METROTV — Metro TV
20260806 010500 UTC
392 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] later if there is an official report regarding the victims who
[00:00:05] it cannot be said that 100% of what have not been found from KSOP or Porres Tanyu Perak,
[00:00:07] they will not rule out
[00:00:10] conducting a search again. For now, that's the
[00:00:14] report from Surabaya, East Java.
[00:00:18] Okay, thank you, Metro TV journalist Mahmud Fauzi reporting live and good
[00:00:22] luck with your work. That's the information in this
[00:00:26] headline news and good morning Indonesia will continue shortly.
[00:00:48] Being active from the morning usually makes you tired in the afternoon, therefore
[00:00:51] we need to recharge and it's not just energy that needs to be recharged, but
[00:00:55] we also need to recharge information. The more
[00:00:58] information we have, the less uncertainty there will be in our
[00:01:02] lives, so we can make more on-point decisions, that's
[00:01:06] why it's very important for us to be smart about choosing reliable
[00:01:09] and credible sources of information. Recharge your day, recharge
[00:01:13] your knowledge, Metro siang every day at
[00:01:16] 11 AM, explore a new way of getting
[00:01:20] information, with a single touch of a finger,
[00:01:24] enter the most up-to- date world, only in one news
[00:01:27] app, get comprehensive Metro
[00:01:30] TV news as well as clear reviews and
[00:01:34] fresh perspectives typical of Indonesian media and metcom.id,
[00:01:38] more complete with audio features to accompany your
[00:01:41] productive day. So you know the fastest, download
[00:01:45] Metro TV X10
[00:01:46] now.
[00:01:52] Supported by Nufo Family to step ahead with triple
[00:01:55] antibacterial formula.
[00:02:00] Thank you for still being with us in Good Morning Indonesia this morning, viewers, we
[00:02:03] will present to you a review and explanation of the investigation into the
[00:02:07] alleged money laundering case involving
[00:02:11] former Jampidsus Febri Adriansyah continues to
[00:02:13] develop. So the Attorney General's Office revealed new facts, four
[00:02:17] companies owned by suspect Don Rito were allegedly used as a means
[00:02:20] of money laundering. Investigators also continue to develop asset tracing and
[00:02:24] collect evidence in this case. So, viewers, we will
[00:02:28] see this in the development of the case, the
[00:02:31] Attorney General's Office's Team 9
[00:02:34] raided six locations on August 3rd
[00:02:37] then. It turns out that four of them are companies
[00:02:41] owned by suspect Don Rito in the South Jakarta
[00:02:43] area, then one of them was also a
[00:02:47] raid at Don Rito's office and also at the house of
[00:02:51] suspect Nurman Herin in Depok, West Java. Then, viewers, let's look at the
[00:02:55] Well, Mr. Yunus, what was next slide, it turns out that the four companies that were raided
[00:02:58] are these, PT H. I PTPIS, PT
[00:03:02] KPE and also PTSME, and
[00:03:05] these four companies are suspected of being used
[00:03:09] first, even though there are already allegations of money laundering as a means to commit money laundering, criminal acts
[00:03:12] of money laundering in the case involving Febri Adriansyah.
[00:03:16] Now, investigators, in the next slide, we see
[00:03:19] continue to develop into a number of other
[00:03:22] locations. Viewers, the Attorney General's Office also
[00:03:26] has examined four witnesses from the private sector, then.
[00:03:30] There are names T, R, DH and also
[00:03:34] HH. Now this raid continues and
[00:03:37] asset tracing and also collection of evidence are still
[00:03:40] being done at this time. Furthermore, viewers, in the midst
[00:03:44] of the ongoing investigation, the Attorney General's Office also
[00:03:47] temporarily suspended Febri Adriansyah. We see,
[00:03:51] so he has been temporarily suspended from his status as
[00:03:55] a prosecutor as of July 31,
[00:03:57] 2026 and...
[00:04:00] This alleged money laundering case eventually ensnared Febri Adriansyah
[00:04:03] with evidence of gold weighing
[00:04:06] 474 kg and also cash of
[00:04:10] 543 billion, and these
[00:04:14] are the facts that we have seen
[00:04:17] from the results of the investigation in Febri Adriansyah's case which have been conducted
[00:04:21] by Team 9, and viewers, Febri Adriansyah's legal team
[00:04:25] filed a pre-trial lawsuit to test the legality
[00:04:28] of the suspect determination process, detention and
[00:04:32] forced efforts carried out by investigators in the investigation of
[00:04:35] this case. So Febri's legal team
[00:04:37] 50% have been followed up believes that the seizure of several assets must
[00:04:41] be legally accountable because it was carried out in a case
[00:04:45] that entangled his colleague,
[00:04:49] 50%, because not even 50% are but there must still be an originating criminal act, there must be initial evidence
[00:04:55] are proceeds of crime? Evidence is first.
