IRINN — broadcast
20260920 080000 UTC
482 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] no God. god but
[00:00:20] It is 11:30. Welcome to this news section.
[00:00:23] 80% reduction in drowning victims in the sea. The head
[00:00:27] of the country's social affairs organization said on the sidelines of the Social Council
[00:00:31] that integrated management of the coasts is a strategic issue in which 19
[00:00:34] organizations are involved
[00:00:36] in its implementation.
[00:00:40] Fortunately, the number of drowned people
[00:00:43] on our coasts has seriously decreased. In some
[00:00:46] cases, it has even decreased by up to 80%, thanks to God. The number of
[00:00:50] drowned people on our coasts has decreased.
[00:00:53] Of course, in the past 10 years, during this
[00:00:56] summer that we have passed, only in two provinces.
[00:01:20] This is what Americans use for the Trump administration. The news website EMSNA
[00:01:24] reported. The results of the YouGov Economist poll show
[00:01:27] that 53% of voters
[00:01:34] also use the word "dangerous" to describe him.
[00:01:37] After these two words, the words "detached from
[00:01:41] society" with 47% and "ruthless" with
[00:01:45] 46% are in the next ranks. EMS News
[00:01:48] also reported that Democrats have launched an investigation into
[00:01:51] the private wedding ceremony of
[00:01:55] the payment of its exorbitant
[00:01:59] costs by a foreign individual has sparked criticism about Trump and
[00:02:02] The UN
[00:02:06] special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied territories
[00:02:10] compared the killing of thousands of children in Gaza
[00:02:13] to the actions of the Nazis during the Holocaust.
[00:02:16] Francesca said about the killing of Gazan children by
[00:02:20] the Zionist regime on the pretext of them becoming terrorists in adulthood:
[00:02:23] This was the same argument that the Nazis
[00:02:26] used to justify the killing of children in
[00:02:32] The government media office in Gaza announced last month that the Zionist regime has
[00:02:36] martyred more than 21,500 children
[00:02:39] since the start of the war in the Gaza Strip in October
[00:02:43] 2023.
[00:02:44] Mohammed Al-Bukhaiti, a member
[00:02:47] of the political bureau of the Ansarullah movement in Yemen, warned other
[00:02:50] countries against cooperating with Saudi Arabia against Yemen.
[00:02:54] The member of the political bureau of the Ansarullah movement, stressing
[00:02:57] that Yemen is in a position to defend itself against the aggressor, said:
[00:03:01] Yemen has not attacked Pakistan or Turkey,
[00:03:05] and it was Saudi Arabia that, by attacking Yemen and sanctioning
[00:03:08] food and medicine for the people of this country, martyred hundreds of thousands
[00:03:12] of Yemenis. Thank you
[00:03:16] for joining us in this news section.
[00:03:24] I
[00:03:40] Ali
[00:03:46] the In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
[00:03:49] Hello and welcome to the "Narrative of Authority" program.
[00:03:53] In this part of the program, we will take a look at the latest news
[00:03:56] related to Iran in foreign media. I invite you
[00:04:00] to join us in the program. In the studio, we are hosting Dr.
[00:04:04] Ebrahim Shakouri, an expert and researcher in the international field. Dr.
[00:04:07] Shakouri, I greet you and welcome you. In the name of God, I also extend my greetings and respect
[00:04:11] to you and the honorable viewers, and I congratulate you on the birthday
[00:04:15] of Imam Hussein Askari (PBUH). May you live long, Dr. If you agree, let's start with Al Jazeera,
[00:04:18] where the "Jan Fadaian" exercise, which was held in Tehran,
[00:04:22] is still, in fact, several days after its occurrence,
[00:04:26] receiving media attention. Al Jazeera Qatar also, in an article,
[00:04:30] referred to this exercise and spoke about Iran's
[00:04:34] show of power in the midst of the war. Yes,
[00:04:37] this article that Al Jazeera referred to
[00:04:40] was the "Jan Fadaian" exercise on Friday, involving hundreds of thousands of people who registered
[00:04:44] from the heart of the country, and their number is more than that. It refers to
[00:04:48] the presence of armed women, the Shahed-136
[00:04:51] drone, and also anti-aircraft
[00:04:54] defense, and says that despite America's claims that
[00:04:57] it is under sanctions and siege and
[00:05:00] in isolation, Iran is now putting on a display of power that
[00:05:04] is in clear contradiction with the White House's narratives.
