N1BOS — broadcast
20260911 070000 UTC
479 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] of that, therefore, blocking questions through the violation of the constitution, which is the highest
[00:00:03] act of the federation, so this disgrace from the House of Peoples happens,
[00:00:07] then we have these excuses that don't hold water, which, it seems to me,
[00:00:10] only serve to mislead the public with some story, some
[00:00:13] procedures, and how the proposer says it won't
[00:00:16] pass, let's not talk about what kind of feeling that is, where it says that, so the constitution
[00:00:20] clearly said no, not based on a feeling that something won't pass, not by voting,
[00:00:23] not by some kind of opinion or interpretation, but
[00:00:27] it will be clearly included on the agenda. So the April
[00:00:30] session was the last instance, we are now in
[00:00:33] September, and there were a few more extraordinary sessions, and another regular
[00:00:37] session, this issue was never allowed to be discussed, and I just want to know
[00:00:41] why, what is the problem with all of this, why are they so afraid of this
[00:00:44] discussion, is it non-transparency and
[00:00:48] the practice in which patients have been for decades without
[00:00:51] witness protection during childbirth
[00:00:54] the main reason? Well, we cannot claim
[00:00:57] who is responsible, who is behind this resistance, but what... It is certainly clear and visible
[00:01:01] to all of us that after a year of trying for something so simple, where everyone
[00:01:05] says they support this issue, it is obvious that there is resistance, and
[00:01:09] I think the answer to the question of what the resistance is precisely these questions about
[00:01:12] who is bothered by companionship, who can be bothered, who is bothered that
[00:01:16] a woman in labor has someone next to her, who is bothered that we have a witness in the
[00:01:19] delivery room, who is creating this resistance that we can now call systemic
[00:01:23] resistance, because this really goes beyond all measure, we are now talking about a draft
[00:01:27] law that implies public discussion and we have so much
[00:01:30] resistance to public discussion on this topic, which is already standard in the world, and believe me, I'm
[00:01:34] tired of hearing from our doctors, and rarely does anyone
[00:01:37] express themselves on this issue, only when they are forced to,
[00:01:40] "I support companionship, but what if
[00:01:44] you support companionship, do something about it," so there's no "I support,
[00:01:47] but," we're just talking about excuses all the time, then the politicians took all that talk,
[00:01:51] everyone has some kind of support that is verbal, on the other hand, they are
[00:01:55] practically fighting against
[00:01:58] that, uh, you want your ultimate goal
[00:02:02] is, uh, the complete abolition of
[00:02:04] obstetric violence, corruption, which we all hear about,
[00:02:08] everyone has at least one case in the family where this happened,
[00:02:12] true, so demands are not sent to we can't lie that it has been eradicated
[00:02:15] in our health institutions. What does
[00:02:18] practice from the region and Europe show?
[00:02:22] How much does presence change
[00:02:24] precisely those bad aspects of childbirth for
[00:02:28] women? Absolutely drastically changes, so the change is...
[00:02:31] the most visible, the most obvious and the biggest when we talk about companionship during childbirth.
[00:02:35] For this reason, we focused on this topic precisely because we have a
[00:02:39] great aspect of prevention of obstetric violence and corruption in
[00:02:42] maternity wards. When you have a person next to the woman in labor, she is not alone, and she cannot be,
[00:02:46] even someone who openly and clearly commits obstetric violence, verbal violence
[00:02:49] against a woman in labor, cannot behave in the same way, must be much
[00:02:53] more considerate, because the woman in labor is no longer in a position, you know how a woman in labor thinks about
[00:02:56] her child then, she doesn't think about herself, you simply don't have an automatic defense mechanism
[00:03:00] from in... in that context of some attack, whether verbal or emotional conditioning, but the person
[00:03:04] who is with her protects the woman in labor, so she also supports
[00:03:07] the woman in labor. You have recorded very moving testimonies
[00:03:10] throughout all these years of your fight for presence during childbirth,
[00:03:14] yes, there is a lot of trauma, there are many things that are not adequate at all,
[00:03:18] and you know what else, not all traumas, but even those experiences that someone
[00:03:21] evaluates as positive have a very large number of omissions in the context of patients' rights.
