak Bank, bribe account [02:43:00] and headline it as "Document of Bribery"? Because, [02:43:03] as I said, he was the General Manager of a public [02:43:07] bank, which held the rights of the unfeathered [02:43:10] orphan, and he was responsible [02:43:12] for siphoning off the public [02:43:15] bank's money. Well, thank you very much, Bengü Şap. [02:43:18] Thank you for your contributions. We are saying goodbye [02:43:21] to you. Thank you very much. Şükrü Şahin, do you have [02:43:24] anything to add to this issue? [02:43:27] Of course, I mean, Mr. Uğur also stated, [02:43:31] look, in the past, [02:43:33] even when many important news stories were made [02:43:37] that were perceived as negative for these banks or any [02:43:41] institution or political institution, it was not [02:43:44] possible to have such a reduction in advertising [02:43:48] sharing, I mean, reducing public institutions' [02:43:51] advertisements to broadcasting organizations, because [02:43:55] this would gather a lot [02:43:58] of reactions. Moreover, [02:44:01] these news stories were considered [02:44:03] as a fundamental principle of journalism. [02:44:06] Today, if you are doing [02:44:10] journalism that propagates the government's understanding, [02:44:13] then you deserve advertisements, [02:44:16] especially from public institutions. [02:44:19] But if you are not acting [02:44:23] in the understanding of "Her Majesty's Opposition," [02:44:26] then you don't have the right to advertise. [02:44:29] This actually means destroying the public's [02:44:33] right to information. This means destroying [02:44:36] journalism, destroying journalistic [02:44:39] ethical principles. In this way, you [02:44:42] are directing journalists towards a single type [02:44:46] of understanding, and we have experienced many [02:44:49] examples of this. We see, unfortunately, [02:44:53] that all broadcasting organizations that receive [02:44:56] advertisements use the same headlines and the same news. [02:44:59] And unfortunately, the government, especially [02:45:02] the AK Party government, we did not see such [02:45:05] examples in previous periods, [02:45:08] has also taken the path of controlling [02:45:11] the media by benefiting unfairly [02:45:15] from the advertising pie. This is both an unfair [02:45:18] practice and an practice that destroys [02:45:22] journalistic principles, but most [02:45:26] importantly, as I said, [02:45:30] it is a situation that prevents. So, Mehmet [02:45:33] Şimşek's answer [02:45:35] is a very sad answer, to be honest. I mean, [02:45:38] we can't seem to see those expected [02:45:42] rational moves from Mehmet Şimşek, [02:45:44] Ms. Sinem. He could even [02:45:48] have said, "There is war [02:45:52] around us, there are crises. Because of these [02:45:55] crises, the opposition channel should also give [02:45:59] us money, because they cannot see how much [02:46:03] we are struggling in this crisis." He could [02:46:06] also think that. But of course, I'm making a joke, [02:46:09] I admit it's a bad joke, but unfortunately, [02:46:12] this is the situation we've reached. Today, the media, [02:46:16] which you discussed in the first part, is why, [02:46:20] it is for that reason [02:46:23] that from the media or column writing, if you become [02:46:27] a presidential candidate in this country, [02:46:30] you should fear imprisonment, [02:46:34] you should experience the feeling of being incarcerated. [02:46:37] If one of those who gives you [02:46:40] this is the media, if it's given through [02:46:44] the media, then it's truly a [02:46:47] media profile rarely seen or unprecedented [02:46:51] in the world. It's a very sad [02:46:54] situation, but Turkey [02:46:57] has come to this state regarding media [02:47:00] in the last 20 years, they say, "It's a shame, [02:47:03] it's a sin." Indeed, it is a shame and a sin, [02:47:07] and the people are again the losers, [02:47:13] because inflation calculations would never have been criticized [02:47:16] until today, and people would [02:47:20] not have seen how minimum wages and retirement [02:47:23] pensions were calculated low, just with [02:47:26] a simple example. Please, Ertun Çözün, [02:47:30] we are talking about the media, we are talking about the unequal [02:47:33] distribution in the media. I just saw [02:47:36] Abdülkadir's post, no, when we saw [02:47:39] his article, Mr. Bey also said, Ali Bey too, if an opposition [02:47:43] figure had done this, a file would be opened for openly spreading [02:47:47] misleading information. Because you are talking about the threat [02:47:50] of prison with a presidential candidacy. And today, Mansur [02:47:54] Yavaş's press consultant shared a post saying, "These are [02:47:57] entirely Abdülkadir Selvi's fantasy." And Abdülkadir [02:48:01] Selvi himself reposted it, meaning he accepted it. [02:48:05] Despite that, there's nothing about his post, right? But [02:48:09] if an opposition journalist had done the same, "let's [02:48:12] say it was evaluated within the scope of press [02:48:16] freedom. I wish the opposition was also viewed that [02:48:18] way, and Abdülkadir's denial [02:48:21] made by the press consultant of the Mayor [02:48:25] of Ankara, sharing it on his own social [02:48:28] media account, let's consider it as [02:48:31] responsible journalism. Yes, make a correction. In fact, [02:48:35] Ms. Sinema, let's look at this issue in this way: [02:48:38] it is a concrete indicator of how the [02:48:41] power of the parliament has fallen, [02:48:45] especially after the transition to the presidential system. [02:48:49] For this reason, was it possible, Mr. Uğur also remembers [02:48:53] well, for an MP to ask a question and the minister [02:48:56] not to answer it within 15 days, and not to answer [02:48:59] it with the correct information? But today, I saw the other [02:49:03] day, no statement was made. For example, the Minister [02:49:06] of Justice, it hasn't been a year yet, has it? 900 questions [02:49:10] have been asked, but no question has been answered [02:49:14] yet. For example, this is actually an indicator [02:49:17] of how much the respect of the parliament or the [02:49:20] supervisory power of MPs has been reduced. Mehmet [02:49:23] Şimşek's failure to answer this question is also a [02:49:26] very concrete example of how much the parliament's [02:49:30] power has been reduced. Thank you. Now, one of the hot letters, [02:49:34] notes, and issues of politics. [02:49:37] Meanwhile, my editor Alper [02:49:40] sent me a message. Okay, soon, Serra Karaçam will give [02:49:43] us an important note from the United States. But until [02:49:47] then, until she's ready, statements continue to come [02:49:51] from the AK Party Headquarters regarding the candidacy [02:49:54] of the President. After the President used the [02:49:57] phrase "upcoming elections" in his hometown of Rize, [02:50:01] while there was a debate about whether there would [02:50:04] be an early or snap election, Erdoğan's candidacy [02:50:07] was also opened to [02:50:10] debate once again. For example, Alihsan [02:50:14] Yavuz, the Deputy Chairman in charge of Electoral Affairs, [02:50:17] stated that there is no legal or constitutional [02:50:20] obstacle to Erdoğan's candidacy, and that he [02:50:24] can be a candidate again for the 2028 elections, [02:50:27] which will be brought forward by a week in the parliament. [02:50:31] Today, Abdülhamit Gül, one of the important figures [02:50:34] and group deputy chairman, made a statement. If I'm [02:50:38] not mistaken, in visual 8, Mr. Gül says: [02:50:41] "One of the important consensuses of our nation [02:50:43] is that our President continues his path as [02:50:47] President and leads Turkey to a stronger leadership. [02:50:50] I believe that this demand and expectation of our [02:50:54] nation will find a response in our Grand National Assembly. [02:50:57] We have full faith that the expectation of our [02:51:00] nation for our President to be re-elected as [02:51:03] President will be met with the decision of our Assembly." [02:51:07] He points to the parliament. Now, we all know, more or less, that [02:51:41] within a month, it emerged with [02:51:44] one of his articles. Correct, [02:51:48] Tayyip Erdoğan doesn't need to be re-elected. [02:51:52] However, it emerged with the idea that Turkey [02:51:56] needs to re-elect Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. [02:51:59] Mehmet Bey generally starts these things, [02:52:03] regarding throwing out an issue, and then other AK Party [02:52:07] officials follow. Here, [02:52:10] they are talking about taking the MPs to early elections. [02:52:14] This is a method [02:52:17] of inviting our Grand National Assembly, as [02:52:21] Abdülhamit Bey said, our Grand National Assembly, [02:52:24] to a trick, nothing else. We determined the constitution. [02:52:28] When we determined the constitution, [02:52:31] no one, even our president at the time was [02:52:34] known, but they said we do [02:52:38] not find it right for Recep Tayyip Erdoğan [02:52:41] to be president more than twice. Was the AK Party [02:52:44] not in power when this constitution was determined? Was the AK Party [02:52:48] not in power when this article [02:52:50] was written? Why was this article put there today? [02:52:54] In the country, something different develops, and [02:52:58] MPs need to dissolve the parliament. In that [02:53:01] case, the presidential term can be done again, [02:53:05] it is not considered the second. They say, "Okay, [02:53:08] very good." Today, he says that they are trying [02:53:11] to circumvent the criterion they set themselves, [02:53:15] that it shouldn't be done more than twice, with a trick. [02:53:18] "We wrote this constitution, we determined it. We also [02:53:21] think that it is not right for a president [02:53:25] to serve more than twice. inviting him to elect a third term, [02:53:28] this is the discourse. Why don't they openly say it? I mean, [02:53:32] no, Turkey needs it. Turkey doesn't need Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to be a candidate [02:53:36] again, brother. [02:53:38] Since