N1BOS — broadcast
20261105 073000 UTC
528 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] critical trends, as we saw in
[00:00:03] 2024, that is, that the economy was the top
[00:00:06] issue for voters
[00:00:09] of that federal state, let's say, at in the USA. Uh, in the 2024
[00:00:12] election, that narrative, that
[00:00:15] commitment, this, let's say, fixation of voters, of course,
[00:00:19] also went against the Democratic party in this
[00:00:22] cycle, this uh, is it a huge
[00:00:26] huge plus for that same party? So I think that's in... "at
[00:00:30] this moment, in these global and globally
[00:00:33] economic circumstances, it's a simple fact. We saw similar
[00:00:36] things in some other countries that had
[00:00:40] elections in this period of about two or three months. So
[00:00:44] this is a global wave to some extent,
[00:00:47] and I think that it will
[00:00:50] probably similarly characterize
[00:00:54] the next presidential elections in
[00:00:58] for the
[00:01:02] Republican party, now it
[00:01:04] will be a big job for them to
[00:01:07] distance themselves from this president and the agenda that, at this
[00:01:11] moment, at least, seems to have totally collapsed
[00:01:14] and failed in a political sense
[00:01:18] for all those possible future candidates who will seek,
[00:01:21] right, to establish themselves as
[00:01:24] a Republican alternative, uh,
[00:01:27] a big, big job ahead of them. We saw
[00:01:30] yesterday on social media that Trump felt the need to announce with a
[00:01:34] "good morning" and a reminder that he is still president
[00:01:37] in the United States of America. So,
[00:01:41] Trump remained in the White House after the elections, but he lost
[00:01:45] Congress. How difficult will it actually be in practice
[00:01:48] to implement his policies in the next two
[00:01:50] years?
[00:01:53] Well, look, I think we have to emphasize that this previous Congress, which was
[00:01:57] under the total control of Republicans and... the Senate in the
[00:02:00] presidential house, is considered one of the most
[00:02:03] unproductive Congresses in modern
[00:02:06] American history. So, the smallest
[00:02:10] number of significant laws were passed during
[00:02:13] that mandate, and now, as for the
[00:02:17] laws that will, let's say,
[00:02:20] be among those laws for President Trump to be the key architect,
[00:02:24] there's actually nothing of that. I mean, the President did
[00:02:27] say ... to some extent, he is
[00:02:30] ready to cooperate and agree
[00:02:34] with the Democrats. And there might even be a
[00:02:37] need, at least concerning some, let's say, basic
[00:02:40] budgetary issues, for some kind of agreement to be reached.
[00:02:44] But in terms of a real political
[00:02:47] agenda, there will actually be nothing
[00:02:50] in the next two years. What will dominate politics,
[00:02:54] at least from the side of Congress, will actually be those... various
[00:02:58] investigations, hearings,
[00:03:02] reports, and so on, about everything
[00:03:05] the Democrats talked about
[00:03:09] during the campaign. So, their belief that this is
[00:03:12] a corrupt president, that the people around him are corrupt,
[00:03:16] and even in the context of
[00:03:19] attention to the Western Balkans, a few weeks ago
[00:03:22] we had that report which was published
[00:03:26] by the foreign policy council of the Democrats in the presidential
[00:03:30] house, uh, whose key author was Mr.
[00:03:33] President, uh, William Keating,
[00:03:37] which, you know, concerns alleged
[00:03:40] affairs, let's say, because we still don't know all the
[00:03:43] facts, but about those accusations that
[00:03:47] there were some, let's say, political malversations in
[00:03:51] the context of lifting sanctions for Mr.
[00:03:54] Dodik, uh, the realization
[00:03:57] of the Southern Interconnection project, i.e., the integration
[00:04:00] of the AFS company into
[00:04:04] relevant legislation in the entity of the Federation. So these are
[00:04:07] things that Democrats will definitely re-examine in this
[00:04:11] mandate, similar affairs in other countries around the world
[00:04:14] where it is claimed that Trump's family, or some
[00:04:18] close associates, had - I repeat - those
[00:04:22] corrupt agendas. So that
[00:04:25] will dominate American politics for the next two years.
