IRINN — broadcast
20261102 073000 UTC
500 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] consensus against Iran at these meetings? The reason is that the Americans...
[00:00:08] Thank you so much for this opportunity. Now, in recent weeks,
[00:00:11] allegations of antisemitism against Iran have
[00:00:13] intensified with several European countries, including Germany
[00:00:17] and the UK as well as Australia, accusing
[00:00:20] Iran of plotting to harm Jewish individuals
[00:00:24] and property. Canada's CBS also aired a detailed
[00:00:28] report on the matter a few days ago.
[00:00:53] European countries, including Germany, the UK, and Australia, have accused Iran
[00:00:57] of planning to harm Jewish individuals and
[00:01:00] property. Canada's CBS also ran a detailed report a few
[00:01:04] days ago about this, and, of course, without providing
[00:01:07] any evidence or documents, accused Iran
[00:01:10] of planning anti-Jewish movements in Europe,
[00:01:14] Australia, and Canada. What is Iran's stance on
[00:01:16] these accusations? Look, the accusation of
[00:01:20] anti-Semitism does not stick to Iran
[00:01:23] and Iranians. Fundamentally, the phenomenon of anti-Semitism
[00:01:27] is a European phenomenon. It has
[00:01:31] no connection to Iranian religion, traditions, culture,
[00:01:34] or civilization.
[00:01:38] They constantly repeat a cliché
[00:01:41] accusation,
[00:01:43] and unfortunately, the mass media
[00:01:47] also promotes it, while
[00:01:51] if they pay the slightest attention to the facts, they
[00:01:54] will realize that, in fact, the kindest
[00:01:58] people to Jews have been Iranians. You just need to
[00:02:02] look at the statistics to see that in the city of
[00:02:05] Yazd alone, we have 13 or 14
[00:02:09] Jewish synagogues. Throughout
[00:02:12] Iran, there are about 100 synagogues.
[00:02:15] You
[00:02:19] can look at the tombs of prophets
[00:02:21] and Jewish elders that are scattered throughout Iran.
[00:02:25] Despite the fact that
[00:02:28] we are facing an all-out war with
[00:02:32] a regime that falsely claims to represent Jews,
[00:02:36] how many instances of aggression
[00:02:39] against
[00:02:42] Jewish holy sites have we seen? If there
[00:02:46] have been rare cases,
[00:02:48] they have been dealt with immediately. This issue
[00:02:52] really needs to be paid
[00:02:55] attention to. Compare it with what is happening
[00:02:58] in European countries. Why are they fundamentally accusing Iran?
[00:03:02] They are trying to attribute their own problems to others.
[00:03:06] We should ask Europe what they have done,
[00:03:10] what culture they have created that every day we
[00:03:13] hear news about attacks on Jewish cemeteries, that synagogues
[00:03:17] in European capitals must be
[00:03:20] covered with barbed wire or that they
[00:03:23] recently remove their signs to protect themselves
[00:03:27] from attacks. Are these
[00:03:31] related to Iran? Are those incidents happening in Tehran
[00:03:34] and other Iranian cities? Therefore, European countries
[00:03:38] really need to come to their senses.
[00:03:41] Part of these incidents in
[00:03:44] Europe stem from the crimes committed by
[00:03:47] the Zionist regime who constantly associate
[00:03:51] themselves with Judaism. However, the Iranian
[00:03:54] people are more understanding and civilized than
[00:03:58] to attribute the actions of a genocidal regime
[00:04:01] to the followers of the Jewish faith.
[00:04:05] Decision.
[00:04:08] I extend my greetings and respect to you, Dr. Despite the ongoing
[00:04:11] mediations and diplomatic activities,
[00:04:15] the head of the American terrorist government hostilely stated
[00:04:18] that a few Iranian nuclear facilities remain
[00:04:22] until we take action against them. I wanted to ask what legal
[00:04:26] follow-ups Iran is pursuing regarding these statements,
[00:04:29] as even verbally, this is an aggression, and what action
[00:04:32] is being taken regarding this
[00:04:35] aggression? We will certainly
[00:04:38] document
[00:04:41] flagrant violations of international law and the UN
[00:04:44] Charter. But we have
[00:04:48] learned from experience
[00:04:51] that the world
[00:04:55] is all talk. We
[00:04:58] are sorry that the United Nations,
[00:05:01] the Security Council, the Board of Governors of the International
[00:05:05] Atomic Energy Agency in the face of such flagrant
[00:05:09] criticisms, such threats that are contrary
[00:05:15] to the principle
[00:05:15] of, look,
[00:05:20] America is practically the biggest threat
[00:05:22] to the non-proliferation regime.
