IRINN — broadcast
20261102 080000 UTC
417 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] was And if those to implement investigations...
[00:00:03] Iran's demands and conditions, and then we should talk
[00:00:06] about the next steps.
[00:00:08] Come forward, Pana.
[00:00:12] Hello, Dr. May your
[00:00:24] time be good. Hello. My question to
[00:00:28] you is that we saw in the meeting of the G20 foreign ministers,
[00:00:32] which was hosted by Marco Rubio, many efforts were made to
[00:00:35] actually bring the issue of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz to the top
[00:00:39] of the discussions. However, the differences over Ukraine
[00:00:43] and the Middle East are very deep, so much so that we even
[00:00:47] saw that the usual group photo of multilateral meetings was not held,
[00:00:52] President Trump? We're in and in fact, a joint statement was not issued. In your opinion,
[00:00:54] what is the main reason for America's failure to build this consensus against Iran
[00:00:58] in these meetings? The reason don't know the alphabet
[00:01:02] of diplomacy at all or
[00:01:06] have forgotten it. The world has wisely realized that America,
[00:01:10] due to its addiction to
[00:01:13] a unilateral approach and excessive
[00:01:16] reliance on force,
[00:01:19] is seeking to impose only
[00:01:22] its narrow-minded interests and demands
[00:01:26] in every issue
[00:01:29] and in relation to every problem
[00:01:32] that exists in the world. And for this reason, the world does not cooperate
[00:01:35] with America in this process. In relation to the Strait
[00:01:38] of Hormuz, everyone knows
[00:01:41] that the reason for creating problems
[00:01:45] and disruptions in shipping in the Strait
[00:01:47] of Hormuz
[00:01:49] in many ways, will be a was America and the Zionist regime. Even America's
[00:01:53] allies cannot
[00:01:54] ignore this. For this reason,
[00:01:58] at the international level,
[00:02:01] a kind of clear anger can be seen
[00:02:05] towards America's actions, and its signs can be clearly
[00:02:09] seen in such meetings.
[00:02:12] Borna,
[00:02:14] hello, Mr. Speaker, may your time be good.
[00:02:18] Given the published reports
[00:02:21] about America's efforts to persuade Iran to agree
[00:02:25] with America through economic incentives and security
[00:02:29] proposals, does
[00:03:00] your opinion on the results of these elections affect
[00:03:03] the reduction or renewal of military tension between Iran and
[00:03:06] America? We follow this through television.
[00:03:09] Look,
[00:03:15] regardless of the outcome
[00:03:17] of the elections, what is important to us
[00:03:21] is the preservation of Iran's national
[00:03:25] security and interests.
[00:03:28] We know
[00:03:31] that a new
[00:03:34] America will not be born with an election.
[00:03:37] America's confrontation with
[00:03:39] Iran, or rather,
[00:03:42] America's malice against
[00:03:47] Hasten to Iran, dates back more than 70 years to the coup of August
[00:03:53] Hasten to 1953. Therefore, we have seen these developments many times. We
[00:03:56] have seen the comings and goings. From this perspective, we
[00:04:03] Hasten to
[00:04:10] Hasten to salvation.
[00:04:30] have spent these years to reopen
[00:04:34] the Strait of Hormuz and advance the negotiations. Also, regarding
[00:04:37] the blocked funds, is Iran's request to recover
[00:04:41] all the blocked funds or has a portion
[00:04:44] been discussed? Look, we
[00:04:47] don't want to reinvent
[00:04:51] the wheel.
[00:04:51] These negotiations
[00:04:55] should not be seen
[00:04:58] as disconnected
[00:05:01] and separate from the negotiations
[00:05:05] that led to the Islamabad agreement. Because
[00:05:08] the parties to the negotiations are the same.
[00:05:11] The demands are the same. The problem
[00:05:13] is the same.