[00:04:28] So you and other analysts have
[00:04:32] said in the previous period that the war with Iran, economic
[00:04:35] pressures, rising prices, political burdens for the administration,
[00:04:39] we can conclude that these very topics decided the elections. How much
[00:04:43] space will the Democratic majority actually have to influence
[00:04:46] the foreign policy of the United
[00:04:49] States? So, considering that the president
[00:04:53] still holds key
[00:04:54] powers,
[00:04:58] of course, however, Congress still... has significant authority in that
[00:05:01] regard. I believe that we will already in the next few
[00:05:05] days, maybe even see a
[00:05:09] reaction specifically regarding the mandate
[00:05:13] and leadership of Mr.
[00:05:16] who is the Secretary of Defense of the USA. We already have some
[00:05:19] announcements even from this
[00:05:23] from some Republicans who are terribly
[00:05:26] bitter about Mr. Gaksath because they
[00:05:29] accuse him of, you know, poor leadership
[00:05:33] of the military campaign, the campaign against Iran in that war in
[00:05:36] the Persian Gulf, that it actually cost the president and
[00:05:40] the Republican party their dominance. Uh, in
[00:05:43] Congress, so it is quite possible that
[00:05:47] Peit Hegseth will not be
[00:05:50] Secretary of Defense of the USA for much longer,
[00:05:53] and I think probably if
[00:05:57] he is removed from office, either by
[00:06:00] Congress through that so-called impeachment
[00:06:04] process, or if President Trump will
[00:06:08] actually fire him, whatever
[00:06:11] happens, I think it will just
[00:06:14] be the first in a series of departures from this
[00:06:17] administration that are yet to come, because
[00:06:21] rarely anyone will want to stay in an administration that
[00:06:24] will be under a kind of political siege
[00:06:28] for these next two years, at least at this
[00:06:32] moment, I mean, let's say, that mainstream
[00:06:35] political logic, although I think it's too early to think
[00:06:39] and speculate like this, uh, I think the result."
[00:06:42] The Democratic Party's results were so dominant
[00:06:46] and historically significant last night, or the
[00:06:50] night before last, no, last night, I apologize, this,
[00:06:53] that it is probably already expected at this moment that
[00:06:56] in 2028, a Democrat
[00:07:00] will win the race for the White House.
[00:07:04] To some extent, it might not even matter who it is, that's how their
[00:07:08] performance was last night, that was their
[00:07:11] success.
[00:07:13] "What were the most interesting or most unexpected
[00:07:16] moments of these midterm elections
[00:07:18] in the United States, in your personal opinion? We listened to and watched
[00:07:22] with great attention the speech
[00:07:26] of the newly elected senator in
[00:07:29] Michigan, Elsayed, and
[00:07:32] the fact that someone of his origin
[00:07:35] and background managed to enter
[00:07:38] the Senate. How surprising is that to you?" "And
[00:07:42] how do you interpret it? I assume you heard his speech, perhaps you
[00:07:46] could relate to his story at times,
[00:07:48] given that you are
[00:07:52] also of foreign origin in America?" "Perhaps you could relate to his story
[00:07:56] at times, right?"
[00:07:59] Well, you see, I think it must be emphasized that Mr. Elsayed is a native-born
[00:08:03] American, although of course he has roots from
[00:08:06] the African-Arab world. Uh, on one
[00:08:09] hand, it must also be said that he was quite... I won't say controversial
[00:08:12] candidate, uh, because I think
[00:08:16] that was some criticism, and I think it was mostly
[00:08:19] malicious criticism from some Republicans, uh,
[00:08:23] that quite - I repeat -
[00:08:26] truly malicious accusations that the man is a terrorist,
[00:08:30] extremist, Islamist, or whatever. I mean, that's totally
[00:08:33] absurd. But on the other hand, it must be said that he was
[00:08:37] a pretty bad candidate, that it is now actually possible that some other
[00:08:40] Democrat in that position... would have achieved a slightly more significant
[00:08:44] result. But then again, it must be said that
[00:08:48] this is still a historic event, mm.