[00:05:26] The mere expression of a threat against
[00:05:30] a country, an implied threat that
[00:05:34] we might use such-and-such a weapon, is
[00:05:38] a kind of encouragement to
[00:05:41] violate the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
[00:05:44] In any case, other nuclear-weapon states
[00:05:47] are carefully observing
[00:05:50] America's behavior. America is creating a pattern
[00:05:54] at the international level that will result in threatening
[00:05:58] international peace and security for all countries.
[00:06:01] Be sure that the threats against us
[00:06:04] will strengthen our resolve
[00:06:07] to enhance our capabilities
[00:06:10] for self-defense.
[00:06:16] Hello, Mr. Baghaei. Good day. Mr. Baghaei, I wanted
[00:06:19] to ask you about this issue, considering
[00:06:23] that we are witnessing a acceleration
[00:06:25] in the negotiation process in
[00:06:29] recent days. However, we are seeing a dual
[00:06:33] contradiction from American officials. On one hand,
[00:06:36] Mr. Roby and Mr. Trump are still threatening Iran. For example, last night,
[00:06:39] Mr. Trump said, "Because I am kind, I have not
[00:06:43] finished Iran's work, but I must finish Iran's work at some point."
[00:06:47] But on the other hand, Mr. Vance writes letters to
[00:06:51] Iran and to the Secretary of the National Council, and it is now said
[00:06:54] that the content of the letter or the tone of the letter was
[00:06:58] not very harsh. How do you assess this duality? Is this a deception
[00:07:02] operation that we have seen before in two previous wars?
[00:07:06] Does this process affect Iran's
[00:07:09] trust in negotiations or not? Thanks. Well,
[00:07:13] any operation, assuming it is a deception, which is not
[00:07:17] at all surprising from this group, has two sides: one deceiver
[00:07:21] and one deceived. Well, we are not
[00:07:23] deceived and we will
[00:07:27] not be. This is not our first experience
[00:07:31] dealing with American counterparts. We certainly
[00:07:34] have not forgotten that just
[00:07:38] half an hour before their military aggression on June 13,
[00:07:43] the US President tweeted and announced that negotiations
[00:07:47] with Iranians were still ongoing. We
[00:07:50] are fully aware of what has happened in these past two years
[00:07:53] and before that, the experience of 2015-2018.
[00:07:57] We consider all of these.
[00:08:00] Look,
[00:08:05] the fact that at the level of the American
[00:08:08] ruling establishment, there may be
[00:08:11] different voices. Voices that sometimes
[00:08:14] may reflect
[00:08:17] the general public's demand for an independent
[00:08:20] approach to developments in the Middle East.
[00:08:24] We cannot conclude that American society
[00:08:27] is tired of
[00:08:30] the parasitic behavior of the Zionist regime towards
[00:08:34] America and is angry about it. We are witnessing
[00:08:37] this in both opinion polls and demonstrations
[00:08:41] taking place in America. Therefore,
[00:08:44] it is not far-fetched that some
[00:08:47] within the American ruling establishment have reached
[00:08:51] this conclusion, even if they don't express it,
[00:08:53] or sometimes they do express
[00:08:56] that America is sacrificing its credibility,
[00:09:00] wealth, and position for a party
[00:09:03] that thinks of nothing but eternal war in
[00:09:06] our region. The Zionist regime has proven
[00:09:09] that
[00:09:19] with these descriptions,
[00:09:21] well, we can
[00:09:24] take different viewpoints into consideration.
[00:09:28] However, I emphasize that for us, the actions of
[00:09:32] the US government are important. These contradictory
[00:09:35] stances indicate confusion among themselves
[00:09:38] and also leave the international community
[00:09:42] questioning who truly
[00:09:45] is the real player in the governance
[00:09:49] and decision-making system in America. Who should be talked
[00:09:52] to in America? Does
[00:09:55] all roads eventually lead to Tel Aviv?