[00:05:16] Therefore, if I want to answer
[00:05:20] you very simply and concisely, our demands
[00:05:24] are those that America
[00:05:26] accepted in the framework of the Islamabad
[00:05:29] agreement, but then violated. This means that
[00:05:33] what America must do in the first
[00:05:36] stage is, firstly, lift all sanctions
[00:05:40] that were imposed
[00:05:43] against Iran after the violation
[00:05:47] of the Islamabad agreement under the title
[00:05:50] of economic terrorism, in addition to the very things
[00:05:54] that were accepted in that text, including
[00:05:57] the release of Iran's assets and
[00:06:00] properties. Therefore, I want to emphasize
[00:06:03] that some people sometimes misuse the fact that Iran has set
[00:06:07] preconditions for diplomacy. These are not
[00:06:10] preconditions that
[00:06:19] concern Hormuz and the Persian Gulf. The demands are not strange
[00:06:23] or unusual things. They are rights that have been taken
[00:06:26] away from us, violated,
[00:06:28] and we say that in order
[00:06:31] for security to return to the Strait of Hormuz,
[00:06:35] it is necessary that you allow these violated
[00:06:38] rights of Iran to be restored,
[00:06:41] and after that, we can talk
[00:06:44] about the next steps. Rokna,
[00:06:46] hello, Dr.
[00:06:50] Don't be tired. You answered
[00:06:53] part of my question when you answered my colleague,
[00:06:57] but I want to say that given the possibility of Republicans
[00:07:00] losing the majority of votes in Congress and the Senate,
[00:07:03] and considering that Democrats have repeatedly expressed their
[00:07:06] opposition to war against Iran,
[00:07:10] what is your assessment of the timing?
[00:07:31] We do not link decision-making regarding the preservation of Iran's
[00:07:35] national interests and security to anything else anywhere in the world.
[00:07:39] We make decisions based on our own interests.
[00:08:00] And we make decisions about the manner
[00:08:03] of its implementation, its timing, and
[00:08:07] its form, taking into account
[00:08:10] all considerations. Please go ahead, Sputnik.
[00:08:16] Hello, Dr. Good day and don't be tired.
[00:08:20] My question to you is regarding the statements you
[00:08:23] yourself made. You declared that the threats made
[00:08:27] against Iran in the media and verbally
[00:08:31] are a kind of war against Iran, and you had declared
[00:08:34] that Mr. Carson, regarding the possibility of a nuclear
[00:08:38] attack against Kolnong,
[00:08:41] when he spoke about this, you described it as a pressure
[00:08:44] tool against Iran. My question to you is exactly this:
[00:08:48] if the Trump administration decides to use
[00:08:51] powerful and strong bombs
[00:08:53] against
[00:08:56] its facilities, will Iran consider
[00:08:59] this a red line? That is, will
[00:09:03] it consider it a kind of
[00:09:06] fundamental nuclear war and respond accordingly?
[00:09:09] And is it possible that the scope
[00:09:12] will extend to Europe and other countries or not?
[00:09:15] Thank you. You stated a simple question in a very complex
[00:09:19] way. Look, any aggression against Iran,
[00:09:23] any military aggression against Iran with any
[00:09:27] tool that occurs will be met with our
[00:09:29] powerful, immediate, and comprehensive
[00:09:33] reaction. The decision of how
[00:09:36] and in what form and manner
[00:09:39] rests with our defenders.
[00:09:42] It rests with those who are authorized
[00:09:46] in this regard, and the necessary predictions
[00:09:50] have been made well, thank God.
[00:09:53] Well, I am
[00:09:55] a political
[00:09:59] Hello. Peace be upon you. An Iraqi
[00:10:03] parliamentarian announced that the closure
[00:10:07] of the country's borders with Iran was not solely
[00:10:10] an internal decision and was carried out
[00:10:14] due to direct pressure and threats from America.
[00:10:17] I wanted to know Tehran's reaction
[00:10:19] to these positions.
[00:10:22] We have said before to us
[00:10:25] that America uses every tool
[00:10:29] to damage Iran's relations with its neighbors.
[00:10:32] And essentially, regardless of the effectiveness
[00:10:35] of these actions by America,
[00:10:39] one of their clear goals is to disrupt
[00:10:43] the friendly relations between Iran and its neighboring countries.
