IRINN — broadcast
20261012 073000 UTC
468 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] it was England anyway. These contradictions were
[00:00:04] certainly known to the Americans
[00:00:08] who wrote the speech of the US Secretary of State,
[00:00:11] but they deliberately ignored them
[00:00:15] merely to justify
[00:00:19] aggression and violence.
[00:00:22] And
[00:00:23] definitely,
[00:00:26] European countries, those who consider themselves the legacy
[00:00:31] of Western civilization and Greek civilization, definitely have a duty
[00:00:35] in this regard to clarify their positions. This means
[00:00:39] that at the same time that
[00:00:42] America gives a civilizational cover and framework
[00:00:45] to its military aggression against Iran, at the same time,
[00:00:48] it launches an unprecedented attack on
[00:00:52] the same normative and
[00:00:56] institutional framework that
[00:00:58] was established after World War II. What does
[00:01:01] this mean? These are questions that
[00:01:04] everyone,
[00:01:07] especially Western parties, must endure
[00:01:11] and answer. Ms. Irana,
[00:01:13] please speak.
[00:01:16] Hello, Mr. Spokesperson, good day to you. Mr. Spokesperson, the US President
[00:01:20] has recently repeatedly claimed in various statements
[00:01:23] that the Strait of Hormuz has returned to its normal course
[00:01:27] in energy transfer. And various analyses
[00:01:30] are published about the transfer of oil from different countries from the north and
[00:01:33] south of this strait, and it is claimed that
[00:01:37] Iran has lost its leverage in this region. What is the view
[00:01:41] of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in this regard? What is happening in this waterway?
[00:01:44] Thank you.
[00:01:51] Today is Hafez Day,
[00:01:52] isn't it?
[00:01:55] Of course, this poem is not by Hafez, but it says
[00:01:59] that one
[00:02:01] asked: "O camel, from
[00:02:05] where do you come, O blessed one?" He said, "From the warm bath
[00:02:08] of your street." He said, "It is evident from your knee."
[00:02:12] The claims of the Americans
[00:02:15] do not correspond
[00:02:17] to what we are witnessing on the ground.
[00:02:21] They can continue to say
[00:02:25] that the Strait of Hormuz no longer has
[00:02:27] any effect.
[00:02:30] Iran has lost its leverage. We
[00:02:34] will do our job. I don't think
[00:02:37] the markets are going to pay much attention to such
[00:02:41] claims. The market has
[00:02:44] its own rules and laws. And the events that are happening
[00:02:47] internationally, the fact that they resort
[00:02:50] to other countries to supply their fuel, speaks volumes.
[00:02:54] But let me clarify that the incident
[00:02:58] that happened in the Strait of Hormuz
[00:03:01] was not for leverage.
[00:03:04] What we witnessed in the Strait of Hormuz since
[00:03:08] March 9th was
[00:03:12] the direct result of the actions of America and the Zionist regime in attacking
[00:03:15] Iran. They exploited this waterway,
[00:03:18] where Iran
[00:03:20] has the longest coastline, to attack
[00:03:24] Iran. And in these circumstances, based on the provisions of international
[00:03:28] law, we have taken a set of measures.
[00:03:32] As long as America insists
[00:03:35] on continuing to destabilize this waterway
[00:03:38] and region through naval blockade,
[00:03:41] economic warfare, all those things they
[00:03:45] pride themselves on, and all of which constitute military aggression
[00:03:49] against a country, well,
[00:03:52] security will not return to this waterway
[00:03:55] at all. We are not happy with this situation because
[00:03:58] the security of the Strait of Hormuz
[00:04:01] is necessary for us
[00:04:05] more than anyone else. But what can we do when America, with this aggressive
[00:04:08] action, has
[00:04:11] caused trouble
[00:04:14] for the region, for itself, and
[00:04:18] for the world? This fact, this reality, must be
[00:04:21] constantly kept
[00:04:23] alive
[00:04:26] before the world so that they know the factor and
[00:04:39] Dr., we witnessed the Iranian Cultural Week in
[00:04:43] Russia, which has concluded. Given
[00:04:46] the recent developments in Tehran-Moscow relations,
[00:04:49] what role can the Iranian Cultural Week in Russia play
[00:04:53] in strengthening the interactions between the two countries?
