IRINN — broadcast
20260806 113000 UTC
459 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] inside the economy is happening and
[00:00:03] is going on. I want to make an analogy that the width of the
[00:00:06] fever of a patient remains. When the
[00:00:10] fever of a patient reaches above 37, 38,
[00:00:14] 39, 40 degrees, a present doctor
[00:00:17] is never looking to outwardly bring down the fever.
[00:00:21] Just as in economics, no one should be looking to
[00:00:24] go and bring down the price of the عرض so that we can
[00:00:28] improve the economy of society. No, that's not how it works.
[00:00:32] A skilled doctor is someone who goes and removes the infection
[00:00:35] inside the patient's body. You
[00:00:38] must fight the infection
[00:00:42] and eliminate its root so that you can bring down the fever. You can artificially
[00:00:46] take a 39-degree fever and put
[00:00:49] it in a tub full of ice, and the fever will come down, but as
[00:00:53] soon as this patient takes their foot out of the tub, because the reality is that the fever
[00:00:57] is high, it goes up to 40 and 41 عرض. The same goes for
[00:01:00] the عرض. We must go and fix the structures, but
[00:01:03] the fundamental question is that, alright, if we want to take action
[00:01:07] in the structure, where should we aim?
[00:01:10] In an economy where more than 90% of our society's economy
[00:01:13] is in the hands of the government and its institutions and affiliated organizations,
[00:01:17] we must expect that inflation,
[00:01:20] meaning the imbalance that arises in
[00:01:24] the economy, is the result of the imbalance, the result of the imbalance that exists in
[00:01:27] the government's economy and in the government's budget.
[00:01:36] The inflation existing in our society is due to the imbalance and
[00:01:39] the government's budget deficit, which, Dr., so we can
[00:01:42] conclude that the most chronic factor of economic inflation
[00:01:46] in Iran is the government's own budget deficit. At least 75% of it
[00:01:50] is due to the government's budget deficit. Alright,
[00:01:53] now let's calculate this government imbalance.
[00:01:57] Because my approach in all my speeches and places where
[00:02:01] I speak is not just to point out the problems. I'm looking for solutions
[00:02:04] and I try to tell my friends and officials
[00:02:07] the solutions. Look, when
[00:02:10] we do root cause analysis and look at the root cause of inflation,
[00:02:14] we see that in the government sector, the government's imbalance
[00:02:18] has only two sources of income. The imbalance arises in
[00:02:22] the government when the government's revenues don't match its expenses.
[00:02:25] That's right. Alright, the government has two
[00:02:29] main sources of income. Schematically, it's either
[00:02:32] oil or taxes.
[00:02:36] And a government can be a strong and
[00:02:39] successful government if it can have stable,
[00:02:42] sustainable revenues for itself,
[00:02:46] stable and sustainable for itself and independent. When
[00:02:49] we look at these two sources of income, oil and taxes, you see that oil
[00:02:53] is not a stable and independent source of income
[00:02:57] that all viewers know more than we do.
[00:03:00] In recent decades, in recent years,
[00:03:04] and in recent months, it has been shown that we cannot
[00:03:08] rely on oil revenue. For us,
[00:03:11] this income is neither independent nor
[00:03:14] sustainable. You cannot rely on it. So we go to
[00:03:18] taxes. But it is our tax system that
[00:03:21] must be reformed so that the government can
[00:03:25] have good revenues. But this revenue generation by the government should not
[00:03:29] put pressure on the people, but rather
[00:03:32] boost the economy. Our tax system is not
[00:03:35] a suitable system and a fundamental revision
[00:03:38] must be made in that system. I will tell you that in the budget
[00:03:42] of 1405, the government's prediction for a
[00:03:45] budget of 525 trillion
[00:03:48] is that about close to 3 thousand trillion of this budget
[00:03:52] will be provided through taxes. Did you say that?
[00:03:55] 3 thousand trillion from
[00:03:58] this very tax system.
