N1SRP — broadcast
20261105 193000 UTC
531 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] discount on all Airvic products until November
[00:00:03] 16. Lily for everything I want.
[00:00:07] Domestos Power Foam now kills bacteria upside down.
[00:00:10] Thick foam clings to the surface and kills bacteria in hard-to-reach
[00:00:14] places. Domestos power foam
[00:00:17] unstoppable. We present you the new Domestos
[00:00:20] Bleach foam, cleans and whitens even hard-to-reach places.
[00:00:24] Unstoppable. Only in Maxbet. Max spin
[00:00:28] and a new tour. collect reward symbols,
[00:00:31] catch bells, win spin coins, enjoy reward
[00:00:35] maxbet, hey Lily, today I choose
[00:00:38] perfumes, discounted up to 40% until
[00:00:42] November 15.
[00:00:44] that there are problems regarding Tracton achieves a triple effect as an antibiotic, antiseptic,
[00:00:47] anesthetic, something concrete for the throat, before use, carefully read the instructions on indications,
[00:00:51] measures, precautions, side effects of the drug, consult a doctor or
[00:00:53] pharmacist.
[00:01:03] You are watching N1 live and immediately the news that just
[00:01:06] arrived.
[00:01:09] The Republic Election Commission announced the final results of the early
[00:01:13] parliamentary elections held on October 25,
[00:01:16] the National Assembly includes the student list, students win, which
[00:01:20] won 2,354,
[00:01:24] those data to, who used those 47,000 votes, or 140
[00:01:26] mandates. The list United Serbia Aleksandar Vučić for... who
[00:01:30] voted 1.7.300 uh
[00:01:34] 301,
[00:01:36] 1,731,323
[00:01:39] voters who won 103 mandates, the minority list,
[00:01:42] another one that entered the parliament, Rasim Ljajić, got one
[00:01:46] mandate, the Alliance of Vojvodina Hungarians two, Usame
[00:01:49] Zukolić, the movement for unification, SDA guardians
[00:01:52] of Sandžak one mandate each and the Albanian coalition two
[00:01:56] mandates. We continue, so we have final, final
[00:01:59] results. elections and an opportunity to slowly constitute,
[00:02:03] to verify mandates and constitute the parliament
[00:02:06] where I stopped you, so we talked about the legal
[00:02:10] allowance and that obligation, why now, yes, that
[00:02:13] is a instruction that really caused
[00:02:16] great interest primarily among us prosecutors, members of the public prosecution
[00:02:20] organization, uh, at the head of that commission, as we
[00:02:24] know, Mr. Goran Ilić, a prosecutor of undisputed authority and
[00:02:28] reputation, and in his statements and addresses, he explained
[00:02:31] the tasks of that commission, namely, in a large number of cases, or
[00:02:35] a certain number of cases, there is great
[00:02:38] public interest, there are public assessments that
[00:02:41] something was not handled, that in those cases, it was not handled in the most correct,
[00:02:45] best way, uh, and Mr. Ilić explained that the
[00:02:49] task of that commission is to review those
[00:02:52] cases, that simply
[00:02:55] from prosecutors who enjoy the greatest
[00:02:59] authority and reputation, given their position, to give a final
[00:03:02] opinion, whether everything was done as it should, whether there is a
[00:03:05] need for additional measures to be taken in those cases,
[00:03:08] as well as whether there is a need for disciplinary measures to be taken against prosecutors,
[00:03:12] I would just add that this will
[00:03:15] contribute not only in that direction, but in the other,
[00:03:19] where perhaps the public unjustifiably criticized
[00:03:22] the handling of some cases, that this will contribute to perhaps giving
[00:03:26] a final judgment that in those cases everything was correct. that there is no
[00:03:30] reason for any disciplinary action, Mr. Zarić, so,
[00:03:34] let's talk now about the arrests of high-ranking
[00:03:36] police officers, Marko Kričak, so that the public knows
[00:03:40] that I won't list them all, how does that
[00:03:43] look to you, did those arrests surprise you
[00:03:47] or did you expect on this wave that
[00:03:51] well, they would end up in custody, I mean, I expected
[00:03:54] that it was a completely normal and realistic reaction of a
[00:03:57] state, believing that one day it would come to that. that everyone
[00:04:01] is responsible for what they do and for any
[00:04:04] abuses, here there were abuses, now we had
[00:04:08] a series of events, from arrests at Alta bank
[00:04:12] from, well, the director of
[00:04:16] RHMZ was also arrested, today we have in Pfondu in Novi
[00:04:19] Sad, how now everything is happening quickly, quickly,
[00:04:23] but this arrest is a bit late considering what
[00:04:27] was happening and being done and I believe
[00:04:31] that there is enough evidence,
[00:04:35] enough evidence exists that these police officers must be held
[00:04:38] accountable, not only them, but all those who, who then
[00:04:42] knows, so, if Kričak did
[00:04:45] something as the head of the criminal police or
[00:04:48] the commander of SAJ, so who is that in that
[00:04:52] hierarchy who had to know what they were doing who
[00:04:55] should also give a statement regarding that, and possibly
[00:04:59] be held accountable, well, yes. the director of the police, who is there, who really
[00:05:02] should have taken action, well, this, some measures, there wasn't even
[00:05:06] the initiation of the simplest disciplinary procedure, and there
[00:05:09] were certainly violations of official duty from... serious
[00:05:12] violations, perhaps even for dismissal, there isn't even
[00:05:15] that, we saw Valjevo, we saw Belgrade in front of the Faculty of Law, we saw
[00:05:19] that girl, when I keep repeating that, that girl
[00:05:23] as I understand, I think I understood correctly that the prosecution first
[00:05:27] found that uh postpone that
[00:05:30] institute of postponing criminal, you mean Nikolina Sinđelić, you mean her or this
[00:05:34] girl whose hair was pulled, the girl and so on,
[00:05:37] if that's not abuse, this torture and if that
[00:05:40] policewoman who continued to work.