you introduced the Presidential system [02:53:42] in 2018, name one thing that has gone well in the country. [02:53:45] In health, education, or economy, [02:53:49] we see what state we are in. Since 2018, not one thing has gone well. [02:53:52] There is nothing. Does it need to happen again? Turkey doesn't need such a thing. [02:53:56] Turkey needs change. The Grand National Assembly does not need to make anyone president [02:53:59] again by violating the constitution through a trick. [02:54:03] Mr. Abdulhamit Gül's discourse, of course, [02:54:06] may be consistent for him, [02:54:09] but he is inviting the assembly to a trick. [02:54:12] Now, Professor Mitat, actually, in the media [02:54:16] close to the government, when the election issue comes up, [02:54:20] calendar-wise, it's either November 2027. [02:54:32] One of the two necessary conditions for him to be a candidate again is either a constitutional amendment [02:54:36] or an early election decision. Now, when the President used the phrase "approaching elections," it was asked if an [02:54:40] early election was on the horizon, but today, Ömer Çelik said after the MYK [02:54:43] meeting that there is no election on our agenda, so [02:54:46] amendment. So [02:54:50] all these things are now being said louder. [02:54:56] I don't think he will take the risk of a constitutional amendment. This is also possible, [02:55:00] but what seems more likely to me is that [02:55:03] when he says "we are going to an early election," the opposition will say, [02:55:07] "Where did this election come from? Are you running away from the election?" So, when he puts forward the early election [02:55:10] thesis, everyone may have to accept it. [02:55:14] Therefore, 360 [02:55:17] will be found, so when the parliament makes a decision, [02:55:21] you know, the mileage. In 2018, they reset it, the clock was reset, [02:55:25] 2014-2018 was not counted. [02:55:27] 2018-2023 is the first term, [02:55:31] 23-20... 28 is the second term. [02:55:34] If he gets an early election in the second term by parliamentary decision, he can be a candidate [02:55:38] again. Therefore, since the mileage started [02:55:41] in 2018, when the parliament finds 360 [02:55:45] and makes an early election decision, no legal obstacle is seen, [02:55:48] even if it is controversial in terms of legitimacy. Three dots side by side. [02:55:53] But now, he says, for example, his words are very important, [02:55:56] "This demand of our nation," Abdülhamit Gül's "this demand [02:55:59] and expectation of our nation, I believe, will be met in the Grand National Assembly." [02:56:02] So, they will bring an early election to the parliament, [02:56:05] meaning the constitutional amendment is frozen. [02:56:09] Of course, now what can happen? For example, what [02:56:13] argument can they use, my dear Sinem? Now, if you strain [02:56:16] your memory, about a year and a half ago, Mr. Mehmet Uçun, [02:56:20] the chief advisor responsible for law, said [02:56:24] durum falan dedi bu çok önemli [02:56:27] especially those interested in political science [02:56:30] and political sociology know this well. [02:56:34] There is a very famous political sociologist named Carl Schmitt, who lived [02:56:38] in the 1930s. Carl Schmitt has a thesis of exceptional [02:56:41] situation. Sometimes, in any [02:56:45] state, while the parliament is open, that is, [02:56:48] while the political mechanism is operating within a democratic order, [02:56:53] "such exceptional situations occur," he says, "that you can fill in the blanks: a regional [02:56:56] crisis, a war, any tension. At that time, [02:56:59] the sovereign is actually [02:57:03] the one who decides." "That is, the parliament [02:57:06] and everything can decide without going through [02:57:09] the whole process. In this exceptional situation, the one who decides is the sovereign, [02:57:13] and they must decide." This thesis has actually paved [02:57:16] the way for more authoritarian regimes. Now, these are being taken off [02:57:19] the shelf again, Carl Schmitt is being rewritten, and doctoral theses are being written [02:57:23] on it. Now, I don't think Mr. Mehmet Uçun used this [02:57:26] coincidentally. So, we should actually look not only at [02:57:30] internal dynamics but also at external dynamics in such an election [02:57:33] process. These external dynamics must [02:57:37] be observed very carefully. I also agree with my professor. [02:57:41] Also, in Turkish politics, the perspective [02:57:44] of those in power [02:57:48] is "yesterday is yesterday, today is today." So, [02:57:51] "we will do what today requires." And [02:57:55] this never changes. Did you finish? [02:57:58] Yesterday was yesterday. Ah, yes, yes, by the way, [02:58:02] the new party's Istanbul Deputy, thank you very much [02:58:05] for your contributions. We will be saying goodbye to you. I will turn to Mr. [02:58:08] Küçükşahin. Don't look at your watch, you are still here, [02:58:12] I see. I see to the left when I look to the right. Ali Gökçek, I will say [02:58:15] something for about 15 seconds. Of course, please. [02:58:19] I mean, when talking about the new party, [02:58:22] especially in our democracy, it's the first time [02:58:25] that a political party has been established from scratch and has reached [02:58:28] such a high vote share in such a short [02:58:32] period. This fact [02:58:35] should never be overlooked when evaluating [02:58:38] the new party. I mean, [02:58:42] such a rise in votes [02:58:45] and voter preference [02:58:48] has not been seen in the establishment of [02:58:51] another political party to this extent. Even the Justice and Development Party, [02:58:54] in the elections of 2003, [02:58:57] November 3, 2002, it came to [02:59:00] power in 2003. [02:59:04] Even then, it barely managed to reach this vote share, didn't [02:59:08] it, professor? Yes, I mean, after separating from the main body, [02:59:11] consider the Democratic Party that separated from the Justice Party, consider the Republican Trust [02:59:15] Party that separated from the Republican People's Party. For any party that separates [02:59:18] from the main body, I completely agree, such a rapid increase in votes [02:59:22] in such a short time is not rare, it's almost unseen. [02:59:26] We need to acknowledge that, [02:59:29] but it was forced to separate, [02:59:32] like an absolute historical event. [02:59:38] If the difference in the Istanbul elections, which was 13,000, increased to 800,000 [02:59:41] in a month, a month and a half, then after such an unfair [02:59:44] and unlawful decision, a party that has become the first party in Turkey's history [02:59:47] emerged stronger as a new party. We can also see this as [02:59:51] voter insight. Şükrü [02:59:54] Küçükşahin, is Erdoğan's candidacy being made an issue on purpose? [02:59:58] What do you say? [03:00:01] First of all, I think there is a coded word here. [03:00:05] That is, the example Mr. Uğur mentioned about the new [03:00:08] party becoming the first party just a week or a few days after [03:00:12] its establishment, I think its source is [03:00:15] its legitimacy. That is, this party was established [03:00:19] as a result of legitimate and legitimate necessities. [03:00:22] All illegitimate initiatives [03:00:26] have gathered the public's reaction for that reason. [03:00:29] The new party became the first party due [03:00:33] to its current situation. [03:00:36] Now, an election will be held [03:00:40] today. No one should [03:00:43] worry about this. The lands of Anatolia [03:00:47] have been very experienced and very conscious about the ballot box [03:00:51] for 150 years. Especially [03:00:54] it will never forgive the slightest [03:00:57] disrespect to its will. It will [03:01:01] punish it excessively. Now, [03:01:05] whether there will be an early election on this date or that date, [03:01:08] whether 360 will be found or not, whether it will be 400 [03:01:12] or not, you know, all these things can happen [03:01:15] hypothetically. Of course, but [03:01:18] I think this will be a coercion and it will not have legitimacy. [03:01:21] If you are talking about an early election, it should be held at least [03:01:25] a year in advance. Otherwise, if you are not going [03:01:29] to hold an early election, then [03:01:32] I think this would be going beyond legitimacy. In what [03:01:36] sense? In terms of getting the will of the people [03:01:39] behind you. Especially in this area, I say. [03:01:43] Now, you will transfer [03:01:46] deputies, and [03:01:49] you will try to suppress the opposition [03:01:53] by using all your power. And [03:01:55] in this way, you will say that this [03:01:58] early election decision is an early election if we do it [03:02:01] a month earlier, or a week earlier. [03:02:05] Believe me, this will have no legitimacy [03:02:08] in the eyes of the people, and it should be known [03:02:12] that Turkey has been experiencing a crisis [03:02:15] for a long time. This is not just an economic crisis, [03:02:19] I'm saying, a crisis of political [03:02:22] trust is also being experienced, a crisis in terms of state [03:02:25] administration is also being experienced. All of these [03:02:28] are happening before the eyes of society. Society [03:02:31] also wants to get out of this crisis. [03:02:34] They have also seen that it is not possible to get out of this crisis [03:02:38] with the system created in the last 10 years. So, the system needs to be changed. [03:02:41] That is, change is needed. That is, doing something [03:02:45] new, saying something new, making [03:02:48] a new proposal is needed. The current government [03:02:51] does not leave a positive impression [03:02:55] regarding any of these issues. On the contrary, as I said [03:02:58] earlier, it feels the need to sideline [03:03:02] the opposition through illegitimate [03:03:05] means. It does this in every area of life. I mean, Ms. Sinem, [03:03:08] what we have seen in Üsküdar in the last few [03:03:11] days, what we have seen in Adana Yüreğir, or the political ban [03:03:15] and prison sentence given to