[00:03:25] Every woman in labor will find at least one sentence that was not
[00:03:29] right. That is verbal violence, so we absolutely have a
[00:03:33] situation where our system is so bad that we are surprised by a pleasant
[00:03:36] situation, that we are trying to present what was not ideal
[00:03:40] as ideal because it was not as traumatic as the stories we hear. So we must not
[00:03:43] wait for traumas, we must not wait for consequences, we must do something,
[00:03:47] prevent. I am aware that there are many doctors who support this issue,
[00:03:51] but they do not support it publicly, so they do not dare to speak, because we also have
[00:03:54] many who do not want this to be implemented so easily,
[00:03:58] they talk about excuses, rooms, about protecting the profession, we heard in parliament,
[00:04:02] in parliamentary benches, doctors talking about protecting the profession when
[00:04:06] talking about patients' rights, so we heard how the right cannot be
[00:04:10] defined until the conditions are met, what are we talking about, we are twisting things, so the right is
[00:04:13] the basis, first the right is defined legally, then we talk about the conditions, we
[00:04:17] absolutely have so many problematic ways of talking about
[00:04:21] this topic that it is unbelievable, and it is so simple, so trivially
[00:04:24] recommended by the profession, all professions, there is absolutely
[00:04:28] not a single argument against it.
[00:04:30] "But we have so much resistance, which is really ironic and alarming
[00:04:34] and terrifying for us as citizens, what will we do when we start talking about
[00:04:37] obstetric violence, when we start talking about some serious situations
[00:04:41] and serious changes in the health system, when we can't solve
[00:04:44] something so simple and trivial, and that talk about privacy
[00:04:48] that they talk about, we can't do it because of the privacy of women in labor, privacy is guaranteed
[00:04:52] by law, how does a woman in labor not have privacy now, why are three women in labor delivering in
[00:04:56] the same room, they use their violation of the law as an excuse for
[00:04:59] not respecting further recommendations, it is absolutely
[00:05:02] unbelievable to what extent we are reaching, and this kind, this criminal
[00:05:06] complaint is practically a last attempt by the NGO sector to do something,
[00:05:10] because you have a situation where the top of the House of People openly violates
[00:05:13] the constitution, and it gets away with it, it's an election
[00:05:17] year, we're in a pre-election campaign, no one cares,
[00:05:20] it's tireless, it says that we as a nation are disappearing from these
[00:05:23] areas, pro-natalist policy is
[00:05:26] something that parties promote before every
[00:05:29] election, unfortunately we have them every two years and
[00:05:33] we hear a lot about it, even if it's not in their
[00:05:36] jurisdiction, what does politics say,
[00:05:40] here, government, opposition, you
[00:05:44] have been in the House of Peoples many times, in the House of Representatives of the Federation Parliament, I met you at
[00:05:46] recordings, talked to those
[00:05:50] delegates, those representatives, what do they tell you?
[00:05:54] You see, most of them will not openly say anything negative, they are all for it, but
[00:05:58] somehow, everyone is generally now I will
[00:06:01] ask you about many women in labor and talk about family allowances and so on, we are
[00:06:04] really for natality, of course, which is inevitable and that is one aspect
[00:06:08] of this story, our research shows that women in labor give birth to
[00:06:12] more children because they are afraid to return to the maternity ward, as they say, that slaughterhouse,
[00:06:16] and so on, so we have that consequence of natality directly, how much
[00:06:19] companionship during childbirth affects natalist policy, and we drew attention to that because it is something
[00:06:23] that politicians talk about, however, is there a real
[00:06:27] political will besides that talk that means nothing to us?