[00:05:42] really continues to work completely normally as if nothing happened, that no one
[00:05:46] takes any action against such a person, there are many
[00:05:49] more, so then something, and could
[00:05:52] the director of the police decide independently, Mr. Majić, I ask you, so you know
[00:05:56] the hierarchical structure of the
[00:05:59] police, probably you do, but is it possible that
[00:06:03] the director of the police has so much power, so much strength, and ultimately
[00:06:06] some political power to say we won't these, regardless
[00:06:09] of such obvious evidence, we won't even examine
[00:06:13] them disciplinarily, or did someone above have to say,
[00:06:17] don't touch this, well, as I said before, people were appointed to those
[00:06:20] positions who are loyalists, who were simply
[00:06:24] there to stop such things, uh, in
[00:06:27] such systems as we had, you must keep that in mind, people
[00:06:31] often have far, certain loyalists have far greater power
[00:06:35] than their hierarchical position entails, that is, for example, the case with
[00:06:38] this senior prosecutor in Belgrade, he at one
[00:06:42] point conditioned to be the absolute sole
[00:06:45] prosecutor practically in Serbia, he through his jurisdiction, by taking over some
[00:06:49] cases where the jurisdiction of the higher public prosecutor's
[00:06:52] office in Belgrade is very questionable, he expanded
[00:06:56] his loyalist power, he presented
[00:07:00] it to those authorities for that reason, I would just say in one sentence
[00:07:04] that we have already agreed to disagree on everything, and that is perfectly fine, you know, that one
[00:07:07] platitude constantly creeps in, in my opinion,
[00:07:10] a platitude always has honorable
[00:07:12] individuals, that is indisputable, honorable
[00:07:16] individuals exist everywhere, always in every service,
[00:07:20] it's nice to say that we encourage them, but it depends on when and how
[00:07:23] you say it, it can be nice to say,
[00:07:26] it can be a dangerous relativization, because if you
[00:07:29] have a dramatic problem in one service that
[00:07:33] does dramatically ugly things, as we are now seeing a little,
[00:07:36] as I fear will be shown even more what the security
[00:07:40] intelligence agency actually did, for example, well,
[00:07:43] if you want the public prosecutor's organization, then on the one
[00:07:47] hand it's nice to say that some deputy public prosecutor, I don't
[00:07:50] know, in Leskovac is a good person and did his job
[00:07:54] honestly, but that can cast a wrong light on
[00:07:58] the primary characteristic of that organization which, unfortunately,
[00:08:01] in the previous period, based on the leading people of that
[00:08:05] organization and the actions they took, left a primarily
[00:08:09] very, very, to say the least, bad impression. We also have
[00:08:12] prosecutors who publicly spoke out, you just, I wanted to
[00:08:16] say that, you know, because I would always ask the question, you know,
[00:08:19] one of my questions that I often asked was
[00:08:23] to that organization, whatever it
[00:08:26] was, how many people were there who in all these years of what we lived through,
[00:08:29] truly said: "People, this is absolutely unacceptable, this is
[00:08:33] a crime that the state is committing against its population, I didn't see
[00:08:37] columns of people from the security information agency, not from
[00:08:40] the prosecutor's office, but there were a few and..." enas who
[00:08:43] went through the most terrible
[00:08:46] bullying in the organizations in which they worked, who were removed from
[00:08:50] cases, mistreated, about whom it is said, well, I also didn't see
[00:08:54] any protection for those many
[00:08:57] colleagues who do their job phenomenally and I often said, one of
[00:09:01] the tests for me would be, you know, did you hear in the
[00:09:04] prosecutor's office about Bojana Savović, did you hear?
[00:09:07] Well, what did you specifically do when you saw
[00:09:10] the mistreatment of your colleague?