[00:10:46] Americans know very well that there are strong
[00:10:49] ties between the people of
[00:10:53] Iran and the people
[00:10:55] of neighboring countries, and with these actions, they cannot break
[00:10:58] these ties. The governments
[00:11:01] of the region are also aware
[00:11:04] of these developments. We will make every effort,
[00:11:07] and we know that this understanding
[00:11:11] also exists in neighboring countries that we should
[00:11:14] not allow
[00:11:18] the pressures of actors outside the region
[00:11:22] to cause disruption
[00:11:25] in the economic, commercial, and popular
[00:11:28] interactions between Iran and its neighbors. Everyone knows
[00:11:32] that we are permanent neighbors. Americans
[00:11:35] come and go in various
[00:11:38] forms, but Iran
[00:11:42] and its neighbors must live together forever. Please also
[00:11:45] introduce the contemporary
[00:11:48] economy. Mr. Baghaei, hello, good
[00:11:51] time. Given the arrival of the cold season
[00:11:55] and considering that we always imported part of the required
[00:11:58] gas from neighboring countries during peak consumption, what
[00:12:02] consultations has the Ministry of Foreign Affairs held with gas exporting
[00:12:06] countries to Iran or issue, regardless
[00:12:09] of the season or temperature, is one of the constant
[00:12:13] agendas of our consultations with neighbors, because you should always
[00:12:17] make the necessary predictions in advance
[00:12:20] for energy
[00:12:23] trade
[00:12:25] in various sectors. This is one of the
[00:12:29] issues that will also be discussed during Dr. Araqchi's
[00:12:33] recent visit to Turkmenistan with other relevant
[00:12:36] authorities. We are also consulting with neighboring
[00:12:40] countries in this regard.
[00:12:43] Phoenix. Hello, sir, don't be tired. Excuse me, I
[00:12:47] have two questions. One is what is the main
[00:12:50] difference between Iran and America. You said
[00:12:53] they don't talk about nuclear negotiations.
[00:12:57] So what are the issues now? Secondly,
[00:13:00] after the negotiations between Iran and America
[00:13:03] after the American elections, will Iran continue
[00:13:07] negotiations with America or not? And then a small
[00:13:10] question, if you like. The Omani foreign minister
[00:13:14] traveled to China today. Does China play a
[00:13:18] role in the ceasefire, negotiations, and agreement between
[00:13:21] Iran and America? No, thank
[00:13:27] you.
[00:13:30] The main difference goes back to America's approach.
[00:13:33] America must first prove
[00:13:36] that it fundamentally
[00:13:40] accepts diplomacy
[00:13:42] in its conventional sense and is committed
[00:13:46] to it. A fundamental problem
[00:13:50] in the interactions between Iran and America
[00:13:52] is that America
[00:13:54] constantly rejects diplomacy and negotiation,
[00:13:58] and this makes any
[00:14:01] dialogue difficult because any
[00:14:05] interaction requires a minimum of trust.
[00:14:08] There is absolutely no trust between Iran and America.
[00:14:12] When I speak of trust here,
[00:14:16] I mean that
[00:14:18] you should at least have a relative assurance
[00:14:21] that after two or three weeks, the other party
[00:14:25] will not tear up its own signature. Such a thing does not exist.
[00:14:29] Regarding the issues,
[00:14:32] the main point is that the other
[00:14:36] side has violated the fundamental rights
[00:14:39] of Iranians. It has imposed sanctions. In these
[00:14:42] past four or five months, they have, in their
[00:14:46] own words, imposed a siege against Iran. Well, they must
[00:14:48] lift these. You cannot
[00:14:52] maintain these absolutely and then expect
[00:14:56] Iran to enter another stage
[00:14:59] of negotiations on other issues. This all
[00:15:03] depends on America. America must reconsider
[00:15:07] its approach to the principle
[00:15:10] of diplomacy in order
[00:15:13] to make progress in a negotiating
[00:15:17] process possible. Regarding
[00:15:20] the nuclear issue, as I said, we have
[00:15:23] not reached that stage yet.
[00:15:27] Because as long as Iran's demands are
[00:15:31] not met,
[00:15:33] it is not logically possible for us to enter
[00:15:38] the stage of discussions on other issues. Regarding
[00:15:41] Oman's visit to
[00:15:45] China, well, this is certainly
[00:15:48] a blessed bilateral decision.
