IRINN — broadcast
20261012 190000 UTC
454 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] he faces a calm atmosphere in both the House of Representatives and the
[00:00:03] Senate, and he needs a calm atmosphere to be able
[00:00:07] to pass. Israel needs a tense atmosphere.
[00:00:11] It needs an increase in tension. This has created a contradiction
[00:00:14] in this space, just as you see a major
[00:00:18] contradiction today in the behavior of Americans and Europeans regarding
[00:00:22] Ukraine. On the one hand, Americans are trying to lower the
[00:00:26] flames in Ukraine, and on the other hand, just today, they
[00:00:31] announced 300 new sanctions against Russia. This shows
[00:00:34] how much distance there is between positions and
[00:00:38] how much tension and trouble there is. What is this due
[00:00:41] to? It is due to the defeat of the Westerners
[00:00:45] in the Ukraine case. They were defeated and could not
[00:00:48] do anything for Ukraine, and also in the case of the
[00:00:52] Iran war. These defeats have caused them
[00:00:56] to be in disarray and engaged, and
[00:01:00] all of them have become weaker and are moving towards
[00:01:03] more weakness, and the world is concerned about another incident.
[00:01:07] It is now said that the situation in Bab al-Mandab is merely a sanction
[00:01:10] on the movement of Saudi vessels. Bab al-Mandab, unlike the Strait
[00:01:14] of Hormuz, is not closed. Traffic is happening, but now, for
[00:01:17] Saudi Arabia, the concern is that today, in the news and media
[00:01:21] and analyses, it is said that if the Americans commit
[00:01:25] another attack on Iran, the first
[00:01:28] action will be that Bab al-Mandab will also suffer the fate of the Strait
[00:01:32] of Hormuz. Then, this energy situation, where the price of
[00:01:36] oil has increased somewhat today, will go up exponentially,
[00:01:40] and the world will truly not be able to tolerate
[00:01:43] this situation. This is absolutely correct. That is, this concern
[00:01:46] is a significant and valid concern.
[00:01:50] The Yemeni resistance has shown
[00:01:53] that it will not remain
[00:01:57] silent in the face of war against its ally, whether
[00:02:00] this war is in Gaza, or in Lebanon, or in Iran.
[00:02:04] And
[00:02:06] the Americans know that the Iranians,
[00:02:10] in order to win a war, if it were
[00:02:13] to start, would use all their capacity this time,
[00:02:16] both in terms of weaponry
[00:02:20] and in terms of strategic decisions, like what Mr.
[00:02:24] Rezaei said in his interview about fiber and these
[00:02:28] facilities related to artificial intelligence and the internet,
[00:02:31] which he brought up, which terrified
[00:02:34] the Westerners, both in terms of using the geography
[00:02:38] and geographical points of Iran. It uses all of these
[00:02:42] to be able to end the war in the shortest possible time and with
[00:02:46] absolute victory, and with the acceptance of its victory
[00:02:49] by the Americans and others,
[00:02:53] and to end the war in the region forever.
[00:02:56] And now, how do you analyze the situation of the
[00:03:00] Strait of Hormuz, Mr. Zaree?
[00:03:03] Especially these clashes of the past few days and these super
[00:03:06] vessels that were targeted, how much has it been able
[00:03:10] to change the situation in the Strait of Hormuz? What is the situation now
[00:03:13] in the Strait of Hormuz? The Strait of Hormuz has become a great
[00:03:17] experience that when the Americans
[00:03:21] play a foolish game and try,
[00:03:25] as Sardar Rezaei put it, through smuggling,
[00:03:29] to break Iran's authority in the Strait
[00:03:32] of Hormuz and be able
[00:03:36] to save the oil market to some extent,
[00:03:39] Iran takes the initiative here.
[00:03:43] For a while, Iran
[00:03:46] did not really care about Emirati and Saudi
[00:03:49] tankers. It didn't
[00:03:52] create many restrictions for them,
[00:03:55] for reasons that were also justified.
