IRINN — broadcast
20261102 053000 UTC
475 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] is the resistance and the Islamic Republic of Iran. Very well, thank you very much, Mr. Regarding the end of the war, we refer to the ceasefire, but in the area of crisis, I think we should go to changing the calculations that made that war possible. If they want, they should go and change those conditions. Thank you very much, Dr., for your presence and explanations, and a special thank you for your companionship. In the name of God, greetings and good morning to you, dear and respected viewers. Welcome to the sports news. Shahshahani, Iran's first medalist in the 2026 Youth Olympics. On the first official day of these games, hosted by Dakar, Senegal, Parsa Shahshahani won the silver medal in the 200-meter backstroke with a time of 2 minutes, 2 seconds, and 74 hundredths of a second. In table tennis, Benjamin Faraji won his second match 3-0 against the Thai representative, and in volleyball,
[00:00:22] Good morning, dear viewers. You are watching the 9 AM news
[00:00:26] from Khabar Network. The Minister of Foreign Affairs of our country arrived in Ashgabat
[00:00:29] this morning for a meeting and consultation with Turkmen
[00:00:33] officials. Mr. Aragchi will discuss and consult on strengthening
[00:00:36] cooperation and expanding bilateral relations
[00:00:40] in various political and economic
[00:00:43] fields during this trip.
[00:00:45] The Commander of the National Police
[00:00:48] said that by the order of the Supreme Leader, the police
[00:00:52] are ready for all conditions, along with other
[00:00:56] armed forces. According to Brigadier General Ahmadreza
[00:01:00] Radan, if the enemy makes a mistake,
[00:01:03] it will suffer a defeat worse than in the past.
[00:01:07] Just as the Supreme Leader ordered the senior
[00:01:11] military commanders, all targets
[00:01:14] are being updated. The readiness of the armed
[00:01:18] forces has greatly increased since the war.
[00:01:21] We are sure that if the enemy makes a mistake,
[00:01:25] they will taste the bitter
[00:01:28] taste of defeat more than ever before.
[00:01:32] Everyone who supports the enemy in some way
[00:01:35] should know. If the next war
[00:01:39] happens, geography will no longer
[00:01:42] matter. Wherever the enemy's interests lie,
[00:01:45] it will be a legitimate target, God willing.
[00:01:48] The head of the Judicial and Legal Commission of the Parliament
[00:01:51] announced the plan to amend the Criminal Procedure
[00:01:55] Law and said that according to this amendment, the presence
[00:01:58] of a lawyer in the preliminary investigation stage
[00:02:02] will be mandatory at the client's request. If
[00:02:06] for any reason during the preliminary
[00:02:10] investigations, the officer does not provide
[00:02:14] the possibility for a lawyer to be present,
[00:02:17] all the investigations conducted will
[00:02:21] not be valid, and if those
[00:02:23] investigations are the basis for issuing a verdict,
[00:02:27] that verdict will also be invalid. If it becomes law,
[00:02:30] at least in the field of criminal offenses,
[00:02:34] and specifically in the area of issuing orders,
[00:02:37] more than 50% of the people who currently go to prison,
[00:02:40] God willing, will not go to prison after this law is passed.
[00:02:42] The "Ganj-e Ravān" (Flowing Treasure) exhibition
[00:02:45] was inaugurated with the aim of introducing a selection
[00:02:49] of donated and endowed works in the treasury
[00:02:52] of the Malek National Library and Museum. This exhibition, which showcases
[00:02:56] the value of the culture of endowment and the participation
[00:03:00] of benefactors in preserving national heritage,
[00:03:03] will be open to visitors for one month. To mark the 80th
[00:03:07] anniversary of the endowment
[00:03:10] of the museum and library,
[00:03:13] 89 works from the collection
[00:03:17] of Haj Hossein Agha Malek,
[00:03:20] both from him and from other
[00:03:24] endowers from his own family and other
[00:03:27] families and individuals,
[00:03:30] researchers, and others who
[00:03:33] have been in contact with the museum, both Iranians and non-Iranians,
[00:03:37] a collection of 89 works has been gathered
[00:03:41] and put on display for visitors as a selection
[00:03:45] of this "flowing treasure," a treasure that Haj Hossein Agha
[00:03:49] founded 89 years ago and is still active and flowing.
[00:03:53] Resistance cinema, in addition to narrating
[00:03:56] the events of war, also addresses
[00:03:58] its human, cultural, and identity dimensions.