Ekrem İmamoğlu after [03:03:18] he was acquitted twice, we have seen the conditions. I think [03:03:21] all these also increase [03:03:25] this legitimacy discussion I mentioned earlier, [03:03:29] and all these [03:03:32] are happening before the eyes of society. Turkey has been experiencing [03:03:35] inflation [03:03:37] chronically, [03:03:40] excuse me, we are listening to you. Your voice went out and came back. [03:03:43] No, another voice was added in between. [03:03:47] "I apologize. Turkey, look, I always give this example, [03:03:51] there is no other country in the world that has fought inflation for such [03:03:55] a long time. It has become chronic. [03:03:57] Turkey's economic problems have also become chronic. All of these happened [03:04:01] during this government's term. While all these are happening, [03:04:05] if the market has [03:04:07] even stopped being a place where ordinary people [03:04:11] go to shop the most, if the market seller [03:04:15] is closing their stall, [03:04:18] if people can't go there to shop, [03:04:22] if that's also due to high prices, then you [03:04:25] really can't achieve legitimacy with things like transferring [03:04:29] deputies or these types [03:04:31] of operations carried out in municipalities. Can you put a comma [03:04:35] for a moment, dear Şükrü Küçükşahin? Please put a comma now, [03:04:38] because it's important for a unified statement. Oh, is that so? [03:04:42] Then you should still put the comma, because [03:04:46] our masters... There was a meeting. The Minister of Justice held [03:04:49] a meeting at the White House. Its details are related to voting by mail, [03:04:53] but since you will be leaving at the end of this hour, [03:04:56] I would like to get your final evaluation. [03:04:59] So, about the agenda, please, professor. Is that so? [03:05:03] Before connecting, yes, please. I mean, [03:05:06] I agree with what Mr. Şükrü said. A change, etc. [03:05:10] What are we talking about? Why is there a need [03:05:14] to oppose? What dynamic and parameter do we look at? [03:05:17] We are saying there are 14 trillion lira interest payments in the next 3 years. [03:05:20] So, in 2020, [03:05:23] in 2027, approximately 3 trillion 865 [03:05:27] billion, in 2028, 4 trillion 170 [03:05:30] billion, and in 2029, around 4 trillion 300 [03:05:34] 345 billion. When you add them up, there are about 14 million 14 trillion [03:05:38] interest payments. Now, so that the audience doesn't get confused, let me say this: for every 100 lira [03:05:41] in the budget, everyone pays taxes, 19 lira [03:05:45] 19.43 kuruş goes to interest, [03:05:48] only 9.95 kuruş goes to investment. [03:05:51] So, half of the interest goes to investment. [03:05:55] That's why the unemployment rate has reached 31% of society. [03:05:58] That's why there is such impoverishment, as we talked about earlier. [03:06:02] That's why there is a major distortion in income distribution [03:06:06] that cannot be fixed. That's why the middle class has disappeared [03:06:09] and is rapidly moving towards the lower segment. So, [03:06:13] society actually needs change to [03:06:17] help the unemployed with diplomas, [03:06:20] those we call unemployed with no school, no university, [03:06:24] no home. To re-establish the dreams [03:06:27] of all these young people, to re-establish social peace, [03:06:30] for the social consensus, the social consent we call [03:06:33] "rıza," to be realized again, for people to regain [03:06:37] the smiles they have lost, change is, of course, needed. [03:06:40] As long as the parties [03:06:43] that are in favor of change can present [03:06:47] a compact formula that everyone [03:06:51] can understand and can truly [03:06:54] embrace the future with hope. Let me get a final evaluation [03:06:57] from you too, professor. I think the Justice and Development [03:07:01] Party's efforts, especially against [03:07:04] the new party, which can be considered [03:07:07] anti-democratic, will not bring advantage to the party. [03:07:11] I think that initiatives [03:07:14] and phenomena that have not derived their legitimacy from the ballot box [03:07:18] will not be enough to keep a political [03:07:21] party in power. I am evaluating this, [03:07:24] and as an example, I show this: [03:07:27] How was the Justice and Development Party founded? It was founded [03:07:30] by breaking away from the Welfare Party, [03:07:34] from that main body. The Welfare Party, [03:07:37] which was previously led by the late Professor [03:07:40] Necmettin Erbakan, that political view [03:07:43] became the Welfare Party with the closure of various [03:07:46] parties. Then, after Welfare, it became Fazilet. So, yes, [03:07:50] National Salvation, [03:07:52] National Order, National [03:07:55] Salvation, Welfare, Fazilet. [03:07:58] It became Fazilet. If bans [03:08:02] or what we can call anti-democratic initiatives [03:08:05] could prevent a political formation from coming [03:08:09] to power, Mr. Tayyip Erdoğan's Justice and Development [03:08:13] Party could not have come to power in the first election [03:08:16] it entered. Therefore, but [03:08:19] the members of the government should always keep this [03:08:23] fact in mind for their own [03:08:26] political future and power, [03:08:30] and for our democratic [03:08:33] life, it is very important, [03:08:36] very valuable. I also have a request for Halk TV [03:08:40] viewers, I want to address you. As you saw [03:08:43] earlier, Halk TV draws its strength from you, [03:08:46] dear viewers. It has no other [03:08:50] support than you. Halk TV, like the name of this program, [03:08:53] is an uncensored television. Look, in this [03:08:57] studio where we are currently speaking, [03:09:00] there is no prompter in front of any camera. [03:09:03] The faces of Halk TV do not [03:09:06] read a pre-written script by looking at the prompter. [03:09:09] They freely express [03:09:13] their thoughts within the framework [03:09:16] of their personal professional responsibilities. While doing this, [03:09:20] they strictly adhere to universal [03:09:23] professional principles. Therefore, [03:09:26] I ask you to continue to increase your support for Halk TV, [03:09:31] because Turkey desperately needs [03:09:33] Halk TV to continue its existence in order [03:09:37] to breathe a democratic atmosphere. Mr. Dündar, you touched upon [03:09:40] such a beautiful and accurate point that it is also perfectly aligned with today's [03:09:44] topics. That's why I actually call Halk TV viewers "Great Halk TV viewers," [03:09:48] like "Great Fenerbahçe fans." Great Halk TV [03:09:51] viewers. I mean, yes, not a single penny comes [03:09:55] from public institutions and organizations, but they have such [03:09:59] a preference and respect [03:10:02] and love that in all my years in this profession, of course, my career [03:10:06] is nothing compared to yours, but I have never seen such a thing, such [03:10:10] Akdeniz, welcome. I couldn't say welcome to you so as not to interrupt [03:10:14] my professors. Good broadcast to all of us. What did you say, Sena? [03:10:17] Of course not. [03:10:21] We will take Serra every hour. Serra [03:10:24] will soon inform us about the latest developments from the United [03:10:27] States. Thank you very much. We will watch. I dropped my pen. [03:10:31] We will watch on the way. I will write down the developments for you, [03:10:35] and you can open them on the way. Director, if we can leave early and come back early, let's do it. [03:10:39] Is that so? Okay, Mr. Ercüment, let's start with an introduction, but [03:10:42] for one minute. Why has the general headquarters started [03:10:46] making statements about the President's candidacy, one after another? [03:10:49] Statements are coming that there is no legal or constitutional obstacle. [03:10:53] I think the normative situation, [03:10:57] the regular situation, is behind us. They will enter this process as [03:11:00] they wish. I don't think they are legitimate either. [03:11:04] For the opposition, will they say no [03:11:08] to an early election, said Mr. Mitat Hoca? [03:11:11] I mean, they will use that. [03:11:13] This is how they are entering. I think the main [03:11:17] problem is that they will enter the election by magnifying [03:11:21] the opposition's legitimacy issue. Now, as I was going on air, [03:11:24] we were constantly messaging. Today is a disastrous situation. [03:11:27] Yesterday, today, now my journalist [03:11:31] friends are being asked to be arrested because they reported [03:11:35] in Georgia. Yes, we are giving Kaos GL's Instagram. [03:11:38] Mr. Ercüment, you made a very important introduction. Thank you [03:11:42] again very much, Mr. Dündar. See you next Tuesday. [03:11:45] Professor Mitat, thank you very much. See you very soon. [03:11:49] Let's take a short break at 3 o'clock. Let's come back at the top of the hour. [03:11:51] gelelim. [03:12:04] Accessing current news instantly is now very easy. [03:12:07] Open WhatsApp and find the updates tab. In the search [03:12:11] bar, type Halk TV. Find the Halk TV [03:12:14] page from the results and don't [03:12:17] forget the "Follow" option in the top right corner. [03:12:20] Be instantly informed about breaking news. Follow [03:12:24] Halk TV on WhatsApp and get the news instantly [03:12:28] whenever you want. [03:12:41] Yes, we are starting the 4th hour. We are discussing the hot topics [03:12:45] of domestic politics, but we will go to Washington, [03:12:48] because there was a very important meeting at the White House. [03:12:52] The person who held the meeting was the Minister of Justice, because [03:12:55] no one is unaware of Trump's demand, especially [03:12:59] for voting by mail, before the elections [03:13:03] to be held in November. Therefore, [03:13:05] the statement to be made by the Minister of Justice today [03:13:09] and the messages he would give at the press conference were [03:13:12] also important. And with all its splendor, [03:13:15] my dear Serra Karaçam, Halk TV's Washington correspondent, [03:13:18] will inform us about everything that happened there with