[00:09:58] This is something that America must decide as soon
[00:10:01] as possible for its own credibility and standing.
[00:10:05] A student.
[00:10:08] Hello, Dr. Baghaei. Good day. The advisor to
[00:10:11] the UAE President stated that our trust
[00:10:15] in Iran is gone, and it wasn't us who destroyed it. Given
[00:10:19] the UAE's role in the aggressive attacks against Iran,
[00:10:22] what is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' stance on this?
[00:10:43] is not prudence, and of course, they can be prudent, provided
[00:10:47] that they
[00:10:48] decide
[00:10:52] to abandon their wrong past approaches. Iran cannot remain silent
[00:10:55] in the face of the use of the territory of some
[00:10:58] countries in the region for aggression and
[00:11:02] transgression against its national sovereignty,
[00:11:05] against its people, and not respond. What happened
[00:11:09] in these past eight months
[00:11:12] was the result of the excessive trust
[00:11:16] and reliance of some countries in the region
[00:11:19] on the military presence of the US in their territory.
[00:11:23] Unfortunately, some countries not only did not prevent
[00:11:26] the US from using their
[00:11:30] facilities for aggression against Iran, but also
[00:11:33] encouraged it. Trust
[00:11:35] requires bilateral action and
[00:11:39] movement. The Islamic Republic of Iran
[00:11:42] has repeatedly stated that this is our
[00:11:45] sincere and principled position that we have no
[00:11:49] enmity with any country in the region.
[00:11:52] We believe that for the creation of sustainable
[00:11:56] security, the countries of the region must cooperate
[00:11:59] with each other and build trust. At the same time, the reasonable
[00:12:03] expectation of Iranians is that the countries
[00:12:06] of the region will not allow their soil and facilities
[00:12:10] to be misused for aggression against
[00:12:14] a large neighboring country.
[00:12:17] Mr. Baghaei, recently, several Kuwaiti citizens and an Iranian
[00:12:21] citizen were sentenced to death and life
[00:12:25] imprisonment for allegedly collaborating with Iran
[00:12:28] and attempting to harm Kuwaiti officials. What is the Foreign
[00:12:32] Ministry's stance on this? Our embassy issued
[00:12:35] a statement in this regard.
[00:12:38] Absolutely, this accusation
[00:12:41] is rejected. We call
[00:12:45] on the Kuwaiti government to stop harassing
[00:12:48] its citizens on the pretext of sympathy
[00:12:52] and empathy with Iran. The accusations that
[00:12:56] have been leveled against Iran or Iranians
[00:12:59] in the past year or two, especially
[00:13:02] in recent months,
[00:13:04] have no basis. They are merely
[00:13:08] repetitions of clichés against Iran. As we
[00:13:12] said, we adhere to the principle of good neighborliness,
[00:13:16] respect for national sovereignty and territorial
[00:13:18] integrity of countries. Unfortunately, we have witnessed
[00:13:22] similar actions in Bahrain, not just in Kuwait. These
[00:13:26] violate both fundamental human rights principles
[00:13:30] and further undermine the principle of good neighborliness.
[00:13:33] Hello, Dr.
[00:13:38] Good day. As you yourself
[00:13:42] mentioned, in
[00:13:45] recent days, we have witnessed constant
[00:13:48] verbal attacks and counterattacks
[00:13:51] between Iran and the United States.
[00:13:55] Is there a feeling in Tehran that
[00:13:58] these attacks might
[00:14:00] lead to a renewed conflict
[00:14:03] and war? Thank you.
[00:14:06] War is happening right now as we speak.
[00:14:09] The economic siege of Iran,
[00:14:13] the threats against Iran, these
[00:14:17] are all part of the war that
[00:14:21] has existed for these eight months. We must
[00:14:25] be ready for any eventuality because it is about defending
[00:14:29] the homeland, defending the territorial integrity
[00:14:32] and dignity of a civilization spanning several thousand years.