[00:04:05] We have fundamental flaws in our tax system. Our tax structure has
[00:04:08] fundamental problems, which I will give you two or three
[00:04:12] examples of, if you allow me. For example, suppose in
[00:04:15] the value-added tax system,
[00:04:19] which is going to be 9 to 10 percent or is being collected
[00:04:22] from the people, you have exempted almost 60 percent of society from
[00:04:26] value-added tax, and I am telling you the facts. Let
[00:04:30] me be frank and direct because we need to do root cause analysis. You exempted 60%,
[00:04:34] and those 40% who are not
[00:04:38] exempted usually go and collect the 60%
[00:04:41] from the people, but they don't pay it to the government.
[00:04:45] It's a vicious cycle, Dr. In this regard, or in the part, for example, let me just
[00:04:49] mention two or three of them, you will understand. Or in the part of the tax on
[00:04:53] empty and luxury houses, as you remember.
[00:04:56] You know what was our total collection in these 3 years?
[00:05:12] Let's have a collection of 6 trillion. If it's even one-tenth of it, it's 30 billion
[00:05:15] tomans. Yes,
[00:05:19] I'll say it again, 30 billion tomans compared to 6 thousand
[00:05:23] billion tomans that should have been collected. In our tax system for businesses,
[00:05:27] when you go and look there, you see that when
[00:05:30] I want Mr. Pezeshkian to be well informed about this matter,
[00:05:33] or for him to see this 3 thousand
[00:05:37] trillion that is in the budget. This will be available
[00:05:41] in a few years, because the tax
[00:05:47] that is determined for businesses today, when it is
[00:05:51] finalized, as it were,
[00:05:54] the taxpayers, everyone knows
[00:05:58] it, it goes to review, objection, dispute resolution board,
[00:06:01] council. This tax takes about three years. After three years
[00:06:05] that it is finished, two and a half to three years that it is finalized, then it takes another
[00:06:09] two to three years. I swear. Our tax system,
[00:06:42] I want to mention some figures, and I want
[00:06:46] our dear viewers to pay attention to this, Dr. Before you
[00:06:49] mention the figures, let me ask a question. Do we currently have
[00:06:53] conditions in our economy that truly
[00:06:56] make our economy reliant on taxes? Yes, I'll tell you. Look,
[00:06:59] we are collecting taxes.
[00:07:03] We are collecting taxes, but our tax collection method and
[00:07:06] our tax system are such
[00:07:10] that neither the government is satisfied, nor the people
[00:07:12] are satisfied, nor the industrialist is satisfied, nor the producer
[00:07:16] is satisfied, nor the service
[00:07:19] providers in the service sector. No one is satisfied with this system. This system has
[00:07:23] a fundamental problem, and I am surprised that the 14th government
[00:07:25] is currently in our tax system,
[00:07:29] for example, the head of our tax system is the same head
[00:07:32] who has been there for several previous governments. The tax
[00:07:35] team is the same team that was there before. The tax
[00:07:39] laws are also the same laws that were there before. Result.
[00:07:50] You don't change the coach, you don't bring in new players,
[00:07:54] you don't change your tactics, you don't change your laws, you don't
[00:07:58] change your technique, and you promise that in these 10 minutes of the game, the team that
[00:08:01] is two or three goals behind, you will win by five goals. That's impossible.
[00:08:05] We haven't seen any action in this regard.
[00:08:08] Before Mr. Madanizadeh became minister, even before he became minister,
[00:08:14] I also address him. He is a friend. We, I met him several times before he became
[00:08:18] minister. We had discussions with him, and he
[00:08:21] personally accepted the equations that I will tell
[00:08:25] you, that with a shift in our tax collection
[00:08:28] system, which I explained to him in detail, if there is time,
[00:08:31] I will also tell you and the viewers here, you can easily
[00:08:35] achieve significant achievements.