[00:15:51] The reciprocal visits between different countries,
[00:15:55] our friendly Oman, has always
[00:15:58] tried in our region to help
[00:16:02] establish peace and
[00:16:04] stability. We are sorry
[00:16:10] that Oman's efforts
[00:16:13] for mediation
[00:16:17] were met with America's ingratitude.
[00:16:19] Certainly,
[00:16:22] dialogue between Oman and China,
[00:16:25] as two important countries,
[00:16:28] two countries that have common interests
[00:16:32] in preserving stability and security in the
[00:16:35] in the Persian Gulf, and the Strait of Hormuz,
[00:16:39] will certainly be useful discussions. I have
[00:16:42] two more questions for you. One of them will
[00:16:46] be popular questions, which we promised every
[00:16:50] week, if my colleague would like to ask
[00:16:54] a popular question. In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. Hello, and please explain
[00:16:57] that this is it. Yes, yes. Today we went to
[00:17:01] public relations, and the question that was
[00:17:05] repeated among the public
[00:17:07] contacts with the Public Relations Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
[00:17:11] is now presented to you. The question is: Given the continued
[00:17:15] threats of America and the Zionist regime against
[00:17:18] Iran, and considering the experience we had
[00:17:21] in the 40-day war, where the territory and facilities
[00:17:25] of the southern Persian Gulf countries were widely used
[00:17:28] against Iran and Iran's interests, have these countries
[00:17:32] given any guarantees that they will not allow
[00:17:35] such abuses to be repeated in the future? And if such
[00:17:51] an event occurs, what will be the reaction
[00:17:55] of the Islamic Republic of Iran?
[00:17:59] In the name of God, the Light
[00:18:01] of Lights. In the name of God,
[00:18:04] the Light upon
[00:18:08] God. God
[00:18:10] is the Greatest.
[00:18:13] God is the Greatest.
[00:18:17] God
[00:18:21] is the Greatest.
[00:18:24] I bear witness that there is no
[00:18:26] god but God.
[00:18:31] I bear witness that there is no
[00:18:34] god but God.
[00:18:41] I bear witness that Muhammad
[00:18:44] is the Messenger of God.
[00:18:49] I bear witness that Muhammad
[00:18:53] is the Messenger
[00:18:55] of God.
[00:19:01] I bear witness that Ali is the Wali
[00:19:05] of God.
[00:19:10] God. I bear witness that Ali
[00:19:14] is the Hujjah
[00:19:15] of God.
[00:19:25] prayer.
[00:19:30] prayer.
[00:19:41] salvation.
[00:19:59] Hasten to
[00:20:03] the best of deeds.
[00:20:07] Hasten to
[00:20:11] the best
[00:20:13] of deeds.
[00:20:16] God is the Greatest.
[00:20:20] God
[00:20:25] is the Greatest.
[00:20:27] There is no god
[00:20:29] but God.
[00:20:35] There is no god but God.
[00:21:10] I'm a reporter from the New York Times, can I talk to you about
[00:21:13] about about about politics? I'm in Michigan, a crucial state for control
[00:21:17] of Congress in the upcoming mid-terms. and I'm trying to talk to
[00:21:20] young men here about their politics. two years ago they
[00:21:24] swung hard for Donald Trump, but now
[00:21:27] polls say that young voters are the most likely to be upset about
[00:21:31] the economy and the war in Iran. I think I voted Trump. Yep, I
[00:21:34] would take that back. Can I ask you how you voted in that election? Yeah, I, I voted for
[00:21:38] Trump. Where's your head at now with with
[00:21:42] a several month conflict with Iran now that is is raising gas
[00:21:45] prices. We have US servicemen who I believe are are kind of needlessly
[00:21:49] dying in this conflict. those kind of broken promises are going to stick in the mind of lot of
[00:21:52] voters. you voted for President Trump in 2024, yep. how are you seeing
[00:21:56] president Trump now? you doesn't worry about people like us. he
[00:22:00] makes us look foolish. i think truly in interviews and in the public
[00:22:04] eye, like we just look stupid when he represents us.