[00:14:35] Therefore, in any situation,
[00:14:39] even when our friends are
[00:14:42] talking to mediators about diplomatic
[00:14:46] processes, and in situations
[00:14:49] where diplomacy is not ongoing, in any case,
[00:14:53] we must be prepared
[00:15:12] for all scenarios. Given the repetition of
[00:15:16] the UAE's claims about the Iranian Triple Islands by
[00:15:20] the Canadian Prime Minister and the threatening remarks
[00:15:23] by Anwar Gargash about the military option not being ruled out
[00:15:27] against Iran, can we say that these stances are due to
[00:15:31] a kind of emboldenment of the UAE under the influence
[00:15:35] of recent regional developments and the military aggression
[00:15:40] of the US and the Zionist regime against Iran? What is your assessment of
[00:15:43] this approach and message? We also announced
[00:15:46] our position on that joint statement
[00:15:50] by one of the Emirati officials with Canada
[00:15:54] and elaborated on it in a tweet.
[00:15:57] I won't repeat it to save time,
[00:16:01] but to put it very briefly, I will
[00:16:04] quote from Yaghma-ye Jandaqi in one reference:
[00:16:25] Is it possible that Iran agrees, within the framework of
[00:16:28] reaching an agreement, to transfer
[00:16:32] 60% enriched uranium to a third country? And
[00:16:35] was this issue indeed raised during the Doha
[00:16:39] negotiations? Is it possible that Iran, to reach
[00:16:41] an agreement, might agree to
[00:16:45] export 60% enriched uranium to a third country?
[00:16:49] And was this issue even raised in the Doha negotiations?
[00:17:03] Good day, Mr. Baghaei. Thank you, Mr.
[00:17:05] Baghaei. The murmur of public demand
[00:17:09] for a change in nuclear doctrine is growing louder
[00:17:12] day by day. Two nights ago, the Secretary of the Supreme
[00:17:16] National Security Council said that no decision
[00:17:19] has yet been made at the system level in this regard. How
[00:17:23] is this issue raised at your negotiation table?
[00:17:27] I mean, is it just at the media level,
[00:17:30] or is the issue conveyed in such a way that the other
[00:17:33] side, in their assessment for decision-making,
[00:17:37] understands the seriousness of the demand, at least
[00:17:41] from the Iranian people, and considers the power
[00:17:45] of this demand on decision-making bodies in Iran?
[00:17:48] I think the other side
[00:17:51] is observing the discussions and
[00:17:54] discourse in the media, among elites, and among the general
[00:17:58] public. We don't need
[00:18:00] to pretend about what is
[00:18:04] happening
[00:18:07] in discussions and discourse. This is a real
[00:18:10] issue that our people, in light of
[00:18:13] the events that occurred in the past two years,
[00:18:17] and again, I emphasize, the events
[00:18:20] of the past 12 or 13 years
[00:18:23] since the negotiations began and led to the nuclear
[00:18:27] agreement in 2015 and the developments after that,
[00:18:31] well, they raise a logical
[00:18:35] question, which is that
[00:18:38] despite all of Iran's efforts
[00:18:41] to show that its nuclear
[00:18:45] program is peaceful, the other side has constantly
[00:18:49] been looking for excuses. This is
[00:18:52] a real issue.
[00:18:54] The
[00:18:57] other side assassinated the issuer
[00:19:01] of the fatwa prohibiting the production
[00:19:04] and use of nuclear weapons.
[00:19:08] I said before that the reason
[00:19:11] for the emergence of this discussion, not only in our society
[00:19:15] but also at the international level, is none other
[00:19:18] than America and the Zionist regime. Iran's nuclear
[00:19:21] program has always been peaceful and remains
[00:19:25] peaceful. This has been proven
[00:19:28] many times. The fact that
[00:19:31] the other side, based on a big lie that they
[00:19:35] started 20 years ago, constantly
[00:19:37] and no matter how much
[00:19:43] repeats the claim of nuclear weapons or the
[00:19:45] danger of Iranian nuclear weapons,
[00:19:49] well, this fuels the discussion that they are pretending
[00:19:53] to be asleep,
[00:19:57] we argue and provide evidence that Iran's nuclear
[00:20:00] program is peaceful, they are not going to take
[00:20:03] it seriously. So, this is a real issue.