[00:04:57] Thank you.
[00:05:00] Cultural cooperation between Iran and
[00:05:02] Russia is itself a sign
[00:05:05] of the depth and
[00:05:09] breadth of good relations between the two countries. And
[00:05:12] it can reciprocally pave the way
[00:05:16] for strengthening relations in all areas, in political,
[00:05:19] economic, and commercial fields.
[00:05:23] Well, this week
[00:05:25] I mean, the Iranian Cultural Week
[00:05:29] in Russia was one of the most magnificent cultural events
[00:05:33] we have had in recent years. It was held in four
[00:05:36] cities of Russia, and if you remember,
[00:05:39] before that,
[00:05:42] we had the Russian Cultural Week in Iran.
[00:05:45] I would like to thank
[00:05:49] both the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, the Organization of Culture
[00:05:52] and Communications, and my colleagues who, with a very good
[00:05:56] planning, succeeded
[00:05:58] in presenting
[00:06:00] a part of
[00:06:03] Iran's cultural assets to the Russian
[00:06:06] audience.
[00:06:09] From the host.
[00:06:36] What is the position of the Islamic Republic regarding Mr. Putin's declaration of readiness
[00:06:39] to supply oil and oil products
[00:06:43] for the world markets and especially the American market?
[00:06:46] Thank you. You were coordinated.
[00:06:49] بودید
[00:06:52] Let me tell you that, well,
[00:06:56] every country can make decisions
[00:06:58] in line with its own interests and benefits.
[00:07:02] It is natural that we,
[00:07:06] as the Islamic Republic of Iran, make decisions
[00:07:10] on every issue based on our
[00:07:13] own priorities and interests. In this regard, it is
[00:07:17] an issue between Russia
[00:07:20] and America.
[00:07:23] But apart from the discussions on relations,
[00:07:26] it is interesting to me
[00:07:29] that in the context, in fact, in response to a question
[00:07:33] from another friend about the Strait of Hormuz,
[00:07:37] well, that itself is meaningful.
[00:07:39] If there was no problem and the problem had been solved, how
[00:07:43] should the American side reach out
[00:07:46] to the Russian side to solve
[00:07:49] some of its problems?
[00:07:52] Fars:
[00:07:55] فارس
[00:07:58] Hello, Mr. Bakaii, good day. Mr. Bakaii,
[00:08:01] Mr. Araqchi recently stated that we are reviewing America's views
[00:08:05] on Iran's seven-day plan, and we will soon,
[00:08:08] in the coming days, provide an answer. Mr. Mohsen Rezaei, the Secretary of the Council,
[00:08:17] stated that the Americans' response is not really acceptable to us and is not enough. I want to know if Iran has indeed
[00:08:21] provided its response, after receiving the Americans' response,
[00:08:25] to the mediators, and if so, can you please
[00:08:28] elaborate on the details of the American response, what topics it covered?
[00:08:32] Thank you.
[00:08:34] متشکرم
[00:08:39] I can tell you that the exchange
[00:08:42] of messages through mediators
[00:08:46] between Iran and America continues.
[00:08:49] What was brought up on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly meeting
[00:08:53] was referred to as Iran's seven-day plan.
[00:08:57] It was a demand for Iran's legitimate
[00:09:00] rights, and much has been said about it.
[00:09:04] These seven points
[00:09:06] include
[00:09:10] lifting the naval blockade,
[00:09:12] stopping the war on all fronts, and releasing
[00:09:16] Iran's assets. In short,
[00:09:19] if I want to tell you the summary, everything that we had agreed upon
[00:09:23] in the framework of the memorandum of understanding, well, these are issues
[00:09:26] that will be brought up as Iran's rights
[00:09:30] in any negotiation.