[00:04:59] Former Jampidsus Febri Adriansyah officially filed a pre-trial lawsuit
[00:05:02] with the South Jakarta District Court on Wednesday,
[00:05:05] August 5, 2026.
[00:05:08] The first lawsuit was aimed at the Attorney General's Office over the designation
[00:05:12] of the suspect. The criminal act of money laundering or TPPU and
[00:05:15] detention efforts. The legal team assessed that there were procedural legal
[00:05:19] irregularities and violations of principles in handling
[00:05:21] the case.
[00:05:24] Meanwhile, the second lawsuit was aimed at the actions of investigators from the Metro Jaya Police and the Corruption Eradication Task Force or
[00:05:28] Kortas Tipi Korpori regarding the determination of suspects in alleged
[00:05:32] corruption and money laundering, including
[00:05:35] searches and seizures carried out in
[00:05:38] the said case.
[00:06:12] needs to wait for the proof of the originating crime
[00:06:15] to reach the court, a court decision or
[00:06:19] legally binding, but
[00:06:21] there must still be an originating criminal act, there must be initial
[00:06:24] evidence first, only then
[00:06:26] can it be, well, we hope that later in
[00:06:30] the pre-trial process, these
[00:06:33] things can be clearly sorted out. We are not
[00:06:37] yet talking about the substance of the case, we are still talking
[00:06:40] about whether the investigative warrant
[00:06:44] is appropriate or not. If the investigative warrant violates
[00:06:48] the law, of course, all actions after
[00:06:51] that investigative warrant become legally invalid.
[00:06:55] This is what we want to test.
[00:06:58] However, the Attorney General's Office promises to reveal the owner of 74 kg of
[00:07:02] gold in the money laundering case
[00:07:05] involving Febri Adriansyah at the trial of
[00:07:08] the said case. The Head of the Legal Information Center of the AGO.
[00:07:12] Supriatna affirmed that some details of the case, including asset
[00:07:16] ownership, could not be disclosed to the public for the sake of
[00:07:19] the investigation. The pre-trial hearing will not
[00:07:23] determine who owns the seized money and gold. The judge
[00:07:26] will only examine the legality of the investigator's actions in
[00:07:30] conducting the seizure. If the lawsuit is granted,
[00:07:34] the legality of the evidence may become an issue in the subsequent
[00:07:37] legal process. However, proof of asset ownership
[00:07:41] and alleged criminal acts will still be examined in the main
[00:07:44] case. Metro TV
[00:07:46] Reporting Team.
[00:07:49] So, viewers, how to read and analyze the development of the investigation
[00:07:53] into the alleged money laundering in Febri Adriansyah's case, we will
[00:07:57] discuss it this morning with former head of PPATK Yunus Husein who has
[00:08:00] connected with us via zoom call. Mr. Yunus, good
[00:08:08] brought up by Febri Adriansyah's
[00:08:11] lawyer was about the originating criminal
[00:08:14] act in proving money laundering. Is it necessary
[00:08:17] for the originating criminal act to be proven
[00:08:21] committed?
[00:08:24] Uh, the answer is definitely no. Mr. Febri
[00:08:27] already mentioned that it is not necessary.
[00:08:31] Normatively, in Law 8 of 2010, there are three normative
[00:08:34] reasons, right? Article 69 says it is not mandatory to prove it
[00:08:37] first, as Mr. Febri mentioned earlier. Then Article 75,
[00:08:41] if a criminal investigator finds money laundering, they must combine it
[00:08:45] and report it to PPATK. The third, Article 77
[00:08:48] states that the defendant is obliged to prove that their assets are not
[00:08:52] from criminal acts. Now, there are hundreds
[00:08:55] of jurisprudence in general courts up to the Supreme
[00:08:58] Court that show it does not need to be proven
[00:09:02] first. Even the Constitutional Court in its decisions in 2014,
[00:09:06] 2015-2017 rejected lawsuits against Article
[00:09:09] 69 this.