[00:20:07] However, as was announced, at the decision-making
[00:20:11] level, we are still a member
[00:20:14] of the NPT, and as long as Iran
[00:20:17] is a member
[00:20:20] of the NPT, it considers itself bound
[00:20:23] and committed to upholding the commitments
[00:20:27] contained in that document.
[00:20:31] What is Iran's position on this? Well, they say that one blindness
[00:20:34] begets another. Look, the Zionist
[00:20:37] regime is an illegitimate regime that was founded
[00:20:41] on the usurpation of a land, and
[00:20:45] well, naturally, it seeks
[00:20:48] to gain allies and create
[00:20:52] division and tension among the countries of
[00:20:55] the region and Islamic countries. You know better than I do
[00:20:59] that from the very beginning when this issue was raised,
[00:21:02] both Somalia as the main country
[00:21:05] and a country that is recognized by the entire
[00:21:08] world at the United Nations, protested
[00:21:12] strongly. The Arab League, the African
[00:21:14] Union, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, and
[00:21:18] many Western and European countries protested
[00:21:22] this process because they know that this
[00:21:25] process is aimed at destroying peace
[00:21:29] and security in this region.
[00:21:33] Therefore, both Islamic countries
[00:21:36] and African countries must be more careful
[00:21:39] that the mischief of the
[00:21:43] Zionist regime does not
[00:21:46] threaten peace and security in that region even more
[00:21:59] Considering recent regional developments and the changing
[00:22:02] role and extent of America's influence
[00:22:05] on the foreign policy of Iran's neighboring countries,
[00:22:08] in past years, it played an active role in holding
[00:22:12] regional diplomatic initiatives and meetings,
[00:22:16] such as the Contact Group. However, it seems that
[00:22:20] this trend has faded in recent years. Does the Ministry of
[00:22:23] Foreign Affairs have a plan to revive regional meetings,
[00:22:27] resume diplomatic initiatives, and strengthen
[00:22:30] Iran's role in the new regional developments and arrangements?
[00:22:33] Yes.
[00:22:37] No, we have done it. Last year,
[00:22:40] we utilized
[00:22:43] several important opportunities, including
[00:22:47] one of the Shanghai meetings, to hold
[00:22:50] a quadrilateral meeting.
[00:22:54] As a prelude to holding a quadrilateral
[00:22:57] meeting, probably in the coming
[00:23:00] months.
[00:23:03] The Director-General for Bilateral Affairs has
[00:23:06] had trips to regional countries, to Turkey, to
[00:23:10] Pakistan. We are pursuing this matter
[00:23:12] with diligence and seriousness.
[00:23:15] The Moscow format
[00:23:19] was held again in October,
[00:23:22] and on its sidelines, consultations were held to ensure
[00:23:25] that this process continues
[00:23:28] strongly. Therefore, developments
[00:23:32] related to the region have not made us neglect
[00:23:36] the importance of the processes related to
[00:23:39] Afghanistan and regional security related to Afghanistan.
[00:23:42] Iran First, please. Hello,
[00:23:46] Mr. Baghaei. Good day. The Iranian Foreign
[00:23:50] Minister is currently in Turkmenistan. My question
[00:23:53] to you is about the relations and
[00:23:56] level of relations between Iran and Turkmenistan,
[00:23:59] especially in economic fields, given that
[00:24:02] Iran is facing sanctions. How can economic relations
[00:24:06] between Iran and Turkmenistan facilitate the situation,
[00:24:09] and is the economic deputy of the foreign minister accompanying
[00:24:13] him on this trip? Yes, the economic
[00:24:16] deputy is there,
[00:24:20] as are representatives from other economic
[00:24:22] and related agencies, including the Ministry of Oil.
[00:24:26] Our relationship with our neighbors is strategic
[00:24:29] for us. Our neighbors are
[00:24:33] one of Iran's territorial
[00:24:37] and geopolitical advantages. And thank
[00:24:40] God, in recent years, based on
[00:24:44] the neighborhood policy, relations have been improving
[00:24:47] day by day. Including in...
[00:24:56] This is a bilateral trip. Discussions will
[00:24:59] be held on bilateral cooperation in various
[00:25:03] fields, including economic, trade, and energy.
[00:25:06] And we hope that the outcome
[00:25:09] of this trip
[00:25:12] will certainly be effective
[00:25:16] and beneficial for improving economic relations between the two countries.