her smiling face. [03:13:22] Now, should we start with the Minister of Justice holding [03:13:26] a meeting at the White House? Or should we go [03:13:29] to where the voting by mail issue will evolve? [03:13:33] I'll immediately give you the floor, dear Serra. [03:13:35] You can explain. Yes, thank you very much. Today was really [03:13:39] an unusual sight. The Minister of Justice choosing [03:13:43] the White House as the venue for his press conference. The White House press secretary [03:13:47] left his position after having a second child, but actually, the main [03:13:50] reason is said to be that after President [03:13:54] Trump left Ankara, due to security concerns, [03:13:57] he left in a cargo plane instead of a passenger plane, [03:14:00] and he didn't include the press secretary in that team, [03:14:03] even though he knew about such a threat, thus putting him at risk. [03:14:07] This is said to have led him to make this decision. After that, [03:14:11] he left his position, saying he would take care of his child. For this [03:14:14] reason, various government officials [03:14:17] and ministers come to the White House podium and hold press conferences here, as no new name [03:14:21] has been appointed. However, this situation [03:14:24] is unusual for the Minister of Justice because the Minister of Justice [03:14:27] is expected to be more neutral, even if they have an ideological affiliation. [03:14:31] At least symbolically, they don't usually come and speak [03:14:34] at the government's podium. [03:14:37] The FBI can come, other directors can come [03:14:41] and give information, but today, in this sense, [03:14:44] the press conference in the Rose Garden of the White House [03:14:47] was significant, especially since it was announced one day [03:14:51] after the Supreme Court's decision. And it was something never [03:14:55] seen before. It naturally [03:14:58] raised new questions about independence. [03:15:02] We can say that. Let's talk about the Supreme [03:15:05] Court's decision regarding the USPS, which is like America's [03:15:08] post office, and the rule for mail-in [03:15:11] ballots. This postal institution distributes them. [03:15:15] Trump signed an executive order in March [03:15:19] that brought new rules that could delay their distribution. [03:15:21] With this executive order, he thought he could centralize [03:15:25] the authority to distribute ballots, which was previously held by the states, [03:15:28] in the federal government. Objections came from [03:15:32] lower courts. On August 24, [03:15:35] the Supreme Court temporarily granted permission to Trump, [03:15:38] but yesterday, the final decision came, and [03:15:42] it was said that he could not do this because the elections would be at risk. [03:15:46] Let's provide this background information. Of course, the Minister [03:15:49] of Justice today said that the President's goal [03:15:52] is not to prevent people from voting, not to restrict it, [03:15:56] but on the contrary, he supports free and fair elections. He explained [03:16:00] that "we took this step to prevent illegal voting, to prevent [03:16:02] non-citizens from voting, and to prevent [03:16:06] duplicate voting." Therefore, [03:16:09] he gave the message that this decision [03:16:12] will not hinder our efforts, and we will continue [03:16:16] investigations against those who vote again or those who vote as immigrants. [03:16:19] However, at least for now, the post office [03:16:23] will continue to distribute the existing envelopes [03:16:26] and ballots of the states. The restrictive provisions [03:16:30] they wanted will not be implemented. The President's [03:16:33] Minister of Justice also had other messages today, [03:16:36] but if there's anything you want to ask, let me take that first, then [03:16:40] that. [03:16:55] Now, also with those licenses, when I heard it was a decision [03:16:59] related to it, I thought it was worth asking. Yes, actually, [03:17:02] there might be a small misunderstanding there, I wanted to contribute to your broadcast [03:17:06] with what kind of regulations RTÜK makes here [03:17:09] regarding the issue. The Minister of Justice. "No important questions [03:17:13] were asked about licenses today at this meeting, but [03:17:16] let me tell you right away, there is a commission here called [03:17:20] FCC, like RTÜK, and as a regulatory body, this [03:17:23] commission normally does not take into account the opinions [03:17:27] of the officials there, editorial viewpoints, but other [03:17:31] requirements such as content for children and families, [03:17:34] and to guarantee true [03:17:37] independence, all [03:17:41] candidates must speak for an equal" amount of time, [03:17:44] and if a candidate emerged from one state, their opponent should also speak for the same [03:17:48] amount of minutes, to maintain balance, [03:17:52] the FCC is actually an institution that performs these inspections. However, [03:17:56] during this period, they had serious lawsuits [03:17:59] with broadcasters, because instead of protecting [03:18:02] the freedom of expression article of the constitution, [03:18:05] they took steps to punish through license renewal, [03:18:09] waving a stick. Especially for ABC and 8 [03:18:13] channels, licenses are normally [03:18:16] renewed every 8 years, but they started early [03:18:19] reviews before their time, and [03:18:22] in a way, they made them self-censor [03:18:25] with this license stick. That is, instead of [03:18:28] directly banning speech, they put pressure on intermediaries, [03:18:32] channels, and consequently, on the other hand, [03:18:35] advertisers to the channels, banks, [03:18:38] and payment systems, and indirectly [03:18:41] shape them. My goodness, how far removed these things are from us, [03:18:45] I mean, you're explaining it now, I can't believe it. [03:18:49] I mean, there's no such thing as RTÜK and all that. [03:18:53] I mean, they say it's an advanced democracy. [03:19:02] As far as I understand, things are still coming back from the judiciary, let's add that. Of course, [03:19:05] when did this discussion first emerge? We've been talking about the Iran war for months, [03:19:09] you know, the Iran war is the number one topic even in prime [03:19:13] time slots. For a long time, the administration [03:19:16] has been unsuccessful regarding this Iran war, [03:19:19] they made mistakes, and they started labeling some news [03:19:23] as fake news. [03:19:26] He told [03:19:33] a reporter, "You shouldn't have a license, how can you ask if [03:19:37] Iran won?" And again, there was an important [03:19:40] programmer named Jimmy Kimmel on ABC, and [03:19:44] he did an interview with a senator recently, but due to pressure [03:19:47] on the grounds that the other person was not given enough time, [03:19:50] they had to put the interview on YouTube. The channel [03:19:54] could not broadcast it. So, they act as if they are supporting [03:19:56] diversity, they say "we are doing it for this reason", [03:20:00] but it always works for one side, it always works when there's a Democratic interview, [03:20:04] because the system was not with the other side. Therefore, lawsuits are currently [03:20:07] ongoing in court. [03:20:10] Broadcasters, especially [03:20:13] television, are given fewer rights than the written press. [03:20:17] That is, while the written press has a jurisprudence that ensures [03:20:20] the protection of freedom of expression, broadcasters, [03:20:24] television broadcasters, do not have this. It is being reviewed again. Of course, journalists [03:20:27] are also no longer satisfied, because for example, the owner of the Washington Post, [03:20:31] Jeff Bezos, is known to be close to the administration, [03:20:34] because he is a businessman. They also resigned from the Washington Post [03:20:37] and moved to Washington San. We talked about that [03:20:41] in recent days. So, this is the press part. [03:20:44] Our viewers who make comparisons in the first part, [03:20:47] with the comments of dear Uğur Dündar, can now combine it with [03:20:50] their own thoughts [03:20:53] and compare what I've explained. that they would follow us, because [03:20:56] they were curious about what you would say, dear Serra. [03:20:59] Yes, now let me give you a few [03:21:02] short headlines from the Minister of Justice, and then I'll leave the floor to you. [03:21:06] You know, there was a news report yesterday that a Russian businessman, [03:21:10] allegedly close to Putin, contributed hundreds of thousands [03:21:14] of dollars as an organization gift to President Trump's son's wedding ceremony. [03:21:18] This was also asked to the Minister of Justice, and a brave journalist [03:21:21] said, "Investigate these allegations. [03:21:25] Is there any impropriety here?" A businessman who is said to be close [03:21:29] to a foreign head of state, while in office, you know the wedding was recent. [03:21:33] Trump couldn't even go to the wedding, let's remember that. To this question, [03:21:36] he replied that it is difficult to investigate [03:21:39] the wedding gift, and said, "We don't have enough [03:21:43] information. It's an allegation that he's Putin's friend, there's no [03:21:47] evidence to show that." So he refrained [03:21:50] from giving details, but journalists are not afraid to ask questions. [03:21:54] This is an important observation, I think. Another [03:21:57] issue, you know, there are very strict policies [03:22:00] regarding immigration. So much so that [03:22:03] an investigation was launched against Ilhan Omar, a member of the House of Representatives. [03:22:07] There were rumors going on for months, years, that she married her brother [03:22:10] to give him legal status. This was asked to the Minister of Justice, [03:22:13] and he said he did not want to comment on an ongoing investigation. [03:22:17] He said, "Are you taking a step in this regard [03:22:20] regarding the ideologicalization of institutions, [03:22:24] every time you seize something? in the form of a certain ideology," [03:22:27] and he commented, "The ideology of