[00:22:07] nash is 20, and like many of the young people we talk to, he really doesn't
[00:22:11] like the war in Iran or Israel's war in
[00:22:13] Gaza. we're funding a country that
[00:22:16] murders thousands of children. think that we should stop.
[00:22:20] bowing down to Israel and worry more about people here, take a
[00:22:23] grocery bill from 2020, 2018,
[00:22:26] and same bills three times cost now, so that hurts.
[00:22:30] nearly 90% of young people disapprove of Trump's handling of the cost of
[00:22:34] living. Trump, of course, is not a ballot, but the mid-terms
[00:22:39] referendum on his
[00:22:40] presence.
[00:25:25] Today, before the start of the open session of
[00:25:29] the Islamic Consultative Assembly, we had a meeting of the presiding
[00:25:33] board with the honorable Speaker and other members
[00:25:36] of the presiding board. In addition to issues related to
[00:25:40] the Parliament, the demands of the people in various
[00:25:44] fields were followed up and examined, including
[00:25:47] the chaotic car market and the issue of paying
[00:26:02] attention to the extent was discussed and reviewed.
[00:26:06] If you are looking for an end to this war and a rational
[00:26:09] withdrawal from it, you must accept Iran's arrangements
[00:26:12] for the Strait of Hormuz and fully implement
[00:26:16] the conditions of the Islamic
[00:26:18] Republic of Iran.
[00:26:24] Continued consideration of the report of the National
[00:26:27] Security and Foreign Policy Commission regarding the plan
[00:26:30] to counter foreign
[00:26:32] infiltration. Article 20. 7 is read as follows:
[00:26:36] Activities in cyberspace and cultural fields, including
[00:26:39] the production or direction of films,
[00:26:43] series, documentaries, and theater, if,
[00:26:47] according to the documents provided by the officer,
[00:26:50] they are under the support, supervision, guidance, training,
[00:26:54] or leadership of a foreign agent, will result
[00:26:57] in 6 months to 5
[00:26:59] years of deprivation of social services.
[00:27:04] Making any film is not a crime. Making any
[00:27:08] play is not a crime. Holding any
[00:27:12] conference is not a crime. Holding any course is not
[00:27:15] a crime, unless it is under
[00:27:19] the support, guidance,
[00:27:21] sponsorship, and leadership of a
[00:27:25] foreign agent and in line with the infiltration of this
[00:27:28] action. I agree that restrictions will be created
[00:27:32] compared to before. I have no doubt about that.
[00:27:36] But that restriction
[00:27:38] that is within the framework, meaning
[00:27:42] foreign infiltration, with foreign
[00:27:45] management, and with knowledge,
[00:27:49] let there be no misunderstanding. We have always been
[00:27:53] supporters of all our dear
[00:27:56] ones in the fields of film, series,
[00:28:00] theater, artists, and writers, and everyone, and we
[00:28:04] will continue to be.
[00:28:10] The law allowed the government 3
[00:28:14] months. Now, for 8 months,
[00:28:17] the country has been at war, and it doesn't
[00:28:21] have an intelligence minister. Well, regarding the intelligence
[00:28:24] minister and according to Article 135 of the Constitution, the honorable
[00:28:27] president had 3 months to do so, but he also
[00:28:31] got 45 days from August 19 to October 4
[00:28:35] based on the exemption that was granted. However,
[00:28:39] today, more than a month has passed since the introduction
[00:28:42] period, and this issue was also raised
[00:28:46] in the presiding board's discussions. Given the process that has taken
[00:28:49] place, I think that, God willing, the desired person will be finalized
[00:28:52] soon and will be introduced to the Parliament
[00:28:56] for the vote of confidence
[00:28:57] procedures.
[00:30:25] Good time, at 12 o'clock, another part of the news.
[00:30:29] The head of the Judicial and Legal Commission of the Parliament
[00:30:33] announced the plan to amend the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[00:30:37] Based on this amendment, the presence of a lawyer
[00:30:41] in the preliminary investigation
[00:30:44] stage will be mandatory at the request of the client.
[00:30:47] If, for any reason, they do not provide
[00:30:50] this possibility for a lawyer to be present
[00:30:54] during the preliminary investigations before the judicial officer,
[00:30:57] all those investigations that have been carried out will not be valid.