[00:06:31] Well, last year, when we were discussing this, it seemed to us that we had it because they were saying
[00:06:35] and talking about how it would be very easily and clearly resolved within two or three
[00:06:38] months, the law would be completed under an accelerated procedure, but
[00:06:42] when the law was submitted as such, resistance began. First, the ministry never
[00:06:46] submitted an opinion on that law, so absolutely, you directly
[00:06:49] accused some parties from the ruling coalition of
[00:06:53] obstructing the adoption? Well, you see, we always followed what was happening
[00:06:57] in parliament, our votes were the basis of all that, what happened in the House of Peoples was precisely
[00:07:00] the avoidance of those votes, because when we published who voted how, some
[00:07:04] parties stood out in that context because they were the ones who obstructed it, but
[00:07:08] essentially, the accusations came directly from citizens, and then some
[00:07:12] party representatives were even angry in the context of how we
[00:07:15] organized resistance and similar things, no, that is democracy, so it is the right of citizens to
[00:07:19] ask why you, for whom I voted, voted against
[00:07:23] this issue, why are you obstructing what women need, what women demand, what is a necessity
[00:07:27] for citizens, what are those parties? Well, HDZ and SDA are the two parties that most
[00:07:30] obstructed this issue in the context of that aspect in
[00:07:33] the House of Representatives while we had, well, now regarding the House of Peoples, we cannot even get
[00:07:37] a vote in some aspect, because believe me, when there was a proposal for a vote and when
[00:07:41] individual declarations were requested, practically the entire House of Peoples
[00:07:44] turned around and said no, no, that kind of public
[00:07:48] calling out cannot be prevented, because the reason why we have such a blockage, I am sure, is because
[00:07:52] no one dares to stand by their beliefs against companionship during childbirth, so no one dares to
[00:07:56] vote against, especially not in an election year, so that women will not call them out tomorrow,
[00:08:00] because it is not about calling out women from Sarajevo, it is not about
[00:08:02] calling out, meaning that someone is focused, no, the entire
[00:08:06] Federation and even Republika Srpska are involved in this issue, women are asking why,
[00:08:10] how, so this is also calling out and demanding accountability
[00:08:13] from those who are elected there, that is what I think is the most important thing in this whole difficult
[00:08:17] story that came out that people need to understand that those who
[00:08:21] sit in parliament are not divinely appointed, that they are there because someone elected them and that
[00:08:25] they have a responsibility towards citizens, that is what they forget
[00:08:29] first, they simply do not feel that they should be held accountable, we submitted
[00:08:32] petitions with 5, 10,000 signatures, so there is no effect from that,
[00:08:36] so it means nothing to them what their citizens are telling them, they are only now talking to
[00:08:40] citizens, they are talking for this month and I... That's why I'm calling on citizens now, ask all
[00:08:44] your candidates, have you followed, will you support them, but
[00:08:47] not just verbally support, what will you do about it, if you are
[00:08:51] elected tomorrow and sit in the parliamentary benches, because this is the moment when
[00:08:55] you can ask, after October no one will ask you anything anymore, what
[00:08:58] after October, given that it is very
[00:09:01] likely there will be no more sessions,
[00:09:05] uh, after this criminal complaint, what are your next steps,
[00:09:09] are you perhaps considering protests or...
[00:09:12] some other form of pressure on the authorities? Well,
[00:09:16] the biggest problem is precisely the current situation, considering that the House of Peoples will not be formed
[00:09:19] so quickly, given the process and when the first session will be, realistically we cannot
[00:09:23] expect it before the end of the beginning of next year, we will continue to fight
[00:09:27] for this issue at all instances, so the criminal complaint is one aspect
[00:09:30] with which we will continue to seek and demand accountability, we will strive to work,
[00:09:34] we will not stop in the context of waiting for that session, so we
[00:09:38] are still working, we will still try, now I call on all candidates who
[00:09:42] are willing to support this issue, who are willing to be a full
[00:09:46] support tomorrow to work on this issue, to contact us, to express it publicly, we will organize
[00:09:50] some of our pre-election campaigns, as I like to call them, and street actions
[00:09:53] and similar things, to try to put this topic where it belongs,
[00:09:57] because this is such a simple, essential issue, an important
[00:10:00] issue, and so simple to solve, and I think it should be the focus while no one
[00:10:04] talks about it in some pre-election campaigns, because the focus is on some big
[00:10:08] state policy, and we are not solving the basic needs of citizens, which are so
[00:10:11] simple to fulfill. We will continue to work, we will work with hospitals and
[00:10:15] with ministries, we will try to solve this issue from multiple
[00:10:19] aspects, multiple ways, multiple sides, we don't have to wait for
[00:10:22] the law for this to be defined as companionship in
[00:10:26] hospitals. Every hospital can currently, so that there is companionship in the delivery room,
[00:10:30] if we are talking about current legal provisions, we have the right to privacy, the right to dignity,
[00:10:33] we have a legal obligation to work according to modern procedures, according to modern
[00:10:37] recommendations, so from the interpretation of the law, we already have obligations in
[00:10:40] hospitals, the idea of the law was to make it a
[00:10:44] direct, clear obligation, no one can say that it is not true, but we also have
[00:10:48] the ignoring of these obligations from the health system,
[00:10:50] absolutely, yes, absolutely, and generally we have a problem that the
[00:10:54] law is as it is, we would not have problems with companionship either, but
[00:10:57] unfortunately we are aware that even when the law is passed, we will probably have to continue fighting
[00:11:01] some who may not be so much in favor, but I hope it is clear to everyone that women in labor want
[00:11:04] this, they demand it, regardless of whether Baby Steps is there or not, that women in labor will not stop, and that
[00:11:08] is what I think is the key to change, that women are
[00:11:12] the key to new changes in our
[00:11:15] society. Thank you very much for your time and effort
[00:11:19] and work on this very important issue. Thank you for your support
[00:11:22] very much. Amila Tatarević, President of the Baby
[00:11:26] Steps association, was our guest.