[00:05:08] Anyway, this Al Jazeera report is one
[00:05:11] of the good reports that since Friday, when this
[00:05:15] exercise began in Tehran, they have been analyzing the different
[00:05:19] aspects of this readiness, defensive capability, and the mobilization
[00:05:23] of the Iranian people, and putting it against
[00:05:27] the false media narratives of the White House. One point
[00:05:31] that is actually important is that a regional media
[00:05:34] outlet like Al Jazeera Qatar is addressing this issue, that the
[00:05:38] people are still present in the streets and
[00:05:41] gatherings during these six months, even after the 203rd night.
[00:05:45] One very important point is that
[00:05:49] in fact, many countries, especially Arab countries,
[00:05:52] are fundamentally unfamiliar with such a presence of their
[00:05:56] people. Yes, and this
[00:06:00] is despite the censorship of the past 47
[00:06:03] years, which is the popular support of the Islamic Republic of Iran. They tried to censor
[00:06:06] all the 22 Bahman rallies in these 47 years. In recent
[00:06:10] years, some media outlets in this region have come to cover it, because Iranian media
[00:06:14] in the external dimension, as well as media aligned with Iran, such as RT Russia,
[00:06:18] Al Mayadeen, and other more independent networks, have published
[00:06:22] it. The audience of those media outlets
[00:06:25] saw why their media censored it, and they were forced to refer to it reluctantly.
[00:06:29] But this admission of the popular support of the system
[00:06:33] and deterrent power in the current special situation, which is about 7
[00:06:36] months after the Trump war, is an admission of this domestic
[00:06:40] power and internal cohesion
[00:06:42] of Iran. The great achievements of the Yemeni armed forces
[00:06:46] have received attention from many media outlets around the world. Deutsche Welle
[00:06:50] also, in an article, referred to the Yemeni
[00:06:54] forces and capabilities and spoke about the "second Hezbollah
[00:06:57] of Iran" and the achievements that the Yemenis have made,
[00:07:01] and started its article with this analysis
[00:07:04] of how much power and capability
[00:07:08] the Yemenis have. Yes, Deutsche Welle, of course, wrote the article
[00:07:11] with an anti-Iranian tone and is somehow playing the mischievous game of "divide and
[00:07:15] conquer" to say, for example, that Ansarullah of Yemen's
[00:07:19] position has become more popular and stronger
[00:07:22] among Iranians than Hezbollah. It went forward with this rhetoric,
[00:07:26] but it is making good admissions. It says that the Yemenis were able to
[00:07:29] carry out actions such as upgrading their anti-aircraft
[00:07:33] missiles and shooting down Saudi F-15s, an action that perhaps
[00:07:37] did not happen in Lebanon. It also refers to
[00:07:40] the capabilities of the Yemenis in actually managing the
[00:07:44] Bab al-Mandeb Strait and the volume of
[00:07:48] energy and goods traffic that takes place from that region,
[00:07:52] and says that now these are Iran's superior hand after the Strait
[00:07:55] of Hormuz. The resistance axis controls two strategic
[00:07:58] straits in West Asia and increases its bargaining power in any
[00:08:02] meeting. Also, two thinkers,
[00:08:06] actually senior researchers from Chatham House, named Farea
[00:08:09] Al-Muslimi, say that Ansarullah is more valuable
[00:08:13] than what Hezbollah could have been. Andreas Krieg,
[00:08:16] a senior lecturer at King's College London's Department of War Studies,
[00:08:20] also says in this report that Ansarullah increasingly has strategic functions
[00:08:24] similar to Hezbollah for Iran, and is more useful in some respects. As I said,
[00:08:27] they try to highlight that English difference, but they have
[00:08:31] very interesting admissions that depict the strategic
[00:08:35] position of Ansarullah in the new regional situation. Another point
[00:08:38] that has received a lot of media attention was that, in fact, in the
[00:08:42] last couple of days, in addition to the Saudi oil pipeline
[00:08:46] being targeted by the Yemeni armed
[00:08:50] forces, the targeting of King Khalid Airport,
[00:08:53] the second largest airport in Saudi Arabia
[00:08:56] in Riyadh, received media attention. This shows
[00:09:00] the superior and long reach of the Yemenis deep
[00:09:04] into Saudi Arabia, but the Yemeni mujahideen have announced
[00:09:08] that they will retaliate from any origin whose territory is attacked.
