N1HRV — broadcast
20261102 233000 UTC
312 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] um, Senator Dan Sullivan told CNN today that he
[00:00:03] will accept the results in the Alaska US Senate raise the
[00:00:07] certification of which the Justice department has said it may
[00:00:10] challenge, but we're already hearing from Republican senator Tim Shihi of
[00:00:14] Montana that there was fraud perpetrated against the people of
[00:00:17] Alaska and under no circumstances should Mary
[00:00:21] Paltola be seated if she wins in a fraudulent
[00:00:25] manner. She argues, as you know, she has no knowledge of this democratic effort to
[00:00:28] stack the ballot. in Alaska um
[00:00:31] from and and to hurt the incumbent, though aid told the New York
[00:00:35] Times that the candidate did indeed no. bottom line, what do you
[00:00:39] expect the Senate to do if she wins, and does all
[00:00:43] this mess really hurt the democratic argument that they have moral
[00:00:47] high ground on election
[00:00:48] um, and we know they make a integrity? yeah, frankly, what the
[00:00:51] democrats did in Alaska seems to be to be pretty dumb, but
[00:00:55] it goes, this is, it's not illegal, it's what happens in
[00:00:59] every... right now in Ohio, there is
[00:01:02] gentleman who is running, as I understand that
[00:01:05] don't, claiming to be
[00:01:07] socialist, fine, and republican super pack is
[00:01:11] putting money into his election, so why in
[00:01:14] Ohio is the republican, a right-wing super pack
[00:01:18] funding socialist? the answer is obviously, obvious, they want
[00:01:22] to take votes away from shared brown, is this a good thing to
[00:01:25] do? no, it is not a good thing to do, it's a stupid thing to do investigation.
[00:01:30] is yeah of Alaska, that's the decision, the federal
[00:01:34] government does not get involved in state elections and you you
[00:01:38] have a president who in fact denied that he
[00:01:40] lost the election in 2020 against Biden for him
[00:01:44] to be deciding what is fair election and not is a little bit absurd,
[00:01:48] people of Alaska can make that decision themselves, so rather than
[00:01:52] focus a distraction about who said what to whom, where they went.
[00:01:56] I've been consistent, I want to get money out of
[00:01:59] politics. "I want to put money back in pockets, I
[00:02:03] want Medicare for all, I want to take on the heinous price of
[00:02:06] gas, the ridiculous price of groceries, the fact that people in the richest, most
[00:02:10] powerful country in the world cannot see doctor, the notion that we
[00:02:13] should continue to breathe unclean air or unclean water, that has been the focus of
[00:02:17] this campaign since April of 2025 when we kicked it off,
[00:02:21] other president, I don't believe, I'm sure, couldn't be, couldn't be
[00:02:24] possible, has done what I've done in the last two weeks, I mean what
[00:02:28] we've done, we have traveled." far and
[00:02:31] wide,
[00:02:36] now we've campaigned and I've enjoyed it, this is actually this is our
[00:02:40] last stop, we close it down tonight, but we've had a great
[00:02:43] time, the people, the love in this country is is
[00:02:46] unbelievable, but all I'm asking you to do is one thing, get out
[00:02:50] and vote, because if you do uh, we're going to have a
[00:02:54] tremendous
[00:02:59] trip. The Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs went to Doha to
[00:03:02] facilitate the
[00:03:05] interactions
[00:03:08] between the mediator and Iran, meaning
[00:03:11] he, with due to Qatar
[00:03:15] facilitating the exchange of messages
[00:03:19] between Iran and America, Mr.
[00:03:22] Gharibabadi was also present in Doha
[00:03:25] for this purpose.
[00:03:29] I can tell you
[00:03:30] that
[00:03:33] the talks are ongoing. After all, the issue is a complex one,
[00:03:36] or rather, the issues are very complex,
[00:03:39] and the passage of time,
[00:03:42] given America's actions, has
[00:03:45] added to the complexities.
[00:03:48] In our view, these message exchanges are still
[00:03:51] ongoing. We know
[00:03:54] that a new American election
[00:03:58] also on is not going to be born.