[00:09:33] The situation has not changed for us to want
[00:09:37] to show flexibility regarding our
[00:09:40] rights. In addition,
[00:09:48] all these sanctions should logically be lifted.
[00:09:51] The American side has also previously
[00:09:54] stated its demands. Their claim
[00:09:57] is that their main concern is still Iran's nuclear issue.
[00:10:01] Well, let's skip the big contradiction
[00:10:04] that has been created, because they have
[00:10:08] announced several times that they have destroyed Iran's entire nuclear program,
[00:10:11] but still
[00:10:14] raise the phantom threat of Iran's nuclear weapon. They have raised
[00:10:18] their concerns in this regard.
[00:10:20] This point that has been raised that it was not insufficient
[00:10:24] or that we have announced our positions, well, this
[00:10:28] is a correct point.
[00:10:30] Our position is that
[00:10:32] in the current situation,
[00:10:36] we must consider priorities.
[00:10:40] Ending America's interventionist
[00:10:44] and aggressive actions is not something new.
[00:10:47] We have said it before. The American parties have also been informed
[00:10:50] through mediators. We also stated it quickly. But anyway, regarding
[00:10:56] the points they raised, we
[00:10:59] are reviewing them, and as soon as our review is complete,
[00:11:03] we will convey it to the mediators.
[00:11:05] Hello, Mr. Bagha, good day.
[00:11:09] Mr. Bagha, yesterday evening, Mr. Araqchi
[00:11:12] and the Saudi Foreign Minister had a telephone conversation. This telephone conversation took place
[00:11:16] while we see how the situation in Yemen
[00:11:19] is and what is happening.
[00:11:23] I wanted to talk about this telephone conversation,
[00:11:27] what its content and details
[00:11:30] were, and that
[00:11:33] this morning a report was also published by the Wall Street Journal
[00:11:37] stating that the Saudi Crown Prince emphasized that diplomatic channels
[00:11:41] with Iran should be maintained, but he welcomes
[00:11:44] increasing economic pressure on Iran
[00:11:48] and has emphasized this issue. I wanted you to talk about this as well. Thank you.
[00:11:52] Well, it is natural that the media have their own analyses
[00:11:55] and claims.
[00:11:58] But regarding the
[00:12:01] talks that took place last night, yes,
[00:12:04] consultations between Iran and the countries of the region
[00:12:08] are an ongoing
[00:12:11] matter. We
[00:12:14] are severely concerned about the events that are happening
[00:12:18] in the Arabian Peninsula. We have repeatedly
[00:12:22] announced our readiness to
[00:12:26] use our good offices to help
[00:12:29] facilitate dialogue between the parties. We believe
[00:12:33] that the continuation and escalation of tensions
[00:12:37] will only benefit
[00:12:39] the Zionist regime
[00:12:42] in the region. For this reason,
[00:12:44] we do not at all approve of
[00:12:48] the continuation
[00:12:49] of fire
[00:12:53] and war between two Islamic countries. Our region is already
[00:12:57] facing tensions due to the actions of the US and the Zionist regime.
[00:13:01] At the same time, we have always expressed our position
[00:13:05] that the people of Yemen
[00:13:08] have the right to live a dignified
[00:13:11] life, free from
[00:13:13] pressure, sanctions, and blockade. What we have witnessed
[00:13:17] in the past 10-12 years is
[00:13:21] something that is not
[00:13:26] justifiable from an Islamic
[00:13:29] point of view, nor from the perspective of international law.
[00:13:33] In any case, in yesterday's conversation,
[00:13:36] we also announced our readiness to help
[00:13:39] resolve the issue through
[00:13:43] dialogue.
[00:13:46] Quds: Dr., first of all, I thank you for the precious gift you gave,
[00:13:50] the valuable divan of Lisan
[00:13:54] al-Ghaib, Hazrat Hafez. Thank you. My question is a continuation of my colleague's question.
