IRINN — broadcast
20260915 163000 UTC
426 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:12] No one thought that this crisis would continue for
[00:00:16] 20 days and it is not clear how much longer it will continue.
[00:00:20] For this reason, the world oil market
[00:00:23] is under severe pressure from supply.
[00:00:27] We are seeing severe reactions, and we are reaching a stage
[00:00:30] where there is a possibility of an overshoot in oil prices
[00:00:34] with the slightest tension. Mr. Robati,
[00:00:38] that's why some people say, "Now the war has just begun." They say,
[00:00:41] "Now the war has just begun for them."
[00:00:44] We were involved in an economic war before,
[00:00:48] and we were sanctioned before. We were sanctioned.
[00:00:51] They were able to stage a coup d'état with the same atmosphere in the country.
[00:00:55] It was economic, right? Exactly.
[00:00:58] The story is that they are gradually
[00:01:01] feeling the pressures. And
[00:01:04] why exactly is the playing field turning around and the war moving to their side?
[00:01:18] this story so that we reach a conclusion." If we
[00:01:21] want to retreat at this point,
[00:01:24] what will happen? How will the situation be? I mean, this whole market can
[00:01:28] turn back again. I mean, all of these
[00:02:00] The point is that, yes, if the same agreement with Oman
[00:02:03] is to be made again and oil exports are opened, these
[00:02:07] will quickly refill the reserves, and oil prices will again
[00:02:11] rise for a long time. The signals that Trump is giving are, "Come on, this is a different situation now."
[00:02:14] Yes, this is it. The bond yield is going up, the US economy is under
[00:02:18] pressure, and
[00:02:21] oil prices are on the verge
[00:02:49] has been controlled at 110 until now, it will continue to be controlled.
[00:02:52] Suddenly, it might make
[00:02:56] those strange movements, and perhaps if
[00:03:00] there hadn't been the Islamabad memorandum or other events, that overshoot
[00:03:03] in oil would have happened much sooner. And that
[00:03:07] small window of opportunity that was created for
[00:03:11] reserves to be refilled and the market to calm down a bit, well, some say
[00:03:14] it won't happen that way. They say, "You don't know, America will eventually
[00:03:18] pull something out of its magic box with the extensive economic tools
[00:03:22] it has.
[00:03:38] know what the reason for people's livelihood is, why the situation
[00:03:42] is like this, what the solution is. What is it in America? What is it in Japan?
[00:03:45] And with a very precise
[00:03:49] estimation, it's clear what's happening. And indeed,
[00:03:52] America's economic tools now have a debt of 234 trillion
[00:03:56] dollars, and it's repaying this debt
[00:04:00] with new debt. That is, with new debt, with these new loans that go from one pocket to
[00:04:03] another. And every year, approximately 2 trillion dollars are added
[00:04:07] to that debt. They say it's the most indebted country in the world. If
[00:04:11] it had something strange in its magic box, it would have fixed
[00:04:14] that first, and then it would have moved on to other issues.
[00:04:18] And petrodollars wouldn't have been
[00:04:29] they have played not all their cards, but 80% of their cards.
[00:04:33] Maybe 20% of their cards are still unplayed, but
[00:04:37] I think Iran's unplayed cards
[00:04:39] are more. This is my guess and my analysis.
[00:04:43] And my conclusion is that our
[00:04:46] problem in the economic war and resilience,
[00:04:49] Mr. Razavi, our problem, dear viewers, is not
[00:04:53] America. Our problem is ourselves, our economic
[00:04:56] governance model. And
[00:05:01] now a series of political economy issues that are imposed on that governance
[00:05:04] model have caused us
[00:05:22] was good or bad, because some people say that I only mentioned its economic aspect. I know
[00:05:26] that some people say that it created an opportunity for us too. For example,
[00:05:30] the 80 million barrels that we sent out to sea,
[00:05:34] well, we had to do something for
[00:05:38] this to happen. Although, the naval blockade after the negotiations
[00:05:41] in Islamabad
[00:05:48] was supposed to be like that. And well, I don't care, some things like
[00:05:51] hitting infrastructure, we
[00:05:54] gained experience from this. We must admit
[00:05:58] that we, the Iranian nation, together, have the right to say that some
[00:06:02] things happened until we saw the 12-day war. We didn't know, for example, this thing or opinion, we
[00:06:05] knew it, we understood its practical
[00:06:08] positive and negative aspects. Now, they ask here, "What if oil prices go up?"
