KAN11 — -
20261105 155500 UTC
692 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:40] Good evening to you, this is what awaits us here in the recommendations at Beit Hanisim
[00:00:44] are coming to an end soon, in the Eisenkot bloc, they have already marked
[00:00:48] the next goal, the appointment of a new Speaker of the Knesset, already next
[00:00:51] Tuesday, we will have all the details, since the expenses
[00:00:55] of the elections were issued, there are not a few voices calling for unity between the two
[00:00:58] blocs, what is the chance of that?
[00:01:20] of the Republicans in the US elections? It depends on who
[00:01:23] you ask. President JD Vance's survey for AP, alongside
[00:01:27] the war in Iran and the cost of living, indicates that
[00:01:30] Trump's supporters abandoned the party and are demanding to change relations with
[00:01:33] Israel. Vance may run for president in two years
[00:01:37] and the fact that Israel is becoming an electoral problem even among
[00:01:40] Republicans is a warning sign for our national
[00:01:43] security. The question is how to maintain the alliance with the United States,
[00:01:47] when support for Israel is no longer taken for granted, even
[00:01:50] in the party that was considered our closest
[00:02:00] Unexploded ordnance (UXO) are a danger to life. They can look like ammunition shards
[00:02:04] or shell fragments. They can be very small,
[00:02:07] old or new, or even look like a harmless
[00:02:11] piece of metal. But it is important to understand that any UXO
[00:02:15] of any size and shape can explode and endanger
[00:02:18] lives. Therefore, it is important that we pay attention and act
[00:02:21] with vigilance wherever we are. If
[00:02:24] you encounter UXO or any suspicious object, do not
[00:02:28] touch it under any circumstances. So what do you do? Stay away
[00:02:32] from the area, keep curious people away, call
[00:02:35] 100 to the Israel Police, provide the most accurate location
[00:02:39] possible, and act according to the instructions of the
[00:02:41] security forces. UXO are a danger to life, do not
[00:02:45] touch them and do not
[00:02:46] approach them.
[00:03:24] more or less said he wouldn't allow it. He wrote A
[00:03:26] that the regular one will be disconnected soon. With
[00:03:30] this claim, but this is what Hanah writes, he says, the regular one is that the Speaker of the Knesset is replaced
[00:03:34] at the time of the government's swearing-in, the unusual one,
[00:03:37] if a document is submitted, with at least 61 signatures of Knesset
[00:03:40] members, and in this case, I will convene the plenum within a week, so
[00:03:44] within a week, we are already saying not
[00:03:46] on the day, try to explain what the difference is between the letters we saw
[00:03:50] the parties sending that they intend to replace
[00:03:53] Mirohana and his request for a joint letter with
[00:03:57] 61 signatures, as if an attempt to say, look, they
[00:04:01] are cooperating with the Arab parties. I think so, this is really a matter of
[00:04:04] semantics. I must tell you that I reviewed the legal opinion of the Knesset's legal counsel, the last legal
[00:04:08] opinion on this issue, by the way, is by the same legal counsel, Sagitt Afik
[00:04:11] from 2022. A legal opinion that states
[00:04:15] that in at least 14 Knessets
[00:04:18] in the past, at the time of the Knesset's swearing-in, the Speaker was already elected, contrary to what
[00:04:21] Hanah says, and B
[00:04:25] the first Jewish demand in that a majority of Knesset members are required to request it, not with
[00:04:29] a joint document. Yes, ah, will
[00:04:32] the members of the change bloc eventually agree to sign a joint
[00:04:36] document with the Arabs, if there is such a demand from Hanah? The answer, in my opinion, is yes. Who needs to request
[00:04:39] the demand? Is it the legal advisor to the Knesset or the current Speaker
[00:04:43] currently asking for it? Will
[00:04:47] there be intervention from the legal advisor? They might turn to her, if it comes to that, I don't think so.
[00:04:50] I think what will happen is that they
[00:04:53] will submit signatures, not necessarily on
[00:04:57] the same paper, but each faction will submit its signatures. They will submit them
[00:05:01] to the Speaker of the Knesset, and then count a week
[00:05:04] from that date, which will probably be more or less on Tuesday,
[00:05:08] and there will be the election of the Speaker of the Knesset, and this is without us referring to the appeal on
[00:05:19] of United Torah Judaism to recommend him to the president. This did not happen. Is
[00:05:22] there a hint here perhaps of some move with the
[00:05:26] change bloc or are they playing open in United Torah Judaism
[00:05:29] waiting to see what they can get from everyone? First of all, United Torah Judaism
[00:05:33] certainly does not close the door. There is some
[00:05:36] educational act here from the perspective of the Haredi leadership in what we
[00:05:40] see here in the non-recommendation of Netanyahu.
