N1BOS — broadcast
20261105 100000 UTC
492 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] that they want healthcare workers to be equal and they are demanding,
[00:00:04] therefore, a salary increase. Everything started at 10 AM,
[00:00:07] our Feđa Kulina is there. Feđa, what messages were
[00:00:10] displayed on the banners, what are
[00:00:12] the gathered people saying?
[00:00:16] That's right, Ivana, the protests have just ended. According to a rough
[00:00:20] estimate, there were about a thousand
[00:00:22] healthcare workers from the Canton of
[00:00:25] Sarajevo gathered here. They even called on the minister to come
[00:00:29] and address the gathered people. He came out, indeed, before that he
[00:00:32] addressed us, the media, and after that he came out and said that
[00:00:36] negotiations would continue, but that the coefficients would be
[00:00:40] increased for everyone, but only in January. We will discuss
[00:00:43] this in more detail with the president of the healthcare workers' union,
[00:00:47] Mr. Senat Sadiković is with us, currently.
[00:00:51] Good day, what will happen now, what is your
[00:00:54] comment on what the minister said? Good day, well,
[00:00:58] as you heard, the minister confirmed everything we said
[00:01:02] these days. What we presented is true.
[00:01:05] He confirmed that from January 1st, we will proceed with
[00:01:08] increasing the coefficients for all employees in healthcare. So,
[00:01:12] due to clouds and fog, about in this part, now, we need to maintain it, we need
[00:01:16] to persevere. We have definitely decided that next
[00:01:20] week we will organize a protest march where many more
[00:01:23] of our union members will come out.
[00:01:26] We simply want today to incorporate
[00:01:30] into our collective agreement what was signed with
[00:01:33] the Union of Doctors of Medicine and Dentistry so that
[00:01:37] our members would have this right that was introduced,
[00:01:40] because Masters of Pharmacy who belong to the group
[00:01:43] of doctors in this case cannot get that
[00:01:46] increase due to the non-signing
[00:01:49] of an identical text with our negotiating
[00:01:53] team. So, what bothered me the most
[00:01:57] was that we had a fair discussion from the very beginning
[00:02:00] of negotiations for changes to the collective agreement because
[00:02:03] the Health Insurance Institute allocated
[00:02:07] the maximum amount of funds for salary increases.
[00:02:10] Then that agreement appeared which was signed through mediation
[00:02:14] by doctors of medicine and dentistry. Of course, we support
[00:02:17] the increase, of course everyone should get an increase
[00:02:20] in the Sarajevo Canton because
[00:02:24] the consumer prices are enormous. So, we will see
[00:02:28] what happens next. The main board's position is to go to
[00:02:31] the end. We are ready for every trade union
[00:02:34] step for the satisfaction of all employees in
[00:02:37] healthcare, not just one group of job complexities.
[00:02:40] Today, the government should make a decision to agree to start new
[00:02:44] negotiations for a new collective agreement, also to support
[00:02:48] what the minister said, that our collective agreement should include what has been
[00:02:52] negotiated in the sectoral collective agreement, as well as to, as they
[00:02:55] did with their amendment, include
[00:02:59] everything that has been negotiated, which is the hourly wage,
[00:03:02] the supplement after 10 years, and so on, so that the
[00:03:05] text is identical. And what will happen if the government doesn't
[00:03:09] support it? What are you prepared to do next, what are the next steps?
[00:03:13] Absolutely not, I have no doubt that they will not support it. The government must
[00:03:17] support it. We are a serious union with a large
[00:03:20] number of members who will certainly follow all legal steps and
[00:03:24] procedures and take further steps to make it
[00:03:27] happen. There are absolutely no
[00:03:31] demands at this moment. I am
[00:03:33] also very sorry that the minister made
[00:03:37] some decisions without consulting with the Health
[00:03:40] Insurance Institute because we had an open discussion
[00:03:44] when we were negotiating these changes. We will certainly not
[00:03:47] give up. Next week there will be a protest march, probably with some
[00:03:51] road blockades. I
[00:03:54] call on the citizens of the canton for understanding,
[00:03:57] but we, as a union, are trying with
[00:04:01] all our might with the relevant ministry to
[00:04:04] achieve something and to simply make
[00:04:08] that service better, however, they must give us space in every
[00:04:11] respect. Thank you, that's all, we won't keep
[00:04:15] you any longer. You heard, dear viewers,
[00:04:19] the union announces that they will continue their
[00:04:22] fight for their rights. We will see if the government of Sarajevo
[00:04:25] Canton will accept the minister's proposal
[00:04:28] at today's session. The session is actually ongoing, the
[00:04:32] minister has already left the session, he briefly left to address us,
[00:04:36] the media, and those gathered here. We will see what
[00:04:41] or assisted, according to a happens, if they will accept it. As you heard, the union hopes that they will
[00:04:44] accept it. They are certainly announcing new measures in
[00:04:47] the form of a protest march that could be held
[00:04:51] next week. That's all for this report.