[00:04:02] America's confrontation with Iran, or rather
[00:04:05] America's malice against
[00:04:08] Iran, goes back more than 70 years, since
[00:04:12] the coup of August 1953. Therefore,
[00:04:15] we have seen these developments many times, we have seen the comings and goings.
[00:04:18] For this reason, we prefer
[00:04:22] to focus on ourselves
[00:04:25] and on strengthening our capabilities
[00:04:29] in all areas.
[00:05:23] What are your expectations for this afternoon? Yeah, absolutely. I think it is huge. It's it makes a
[00:05:27] big difference to the family to know that this has being taken seriously at that level, but
[00:05:31] what we need to see is a willingness, uh, from him to put
[00:05:35] his full political weight behind it. Now I'm not going to go in there and start demanding things
[00:05:39] because he has been championing my parents and he's done so publicly a couple of
[00:05:42] times. Um, but what I need to see is him to embody this, you know, take
[00:05:46] this on personally, um, and ultimately get the results that we're looking for, right, which
[00:05:50] are quite simple. It's arbitrary detention, uh, which leads on quite
[00:05:54] nicely to diplomatic protection. We've seen these been utilized
[00:05:58] and these tools been used before,
[00:06:01] difference. So it's a case of let's get some concrete answers. If it's not you're
[00:06:05] not going to call it ar extension, why not? We need those answers.
[00:06:09] Um, you're willing to call it unjustifiable and appalling,
[00:06:12] needed to go a step further because then it becomes a state to state
[00:06:16] problem and I think that's where it needs to be do. Last time we spoke, you weren't really
[00:06:19] talking to your mom and Craig very much, but you've had few phone calls over recent weeks. They know that
[00:06:23] you have this meeting with Ed Milliband today and they got a message that they want you to
[00:06:27] deliver on their behalf. Yeah, I say gratefully I managed to speak to my
[00:06:31] mom now three times in the roll on Monday.
[00:06:34] Um, it means the world to us. It means the world to me. It means the world to
[00:06:37] her. But they know I'm here. They knew I was here last week. Um, they
[00:06:41] understand to an extent what the campaign is trying to
[00:06:44] achieve and what we're trying to do. Obviously, they can't see the full thing.
[00:06:48] But their message, and it's the same as what we've been saying, is you know, we we need courage
[00:06:52] from Ed Milliband for him to call a spade a spade. Everybody knows that
[00:06:56] my parents are hostages. Um, so we need him to take action and they want it too. All right.
[00:07:00] Well, listen, Joe, good luck in there. We'll talk to you when you come out to to find
[00:07:04] out what happened in that meeting. But we'll let you meet your legal team and
[00:07:06] goes.
[00:07:18] Hello, hello. How'd it go?
[00:07:20] Um,
[00:07:22] uh, they always come out of those frustrated, right? I think the points
[00:07:26] that we try to make resonated with him. We're not going to get any decisive action
[00:07:30] today. Um,
[00:07:32] so frustration is the one word I'd use to sum it up
[00:07:36] because we everything that we do, they say is valid
[00:07:39] points. The everybody in the room knows it's arbitrary
[00:07:42] detention and that was said openly. That was your key
[00:07:46] ask, wasn't it, that your mom and Craig's
[00:07:48] detention was described as arbitrary by the foreign
[00:07:52] secretary, by the government.
[00:07:56] Was there a promise in that room that that would
[00:07:59] happen? Not a promise that it would happen, a promise that it's not
[00:08:02] off the table. At the core of this, my mom and Craig have asked
[00:08:06] for the government to recognize it for what it is.
[00:08:10] Um, the argument from the government that it puts them at risk. And again
[00:08:14] I come back and say, well, doing nothing or seemingly doing nothing and
[00:08:18] potentially leaving them in what could be another war zone is also risk.