[00:05:44] That after this whole event of the blocs of
[00:05:47] the Haredi ideology was a bit
[00:05:50] of a vacuum in terms of right and left in the last 20 years, it was even
[00:05:53] impossible to imagine a situation where a Haredi rabbi
[00:05:57] would express himself on security issues, on such
[00:06:01] issues, and when there is this vacuum and naturally also the partnership with
[00:06:05] Netanyahu greatly contributed to the Haredim, so there was this rapprochement. From this point of view,
[00:06:08] Rabbi Lando, the leader of Degel HaTorah, Rabbi Lando, came and said already
[00:06:12] a few months ago, we are not part of any bloc, we are only
[00:06:16] the bloc of the world of Torah, as he put it. From this point of view, there is now time
[00:06:20] to settle the score, and not to show in winter, so to remember
[00:06:24] as the Haredi public, as the United Torah Judaism party, only care about
[00:06:27] our event, about the event of enlistment, about the event of budgets, that's
[00:06:31] where we want to be, and we don't see ourselves as part of some larger
[00:06:35] story of blocs or of right and left. This now
[00:06:38] closes this circle of what Rabbi Lando said then. Now, will
[00:06:42] they want to currently from what I understand, no real
[00:06:46] overtures were made. What did the alliance that called itself the alliance
[00:06:49] of the servants say? It won't be that simple
[00:06:53] to go back on everything that connected them during
[00:06:56] the last elections. But you can always abstain from being
[00:07:00] outside, abstain. And what is certain is that the Haredim benefit
[00:07:03] greatly from this situation where there is some ambiguity. For example, Liberman does not say
[00:07:07] that I will not sit with the Haredim. From this point of view, after all
[00:07:10] the campaigns of the servants throughout the election
[00:07:14] campaign that we heard about this event of
[00:07:16] Haredi evasion, finally to say, we are suddenly
[00:07:20] being courted, suddenly it was just not real. From this point
[00:07:23] of view, the Haredim benefit even if there is no current appeal. They are returning
[00:07:27] to be courted, returning to be courted. And even if there is an
[00:07:31] Well, suspicions of foreign intervention in the elections raise many questions
[00:07:41] clarify. We are all confused. Which version of Zini should the Israeli public
[00:07:45] adopt? The Zini who sits next to Solberg
[00:07:48] and the Legal Adviser and agrees to the claim that the suspicions do not
[00:07:51] challenge the election results, or the Zini who, according to the report
[00:07:55] of the "Mitzgel" newspaper, estimates the intervention at 100
[00:07:58] million shekels? So what is true? Yes,
[00:08:02] look, first of all, it's very difficult to clarify when the head of the Shin Bet's statements
[00:08:05] keep changing. I can already count about five or
[00:08:09] six times, and in this I can clarify. And to the extent
[00:08:13] that there is evidence, I can clarify, but it's very difficult
[00:08:17] when a person who is responsible for the investigation,
[00:08:20] at least for now, is making such a mess himself. So
[00:08:23] let's start from the beginning. And by the way, there's also a professional meeting
[00:08:27] today for the first time between the Shin Bet working on a joint
[00:08:31] investigation. This event actually starts
[00:08:34] two weeks before the elections. There is information about some money, hundreds
[00:08:38] of thousands of shekels, reaching a Knesset member. They think
[00:08:41] it's related to the elections,
[00:08:44] cash, allegedly foreign funding. He says it's not related
[00:08:48] to this event at all, for some, if
[00:08:51] if it's related to it, then a source says that it's for some
[00:08:55] organization he's establishing. From there, the investigation
[00:08:58] begins. And when this information is presented to Zini, he also says
[00:09:01] on election day itself, that everything is going
[00:09:04] smoothly, that the integrity of the elections is maintained, that the elections are fair in an inspiring
[00:09:08] way. But then, as we
[00:09:11] progress, we see that in internal meetings, he
[00:09:14] talks about a much larger phenomenon. You mentioned
[00:09:18] Amit Segal's report yesterday that Zini tells Solberg it's up to
[00:09:22] 100 million shekels, fuel cards for huge sums,
[00:09:25] phenomena that came to his attention, according to him, already
[00:09:28] before the elections and evidence that came during
[00:09:31] the elections, even until noon. But we remember on that day that Zini said
[00:09:35] completely different things. So here, a question really arises regarding
[00:09:38] I have to ask you Roie the bottom line, is there a
[00:09:42] contradiction between his versions or can it also be
[00:09:46] a development in the investigation?
[00:09:49] So according to what he says, there is no contradiction here in terms of the information he received, because he
[00:09:53] says that these things were received before the elections and during the elections he
[00:09:56] allegedly received supporting information. What evidence is there and what evidence is there
[00:10:00] currently? According to everything we understand, 100 sources
[00:10:03] who are familiar with the evidence, a series of professional bodies who
[00:10:07] are exposed to this matter, there is evidence regarding that
[00:10:10] financial offense that... But
[00:10:28] there is no connection and also in terms of the amounts
[00:10:31] and scope, for example today a report in the country about
[00:10:33] that they already checked the purchases of
[00:10:37] fuel cards at gas companies,
[00:10:41] they did not find any unusual purchases there and even those who are aware
[00:10:45] who did purchase fuel cards to transport
[00:10:48] voters, legal, not legal, where does it
[00:10:51] stand, it stands in the areas of election law, but
[00:10:55] from here to stealing elections in droves, I don't see
[00:10:58] at least from the evidence that is available to us, where
[00:11:01] we see those 100 million shekels for which there is no evidence currently
[00:11:05] at least from those who are exposed to the investigation material, perhaps today there is
[00:11:08] a meeting where the head of the Shin Bet and the police will certainly
[00:11:20] started. On Tuesday, this event of the appeal on the election results
[00:11:24] as a result of foreign
[00:11:26] claimed by Likud and also David Zini,
[00:11:30] is this something that will be
[00:11:34] we see the Likud appealing to the High Court of Justice, the same High Court of Justice they want to reform? I am
[00:11:37] skeptical right now, not that it is unreasonable as a matter of principle, but
[00:11:41] in the end, the Likud did take a step back at the last minute and abstained
[00:11:45] from voting on the election results, so that they were approved
[00:11:48] without them. The majority of the coalition in the plenum
[00:11:51] of the Election Committee could have chosen not to approve them and really plunged
[00:11:55] us into this constitutional crisis.