[00:09:12] Rejected the lawsuit against Article
[00:09:14] 69
[00:09:16] because it is indeed not mandatory first. Then, in the practice of countries abroad
[00:09:20] or international standards, I have asked judges
[00:09:24] from the Netherlands, America, Australia, then standards from UNODC,
[00:09:28] United Nations Office on Drug and Crime, IMF, all
[00:09:32] say it is not mandatory to prove it first. Now,
[00:09:35] in money laundering, what is important is assets originating
[00:09:38] from criminal acts, proceeds of crime. If you look at articles
[00:09:42] 2, 3 and 4, 5, right, it mentions
[00:09:46] assets originating from various criminal acts,
[00:09:49] right? Now, how to prove these assets, if
[00:09:53] according to the Criminal Procedure Code, Article
[00:09:57] 123, it can indeed be seized if the assets are not clearly owned but
[00:10:00] are strongly suspected of originating from criminal acts. Now, how to
[00:10:04] prove these assets
[00:10:08] regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, there are eight types, right? Then,
[00:10:11] a kind of financial
[00:10:14] investigation like network analysis, right?
[00:10:18] For example, one example that is widely used by educators in
[00:10:21] internal services in America, they
[00:10:25] analyze how source and application, how
[00:10:28] the source of funds and the use of funds by
[00:10:31] the person concerned. If it is unbalanced, disparate, cannot be
[00:10:35] explained, it means there is a strong suspicion of an illegal source. Now that
[00:10:39] indicates the existence of proceeds of crime, only then
[00:10:43] will the investigator enter money laundering, regarding
[00:10:45] assets suspected of being proceeds of crime earlier, let's say what has already
[00:10:49] the defendant is obliged to prove it according to
[00:10:53] Article 77 which adopts reverse burden of proof. This
[00:10:57] reverse burden of proof is not to punish the perpetrator, not to seize the
[00:11:00] asset because it originated from a criminal act. So
[00:11:04] if it doesn't need to be proven, I think the legal advisors also
[00:11:07] agree, but the difference is that
[00:11:11] I prioritize the assets first, the proceeds of crime. If he
[00:11:14] asks for the originating criminal act to be there first, the proceeds of crime must
[00:11:18] be there, that is absolute and non-negotiable because follow the money, follow the money,
[00:11:21] the money, the assets must be there. Well, so
[00:11:25] follow the money. Now, if there are currently four companies
[00:11:28] allegedly related to the money laundering case involving Febri Adriansyah,
[00:11:32] what needs to be proven from these four companies, Mr. Yunus?
[00:11:34] Uh,
[00:11:37] these four companies indicate that the
[00:11:41] perpetrator used a mode, the main one in money
[00:11:45] laundering in this world, which is called "concealment within
[00:11:48] business structures," hiding behind
[00:11:52] corporations that he controls. So,
[00:12:25] a strong agreement, a valid agreement, and this is very
[00:12:28] unusual, the amount is very large and this fulfills
[00:12:32] the modus operandi of money laundering in addition to using corporations
[00:12:36] with cash and gold in such large quantities, this is what is called
[00:12:39] in money laundering terms "anonymous assets",
[00:12:43] assets without a name, right? If you use money and gold,
[00:12:46] even the gold has no documents and it's not from
[00:12:49] Antam. This is called anonymous assets, assets
[00:12:53] without a paper trail, no records, so it hinders
[00:12:56] intelligence, it hinders information that complicates
[00:13:00] the tracing of the origin of assets from criminal acts.
[00:13:03] Indeed, this is one of the modus operandi like that, using
[00:13:06] companies, this is only four, there might be more than four
[00:13:10] companies belonging to the person concerned, there might be dozens, hmm.
[00:13:13] Mr. Yunus, can those anonymous assets be confiscated by the state again when
[00:13:17] the defendant later proves in the process
[00:13:21] that the ownership of these anonymous assets belongs to him, perhaps? Right,
[00:13:25] no. It can be.
[00:13:28] Article 123 of the Criminal Procedure Code states that
[00:13:31] what can be seized is point 8, letter h,
[00:13:35] namely assets that are suspected of originating
[00:13:39] from criminal acts that are not clearly owned. Now, if it's not
[00:13:42] clear, then he will prove in court who
[00:13:46] owns it. If he points to A, please
[00:13:48] call him and ask him to explain. And it's a bit strange
[00:13:52] if it's not his asset, why would he
[00:13:55] appeal for the search or seizure? If
[00:13:59] someone else's asset is seized, just leave it. If it's his asset,
[00:14:02] then he can file an appeal because his asset was
[00:14:05] seized during the search. But if
[00:14:09] it's not his asset, he shouldn't bother with it, right? That's someone
[00:14:13] else's asset. There's something unique
[00:14:16] there. Okay, Mr. Yunus,
[00:14:19] from this case, it is now more progressive,
[00:14:23] more reaching a point. But if we look back in
[00:14:27] Indonesia, from several cases of alleged money laundering
[00:14:30] or money laundering that have occurred, how many then
[00:14:33] escaped the snare of asset confiscation to return to
[00:14:37] the state? So I'll start from
[00:14:41] PPATK's reports only. PPATK has two
[00:14:44] products, analysis results and examination
[00:14:47] results. If analysis results are only from the desktop, it does not
[00:14:51] involve going to the field. If examination results involve going to the field, it can examine
[00:14:55] without coercion. Now, from the analysis and examination
[00:14:59] results, indeed not yet
[00:15:02] by investigators, not yet 50%.