any federal [03:22:30] employee, whether Republican or Democrat, is not a good thing. [03:22:33] We are doing our best to prevent this." Let me add this right away: [03:22:37] there is serious judicial cooperation between Turkey and the United States, [03:22:40] especially the FBI. Two important names [03:22:43] from Turkey that America was looking for were extradited. [03:22:47] One was a terrorist, and the other was involved [03:22:51] in healthcare fraud using public funds. [03:23:07] and extradited. But while these names [03:23:11] who fled from America are coming, there are also names [03:23:14] that Turkey wants. For example, Umut Altaş, his extradition case is still [03:23:17] ongoing. He is an important witness in the Gülistan Doku [03:23:20] murder case, and on the other hand, perhaps also a suspect. [03:23:23] And he has important information [03:23:26] about the governor's son. This cooperation always works [03:23:29] for one side, for America's benefit. [03:23:33] We see that it is not progressing. Another important case is Venezuela. [03:23:46] He was caught while his owner was being sought in a certain place. [03:23:49] Even though he admitted his crime, he was not allowed to leave. While other [03:23:52] names were leaving and waiting, [03:23:55] his process will also be clear. There are such issues. Also, [03:23:58] finally, another Turkish citizen arrested in Panama, [03:24:02] Mustafa Mollaoğlu, was arrested in Panama in an American operation [03:24:06] for violating Iran sanctions. But there is a confidentiality [03:24:09] order, so how consistent or inconsistent this cooperation is, [03:24:13] these are also important test points. Thank you very much, dear Serra [03:24:16] Karaçam, you summarized the agenda of the United States [03:24:20] in one breath, in one go. [03:24:23] Good luck, good broadcasts. Thank you, Ercüment Akdeniz. Before we go to the break, [03:24:26] you had actually started to explain how what happened in the country [03:24:30] in the last 24 hours would shed light on the upcoming period. Please, [03:24:34] if you remember where you left off, continue from there. [03:24:37] "Yes, you are discussing whether there will be an early election. [03:24:41] Now, when we look at that medium-term program, [03:24:44] we see signs that the election has been brought forward. [03:24:48] This has been talked about, discussed, but we also need to look [03:24:51] at the operations. That is, operations against municipalities, [03:24:54] operations against the main opposition were already [03:24:56] systematized, [03:25:00] but this situation has now reached an interesting dimension [03:25:03] in the last few days. We, as the news center at İlke [03:25:06] TV, I am sure it's hard to follow on Halk TV. [03:25:09] I mean, Mr. Şükrü is very knowledgeable. Now I'm taking notes, [03:25:13] I can't keep up. Our friend Tuğba Tekelek, [03:25:16] the journalist, can be arrested at any moment. [03:25:19] Her statement is being taken. This was taken within the scope [03:25:23] of LGBT operations, but for making a news report, our journalist friends. [03:25:26] Canhan Coşkun and Kazım Kızıl are journalists. [03:25:29] They are currently facing a [03:25:33] 14-year prison sentence in connection [03:25:36] with the Rabia Naz case. An investigation has been launched. [03:25:39] We already know Selahattin Günday, he was arrested for the second [03:25:42] time, arrested for the second time. Now today, for example, Şebnem Korur [03:25:45] Fincancı, Erol Önder, former representative of RSF, [03:25:48] Turkey representative Ali Nesin and similar names were brought [03:25:52] before the court again in the Özgür Gündem case, which was actually a closed [03:25:55] case. And now, the decision was made to continue [03:25:58] Nadiye Gürbüz's detention. [03:26:02] While all this is happening, one should probably think, [03:26:05] I mean, while the press freedom area is narrowing [03:26:09] so much, how will the opposition go to the elections? There is no voice, [03:26:13] no right to receive news. Therefore, I also received an access [03:26:16] block as a journalist, right? Of course, let me tell you that too, Ertunç Bey, [03:26:20] Evrensel newspaper, that is, the daily Evrensel newspaper has 1 million [03:26:24] followers, and an access block was imposed on it. [03:26:27] And it does labor journalism, I mean, we are talking about the increase in diesel [03:26:31] prices, we are talking about the troubles of the workers. [03:26:34] Now, how will unions, workers, make their voices heard? [03:26:38] You come to the Ali İsmail Korkmaz Foundation. Ali İsmail [03:26:41] Korkmaz was lynched and killed in a very cruel and brutal [03:26:44] way in the middle of the street in Eskişehir. [03:26:47] His mother Emel, along with his family, [03:26:51] his brother, lawyer Gürkan Korkmaz, established a foundation [03:26:54] that gives scholarships to children, provides education, there is nothing [03:26:58] else. How do you block access to this, why do you block access [03:27:01] to this account? To Peace Academics, [03:27:04] I mean, they say there's a process, steps will be taken and so on. [03:27:08] But you say Peace, and access to the accounts of Peace Academics [03:27:11] has been blocked, to Amnesty International. [03:27:15] The list goes on. Now, with things being like this, [03:27:19] what kind of dark tunnel are we entering, and in this dark tunnel, [03:27:22] will there really be a possibility of going to a normal [03:27:25] election, even at a minimum level? Will there be an equal [03:27:29] competition between parties? When I look [03:27:33] from here, there is also an operation [03:27:36] against socialists today. 39 people [03:27:39] were detained, probably there are arrests, I can't follow it now. For example, [03:27:43] one of them is Mert Titiz, the chairman of the Socialist [03:27:46] Refoundation Party. He was taken into custody, [03:27:49] included in this investigation. These are also component [03:27:53] parties of the HDP. Moreover, there were concerns [03:27:56] about the process, about trust in the process, [03:27:59] and it grew. You say constitution, [03:28:02] new constitution, right? We'll bring it on October 1st, discuss it, a civil and democratic [03:28:06] constitution. What will you do with social consensus? You arrest journalists, [03:28:10] you arrest them, you judge people because of their gender, [03:28:12] you criminalize them, you make operations [03:28:16] against municipalities every day, you turn the name of the opposition [03:28:20] party into a problem. I also don't take [03:28:24] that lightly. Let's see what comes out of that. [03:28:27] Including the issue of eligibility [03:28:30] for elections. Also, Fatih Yıldız had an interesting [03:28:34] post, yes, Fatih Bey posted it today. I don't know if you discussed it, [03:28:37] but please, or in a way, [03:28:40] let's introduce a new threshold system for parties. [03:28:44] But the changes in the election law and the election system did not come [03:28:47] from the MHP for the first time today, such statements [03:28:50] have been made before. Today, Fatih Bey elaborated on it a bit more. [03:28:54] Mr. Şükrü, as I understand it, Ercüment Akdeniz's concern and question is that, as a journalist, [03:28:58] he cannot foresee a normal election climate. [03:29:01] He says, "How will it be?" I apologize, before I move on, [03:29:05] let me just conclude with one sentence. I'm also curious about Mr. Şükrü's [03:29:09] thoughts, we are colleagues after all. [03:29:11] So, parties, [03:29:14] the opposition as a whole, [03:29:18] everyone has many troubles. But can't they come together and hold a very powerful [03:29:22] rally, a very powerful resistance against press freedom, [03:29:26] against censorship? I mean, if journalists [03:29:29] cannot be supported today, when will they be supported? [03:29:32] This siege, how will it be broken? This also [03:29:35] needs to happen. Not just one party, [03:29:39] all opposition, all unions, all civil society, all institutions together, [03:29:43] can't they do something like this? The area of press freedom is really [03:29:46] suffocating. Please, Mr. Şükrü? [03:29:50] It's impossible not to agree with Ercüment Bey. [03:29:53] Really, we constantly expect [03:29:57] access blocks, detentions, [03:30:00] tutuklama rahatlıkla bekliyoruz e sosyal medya [03:30:03] paylaşımları sürekli olarak eee yasaklanıyor ve [03:30:07] yenilerini kurmak zorunda kalıyorlar eee [03:30:10] ben 45 yıldır bu mesleğin içindeyim inanın [03:30:14] biz geçmişte olanları beğenmezdik [03:30:16] eleştirirdik yani o günler özgürlük günleri. miş [03:30:20] gazeteciler için maalesef onu der hale [03:30:23] geldik, mesela söyleyip duruyoruz, kimse bunu [03:30:27] basite indirgemesin, deminden beri söylüyorum, gazeteciler [03:30:31] halkın haber alma özgürlüğünü, halka [03:30:33] haber ulaştırma eee gücünü kullanıyorlar, [03:30:37] yani aynen mahkemeler nasıl hakimler, yargıçlar halk adına [03:30:40] karar veriyorsa, gazeteciler de halk [03:30:44] adına izliyor, gözlüyor ve onu halka ulaştırıyor, şimdi [03:30:48] mesela dünyanın... en büyük [03:30:50] eee mahkemesini yapmakla övünen [03:30:53] adında da adalet olan bir partinin [03:30:56] iktidarında gazeteciler [03:30:59] salonun bir köşesine sığıntı gibi [03:31:02] oturtuluyor, halbuki gazeteci yargı [03:31:06] insanlarını da, sanıkları e savunma insanlarını [03:31:10] da görebilecek pozisyonda olmalıdır, [03:31:13] çünkü onlar arasındaki, yine basit bir örnek olarak [03:31:16] söylüyorum, en küçük el, kol hareketi mimikler bile haber [03:31:20] değeri taşır ve bunları halkın bilmesi gerekir, yani bir [03:31:23] yargıcın, bir savcının, bir savunma avukatının, bir [03:31:26] sanığın, herhangi bir bu şekilde hareketini [03:31:30] görüp halka aktarması gerekiyor, ama yok, eee, yine birinci [03:31:33] bölümde, daha doğrusu bu [03:31:36] medyaya yönelik eee reklam [03:31:38] ambargolarıyla ilgili konuşurken eee ifade ettim [03:31:42] eee medyanın etik ilkeleri yok edildi, haber [03:31:46] alma ve haberi yayma özgürlüğü ortadan kaldırıldı bak. [03:31:50] bakın