[00:08:21] So you have to balance this, right? Um, and I think that's
[00:08:24] where again, I'll go back to the word frustrating,
[00:08:28] is because we want unity and we want solidarity with the government, and ultimately
[00:08:31] we want to work with them, but it still feels as though we're
[00:08:34] battling, um, and that's not
[00:08:37] useful at all. And and it makes it difficult for
[00:08:40] when I speak to my mom and Craig, it makes it difficult then to try and
[00:08:44] relay something positive to them. It's worth reminding people why you
[00:08:48] want the term arbitrary used. First and foremost because it's
[00:08:52] factual, right? Um, secondly, it elevates this, I believe,
[00:08:56] from a consular case and a welfare case in that we need to make sure
[00:09:00] they're okay, which is absolutely imperative. We do need to make sure you're
[00:09:03] okay, but arbitrary detention elevates this to a state to
[00:09:07] state level. It also, I would,
[00:09:10] I believe, it's my opinion that them doing so
[00:09:13] it would give a signal of intent to the Iranians
[00:09:17] that okay, the British are taking this seriously. And
[00:09:20] furthermore, I speak to people a day day-to-day basis, there are some
[00:09:24] people about the situation. There are people who have their
[00:09:26] opinions, um, and there are also people probably think they are spies,
[00:09:30] right? But I think if the government come out and defend them and say this is arbitrary
[00:09:34] detention, their hostages, that sort of eliminates that argument. And I think it gets a lot
[00:09:38] of people off the fence.
[00:09:41] Um, so all of these points in the meeting and the legal team are
[00:09:44] really really good at highlighting the legalities. But I go back
[00:09:48] it is this is a wish of my mom and Craig, and these are the people who are experiencing the
[00:09:52] worst thing that could happen to somebody, um, and being
[00:09:55] detained in Iran. So they have to take that seriously. And you've seen the difference it
[00:09:59] can make because I know that you're in touch with Nazanin Sakari Radcliffe and her
[00:10:03] husband Richard Radcliffe. And the term arbitrary was used
[00:10:07] by the the UK government in her case and you've heard firsthand from then the
[00:10:10] difference it made. I mean, obviously she was eventually
[00:10:14] released, but when she was held in the same prison as your mom and
[00:10:17] Craig, the fact that she was referred to by that
[00:10:21] term helped her. Yeah, and you know, I
[00:10:24] I I thank Richard and Nazanin and Anu for for for
[00:10:28] being so supportive and welcoming and and having conversations with us because it helps
[00:10:31] massively. Um, firstly, it shows that there is a happy ending.
[00:10:35] Um, but ultimately, the difference that it made to Nazanin, she
[00:10:39] said was an improvement when um Jeremy Hunt did the
[00:10:42] diplomatic protection for Nazanin, her
[00:10:45] circumstances improved drastically. Um,
[00:10:48] it took a lot of courage for Jeremy to do that at the time. Like it would take Ed
[00:10:52] a lot of courage to do the right thing here. But I think, as I
[00:10:56] say, the case was compelling enough, not that it needed any further explanation because it
[00:11:00] is a compelling case anyway. But I think we made the point very,
[00:11:03] very wholeheartedly, really. You know, ultimately, I'm I'm
[00:11:07] home. That's the bottom line. You've had a busy couple of weeks here in Westminster. You were
[00:11:11] here just last week for for PMQs where a question
[00:11:14] was asked of the prime minister about Lindsay and and Craig's case,
[00:11:18] and the prime minister responded to that question saying, "I agree that Lindsay and Craig's
[00:11:22] sentence is appalling and unjustifiable. We will
[00:11:25] continue to pursue the case relentlessly
[00:11:29] until they are safely returned home. The
[00:11:32] foreign office have also always said that health and
[00:11:36] welfare is top priority." When you hear words like that,
[00:11:40] top priority and working relentlessly, what does it mean
[00:11:43] in practice for your family? Are you seeing the benefits of those kind of
[00:11:47] words? Well, that's the one thing I think lacks is
[00:11:50] the action backing up what they're saying. I don't see it.