[00:08:39] For example, I would like to say that my proposal at that time was
[00:09:22] that now, in the midst of our discussion, it is also present. Your entire budget
[00:09:25] for the Ministry of Health was something around 1000 trillion at that time, for example,
[00:09:29] let's say, right? You, the Ministry of Health, with this
[00:09:33] 1000 trillion, is managing the health and treatment sector in such a way
[00:09:37] that almost half of the treatment costs are covered by the government and...
[00:09:40] If you allocate
[00:09:51] 200 trillion out of these 5000 trillion to the Ministry of Health,
[00:09:54] and 300 trillion is available to you, you can
[00:09:58] provide free medicine and treatment. I have calculated this. These are numbers,
[00:10:01] these have evidence. You can even make infant formula
[00:10:04] free for Iranian infants. Now, Mr. Beyarshad, what kind of plan
[00:10:08] is this that in this era of high prices, we should collect
[00:10:11] additional taxes? No, other things happen here.
[00:10:15] I want to tell you how the system can be reformed. If you
[00:10:19] do this, when you make treatment free with this
[00:10:22] 1% that you are collecting, you virtually forgive 40
[00:10:26] of the 7 insurance premiums to the people, because out of the 7 that salary earners
[00:10:30] pay for insurance, four of them go for treatment. Well, that
[00:10:33] is forgiven. In salaries of 20 million tomans, 90% of our society
[00:10:37] is 20 tomans, 4 20 million tomans, 800 thousand tomans.
[00:10:41] You put it in their pockets per month. With 1%, you collect
[00:10:45] 200 thousand tomans from them on salaries of 20 million, but you give them 800 tomans.
[00:10:48] Didn't you see? I said that 50% of the cost of
[00:10:51] treatment is paid by the people. Well, 50%.
[00:10:55] Based on evidence, 13% of Iranian people's income
[00:10:59] per year per month goes for treatment.
[00:11:03] When you make treatment free with this 1%, in salaries of 20 million
[00:11:06] tomans, 13 of 20 tomans, meaning 2 million 600 tomans
[00:11:10] here, 800 tomans and 2.6 million, 3.4 million, you give to the people.
[00:11:14] Then what happens next is, Mrs. Dilo,
[00:11:17] I want you to understand this example that I am giving
[00:11:21] concretely. Madani Zadeh himself has seen and confirmed this.
[00:11:30] And with this, you tell the Ministry of Health
[00:11:33] that all expenses, meaning the budget that you receive from the government's budget,
[00:11:37] must be removed from the expense line item. Well, that one thousand
[00:11:40] trillion that you remove is the entire government budget deficit
[00:11:44] that I said causes 75% of inflation.
[00:11:47] When you take the entire budget of the Ministry of Health
[00:11:51] out of the expense line item, suddenly you have a deficit.
[00:12:25] Tomans will fall after some time. Well, look, there are these
[00:12:28] patterns and many other patterns. Well, Dr., let me ask a question
[00:12:32] here. You finally gave an example of a cycle
[00:12:35] that is very strange why it doesn't
[00:12:39] occur to our economic policymakers, or if it does, why can't they implement it? This
[00:12:42] is a part that always comes up in these
[00:12:45] economic discussions that, well, what does it mean? Why didn't
[00:12:49] we reach it here in the government?
[00:12:53] But regarding the role of liquidity growth,
[00:12:57] there is always talk about the fact that we have too much liquidity
[00:13:00] in the country, too much money printing, and this has greatly expanded
[00:13:03] the inflationary base and similar issues.
[00:13:07] Does really always excessive liquidity lead to
[00:13:11] inflation, or does improper economic
[00:13:14] governance over this liquidity have a very significant impact?
[00:13:17] We have a very simple formula in economics that says
[00:13:21] that the maximum liquidity, with an increase
[00:13:25] in the monetary base multiplied by the money multiplier,
[00:13:28] the volume of liquidity in society changes.