[00:09:11] The airports you mentioned were among the places from which
[00:09:15] Saudi warplanes had repeatedly flown and
[00:09:18] targeted Yemeni facilities. Now they are retaliating, and
[00:09:22] the pipeline that news agencies like Reuters are now maneuvering
[00:09:26] over, saying that it will be repaired in a few weeks or months,
[00:09:29] is completely capable of being targeted again and
[00:09:33] more severely. Therefore, these 7 million barrels of oil that they claimed
[00:09:36] daily from this 1200-kilometer pipeline to the west
[00:09:39] of Saudi Arabia and also to the port are completely
[00:09:43] exposed to another incident. Another point that Saudi Arabia
[00:09:47] has actually informed, especially the Europeans,
[00:09:50] is that for at least the past two months, there will be no
[00:09:54] oil exports to European countries. Yes, and some large
[00:09:58] European refineries have held up to 10 tenders to secure their needed
[00:10:02] oil, oil whose price has stabilized above $100, and
[00:10:05] the Saudis have officially announced that they are unable to sell
[00:10:09] their product in the coming months. The Global Times, in an article,
[00:10:13] referred to China's stance against the US
[00:10:16] and said that China has complained about US
[00:10:20] sanctions against Russia and Iran and considered
[00:10:23] them to be against international laws. Yes, the information
[00:10:27] that the Chinese Ministry of Commerce released yesterday, Saturday, was reflected
[00:10:31] by the Global Times and refers to the new
[00:10:34] US sanctions law, which is actually a new plot.
[00:10:37] They came to apply Russia's sanctions to Iran's sanctions as a secondary
[00:10:41] measure and said that they would impose a 100% tariff on any country that
[00:10:45] deals with these two countries. But China has taken a firm
[00:10:48] stance and said that Washington has no right to
[00:10:52] put the countries that deal with these countries under the influence of sanctions
[00:10:55] because they are actually engaged with Washington.
[00:10:59] In May of this year, we also saw that the Chinese exempted the five petrochemical
[00:11:03] companies that worked with Iran from the scope of this US
[00:11:06] sanctions law. They confronted it, and this shows that
[00:11:10] the Americans' claim of isolation, sanctions, and siege
[00:11:14] has failed, and major countries like China and
[00:11:17] the China-Moscow-Tehran axis, in fact, Beijing-Moscow-Tehran, are confronting
[00:11:21] these US sanctions and this clear
[00:11:25] failure for US economic policies. The New York Times,
[00:11:29] in an article, stated that despite America's
[00:11:32] insistence and persistence, South Korea
[00:11:36] has refused to send troops to fight
[00:11:39] Iran. Yes, after Trump repeatedly raised on his
[00:11:43] fake social media that since we are now on the Korean
[00:11:46] Peninsula to defend South Korea against North Korean threats,
[00:11:50] we asked the South Korean president to provide us with
[00:11:53] military assistance in the Strait of Hormuz issue. However, South Korean
[00:11:57] leaders explicitly announced that we will not have any military intervention
[00:12:01] because they are afraid of this real and effective
[00:12:05] threat from Iran, which said that any party that has
[00:12:08] any military intervention in the region will be considered an aggressor
[00:12:12] and must bear the consequences. And South Korea is constantly
[00:12:16] emphasizing that we will not do such a thing. They even said that some of our ships that were in the Bab al-Mandab
[00:12:19] region and the Red Sea are there to protect South Korean
[00:12:23] cargo ships.