[00:11:54] Um, it's good to hear, you know, and I'll I'll break that
[00:11:57] what he said up into two parts. The first part, appalling and
[00:12:00] unjustifiable. Again, I was frustrated and annoyed to be honest with you that he
[00:12:04] used the exact same wording as Vet Cooper did in the former
[00:12:08] foreign secretary. But then I go back to the second half of the sentence where he says we're
[00:12:11] working relentlessly and tirelessly to get them home. And you have to take positives from
[00:12:15] that, right? So for him to say that in parliament with Richard and
[00:12:18] I in the gallery, it was a big moment, a massive moment, um, to
[00:12:22] hear the prime minister say those words. Gives you a sense of
[00:12:25] reassurance. What I always say needs to follow is
[00:12:29] the action to support those words. Um, am I saying
[00:12:32] it? No. Is it happening behind closed door? Hopefully, I don't know.
[00:12:36] Um, is there things that they can do? Yes.
[00:12:39] Final question. I know that you are getting to speak to to your mom a bit more
[00:12:43] now. Last time we spoke, it was very sporadic. You haven't spoken to her for some time, but I
[00:12:47] know that you've spoken to her the last few weeks and you're due another phone
[00:12:51] call on Monday. What will your update be to her after your meeting with Admiller?
[00:12:55] Again, I'll I'll digest this meeting properly and then try and think of a way
[00:12:59] that we can say
[00:13:02] something that gives them hope, because there are there are essences of hope without
[00:13:05] throughout all of this and positivity. Although the overall and I'm always
[00:13:09] honest with my mom, I will tell her that it was a frustrating meeting and she, we'll have a conversation
[00:13:13] about it. But I think what I will say is that what we said resonated because I could see
[00:13:17] it in his eyes. I could see the way that he
[00:13:20] responded with his body language when Warren and I,
[00:13:23] who's Craig's brother, were making these points. So I do generally believe he
[00:13:27] took it on board. Um, she already knows about Andy
[00:13:30] Burnham saying their names in parliament. And again, that gives them a
[00:13:34] boost of moral and a boost of confidence that something's happening.
[00:13:38] Um, so it'll be a bit of
[00:13:42] I don't not an uneventful update because there's not much
[00:13:46] to update her on other than they're taking it away, uh, which is annoying because
[00:13:49] I seem to say that to all the time, uh, but I will find something
[00:13:53] positive to give her a spin on it. is important,
[00:14:22] Dear viewers, hello, I am Aja. And you are watching
[00:14:26] today's review. Here's what we have
[00:14:27] for you.
[00:14:32] Pay secrecy is a thing of the past. Rules on annual leave are also changing.
[00:14:35] We bring you amendments to the Labor Law.
[00:14:38] radu.
[00:14:41] Croatia bids farewell to the legendary Mate Mišo Kovač. Today Šibenik,
[00:14:45] tomorrow Split, on Wednesday also Zagreb. The government has declared
[00:14:48] tomorrow a day of national
[00:14:49] mourning.
[00:14:55] The states go to the polls tomorrow in midterm elections that will decide
[00:14:58] the new composition of Congress. We are reporting live from
[00:15:01] Washington.
[00:15:05] European natural gas prices exceeded 100
[00:15:08] euros per megawatt-hour for the first time since December 2022. What consequences could
[00:15:12] such a rise have for the Croatian economy and citizens?
[00:15:16] Should we fear shortages? Find out later in
[00:15:19] the show.
[00:15:34] Split will bid farewell to the music legend Mišo
[00:15:38] Kovač, who passed away on Saturday at the age of 86.
[00:15:41] A commemoration is expected on Wednesday at the Lisinski Concert Hall in Zagreb,
[00:15:44] followed by a burial at Mirogoj. And today at
[00:15:47] 5 PM, the farewell began in Šibenik, where
[00:15:51] our cheerful Vesela Šegvić Kordić is located. Vesela, how is
[00:15:55] Šibenik bidding farewell to
[00:21:24] preparations are underway, tomorrow a big concert
[00:21:28] at Poljud is being prepared. At
[00:21:31] 4 PM, Poljud will be open to all visitors,
[00:21:35] for all visitors. Tickets have already been mostly
[00:21:38] snatched up, they are free. Everything
[00:21:41] starts at 5 PM and will last about an hour and
[00:21:45] 15 minutes, after which the coffin of Mate Mišo
[00:21:49] Kovač track at Split's
[00:21:52] Poljud. More about the organization of tomorrow's
[00:21:55] concert was spoken by Marinka Akrap from the Hajduk management, and Tomislav
[00:21:59] Mrduljaš from the Croatian Music Union.