gazeteciler yani basit bir suçlama haline geldi bu [03:31:53] işte ne yalan haberi [03:31:57] yaymak gerçek olmayan haber neydi klasik de lafı var [03:32:00] gerçekten bilgi yanıltıcı bilgi yanıltıcı bilgi yaymak yanıltıcı [03:32:03] bilgiyi alene yaç bey ezberlemek istemiyorum [03:32:07] çünkü sanki kanıksamış gibi olacağız kanıksamamalıyız yani [03:32:11] bu kadar kolay olmamalı ama bu dezenformasyon yasası [03:32:14] çıkarıldı bakın bunun gazetecilerle alakalı olmadığı söylendi [03:32:18] ama dezenformasyon yasası. eee gerekçe gösterilerek [03:32:22] arkadaşlarımız tutuklanıyor, gözaltına alınıyor, aylarca, yıllarca [03:32:25] cezaevinde kalıyor, eee işte nezaret haninde [03:32:28] kalıyorlar, eee bence bu bir sadece [03:32:32] muhalefet sorunu değil, iktidar sorunu, yani iktidarda [03:32:36] eee medya özgürlüğü konusunda titiz olmalı, biz [03:32:39] sadece muhalefet niye sahip çıkmıyor noktasında [03:32:43] eleştiride haklı olabiliriz ama bizim asıl ey [03:32:46] iktidar güç sende eğer... [03:32:50] "bu ülkede halkın haber alma özgürlüğüne inanıyorsanız, [03:32:53] o zaman medyayı özgür kılmanız lazım, gazetecileri özgür [03:32:57] kılmanız lazım, gazete patronlarını, medya [03:33:00] patronlarını değil, özellikle de gazetecileri özgür [03:33:04] kılmalısınız, eee maalesef AK [03:33:07] Parti iktidara geldiğinden bu yana [03:33:10] bu konuda bizi sevindirecek, mutlu edecek hiçbir [03:33:14] adım atmadı, eee aksine [03:33:17] bugün hayatın her alanında olduğu gibi" medya alanında da [03:33:21] aşırı güç kullanıyor ve eee [03:33:24] medyayı eee şu ya da bu şekilde baskılama yolunu [03:33:28] seçiyor eee o nedenle çok [03:33:31] gür bir ses. çıkmalı ve bu bütün [03:33:35] partiler tarafından eee yine eee bu [03:33:39] ses çıkarılmalı ve de iktidara yakın olduğunu söyleyen [03:33:42] medya aslında bir etik ilkeler [03:33:45] eee ilkeleri yeniden anımsamalı bence [03:33:49] asıl sorun orada geçmişte yine farklı [03:33:52] ideolojilere sahip medya kuruluşları vardı sinem [03:33:55] hanım ama gazetecilik ilkeleri söz konusu [03:33:58] olduğunda eee gazetecilik etiği söz konusu [03:34:02] olduğun da genel olarak bunların üzerinde [03:34:05] uzlaştığı çok geniş bir alan vardı ve bir araya [03:34:08] gelebiliyorlardı, ama bugün öyle değil, bambaşka bir [03:34:12] dünyadayız, yani Sinema hanım, bunu basit bir örnek olarak [03:34:15] kimse görmesin, ya gazeteciyim diyen insanlar [03:34:18] çıkıyorlar, şu cezaevine atılmalı, bu sürünmeli, bu [03:34:22] çürümeli, işte bu hapse atılmalı, [03:34:26] korkunç bir tablo bu, ama bu gücü nereden alıyor, [03:34:29] iktidardan alıyor, aynı şeyi muhalif bir bilinen bir [03:34:33] gazeteci söylediğinde hemen soruşturmaya uğruyor, [03:34:36] ama bunu iktidara yakın birisi söylediğinde bırakın [03:34:39] soruşturmayı, alkış görüyor, eee bu [03:34:42] tablonun eee Ercüment Hoca mutlaka değişmesi [03:34:46] lazım ve bunu Türkiye değiştirmek zorunda, [03:34:49] eee sürekli söylediğim gibi iktidara daha çok [03:34:52] görev düşüyor, iktidar demokratik olgunluğunu kaybettiği [03:34:56] sürece medya üzerindeki baskısını da arttırıyor, [03:34:59] bugün ben çok inanıyorum yani... hep diyorlar ya [03:35:03] örneğin Sayın Cumhurbaşkanı siyaseti iyi okur, ben artık sayın [03:35:06] Cumhurbaşkanı siyaseti iyi okuduğunu düşünmüyorum, çünkü [03:35:10] siyaseti eğer iyi okursa Üsküdar'ın [03:35:13] olmaması lazım, medya üzerindeki bu kadar baskının olmaması lazım, çünkü [03:35:17] bunlar iktidarın meşruiyetini yitirmesine neden [03:35:20] oluyor, bunlar iktidarın, ak parti'nin diyeyim, [03:35:23] daha somut konuşayım eee halk [03:35:27] nezdindeki güveni erozyyona uğratıyor ve [03:35:31] bugün... eee bu baskılamalar [03:35:35] kendi eee seçmen tabanı tarafından da görülüyor, içine [03:35:38] sindiremiyorlar eee şeyde [03:35:42] olanı, Üsküdar'da olanı, yani bizim gücümüz bu [03:35:45] muydu? eee yani bakın bugün [03:35:48] bugün sohbet ediyorum ya sinem hanım bir karşımdaki [03:35:51] insan ne dedi biliyor musun aman beşükrü bey dedi artık [03:35:55] belediye seçimi kazanmak çok kolay nasıl yani dedim [03:35:58] ne olacak dört tane transfer 3 tane gözaltı iki [03:36:02] tane tutuklama meclis üyelerini belediyeyi kazandı, şimdi [03:36:05] bakın, bu konuşuluyorsa Türkiye'de, bu [03:36:09] konuşuluyorsa, gerçekten iktidar [03:36:12] seçmen nezdinde güvenini yitirmiştir, bu [03:36:16] da aşırı güç kullanmaktan kaynaklı, bugün [03:36:19] iktidarın bildiği tek bir şey var, yani o anlamda söylüyorum, güç [03:36:23] kullanırım, aşırı güç kullanırım, aşırı güç [03:36:25] kullanarak eee istediğim sonucu alırım, iktidarımı korurum, [03:36:29] hayır hayır, yani seçmen bunu gör. seçmen [03:36:33] görüyor, [03:36:40] I mean, the inability of the economy to improve, [03:36:44] the fact that the price of a liter of diesel has now [03:36:47] reached triple digits, [03:36:49] I mean, the economy wants predictability, [03:36:53] the economy wants legal regulations [03:36:56] to be implemented, I mean, economies can recover [03:36:59] in climates where the judiciary is not politicized. [03:37:03] Now, there's a war right next to us, that's true. [03:37:06] There was also one between Russia and Ukraine, and there is one between the US [03:37:10] and Iran, but how correct is it to evaluate this current situation [03:37:13] solely with geopolitical risks and developments [03:37:17] around us? Now, we say the real agenda [03:37:20] of the citizen, of course, we know the economy, [03:37:24] we are aware. The price of diesel hitting the 100 lira [03:37:27] mark today, please I ask my director Murat Erdoğan [03:37:31] to put the visuals on the screen. [03:37:34] How far it has come. In 2021, [03:37:38] the price of a liter of diesel, which reached [03:37:41] two-digit figures, is just about to reach three digits 5 years later. [03:37:45] That is, as of yesterday, after the confirmed [03:37:48] increase of 6.62, it exceeded 90 liras in Istanbul, [03:37:51] and reached 95 liras in Batman and other places. Look, what was it, [03:37:55] what happened? At the end of 2021, [03:37:58] the price of a liter of diesel was 11. [03:38:01] At the end of 2022, it was 22.10. [03:38:05] At the end of 2023, it was 36.40. [03:38:07] At the end of 2024, it was 43.20. [03:38:11] In 2025, that is, last December, [03:38:15] the price of a liter of diesel, which was 65 liras, [03:38:17] is now 96 liras. [03:38:21] In 5 years, the increase in diesel [03:38:24] is 841%. [03:38:27] Since the beginning of the year, the increase is 50%. [03:38:31] There's a classic saying, "I always buy 50 liras worth, [03:38:35] let the price go up as much as it wants." Now, with our largest banknote, [03:38:38] that is, 200 liras, you can buy 2 liters [03:38:41] of gasoline. Ertunç Bey. [03:38:45] You give 200 liras, your largest banknote, and he gives you 2 liters [03:38:48] of gasoline, or diesel. I mean, when we look [03:38:51] at countries at war, you might say that Iran [03:38:55] is already a rich country in terms of maintenance. [03:38:59] But in Syria, it's between 49 and 70 liras, [03:39:02] where there were also protests. Is the increase in fuel [03:39:05] prices only for fuel, Ertunç Bey? I mean, we are not [03:39:08] an unconscious society to not know that this has a huge impact [03:39:12] on the pricing and re-evaluation [03:39:15] of everything, from needles to threads. [03:39:18] Let's not even talk about needles to threads, [03:39:21] to put it simply, I don't want to digress, [03:39:25] but we go to trials in Silivri, right? Going to a trial in Silivri [03:39:28] and coming back costs 2,500 liras. [03:39:32] Imagine, for a lawyer, a defendant, [03:39:35] we are talking about a fair trial. You will go and represent yourself [03:39:39] at the trial, you will give your statement [03:39:42] there or ask questions to other defendants. [03:39:45] You go 4 days a week, so you need to spend [03:39:49] 10,000, 12,000 liras a week to attend a trial. [03:39:53] This is really not an acceptable situation. And besides, the situation is clear, [03:39:56] we haven't even reached the end of 2026. There is an increase of nearly 50% every year. [03:40:00] But we, as retirees, in salary, [03:40:02] in minimum wage, we don't see an increase of close to 50% in other [03:40:06] earnings, we saw the same in rents, well, now today an operation was carried out against [03:40:09] fruit and vegetable vendors, wasn't it? Based on complaints, an operation was launched [03:40:13] regarding exorbitant fruit and vegetable prices, and [03:40:17] whoever is guilty, whoever is at fault, can of course be prosecuted, and in the end, [03:40:20] whatever the penalty, they can serve it, but now is it only the [03:40:24] fruit and vegetable vendor at the market who is guilty, [03:40:27] or is it the producer trying to produce with this diesel [03:40:30] and these fertilizer prices, and despite [03:40:33] all this, somehow making a profit of 3 or 5 lira, [03:40:36] is the producer guilty? How will they [03:40:39] do it, how will they produce with these prices? Look, diesel [03:40:43] is indispensable for farmers and tradesmen. It is indispensable for transportation. A 10 [03:40:46] lira increase here will perhaps come to our table here in [03:40:50] Istanbul as 300 lira, perhaps it will come as 100 lira [03:40:53] in other jobs in our workplaces, [03:40:56] in our other indirect expenses. What did they use to say? [03:41:00] "I always buy for 50 lira." Now with 50 lira, you can't even smell [03:41:04] diesel, and even if 50 lira's equivalent in today's inflation is 500 [03:41:07] lira, you're still ashamed to buy 500 lira of gas for your car. [03:41:11] When I pass by a gas station, I say "hurry up". I'm ashamed to say "100 lira" [03:41:15] because it finishes filling up in a second. [03:41:18] We are talking about such an economy. What are we talking about as [03:41:22] lawyers? Legal predictability. If you [03:41:25] don't ensure legal predictability, if one [03:41:28] day you take someone from their home in the morning with a newspaper headline, one day [03:41:32] to chicken farmers, one day to vegetable vendors, one day [03:41:35] you conduct operations on oil companies