[00:03:58] But when it saw that they were
[00:04:02] abusing this patience, Iran
[00:04:06] started attacking Emirati oil
[00:04:09] tankers two days ago, and the Saudis
[00:04:13] will not be left out. Within two
[00:04:17] days, three Emirati-Saudi supertankers
[00:04:19] were hit around the Strait of Hormuz.
[00:04:23] The hits are reaching the Ras al-Khaimah
[00:04:27] and Fujairah areas, meaning
[00:04:30] in the Gulf of Oman, near the Arabian Sea.
[00:04:33] On this side, in the Persian Gulf,
[00:04:37] hits are occurring. After periods
[00:04:40] when there were no incidents here,
[00:04:43] ships have been facing mine hits
[00:04:47] for the past few days. This shows
[00:04:50] that the tables have turned, and
[00:04:54] Iran's patience has run out, and Iran
[00:04:57] has gradually started an escalating
[00:05:00] pressure against Americans and
[00:05:04] America's agents. These escalations
[00:05:07] are the result of American foolishness,
[00:05:10] just as the escalation of the war
[00:05:12] in Yemen
[00:05:15] I'm sorry, is the product of Saudi
[00:05:19] foolishness. Otherwise, Saudi Arabia and Yemenis
[00:05:23] had no desire to escalate, and Iran had no desire
[00:05:26] to escalate. When they act foolishly,
[00:05:30] it backfires on them, and the more
[00:05:33] they resist Iran's rightful demands,
[00:05:37] the more difficult
[00:05:39] it will become. The
[00:06:05] letter, of course, explicitly mentions the cessation of the Gaza war and the cessation
[00:06:08] of the Yemen war. Previously, it was mentioned generally.
[00:06:12] Now it has been explicitly stated, and the nuclear
[00:06:15] issue has been removed from the file.
[00:06:18] Iran's letter has some specificities,
[00:06:22] but the main part is the Islamabad Memorandum. So, what was
[00:06:25] the Americans' answer? They gave a rude answer
[00:06:29] to Iran's letter. Well, when they give
[00:06:33] a rude answer, Iran
[00:06:35] is not waiting for this issue. Iran is not weak.
[00:06:39] The day Iran accepted America's request
[00:06:42] for a ceasefire on April 8th, it was
[00:06:46] not in a position of weakness. Well, the sign of this
[00:06:49] is that Iran did not request a ceasefire, and
[00:06:52] in fact, in the last days, the
[00:06:56] pressure of Iran on American military forces has
[00:07:00] increased. So, we were not in a position of weakness. Very
[00:07:04] well, now we wanted the war to end. The Americans
[00:07:07] played dirty, and it will be to their detriment because
[00:07:11] we have levers of power. and we
[00:07:14] can gradually
[00:07:16] increase our pressures in various
[00:07:20] dimensions on America and America's agents, and
[00:07:23] force them
[00:07:26] in a weaker situation to
[00:07:30] accept our rights. Then, at that time,
[00:07:33] certainly, our demands will no longer be the demands
[00:07:37] of Islamabad. As Mr. Baghaei, the spokesman
[00:07:40] of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said, "Yes, we
[00:07:42] are negotiating, but we will not go back to square
[00:07:46] one. We will not go back." The more they delay,
[00:07:49] the harder it will become. The number of
[00:07:53] our demands will increase, just as it has increased now. Regarding
[00:07:57] Iran's announcement that, as you said, the Americans' response was rude, Iran announced
[00:08:01] that a sufficient response had not been given
[00:08:04] to the seven conditions. Do you know exactly
[00:08:08] what the points of difference are now? You see,
[00:08:10] the points of difference are much more
[00:08:14] than the points of agreement here.
[00:08:17] Well, Iran has demanded
[00:08:20] a ceasefire. The Americans have
[00:08:23] prevented a ceasefire and also the lifting
[00:08:27] of the siege, in terms of
[00:08:30] nuclear issues, we should agree to what they want,
[00:08:33] which is to return the issue to before the war, not even
[00:08:37] the Islamabad negotiations. That is,
[00:08:40] the gap has widened. The American
[00:08:42] response to Iran's letter has
[00:08:46] greatly widened the gap between us and America
[00:08:50] and between us and the agreement. Well, when this
[00:08:53] gap widens, what happens next? The military
[00:08:57] element comes into play, and now they will see who
[00:09:00] gets hurt the most here.