[00:13:32] When you, right now, let me give you a simple
[00:13:35] example. We currently have something close
[00:13:39] to 19 thousand trillion in real
[00:13:42] terms, 19 thousand trillion (1 trillion is 1000
[00:13:46] billion tomans). We have 19 thousand trillion
[00:13:49] in liquidity. When you divide this by 95 billion
[00:13:52] dollars, roughly the country's foreign exchange income. Right now, the total
[00:13:56] foreign exchange income of our country, if at best, 95 19 thousand divided by
[00:14:00] 95, you reach this 200 thousand toman dollar that
[00:14:03] you are at now. Well, one of the ways that
[00:14:07] we are discussing is that you want to
[00:14:10] manage the price of foreign currency.
[00:14:14] Well, the denominator is 95 billion dollars,
[00:14:17] and its issues are not in our hands, but you can make
[00:14:21] moves with the numerator to reduce the volume of liquidity.
[00:14:25] That's right. Why is the volume of liquidity
[00:14:28] why did that budget deficit arise? Because the bank
[00:14:32] is asked to print money to compensate for the budget deficit. This goes and sits in
[00:14:35] the numerator. That's right. You
[00:14:38] can, by creating proper and
[00:14:42] productive activities, absorb this liquidity.
[00:14:45] That's right. Let me say a short sentence.
[00:14:49] Our stock market must be reformed, not with this system that I'm talking about.
[00:14:52] Every thousand, every unit of
[00:14:56] production that goes on the stock exchange board can absorb
[00:15:00] liquidity by a factor of 4. That's right.
[00:15:03] Meaning, if we had a thousand trillion of knowledge-based activities
[00:15:07] that have over 1203% profit, and they could deliver,
[00:15:11] if we allowed them to go to the stock market, which we prevented,
[00:15:14] if we allowed them to go, just these knowledge-based companies would absorb
[00:15:18] 4 thousand trillion out of those 19 thousand. If the government
[00:15:22] guarantees these activities based on the economics of
[00:15:25] Iran, if the government guarantees these
[00:15:29] and they go on the stock exchange board, these knowledge-based companies can, with a factor
[00:15:33] of 10, meaning 10 thousand trillion, absorb out of those 19. But
[00:15:36] we have also restricted the stock market. We say that only activities are allowed to come to
[00:15:40] the stock market that, as it were, have worked for 3 years,
[00:15:44] are public companies, and have a positive balance sheet.
[00:15:48] This young, thoughtful graduate of Sharif and Polytechnic,
[00:15:51] is not a public company to go, but he has a plan, 130 degrees. We must support
[00:15:55] these so that they come so that
[00:15:59] we can make that numerator smaller. Thank you very much, Dr. We are with
[00:16:02] Dr. Jafar Qadri, a member of the Economic Commission of the Islamic Consultative Assembly.
[00:16:05] I greet you. Welcome to today's economy table.
[00:16:09] In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. I also greet
[00:16:12] you, dear guests, and dear viewers,
[00:16:15] and wish you a good
[00:16:26] inflation solutions with Dr. Lavasani, and I want
[00:16:30] you to tell us what role sanctions, currency fluctuations,
[00:16:34] inflationary expectations, and similar issues
[00:16:38] have played in creating this inflation that we are currently
[00:16:42] experiencing. Well, it is clear that in these conditions where the
[00:16:44] country is engaged in sanctions, inflation, and limitations
[00:16:48] for using international financial resources,
[00:16:52] it is undoubtedly true that these affect
[00:16:55] inflation. They affect inflationary expectations
[00:16:58] for both aggregate supply
[00:17:02] and aggregate demand. But what
[00:17:06] should be paid more attention to in our country
[00:17:09] right now is that
[00:17:12] we must use our internal capacities. Perhaps
[00:17:16] some international variables
[00:17:19] can affect our work, and we may not have
[00:17:23] supervisory control over them, but we can effectively
[00:17:27] use the tools and levers that are in our own hands.