[00:08:50] The first person of Arab and Muslim origin who will be in
[00:08:54] the American Senate. So that is in the context of,
[00:08:58] let's say, a pluralistic, democratic,
[00:09:01] liberal society, it is always desirable to have more
[00:09:04] people from different uh, you know,
[00:09:08] from different parts of the world, experiences,
[00:09:11] cultures, and so on. As for the broader
[00:09:15] picture, I'll say again that these results,
[00:09:18] specifically in Mississippi, where every vote is literally
[00:09:22] counted, or the difference is so minimal, at least at this
[00:09:25] moment, are also an incredible result
[00:09:28] in South Carolina. Then, for example, if we look at
[00:09:32] Texas, not only did Mr. Talarico and Ms.
[00:09:35] Hinojosa win their races for
[00:09:39] the positions of senator and governor, but when you
[00:09:42] look down the ballot, let's say,
[00:09:46] you see that Democrats dominate
[00:09:49] at a simply incredible rate
[00:09:52] of dominance. I mean, in a state that until two days ago
[00:09:56] was under absolute
[00:09:58] multi-generational control of Republicans, 30 plus
[00:10:02] years Republicans have dominated there. In the
[00:10:06] case of Kansas, since 1932,
[00:10:10] not a single Democrat had ever been elected. movement at the level of that federal
[00:10:14] state. For example, then in North Carolina
[00:10:17] where I even lived a few years ago, so I'm somewhat
[00:10:21] familiar with the details of the politics of that federal state.
[00:10:25] Uh, so, Democrats have almost taken over all
[00:10:28] representative positions
[00:10:30] at the level
[00:10:34] the level of federal Congress. So these are really
[00:10:37] these are, I repeat, generational, historical
[00:10:40] successes for the Democratic Party, and we'll see, of course, what they'll be
[00:10:44] able to do with that in the next two years, whether they'll be able
[00:10:48] to build also a generational political
[00:10:51] movement that will be able to cement their
[00:10:55] results and
[00:10:57] victories from last night. During the campaign itself
[00:11:01] in the previous period, we often heard that, for example,
[00:11:04] every time Americans passed a gas
[00:11:08] station, it was like an anti-Republican advertisement, or a Democratic
[00:11:11] advertisement, when citizens saw the
[00:11:15] gas prices. You also mentioned how much the focus was
[00:11:19] on the economy, how much economic
[00:11:22] topics dominated and somewhat decided these
[00:11:26] mid-term elections. What other topics, when we talk
[00:11:29] about life in America, are
[00:11:33] also problematic for people,
[00:11:36] what can be heard there in the public sphere as a desire
[00:11:40] for change? Uh,
[00:11:43] if you were to talk about those most important, perhaps
[00:11:46] negative aspects of life in America, and
[00:11:50] about everything that is actually an important
[00:11:54] change in relation to some previous years or
[00:11:57] decades in America, what would you
[00:11:59] single out?
[00:12:02] I think what happened last night
[00:12:06] was a kind of referendum
[00:12:09] uh, on the question of how younger voters
[00:12:13] in America see their opportunities, what opportunities
[00:12:16] they see for themselves in this existing
[00:12:19] America. Unfortunately, I think a huge number of them
[00:12:23] concluded that the current,
[00:12:27] right, current prospects are extremely bad for them, that
[00:12:30] a uh a systematic
[00:12:33] change is needed. So, uh, life in
[00:12:37] America has become extremely expensive.