[00:09:03] And these
[00:09:07] days, there's a lot of talk about elections, the fifth of
[00:09:10] Aban, also elections.
[00:09:18] To increase tension in the region, especially attacks against
[00:09:21] Iran, how much do these elections and these
[00:09:25] two crucial dates determine, and do Americans really
[00:09:28] analyze and decide based on this, or not?
[00:09:32] This could be part of the story
[00:09:35] and analysis. From the behavior of the US government,
[00:09:38] we understand that the Americans have designed
[00:09:42] a combined operation for a period of approximately
[00:09:46] 9 months, which started in early
[00:09:49] September with that
[00:09:52] economic operation that Basant
[00:09:55] announced there. Since then,
[00:09:59] they started from early September, a
[00:10:02] 9-month period until the end
[00:10:05] of next May. They have in their
[00:10:07] plan that we must do two or three things:
[00:10:11] one, increase economic pressure.
[00:10:14] Two, we must wait
[00:10:17] for these economic pressures to affect Iranian society
[00:10:21] and create social unrest.
[00:10:25] And three, that we can, through
[00:10:29] security measures,
[00:10:31] disrupt the internal situation of Iran, something they are
[00:10:35] currently doing in Pakistan with the leadership
[00:10:38] of the UAE. The Emiratis should know
[00:10:42] that we know that the UAE is
[00:10:45] leading the incitement in our border
[00:10:49] region in Sistan and Baluchestan, and in
[00:10:51] the intense events that occurred in this province
[00:10:55] these days, the assassinations that took place, and what they are
[00:10:58] doing in the Iraqi Kurdistan region.
[00:11:01] They are doing this to be able to bring
[00:11:05] security measures into Iranian cities,
[00:11:08] especially the capital, and then bring
[00:11:12] these economic pressures to the point of unrest,
[00:11:16] and finally, when these and
[00:11:19] also, they are looking at political differences
[00:11:23] among the bodies of the Islamic Republic, to create discord.
[00:11:26] The government's influence in society should decrease. These
[00:11:30] actions that some do in the name of revolutionary
[00:11:34] zeal to weaken the government are part of America's plan
[00:11:38] to weaken the authority of the government, including the government, within
[00:11:41] Iranian society. The political
[00:11:44] sector is also in disarray, and the social sector is engaged.
[00:11:48] On one hand, terrorist operations, on the other hand, street riots,
[00:11:52] and finally, a military strike will finish the job.
[00:11:55] This is what they have planned, but this
[00:11:58] is naive in our opinion. Why do we say it is naive?
[00:12:01] One, with this warm presence of people in
[00:12:04] the streets, the possibility of street riots
[00:12:08] has almost approached zero, and the continuation of this
[00:12:12] presence shows that the atmosphere indicates that this
[00:12:15] will continue. The people will not give up and understand
[00:12:19] their role in this scene. On the other
[00:12:22] hand, these armed counter-revolutionary groups, whether
[00:12:26] in the southeastern region or in the northwest,
[00:12:29] are under heavy attack
[00:12:33] from our armed forces and our security forces every day.
[00:12:36] We will not allow them to make any significant
[00:12:40] inroads, and also, for that plan
[00:12:43] that Basant said about continuing economic pressure progressively,
[00:12:47] we have a plan, just as in the past
[00:12:51] 10 days, Basant also gave
[00:12:53] an ultimatum. We witnessed
[00:12:57] more calm in the economic sphere. That period
[00:13:00] is over, its time is up, and
[00:13:04] the Islamic Republic truly has an economic design
[00:13:08] to prevent what they have in mind from happening,
[00:13:11] and that the Americans thought that with four
[00:13:15] diplomatic trips and four statements,
[00:13:18] they could bring the land, air, and
[00:13:22] sea blockade of Iran to a point where Iran would be locked down.