[00:06:12] I think on the first or second day of the war,
[00:06:16] Mr. Shakeri was on the phone in the program and said this point. Some people
[00:06:20] actually raised this as a criticism, but I think it was a very accurate and correct point that
[00:06:24] we were discussing with you before the program today, and this was emphasized:
[00:06:27] that if oil prices suddenly jump
[00:06:30] (let's call it an overshoot), a sudden jump
[00:06:33] to 120 dollars, 130 dollars, what do I know,
[00:06:37] 115 dollars, for example, sudden jumps might happen
[00:06:40] for the reasons you mentioned. Now, the second question is whether it's even good for us or not,
[00:06:44] because at first glance, it's good, right? It's a pressure, but on the other hand, there's always a point
[00:06:48] that they say a type of, that is, the pressure
[00:06:51] in the market now is for what? I'm saying this for the viewers to know.
[00:06:55] The question is getting long. The pressure is for what? The supply is low.
[00:06:58] A certain amount, a type
[00:07:01] of oil extraction exists that is specifically, for example, shale
[00:07:05] and some other forms. These
[00:07:08] are very expensive to produce.
[00:07:11] Therefore, when oil prices are low,
[00:07:25] millions of barrels will enter the market in a short period (not tomorrow,
[00:07:28] for example), and this will turn out to be against your interest.
[00:07:32] There's an answer that Mr. Shakeri also gave before, but now you
[00:07:35] can also say it: Is it good for us that oil prices go up, or not? Or rather,
[00:07:39] to what extent is it good for the other side?
[00:08:21] assumed that if the Strait of Hormuz is closed, right now,
[00:08:24] what will happen? So, 15-16 years
[00:08:28] ago, you took the trouble to examine the dependence
[00:08:31] of industrial countries on oil exported from the Strait of Hormuz, estimating the demand function
[00:08:34] for oil in the Persian Gulf. We ran several
[00:08:38] econometric models to see how really the elasticities
[00:08:42] are. Elasticity means the coefficient of change in variables
[00:08:45] relative to each other. That is, what happens to demand if the price becomes this? What happens to renewable
[00:08:49] energies? And so on. The output that
[00:08:52] we reached was that first, something that was addressed
[00:08:56] in the article at that time is that Saudi Arabia
[00:09:00] is waiting to make Yanbu a substitute for the Strait of Hormuz.
[00:09:03] That is, the same
[00:09:06] pipeline. Yes, that part. The
[00:09:09] conclusion of the article was, in line with what Mr.
[00:09:13] Khezab mentioned regarding whether high oil prices are beneficial or detrimental to us.
[00:09:16] The output of the article that we reached 16 years ago was
[00:09:20] that in the short term,
[00:09:24] raising oil prices by closing the strait and reducing
[00:09:27] supply will result
[00:09:30] in industrial countries having no solution,
[00:09:34] meaning they will be checkmated. They will be in a stalemate,
[00:09:37] they won't be able to do anything. And that
[00:09:40] price
[00:09:43] cannot be covered or
[00:09:47] managed by any means, and no
[00:09:49] change will occur in the structure of global oil demand
[00:09:53] in the short term. Short term, what period? A period
[00:09:57] between one to two years. One to two years
[00:10:01] from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, in a way that, according to
[00:10:04] our previous charts, the structure of the global energy market will be affected by a contract that
[00:10:07] will remain a source, and it will be able to influence
[00:10:10] this SPR, putting China under pressure. Now, Saudi Arabia is also under
[00:10:14] pressure from two fronts, and this is in the short
[00:10:17] term, and for war, this short term is important to us. We don't want to see
[00:10:21] what happens in the market structure in 5 years. We don't want to keep the Strait of
[00:10:25] Hormuz closed for 5 years, but
[00:10:29] the finding of the article was that in the long term, beyond two years, if the strait
[00:10:32] remains closed, it will gradually lose its importance in the global
[00:10:36] oil demand function, and
[00:10:40] shale oil will be substituted due to high oil prices.
[00:10:43] Renewable energies will be substituted.
[00:10:48] Other oil export routes like Yanbu
[00:10:51] and Bab el-Mandeb will replace the Strait of Hormuz. Of course, we discussed those materials,
[00:10:54] and they cannot be safe again. They won't be safe,
[00:10:58] but economically, they will supply the market.