[00:11:39] Aspirin Protect 100 mg. Recommended for people with
[00:11:43] high and very high risk of cardiovascular diseases. To
[00:11:47] reduce the risk of acute heart attack and stroke. Before
[00:11:51] use, carefully read the leaflet for information on indications and precautions, side effects of the medicine, consult
[00:11:54] your doctor or pharmacist. Bayer.
[00:11:58] The offer is here. Dog food friend. 1.40.
[00:12:01] Pedigree dog food 4.35. Cat litter
[00:12:05] Eurocat. 4.95. Pet pillow,
[00:12:08] 22.45. For the rest of the offer, visit
[00:12:11] bingobih.ba.
[00:12:39] music, users of musical copyrighted
[00:12:42] works, sign a contract with Amus, use music
[00:12:46] legally, Amus your
[00:12:48] partner,
[00:12:51] unlike you, we are just artificial intelligence.
[00:12:55] We have no heart, but you have someone counting on
[00:12:59] it. For those you love, take care of your heart,
[00:13:03] because your heart is not just yours. Aspirin protect (100
[00:13:06] mg) is recommended for people with high and very
[00:13:09] high risk of cardiovascular diseases, to
[00:13:12] reduce the risk of acute heart attack and stroke. Before
[00:13:16] use, carefully read the leaflet for information on indications and precautions, side effects of the medicine,
[00:13:19] consult your doctor or pharmacist. Bayer. Only at Fis,
[00:13:23] in the construction department, look for miter saw
[00:13:26] 249.90,
[00:13:29] canopy 77 marks 90, boiler
[00:13:32] Tessi 185 marks, bathroom cabinet
[00:13:36] 145, laminate 15 marks per
[00:13:39] square meter, shop with
[00:13:41] pleasure,
[00:13:43] every saving is a step towards a goal and turns dreams into reality, whoever
[00:13:47] saves, creates, term
[00:13:50] savings campaign in KM or EUR with a fixed
[00:13:53] rate, Sparkasse...
[00:13:56] According
[00:13:59] to the truth without censorship in times of social and moral
[00:14:03] crises, from the time that is missing, every day more and more
[00:14:06] in the fight for the top that never stops, without
[00:14:09] manipulation, journalism for social
[00:14:12] justice, independent and disciplined, not at all
[00:14:15] sensational. I am Amir Krigoši and you are watching
[00:14:19] N1.
[00:14:23] In the general elections of 200. 26, you will exercise your voting
[00:14:27] right using specific
[00:14:30] election technologies. Upon arrival at the polling station, you are required
[00:14:33] to identify yourself by presenting a valid identity card
[00:14:37] or driver's license or passport of Bosnia and
[00:14:39] Herzegovina. After electronic reading
[00:14:43] of data, place the index finger of your right hand flat on the device sensor
[00:14:47] for biometric authentication. Upon
[00:14:50] successful completion of identification and authentication, the device
[00:14:54] prints a confirmation which you sign, along with the ballot
[00:14:58] papers, you take the candidate list and the protective folder
[00:15:02] and go to the voting booth. The ballot
[00:15:05] papers have a new design and are marked exclusively
[00:15:08] with a special marker located in the voting booth.
[00:15:12] Be sure to read the instructions. On
[00:15:14] ballot papers where the names of individual
[00:15:18] candidates are listed, completely fill in the circle in front of the name of only
[00:15:22] one candidate. On the left side
[00:15:25] of the ballot paper are the names of political
[00:15:29] entities, on the right side of the ballot paper are columns with
[00:15:31] serial numbers of candidates.