[00:12:40] Uh, opportunities for economic
[00:12:43] uh self-realization, let's
[00:12:46] say, uh, what Americans
[00:12:49] are used to, uh, has become increasingly
[00:12:53] difficult, mm. All those statistical
[00:12:56] studies, surveys,
[00:12:59] and numbers indicate that
[00:13:02] this will probably be one of the first generations that
[00:13:06] will, in an absolute economic sense, have a
[00:13:09] harder, or rather, worse life than their
[00:13:12] parents. So these are those some
[00:13:16] small signs, indicators of why there
[00:13:19] was such a significant, let's
[00:13:23] say, radical turnaround among
[00:13:27] voters in the USA. Then when you add
[00:13:30] some other, well, I wouldn't say details, but additional
[00:13:34] facts, not just inflation, but, for example, that while a
[00:13:38] huge number of American voters and citizens are really
[00:13:41] struggling for survival, especially people in the middle class
[00:13:45] and lower middle class,
[00:13:47] for whom life has truly become
[00:13:51] too expensive, even in some states that
[00:13:54] were, until a few years ago, relatively
[00:13:57] economically stable, were not
[00:14:01] terribly expensive, like, for example, California where I live, which was
[00:14:05] always known for being expensive, and suddenly even
[00:14:09] that part of America has become, has become extremely
[00:14:12] expensive. When you have to pay five
[00:14:16] or six dollars for a
[00:14:19] gallon of gas in some Kansas or Iowa, that
[00:14:22] is, that is dramatic, it is dramatic.
[00:14:25] In California, until the beginning of this war with
[00:14:28] Iran, gasoline was still quite
[00:14:32] expensive, around 4 to 4.5 dollars per gallon.
[00:14:35] So now for us in California, when the price is around
[00:14:39] 6 dollars, it can still be
[00:14:42] tolerated. However, when your gas jumps from two dollars
[00:14:46] to five or six in some Kansas or Iowa,
[00:14:49] where the average salaries are
[00:14:53] much lower, that is and." That still has a much
[00:14:56] greater impact. Then, I repeat, you add to
[00:15:00] that the fact that you have people
[00:15:03] like Elon Musk, who is so close to President Trump, who
[00:15:06] becomes the richest man
[00:15:09] ever, that he is not the only one
[00:15:13] at the same time when Americans are fighting for, let's
[00:15:16] say, economic survival, at the same time you have a president
[00:15:20] who builds those luxury
[00:15:23] halls, for some reason unclear to anyone,
[00:15:27] we see those images every day from his
[00:15:30] resort in Florida. So these are
[00:15:34] these are, these are bad scenes, these are bad."
[00:15:37] contrasts for a president and for a political
[00:15:40] movement that, in 2024,
[00:15:43] and even in 2016, built itself
[00:15:46] on that narrative that they are
[00:15:49] champions, that they are avatars of the so-called
[00:15:53] forgotten man, as Mr. Trump claimed. So,
[00:15:57] in these past two years, it absolutely did
[00:16:00] not seem, I think, to most Americans that Mr.
[00:16:04] Trump and the Republican party, uh,
[00:16:07] were political actors who really cared
[00:16:10] too much about the status of the average
[00:16:14] American voter or citizen. We could
[00:16:17] hear Trump who still says that if I were on that
[00:16:21] ballot, they would have circled me.
[00:16:24] Do you think he honestly believes what he says, or
[00:16:27] are these elections still the beginning of the end of Trump's political
[00:16:31] dominance, or can we still expect that he will
[00:16:34] remain the Republican favorite for political direction after
[00:16:37] 2028? You
[00:16:41] see, Mr. Trump, as a political candidate and
[00:16:45] as a political actor, is a bit strange, because he has always been
[00:16:48] extremely unpopular, even when he
[00:16:50] won, he was extremely unpopular.