[00:23:08] unfortunate event that we had, on the one hand,
[00:23:12] fate wanted us to receive the information during
[00:23:15] the match. You saw for yourselves how Poljud
[00:23:19] reacted then. We believed, together with us,
[00:23:23] as Hajduk, as a club, Torcida and the Croatian Music Union,
[00:23:26] that we then have an obligation to our dear Mišo, and to
[00:23:30] all his fans, who are also Hajduk fans,
[00:23:34] to do something, and for this reason, this musical
[00:23:37] farewell, this big send-off
[00:23:40] will happen right at Poljud. The plan is
[00:23:43] that tomorrow, Tuesday, at
[00:23:47] 4 PM, we will open the entrances, all entrances
[00:23:50] regarding Poljud, and to receive
[00:23:54] all those who will pick up their free tickets
[00:23:58] on time.
[00:24:22] echo through Poljud. He loved Hajduk the most in
[00:24:26] the world. Some say he almost loved him more than himself. Tomorrow
[00:24:29] is the concert at 5 PM at Split's Poljud. Split's Poljud
[00:24:33] opens its doors from 4 PM. It is assumed that the concert
[00:24:37] will last between 45 minutes and an hour
[00:24:40] and 15 minutes, after which Mišo should pass
[00:24:43] along the tartan track of Split's Poljud. We will
[00:24:47] follow everything live on the N1 television program.
[00:24:52] That's right, Vesela, we are following everything, both today and tomorrow. This was
[00:24:56] our Vesela Šegvić Kordić from Šibenik, and
[00:24:59] the government has declared tomorrow a day of national
[00:25:02] mourning due to the death of Mate Mišo Kovač, as a sign of respect
[00:25:06] for the musician who, as Vesela also said, marked the Croatian
[00:25:09] music scene for almost half a century. The symbol he is
[00:25:13] and the mark he leaves are witnessed by the citizens of Split with whom we spoke
[00:27:33] And tomorrow be with us from 4 PM because we are preparing
[00:27:37] a special show for you in which we will talk in the studio about the legacy of Mate
[00:27:41] Mišo Kovač, our reporters from the field will report on the farewell, and from
[00:27:45] 5 PM we will broadcast live the program from Poljud. And today
[00:27:48] we said goodbye to another musical giant at noon in
[00:27:52] the small hall of the Vatroslav Lisinski Concert Hall in Zagreb
[00:27:56] a commemoration was held for Goran Bare, the legendary frontman of
[00:28:00] Majke who passed away on October 9th at... 61
[00:28:03] years old, the farewell was organized by members of his
[00:28:06] band and the record label Croatia Records, Bare was
[00:28:09] buried in his native Vinkovci, after his
[00:28:12] death numerous fans gathered in Zagreb's
[00:28:16] Zaprešić where they paid tribute
[00:30:18] whoever does the same job should be paid equally for it,
[00:30:21] but how to verify that if you don't know by what criteria
[00:30:25] the employer even determines the salary? That's exactly what
[00:30:28] the new amendments to the Labor Law should change. Employers will
[00:30:32] have to clearly value job positions and explain how a particular
[00:30:36] salary is reached. Workers will get more
[00:30:39] information and the ability to compare earnings. Rules for
[00:30:43] using annual leave are also changing. The law was released for public
[00:30:46] consultation today. Details are brought to you by Viktorija
[00:30:48] Kristić. New rules for salaries and
[00:30:52] annual leave are coming. Employers will have to clearly define how much
[00:30:55] each job position is worth, workers will get the right to information.