[00:13:57] In the events that occurred in recent days,
[00:14:00] we witnessed the publication of horrific
[00:14:04] and genocidal scenes in Yemen.
[00:14:08] I would like to know your opinion on this matter
[00:14:11] and the legal and international responsibility
[00:14:14] that these events create
[00:14:17] and are prosecutable.
[00:14:20] I think
[00:14:23] I have already answered.
[00:14:35] was done, they would solve it. You know that a roadmap had been agreed
[00:14:39] upon between Yemen and Saudi Arabia, and we
[00:14:42] had
[00:14:45] also emphasized that we support the implementation
[00:14:48] of whatever you yourselves have agreed upon.
[00:14:50] Well, that did not happen, if you remember. It happened
[00:14:59] at Sanaa airport, and at that time,
[00:15:01] we also expressed deep concern that this incident might
[00:15:05] escalate the situation, and now we
[00:15:08] are witnessing that, unfortunately, this situation
[00:15:11] has occurred.
[00:15:14] Our request
[00:15:18] is that
[00:15:20] this situation
[00:15:24] really be resolved
[00:15:28] through dialogue
[00:15:31] and interaction. As I said, such a situation
[00:15:35] is definitely not
[00:15:39] for the good and well-being of the Islamic
[00:15:42] Ummah and our region.
[00:15:44] Tasnim:
[00:15:47] Hello and respect to you, Dr. After
[00:15:50] the consultations between the presidents of Iran and Russia in Turkmenistan,
[00:15:54] we witnessed a phone call between Mr. Putin and Trump, and it was said that
[00:15:58] Iran's positions on resolving tensions between Iran
[00:16:01] and the US were conveyed to the US President.
[00:16:05] Also, news has been published about Russia's willingness
[00:16:08] to mediate between
[00:16:12] Iran and the US. Did Russia present a specific plan in its meeting with
[00:16:15] Mr. Pezeshkian and Mr. Putin? And
[00:16:19] did Mr. Putin convey a message to Iran after his phone call
[00:16:22] and consultations with Trump?
[00:16:25] Thank you. Our consultations with Russia
[00:16:28] on various issues, including the nuclear issue,
[00:16:32] are not new. Russia played a very
[00:16:35] positive and effective role in
[00:16:38] the 2015 nuclear agreement and
[00:16:42] still maintains its interest
[00:16:45] in resolving the issue.
[00:16:49] The
[00:16:52] relationship based on mutual trust
[00:16:55] is also one
[00:16:57] of the
[00:16:59] assets that exist between the two countries, and
[00:17:02] we certainly, both sides, are determined
[00:17:06] to maintain this good relationship.
[00:17:09] In the conversation
[00:17:11] that took place between the two presidents
[00:17:15] on the sidelines of the summit
[00:17:18] in Avaza, Turkmenistan,
[00:17:22] our country's president expressed our positions,
[00:17:25] and once
[00:17:27] again,
[00:17:30] he elaborated on Iran's seven-day plan and
[00:17:33] also on the considerations and points that exist
[00:17:37] regarding the overall issue. Given
[00:17:40] that the Russian President
[00:17:43] was apparently going to have a phone call
[00:17:47] with his American counterpart, well, this conversation took place before that.
[00:17:51] But this expression of positions by his American counterpart
[00:17:54] was also made. Well, this conversation took place before that.
[00:17:57] But this expression of positions, hectare by Afghanistan,
[00:18:01] was raised by one of the members of parliament.
[00:18:04] Given that we also have challenges
[00:18:08] with Afghanistan regarding water issues,
[00:18:12] and discussions have been held, I would like to know if the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was aware of these consultations
[00:18:15] and what the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' position is on this plan.
[00:18:19] I think they explained it themselves.