[00:11:58] I think it was meant to serve as delegitimization for the scenario
[00:12:01] of forming a caretaker government based on the Arab
[00:12:05] parties. It is definitely present, it is definitely something that will be
[00:12:08] mentioned. By the way, truthfully, of course we want a thorough
[00:12:12] investigation. Yes. The question, you know,
[00:12:15] the question is whether it serves as delegitimization of the election results, and here
[00:12:18] Judge Solberg and also the President during the rounds of recommendations state
[00:12:22] very clearly. This is not something that will. It will be interesting to see
[00:12:25] this because today they are meeting and Zini is supposed to bring the evidence and it will be interesting to see
[00:12:29] where this goes, but you said that maybe it is also related
[00:12:32] to the delegitimization of the Arab parties and today we saw them at the President's Residence
[00:12:36] recommending Gadi Eisenkot and you know who can sit in that chair
[00:12:39] in our place. He did it well today. The President, by the way,
[00:12:43] every round of recommendations, the Presidents excel as political interviewers
[00:12:47] and they really ask the question that is clear to every presenter who has
[00:12:51] a candidate from the Arab lists this is the question they ask. So here.
[00:12:56] Why not say and answer the question of Hamas
[00:13:00] being a terrorist organization and take that off their back
[00:13:03] in quotes and give an answer to the skeptics and really
[00:13:06] create here some possibility for a political
[00:13:09] move fascinating in my opinion. I have a clear
[00:13:13] answer but leave me this space to be
[00:13:16] a bridge to influence the other side and leave me also
[00:13:20] space to protect myself and my family.
[00:13:24] Yes. This is already being used, by the way, immediately after
[00:13:27] Mansour Abbas' statement that he is not willing
[00:13:31] to reiterate that Hamas is a terrorist organization, he twists and turns in a long answer, yes
[00:13:35] he says it needs to disarm and yes he says it is dangerous for him, as we have heard
[00:13:38] him say many times, as you said, every interviewer asks him at the beginning
[00:13:42] of every interview. Immediately after that, the religious
[00:13:46] Zionist camp issues a statement saying, so we cannot rely on someone
[00:13:49] who is not willing to say that Hamas is a terrorist organization, and we call
[00:13:53] for Jewish Zionist unity.
[00:13:56] So, it is clear that these statements serve the narrative of those who
[00:14:00] want to call for unity or even just to thwart
[00:14:03] the possibility. We will also talk about how logical and close
[00:14:19] that took place yesterday in the United States, where a blue Democratic wave colored both
[00:14:23] houses of Congress, the Senate and the House.
[00:14:27] Hello,
[00:14:30] hello, Keren, listen, as Israelis, we understood that it's not
[00:14:34] and if we didn't fully understand it
[00:14:37] then, J.D. Vance's tweet explained it very well
[00:14:41] that Israel is a kind of electoral burden, a kind of red
[00:14:44] flag also for
[00:14:46] the Republicans.
[00:14:49] Yes, and it shouldn't be very new that there are some in the Republican
[00:14:53] wing who see. At least for decision-makers in Israel, it should definitely concern them.
[00:15:02] What's interesting is J.D. Vance, who represents
[00:15:06] the more isolationist line within the Republican leadership.
[00:15:09] He doesn't necessarily agree with President Trump on everything on this
[00:15:13] issue, but in a rather bold move yesterday he says: I will tell you
[00:15:16] who is to blame for us losing the elections yesterday, and he publishes
[00:15:20] a post in which he writes, among other things, that the pollster asked the voters,
[00:15:24] we will see this in a moment on the screen, what
[00:15:26] will make them come back to us, and the four leading answers, which were almost all
[00:15:30] the responses, were ending the war in Iran, focusing on the cost of living,
[00:15:33] putting America first and changing our relations
[00:15:37] with Israel. In other words, says the Vice President of the United
[00:15:40] States, the war in Iran and also the relations with Israel, and also the fact
[00:15:44] that it's no longer America First, these things
[00:15:47] are what are bothering us electorally, therefore everyone
[00:15:51] will draw their own conclusions from this, what to do about the future, how
[00:15:55] to proceed from there, does this mean a break or
[00:15:58] a distancing of the Republicans from Israel? A day before
[00:16:01] the elections, on election day itself, we saw Trump hinting that soon
[00:16:05] we won't need to spend 3.8 billion
[00:16:07] dollars a year on Israel. Does this mean stopping the war
[00:16:11] in Iran before Israel would want to do it? That could also be.
[00:16:15] These are definitely directions that will need to be on the table. President
[00:16:18] Trump, by the way, does not necessarily adopt what Vance has
[00:16:22] to say about Israel, but on the Iranian issue he largely agrees. Let's hear a clip.
[00:17:07] The United States, there is serious concern among the Israeli public that we
[00:17:11] are on a fast track to losing our alliance with
[00:17:14] the Americans. How much of this is fate, or do we still have
[00:17:17] something to do to change it? Of course, there is something to do, but in order
[00:17:21] for us to do it, we first need
[00:17:23] to understand that there are also aspects
[00:17:27] related to Israel that are involved. There are of course things that are not related to us. The United
[00:17:30] States is undergoing a tectonic political change.
[00:17:33] Ah, for those who find it difficult to understand this,
[00:17:36] perhaps we should look at ourselves and see what is happening
[00:17:40] here in the tension between the blocs. Ah,
[00:17:44] perhaps we should mention an interesting detail, the data is accumulating in the United
[00:17:47] States. The voter turnout among Republicans was very, very high, simply part of the king
[00:17:51] voted for Democratic candidates as a protest vote against the President
[00:17:54] and his policy, and these things
[00:17:57] happened there
[00:18:00] in a very significant way.