[00:15:35] Be sure to completely fill in the circle in front of the name of only
[00:15:38] one political entity on the left side of the ballot paper,
[00:15:41] or be sure to completely fill in
[00:15:44] the circle in front of the name of only one political entity on the left
[00:15:48] side of the ballot paper and completely fill in the circle in front of
[00:15:52] one, two or a maximum of three serial numbers of candidates on
[00:15:54] the right side of the ballot paper. The corresponding
[00:15:58] serial numbers of candidates with their names and surnames are contained
[00:16:01] in the candidate list. After
[00:16:05] voting, place the ballot papers
[00:16:07] flat, unfolded, in the protective folder. You insert
[00:16:11] one ballot paper at a time into the scanner, face down.
[00:16:14] Be sure to return the protective folder and candidate list to
[00:16:18] the member of the polling committee.
[00:17:46] According to the truth without censorship in times of social and moral
[00:17:50] crises, from the time that is missing, every day more and more
[00:17:53] in the fight for the top that never stops, without
[00:17:56] manipulation, journalism for social
[00:17:59] justice, independent and disciplined, not at all
[00:18:02] sensational. I am Amed Krivoši and you are watching
[00:18:06] N1.
[00:19:27] It was awaited for more than 40 years, and it is being adopted by the caretaker
[00:19:30] government, which submitted a new urban plan to the parliamentary procedure
[00:19:34] for the next two decades. Instead of a vision
[00:19:37] of a green, modern city, the public is shaken by accusations of
[00:19:41] favoring the construction lobby, continued concretization, and
[00:19:44] permanent destruction of air corridors. Prime Minister
[00:19:48] Nihaduk, in resignation, claims that a historical
[00:19:51] document is being adopted, while the opposition, environmental activists,
[00:19:54] experts, and citizens warn of the systemic
[00:19:58] destruction of Sarajevo under the guise of development. Who is shaping
[00:20:02] the fate of Sarajevo for the next decades? We ask Nihad Vuk. Good
[00:20:05] morning and welcome. Good morning. Thank you for the invitation and good morning
[00:20:09] to the viewers. Before your guest appearance, I said it was a difficult
[00:20:12] topic, you said it was a nice topic.
[00:20:16] The urban plan was adopted by the government you
[00:20:18] lead, a document that directs hundreds
[00:20:22] of millions of marks and the fate
[00:20:25] of construction in Sarajevo for the next 20 years.
[00:20:29] With what legitimacy did you adopt that document, given that we know it
[00:20:33] is a caretaker government at this very
[00:20:37] moment, is that disputed? Absolutely not,
[00:20:41] so the government legally works regardless of being in resignation,
[00:20:44] any questioning of that means we are on the wrong track, not specifically on
[00:20:48] the issue of urban planning, but all other
[00:20:51] decisions, so the government has been functioning since my resignation
[00:20:55] and we waited for a new government to be appointed, we did not want the system
[00:20:59] to stop functioning and it did not stop, in fact, quite the opposite,
[00:21:03] things that waited 40
[00:21:06] years, this from the last
[00:21:10] adopted one or from 2015 when it
[00:21:12] expired, we in this period adopted
[00:21:15] that act, an act that was started long before,
[00:21:19] so... "It was inevitable that it had to be passed, it would have been passed if there hadn't
[00:21:23] been various malicious obstructions that
[00:21:26] happened, which exactly and why right now before
[00:21:30] the elections, it seems like you're rushing, maybe you're not
[00:21:33] rushing, so this document was supposed to be
[00:21:37] adopted last year, however, mm Mr. Mayor
[00:21:40] Efendić of Novi Grad initiated a constitutional appeal,
[00:21:44] the Constitutional Court considered it and ruled in favor of the Canton of Sarajevo, so that
[00:21:47] we... but it's not the only local community and the only controversial
[00:21:51] uh, we are not talking about initiating a constitutional appeal, when
[00:21:55] the proposal was adopted, uh
[00:21:58] when the public discussion was over, that
[00:22:02] document went to the municipalities and the city, that is a completely
[00:22:05] different step which is only for
[00:22:09] giving opinions by local communities, so I'm coming back to
[00:22:13] the beginning, a very high-quality document,
[00:22:16] a document that was adopted by the profession, so it was not adopted by the government in resignation
[00:22:20] mm or or politics, this document was adopted by the profession,
[00:22:24] at the head of the council of the urban plan was
[00:22:27] and still is emeritus uh Jelena
[00:22:30] Žuljić, the profession that you chose,
[00:22:33] that's right so that's a procedure
[00:22:36] that also cared about this city getting its
[00:22:40] modern appearance so that it does not disrupt what is
[00:22:42] the basis of living in every
[00:22:46] European center addressed you.