[00:04:02] This cinema, by re-examining historical memories
[00:04:05] and realities, tries to narrate the experience
[00:04:09] of people's steadfastness and its impact
[00:04:12] on the lives of today's and future generations.
[00:04:16] One day, the sound
[00:04:21] of explosions will be silenced, but will the story
[00:04:24] of war also end?
[00:04:26] The story of people
[00:04:30] who stood firm, chose, and did not
[00:04:34] surrender still continues, but this time
[00:04:37] in the frame of cinema. And men of God
[00:04:41] are awake beyond this darkness. This spirit
[00:04:44] of steadfastness and resistance is showing itself
[00:04:48] more and more in our culture, and art is nothing
[00:04:51] but the mirror of culture, and cinema is nothing
[00:04:55] but what people are living. The narrative
[00:04:58] of this steadfastness for Iranian cinema began
[00:05:02] in the years of the Sacred Defense, when cameras, while recording
[00:05:06] the battlefield, depicted an epic.
[00:05:09] The initial origin of the Sacred Defense Festival,
[00:05:13] well, it was an 8-year war, but it did not
[00:05:16] change its approach later. It expanded its approach
[00:05:20] a bit, and that was a definition of resistance.
[00:05:24] It was a broader definition. But resistance was not
[00:05:27] meant to remain in the frame of war forever.
[00:05:31] Sometimes it takes shape in the heart of a city among people
[00:05:35] who decide to stay together in the hardest
[00:05:39] moments. Here, a missile, I don't know, a drone has hit, and smoke is coming out of it.
[00:05:43] Sometimes it's about overcoming fear, standing firm at a moment
[00:05:47] when everything can change. These people are our
[00:05:51] guests now. I myself came here to host them. And sometimes
[00:05:54] you have to take the camera into the heart of reality,
[00:05:57] where behind every event, life and human emotions
[00:06:01] flow. If I am to talk about a place, if I haven't
[00:06:04] seen it, it's impossible for me to talk about it.
[00:06:08] I can't.
[00:06:13] You witnessed three different perspectives, but one
[00:06:16] common point: resistance is not
[00:06:20] just fighting; sometimes it's preserving identity,
[00:06:23] cultural steadfastness, and making the right
[00:06:26] choice in difficult moments. Resistance cinema essentially
[00:06:30] should give a feeling to the people of society
[00:06:34] that they can be influential in this process of resistance.
[00:06:37] It's important that our cinema, considering various cultural,
[00:06:41] social, political, and even economic issues it addresses,
[00:06:44] also specifically addresses this topic and genre.
[00:06:48] Perhaps this is why these stories endure: that what
[00:06:52] we experience today will become part of the memory
[00:06:56] of a generation tomorrow. All films set during
[00:06:59] wartime, if they focus on the human aspect,
[00:07:03] can be the most current films. From the Sacred Defense
[00:07:06] until today, resistance cinema narrates the stories
[00:07:10] of people who stood firm at historical turning points,
[00:07:13] and as long as the story of steadfastness is narrated,
[00:07:16] these memories will remain alive. Atiyeh Rezaei,
[00:07:19] IRIB News Agency.
[00:07:25] Further news: According to the UN Office for the Coordination
[00:07:28] of Humanitarian Affairs, attacks by Zionist settlers in the West
[00:07:32] Bank have reached their highest level in 20 years.
[00:07:36] According to this announcement, in the past month,
[00:07:39] 397 violent acts
[00:07:42] against Palestinians have occurred, which is the highest number
[00:07:46] of attacks in one month since 2006. Also,
[00:07:50] according to this international body, during this period,
[00:07:53] 57 Palestinians, including 9 children,
[00:07:57] were injured in various areas of the West Bank
[00:08:00] and East Jerusalem, 23 of whom were injured
[00:08:03] in settler attacks and 34 by occupying
[00:08:07] forces. At the same time, news
[00:08:10] from all
[00:08:31] night gatherings and presence in the square
[00:08:35] reached 246.
[00:08:37] A presence in which people cited
[00:08:41] political and military power and progress in infrastructural,
[00:08:44] industrial, and defensive fields as achievements
[00:08:47] of Islamic Iran after the victory of the revolution.
[00:08:51] The land of lions, Iran.
[00:08:55] A sharp blade, Iran.