[00:13:26] This is absolutely not possible. Our north is open
[00:13:29] to Iran. Just a few days ago, the President traveled
[00:13:33] and met with officials there. We have warm relations with Iraq.
[00:13:36] We have relations with Turkey, with Pakistan,
[00:13:40] with Afghanistan. In the south, we still
[00:13:44] have traffic despite American pressure in Iraq.
[00:13:48] We have traffic, and this is not something they will succeed
[00:13:51] in. But you asked, and I explained that they have
[00:13:55] taken a combined approach in economic,
[00:13:57] military, political, security,
[00:14:01] and social fields,
[00:14:04] hoping to achieve something by May. Now,
[00:14:08] my question, we only have two minutes. My question was
[00:14:11] whether the elections
[00:14:14] are influential, meaning, for example, if Netanyahu's coalition
[00:14:17] loses in the Knesset elections, Netanyahu
[00:14:20] loses his political life altogether, or if the Republican
[00:14:24] Congress loses in the elections
[00:14:27] and Trump is even impeached, meaning things that are predicted
[00:14:31] might happen, are these really influential in the
[00:14:35] war? If the war, for example, is to happen after the elections,
[00:14:39] or if, as they say, for a surprise,
[00:14:42] it might happen before, specifically, the election date,
[00:14:46] I want to know how much it can actually be a basis for analysis.
[00:14:50] In my opinion, almost nothing. It has no effect
[00:14:53] on our situation or America's.
[00:14:57] Why? Because winning this war
[00:15:00] is vital for the Americans, for the Westerners, for the Zionist
[00:15:03] regime, for our southern Gulf
[00:15:07] countries. It is a vital issue.
[00:15:10] That is, it doesn't matter if it's Democrats or Republicans.
[00:15:13] It doesn't matter if it's the
[00:15:16] Likud party or another party there.
[00:15:20] Whether it's Netanyahu or Eisenkot,
[00:15:24] winning the war against Iran is vital for all of them. And therefore,
[00:15:28] as long as they can, whether it's Trump or
[00:15:31] someone else, whether it's Netanyahu or Eisenkot,
[00:15:34] the fact that they are motivated
[00:15:38] to resist defeat from Iran will continue.
[00:15:42] However, with God's help, the further they go,
[00:15:45] the more disorganized their situation becomes, and their desperation
[00:15:49] increases, just as right now, compared to two months ago, they are very
[00:15:52] desperate. This steadfastness of the Iranian
[00:15:56] nation will destroy their cohesion, and ultimately,
[00:15:59] all of them will be forced to accept what they don't want
[00:16:03] easily in a difficult situation.
[00:16:07] I hope
[00:16:17] you found tonight's analysis useful. Good night and goodbye.
[00:16:55] If you are a woman, you can with all your strength and
[00:16:58] feminine power move the world in a direction where
[00:17:02] you are both a mother and a lover of your
[00:17:05] homeland. You just need to swear
[00:17:09] to God's greatness so that he grants
[00:17:12] you the success of selfless service in every fiber
[00:17:16] of your being. Yes, sometimes you are chosen
[00:17:19] to be a hero, to shine like
[00:17:22] a light across this world,
[00:17:26] and to be the solace of needy children.
[00:17:29] Martyr Eftekhar, what covenant
[00:17:32] did you make with your God that you continued your
[00:17:36] mission of motherhood with such immense love
[00:17:39] and courage to the heavens?
[00:17:42] Let me continue with the moments
[00:17:45] when we were getting closer to the heavens, step
[00:17:49] by step, welcomed by angels.
[00:17:51] That was the moment when you were close
[00:17:53] to the people in public gatherings,
[00:17:57] when you were with the people. The moment
[00:18:01] you embraced the children of this land
[00:18:04] tightly in your motherly arms.
[00:18:07] The moment you sacrificed yourself so that a needy
[00:18:11] child would not cry, and
[00:18:14] those moments when you were a listening
[00:18:17] ear to the pains of your fellow
[00:18:20] citizens, and finally, in the position
[00:18:24] of Cultural and Social Deputy of the
[00:18:27] Provincial Police Command of Sistan and Baluchestan,
[00:18:31] you earned the seal and signature of martyrdom.