[00:17:30] As they explained, if we can
[00:17:34] create conditions for the entry of capital into the stock market,
[00:17:38] and also support non-debt
[00:17:41] financing tools in the country,
[00:17:44] and in these circumstances where people are concerned
[00:17:47] about preserving their purchasing power, they turn to
[00:17:50] real assets such as cars,
[00:17:54] foreign currency, coins, land, and housing. And
[00:17:57] precisely, most of these have no consistency or correlation with
[00:18:01] any productive capacities. If we have funds
[00:18:05] with fixed incomes or the issue of foreign currency deposits, or the issue
[00:18:09] of issuing foreign currency Murabaha bonds,
[00:18:12] or the issue of foreign currency project funds within the country, even
[00:18:16] rial project funds, if we launch them within the country, these
[00:18:20] small public capitals will enter the productive
[00:18:23] sectors and can develop our capacities. In terms of improving the business
[00:18:26] environment, if we help
[00:18:29] to precisely speed up the receipt
[00:18:32] of licenses and remove the obstacles and problems
[00:18:36] that exist for producers,
[00:19:08] some of them might have implemented it partially. It must be followed up, and the government
[00:19:11] must truly pursue these as a belief and conviction.
[00:19:15] Now, if we want to use tools and levers such as
[00:19:19] warnings and similar issues
[00:19:22] for each case, this makes
[00:19:26] the work a bit difficult until these
[00:19:29] tools and levers are precisely used
[00:19:33] as effective and efficient tools If governments,
[00:20:02] by which I don't mean a specific government, if governments don't want
[00:20:05] to implement these important laws, how many more years do we have to
[00:20:09] endure this severe inflation? Yes,
[00:20:13] as I mentioned, and
[00:20:15] this method and approaches that can, in these
[00:20:19] inflationary conditions, precisely absorb
[00:20:21] liquidity and also preserve
[00:20:25] people's purchasing power, and also lead
[00:20:29] to an increase in productive capacities. If these are not utilized,
[00:20:32] well, with these methods that sometimes
[00:20:36] themselves lead to an escalation of inflation, these may solve
[00:20:40] one problem, but create dozens of others. But
[00:20:43] we must move in a direction where, precisely in these conditions, non-debt
[00:20:47] financing methods are utilized.
[00:20:51] Dr. Qadri, please stay with us. Let's watch a report on
[00:20:55] the tax on speculation. One of the important laws that should have been implemented,
[00:20:59] but it wasn't very successful in its implementation.
[00:21:03] Let's see what its implementation conditions are like. Let's watch the report, and we'll be
[00:21:13] Don't take any tax for one house. If there are two,
[00:21:16] take a percentage. If there are three, a higher percentage. Four, five,
[00:21:20] the president means the speculators who have
[00:21:24] disrupted the markets and are affecting
[00:21:27] the normal lives of people. He has invested all his money,
[00:21:30] for example, when he saw the currency go up, he went and bought currency.
[00:21:34] It was last August when the law on speculation
[00:21:37] and profit tax was approved by the parliament.
[00:21:41] The tax system must support
[00:21:44] productive activities and, if necessary, prevent
[00:21:48] some activities that cause
[00:21:50] uncertainty, instability, and,
[00:21:54] in fact, the diversion of resources to non-productive
[00:21:57] sectors. The emphasis on production,
[00:22:00] which has been repeatedly mentioned in the words of the martyred leader,
[00:22:04] was that if capital is used in production, it will no longer
[00:22:07] go towards harmful activities
[00:22:11] like buying gold, buying foreign currency,
[00:22:15] and such. The gold, foreign currency,
[00:22:18] cryptocurrency, housing, and automobile markets are covered by
[00:22:22] this law. All over the world, they use the CGT law.
[00:22:26] It is a proven law. About more than, perhaps
[00:22:30] over 120 countries have a very important
[00:22:33] tax base called capital gains tax. According to
[00:22:37] members of parliament, this law is a tool for
[00:22:40] controlling inflation in markets. We, in
[00:22:44] fact, this law did not come to fight the rich.