[00:12:25] They will not intervene in Trump's war. One point regarding the shortage
[00:12:29] of ammunition and weapons for the US in the region
[00:12:33] is that one of these countries was South
[00:12:36] Korea, which was forced to transfer its Patriot
[00:12:40] systems to the West Asian region during the war. Some analysts
[00:12:43] believe that if it directly enters
[00:12:47] the conflict, a great danger will threaten
[00:12:51] it. Yes, now the South Korean president is exactly
[00:12:55] stating that we will not intervene in Washington's
[00:12:58] military conflicts because they are afraid of the consequences, and as I mentioned, Iran
[00:13:02] is not joking in its threat. Any country that wants to help the US
[00:13:06] is actually helping the aggressor and its interests will
[00:13:10] be targeted. The Times, in an article, spoke about the consequences
[00:13:14] of the US war against Iran and about the skyrocketing
[00:13:17] energy prices, saying that
[00:13:20] costs no longer match incomes
[00:13:24] and costs are much higher than
[00:13:27] what American citizens can afford
[00:13:31] to pay for their energy bills with the incomes
[00:13:34] they earn. Yes, after the Trump
[00:13:37] war and the increase in fuel prices, especially gasoline and
[00:13:40] diesel in the West, especially in European countries, now the British
[00:13:44] government has proposed a support plan for businesses
[00:13:47] to reduce energy tariffs by three stages
[00:13:51] from the beginning of 2027, which is three months from now.
[00:13:54] However, businesses are complaining and saying that first, we cannot
[00:13:58] wait until then for you to give us a discount, and second, the trend of
[00:14:02] increasing fuel prices, especially diesel, is going in such a direction that even this
[00:14:06] reduction in tariffs that you are considering will not be helpful at all,
[00:14:09] and this shows that the energy crisis that Trump started in the West
[00:14:13] and Asia is now showing itself in the heart of the European
[00:14:17] economy, especially in England, and there is no bright
[00:14:20] outlook for it. A former Pentagon advisor
[00:14:24] had an interview and pointed out that Israel
[00:14:28] and the Zionist regime, without US support,
[00:14:31] have no power to confront their
[00:14:34] enemies. Let's watch this video together.
[00:14:36] Israel has no chance of
[00:14:41] survival, it has no
[00:14:44] chance of overpowering and dominating anybody. if you put that
[00:14:47] Israel, the greater Israel project up on the screen if you
[00:14:51] had map of that thing, the notion that any of that could be achieved by the israelis was...
[00:14:55] about us is absurd, the question that nobody wants
[00:14:59] to answer in Washington is, what interest do we have
[00:15:02] in the greater Israel project? the answer is none, no interest
[00:15:06] in that at all, that's crazy, but
[00:15:09] who controls the financial situation in New York City in
[00:15:12] Washington, controls it in London? well, you
[00:15:15] answer those questions and so only you see us committed to this crazy
[00:15:19] idea in the middle east on behalf of
[00:15:21] Israel.