[00:18:22] This was truly
[00:18:26] a clear misunderstanding
[00:18:30] that arose
[00:18:33] from
[00:18:35] the statements
[00:18:39] of one of the honorable members
[00:18:42] of parliament, which is to provide facilities to landlocked countries
[00:18:46] that do not have access to open waters,
[00:18:49] in the form of leases,
[00:18:52] in order to both help
[00:18:55] promote trade between
[00:18:58] the two countries and,
[00:19:02] within the framework of good neighborliness, help those countries
[00:19:04] to have
[00:19:07] access to
[00:19:10] ports and open waters
[00:19:13] for the purpose of carrying out their commercial transactions. This is actually
[00:19:17] one
[00:19:20] of the positive initiatives. And
[00:19:23] regarding Afghanistan, of course,
[00:19:26] this issue has not been officially raised. It was raised
[00:19:30] on the sidelines of a formal meeting that one of the ministers had
[00:19:34] with Afghanistan. And we also said
[00:19:37] that we will review it, but I emphasize
[00:19:41] that those discussions and arguments
[00:19:44] about ceding land and so on have no
[00:19:48] basis at all.
[00:19:50] The policy
[00:19:53] of the day. Greetings. Hello, good time.
[00:19:57] Regarding the fact that the UN Secretary-General, while on the anniversary of October 7th,
[00:20:00] refrained from condemning the destruction and genocide in Gaza,
[00:20:04] and also did not condemn the attacks on Iranian infrastructure
[00:20:08] and civilians during the Ramadan War, he recently condemned
[00:20:11] the attack on the Saudi airport and considered
[00:20:15] the attack on civilians and civilian infrastructure a violation
[00:20:19] of international law.
[00:20:23] I wanted to ask about the diplomatic apparatus's reaction
[00:20:26] to this double standard. We also saw this
[00:20:29] in the European countries, meaning we also saw
[00:20:33] this double standard in European countries
[00:20:36] while Donald Trump keeps talking
[00:20:40] about destroying, according to his claims, destroying Iran's
[00:20:43] infrastructure, but sometimes we
[00:20:46] see that when Riyadh airport is targeted,
[00:20:50] European countries remain silent regarding Trump's claims,
[00:20:53] but they react
[00:20:57] to these attacks. I wanted to know the diplomatic
[00:21:00] apparatus's reaction. Well, my reaction is regret,
[00:21:03] isn't it? This is not the first time
[00:21:06] we are witnessing double
[00:21:09] standards regarding international
[00:21:12] issues, especially in
[00:21:16] relation to issues related to human rights violations
[00:21:19] and human rights violations.
[00:21:22] The fact that international officials,
[00:21:26] especially the Secretary-General of the United Nations
[00:21:29] or senior officials of other international institutions
[00:21:33] who believe that the least they have
[00:21:37] is a voice, and they
[00:21:40] use this voice selectively,
[00:21:43] well, it is regrettable.
[00:21:46] But its consequences will affect
[00:21:50] everyone. If you act in a one-sided
[00:21:53] and selective manner
[00:21:57] regarding lawlessness and
[00:21:59] violations of international law, you are simply encouraging
[00:22:03] lawlessness, just as
[00:22:06] the situation we faced in Gaza over the past three years,
[00:22:10] an obvious genocide, was unfortunately ignored
[00:22:12] by European parties and the United Nations.
[00:22:16] The result has been
[00:22:20] the spread of war-mongering in the world, and now we see
[00:22:23] that even those who have a hand
[00:22:26] in the fire from a distance are not warmed by this fire,
[00:22:30] this fire is burning their hands.
[00:22:57] Why does Nature magazine say the Australian fires
[00:23:01] are the fault of the British? A
[00:23:03] multi-year case that after the failure of police forces
[00:23:07] was handed over to different detectives. University professors
[00:23:10] at Melbourne asked why the fire alarm
[00:23:14] rings so often in Australian forests.
[00:23:17] Especially in the southeast.
[00:23:41] Using a special tube, they extracted a cylinder
[00:23:45] of mud from the lakebed, which helped them to
[00:23:48] examine the crime scene in a few.