[00:18:04] These processes are long. First of all, Israel has unfortunately been on a collision course
[00:18:07] with the Democratic Party for years, and in recent
[00:18:11] years, despite a strong relationship between Prime Minister Netanyahu
[00:18:15] and President Trump, it has been increasingly on a collision course with
[00:18:19] the Republican Party as well. And I think that Israeli
[00:18:21] unwillingness to acknowledge
[00:18:25] that these things are happening and to ask if there are actions we
[00:18:28] can take to alleviate this tension, to reduce it,
[00:18:32] perhaps even to do things that would not cost us much but would be very significant
[00:18:36] there for that in recent
[00:18:39] years, especially in the last two years, I think Israeli
[00:18:42] policy has been so forceful, so
[00:18:46] confrontational, almost even celebrating these phenomena and saying, you see,
[00:18:49] everyone is against us, all we have left is to be ourselves and super Sparta
[00:18:53] from here and Bitcoin in the opposite direction, as if Netanyahu uses this to
[00:18:57] strengthen his effort. This is very very dangerous, because if this were to happen
[00:19:00] God forbid, and there would be an American sanctions regime against us, we certainly
[00:19:04] would not solve it with Bitcoin.
[00:19:15] that we will really become a kind of enemy of the United States without a veto
[00:19:19] at the UN, or is it still treatable and we can
[00:19:23] go back to finding the people in the center of both
[00:19:25] parties? Certainly, there is no need
[00:19:29] to panic too much. Israel is not becoming an enemy and certainly
[00:19:32] not a country in direct frontal conflict with the United
[00:19:36] States. The things that are on the table. There, from the Republicans' side, and J.D. Vance tweeted this
[00:19:40] yesterday, is whether support for Israel is an asset for the United States or
[00:19:43] not. The United States does not support many countries that are its allies
[00:19:47] or certainly not its darlings. All of Europe will experience turmoil with
[00:19:51] American policy if J.D. Vance continues with his policy and dismantles NATO, all
[00:19:54] of Europe will feel this. This doesn't mean they are enemies of the United States, it just means they are not
[00:19:58] enjoying special treatment. And it could be that Israel will stop enjoying special treatment
[00:20:01] from the Republican side. Regarding the Democrats, it's more complicated, because among
[00:20:05] the Democrats there is a large public. Among them are those who criticize
[00:20:08] Israeli security policies, especially criticizing
[00:20:11] actions that happen in Judea and Samaria, settler violence,
[00:20:15] Jewish terrorism, expansion that is within the bounds of normalcy, but there is
[00:20:19] also an audience in the Democratic Party in the United States, unfortunately, it is certainly larger
[00:20:22] than we want, it is not too large, there is no need to panic too much,
[00:20:26] who questions Israel's right to exist as a nation-state of the Jewish people.
[00:20:30] Abdul Al-Sayed, who was elected as a senator in Michigan, is perhaps the most serious
[00:20:33] of them. There are a few others like him in this regard.
[00:20:36] This is the danger. And this process did not exist at all 10 years ago.
[00:20:40] Today it even has representation in the Senate. And if Israel continues
[00:20:43] this path and continues to be in constant friction with the American public and does not look
[00:20:47] for ways in which the American public remembers that
[00:20:51] there are good things in Israel, that Israel is a democratic country,
[00:20:54] an open country where everyone has
[00:20:57] rights, where Arabs can go and vote and get
[00:21:01] 19 seats, and no one will say they have no
[00:21:04] legitimacy, phenomena that we are seeing now, there are things in Israeli policy
[00:21:08] that affect this. There is still a common basis of values and
[00:21:11] ideas between us and the American population, only we are
[00:21:15] eroding them, unfortunately, almost intentionally.
[00:21:18] Yes, I want to move with you from there to the results. To connect the
[00:21:22] election results and ask in the most simplistic way possible, in relation
[00:21:26] to Trump's personality that we were all exposed to, do these results
[00:21:29] bring us closer to a confrontation with Iran or do they distance
[00:21:32] us, if we also consider what J.D. Vance
[00:21:36] said? How do you see it? Yes, that's a very
[00:21:39] good question. I find it difficult to answer it honestly, as someone who is very, very
[00:21:43] Afkhafakh, I think first of all, the fact
[00:21:46] that the Vice President came out with that very, very blunt tweet, it should be said, it
[00:21:50] wasn't only blunt against Israel, yes, he first criticizes the war with
[00:21:54] Iran and only then blames Israel in this matter, because I think he knows
[00:21:58] that the decision to go to war was not only the result of Israeli pressure, it
[00:22:02] was primarily a decision by President Trump, and President Trump himself says that he
[00:22:06] agrees with Vance that it had a political cost, but he would do it again, and he does not place
[00:22:09] the blame on Israel, but there is no doubt
[00:22:12] that the war with Iran its consequences on
[00:22:16] the energy market, on the cost of living in the United States, hurt President Trump's voters,
[00:22:20] and also other things hurt. But how easy it is to blame this on something
[00:22:23] external and certainly also to blame Israel on the way. I
[00:22:27] estimate, and it is possible that I will be proven wrong tomorrow morning, that this
[00:22:30] distances the desire or appetite that President
[00:22:33] Trump has to go out and attack Iran right now, especially something
[00:22:37] that would be seen as an attack that does not really solve the problem. Yes, we are talking about
[00:22:41] a short attack of three days. I think that this will only further
[00:22:44] increase the frustration among his voters, and it seems to me that Vice President
[00:22:48] Vance does not explicitly
[00:22:50] say it, but he is essentially telling the President, "I should be your successor, I should be
[00:22:54] the one who wins the next elections."
[00:22:57] You know, Trump, thinks about Trump and his
[00:23:00] legacy and cares less about how Jay Vance
[00:23:03] fares in the elections.