[00:08:59] If you want to point to one example
[00:09:02] of Islamic Iran's achievements in the past 47 years,
[00:09:06] which one would you point to? Freedom. The power
[00:09:09] of the Islamic Republic of Iran, its independence. We have
[00:09:13] been able to make great progress with more advanced
[00:09:16] missiles that superpowers don't even allow themselves
[00:09:20] to consider attacking. Progress in urban development,
[00:09:23] progress in sports,
[00:09:25] progress in construction, national production,
[00:09:29] now in the fields of steel, car manufacturing,
[00:09:31] and self-sufficiency. The flag of Iran
[00:09:35] is in the heart of the nation. The flag
[00:09:37] of Iran, according to many analysts,
[00:09:41] is now the fourth power in the world.
[00:09:44] What is the source of this power? This power
[00:09:47] is the result of the guidance of the martyred Imam
[00:09:50] and unity between the nation and the armed forces.
[00:09:54] This power is the result of the faith, will,
[00:09:57] and steadfastness of the valiant and brave
[00:10:01] nation of Islamic Iran, who are always present
[00:10:04] on the scene. The fourth power in the world
[00:10:07] is these very people who are the backbone of the revolution,
[00:10:11] the backbone of the fighters, the backbone of the armed forces. We will remain in the field
[00:10:15] for a long time.
[00:10:17] What do you think Iran's response to America's
[00:10:21] and the Zionist regime's adventures should be?
[00:10:25] In my opinion, it should be the same as what the Leader said.
[00:10:28] He said to respond without geographical limits.
[00:10:32] A crushing, deterrent, offensive response.
[00:10:35] It must be in the most severe,
[00:10:38] best, and most painful way possible. We must hit
[00:10:41] them very hard and powerfully so that they don't even mention
[00:10:45] Iran's name, let alone attack its soil.
[00:10:48] Iran is alive! Iran!
[00:10:51] Raise your flag! Until the next news
[00:10:55] segments of the day. In the name of God, greetings
[00:11:17] and good time to you, my dear compatriots
[00:11:21] and dear and respected viewers.
[00:11:24] Khabar Network is with you for another program,
[00:11:27] "Battle of Hormuz," for a closer look
[00:11:31] at current developments. On the eve
[00:11:34] of the US midterm
[00:11:36] elections, two paths simultaneously face Tehran
[00:11:40] and Washington. On one hand, mediators
[00:11:43] have become active to reach an agreement,
[00:11:46] a goal they are pursuing, including the reopening
[00:11:50] of the Strait of Hormuz. On the other hand, maintaining
[00:11:53] military readiness and threatening to resume
[00:11:57] attacks. A situation that can be described
[00:12:01] as diplomacy under military threat.
[00:12:04] Various news is circulating, but as we speak,
[00:12:07] the region is facing a situation where,
[00:12:11] simultaneously with diplomatic movement, military
[00:12:15] arrangements are also changing. Doha negotiations have entered
[00:12:19] their third day, and there is talk of a plan
[00:12:22] that links the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz
[00:12:26] to the implementation of Iran's conditions. But Washington claims
[00:12:29] that, according to Trump's latest claim,
[00:12:32] it still has the military option on its agenda.
[00:12:36] The main question at present is whether the two sides
[00:12:40] are moving towards an agreement to contain the crisis,
[00:12:43] or merely buying time
[00:12:46] for the next phase of confrontation.
[00:12:49] To discuss this issue, we are joined by Mr. Farkhondehpour,
[00:12:52] one of our country's experts
[00:12:55] on international affairs. Dr., greetings and welcome. In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
[00:12:58] I also extend my greetings to you, Mr. Saifi,
[00:13:02] your dear and respected colleagues, and also
[00:13:05] to the noble, great, and heroic people of Iran
[00:13:09] who are listening to the live news program. Let's start
[00:13:12] with this introduction. Do you think that what
[00:13:15] is being reported in the media is that both
[00:13:19] sides are seeking an active diplomacy
[00:13:23] to manage the crisis or to resolve it?
[00:13:30] Not merely buying time for a future that some believe will again see developments and war and such issues. In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. Well, as you are aware, the Islamic Republic
[00:13:34] of Iran has shown its sincerity in matters
[00:13:37] related to diplomacy and active diplomatic
[00:13:40] engagement. Throughout
[00:13:44] this period when we have
[00:13:46] witnessed various political and military
[00:13:50] fluctuations in the region,
[00:13:54] we have observed that the sincerity
[00:13:57] of the Islamic Republic of Iran
[00:14:00] in diplomacy, in observing diplomatic
[00:14:04] etiquette and rules of diplomacy,
[00:14:06] has truly been a very positive
[00:14:10] engagement in the world. We were
[00:14:14] in the midst of diplomatic
[00:14:17] agreements when, unfortunately,
[00:14:20] in two stages, we were subjected
[00:14:23] to heavy military aggression
[00:14:27] by the terrorist and criminal government
[00:14:30] of the United States and also the ominous
[00:14:33] Zionist regime. Well, we showed our sincerity
[00:14:37] in the rule of diplomacy, even though we received criticism.