[00:18:34] کردیم.
[00:19:07] The absence of a father should not hinder their education,
[00:19:11] showing that you no longer belong
[00:19:14] to this earth, and how beautiful it
[00:19:17] is to return to your God's embrace
[00:19:21] by the hands of the worst and lowest.
[00:19:24] She was someone
[00:19:28] who was with the people. She was of the people. Her concerns
[00:19:32] were cultural and social issues and attention to
[00:19:35] colleagues and people.
[00:20:17] She dedicated her entire life to efforts and revitalization of social activities
[00:20:20] and communication between tribes and people,
[00:20:24] social participation, and public education.
[00:20:27] And today, we are proud to see the name of this
[00:20:31] doctor, who was indeed a leader in terms
[00:20:34] of knowledge
[00:20:36] and beliefs and thoughts for all of us,
[00:20:40] and was well-known, on the
[00:20:43] forehead of the police organization, and
[00:20:46] we hope to be able to continue her path.
[00:20:50] Fridays are always the promise of true
[00:20:53] lovers, and you beautifully fulfilled
[00:20:57] the divine promise to embark on an eternal journey
[00:21:01] as the guest of the Master of Martyrs, Imam
[00:21:05] Hussein (peace be upon him),
[00:21:07] to remain forever
[00:21:11] in our hearts.
[00:21:14] و قلب
[00:21:16] Congratulations
[00:21:42] on your martyrdom, O glorious woman
[00:21:45] of Iran.
[00:21:47] ایران.
[00:23:32] It's not like uh Hamas attacked on
[00:23:35] October 7th because there were just a bunch of anti-semites who
[00:23:39] hated Jews and wanted to kill Jews. This is not
[00:23:43] Nazi Germany, right? This is directly related
[00:23:46] to the occupation and to what was going on in. side of
[00:23:50] Gaza, and it's not in Israel's interest or the lobby's
[00:23:54] interest to have an open discourse about what the
[00:23:57] Israelis have been doing to the Palestinians, since I
[00:24:00] would say roughly 1903 when the second
[00:24:03] Aliah came to Israel or came to what was
[00:24:06] then Palestine, right? we want to talk
[00:24:09] about that, and we don't want to talk about from the lobby's point
[00:24:13] of view, the influence that the lobby has,
[00:24:16] right? it's better from the lobby's point of view. if most
[00:24:20] americans think that uh American support of
[00:24:24] Israel is just done for all the right moral and strategic
[00:24:27] reasons, not because of the lobby, and when John Mirschermer and Steve Walt
[00:24:31] come along and say you have to understand that this special
[00:24:34] relationship is due in large part to the lobby's
[00:24:38] influence, that is not an argument that people
[00:24:42] in the lobby want to hear, people in the lobby understand that if you have an open
[00:24:45] discourse Israel will end up looking very bad,
[00:24:49] right? you don't want to... about the occupation, you don't want to talk
[00:24:52] about how Israel was created, right? i think the
[00:24:55] israelis are doing in
[00:24:58] gaza represents massacre, i would
[00:25:02] use that term, given the number of civilians that they've killed,
[00:25:06] and the fact that they've been indiscriminate in terms of how they've been
[00:25:10] bombing gaza, and i believe that's to be condemned, the
[00:25:14] killing of civilians,
[00:25:16] this is not legitimate collateral damage, they're direct.
[00:25:37] Why does Nature magazine say the Australian fires are the work of the British?
[00:25:40] A multi-year case that was handed over to different
[00:25:44] detectives after the police failed. Melbourne
[00:25:47] University professors. The question was why. Why does the fire
[00:25:51] alarm go off so often in the Australian forests, especially in the southeast
[00:25:54] of the country, like the Black Summer fires six years ago
[00:25:58] that turned 8 million hectares of forest into ash?
[00:26:02] New detectives found no
[00:26:05] clues from the ashes of the crime scene, but they guessed
[00:26:09] that to find the culprit's footprint, they would have to go
[00:26:12] back further.