[00:15:05] From that basic assumption alone, we can
[00:15:09] say that the recovery is also not more than
[00:15:14] processed, right? Now, it is possible that even those processed
[00:15:18] do not return. It could be because the documents are incomplete, it could be
[00:15:21] in another country so it requires
[00:15:25] mutual legal assistance which often takes time
[00:15:28] and is rather difficult, especially if it is
[00:15:32] in countries that do not have cooperation with Indonesia, right? But if there is
[00:15:35] cooperation, it can, but it still takes time and there are still
[00:15:39] difficulties. So
[00:15:42] was reported returned, no,
[00:15:45] mostly it does not 100%
[00:15:48] return. Well, that's how it is,
[00:15:51] viewers, the reality right now, and thank you, Mr. Yunus Husein, for
[00:15:55] joining us this morning on Good Morning
[00:15:57] Indonesia.
[00:16:00] Later, I'll take a break for you. There's another review about the complaint
[00:16:04] of a BPJS Health participant who claimed to have to wait
[00:16:08] up to 8 hours to get an inpatient room, which went viral on social
[00:16:12] media. See you soon.
[00:16:27] Supported by Nufo Family to step ahead with triple
[00:16:30] antibacterial formula.
[00:16:35] I'm not worried about taking my child out to play. Nufo family provides protection, two
[00:16:39] steps to health.
[00:16:43] Oh, it's dirty, it's okay, Nufo is faster
[00:16:46] at fighting germs while bathing and always protects the skin after bathing,
[00:16:50] soft with triple antibacterial formula, comprehensive
[00:16:54] 24/7 protection. This is a home, it's outside.
[00:16:57] Trust Nufo family to step ahead, 24/7
[00:17:01] protection. Wings care.
[00:17:04] Perfect your interior design with
[00:17:08] Sunda. Wow, realize your imagination with
[00:17:11] the best design to decorate and protect your
[00:17:14] home. With Sunda.
[00:17:17] My eyes are tired from rubbing them every day.
[00:17:21] That's why I drink Eye Fit, eye
[00:17:24] vitamins with eight active ingredients. Eye Fit with
[00:17:28] a new look. Love your eyes. Drink Eye Fit from
[00:17:32] Lapi.
[00:18:07] forever, oh what does it mean? I had a stroke, my blood pressure
[00:18:11] was 160. I had
[00:18:15] a blocked blood vessel. The changes I felt
[00:18:18] in my blood pressure, cholesterol, my
[00:18:22] sugar levels are more stable, below normal. Watch the full
[00:18:25] discussion only on Go Healthy, the right way to live
[00:18:28] healthy, Thursday, August 6th at 1:30
[00:18:32] PM.
[00:18:35] The legal case involving former Junior Attorney General for Special Crimes Febri Adriansyah
[00:18:39] is expected to enter a new chapter. After the suspect status
[00:18:43] was determined, Febri's legal team stated that they would pursue legal
[00:18:46] action through a pre-trial. Now the public awaits how
[00:18:50] the entire legal process will unfold.
[00:18:53] Guided by. Unaccepting of being named a suspect,
[00:18:57] Febri fights back in Cover Both Side today at 1
[00:19:01] PM.
[00:19:03] Controversy of evidence in Febri's case, Thursday, August
[00:19:06] 6th.
[00:19:12] Supported by Nufo Family to step ahead with triple
[00:19:15] antibacterial formula.
[00:19:19] As usual, viewers, there are a number of agendas that we will inform
[00:20:10] What will happen today, viewers, is related to the pre-trial hearing filed
[00:20:14] by Roy Suryo, suspect in the alleged fake diploma case of the 7th President
[00:20:17] of the Republic of Indonesia which enters its final stage
[00:20:19] at the South Jakarta
[00:20:22] District Court.
[00:20:25] Waalaikumussalam warahmatullahi wabarakatuh. Single Judge I Ketut
[00:20:28] Darpawan scheduled the reading of the verdict for today, Thursday,
[00:20:32] August 6, 2026. The trial agenda will focus on
[00:20:35] the submission of conclusions from both parties.
[00:20:53] The next agenda, viewers, the public prosecutor
[00:20:56] will resubmit the case file of Tifa Uzia Suma or Dr.