[00:14:40] But the sincerity of the Islamic Republic of Iran is that
[00:14:43] war is the last resort, and
[00:14:47] you are aware that in political rules,
[00:14:51] we try our best not to raise the issue of war,
[00:14:55] because war, in any case, does not have a positive image.
[00:14:59] But when we see that the other side, with a savage
[00:15:02] and ignoble nature, is disrupting the rules of diplomacy
[00:15:06] and wants to gain concessions
[00:15:10] from the other side, here these issues
[00:15:13] are set aside, and the true face
[00:15:16] of the sincere battle of the Iranian people
[00:15:19] shows itself. Today, before I came
[00:15:23] to your presence, one of the expert
[00:15:26] and specific military experts I spoke with told me
[00:15:29] that we truly have not seen
[00:15:33] in this recent century any instance where the terrorist
[00:15:36] government of the United States has been defeated. They claim
[00:15:40] that in Vietnam
[00:15:42] we were militarily victorious, but politically defeated.
[00:15:46] They believe that in the Korean War,
[00:15:50] in various wars that, well, you are aware
[00:15:53] in this recent century the terrorist government of the United States
[00:15:57] inflicted countless wars on the people of the world.
[00:16:00] They believe that we were defeated in the political
[00:16:03] battle and succeeded in the military battle.
[00:16:07] But the only exception they bring up in the world
[00:16:10] now is the battle, the last two battles
[00:16:14] where, as you see, America truly was defeated. And American military experts
[00:16:17] also believe this, especially when they saw
[00:16:21] the power of the Islamic Republic of Iran and this management
[00:16:24] we had on the scene and in the streets,
[00:16:27] simultaneously at the launchers, it truly confronted
[00:16:30] them with a puzzle of why we entered
[00:16:34] this without consideration and without a pre-prepared
[00:16:54] plan. The Islamic Republic of Iran, well,
[00:16:58] as you mentioned, the third day
[00:17:01] of the Doha negotiations and the statements
[00:17:04] of the Supreme Leader, His Holiness Ayatollah Seyyed Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei,
[00:17:08] and his closing
[00:17:11] plan regarding the commands
[00:17:14] of our great military commanders,
[00:17:17] well, that really defined the end of the line
[00:17:21] for them. The Islamic Republic of Iran is ready for diplomacy
[00:17:24] and the acceptance of its seven conditions. This acceptance has probably
[00:17:28] been conveyed many times through our ambassadors,
[00:17:31] through envoys they have sent to Iran, or by many
[00:17:35] responsible officials who come for consultations
[00:17:38] as mediators to American officials. But
[00:17:42] if these seven conditions, which are the demands
[00:17:45] of the Iranian people, are met, and as you can
[00:17:49] see, people come to the field with sincerity and power
[00:17:53] and support the Islamic Republic of Iran, our borders,
[00:17:57] our land, our honor, everything. These are the demands
[00:18:00] of the people of the Islamic Republic, and these have been repeatedly
[00:18:04] brought to the attention of American officials
[00:18:07] in matters related to negotiations.
[00:18:11] If they accept, according to the rule that has been established,
[00:18:15] the Islamic Republic of Iran is ready. But if they want to act
[00:18:18] against this, or if they want to violate it, considering
[00:18:21] that, thank God, we are truly an exemplary
[00:18:25] country in terms of defense, many American media outlets
[00:18:28] refer to us as a superpower, not an American, but a European
[00:18:32] superpower, the fourth power in the world.
[00:18:35] They themselves know that in missile technology today,
[00:18:39] we are one of the most powerful countries in the world,
[00:18:42] and they themselves know that when a country reaches
[00:18:46] pinpoint accuracy in technology, it means it is among the superpowers
[00:18:50] of the world. It's not a simple matter, Mr. Saifi.
[00:18:54] You believe that we stand on our principles,
[00:18:57] and the ball is in their court, and they must decide. Yes,
[00:19:01] they must decide. Regarding diplomatic issues, we are ready.