[00:04:55] Thank you, Feđa. Feđa Kulina about the protest of healthcare
[00:04:58] workers in front of the Sarajevo Canton government. The protest started at 10 AM, it
[00:05:02] has just ended. With this,
[00:06:15] Good morning once again, dear viewers. We continue to follow the conditions across Bosnia and
[00:06:19] Herzegovina, which are still gloomy in most of Bosnia, both
[00:06:25] which drivers are especially warned this morning, as visibility is
[00:06:28] still significantly reduced in some places.
[00:06:32] Sunnier conditions are in Herzegovina and the
[00:06:34] southwestern part of Bosnia, where it will be
[00:06:37] sunny for the rest of the day, but we expect more
[00:06:41] sunny periods in the afternoon in the
[00:06:44] rest of Bosnia. The wind is predominantly still
[00:06:47] northeasterly, and that will remain so, blowing with weak to moderate
[00:06:51] intensity, which of course then affects the temperature
[00:06:54] picture. We expect that the maximums will generally go up to
[00:06:58] a maximum of 20 in the Herzegovina region, we see around
[00:07:02] 10 degrees we expect values in
[00:07:05] Bosnia. For the rest of the week, temperatures will be quite similar,
[00:07:09] especially cold will be during the morning
[00:07:12] hours when there will again be fog,
[00:07:15] but towards the weekend, the conditions will be
[00:07:19] somewhat more unstable, so that some rain
[00:07:23] could fall on Saturday and Sunday, especially in Herzegovina and the
[00:07:26] Krajina region.
[00:07:43] Weather information brought to you by
[00:08:16] "I asked at the end, I said, why did no one question, why did no one check what
[00:08:20] he was doing, and they said because he was a senior trusted officer? We're
[00:08:24] going to hear Molly's story of police sexual
[00:08:27] misconduct in Cambridge here. Nationally, it's becoming increasingly
[00:08:30] common, and while there's been much scrutiny of London's force in recent years, in
[00:08:34] the first analysis of its kind, Sky News has found rural areas are
[00:08:38] no better, sometimes worse. Sexual
[00:08:41] allegations..." officers across England and Wales have doubled in two
[00:08:45] years, from 574 to
[00:08:47] 1,239. Sexual complaints logged by police
[00:08:51] forces over a three-year period show forces covering rural
[00:08:55] areas have much higher scores, adjusted for four size,
[00:08:58] 13 of the top 15, with the Metropolitan
[00:09:01] police below average, and from January 2022 to September
[00:09:05] 2026, we found that in Cambridger more than half of
[00:09:09] hearings against officers involved sexual misconduct.
[00:09:13] highest proportion of any force in England and
[00:09:15] Wales, what what has been going on by sounds of it
[00:09:19] a fairly industrial scale is officers
[00:09:22] who who see the opportunities of going and
[00:09:26] visiting um women a particularly vulnerable
[00:09:30] points. Molly's is one of those stories in Cambridgesia
[00:09:34] which began with knock on the door.