[00:26:15] They pulled
[00:26:17] a cylinder of mud from the bed
[00:26:20] of a lake with a special tube that helped
[00:26:24] reconstruct the crime scene several hundred years ago
[00:26:27] with a distinct method,
[00:26:31] a method called science.
[00:26:36] You have certainly heard about plant fossils and
[00:26:40] you know what pollens are and what they do. Those very
[00:26:43] tiny grains that are responsible for fertilizing plants
[00:26:46] and are, of course, an allergen for some
[00:26:50] of us. But what you might not know is the extremely
[00:26:54] tough shell of these pollens. Unlike vulnerable plants,
[00:26:58] pollens have a shell that neither decays easily nor dissolves
[00:27:01] easily and can remain intact for
[00:27:05] thousands of years. Pollens are moved by wind and water
[00:27:09] currents. So, on a sedimentary layer of pollen, a large number
[00:27:12] of plants from far and near are found.
[00:27:15] In short, examining a sedimentary
[00:27:19] layer of lake mud and identifying the types
[00:27:22] and abundance of pollen gives us an approximate
[00:27:26] picture of the vegetation cover of the region during
[00:27:30] a specific historical period.
[00:27:32] Researchers at the University of Melbourne used this method to reconstruct
[00:27:36] a thousand-year historical period of vegetation
[00:27:40] in southeastern Australia, but their work was not just
[00:27:43] about mapping vegetation. They also wanted
[00:27:47] to find the pattern of fires. So,
[00:27:50] they also selected 19 samples of charcoal
[00:27:54] remaining in the sediments to determine the quality
[00:27:57] of the fuel materials.
[00:28:00] The result was that during an 800-year period, most fires
[00:28:04] resulted from the burning of herbaceous plants and a small amount
[00:28:08] of woody material, whereas from the mid-19th
[00:28:11] century, the pattern changed. Charcoal samples show
[00:28:15] that fires from this period onwards were mostly caused
[00:28:19] by the burning of shrubs and eucalyptus trees.
[00:28:22] What change occurred? Researchers at the University of Melbourne
[00:28:25] realized that Australia's vegetation, which until
[00:28:28] then was mostly grassland, had changed and had become
[00:28:32] dense forests. So if a fire occurred,
[00:28:35] it would be more destructive because the flammable
[00:28:39] materials were more abundant and denser. But
[00:28:42] had the cause of the fire also changed in these two time
[00:28:46] periods? This is where
[00:28:49] historical books came to the rescue. A major change
[00:28:53] in the 65,000-year life trajectory
[00:28:57] of Australia's indigenous people:
[00:29:00] the arrival of the British. Before the British government sent
[00:29:04] Captain James Cook to explore eastern Australia and establish
[00:29:07] its colonial government there, the people of this
[00:29:10] region managed the forests
[00:29:13] in a different way. They started
[00:29:16] small, controlled fires at different times
[00:29:20] to manage both plant diversity and density
[00:29:24] and to prevent uncontrollable wildfires,
[00:29:27] but when the British came,
[00:29:31] the practice changed. On the one hand, in some places, they cut
[00:29:35] down trees to create suitable land for agriculture,
[00:29:38] and on the other hand, they abandoned some areas
[00:29:42] and did not allow the indigenous people to manage
[00:29:46] the forest areas in their own way. Since then,
[00:29:49] these forests have entered a cycle of fire that continues
[00:29:52] to this day. After the hotter fires, only species
[00:29:56] like eucalyptus sprout, which make the forests denser
[00:29:59] and also provide more
[00:30:02] flammable material for subsequent fires. This
[00:30:06] is a sentence from the Nature article. The colonizers called
[00:30:10] Australia an ownerless land and, justifying
[00:30:13] the seizure of land, devalued the indigenous knowledge
[00:30:17] contained within it. In short, the British both changed
[00:30:21] Australia's vegetation and, by
[00:30:24] eradicating the indigenous culture,
[00:30:27] sowed the seeds of fire
[00:30:28] in this land.
[00:30:48] Greetings, it's 23:00, another news segment from the news
[00:30:52] channel. Deadline for registering information for increasing.