[00:16:54] Hmm, in that sense, there is that political specificity in
[00:16:58] him, mm, perhaps it is somewhat, it can be described, perhaps as
[00:17:01] his political, political genius in the sense that
[00:17:05] he, despite that, what is objectively
[00:17:09] unpopular, was from the first day he appeared
[00:17:12] in 2015, 2016, and he
[00:17:15] still achieved significant political results, that is
[00:17:18] undeniable. However,
[00:17:21] uh, political gravity still exists, and
[00:17:24] everything comes to an end. I think that
[00:17:27] even some smarter Republicans, mm,
[00:17:31] in 2020, at the end of 2024, when he
[00:17:35] of course won his second
[00:17:38] mandate, and when Republicans quite
[00:17:41] unexpectedly achieved majorities in both houses
[00:17:45] of Congress, there were many of those Republicans who
[00:17:49] truly did not expect that result, and to some extent,
[00:17:52] they feared everything that followed,
[00:17:55] that Mr. Trump concluded after November,
[00:17:59] November 24th, that he had some kind of carte blanche
[00:18:03] mandate to totally reform
[00:18:06] this. The US as a state political
[00:18:10] project and concept in his ideological
[00:18:13] view, of course, it turned out in the end
[00:18:16] that they did not have the capacity
[00:18:19] to do it to the end as they
[00:18:23] wanted, far from it in fact. On the other
[00:18:26] hand, such
[00:18:29] a belief was actually extremely
[00:18:32] unpopular even among many Republicans in
[00:18:35] Congress, precisely because of that, this Congress was
[00:18:39] one of the most unproductive in modern American
[00:18:43] history, because the Republicans themselves were
[00:18:46] in fact a brake
[00:18:49] on some of the most radical, most extreme demands
[00:18:52] that came from the White House, some of his
[00:18:56] most terrible allies
[00:19:00] in Congress. So,
[00:19:01] uh,
[00:19:04] America has a very special political system. And
[00:19:08] uh, which is by its design, right, intentionally
[00:19:11] divided, and it is very difficult for someone
[00:19:15] who represents one
[00:19:18] or the other political extreme, uh, to
[00:19:21] totally take over that political system,
[00:19:25] to totally this, from
[00:19:28] its foundations, right, to collapse it and make something else. That's
[00:19:31] that's that simply this system doesn't allow that, and although,
[00:19:35] of course, it must be said that mm... Mr. Trump did
[00:19:39] a lot to really jeopardize, I think,
[00:19:42] the democratic integrity of the American republic, but now, of course,
[00:19:46] we will see if there will be some kind of
[00:19:49] turnaround, or rather, some kind of renewal, not just in the next
[00:19:53] two years, but I think in this next decade
[00:19:56] that will follow, mm, after a decade
[00:20:00] that was dominated by Mr. Trump and
[00:20:03] his political movement. And for
[00:20:06] the end, Mr. Janović, let's focus
[00:20:09] a little more on not just the Western Balkans, specifically
[00:20:13] on Bosnia and Herzegovina. So, you've already mentioned, you particularly highlighted
[00:20:17] the lifting of American sanctions against Milorad Dodik. When
[00:20:21] do you expect that issue to come to the agenda
[00:20:24] in Congress, and what changes can we actually expect
[00:20:28] in Bosnia and Herzegovina after these, after these elections, when
[00:20:32] we talk about the relationship
[00:20:35] of the United States with Bosnia and Herzegovina?
[00:20:39] Well, first of all, I must emphasize that when we talk about changes,
[00:20:43] changes in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the responsibility for that lies primarily
[00:20:47] with the political leadership in BiH
[00:20:50] and the voters in Bosnia and Herzegovina. And here I must mention
[00:20:53] that I am terribly upset, sorry, and sad
[00:20:57] that so few voters in Bosnia and
[00:21:00] Herzegovina turned out for the previous elections, and
[00:21:04] at the same time, we see what the turnout was
[00:21:07] in Hungary, in Serbia, in Israel, in the USA. So
[00:21:11] people who expect something different from
[00:21:15] their society and their political representatives in almost all
[00:21:19] other democratic countries around the world,
[00:21:22] they vote, even if they believe they live in autocratic societies
[00:21:26] like it was in Hungary and Serbia, they
[00:21:29] vote in elections. That didn't happen in Bosnia and
[00:21:32] Herzegovina, and I think one really should
[00:21:35] be ashamed of that, it must be said like that, unfortunately,
[00:21:39] I say. However, what you asked me about
[00:21:42] American politics, you see, I think the issue of sanctions for
[00:21:46] Milorad Dodik will definitely soon be on the
[00:21:50] Congress's agenda. Of course, Congress cannot
[00:21:53] define or change the US sanctions
[00:21:56] policy. However, it can make it a
[00:22:00] rather painful political issue for this administration
[00:22:04] in a period that will generally be quite politically painful for them.