[00:09:38] A friend advised her to talk to a police officer after she confided
[00:09:41] to her, she'd been a victim of group-based sexual
[00:09:45] abuse. the male officer was part of their social
[00:09:48] circle. he said something like other people that aren't in
[00:09:52] the police are very emotional about these things and probably aren't the best
[00:09:55] people to speak to. police officer James Thorne was an
[00:09:59] expert in traffic collisions at Cambridge at police with no training
[00:10:03] in sexual abuse cases. we get between 85
[00:10:06] and 95 fatal road traffic collisions. Molly didn't want Thorn
[00:10:10] to make an official report but
[00:10:12] Over several meetings she told him what happened to her and in this time
[00:10:16] she says he also made advances. Was there any
[00:10:19] part of you that was falling for him? I really
[00:10:23] relied on him, but that wasn't... yeah, not because I wanted anything to
[00:10:27] happen, or not because I particularly liked him in that
[00:10:30] way. She says after walking up secluded
[00:10:33] hill while he was on duty, things turned sexual. I didn't
[00:10:37] give the impression that that's what I wanted to do, but I just went along with
[00:10:40] it, and I kind of tried to say to him, like I'm really
[00:10:44] embarrassed, anyone could walk past, and he said, well, you know,
[00:10:47] I'm the police officer in uniform with my out. Did you say
[00:10:51] to him, look, this isn't what I want from this relationship, what we'.
[00:10:55] you communicating to him, but I was uncomfortable, I kind
[00:10:59] of, I probably should have been clearer, but because I wouldn't
[00:11:02] ever have said no, anyway, I wouldn't ever
[00:11:05] feel like I could be in that position to say no. Thorn said the relationship was
[00:11:08] consentual and began months after her disclosure, he denied
[00:11:12] having sex on duty, but he resigned ahead of a police misconduct
[00:11:16] hearing, which found that while she developed strong feelings for him, also
[00:11:19] found he was willfully blind to the obvious
[00:11:22] vulnerability of Molly, named as miss a... 'and there was
[00:11:26] regular and repeated behavior in respect to sexual
[00:11:29] activity on duty, the panel concluded it was gross
[00:11:33] misconduct, and should he have remained a serving officer, he would have been
[00:11:36] dismissed. what's what's been the impact on
[00:11:40] you all of this? that i don't trust anybody and that i don't
[00:11:44] trust myself, the police, the police are
[00:11:47] terrifying. the chief constable of Cambridger police
[00:11:51] said inspector Thorn went down an entirely unacceptable'.
[00:11:55] path, he abused his position as a police officer for sexual
[00:11:59] purpose and undermined public confidence in the
[00:12:02] police. But did the force themselves make matters
[00:12:05] worse? For example, while under investigation, police agreed he could
[00:12:09] continue a safeguarding roll for local baseball team. He
[00:12:13] wasn't suspended from the force, he received an award while under
[00:12:16] investigation, and he was chosen to be a scrutiny
[00:12:20] panel judging the actions of other officers, which came to
[00:12:24] police. admitted was a mistake, and how did you feel
[00:12:27] about that? like they were just protecting James, that the police
[00:12:31] are just like they say, one big family that protect their
[00:12:34] own, but there's more to this, which raises questions over
[00:12:37] how Thorn was able to keep his relationship with Molly
[00:12:41] secret. three weeks after her disclosure, he submitted what's called an
[00:12:44] N-100, a crime report into her alleged abuse. so
[00:12:48] why then was she not contacted by specialist
[00:12:51] officers? it says so on the top of the crime report, it says:
[00:12:55] act must only go through James Thorn, so it's the first thing that you can
[00:12:58] see when you open the crime report. Despite a subject access
[00:13:01] request, Cambridge the police won't release a copy of the report and have told Sky
[00:13:05] News its part of new investigation into Thorn.
[00:13:08] He denies requesting being the soul point of contact saying
[00:13:12] he only asked to be kept updated to offer her
[00:13:15] support, but he never heard anything, but nor did
[00:13:18] she? I think it should have been looked at criminally for misconduct in
[00:13:21] public office. This sort of conduct where you you use. your
[00:13:25] position as a police officer to gain benefit, you know,
[00:13:29] by way of sexual relationship, is
[00:13:31] defined as a form of corruption, that that is potentially a
[00:13:35] criminal offense. in September, two Cambridger police officers were
[00:13:39] jailed at the Old Bailey for misconduct in public office,
[00:13:42] in part for sharing sexual images from suspect's
[00:13:46] phone. 11 other officers from the same unit were
[00:13:49] also disciplined. the judge described toxic
[00:13:52] culture. let's not forget the...