and appoint trustees, [03:41:38] that is, if people in a state of law, under [03:41:41] the protection of law, don't feel safe. If we are in a situation [03:41:45] where the law changes not as it operates but with daily [03:41:48] practices, then these can be 500 lira, or 600 lira, we cannot [03:41:52] stop this this way. What are we talking about? Strict monetary policy, right? [03:41:55] This is the platform where Mehmet Şimşek announced [03:41:59] increased taxes and more burden on the public, but [03:42:02] while these continue, [03:42:06] illegal trials continue, injustice continues. [03:42:09] We say arrest is the last resort, appointment of a trustee is the last [03:42:13] resort. You need to present concrete evidence, you need to find [03:42:17] it to say that there is indeed a criminal element in this company, that assets are being laundered or [03:42:21] that this company was established with it, so that you can appoint a trustee. [03:42:24] But you make trustee decisions without even taking statements, you seize [03:42:28] companies, you open cases against people, "Oh, let's take it to investigation, [03:42:32] let's move to prosecution." "Sorry, we kept you in custody for 4-5 days, [03:42:36] and accidentally arrested you for a month or two in between, sorry, you are acquitted," you say. [03:42:39] In a situation where you cannot foresee, [03:42:42] you can neither invest your money anywhere, [03:42:46] nor is there a situation where you can get the return on your invested [03:42:48] money. In this regard, when we talk about how [03:42:51] social consensus will be formed, how [03:42:54] this economy will change and we will go to the elections, I think that has been abandoned now, [03:42:58] because Mr. Şükrü just mentioned the Üsküdar election, [03:43:02] I mean, which AK Party member, which Nationalist Movement Party member [03:43:06] would say, "Oh, that's good, we won this, how nicely [03:43:10] we won, the national will has found its response"? No one [03:43:13] with an average intelligence level who [03:43:17] can comprehend and interpret those events would say this. Now, since the situation [03:43:20] böyleyken böyle ya yani şimdi tablo böyleyken [03:43:24] küçükşahin ardından da Ercüment Bey'e geleceğim yine çünkü biraz önce sizin [03:43:27] sözünüz yarım kalmıştı ya şimdi bu saatten sonra gıda [03:43:31] fiyatlarının düşeceğine alım gücünün yükselmek [03:43:35] demeyeyim normalleşebileceğine [03:43:37] dair inancı olan bir yurttaşımız var mı bakın dinleyelim bir yurttaş bugün ne diyor [03:43:41] bir sesi verelim. [03:43:45] zam geldi arkadaş bugün yine doldurduk depomuzu 4 liraya Allah izin [03:43:48] verirse bu ne olacak böyle her şeye zam her şeye zam ya bunun [03:43:52] artık biz çaresini bulsunlar ya markete gidemiyoruz alışverişe [03:43:56] gidemiyoruz mazota. mazot demek her şeye zam [03:43:59] demek ya bıktık artık yeter ya yeter farkında [03:44:02] markete gidemiyorum çarşıya gidemiyorum mazota zam demek her şeye zam [03:44:06] demek yani bunun bir şimdi sizce bir yurttaş bu saatten [03:44:10] sonra alım gücünün yükseleceğine ya efendime [03:44:13] söyleyeyim işte gıda fiyatları en basit örneği düşeceğine dair bir [03:44:16] inancınız sizin var mı? hayır [03:44:20] kimsenin yok yani nasıl olsun ki bakın bugün [03:44:23] ben e gelirken işte eşim söyledi yazdı girdim. [03:44:27] aldım inanın sıradan bir market öyle lüks falan değil samimi [03:44:31] söylüyorum ya 1 kilo [03:44:33] kıyma 600 gram da sote [03:44:37] et 2044 [03:44:39] lira ya 2.044 lira [03:44:43] kıyma ve sote et 600 gram sote et 1 [03:44:46] kilo da kıyma e pazara gidiyorsunuz demin [03:44:49] söyledim ee korkunç bir tabloyla karşı [03:44:52] karşıyasınız ve asgari ücretin ne olduğu alım gücünün ne olduğu [03:44:55] ortada iktidar bakın. [03:44:58] asıl bunlarla eee ilgilenmesi gerekirken [03:45:02] eee bu hedefini de eee bu hedefi konusunda da bizi ikna [03:45:05] etmiyor, onun için ısrarla söylüyorum, dünyanın hiçbir [03:45:08] ülkesinde kronikleşmiş bir enflasyonla mücadele, bakın [03:45:12] enflasyon değil, enflasyonla mücadele politikası [03:45:15] yoktur, bu taş çaddası iki yılda olur biter, [03:45:19] ama Türkiye neredeyse 10 yıldır enflasyonla mücadele [03:45:23] ediyor, çünkü sistem yanlış, bakın [03:45:26] verin. etkiyi görün etkiyi dendi, o zaman enflasyon [03:45:29] %15'ti, hatta yüksek [03:45:32] sayılıyordu, e döviz kurları 4 lira [03:45:35] civarındaydı, faiz %9 düzeyindeydi, bugün [03:45:39] demin hoca gitti, yani her 100 lira verginin [03:45:42] e 20 lirası faize gidiyor, [03:45:45] enflasyon dünya şampiyonusunuz, hele gıda enflasyonu [03:45:48] yani Türkiye nasıl bir gıda enflasyonunda şampiyon [03:45:52] olur, anlamak mümkün değil. Ağustos ayında [03:45:56] Sinem Hanım. "ağustos ayında enflasyon sıfır [03:45:59] düzeylerinde çıkardı Türkiye'de her zaman, çünkü sebze ve meyvenin en [03:46:03] bol olda öyle çıkıyor eee şey e [03:46:06] Şükrü bey nasıl şimdi haziranda haziran enflasyonu sıfır [03:46:10] çıkıyor ki Temmuzda şeyler oluyor ya o tabii o ücret [03:46:13] politikası nedeniyle ama eee enflasyon %2 civarında [03:46:17] 2'ye yaklaşıyor bu çok yüksek bir oran yani [03:46:20] niye e çünkü doğru politikalar izlemiyorsunuz [03:46:24] işte Ertunç bey söyledi yani "daha [03:46:27] önce stokçu operasyonu yapıyordun, yok benzinci operasyonu, şimdi [03:46:31] de işte yok tarladan buraya kadar [03:46:34] gelişte eee şöyle fiyat oluyor, böyle oluşuyor, nasıl [03:46:37] oluşuyor, niye bugün oluştu, ya da bugün mü [03:46:41] oluştu, birden bire mi oluştu, sen ülkeyi yönetiyorsun, [03:46:44] ekonomik bir tablo bu, ekonomik kararlar [03:46:47] gerektirir, bu polisiye tedbirlerle önlenemez, gerçekten [03:46:51] önlenemez, sinema hanım, yani burada bir aksaklık var demek [03:46:55] ki senin bunu önlemen gerekiyor." [03:46:59] varlık nedeni bu, hükümet [03:47:01] olman, yani tarladan vatandaşa ulaşan [03:47:05] üründe gerçekten sağlıklı bir fiyat politikasının [03:47:08] oluşmasını sağlaman gerekir, bu polisye tedbirlerle olmaz, aldığın [03:47:11] ekonomik kararlarla olur, aldığın eee işte ne [03:47:15] der mevzuat çerçevesinde olur, ama [03:47:18] böyle bir niyet yok, ben artık buna samimi olarak, yani iktidarın [03:47:22] ekonomiyi öncelemek ya ekonomiyi toparlamak gibi bir önce, bu bir [03:47:25] tercih yani bu bir tercih. mi diyorsunuz artık bu bir eee [03:47:29] ekonomi politikas düşünüyorum bakın ak Parti [03:47:33] sinem hanım ak parti mağdurdan garip gurabadan [03:47:37] uzaklaştı şimdi başka grupların [03:47:40] temsilcisi oldu nedenle bu ülkede [03:47:43] eee milli gelirden çalışanların [03:47:47] yoksulların aldığı pay son 10 yılda [03:47:50] neredeyse 10 puan varlıklıların deyiğine eee [03:47:53] değişmiştir [03:47:56] bakın. gerçekten iddialı bir laf ediyorum, yani [03:47:59] Türkiye'de yoksulların geliri AK Parti [03:48:02] iktidarında azalmıştır, nasıl bir ak Parti garip guraba [03:48:06] demiş, yoksulluğu yok edeceğim diye iktidar olmuş bir parti [03:48:10] ama ben artık bunun ee hele enflasyon politikasının [03:48:14] eee bir yanıyla ya böyle olunca vergi gelirlerimiz daha [03:48:18] yüksek oluyor, o zaman eee yani devletin [03:48:21] tasarruf etmesine gerek yok, devlet daha güçlü harcama yapabilir [03:48:24] işte eee o zaman bizim. de harcama [03:48:28] gücümüz artar diye baktıklarını düşünüyorum yani ekonomist [03:48:31] değilim ama tekrar söylüyorum basit biz de biraz [03:48:34] ekonomi okuru olduk ya da üniversitede bunun eğitimini de aldık [03:48:38] az çok olmaz yani bu kadar uzun süreli enflasyonla [03:48:41] mücadele olmaz sinem hanım olmaz ve [03:48:45] başarıya bakın ya %32 [03:48:47] %32 Arjantin %250'den 2 yılda [03:48:51] %30'a düşürdü sanıyorum ya o zaman enflasyonla [03:48:54] mücadele özür dilerim araya giriyorum ama bu kadar uzun süre mücadele. edilmez [03:48:58] diyorsunuz ya, enflasyonla mücadelenin bu kadar uzun [03:49:01] sürmesi tamamen iktidarın bir kendi tercihi ve politikası mı, [03:49:04] ikinde bulunduğumuz siyasi iklimin bir getirisi mi [03:49:08] bu, mecburi bir getirisi mi eee olan [03:49:11] biten? bakın, eğer enflasyonu düşürme [03:49:15] niyetiniz varsa Türkiye'nin hukuk [03:49:18] devletinde üst sıralara çıkmasını sağlarsın, [03:49:21] demokratik olgunluğu gösterirsin, muhalefet [03:49:24] ve medya üzerindeki baskıları sıfırlarsın, senin hakkın [03:49:28] kadar muhalefete de özgürlük alanı tanırsın, bunları [03:49:32] yapmazsan enflasyonu önleyemezsin, polisiye [03:49:36] tedbirlerle olmaz, sinem hanım, çünkü siz diktatörlükle. [03:49:40] bir ülke değilsiniz, yani o ülkeler bile [03:49:43] ekonomik kararları alırken bambaşka hesapları [03:49:47] yapıyorlar, yani bugün geliniyor, bakın [03:49:50] 23 tane orta vade program [03:49:54] açıklandı. Sinem hanım, ilk 2005'te açıklandığında [03:49:58] 3 yıl sonraki enflasyon hedefi neydi? [03:50:00] %5, yani 2025, şey [03:50:04] 2005, 2008'de 2008'de enflasyon [03:50:08] %5 olacaktı. 