[00:11:01] Yes, they can, but if the market was supplied at $60 oil,
[00:11:05] now it's supplied at $100. Then it will be supplied at $160,
[00:11:08] which again goes back to the bond yield.
[00:11:11] Well, this means a terrible inflation caused by
[00:11:15] cost-push or pressure from energy costs in the global
[00:11:18] economy, which will again
[00:11:26] the domestic situation. We have a serious dilemma now. People say that some
[00:11:30] are portraying it as either we have to address people's livelihood
[00:11:33] or we have to resist. This approach you are talking
[00:11:37] about, resilience, resilience,
[00:11:39] resilience, okay, let's accept it. If we
[00:11:43] maintain this line, America's situation will be
[00:11:46] ruined. We must be able to preserve ourselves, or not? Let's assume
[00:11:50] America's situation also worsened. When my economic situation is so
[00:11:54] bad that I don't know, so many percent of society
[00:11:57] are below the poverty line, there's pressure, inflation, what's the point? Whatever happened
[00:12:01] to America, happened. We must be able to remain. You
[00:12:05] made a point, you said, "I think the problem is not there, the problem is domestic,
[00:12:38] obvious. What caused
[00:12:41] Israel and
[00:12:44] America to covet attacking us? What was the reason?
[00:12:47] The reason was that they felt people were extremely
[00:12:51] dissatisfied economically, and with the
[00:12:57] actions they would take, it would lead to a series
[00:13:00] of events that would bring them to their ultimate goal, which is
[00:13:03] the disintegration of Iran. I'm not saying
[00:13:06] their ultimate goal is the overthrow of the Islamic Republic. By no means is their ultimate
[00:13:10] goal the disintegration of Iran. That's still there,
[00:13:14] and it's a gradual process,
[00:13:18] and it will reach that goal.
[00:13:25] for years, this discussion we are having now, Mr. Razavi, is not
[00:13:29] political, it's really not political, it's about numbers
[00:13:33] and figures. And if my writings
[00:13:36] are seen, we have always said these things from the perspective of an economic
[00:13:40] expert: that
[00:13:43] this economic approach will lead to
[00:13:47] what? What exactly is this, I mean, why
[00:13:50] does it lead to a cliff?
[00:13:54] Look, we have many
[00:13:57] and diverse issues in our economy.
[00:14:00] We have the energy issue, we have fuel smuggling,
[00:14:04] and imbalances, and
[00:14:07] so on and so forth. But in economics, we say "price,"
[00:14:11] or the price of governance. Then it shows
[00:14:15] itself in inflation. That is, if governance
[00:14:17] is good, it shows itself in inflation. If it's bad, it also shows itself
[00:14:21] in inflation. Economic governance
[00:14:25] is the root cause of all these issues. In our energy discussions,
[00:14:28] in all discussions about imbalances and so on,
[00:14:31] it's inflation. That is, unless you
[00:14:34] solve inflation in the Iranian economy, none
[00:14:38] of your problems will be solved. So, now if you make gasoline 87,000 tomans,
[00:14:42] tomorrow
[00:14:42] morning,
[00:14:46] in about 6 months, you'll have to make it 160,000 tomans
[00:14:50] again, because the root cause, inflation, has not disappeared. You
[00:14:53] have an inflation engine. Now, what is the reason
[00:14:57] for inflation in Iran? The reason for inflation
[00:15:00] in Iran is a series of structural issues. A
[00:15:04] part of it is sanctions. A
[00:15:06] part of it is global
[00:15:09] inflation. I give these
[00:15:12] 30% weight. 70% of our inflation
[00:15:16] is the unauthorized increase in the monetary
[00:15:20] base and liquidity.
[00:15:23] And 50 to 60% (between
[00:15:27] 40 and 60%) of that increase in the monetary base is due to
[00:15:29] banks. That is, look, our government now,
[00:15:33] in all past governments, you
[00:15:36] remember, right? There was one of the ministers
[00:15:40] who increased salaries by 50%. They fired him,
[00:15:43] didn't they? Yes. They fired him. He was the Minister of Labor
[00:15:46] under Raisi. Yes. They fired him because he wanted to
[00:15:50] increase salaries so much, saying it would cause inflation. Whereas, if you compare
[00:15:53] the amount of liquidity increase due to salary increases or food
[00:15:57] coupons or other issues with
[00:16:00] the liquidity that banks are creating due to imbalance
[00:16:04] and the main factors of those events,
[00:16:11] it's just a drop in the ocean. That is, even if you increase
[00:16:15] salaries by 100%, how are banks increasing
[00:16:18] liquidity? A bank is on the verge of bankruptcy.