[00:24:06] The same very tiny seeds that are responsible for fertilizing
[00:24:10] plants, and of course, are allergy triggers for some
[00:24:13] of us. But what you might not know is the extremely
[00:24:17] hard shell of these pollen grains. Unlike vulnerable
[00:24:20] plants, pollen grains have a shell that neither decomposes easily
[00:24:23] nor dissolves easily, and can remain
[00:24:27] for thousands of years. Pollen grains are carried
[00:24:30] by wind and water currents. Therefore, an abundance
[00:24:34] of pollen from plants from far and
[00:24:38] near can be found in a sedimentary layer.
[00:24:40] In short, examining a sedimentary layer of lake mud and
[00:24:44] identifying the types and abundance of pollen
[00:24:48] provides us with a rough picture of the vegetation cover of the region
[00:24:52] during a specific historical period. Researchers at the University
[00:24:56] of Melbourne used this method to reconstruct a thousand-year
[00:24:59] historical period of vegetation cover in southeastern Australia.
[00:25:03] But their work was not just about mapping
[00:25:07] vegetation. They also wanted to find
[00:25:10] the pattern of fires. So, they selected
[00:25:13] 19 samples of charcoal remaining
[00:25:16] in sediments to determine the quality of the fuel.
[00:25:20] The
[00:25:24] result was this: during an 800-year
[00:25:28] period, most fires resulted from the burning of grassy plants and a small
[00:25:31] amount of woody material. Whereas, from the mid-19th
[00:25:35] century, the pattern changed. Charcoal samples show
[00:25:38] that fires from this period onwards were mostly caused
[00:25:42] by the burning of shrubs and eucalyptus trees.
[00:25:45] What change occurred? University of Melbourne researchers
[00:25:49] realized that Australia's vegetation,
[00:25:52] which until then was mostly grasslands, had changed
[00:25:55] and become dense forests. So, if a fire
[00:25:59] occurred, it was more destructive because of the combustible materials.
[00:26:21] The arrival of the British. Before the British government sent
[00:26:24] Captain James Cook to explore eastern Australia
[00:26:28] and establish its colonial rule there,
[00:26:32] the people of this region managed the forests
[00:26:35] in a different way. They would set small,
[00:26:39] controlled fires at different times
[00:26:42] to manage both the diversity and density of vegetation
[00:26:46] and to prevent uncontrollable
[00:26:50] blazes. But when
[00:26:53] the British arrived, the practice changed. On the one hand,
[00:26:57] they cut down trees in some places to create
[00:27:00] suitable land for agriculture. And on the other hand,
[00:27:04] they abandoned some areas and did not allow
[00:27:07] the indigenous people to manage the forested areas
[00:27:10] in their own way. These forests entered a cycle
[00:27:14] of fire that continues to this day. So, after
[00:27:17] hotter fires, only species like eucalyptus sprout,
[00:27:21] which make the forests denser and also
[00:27:24] provide more combustible material for subsequent
[00:27:28] fires. This is a quote from the Nature article. Colonizers
[00:27:32] called Australia an ownerless land and, by
[00:27:36] justifying the confiscation of land, they devalued the inherent wisdom
[00:27:40] in indigenous knowledge.
[00:27:43] both changed Australia's vegetation and, by erasing
[00:27:47] indigenous culture, planted the seed of fire
[00:27:51] in this land.
[00:29:39] Good evening, esteemed viewers. Welcome to the 11 o'clock news. The academic year for universities
[00:29:43] began in a ceremony attended by the President. The President, in this ceremony,
[00:29:46] emphasizing unity and cohesion, called on everyone to act
[00:29:50] with skill and determination to solve the country's problems.
[00:29:53] Mr. Pezeshkian also spoke about quasi-governmental and loss-making companies,
[00:29:57] saying that these companies, despite having thousands
[00:30:00] of billions in capital,
[00:30:03] are losing money and, at the same time, their management receives hundreds
[00:30:06] of billions. The President continued by stating
[00:30:10] that the transportation of gasoline costs more than its current selling price.