[00:22:50] "The Association of Architects sent a series of its
[00:22:53] demands, I received information from them that you did not
[00:22:56] respond to those demands, mm, why, mm, that's not
[00:23:02] the cabinet, mm, the Institute for Planning is the one who
[00:23:06] works on the urban plan and all other similar documents, and
[00:23:10] their demands, I assume, went to the Institute for
[00:23:13] Planning, not
[00:23:16] to the cabinet, policies, government, and ministries.
[00:23:20] I don't believe they were not answered, given that in the explanation
[00:23:23] of the entire document, which is a thousand pages long, all the answers were
[00:23:27] given in the public debate, and I don't see why you wouldn't have adopted some of
[00:23:31] their demands, uh, some of the demands were adopted,
[00:23:35] those that were, so the council adopted the demands,
[00:23:38] so the council consists of professionals, members of
[00:23:41] the association, so these are people who were professors,
[00:23:45] probably to some of those you
[00:23:48] are now talking about.
[00:23:50] and I'm talking about more people within the Association of Architects
[00:23:54] and an independent citizens' association, that's right, that's right,
[00:23:57] we have very good relations, well, we have another project we're working on together,
[00:24:00] that's the impression, but let me continue, experts,
[00:24:04] although associations have been warning for years that the
[00:24:07] new plan continues brutal concretization, we
[00:24:11] have seen that many times, you have seen it in our program, especially
[00:24:14] environmental associations that try to draw attention
[00:24:18] to air corridors. We have been hearing about this
[00:24:22] for years, and we see
[00:24:25] with our own eyes what happened after the closure of certain
[00:24:28] in the capital of Bosnia and Herzegovina along the main road,
[00:24:32] especially. Have you saved Sarajevo with this plan, or have you perhaps
[00:24:35] capitulated before the construction
[00:24:39] lobby? Mm, so there is no construction lobby, there is only
[00:24:43] the profession, the profession exists in every country in construction, no, but in this document it does not
[00:24:46] exist, so in this document there is a profession, and I can say... and
[00:24:50] one environmental association that is the loudest on this issue, they are
[00:24:53] aware that in the new urban plan, so
[00:24:56] there is no increase in building plots
[00:24:59] in the new urban plan that the
[00:25:02] government adopted last week, there are rules that did not
[00:25:06] exist, if those rules had existed in 2010,
[00:25:09] 2015, 97, we would not
[00:25:12] have these mastodons that are there today, so therefore
[00:25:16] a limitation is sought - from the coefficient of built-up
[00:25:19] area of the plot to a maximum value of three
[00:25:23] and construction up to a maximum height of 20 m. You say we wouldn't have
[00:25:26] these buildings in the Sarajevo valley that choke
[00:25:30] us, does that mean we won't have
[00:25:34] any more construction of buildings
[00:25:38] higher than 20
[00:25:40] m in that area, which would directly worsen the quality?
[00:25:44] So, in the UP, the height of buildings was not
[00:25:47] the subject of debate, but rather
[00:25:50] urban rules that were adopted, among other things,
[00:25:53] urban rules define coefficients of built-up area,
[00:25:57] these are unique rules certainly
[00:26:00] 10 times better than it was. And what will be clear in the next period
[00:26:04] has been abandoned from the construction of a building
[00:26:07] 50 meters high in Novi Sarajevo, how do you think,
[00:26:11] it has been abandoned, has it been abandoned, I ask you, the urban plan does not
[00:26:15] define the regulatory plan,
[00:26:18] quadrant C, if we are referring to quadrant C that was at the city
[00:26:21] council, mm, the voting on
[00:26:25] that regulatory plan was abandoned, or it was not put to a vote, if we are thinking
[00:26:29] about that document, yes, so it was not, it was not put to a vote.
[00:26:32] Of the city council, the regulatory plan for quadrant C,
[00:26:36] what does that mean in practice? In practice,
[00:26:38] it means it was not even considered at the city council session. The mayor withdrew that
[00:26:42] document. Will it be built? At the
[00:26:45] moment, according to the current regulatory plan, it can be
[00:26:48] built, if a new regulatory one is adopted, it will be possible to build again.