[00:13:55] began with Molly disclosing horrific crimes, her
[00:13:58] alleged sexual abuses are still at large, never
[00:14:02] investigated, the chance missed, her trust
[00:14:06] broken. what worries me is it could happen again to
[00:14:09] you, and you
[00:14:11] would rather that than go to the
[00:14:15] police? yeah, I would, I'd rather do that for the rest of my
[00:14:18] life than go to the police. I just
[00:14:21] find that intolerable, is there one person? in
[00:14:25] that force who you could go to and talk to? no, and I wouldn't
[00:14:29] put myself in that position. police aren't protecting you, because you
[00:14:33] don't think they believe you or just think they're powerless to do anything, or you're
[00:14:36] afraid of the people. I'll either end up having to sleep with another police
[00:14:40] officer or they won't help. James Thorne is now on
[00:14:43] the police bard list, although his security company offers training to
[00:14:47] first responders to defend against disciplinary action.
[00:14:51] Cambridger police says it can't comment for legal reasons on the ongoing case.
[00:14:55] but it takes all allegations of sexual misconduct extremely seriously
[00:14:59] and will investigate them thoroughly. They encourage people to use the
[00:15:02] complaint system to report wrong doing by
[00:15:05] officers. Jason Farrells, sky news.
[00:15:22] AI that could threaten humanity, an internet
[00:15:25] increasingly filled with content created by machines and a
[00:15:29] landmark settlement forcing meta to change how it treats
[00:15:33] young users. technology is moving faster than ever, but
[00:15:36] are we keeping? in this episode we separate fact from fiction.
[00:15:40] could AI go from being a helpful tool to a threat to
[00:15:44] humanity? is the internet heading towards a dead
[00:15:47] web and what does matters 18 billion US dollar
[00:15:50] settlement mean for social media users? let's start shall
[00:15:54] we?
[00:15:57] AI is becoming more capable by the day. some
[00:16:01] critics warn that left unchecked it could pose a threat to
[00:16:04] humanity, but just how much of that? is
[00:16:07] justified, and are there enough guard rails in place to
[00:16:11] keep us safe? let's separate the hype from
[00:16:14] reality. in September, the three biggest AI rivals in the US
[00:16:18] agreed to slow AI development. their
[00:16:22] concern, AI may be advancing faster than safety
[00:16:25] measures can keep up. here are three reasons for the rare
[00:16:28] agreement: first, AI is becoming
[00:16:31] powerful, safety measures can't keep up. today's AI can
[00:16:35] carry out advanced cybertasks.
[00:16:37] in recent safety tests, AI systems bypassed
[00:16:40] restrictions, accessed platforms that weren't supposed to
[00:16:43] reach and even tried to avoid detection. this means AI
[00:16:47] capabilities may be advancing faster than safety measures can
[00:16:51] keep up, but
[00:16:54] this was just a plan test conducted under specific test conditions,
[00:16:58] and in this case they simply took the risk that something might happen, but
[00:17:02] that was human decision, and i think we really need to keep firmly in mind that it
[00:17:06] didn't have much to do with.
[00:17:09] Second, what happens when AI creates the next
[00:17:12] generation of AI? Anthropic CEO Dario
[00:17:16] Amadai worries AI could begin accelerating its own
[00:17:19] development, AI building even better AI, that
[00:17:23] cycle would be very difficult to control. Some experts fear
[00:17:26] AI could soon carry out cyber attacks its
[00:17:30] own, and one whistleblower warned a future where
[00:17:33] self-improving AI threatens humanity is no longer just...