[00:15:27] You are still watching "Narrative of Authority" on
[00:15:30] News Channel. The Japan Times also, in an article,
[00:15:34] referred to the lies of Trump, the US President,
[00:15:37] and said that contrary to the claims made by the US President,
[00:15:41] the supply of diesel has decreased after the war
[00:15:44] with Iran. Yes, Trump, on his
[00:15:48] fake social media network, once again wrote
[00:15:52] that the shortage of diesel and its price increase
[00:15:55] are due to the war between Russia and Ukraine. However, the Japan
[00:15:58] Times, in a report based on interviews with two researchers,
[00:16:02] emphasizes that the Trump war in the West Asian
[00:16:06] region and against Iran
[00:16:21] is the cause of Trump's war in the West Asian region. Rachel
[00:16:25] Ziemba, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American
[00:16:28] Security, also emphasizes that the new shortages are caused by Trump's war with Iran
[00:16:32] and have nothing to do with the Russia-Ukraine war. One point
[00:16:36] that is actually being talked about a lot in social media and the media
[00:16:39] is that many times the US president denies the entire
[00:16:43] crisis, but this time he has accepted it,
[00:16:46] but he has attributed its cause to Russia
[00:16:50] and the Ukraine war, the Russia-Ukraine war. Some
[00:16:53] citizens in the US are pointing out that basically
[00:16:57] a crisis is a crisis, and whatever its cause may be, it doesn't
[00:17:01] have much impact on American citizens. Yes, Trump and his Secretary of Defense,
[00:17:05] Mattis, tried to compare the war to "small potatoes,"
[00:17:08] saying it was nothing important, and that they would resolve it quickly. Now, citizens and
[00:17:12] users, in the comments they leave on Trump's
[00:17:15] fake social media network, are saying that this "small
[00:17:19] potato" has choked them, and they said they would resolve it in a week or two,
[00:17:23] but it has now dragged on for seven months.
[00:17:26] And this trend of downplaying
[00:17:29] the Iran war by pro-Trump media has failed.
[00:17:33] A more than 60% increase in diesel prices
[00:17:36] after the war with Iran itself is proof
[00:17:40] that the consequences of the Iran war and the instruments of
[00:17:44] power in Iran's hands have caused this
[00:17:47] to happen in the US. Yes, especially in some
[00:17:50] states like California, the price of diesel has gone above $10.
[00:17:54] They try to advertise the national price of $6-something
[00:17:58] and calm the market a bit, but a large state like
[00:18:02] California, with a population of about 40 million people, which is the technology
[00:18:06] and economic hub of the US, is showing its effect on the price
[00:18:09] of diesel, especially in terms of road traffic and agricultural
[00:18:13] machinery, which they themselves say will have a greater price effect
[00:18:16] on agricultural products and consumer products in stores in the coming
[00:18:20] weeks. Many media outlets are talking
[00:18:24] about this increase in fuel prices in the US and European
[00:18:27] countries. The Financial Times also, in an article,
[00:18:30] referred to the 5 consequences of the energy
[00:18:34] shock in global markets and said that if
[00:18:38] this trend continues and this crisis continues,
[00:18:41] in fact, the severity of the situation at the global
[00:18:44] level will also increase. Yes, this
[00:18:48] Financial Times report examines the economic aspect
[00:18:52] of the energy shock. It says that the energy market is not just
[00:18:55] related to the traditional view of oil prices. It has complex
[00:18:59] geopolitical issues of which oil
[00:19:02] prices are a part. Then it refers to
[00:19:05] the events that have happened. For example, it says that
[00:19:13] Hormuz used to be crossed, now it is not, and about 20 million
[00:19:16] is added to this figure daily because there is no
[00:19:20] special traffic. Then it says that the price of oil has reached $120
[00:19:24] and has stabilized above $100. Even yesterday, we had news
[00:19:27] that the price of physical and daily
[00:19:31] oil had reached $140 and was reflected in the media.
[00:19:34] Then it refers to the release of reserves in the US
[00:19:38] and says that this action has not had any result,
[00:19:41] despite efforts to release 2 million barrels of reserves daily.