[00:19:05] But regarding military issues, if, God forbid,
[00:19:08] they violate, our dear fighters will act with power
[00:19:12] and strength in all fronts, and those
[00:19:14] matters that we mentioned regarding geography,
[00:19:18] according to the statements of the Supreme Leader,
[00:19:21] that geography is no longer important to us, if they want
[00:19:24] to violate from now on, their targets are their
[00:19:27] economic targets that are important to us,
[00:19:31] and finally, in striking them, our brave fighters will not show
[00:19:35] the slightest deviation
[00:19:37] or shortcoming. Dr., when you look at the statements
[00:19:41] of both sides, the reality is that both
[00:19:45] sides have explicitly stated that the issue
[00:19:48] is trust. Now, they
[00:19:50] look at Iran and say that we must have a guarantee.
[00:19:54] And Iran, well, considering America's betrayals,
[00:19:57] demands this. In fact, when you look a bit
[00:20:00] more closely, it's only the sequence of actions
[00:20:03] that both sides must take. Iran says that
[00:20:07] first there should be the lifting of the siege
[00:20:10] and sanctions and these matters, and then
[00:20:13] in subsequent negotiations, we will enter into nuclear
[00:20:16] issues if we want to and talk. They say no, first nuclear,
[00:20:20] then we go to other issues and so on. What do you think
[00:20:24] this sequence will be? Is there a way for both
[00:20:27] sides to do it simultaneously, or will we eventually
[00:20:31] reach the same stalemate that we have now?
[00:20:35] Look, Americans are treacherous and unreliable, and this
[00:20:38] has been proven to all the people of the world
[00:20:42] and world public opinion. Look at the clear example
[00:20:45] of that, you can see it. Well, we don't want to go
[00:20:49] into the past and say what betrayals
[00:20:53] and violations they committed there. Just look at these
[00:20:56] two recent wars. They truly undermined our diplomatic
[00:21:00] negotiations and trampled on all the rules
[00:21:04] related to the structure of diplomacy. The perfidy
[00:21:08] of Americans has been proven to all the people of the world,
[00:21:11] to all public opinion. If you really go to intellectual
[00:21:14] circles that are analyzing, to public opinion that is really
[00:21:18] monitoring the facts,
[00:21:20] you will see that they only want negotiations
[00:21:24] to consolidate their position. After consolidating their position,
[00:21:27] rest assured that if circumstances allow,
[00:21:31] they will truly attack like a wild wolf,
[00:21:35] and the Islamic Republic of Iran has made the necessary
[00:21:39] preparations for this. And this audacity that
[00:21:42] they showed in two wars against Iran, and tasted
[00:21:46] defeat, just as in this war, if they don't follow
[00:21:50] the arrangements that you just mentioned,
[00:21:54] we are the ones who must determine the arrangements for them.
[00:21:57] We have been violated. They attacked
[00:22:00] our country. They martyred our great leader.
[00:22:03] They martyred his grandson. They martyred our great military
[00:22:07] commanders. And they martyred thousands of our oppressed
[00:22:10] and defenseless people. Here, we are the ones
[00:22:14] who must determine for them according
[00:22:17] to what rule they should proceed. If they act against this,
[00:22:21] which I hope they don't, the Islamic Republic
[00:22:24] of Iran has very heavy plans for them.
[00:22:27] Of course, Dr., in my opinion, if we look
[00:22:31] a bit more closely at the developments
[00:22:35] and statements of senior US officials,
[00:22:38] the scene is completely clear. Rubio, after
[00:22:41] those civilizational remarks he made,
[00:22:45] had an interview with one of the media outlets
[00:22:49] close to Trump. He made a very clear
[00:22:52] and important point regarding his
[00:22:54] allies, international organizations, and other
[00:22:58] countries of the world in line with the "America First"
[00:23:02] policy. He explicitly stated that our
[00:23:05] allies are defined in line with our interests,
[00:23:09] and international organizations are also treated the same
[00:23:13] way. That is, we see them positively
[00:23:16] only when they strengthen our interests. With this
[00:23:25] perspective, America is not looking for a win-win
[00:23:28] negotiation. It always follows the win-lose path
[00:23:31] and simply says my interests must be secured.