[00:21:00] Tifa to the East Jakarta District
[00:21:02] Court.
[00:21:08] The submission of the file was done after previously the Panel of Judges decided
[00:21:12] the prosecutor's indictment to be legally null and void in an interlocutory
[00:21:15] judgment. The trial of this case will be held today and the trial will begin with
[00:21:18] the reading of the indictment by the Public
[00:21:20] Prosecutor.
[00:21:23] indictment
[00:21:24] will be
[00:21:28] read to the South Jakarta
[00:21:32] District Attorney's
[00:21:33] Office.
[00:21:37] Case register number
[00:21:38] and
[00:21:42] viewers, that's some information about the agenda that will take place throughout
[00:21:46] today, and now I will rejoin my colleague Valen who will update
[00:21:50] on the information that is currently trending on social media. Yes, Jason, viewers,
[00:21:54] if this one is trending and making
[00:21:57] many people angry, so there is a complaint from a BPJS
[00:22:00] Health participant who claimed to have to wait up to 8 hours
[00:22:04] to get an inpatient room went viral on social media, and this complaint
[00:22:07] drew cynical comments from a number
[00:22:11] of accounts that were allegedly owned by healthcare
[00:22:14] professionals, including a doctor who referred
[00:22:17] to the morgue as a place that is always available.
[00:22:20] He
[00:22:25] This event, viewers, triggered public criticism, especially after
[00:22:28] the patient named Yurizal Tri
[00:22:31] Chairawan was known to have passed away 3 days
[00:22:34] later. The doctor who became the spotlight has publicly
[00:22:37] apologized and admitted to regretting
[00:22:39] his comments.
[00:22:56] Good evening everyone, my name is Beni Christian Sihombing. I want
[00:23:00] to apologize for my comments
[00:23:03] on social media on Threads. I also want
[00:23:07] to express my deepest condolences to
[00:23:10] the thread owner, the late Yurizal.
[00:23:13] I pray that his entire family will be
[00:23:17] comforted. I take full responsibility
[00:23:21] for all the writings I made, and if there is
[00:23:23] a legal process later, I will follow it without
[00:23:27] defense or hiring a lawyer. I will also not do that.
[00:23:31] I accept all consequences from the hospital, from IDI,
[00:23:35] or MKMK, or the court, or other
[00:23:38] institutions. I only have and I only
[00:23:41] have one Threads account and also one Instagram account.
[00:23:45] I don't have a second account, and I will also not
[00:23:48] make my Instagram private. I have not deleted
[00:23:52] any comments, and I will also read all of those
[00:23:55] comments because indeed I made a mistake, and I
[00:23:59] deserve it. There is
[00:24:03] no clarification. I apologize for causing
[00:24:06] this commotion, and I also apologize profusely to my fellow
[00:24:10] doctors who provide education on social media
[00:24:13] for ruining those efforts. I
[00:24:16] hope that in the future, I will be wiser
[00:24:20] in using social media.
[00:24:24] Until now, viewers, there has been no official statement regarding what caused
[00:24:28] the patient's death in relation to the delay
[00:24:30] in getting a treatment room.
[00:24:42] The mystery of the cause of death of a doctor in Siak
[00:24:46] Regency, Riau, has finally been revealed. Siak Police revealed that Dr. Alex
[00:24:50] Christotoris committed suicide due to psychological
[00:24:52] factors.
[00:24:55] In his press conference, the Siak Police Chief
[00:24:58] AKBP Sepuh AD Irsyam Siragar presented
[00:25:01] a forensic doctor from Riau Police, a psychologist from the Islamic University
[00:25:05] of Riau, and the Siak Police Narcotics Unit.
[00:25:08] The Police Chief explained that there were no signs of violence on Dr.
[00:25:11] Alex's body when he was found next to RSUD Tengku
[00:25:15] Ravian. Near the victim, a bag containing various
[00:25:19] medical equipment was found, including a stethoscope, a number of
[00:25:22] anesthesia drugs, and syringes. Meanwhile, based
[00:25:25] on all evidence, witness statements, expert results,
[00:25:29] autopsy, and forensic psychology examination,
[00:25:32] it was concluded that the victim died due to mental pressure that caused him
[00:25:36] to end his life. Siak Police also revealed allegations
[00:25:40] that the victim was entangled in online loans. Previously, on
[00:25:43] July 4, 2026, RSUD security officers found
[00:25:47] the victim's body in the Blukar bush. It was known that
[00:25:51] Alex at that time was participating in an anesthesia
[00:25:54] specialist residency
[00:25:56] program.
[00:26:02] All of these examination results can