2008'de [03:50:12] e bugün 1 yıl sonraki [03:50:15] orta vade programda enflasyonunuzda hesabınızda [03:50:18] %12'lik sapma var bu kadar [03:50:21] olmaz gerçekten bu kadar olmaz hele bir de rasyonel politika [03:50:25] iddia e politikka izlediğini iddia ettiğiniz [03:50:28] bir eee uzmanı bu alanda [03:50:31] görevlendirdiyseniz yani adını da koyalım Mehmet Şimşek [03:50:34] inflation was supposed to be 5% in 2008. [03:50:38] Today, in the medium-term program for 1 year from now, [03:50:41] there is a 12% deviation in your inflation calculation. [03:50:45] This is too much, it really is too much. Especially when you claim [03:50:49] to be following a rational policy, and you have assigned an expert [03:50:53] in this field, let's call him Mehmet Şimşek, and despite all this, things are still at 32%, [03:50:56] "Oh, how wonderful, inflation is finally [03:50:59] falling," if you evaluate it that way. Also, let's not forget, Ms. Sinem, [03:51:02] Mr. President says the same thing every year: "Turkey's star is shining, [03:51:06] we are doing these things with quality, qualified personnel and people. [03:51:15] Our medium-term program is strong, the measures we have taken are strong, [03:51:19] you will see that Turkey is a country whose star is shining." [03:51:22] But the people's star has never shined, nor has Turkey's. It won't shine [03:51:26] with this inflation. But the reason is these... [03:51:29] decisions regarding the independence of institutions, regarding the Central Bank. [03:51:32] If you insist on changing the Central Bank Governor every year, [03:51:35] Ms. Sinem, it won't work. You cannot convince us that [03:51:38] you are fighting inflation. That is, if you say [03:51:42] "you don't know the interest rate policy, how it should be" and [03:51:45] for this reason you change ministers, you change Central Bank [03:51:47] policies, it won't work. This is only [03:51:50] an indication that you don't want to prevent inflation, [03:51:54] but rather more impoverishment. [03:51:58] I guess it's thought that [03:52:01] as poverty increases, the level of education probably decreases, [03:52:04] so those who vote for us increase, because they also had such a thesis, [03:52:08] as you know, the group deputy chairmen had said that [03:52:12] as the level of education decreases, those who vote for us increase. [03:52:15] But they are not aware, I mean, the world [03:52:18] is not what it was 20 years ago... Let's say Turkey, not the Turkey [03:52:21] of 20 years ago, nor the Turkey of 50 years ago. People, one way [03:52:25] or another, are learning lessons from this every day, [03:52:29] living every day. And also, you [03:52:33] can silence the media as much as you want, silence the opposition, [03:52:36] people go to the market every day, to the greengrocer, to the supermarket, [03:52:40] and there they face reality. [03:52:42] Now, these price hikes, Ercüment Akdeniz, have become [03:52:46] a fundamental economic indicator determining all pricing [03:52:49] behaviors. That is, transportation, [03:52:53] production costs, what kind of situation [03:52:57] is the citizen facing? Now, even if we assume that the elections [03:53:00] will be held on time, the government also has an expectation of being able to fix [03:53:04] the economy. The OVP was announced the other day, and there were some [03:53:07] deviations, or rather [03:53:10] updates, but now it's clear [03:53:13] that it won't go as planned, whether due to this or that, [03:53:17] whether geopolitical developments or domestic political [03:53:20] everything from A to Z will see price increases, and very severely. [03:53:24] I mean, this is very clear. And also, will it stop here? Will diesel stop [03:53:27] at 100 lira? I mean, how far will it go until the election? [03:53:31] These are cumulative price increases. [03:53:34] I mean, if they think, "we have allocated a certain budget," it's also in the OVP, [03:53:38] "so we will do some work on pensions, minimum wage, etc., [03:53:42] a quarter before the election," what is currently being done [03:53:45] and the price increases that will come until [03:53:47] that date will take that away. That's over, that's [03:53:51] in the past now. The job is not easy. [03:53:54] It's really difficult for the government in that regard. [03:53:58] But if we ask if this is a choice, a mistake, or incompetence, [03:54:02] I think it's a choice. There's a segment of 8-10 million [03:54:05] people in Turkey. If you have money, if you have financial power, [03:54:09] if you make money from money, you're not affected by anything. The rich get richer anyway. [03:54:13] But the base is breaking, the large majority is breaking. [03:54:16] When I hear diesel, I immediately think of farmers, I mean, producer farmers. [03:54:19] If agriculture and animal husbandry go, [03:54:23] how will you ensure resilience during wartime, during [03:54:26] global conflicts, during crises, during pandemics? [03:54:30] You are not an agricultural country that is self-sufficient. [03:54:33] How will you achieve this? From that [03:54:37] perspective, the situation is really not good. Now I remember the pandemic, [03:54:40] Biden was in power in the United [03:54:43] States. It swept through the whole world, it swept through the economy. [03:54:47] He gave 1.4 or 1.7 [03:54:50] trillion dollars in subsidies to his citizens. [03:54:52] He provided salary support, "they can't work, [03:54:56] they shouldn't starve," healthcare services and so [03:54:59] on. Now, for example, we say there is a [03:55:02] oil crisis, we say there is the Strait of Hormuz, now we say Yemen has been added, [03:55:06] now a fragile economy, okay, you've reduced industry, you've reduced [03:55:10] manufacturing, you say our services sector is strong. Honestly, excuse [03:55:13] me, in times like these, the services sector won't save you. If your industry [03:55:17] isn't strong, if your employment isn't strong, it won't save you. [03:55:20] But I mean, for example... "What are you giving your citizens during [03:55:24] such a period of hunger, poverty, and price hikes? What kind of subsidy are you giving? [03:55:28] There was a sliding scale to balance it, at least from taxes..." [03:55:31] Yes, I mean, maybe a regulation could be made in terms of taxes? I mean, given the situation, [03:55:35] given the circumstances, the fact that these taxes will remain [03:55:38] in force in the same way... [03:55:42] They couldn't do it, it's over, that story is over now. I mean, they [03:55:45] removed it, they removed the protection measure. Now the entire bill, the entire bitter [03:55:49] prescription is on the backs of the citizens, the villagers, the workers, [03:55:52] the retirees. Let me conclude with this: Look, we are not the same as Syria, [03:55:56] are we? Syria came out of a civil war, and as a journalist [03:56:00] who interviewed Syrians for years, I know very well. They returned, [03:56:03] I still meet them, I do interviews, we are not the same. I mean, there is no [03:56:06] infrastructure, the economy is not good, investments [03:56:10] are not as desired, there is hunger, 70% of the country is hungry [03:56:13] or something. A 40% price hike [03:56:16] came there on oil, and the people [03:56:20] are up in arms. Can't we be as good as Syria? [03:56:24] I'm asking this. I mean, the citizen should also ask themselves, [03:56:27] I never want to make a comparison, Turkey is a more modern country, [03:56:31] capitalism in Turkey is much more advanced, the tradition of trade union [03:56:35] democratic struggle in Turkey is very strong. [03:56:38] I mean, the left-wing tradition is very strong, the struggle to gain labor [03:56:42] rights is very strong. It cannot even be compared to Syria or Middle Eastern countries. [03:56:45] But which wave of price hikes is this, [03:56:49] which price hike frenzy? Then the citizen will ask themselves [03:56:52] or look at their own history, what did we do during such price hike periods, what [03:56:56] would we do? For example, what would the unions do? Now the farmers are [03:57:00] crying blood, they are revolting because of diesel. What is the chamber of [03:57:03] agriculture doing? What is the chamber of agriculture doing? What are the producer [03:57:06] farmer associations doing? The workers are crying blood. What are the union [03:57:10] confederations doing? No one should be offended, I mean, the citizen [03:57:13] should point the finger at themselves. I mean, [03:57:17] without unity, without demanding rights, without [03:57:20] pressure from below, no one gives [03:57:23] rights from above. I mean, it has come to this, [03:57:27] unfortunately, I mean, if we vote for this party, that party will save us. [03:57:31] Parties are important, elections are important too, of course, this is important. Yes, of course it's [03:57:35] important, but in Turkey's [03:57:38] tradition, there is always a democratic [03:57:41] struggle from below, a trade union struggle from below, [03:57:45] a struggle of workers from below. This struggle takes [03:57:48] a little more bread, it expands the democratic [03:57:52] space a little more, it makes May 1st [03:57:55] free, it develops trade union [03:57:59] freedoms. If this is not there, no one gives anything decent [03:58:03] from above to anyone, no offense. So, [03:58:06] elections are important, but a citizen should draw [03:58:09] conclusions for themselves from a situation that is only focused on elections. [03:58:13] In the past, there was a labor platform, there was a "no to privatizations" platform. Look, [03:58:17] we are talking about highways and bridges now. Is there a platform against [03:58:20] privatization now? Why isn't there one? I mean, there was one 10-20 years ago, [03:58:24] it could be done. Well, one might say, "there's a lot of pressure, there's a much [03:58:28] more authoritarian system, this and that." I mean, these are not excuses, they existed [03:58:32] before too, they existed in the 90s too. How did this country emerge [03:58:35] from the 1980 military coup? It emerged with student [03:58:38] protests and worker protests in 1986, 1987. [03:58:41] The spaces became free that way. I mean, how did the AKP come to power? [03:58:45] Let's remember that too. I remember how the DSP-MHP-Anap [03:58:48] coalition left. I mean, hundreds of [03:58:51] thousands were in the streets, protesting price hikes, protesting [03:58:55] inflation. That's how change came. Now, without such [03:58:58] a thing, no rights can be sought, no change can happen. [03:59:01] I mean, it's not right to dump the entire burden on political [03:59:05] parties either. I mean, trade unions, [03:59:08] people, citizens need to take [03:59:11] on tasks from this. And the opposition, as a whole, [03:59:15] I'm not making any party distinction here, I mean, as a whole, it's not [03:59:18] just election preparation, I mean... [03:59:22] They need to open channels where these people can take their problems [03:59:26] to the streets, where they can express their problems and win their rights. [03:59:29] I remember Poland, I always give it as an example. [03:59:32] Lech Walesa was a trade unionist in the change [03:59:36] of power, and he came to power with the power [03:59:39] coming from the factories and the trade union movement. He brought about a very big change. [03:59:43] in 2008,