[00:16:22] When this happens in the world, for example, in Britain,
[00:16:26] suddenly the British government closes seven banks, which it has done.
[00:16:29] It happened in Britain in history. You can search and see. It was a world
[00:16:33] war. Yes. Or in America, during the 2008
[00:16:37] crisis, they tell bankrupt banks in the morning, "Go hold a liquidation meeting." They close the bank.
[00:16:41] The bank, sir, is an economic institution. It's closed. You invested
[00:16:45] here. You made a mistake. We don't close it, do we? What do we do?
[00:16:48] We take money from our pockets,
[00:16:52] we create inflation by printing money, we go and cover
[00:16:56] the bank's imbalance. We print money not for
[00:17:00] people's situation, but to protect the bank. Exactly.
[00:17:03] Sometimes I print money for someone who can't buy
[00:17:07] even a kilo of meat in a year. I give them meat, which doesn't even raise inflation
[00:17:11] much because it doesn't manipulate the monetary base significantly.
[00:17:14] In fact, it might even boost production because it strengthens domestic production,
[00:17:18] and demand for it increases. I create money, create inflation,
[00:17:22] and bring inflation to people's
[00:17:24] tables so that those corrupt
[00:17:27] economic oligarchs' banks don't go
[00:17:31] bankrupt. Exactly, so their banks don't go bankrupt.
[00:17:34] So, what does this have to do with sanctions and the dichotomy of sanctions and the dichotomy
[00:17:38] of livelihood? What do I know? They probably say
[00:17:42] this bank is investing in some sensitive area, they say things like that.
[00:17:46] We should probably protect it. I'll give you a benchmark now, an
[00:17:49] example: Argentina,
[00:17:51] Egypt, Turkey,
[00:17:54] and
[00:17:57] Poland and Korea
[00:18:00] are countries that not only have good relations with America,
[00:18:04] but some are even colonies of America and Israel. Argentina is the second largest Jewish
[00:18:07] population in the world, after Israel. That is, Jews have a strong influence
[00:18:11] there. Their current president, who has a very close relationship with Netanyahu,
[00:18:15] Javier Milei, Argentina, has the worst economic situation in the world.
[00:18:18] The interest rate is around 80,
[00:18:22] and inflation is triple digits.
[00:18:24] Well, as a result,
[00:18:28] the condition
[00:18:30] for improving people's livelihood has absolutely no relation to this.
[00:18:34] Yes, I'm not saying sanctions are ineffective. Sanctions
[00:18:38] are a catalyst for our problems. That is, we
[00:18:41] have strange problems in
[00:18:43] our economy that if we sell oil
[00:18:47] and its money comes in, we can use the Dutch
[00:18:50] Disease mechanism to sweep those
[00:18:54] problems under the rug for now. But they won't be resolved
[00:18:58] by that. Exactly like what happened in 1973 after
[00:19:01] the oil shock of 1973 in Iran. As soon as that oil money is gone, we suddenly
[00:19:05] face a surge in inflation. Towards the end of Mohammad Reza
[00:19:09] Pahlavi's era, our inflation reached 245%, whereas
[00:19:13] before, it was always below 5-6%. Why? Because that petrodollar
[00:19:16] was no longer there, that oil money was no longer there to cover the problems. Well,
[00:19:20] here it's exactly the same. Sir, you have a terrible economic
[00:19:23] governance based on conflicting
[00:19:26] interests with the people, which is
[00:19:29] creating liquidity and inflation.
[00:19:32] Inflation whose benefit also doesn't go to
[00:19:35] the people. That is, the money you print, you don't use to increase salaries,
[00:19:39] you don't give goods to the people. If we do this, you say that
[00:19:43] compared to the inflation that exists to protect
[00:19:46] these financial institutions, this is nothing. So, if we
[00:19:49] print money, did I understand correctly? If we print money, I'll tell you the numbers
[00:19:53] and figures. In the crisis of 2017,
[00:19:57] wasn't it? The crisis of financial and credit institutions, where several of them were dissolved.