[00:22:47] This is not a wealth tax. This is a
[00:22:51] speculation tax. We said that if you want to profit from this
[00:22:53] path and this profitability
[00:22:57] leads to, let's say, asset goods like
[00:23:00] housing and cars becoming expensive,
[00:23:04] you should pay more tax.
[00:23:07] A review of the speculation and profit tax law shows
[00:23:11] that only 1 to 5 percent of the economic
[00:23:14] society are subject to this law. The rest are exempt
[00:23:18] from this tax. Narges Moazzez, IRIB News Agency. and
[00:23:22] Sima. Yes, thank you very much to Ms.
[00:23:26] for preparing this report. Dr.
[00:23:29] Lavasani, let's go back to you.
[00:23:33] Every day we hear new things. For example,
[00:23:36] speculators have gone to the land market, they have gone to
[00:23:40] housing, they have gone to car dealing. One
[00:23:43] day they sell dollars, one day they rush to buy dollars, one day they sell
[00:23:47] coins, one day they buy coins, and people suffer from
[00:23:50] a lot of economic turmoil because not everyone has the expertise for these things,
[00:23:54] but their turmoil and inflationary expectations become very high.
[00:23:57] This law was supposed to prevent it. What happened? Look, inflation,
[00:24:01] the reality is that inflation is a
[00:24:04] penalty that you impose on consumers
[00:24:08] and producers. Inflation
[00:24:10] means this, and it is a reward that we pay
[00:24:14] to speculators and dealers. In the automotive sector,
[00:24:16] as you mentioned, when
[00:24:18] you look at the statistics, last year,
[00:24:22] our domestic car manufacturers lost about 350 trillion tomans.
[00:24:26] That's right. But when you
[00:24:30] look at the statistics, these are statistics, you find
[00:24:33] that car speculators made about 800 trillion
[00:24:36] tomans, 750 to 800 trillion tomans.
[00:24:39] Mr. Minister of Economy, even if he knew the laws of
[00:24:43] physics, this money went from one place
[00:24:47] to another. Right?
[00:24:50] We have made the
[00:24:53] speculation and brokerage market safe in our country
[00:24:56] and we are putting people's livelihoods
[00:24:59] in a difficult situation. In the housing sector,
[00:25:02] it's even worse. Look,
[00:25:06] I have a discussion, and it is that
[00:25:09] the housing prices in our country are not what they should be right now.
[00:25:13] Right? Let me give you a simple
[00:25:17] example. You can see
[00:25:20] right now, in the lives of people in this very city,
[00:25:23] someone who has a house or land gives it to a builder to build
[00:25:27] and sell. He is a builder. A company comes and says
[00:25:31] that the land is from you, free, 50% for the building
[00:25:35] he builds, he says 50% of the ten units he builds are yours,
[00:25:38] 50% are for them. We all see it, right?
[00:25:42] A person who has 300 square meters of land
[00:25:45] knows how to do this and becomes the owner of 5 apartments out of 10. Mr. Government
[00:25:49] of the Islamic Republic, you have 1 million and 648 thousand square
[00:25:53] kilometers of land. You have 32 banks,
[00:25:57] each of which has two investment companies and a construction company.
[00:26:00] That makes 64 rich companies. Call them
[00:26:04] and tell them, "I'll give you land, come and build." In the automotive
[00:26:07] sector, I want to give you some very sad
[00:26:11] statistics about the housing sector. I'm just telling
[00:26:15] you the number of your real estate agencies,
[00:26:19] which are the engine of price increases. Their job is to say
[00:26:22] that we take a percentage of the transaction, whether buying or selling or renting. That means the higher
[00:26:26] the price goes, the more we get. The number of our real estate agencies
[00:26:29] is about 15 times the number of pharmacies in the country,
[00:26:33] and two and a half times the number of general practitioners in the country. These
[00:26:36] are a synergistic engine, an engine for price
[00:26:40] increases. There is no supervision over them. Thank you very much, Dr.