[00:17:37] science fiction, so it's not at all an exaggeration to say that the the people
[00:17:41] who are involved with both founding these companies and building the tech believe there
[00:17:45] is a possibility of human extinction. many AI researchers
[00:17:48] think extinction scenarios are still speculative, they
[00:17:52] argue we should focus on the risks we're already seeing
[00:17:55] today, disinformation, cyber crime, surveillance and
[00:17:58] job losses. the third reason US AI developers want to slow
[00:18:02] down is the most interesting one, they may want
[00:18:05] everyone to play by the... same rules: Open AI,
[00:18:09] Anthropic, XAI and Google are fierce rivals,
[00:18:13] fighting for customers, talent and investment. If just
[00:18:17] one company slows down, it could lose ground, and strict
[00:18:21] regulation could make it harder for startups and smaller
[00:18:24] competitors to catch up. That's why the developers are asking for
[00:18:28] rules that would apply to all major players. Beacon of
[00:18:31] major players, what about China? China has increasingly released open
[00:18:35] source AI models that developers. can adapt and build
[00:18:39] upon. At the same time, China isn't taking a
[00:18:42] handsof approach. What does this mean for users? In
[00:18:45] China, the safety of advanced AI isn't left solely to
[00:18:49] tech companies. Developers face regulatory requirements,
[00:18:53] security reviews and government oversight, and
[00:18:56] Reuters reports that authorities are now drafting a
[00:18:59] mandatory safety standard for AI agents. Chinese
[00:19:03] AI models like Deepseek and Alibaba's when are gaining more
[00:19:07] and more... users worldwide, millions of people already use
[00:19:10] AI in their shopping, search, video and chat
[00:19:13] apps. Chinese users see AI mainly as an
[00:19:16] opportunity rather than a threat. AI is already
[00:19:20] changing how we work, learn and spend our free time. It does
[00:19:24] create real risks from cyber attacks to the spread of
[00:19:27] misinformation. So this debate isn't just about some
[00:19:30] future super intelligent killer machine. It's about how much
[00:19:34] control we're willing to hand over to AI systems.
[00:19:37] AI safety was also high on the agenda at the United Nations
[00:19:41] General Assembly, a coalition of countries is now
[00:19:44] calling for mandatory safety testing to keep powerful AI
[00:19:48] under human control. What do you think, could AI ever
[00:19:51] become a threat to humanity and start making major decisions
[00:19:55] its own, or are those fears
[00:19:58] overblown?
[00:20:01] Is the internet dying because of AI? That's no
[00:20:04] longer a far-fetch conspiracy theory. major tech companies
[00:20:08] confirm there is risk. around
[00:20:11] 35% of newly published English websites
[00:20:14] are already AI generated
[00:20:18] recent study. what happens when most of the internet is written by
[00:20:22] machines and AI starts learning from itself. even if
[00:20:26] you don't read English content, the effects could reach every
[00:20:29] corner of the web. can the internet die? the
[00:20:33] dead internet theory makes a bold claim: bots and
[00:20:37] ai. generated text are flooding the web to the point it
[00:20:40] becomes useless. automated bots now generate
[00:20:44] more than 60% of all web requests according to internet
[00:20:48] infrastructure giant cloud flare.
[00:20:50] and the pages these bots are scraping are increasingly
[00:20:54] AI generated. nearly 10% of recent.com
[00:20:58] pages show clear signs of AI authorship
[00:21:01] according to pure research center. and here is where it gets
[00:21:04] interesting. techgiants know this could become a
[00:21:08] problem. recently unsealed court documents show that
[00:21:11] executives at Microsoft and Open AI are explicitly
[00:21:15] aware of a potential Doom loop triggered by their AI
[00:21:18] chatbots and search ends. Ironically, this Doom
[00:21:22] loop also endangers Big Tech current business model.
[00:21:25] At the moment, AI tools scrape human-made articles
[00:21:29] and extract summaries. Users get
[00:21:31] answers without clicking on the original source, and
[00:21:35] bigtech gets user data and add revenue. Critics say
[00:21:38] AI risks becoming a parasite on the web, feeding
[00:21:42] on human created content while weakening the websites and creators,
[00:21:46] it depends upon. If that continues, AI could end up damaging its
[00:21:49] own... food source, okay, but what does that mean
[00:21:53] for users? in the long run, this might make online
[00:21:56] information unusable. take the
[00:21:58] news, when you search for information online, there's a
[00:22:02] growing chance you're reading content created by
[00:22:05] AI. more and more publishers put out AI slop.