[00:22:07] So, I'm somewhat convinced, if I may
[00:22:11] say so, it's more a question of
[00:22:15] time until sanctions
[00:22:19] are reimposed on Milorad Dodik, not whether
[00:22:22] they will be reimposed. In the worst case, it will have to wait for the
[00:22:26] next presidential
[00:22:30] administration, but I think it is
[00:22:32] not impossible that they will be reimposed even
[00:22:36] during this, let's say, final
[00:22:39] part of Mr. Trump's mandate, because
[00:22:43] simply, almost a year,
[00:22:46] more than a year after the lifting
[00:22:50] of those sanctions, only political problems followed
[00:22:53] for the administration and for the Republicans due to that
[00:22:57] fact. And even today we still don't have
[00:23:00] a coherent argument from the State Department and
[00:23:03] various representatives of the administration as
[00:23:06] to why such a decision was made at all, especially when we see
[00:23:10] Mr. Dodik, who is meeting with Vladimir
[00:23:13] Putin for the tenth time, who
[00:23:16] threatens the citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina, who threatens
[00:23:20] the integrity of BiH, who threatens the integrity of the Dayton
[00:23:23] Peace Agreement. So someone who objectively,
[00:23:27] regarding this discussion, undermines and threatens the
[00:23:30] political and strategic interests of the USA, that such
[00:23:34] a person is removed from the US blacklist,
[00:23:37] I think is, of course, extremely politically
[00:23:41] questionable.
[00:23:43] Thank you very much, Mr. Mujanović, for being our first guest
[00:23:47] this morning. Thank you for this analysis.
[00:23:51] Thank you for the invitation, once again. Jasmin
[00:23:53] Mujanović spoke for "New Day," dear viewers, about the elections in America,
[00:23:57] or rather, the results of the midterm elections, and he reported live
[00:24:01] from Los Angeles. Stay tuned.
[00:24:14] Two years ago, Donald Trump won on the slogan "Make America Great
[00:24:17] Again." Two years later, his actions made America blue
[00:24:21] again. Democrats won Congress in the midterm elections, they have at least
[00:24:25] 54 seats in the Senate and 231 seats in
[00:24:28] the House of Representatives, meaning they have a majority
[00:24:31] in both. The Democratic blue wave
[00:24:35] swept from the East to the West Coast after they won
[00:24:39] the House of Representatives, the Senate, and a large number of gubernatorial races.
[00:24:42] Democrats won the Senate race in Texas for the first time since
[00:24:46] 1988. In this traditionally
[00:24:50] Republican state, they will have a governor who,
[00:24:53] immediately after declaring victory, went to dinner with
[00:24:56] the senator. We have just proven that all the money in this
[00:24:59] world cannot compare to the power of the citizens of Texas. And we
[00:25:03] have just sent a message to every billionaire who makes huge
[00:25:07] political donations, to every corrupt defender of this
[00:25:10] crumbling political system in this state: power
[00:25:14] belongs to the people. There were
[00:25:16] several other historic results. Democrats will have a senator
[00:25:20] from Kansas after 94 years.
[00:25:23] Michigan elected Abdullah Al-Sayed as
[00:25:26] the first Muslim senator.
[00:25:29] Donald, I know my name gives you trouble, so when I
[00:25:33] take the oath in January before JD Vance, you can
[00:25:37] simply call me senator. Peggy
[00:25:40] Flanagan from Minnesota will be the first Native American woman in
[00:25:44] the Senate, and the writing of history was followed by the one who
[00:25:48] most wants to write history.
[00:25:50] Donald Trump's first appearance was expected on Fox
[00:25:53] News, but he does not attribute
[00:25:56] the defeat to himself. I was not on the ballot,
[00:25:58] if I had been, they would have come out to vote.