[00:20:00] Yes, in that year, our monetary base suddenly increased
[00:20:04] by 17%. It's a disaster, 17%.
[00:20:07] A monetary base that later led to terrible
[00:20:11] inflationary shocks. Why? The government came and printed money
[00:20:15] and sorted out those financial and credit institutions.
[00:20:18] Or, for example, a bank that recently entered
[00:20:22] the merger process with Bank Melli. Well, that wasn't liquidation.
[00:20:25] They opened it again within the national assets.
[00:20:29] Well, the question is, if we don't do this, in that same
[00:20:32] issue, I remember Mr. Rouhani,
[00:20:36] despite all the criticisms and his faults, said something like, "Someone who invested
[00:20:40] where they shouldn't have, and then the government has to pay their money,"
[00:20:43] which actually comes from the pockets of all the people, not the government. It was a reality
[00:20:47] here. The point is that, but the problem is,
[00:20:51] someone who looks at it says, for example, if you want to touch imbalanced banks,
[00:20:54] which, God bless, are not just one or two, it will create a security problem.
[00:20:57] In the literature of policy science, we have a term
[00:21:01] that says, "You don't have cost-free policy-making."
[00:21:04] You ultimately, every decision you
[00:21:08] make or don't make, some people get happy, some people get upset.
[00:21:11] You have to see where the national interest
[00:21:14] of the majority lies in which policy. Yes,
[00:21:18] maybe those 10% on the street,
[00:21:21] "Fereshteh ba Bala," will be upset by this policy if a bank goes bankrupt
[00:21:25] or is liquidated. But what about the people? What about
[00:21:28] the other 90% who have to pay the cost of that inflation? Ayandeh
[00:21:32] Bank. Excuse me, money was not only
[00:21:36] from Elahieh upwards. No, I'm talking about the majority.
[00:21:39] Small depositors are not a big number, or small
[00:22:29] these numbers and figures. Argentina, Egypt,
[00:22:33] Turkey, Poland. How many of these are we
[00:22:37] besieged by? We are actually under siege, blocked, as
[00:22:41] they say. They've physically stopped my oil
[00:22:44] exports. They claim that I don't know, they claim that these 30 million,
[00:22:48] 208 million, if it's more, there's no oil on the water to sell, and so on.
[00:22:51] My point is that, okay, you're saying
[00:22:54] that 70% of economic issues, for example, relate to domestic
[00:22:58] matters, and 30% are other issues. But the issue
[00:23:01] of siege, the issue of the maximum economic pressure campaign that America
[00:23:05] has launched. Now, please tell us, considering the discussion
[00:23:09] you mentioned at the beginning of your remarks, that America's situation
[00:23:12] has reached this point of resilience, and we also have a situation
[00:23:16] here. In this situation, if, for example,
[00:23:23] they continue very firmly, and tension remains
[00:23:27] high, how do you present your arguments
[00:23:31] in this situation? First, a new inflation should not be imposed
[00:23:35] on the people. That is, that money-printing engine must be shut down.
[00:23:38] The government should not pay for the banks' imbalances.
[00:23:41] This is the most important action that must be taken.
[00:23:45] Immediately, a very strict policy towards imbalanced
[00:23:48] banks, merging and dissolving them, so that
[00:23:52] at least we don't create inflation for ourselves. We have the inflation
[00:23:55] of siege, we have the inflation of cost pressure.
[00:23:59] Let's not create monetary inflation for ourselves from
[00:24:03] printing money to resolve bank imbalances.
[00:24:06] Second, Mr. Razavi, a country under siege
[00:24:09] that doesn't have foreign currency, how are 500-billion-rial and 400-billion-rial Lexus cars
[00:24:13] imported? How is foreign currency allocated for this? These countries'
[00:24:16] economy is a war economy.
[00:24:20] This is a war economy. If it's foreign currency, how are these things coming in?
[00:24:24] How are all these luxury goods that you see
[00:24:27] in the city and elsewhere coming in? With what
[00:24:30] foreign currency are they coming in? In what way are they being imported?
[00:24:49] that you are dealing with a mechanism inside
[00:24:52] the country where that bureaucratic
[00:24:55] system simply doesn't allow
[00:24:59] your knots to be untied. As you said, you know that
[00:25:02] in these two months of 1405,
[00:25:06] ۱۴۰۵
[00:25:09] our, excuse me, at the end
[00:25:12] of 1404 and then 1405, compared
[00:25:16] to 1404, our economic growth has gone up.