[00:23:06] Yes, one thing to remember about Trump that is relevant to us, already on that evening,
[00:23:10] despite the very, very painful defeat, President Trump accepted the election results
[00:23:14] in the United States. This is the same President who six years ago
[00:23:17] caused the January 6th
[00:23:20] events, and I think we need to talk about that for a moment as well. We are in a very,
[00:23:24] very sharp political reality. I don't want to go into the details that I don't fully understand,
[00:23:27] but there is a rule of law in Israel, there are processes in the State of Israel, there is a chairman
[00:23:31] of the election committee who determined that the elections were fair. Next
[00:23:34] Tuesday, the Knesset is supposed to be sworn in, and I very much hope that will happen. Perhaps it is worth
[00:23:37] learning from the way President Trump, the same President we are talking about, relates to the elections
[00:23:41] in the United States. Well, perhaps he also learned something from the Capitol event that happened
[00:23:56] about the fact that on election day, Trump talked about military
[00:24:00] aid to Israel, and that the aid money will stop. The army
[00:24:03] already knows when it will stop, how much? Because we see
[00:24:06] publications in the American press saying that it can't be stopped at all.
[00:24:10] Israel, as they say, has already opened a credit line with 10 billion dollars
[00:24:14] and has ordered equipment, so how will they close
[00:24:17] that? Yes, it needs to be said honestly. This statement
[00:24:20] by President Trump on Election Day in the United States caught senior IDF officials, the Ministry
[00:24:24] of Defense, and the Ministry of Finance completely by surprise, especially since there are
[00:24:27] already contracts that have been signed for the years
[00:24:30] to come. The current memorandum of understanding is until
[00:24:33] 2028, that is its current term.
[00:24:37] Trump said in the statement until the end of the year, meaning there is some
[00:24:40] discrepancy here. And here in Israel, they still don't know what the implications are, because in the end there is
[00:24:44] already an agreement in effect, to cancel it
[00:24:47] requires a decision also from Congress, and therefore there is a situation
[00:24:50] of uncertainty. So yes, it can be said that professional bodies in Israel, both from the Ministry
[00:24:54] of Defense, from the IDF, and from the Ministry of Finance, contacted their counterparts
[00:24:58] in the United States, trying to understand. We need to refer
[00:25:01] to this issue of aid itself, because we are talking about
[00:25:05] a lot of money here, we are talking about a little less than 4
[00:25:09] billion dollars annually, there are already deals that have started,
[00:25:12] including the new helicopters, there are tanker
[00:25:16] aircraft they want to buy, there is the F-35 that Israel always.
[00:25:20] keeps advancing, and therefore there is some problem here that will need to be addressed.
[00:25:24] In any case, what is absolutely clear, the moment
[00:25:27] Americans stop transferring aid money, it will come
[00:25:31] from our money, from the money of the Israeli
[00:25:34] taxpayer, this is almost 500 shekels
[00:25:38] per family. I hope Trump, being Trump, didn't really mean that it
[00:25:42] would end this year, but rather that they planned
[00:26:27] courtesy of
[00:26:29] Beresheet Assisted Living in the Jerusalem Mountains. And now
[00:26:33] on the no-deposit plan.
[00:26:46] The forecast is broadcast courtesy of.
[00:26:49] Beresheet, assisted living in the Jerusalem Mountains, and now
[00:26:53] on the no deposit track. The funniest thing for me
[00:26:55] now is to see how the change bloc suddenly starts flattering the Haredim. You'll soon
[00:26:59] see Liberman posting a story with the marks left on his hand after the phylacteries
[00:27:03] and writing "the most beautiful tattoo there is." In order to legitimize going with
[00:27:06] Eisenkot, the Haredim are already quoting verses from the sources, and the wolf will dwell with
[00:27:10] the lamb, and Godeknop with Gadi Ervatz, and Mansour Kattan
[00:27:51] his weapon and opens fire in our
[00:27:53] direction.
[00:27:56] They are the head, they are guilty, there are many guilty people
[00:27:59] in October 7th, I don't think that the High Court of Justice is one of them.
[00:28:05] I haven't seen such a thing, I haven't heard such stories,
[00:28:09] real time, soon,
[00:28:12] on Kan 11 and on Kan
[00:28:14] Box.
[00:28:18] The program is broadcast courtesy of,
[00:28:21] a loan, a word of. Caracal, loan it's
[00:28:25] easy.
[00:28:30] Anise kitchens coming soon to you. The Piano
[00:28:33] Festival in Eilat returns December 31st to January
[00:28:37] 2nd
[00:28:37] in Eilat.
[00:28:47] Wow, the most exciting tour guide in the country. Israeli Tourism Month November
[00:28:51] 2026 is back. And this year, a thousand tours across the country
[00:28:54] and in Israel and a variety of experiences and shows for 18 shekels.
[00:29:10] I don't know if it's just me, but in the last week there's a feeling that the Israeli
[00:29:14] public wants a unity government. What's the probability that this
[00:29:17] will happen? And to what extent will our political leaders show flexibility?
[00:29:21] Here's what Prime Minister Benjamin
[00:29:24] Netanyahu said just yesterday. A broad national government led by the Likud
[00:29:28] under my leadership that will include all components of the national bloc and all
[00:29:32] the Zionist parties that wish to join. I said
[00:29:35] this during the election campaign and repeated it just two
[00:29:38] days ago. Currently outside the President's residence there is a demonstration and protest
[00:30:00] for unity is almost self- evident. Especially after everything
[00:30:03] we've been through in recent years, but how do you create unity with someone who casts
[00:30:07] doubt on the election process or the election
[00:30:10] results?