[00:23:33] Well, what will be the outcome with this
[00:23:37] approach? Look, Dr. Saifi, right now,
[00:23:40] on the political scene and in the political
[00:23:44] sphere of the world, we are seeing a chaotic
[00:23:47] Europe. In the past few days, please note,
[00:23:50] most major European countries like
[00:23:54] Germany and France have experienced unrest,
[00:23:56] all of which are weaknesses, and even acknowledged.
[00:24:00] German Chancellor Merz officially announced
[00:24:04] it. You see, the famous French President,
[00:24:07] they all came and announced that the problems we are
[00:24:11] currently seeing in our own society are all
[00:24:15] due to the war that America has started against Iran. And this is why
[00:24:18] they officially told Trump in many interviews,
[00:24:22] when he was sitting and they were on his left
[00:24:26] and right, that we will not be with you in this war,
[00:24:30] because our interests do not dictate
[00:24:32] it. I must address your question. Today,
[00:24:36] America's allies are not those allies
[00:24:39] who, as the "troika" of Europe, always
[00:24:43] blindly followed America's policies. Now, when they
[00:24:47] saw internal pressure and this wave of people,
[00:24:58] well, the American war has affected all segments
[00:25:01] of society there. After all, the gasoline
[00:25:04] they use, the diesel they use, the gas they consume,
[00:25:07] all of these have caused the economic pillars
[00:25:11] of America's allies to shake, and we are seeing
[00:25:15] these tremors, and they are increasing day by day.
[00:25:18] Yes, Trump says these things because he naturally
[00:25:22] knows he's a person who lives in his own fantasies,
[00:25:25] and I feel that when this person wants to make
[00:25:29] himself overly newsworthy, he comes up with a so-called
[00:25:33] something. Perhaps in the two so-called
[00:25:36] unintended wars that were imposed on the Islamic Republic
[00:25:40] of Iran, they came and provided bases
[00:25:43] to them, and we have complete information.
[00:25:47] But now, those allies who used to come behind
[00:25:51] Trump and support him, that power no longer
[00:25:55] exists. Even much of the information
[00:25:59] we received shows that many European officials,
[00:26:04] through messages they sent to Trump, told him
[00:26:08] that if another war happens, it's true that you might
[00:26:12] want to make a propaganda move, but be careful
[00:26:15] that our economy and our sovereignty
[00:26:18] will be destabilized here. And they officially told
[00:26:21] him that we will not be with you because
[00:26:25] the strike of the Islamic Republic of Iran is a very
[00:26:28] effective strike that Europeans have not experienced in these recent decades.
[00:26:40] And as Major General Rezaei said,
[00:26:44] they must also pay the price for these
[00:26:47] so-called assassinations and crimes they committed
[00:26:51] against the Iranian people. Very well, let's go back
[00:26:55] to the region a bit. Our regional countries,
[00:26:59] three of their senior security officials
[00:27:01] have also traveled to Tehran: Pakistan, Saudi Arabia,
[00:27:05] and Turkey. And before that, three European countries
[00:27:08] announced that we are ready for dialogue
[00:27:12] with Iran. And then those three neighboring
[00:27:15] countries came, and even though they themselves
[00:27:19] were pursuing their own policies outside the region,
[00:27:23] they also signed agreements with each other. But in the end,
[00:27:26] they came to the conclusion that, first, they cannot
[00:27:30] confront America, and second,
[00:27:36] this trend tells us that both in the world
[00:27:39] and in the region, Iran must be seen.
[00:27:43] If we want security stability and regional
[00:27:47] stability, how do we evaluate the trend
[00:27:51] when they have reached this conclusion? How
[00:27:54] are they still drawing other plans?
[00:27:58] I wish these countries had reached this conclusion
[00:28:01] that you mentioned sooner.
[00:28:08] Because they have realized this reality that
[00:28:11] order, security, and peace are not
[00:28:14] imported. If Americans truly
[00:28:18] believe in this, why can't they provide
[00:28:22] their own security? In fact, one of the reasons
[00:28:25] they came to Iran is precisely because they
[00:28:29] saw that they were very much destabilized
[00:30:24] in terms of security. And this rule and this statement
[00:30:28] that you made, they will only realize
[00:30:31] it when America cannot bring
[00:30:35] peace, security, and tranquility
[00:30:37] to them. And this has been a result that they
[00:30:41] have achieved with the power and military
[00:30:44] might of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and they
[00:30:48] believe that any movement that wants to happen
[00:30:51] in the political sphere of the West
[00:30:54] Asian region, certainly one of the influential
[00:30:58] forces and countries