[00:19:45] However, compared to the 20 million that used to pass through the Strait of Hormuz,
[00:19:49] it is 10% of that number and has had no effect on price reduction,
[00:19:52] and this is interpreted as a severe failure for the world energy
[00:19:56] market, which Trump claims he is managing. Al Jazeera
[00:20:00] Qatar, in an interesting article, referred to the
[00:20:03] upcoming elections in the US. Six weeks
[00:20:06] remain until the midterm elections
[00:20:09] in the US. Many media outlets are addressing this issue. Al Jazeera
[00:20:13] Qatar also, in an article, said how much the
[00:20:17] war with Iran affects the opinion and votes of
[00:20:20] voters in the US and said that
[00:20:23] 71% of voters believe
[00:20:27] that Donald Trump's government has no clear strategy
[00:20:31] in the war with Iran. The most
[00:20:34] interesting part of this poll is that Thunder News
[00:20:38] network, which supports Trump and is a Republican
[00:20:41] media, conducted this poll and published the results. Yes, as
[00:20:45] you mentioned, 71% of the voters who will go to the polls
[00:20:49] for the midterm congressional elections on November 3rd, a month and a half from now,
[00:20:53] said that Trump has no clear strategy to end the war,
[00:20:56] and 60% considered Trump's decision to go to war
[00:21:00] with Iran to be wrong. 61% expressed
[00:21:04] dissatisfaction with Trump's performance, and 47%
[00:21:07] of voters believe that this conflict will face the US with dangers
[00:21:11] in the long run and will make it more unstable. Anyway,
[00:21:14] these upcoming elections and these polls are highlighting
[00:21:17] the "blue wave" term in the US,
[00:21:20] meaning that Democrats might win the elections by a significant
[00:21:23] margin. When the Fox News poll,
[00:21:26] which is so supportive of the US President, talks
[00:21:30] about more than 71%
[00:21:33] believing that Trump and his team
[00:21:37] have no clear strategy for war with Iran, some
[00:21:40] are speculating that perhaps around 90% of
[00:21:43] Americans hold this view, which Fox News
[00:21:47] has reduced to 70%. Yes. Anyway,
[00:21:50] polls, depending on the political leaning of the institution
[00:21:54] conducting them, usually undergo some distortions. Now,
[00:21:57] anyway, these results are being interpreted as
[00:22:01] Trump's domestic political defeat and a disintegration
[00:22:04] even among Republicans who supported him. The statistics
[00:22:08] and figures presented by the Trump administration
[00:22:11] regarding the war with Iran have received a lot of media attention.
[00:22:15] The same Al Jazeera Qatar network also, in an
[00:22:18] article, spoke about the number of American casualties
[00:22:22] in the war with Iran, and the number of casualties
[00:22:25] is still viewed with skepticism.
[00:22:29] Yes, this report actually came
[00:22:32] after the Pentagon released some economic and military statistics.
[00:22:36] Now, in the US, both Al Jazeera and the Washington Post,
[00:22:40] a senior reporter who specializes in analyzing US war statistics
[00:22:43] in West Asia, has been working on this issue since the Iraq War.
[00:22:47] This has been highlighted, that you say there were 22 casualties,
[00:22:50] while the number of casualties was actually
[00:22:54] said to be 18 people, some say 22, some say 23.
[00:22:57] He says he interviewed 5 senior officials, four of whom
[00:23:01] did not want their names revealed, and they give these numbers and say why
[00:23:04] they are now being questioned. Even two members of Congress,
[00:23:07] one of them Maggie Gondelander, said that
[00:23:11] we are preparing a plan to prevent this lack of
[00:23:14] transparency from the US Department of War, which manipulates
[00:23:18] the statistics, and the White House.
[00:23:21] Last week, we also had Thomas Massie calling for the impeachment of
[00:23:25] Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who is also a Republican. This lack
[00:23:29] of trust in Pentagon statistics is now raising voices
[00:23:33] within the US system, and they believe that Trump
[00:23:36] is manipulating numbers and figures to downplay the situation,
[00:23:40] but the reality is something else. In addition to Al Jazeera Qatar, the Washington
[00:23:44] Post also, in an article, referred to this deception
[00:23:47] and manipulated and false statistics
[00:23:50] by the Pentagon. Yes, I mentioned
[00:23:53] that the Washington Post's analyst, who specializes
[00:23:57] in statistics, has highlighted these verbal and behavioral
[00:24:00] differences between Washington and, in fact, the White House
[00:24:04] and the Pentagon, and says that this lack of transparency
[00:24:07] is because you are afraid to give a transparent answer to public opinion
[00:24:11] about how many people were killed, but he says that the images
[00:24:15] and destruction of our bases in the West Asian region show
[00:24:19] that the number of casualties is more than what the Pentagon
[00:24:22] is admitting. The Telegraph also, in an interesting
[00:24:26] article, referred to Iran's power and authority
[00:24:29] and said that Iran has shown in the war
[00:24:32] with the US that it can expel the US from the West
[00:24:35] Asian region. Mr. Daniel DePetris, a researcher at the
[00:24:39] Washington Institute for Defense Priorities, wrote this
[00:24:42] article in the Telegraph, which is a comprehensive
[00:24:45] article that actually questions
[00:24:48] with this phrase that every official who takes the microphone
[00:24:52] says that the war is likely to end soon. Trump insists
[00:24:56] that he will end the war after the elections,
[00:24:58] but he says the reality is not what
[00:25:02] senior White House officials are saying. He says that
[00:25:05] this optimistic view that the Trump administration has adopted
[00:25:08] does not match these statistics, and the Trump
[00:25:12] war is not actually going according to plan,
[00:25:15] and from the first week, he says, it was like this that
[00:25:19] they were lying, downplaying it, but the reality on the ground shows something else.