[00:30:13] So first of all, a few things: one, you're right, since the elections, what's called the "unity
[00:30:16] color of Israel" has risen,
[00:30:19] which is public figures, opinion leaders
[00:30:22] and in general, ordinary citizens who call for the establishment of
[00:30:26] such a unity government, but I'll correct you on a small thing, even before the elections they said
[00:30:30] that, I personally have been saying it for three years and. Blue and White of Benny Gantz
[00:30:33] that they ran with, that was our ticket in the elections, meaning it didn't start
[00:30:37] yesterday morning, of course it intensified after the elections due to the election
[00:30:41] results. Now look, there are two ways to look
[00:30:44] at it, I personally see
[00:30:47] unity as a true value in the people of Israel, a value
[00:30:51] regardless of the election results it's a value, that's my
[00:30:54] lesson from October 7th, that's what I think
[00:30:58] needs to happen in the people of Israel so that we don't return
[00:31:01] to events that break us internally as we see
[00:31:05] now, but you can also look at unity at its practical level, at
[00:31:08] partnership. The people of Israel went to vote, these are the results
[00:31:12] it produced, in these results the name. The only
[00:31:15] question, but the only one that needs to be asked, is
[00:31:19] what is right for the State of Israel? What is the interest of
[00:31:22] the State of Israel? What kind of government will be formed here? Given these
[00:31:26] results, it's clear, wait, given these results, it's clear that a unity government
[00:31:30] must be formed because a government that depends on the Haredi parties or the Arab
[00:31:33] parties, is a paralyzed government that cannot deal with the challenges
[00:31:36] and opportunities the country has. Good, I want to ask you, will you, as
[00:31:40] Roy basically says, did not achieve the result
[00:31:43] you hoped for at the ballot box. So why are you against
[00:31:46] a broad unity government and if Netanyahu's
[00:31:50] boycott didn't become an end in itself
[00:31:53] for you, why not consider partnership with this bloc with his
[00:31:57] bloc? Look, first of all, they taught
[00:32:01] me in school to count to 120, not even to
[00:32:04] 100, and in up to 120 they told me
[00:32:07] that 67 is more than 53.
[00:32:10] Now there's some national sport not
[00:32:14] to count some of the votes, not to count the Arabs, not to count those, these
[00:32:18] elections were about one question, can
[00:32:21] Netanyahu and the government of October 7th and the government of draft
[00:32:25] dodging continue or not? It's 67 to
[00:32:28] 53, and therefore from this Tuesday we will start to implement
[00:32:32] this majority in the Knesset, and after that also in forming a government. Now you ask
[00:32:36] me, what's your problem with Netanyahu? Why not sit
[00:32:39] with him in unity? So anyone who says he wants to
[00:32:42] sit in unity with Netanya.
[00:32:45] I suggest to him, I don't know what, to buy a used car from some Tinder
[00:32:49] fraud. The man has been fooling people for
[00:32:52] 15 years.
[00:32:55] Every person he says, how can you believe a person
[00:32:59] who cheated everyone?
[00:33:02] If he cheats 100 more times, then stop
[00:33:04] believing. I want to ask you, but come on, you say
[00:33:08] I don't want to buy a car from someone who is not
[00:33:12] trustworthy, but to buy a car.
[00:33:23] a Palestinian state, it's not that you're taking away the right
[00:33:26] to vote from Arab citizens, but parties that are not
[00:33:30] Zionist in their essence, you prefer them over
[00:33:33] Netanyahu?
[00:33:36] The Joint List is not going to be part of the next government, the next government
[00:33:39] is going to be composed of four main parties, which are Bennett,
[00:33:43] Lieberman, Einzinot and the Democrats.
[00:33:56] I think it's good for the State of Israel to have a government that has right-wingers, left-wingers, religious
[00:34:00] people, secular people, and also Jews and Arabs and yes, I think Netanyahu is
[00:34:04] the problem of the State of Israel, he doesn't recognize the election results, he takes
[00:34:08] us to wars in a chair, he needs to be moved,
[00:34:11] he's been my prime minister since he was 12 years old, yes. If you want
[00:34:15] unity, if you want to get rid of the poison machines, I think
[00:34:18] the way passes through replacing Netanyahu, Roy,
[00:34:22] it's like you hear it from everyone, you can't trust him, who
[00:34:33] yesterday, he didn't talk about a unity government, he said a broad
[00:34:36] government under my leadership, he's not willing to give anything, so why talk about unity
[00:34:40] at all?
[00:34:43] Here, here's what I agree with. With Knesset member Fink, we must say
[00:34:47] now, no, come on, from Tuesday indeed the people
[00:34:50] of Israel, sorry, from Tuesday, ah, indeed the people
[00:34:54] of Israel voted for change, they told
[00:34:57] the existing government we are not satisfied and we want
[00:35:01] to change the government in the State of Israel, only I don't agree with
[00:35:04] the change that he presented, all the leaders of the change
[00:35:08] bloc, except Yair Golan, Bennett, Lapid, Lieberman,
[00:35:11] Gantz, all of them pledged to the Israeli voter
[00:35:15] that they would not form a government with the Arab parties and they would not
[00:35:18] form a government with the Haredi parties, for this, also for this
[00:35:22] they were elected, and if Yai Fink wants to play a numbers game, then 100%.