[00:26:51] The regulatory plan defines
[00:26:54] the number of floors of buildings in that area.
[00:26:57] The urban plan has a slightly broader picture and it
[00:27:01] defines mm... rules for construction in a certain
[00:27:04] locality, so what it needs to be
[00:27:07] social, social
[00:27:09] property, what needs to be residential,
[00:27:12] business, what are the construction coefficients and so on, so
[00:27:16] the urban plan has mm a broader picture
[00:27:19] of a location, it doesn't go so much into microlocation, mm,
[00:27:23] after the urban plan, regulatory plans are adopted which
[00:27:26] define whether something is 21 meters or
[00:27:29] 28 meters or and so on and so forth. We will also talk about
[00:27:33] the demands of the municipalities towards the Sarajevo
[00:27:36] Canton and their objections, but what
[00:27:40] you are also being reproached for is that this document is trying to
[00:27:43] legalize disputed buildings,
[00:27:46] projects that so far have not, have not had legal coverage, is there
[00:27:50] any truth in that, no, so everything we have talked about so far
[00:27:53] are these insinuations of people who probably have not read
[00:27:57] the document, people who do not have the knowledge to
[00:28:01] talk about this document, I don't know now.
[00:28:03] To mention the regulatory plan quadrant C and the number of floors and to connect
[00:28:07] it with the UP, so there is no connection
[00:28:10] there, the regulatory, or rather the urban plan is a plan
[00:28:13] that foresees a vision, you say that the urban plan
[00:28:17] that you adopted has nothing to do with the construction of quadrant
[00:28:21] C? It does, it does have to do with it, but in this specific case, something was at
[00:28:24] the city council in July or June, so that has nothing to do with this document,
[00:28:28] with this document that was adopted by the government seven days ago and that will be at the assembly
[00:28:31] next time. So, these are two documents that mm have no
[00:28:35] connection with each other, this document has
[00:28:38] a broader picture, this document defines the development of our
[00:28:42] city, it defines new
[00:28:44] park areas that will happen in our city, we will have a
[00:28:48] beautiful park, probably the most beautiful that will happen
[00:28:52] at the confluence in our confluence in the northwest
[00:28:55] part of our city where 500,000
[00:28:58] trees will be planted for every inhabitant,
[00:29:01] there will be a green mm... transversal that will connect
[00:29:05] that park, it will connect with the park forest
[00:29:08] Sedrenik, Žuć and Hum, so we are talking only about that
[00:29:12] green part, it is planned to plant 65 km
[00:29:16] of double-sided tree-lined streets in Sarajevo Canton mm
[00:29:19] plant, new park areas are planned in
[00:29:22] the grass area currently, when the grass is moved, a park goes there
[00:29:26] in Vasomiskin black
[00:29:28] part will be a park, there will be a park in
[00:29:32] as part of the campus in Marin Dvor, so we are talking about those green
[00:29:36] areas that are much larger than what the previous
[00:29:39] regulatory urban plan covered, this
[00:29:43] urban plan covers the development of our traffic, there are
[00:29:47] two new lines, one towards Dobrinja, the other goes towards Azići and
[00:29:50] Dobroševići, a trolleybus line towards mm
[00:29:53] Dobroševići and Azići, a railway line
[00:29:57] that will extend after the main railway
[00:30:00] station through Hum. further towards Vogošća,
[00:30:04] also a railway line that goes along the eastern side of the airport
[00:30:07] towards Brdo Moji, so that is the concept of the urban plan that
[00:30:11] represents the vision of this city, it does not enter a little bit about
[00:30:15] the promenade along Miljacka, the profession
[00:30:18] says that it was not really observed
[00:30:21] within the regulated
[00:30:25] riverbed, it was somehow rigidly observed
[00:30:28] and they don't see that there is any activation of the riverbank,
[00:30:31] construction. of the promenade,
[00:30:34] what we wished would happen right at this
[00:30:37] location, if we are talking about the location of the promenade
[00:30:41] and the extension of Wilson's Promenade, that is defined by the regulatory plans
[00:30:45] quadrant B, which needs to be
[00:30:48] adopted, I don't know why it is not adopted by the council, I was
[00:30:51] a city council member maybe ten years ago, when that
[00:30:55] regulatory plan was in draft and the problem then was
[00:30:59] its'...