[00:25:22] Then he refers to the US military policy in the past 30
[00:25:26] years in the West Asian region and that it claimed to have
[00:25:30] established military bases in the southern Persian Gulf littoral states
[00:25:34] to defend them, but now he says that Arab countries in
[00:25:37] Riyadh, Doha, Qatar, and other places are looking into the fact that the
[00:25:41] presence of US bases has actually increased their vulnerability
[00:25:44] and they are looking for safer options. And this US military
[00:25:48] strategy in the past 3 decades has been questioned, and Iran
[00:25:52] has shown that it can break the claimed hegemony
[00:25:54] of the White House in West Asia. One point regarding the expulsion
[00:25:58] of the US from the region is that Americans probably thought
[00:26:02] that they would be expelled from the region through negotiation or dialogue.
[00:26:06] Many analysts are addressing this issue, considering the heavy
[00:26:10] blows that Iran has inflicted on US bases in the region.
[00:26:14] Now, it is no longer cost-effective for Americans
[00:26:17] to want to rebuild these bases and basically
[00:26:21] stay there, and the host countries also know
[00:26:25] that it will not benefit them much. In fact, the Chief of Staff
[00:26:28] of the US Army said the same thing at a press conference last
[00:26:32] week. Especially in Bahrain, where there was a naval base,
[00:26:36] he said that almost nothing is left and it is not cost-effective to rebuild.
[00:26:40] The interesting point of this article, which I will mention at the end, is that it says
[00:26:43] that many articles will be written in the future about the rationality
[00:26:46] of launching Trump's war against Iran, which no one in the region
[00:26:50] except Israel supports. Very well, thank you very much, Mr. Dr. Ebrahim
[00:26:54] Shakouri, expert and researcher in the international
[00:26:57] field. Thank you for your companionship, dear viewers. While saying goodbye,
[00:27:01] I invite you to continue
[00:27:32] watching. In the name of God, Light of Light. In the
[00:27:36] name of God, Light
[00:27:39] upon Light. In the name of
[00:27:43] God, Light upon Light.
[00:27:46] In the name of God, Light
[00:27:50] upon Light. In the name of
[00:27:54] God, Light
[00:27:56] upon In
[00:27:59] the name
[00:28:02] of God, in
[00:28:06] the
[00:28:07] name
[00:28:10] of
[00:28:12] God.
[00:28:14] God is
[00:28:17] great.
[00:28:22] God
[00:28:25] is great.
[00:28:28] I
[00:28:32] bear witness
[00:28:36] that
[00:28:42] there is no
[00:28:46] god
[00:28:51] but God.
[00:28:54] I
[00:28:57] bear
[00:29:03] witness that Muhammad
[00:29:07] is
[00:29:12] the Messenger
[00:29:15] of
[00:29:17] God.
[00:29:26] bear
[00:29:31] witness
[00:29:32] that
[00:29:42] is
[00:30:01] guardian
[00:30:04] of
[00:30:06] God. I
[00:30:09] bear
[00:30:13] witness
[00:30:14] that
[00:30:18] Ali is
[00:30:21] the
[00:30:26] proof
[00:30:29] of God.
[00:30:36] There is