[00:35:26] Israeli democracy is indeed built of 120 representatives, and indeed there are
[00:35:29] 67 representatives for what he called the change bloc, but if
[00:35:33] we are talking about respecting Israeli democracy, that's perfectly
[00:35:36] fine, and I probably share many things with his
[00:35:39] opinion, but Benjamin Netanyahu received from the Israeli
[00:35:42] public 27 mandates, he... The largest
[00:35:45] party in Israel by a wide margin, and therefore
[00:35:48] this choice of Israeli citizens must also be respected. And now
[00:35:51] that we've played with all the political plumbing, wait, just a second,
[00:35:55] Yiya, just a second, a minute, Yiya, and now, after we've played with all the political
[00:35:59] plumbing, again I ask, what
[00:36:02] is the government needed
[00:36:04] that would be most right for the State of Israel? I believe
[00:36:08] that a minority government of 48 mandates of Gadi Eisenkot
[00:36:12] that depends on the Joint List and Mansour Abbas. That's a government that's
[00:36:16] a disaster for the State of Israel, it's simply a disaster, if that's what they want to do,
[00:36:19] great, I just don't agree. Yiya, you have a minute to answer, no,
[00:36:22] please, Bibi Bibi against unity when he
[00:36:26] wins and for unity when he
[00:36:29] loses, we are not fools, he fooled
[00:36:32] Buzi, Tzipi, Gantz, again Gantz, again I say, in my opinion
[00:36:35] Gadi Eisenkot is not Gantz two, he understands
[00:36:39] who Benjamin Netanyahu is, Lieberman understands who Benjamin Netanyahu is, Benjamin
[00:36:43] Netanyahu and the Qatari agents and whoever was here at the head
[00:36:46] of October 7th must be sent home, we, by the way, will be
[00:36:50] the government of all, we will not run over half the people, we will be the government of the Haredim,
[00:36:53] of the Arabs, of the Jews, my brothers
[00:36:56] from the reserves. Who did not vote for the change bloc will also be their government, that's
[00:37:00] a unity government, there cannot be a unity government with Benjamin
[00:37:04] Netanyahu, when Minister Netanyahu says that Yair
[00:37:07] Golan was dressed on October 7th and Yair
[00:37:10] Netanyahu tweets against everyone and his sister and Dudi Amsalem
[00:37:14] says that the leftists are traitors, it doesn't work like that, we need
[00:37:35] thing, ah, listen, I don't
[00:37:39] understand his perception, I don't understand how he can say that a minority government of
[00:37:42] 48 mandates, that's a unity government, that's a government
[00:37:45] that by definition excludes half the people,
[00:37:48] by definition, the State of Israel is in critical
[00:37:52] days, at a critical time, internally
[00:37:56] and externally, a second ago. The idea with Eyal Holta, he's 100%
[00:37:59] right in everything he says. In these
[00:38:02] days, to think that a government that is
[00:38:05] illegitimate or half the people see as illegitimate
[00:38:09] and has no broad internal legitimacy, will also
[00:38:12] not receive legitimacy in the world, this thing is a disaster for the State of Israel, I very
[00:38:43] effective reports of bombs on planes and ships.
[00:38:47] Noam Goldberg, how widespread is this phenomenon and what is
[00:39:00] from their routes due to anonymous reports of bombs
[00:39:03] on board. This is happening on Wizz Air flights, Lot flights, Finnair
[00:39:07] flights, Ryanair and several other
[00:39:10] airlines. Reports reaching both the civil aviation authorities
[00:39:14] in various cities in Europe and the airlines
[00:39:17] themselves, whether by phone call or email, anonymous
[00:39:21] reports of suspicious objects or bombs that cause these
[00:39:24] planes to be diverted. This is happening, I remind you, after. In recent weeks,
[00:39:28] it seems that this trend, in quotation marks, of bomb threats on planes
[00:39:32] is simply gaining momentum and this is happening as a result of what happened
[00:39:35] with the Flydubai flight, since then we have seen a rise,
[00:39:39] indeed a soaring, literally in the skies, of this disturbing
[00:39:43] phenomenon, it must be said that even before that, it was common practice, in almost every
[00:39:47] airline and certainly in aviation authorities and airports around the world,
[00:39:50] that when such a report comes in, they don't take risks and don't assume that it might
[00:39:54] be a prankster and simply check, whether that means:
[00:39:59] that the passengers are on the ground and they take them out and scan again and check again and look
[00:40:03] at the passengers themselves again, and whether that means diverting flights
[00:40:06] to alternative landing strips and alternative
[00:40:10] airports to land in them to ensure that there is no disturbing
[00:40:13] and dangerous incident, and again we will say this thing has existed forever but
[00:40:17] we are seeing it more intensely in recent weeks, when the day before yesterday it
[00:40:21] expanded not only to the skies but also to the sea, a cruise ship
[00:40:24] received an anonymous report that. There was a bomb
[00:40:28] on board, the authorities in Cyprus scanned the entire area, found
[00:40:32] nothing and decided not to take risks anyway and delayed
[00:40:35] the ship for about seven hours, the Crown Iris of Mano's Ferries
[00:40:38] in Cyprus, they disembarked all 1400 passengers, scanned
[00:40:42] the area and then essentially announced that everything was fine and they could fly.
[00:40:46] This thing is a kind of, problem, because
[00:40:49] on the one hand the authorities want to respond to every report, even anonymous, that there is
[00:40:53] a fear that it is really true. On the other hand, there is a boy-who-cried-wolf
[00:40:56] effect here and perhaps. They will stop responding, then maybe it won't attract
[00:41:00] pranksters, but then they will give up responding
[00:41:03] in a real event situation. What do they do about it? So I do know
[00:41:07] that aviation authorities are trying to activate mechanisms both in terms of cyber
[00:41:10] and in terms of tracking, even OSINT to see if they can find out who these
[00:41:14] pranksters are and if they can stop them before they call or understand that it's
[00:41:18] a fake report now, meanwhile we simply see that again and again and again
[00:41:22] this thing causes chaos in the skies and a lot
[00:41:25] of headaches for passengers who find themselves. Flying from one place
[00:41:28] to another in a third destination that is not
[00:41:37] was driving with Aviv in a car on Highway 6, a huge
[00:41:41] hit their car, by a miracle they were not
[00:41:52] God, my father and I were driving in the morning
[00:41:56] on Highway 6 north towards the factory, we work
[00:41:59] there. It was at 10
[00:42:02] to 7 exactly we passed the gas station where
[00:42:06] we change a flat tire, and suddenly.
[00:42:19] It hit our hood and from there flew into the car
[00:42:23] through the windshield, broke the windshield, our windshield shattered,
[00:42:26] it hit my father, he was driving at the time, it hit his left
[00:42:30] side, really a centimeter from him, hit the pillar, crushed
[00:42:33] the pillar and came back
[00:42:40] He now, now, thank God.