[00:25:20] Why? Because practically many government managers were not working. I emphasize
[00:25:24] again, I'm not talking about this government. What happens is that the government manager facilitates
[00:25:27] affairs. Who was it? An exporter gave an interview
[00:25:31] a while ago, saying, "I came from China to the Khorasan border in two
[00:25:35] weeks. I was in customs for three weeks." This was Mr. Laylaz.
[00:25:39] Well, he said, "I waited behind our own customs for three weeks." "I came there in two weeks."
[00:25:42] I passed the siege. Yes, I passed the siege and stayed in customs for a week.
[00:25:46] Well, what is my point? My point is that, yes,
[00:25:50] there is a siege, and the siege still exists. I also said what the solution to the siege is.
[00:25:53] That is, as he puts pressure on us, we must
[00:25:57] also apply our pressure. But people should be sure that the economy...
[00:26:01] Look, I'll give a few examples.
[00:26:32] The automotive industry, you might not believe it, the top 10 countries in the world,
[00:26:35] in terms of infrastructure, meaning the machinery our car manufacturers
[00:26:39] have, are capable of producing the latest cars in the world.
[00:26:43] Now, the fact that they don't produce them is due to management technology and so on.
[00:26:47] Well, and other issues. I want to tell
[00:26:50] you that Iran has so much capacity, so many
[00:26:54] resources, that firstly, it will never experience hyperinflation.
[00:26:58] Secondly, all ways
[00:27:01] of siege are manageable.
[00:27:26] With economic policy reforms, by
[00:27:28] prioritizing the interests of 99%,
[00:27:33] this is easily solvable, and on the other hand, we see America's situation as very
[00:27:36] sensitive. Then, look, even before, we have to break that,
[00:27:40] but from the domestic discussion,
[00:27:44] I mean, I want to illustrate this: if people's situation
[00:27:47] is bad, if we have inflation, if things are bad,
[00:27:51] and this inflation is also the cause of all other issues,
[00:27:55] what is the reason? The reason is that our
[00:27:58] economic management itself has flaws. That is, if I want to assign weight
[00:28:02] with numbers and figures,
[00:28:05] more than two-thirds of your problems can be
[00:28:09] solved if you fix your economic management model. One minute.
[00:28:12] How can we end the war? America should give up
[00:28:16] hope that there are some people in Iran who want to surrender,
[00:28:19] and people's livelihood must be covered,
[00:28:22] not with money. The government must provide
[00:28:26] all Iranian people with
[00:28:29] their UBI or at least
[00:28:32] their daily caloric needs through goods, not
[00:28:36] goods that lose value against inflation every day.
[00:28:45] we have based on what the oil price was,
[00:28:49] that 20 billion dollars is nothing, we have a little
[00:28:52] more. We sold this
[00:28:55] much more expensively. Even if we sell for less, it was not less, we have rejected it from
[00:28:59] the blockade. We have been discussing this for a month now and until the end of the year and more.
[00:29:32] The stormy, most enduring battlements
[00:29:35] of history. The Citadel and the Mosque of Ali Shah
[00:29:38] are the identity of the resistance
[00:29:40] of Azerbaijan and the steadfastness of the Iranian
[00:29:44] nation against oppressors and
[00:29:47] aggressors. The fortress of the defenders of Iran and
[00:29:50] the arena of the Mujahideen of the Constitutional Revolution and today
[00:29:54] this proud wounded in the ages
[00:29:57] is observing the national event of Iran,
[00:30:01] East Azerbaijan. Iran. The Citadel
[00:30:04] of Tabriz, its head in the sky, its foot in
[00:30:08] the soil of Iran. Iran,
[00:30:11] East Azerbaijan, Iran.
[00:30:31] Hello. Welcome to the 2:30 news from the News Channel.
[00:30:35] The amount of ration cards will increase in mid-October.
[00:30:38] The government spokesman has given this news and said that the amount of
[00:30:42] ration cards for vulnerable groups will increase
[00:30:45] and it is not related to the payment of subsidies and other
[00:30:49] livelihood aid from the government. Ms. Mohajerani also
[00:30:52] said that the approved resolution of the share of gasoline
[00:30:56] for new cars over one billion will also be discussed.