[00:26:43] for the very good points you made. Dr. Qadri,
[00:26:46] we have about a minute to hear your opinion.
[00:26:49] Yes, as Dr. mentioned, if we
[00:26:53] implement this law completely, and in fact,
[00:26:57] if the necessary preparations are made,
[00:27:00] then the goal, as mentioned,
[00:27:03] is not to just generate income,
[00:27:07] but to direct activities
[00:27:11] towards productive sectors. And while we must
[00:27:14] completely remove the obstacles and problems that exist
[00:27:18] in productive sectors, we must create
[00:27:21] obstacles in non-productive sectors so that this liquidity goes
[00:27:25] towards productive sectors. And exactly,
[00:27:28] there are concerns created in society. The goal is not
[00:27:32] that if someone has a conventional car or
[00:27:36] has enough housing, they should be taxed, or if they have enough housing,
[00:27:39] the main goal is to prevent speculative
[00:27:42] activities, and these activities are precisely covered
[00:27:45] in this law. Perhaps initially, the rates
[00:27:48] may not be effective rates. We must try to
[00:27:52] reform these rates gradually, but the main issue must be set in motion.
[00:27:56] And precisely, the government has so far tried to
[00:27:59] make the preparations, and naturally,
[00:28:03] during this period, activities have been carried out by the tax organization.
[00:28:06] We have received reports from our friends in the tax organization
[00:28:09] that this itself can direct
[00:28:13] many of these activities towards
[00:28:16] productive sectors. That is, now, in these conditions, that
[00:28:20] every once in a while, we go and, for example,
[00:28:23] at such-and-such intersection, or in Ferdowsi Square street,
[00:28:27] we prevent the buying and selling of foreign currency, no, then these purchases
[00:28:31] and sales, these
[00:28:34] activities, can be completely regulated,
[00:28:37] and exactly, all purchases and sales can be brought under
[00:28:41] the control and supervision of the government, and those that have a speculative
[00:28:44] aspect will be dealt with. Thank you very much, Dr. Qadri, I bid you
[00:28:48] farewell.
[00:28:56] it has not yet been truly implemented to be able to reform
[00:28:59] these behaviors. We have 10 seconds of time, sir. In the automotive
[00:29:03] sector, our suggestion to the government is that
[00:29:06] the difference between the cost of a car, whether
[00:29:09] imported or domestically produced,
[00:29:13] the cost price, and the lowest market price, should be determined
[00:29:16] by inquiring from judicial and expert
[00:29:19] legal centers every week. This difference
[00:29:23] should be. This law will not succeed
[00:29:26] because this law has announced that we will take 70%
[00:29:29] of the difference. This 70% means, Mr. Dealer, go and
[00:29:33] raise the prices as much as you want. 30% is yours, 70% is the government's.
[00:29:36] You must tax 100% of this so that there is no profit for speculation.
[00:29:40] Thank you very much, Dr. Thank you for your valuable
[00:29:43] points, and we hope that the economic officials will see
[00:29:47] them, because we can only state this, the one who has to implement it
[00:30:22] In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. Hello dear viewers, following the publication of some
[00:30:25] content in the virtual space regarding the method of calculating
[00:30:29] the volume of internet packages, the Regulatory Organization
[00:30:32] of Radio Communications announced that the volume of internet packages has not
[00:30:36] decreased and no increasing coefficient is applied for calculating international
[00:30:40] internet consumption. This organization, in this
[00:30:43] announcement, asked subscribers if they have any ambiguity
[00:30:46] regarding the method of calculating the volume or the internet package tariff,
[00:30:50] to record the matter through the complaint response system at number 195
[00:30:54] so that it can be processed in the shortest possible time
[00:30:57] and the result can be announced to them.