[00:22:08] they use AI to rewrite existing reports, but because
[00:22:12] AI is making mistakes, the results can include so-called
[00:22:15] hallucinations, errors and awkward phrasing. search
[00:22:19] algorithms. reward, speed and volume, so this low-cost
[00:22:23] AI content often outranks original
[00:22:25] reporting. It's pulling readers and add revenue away
[00:22:29] from real newsrooms. Eventually, AI models will
[00:22:32] end up retraining on these AI generated news
[00:22:35] articles, locking us into a feedback loop that permanently
[00:22:39] degrades the web. Because most AI models are trained
[00:22:43] primarily on English data, this gets even worse
[00:22:46] for other languages. When flawed English articles get auto
[00:22:50] translated into Urdu, Spanish or Hindi, it leaves
[00:22:53] even more room for hallucinated errors and dangerous
[00:22:57] inaccuracies. So, what can you do to stay
[00:23:00] well-informed? First, don't blindly trust convenient
[00:23:04] AI search summaries. If you use them, click through to
[00:23:08] primary sources, verify who wrote the
[00:23:11] piece, and then double check the information. Second,
[00:23:15] support human journalism. Consider
[00:23:17] subscribing to local paper or supporting journalists in your
[00:23:21] town before the real creators give up. what's your
[00:23:24] take on the dead internet theory? is the web dying
[00:23:28] or is it just changing? let us know in the
[00:23:30] comments.
[00:23:33] an $18 billion settlement, bad news for
[00:23:36] meta, big news for you. this could change social
[00:23:40] media as we know it. for years, meta and
[00:23:43] other social media companies have been accused of addictive
[00:23:46] design, building apps to keep users scrolling for as long.
[00:23:50] as possible, but several weeks ago Mata agreed to a
[00:23:53] landmark settlement and committed to new restrictions
[00:23:56] on teen accounts, at least in the US for now. some
[00:24:00] experts see it as major victory, others argue it
[00:24:04] doesn't go far enough, still if Mata is forced to
[00:24:07] change, the rest of the industry could follow. but
[00:24:10] let's rewind a bit: the $18 billion dollar settlement: three years
[00:24:14] ago, 29 states in the US suit meta, allegging
[00:24:17] that its social media platforms were half young users and
[00:24:21] research backs this up: the World Health Organization
[00:24:24] surveyed almost 280,000 young
[00:24:27] people across 44 countries and regions in Europe, central
[00:24:31] Asia and Canada.
[00:24:33] 11% showed signs of problematic social media
[00:24:37] use, basically addiction-like symptoms. Those
[00:24:40] same kids reported worse mental well-being, but it's
[00:24:44] important to mention that's a correlation, not proof
[00:24:47] the apps caused it. Then in August 2022. 26, just
[00:24:51] as the case was heading to trial, meta agreed to
[00:24:54] settlement worth up to $18 billion US dollars, plus
[00:24:57] meta has agreed to make significant changes that will
[00:25:00] reduce the risk of harm that instagram and
[00:25:03] facebook post to teen users. the settlement is being
[00:25:06] watched closely across the tech industry because it could
[00:25:10] influence how other platforms approach tean safety. this is what will
[00:25:13] change for tean users in the US, a 2-hour
[00:25:16] cumulative time limit across Instagram and Facebook.
[00:25:20] No access to the apps from midnight to 6 am
[00:25:23] unless there's parental permission, notifications muted by
[00:25:27] default during school hours, except DMs
[00:25:30] and security alerts, default settings to hide likes and beauty
[00:25:34] filters, plus the option to switch to a
[00:25:36] non-personalized feed (expanded parental
[00:25:39] controls). One thing to be clear about, Meta denied
[00:25:43] wrong-doing and liability, no court said Meta is
[00:25:46] guilty, Meta chose to stop the trial,
[00:25:50] interesting, Meta turned their own punishment into
[00:25:53] pressure on their rivals. Meta's full 18 billion
[00:25:57] US dollar payout depends in part on whether its biggest
[00:26:00] rivals end up facing similar legal consequences, the
[00:26:04] settlement uh marks a change of strategy
[00:26:08] for Meta, because they are
[00:26:10] embracing the idea that they need to do more,
[00:26:14] they are appearing as the industry
[00:26:17] leader, the author of reforms and they want other
[00:26:20] companies to follow their lead. So will this
[00:26:23] affect you outside of the US? Rules like these
[00:26:27] rarely stay in one country, building two different versions of
[00:26:30] Instagram is expensive. and regulators everywhere are
[00:26:34] watching closely, Meta's board is put on
[00:26:37] notice that this is a critical risk for the company that it needs
[00:26:41] to continue to oversee, and if it doesn't, consequences may
[00:26:45] flow. Still, critics are doubting anything will really
[00:26:49] change, some of these features already existed, they just weren't
[00:26:52] switched on by default, and the new rules depend on
[00:26:56] Meta, knowing you're under 18. The problem with age
[00:26:59] verification, data from Australia's new under
[00:27:02] social media band shows, age verification systems are
[00:27:06] difficult to enforce. Meta says it has a better way
[00:27:10] and it's been running since before the settlement. An AI
[00:27:13] scans your photos and videos for physical signs of
[00:27:16] age, your height or your facial bone structure. Then it
[00:27:20] cross-references your page. Did you post about your
[00:27:23] sweet 16? Are your friends all eighth grade? Meta
[00:27:27] insists this isn't facial recognition and that nobody is
[00:27:30] being identified. Privacy advocates
[00:27:33] are not convinced, so what do you think, huge step or
[00:27:37] are you skeptical this will bring meaningful change? Let us
[00:27:40] know, and that's all from me today, bye and see you next time.