[00:26:02] Look, they came to rallies, you've never seen such large
[00:26:06] rallies, that's why I'm a little surprised, I thought I could
[00:26:09] transfer the support of those people to the candidates. For
[00:26:13] the Democrats, he immediately had a message on the social network Truth Social,
[00:26:16] he posted a photo of a cap with the inscription
[00:26:19] veto. That is one of the strongest powers
[00:26:23] of the president, they will send crazy proposals, I will
[00:26:26] veto them. Trump also attributed the defeat to the war
[00:26:30] with Iran. Americans are... dissatisfied with prices and
[00:26:34] inflation. Every time an American passes
[00:26:38] a gas station, it's practically like a campaign ad
[00:26:42] for Democrats, because people are paying
[00:26:44] $4.25 for a gallon of gas and I think
[00:26:48] that's what angers them the most. The world, however, was not
[00:26:51] very shaken by the results, yet leaders expect
[00:26:55] some changes. I hope that there will now be more discussion about
[00:26:58] Ukraine, what we can do together to help them.
[00:27:03] Today, democracy won in America, democracy is
[00:27:06] truly incredible, I love democracy, it's something
[00:27:09] truly beautiful. As for relations with
[00:27:13] Serbia, I believe that the strategic dialogue will be able to continue
[00:27:17] depending on the relations of congressmen from Serbia, but
[00:27:20] I congratulate you on what happened in Serbia.
[00:27:24] Dušan Mlađenović,
[00:27:25] N1.
[00:27:39] clean, headache,
[00:27:53] my moments with others make me who I am,
[00:27:56] unique, dm, I'm a human here, I
[00:28:00] shop here, November 27.
[00:28:03] We will donate 5% of the total daily turnover and
[00:28:06] provide support to the work of soup kitchens across Bosnia and
[00:28:09] Herzegovina. Why a three-seater when a six-seater
[00:28:12] is more comfortable? Everything you love, double.
[00:28:16] TV from the region. Wherever
[00:28:18] you save. Pay for three months get three more
[00:28:21] for free. Move Global, Arena Sports, FTV,
[00:28:25] OBM, Hayat, BN and Video club.
[00:28:28] Wherever you are, with Bajic, standard and premium
[00:28:31] packages. No contract over the internet, watch now,
[00:28:35] pay for three months, watch six, move global,
[00:28:39] available worldwide, always choose fresh and
[00:28:41] affordable at Crvena jabuka markets, domestic
[00:28:45] Ajdared apples 1.25, veal
[00:28:48] shoulder and neck 19.95,
[00:28:51] smoked chicken breast 12.95,
[00:28:54] Kokta 1.95,
[00:28:57] Crvena jabuka, a better choice every day for
[00:29:00] 40 years. Drying has never been
[00:29:04] more affordable. Bosch dryer with savings of
[00:29:07] 200 KM and five years warranty. Hurry to
[00:29:11] Domod.
[00:29:19] Stay with us in the continuation of the news, don't miss this story.
[00:29:22] Janis, David, Jenna, Lejla,
[00:29:26] Esma, Adem, Janis and
[00:29:28] Benjamin.
[00:29:41] The reason I resigned is known to you and
[00:29:44] the public:
[00:29:47] one dead, no one guilty, the people remember
[00:29:50] the system. The quick reaction of the fire
[00:29:54] units resulted in the users being quickly
[00:29:57] evacuated.
[00:30:07] You can take everything from me, but I won't give up my
[00:30:09] dignity,
[00:30:12] this people can't
[00:30:14] take it anymore,
[00:30:23] they have their armchairs which are obviously comfortable,
[00:30:27] meaning they, they
[00:30:28] humiliated us.
[00:30:41] While daily reporting on gender-based violence, how
[00:30:45] protected are female journalists and media workers really from sexual
[00:30:49] harassment, pressure, and discrimination? Within the project
[00:30:52] Women in Media, a rulebook on preventing sexual and other forms
[00:30:56] of harassment in newsrooms was developed, a document that offers clear reporting procedures.