[00:42:43] At that time he told me, Paz, the stone
[00:42:46] hit me. I looked at him, I saw that he was all dripping
[00:42:50] blood. We stopped at the side
[00:42:53] of the road, and while I was talking to the ambulance, the ambulance told
[00:42:57] me, take off your shirt, give him something clean to put on his head,
[00:43:00] so I took off my jacket, put it on his head, pressed it on his head,
[00:43:04] and until the ambulance arrived, and we did tests and everything
[00:43:08] at the hospital, and thank God.
[00:43:13] You manage to understand where such a rock
[00:43:16] fell from? Yes,
[00:43:20] where from, yes, yes, we just passed
[00:43:23] a bridge, a bridge with
[00:43:27] a fence, and now in hindsight, after the incident happened and it
[00:43:30] was published, people talk to me, people contact me and say, a stone was thrown
[00:43:33] at me from there too, it hit the windshield, it hit the hood, it's not
[00:43:37] one incident and not
[00:43:45] I spoke exactly when I called the ambulance, I also called
[00:43:49] the mobile police unit to arrive, the mobile police unit while we were lifting my father
[00:43:53] into the ambulance, I waited there and the mobile police unit asked me questions,
[00:43:56] so I told her, what is this, another complaint that's going to waste here, and then she
[00:44:00] tells me, we'll check if there are cameras, but if not, she does this with her
[00:44:04] hands, like she has nothing to do. Yes, you
[00:44:07] still have to keep driving on the road to get
[00:44:10] to work, do you see yourself going back to driving on this
[00:44:14] road?
[00:44:17] Hard, hard, but every morning we drive there,
[00:44:20] and that's the problem, it's not one bridge, there are several bridges there,
[00:44:24] around all the villages, it's actually attempted
[00:44:27] murder, it's not, if you see the stone, I believe
[00:44:31] it was also in the pictures, you see in the pictures, yes, it's not a stone, it's really
[00:45:13] considered the great political promise in Israel, everyone admired him,
[00:45:17] he was a genius, he was something so different, a Haredi of a different kind, he
[00:45:21] rocked, we saw hope in him, a bridge between secular
[00:45:24] and Haredi.
[00:45:31] He came hungry for power, he controls all the local authorities
[00:45:34] in the State of Israel, he went from minister to minister and he convinced them to overthrow
[00:45:38] the government, he is the father and mother of government corruption
[00:45:41] in Israel. Dear, premiere episode,
[00:45:45] soon, on KAN 11 and on KAN
[00:45:48] Box. Tomorrow on the show, Ona Bana, Yona Kafachuri
[00:45:51] Gudli, Moshi Galmin, Muni
[00:48:19] We're back with this story coming to us from Morocco. Is
[00:48:22] the Likud movement
[00:48:33] it Hizb al-Wahda, which is the Unity Party in a loose translation, which is
[00:48:37] the Likud. That's at least how it appeared on social media in recent days.
[00:48:40] And it all came out on an Algerian TV channel, which if you remember Karen,
[00:48:44] Algerians and Moroccans are not really friends, hostile countries with no
[00:48:47] relations due to the Western Sahara issue, and therefore the Algerians are trying to embarrass
[00:48:51] the Moroccans in every way.
[00:48:58] a new Jewish one that will represent the Jews in Morocco and will be called Likud,
[00:49:02] which is also something very annoying because it's obvious that although there is a Jewish community in Morocco,
[00:49:05] they really don't like the Likud in Morocco, and certainly not the one who leads it in general.
[00:49:09] Not popular in the Arab world. So let's see the report that brought
[00:49:13] it all out. Here it is.
[00:49:16] A Jewish party in Morocco causes widespread controversy.
[00:49:20] The story began with the announcement of the establishment of a Jewish party
[00:49:23] to be adopted by the Ministry of Interior of the Makhzen regime.
[00:49:26] It adopts the Jewish religion as its reference, with special
[00:49:30] attention to Jews of Moroccan origin, in a dangerous
[00:49:33] and unprecedented political step. The party
[00:49:37] carries the name "Al-Wahda Party" (Unity Party), while its Hebrew name
[00:49:40] means "Likud Party," and it is an extension of the well-known
[00:49:44] Israeli political party which
[00:49:53] You are absolutely right, and look, let's say that all of this is of course not
[00:49:56] true, in fact there was an anonymous person who sent
[00:50:00] this letter with the new party he wants to establish to the Moroccan Ministry of Interior, except
[00:50:03] that the Moroccan Ministry of Interior published a notice that no party was established, they received his letter,
[00:50:07] but from their point of view it does not meet the criteria for establishing a party in Morocco,
[00:50:11] in fact he says the document in question is not a notice of the establishment of a party, but
[00:50:14] a letter sent to the Ministry of Interior, in Morocco the law
[00:50:17] prohibits the establishment of parties based on religion, language or ethnic identity, and this
[00:50:21] is indeed interesting, because in the end you have. A relatively large Jewish community compared
[00:50:24] to other Arab countries, something like 2000 people, and in the end you know
[00:50:28] the question of their participation in politics, of course they are allowed to participate, but establishing a Jewish
[00:50:32] party is probably something that won't happen soon, mainly due to the fact
[00:50:35] that the American street is very unfriendly to Israel, especially in recent
[00:50:39] years, very much with a pro- Palestinian sentiment, and this thing is really a fake
[00:50:43] that Algerians used to make fun of Morocco,
[00:50:46] but I want to tell you that the reactions Karen, some of them are not that negative, there
[00:50:50] are some who say maybe it's not such a bad idea.
[00:51:14] This will be
[00:51:18] history, political.
[00:51:21] Who will represent?