[00:28:09] Violeta ultra intense softeners
[00:28:12] are a noticeably better choice. Why a three-seater when a
[00:28:16] six-seater is more comfortable? Everything you love, twice.
[00:28:20] TV from the region wherever you are. Save money, pay for three
[00:28:23] months, get three more free. Move
[00:28:26] Global, Arena Sports, FTV, OBN,
[00:28:29] Hayat, BN, and Video Club. Wherever
[00:28:33] you are, with basic, standard, and premium packages, no contract
[00:28:37] over the internet. Watch now, pay for three months,
[00:28:40] watch for six. Move Global, available worldwide.
[00:28:43] For those you love, take care of your
[00:28:47] heart, because your heart is not just yours. Aspirin Protect 100
[00:28:51] mg is recommended for people with high and very
[00:28:54] high risk of cardiovascular diseases, to
[00:28:57] reduce the risk of acute cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Before
[00:29:01] use, please read the instructions:
[00:29:05] or consult a pharmacist. Bayer.
[00:29:08] It's free. The Heart Center is now at
[00:29:11] ASA Hospital. Shopping is easy with the Amko
[00:29:15] lemon promotion. Mark
[00:29:18] 5.75 chicken, 2.85 cucumber,
[00:29:22] 95 fenning Fanta. Amko Komerc, your shopping
[00:29:25] friend.
[00:29:33] Accumulated earwax can be painful, can damage hearing, and
[00:29:37] cause infections. You continue to use cotton swabs to
[00:29:41] clean your ears, despite warnings from doctors and
[00:29:44] manufacturers of cotton swabs. Cotton
[00:29:46] swabs simply push earwax deeper into the ear, and can
[00:29:50] injure you. The cotton swab hasn't changed for almost a
[00:29:53] century. We reshaped it to finally
[00:29:56] make it safe and more effective. Introducing
[00:29:59] Ear Wizard, a new, ingenious device for... ear cleaning, which
[00:30:03] is the best way to safely and comfortably clean your ears. Just
[00:30:07] put it in your ear, twist, and gently remove the wax. It's that
[00:30:10] simple. Cotton ear swabs often push harmful wax and
[00:30:14] dirt deeper into the ear, which creates wax buildup and causes
[00:30:17] hearing loss, and can even puncture your eardrum. Ear Wizard is
[00:30:21] designed to move at a safe distance in your ear,
[00:30:24] then with just one motion it catches the wax and safely removes
[00:30:28] it without causing injury. The tissue in your inner ear is
[00:30:31] soft and sensitive. Cotton ear swabs are rigid and are not
[00:30:35] designed for the ear canal. Ear Wizard is much better. Its soft,
[00:30:39] hygienic silicone tip is designed to remove earwax and to
[00:30:43] enter the ear canal at a limited, safe
[00:30:46] distance. With the soft and flexible cleaning tip of Ear
[00:30:49] Wizard, you will gently and quickly remove wax from your ears without
[00:30:53] causing pain or injury. It is made of sanitary
[00:30:56] silicone that is washable and reusable. You will never have to again.