[00:25:28] Hello, Dr. Good day. I would like to say that
[00:25:32] in recent days, after the statements
[00:25:35] of the German Chancellor, Dr. Araghchi tweeted,
[00:25:38] and in this tweet, he emphasized
[00:25:42] that if another war
[00:25:44] or conflict actually occurs, it will have no restrictions,
[00:25:48] and Iran will have no red lines. Does
[00:25:52] this mean that in the event of
[00:25:56] another military war, the scope of this war
[00:25:59] could extend to American interests and bases in Europe?
[00:26:03] Well, you certainly don't expect me to elaborate
[00:26:07] on the minister's statements.
[00:26:09] I think it was
[00:26:11] very clear.
[00:26:15] First of all, those who impose war on Iran
[00:26:19] or have imposed it, and those
[00:26:21] who in any way participate,
[00:26:25] cooperate, or support it, should certainly
[00:26:29] not expect Iranians to defend
[00:26:37] themselves. The fact that, both according to international
[00:26:40] law and human
[00:26:43] reason,
[00:26:45] any party that in any way
[00:26:49] participates in the preparation, planning, and execution
[00:26:52] of military aggression against a country
[00:26:56] is considered a participant
[00:26:59] in an internationally unlawful act.
[00:27:07] Therefore, any party that
[00:27:10] cooperates with America and the Zionist
[00:27:14] regime in any aggression should certainly
[00:27:17] not consider itself safe from Iran's
[00:27:21] powerful response. Breaking
[00:27:23] news.
[00:27:26] Hello, Mr. Baghaei. Good day. Mr. Baghaei, American
[00:27:30] officials have again
[00:27:51] shown that they only surrender and are humble
[00:27:54] in the face of will and power.
[00:27:57] That too is outside the bounds of humanity.
[00:28:01] We have only learned
[00:28:11] from God. The Atomic Energy Organization announced
[00:28:15] at the Security Council meeting that any path
[00:28:19] to resolve Iran's nuclear file must include
[00:28:22] agency inspections. Meanwhile, the US is also seeking
[00:28:26] to add demands in the nuclear field to the negotiations.
[00:28:30] What is the Foreign Ministry's position on this,
[00:28:34] and under what conditions will Iran agree to renewed
[00:28:38] inspections? The Director-General of the Agency
[00:28:41] owes a lot to Iran. He must settle his
[00:28:44] previous debts. Then he should
[00:28:48] talk about the future process.
[00:28:50] A major debt of the Director-General
[00:28:54] of the Agency is
[00:28:56] that in dealing
[00:29:00] with the criminal and illegal actions of
[00:29:04] the US and the Zionist regime in attacking Iran's
[00:29:07] nuclear facilities, he did not
[00:29:11] take a position, and furthermore, by
[00:29:14] preparing ambiguous reports,
[00:29:17] he in a way created
[00:29:20] a climate to
[00:29:24] justify the crimes of the US and
[00:29:27] the Zionist regime. The credibility of the International
[00:29:31] Atomic Energy Agency has unfortunately been
[00:29:35] severely damaged from that time
[00:29:37] until now, and in this regard,
[00:29:40] the Director-General himself has direct
[00:29:44] responsibility. We are currently in
[00:29:47] the stage of discussions through
[00:29:50] mediators to advance Iran's demands.
[00:29:54] Everything depends on whether the other
[00:29:56] side, the American side, which started
[00:30:00] this dirty game,
[00:30:03] implements Iran's demands and conditions. Then
[00:30:06] we will have to talk
[00:30:08] about the next steps.
[00:30:12] Come forward, PANA.
[00:30:14] Please.
[00:30:20] Hello,
[00:30:24] Dr. Good day. My question to you
[00:30:28] is that we saw that at the G20 Foreign
[00:30:31] Ministers' meeting,
[00:30:35] it was largely agreed to place the issue of Iran
[00:30:38] and the Strait of Hormuz at the top of the agenda.
[00:30:42] However, the differences over Iran and the Middle
[00:30:45] East are so deep that we even saw that the usual
[00:30:49] group photo at multilateral meetings was not held,
[00:30:53] and no joint statement was issued. In your opinion,
[00:30:56] what is the main reason for America's failure to build