[00:09:13] As a public prosecutor official who should protect
[00:09:16] the law, you watched for years the mistreatment of your
[00:09:20] colleague, you were aware that they were mistreating her just
[00:09:23] because she doesn't agree, she's not a loyalist there, and what did
[00:09:27] you specifically do for her, did you mention it at some meeting, did
[00:09:30] you make some note, or in the High Prosecutorial Council, did you say this is
[00:09:34] unacceptable, let's deal with this? You didn't, so I have to ask how
[00:09:38] can I believe you that you did your basic job impartially and
[00:09:42] lawfully. "When they mistreat one person in your house, and you are
[00:09:45] ready to be silent, sir, I apologize, I'm finishing, so that
[00:09:49] we can be honest about
[00:09:52] what happened and what will happen,
[00:09:55] I think it's dangerous, of course, always with that sentence, there are
[00:09:59] honest people and there were honest people, that it is a dangerous
[00:10:02] relativization to now say, well, yes, these are some
[00:10:06] individuals who did something, our bad people
[00:10:09] among us did a little, we lived for 14 years." we lived
[00:10:13] an occupation of the system, Mr. Vujičić, would you like to
[00:10:16] comment, serious serious this, serious comments,
[00:10:20] you know what, I come from the public prosecutor's organization, in conversation with my
[00:10:24] colleagues. "At the basic level, at the higher
[00:10:27] level with acquaintances and friends, not only from Valjevo, but also wider,
[00:10:31] uh, we all agreed that there are some problems
[00:10:34] that are characteristic of our public prosecutor's
[00:10:37] organization, whether it is, I would
[00:10:40] say, that cabinet-style way of leading the public prosecutor's
[00:10:44] organization by the leaders of the public prosecutor's organization, I remember
[00:10:48] times when the leaders of the prosecutor's organization,
[00:10:51] republican prosecutors, knew all of us who were, let's say, at that basic
[00:10:55] or higher level, now that has changed a bit, simply
[00:10:59] things are done more through instructions or
[00:11:02] through some controls, less through that personal
[00:11:06] relationship. Also, I agree
[00:11:09] the personnel policy that was conducted by the High
[00:11:13] Prosecutorial Council in the previous, in the
[00:11:15] previous uh composition, and
[00:11:18] now, simply we are all
[00:11:21] aware that certain positions in the public prosecutor's organization were taken by colleagues
[00:11:25] who perhaps shouldn't have, shouldn't have taken them, we are all
[00:11:28] aware that simply some who should have progressed,
[00:11:32] taken better positions, better places, whether they are
[00:11:34] uh prosecutors in higher in
[00:11:37] appellate courts, that they were not given passage at some point
[00:11:41] precisely, and why? Because they were not politically
[00:11:44] suitable, there were certainly, there were certainly more
[00:11:47] reasons, simply uh the functioning of
[00:11:51] the High Prosecutorial Council was at one point very monolithic, I think that
[00:11:55] there was a unified position of all
[00:11:59] those, let's say, centers of power, that at that
[00:12:01] time, uh, certain staffing was
[00:12:04] done with which of course some of us
[00:12:08] thought it was not good, but I also allow that those who
[00:12:11] decided knew better than us what and how they were doing
[00:12:15] uh I am convinced that there were those
[00:12:18] outside the prosecutorial centers of power who had a certain
[00:12:22] influence on all of that, who uh well... certainly centers
[00:12:25] of power that are not in, who are close to
[00:12:29] the executive, who are close to the executive power, have you
[00:12:32] heard of any such specific, no, I don't expect
[00:12:35] you to tell me names, but in your local
[00:12:39] environment, do you know that some do you know when we comment on some
[00:12:42] election we come to some
[00:12:45] name we say that we come to some name for which we
[00:12:49] believe that it has taken a position that it should not have
[00:12:52] taken.
[00:12:55] Nesov, that is SPS, it doesn't matter what we say, I think we are now moving a little away from
[00:12:58] a topic that is perhaps much more important at this moment, that
[00:13:01] is, if we are going to deal with the public prosecutor's
[00:13:05] organization in this way, then uh
[00:13:08] this reputation and this momentum that we recognize at this
[00:13:11] moment, prosecutor Bojana Savović, who was a guest a few
[00:13:15] days ago on your television, said that she was pleasantly surprised by what is
[00:13:19] happening and the activities that public prosecutors are undertaking at this
[00:13:22] moment, uh we see that a
[00:13:25] consciousness has awakened among public prosecutors, we see that
[00:13:28] cases, as you say, are being handled faster, that simply
[00:13:31] there is that communication between
[00:13:34] prosecutor and police, police, but it's okay for the public to ask why
[00:13:38] earlier,
[00:13:40] uh, isn't it okay to ask such a question, of course, but
[00:13:44] there are also examples that it was handled properly in the previous
[00:13:47] period, there are also examples of prosecutors who, well, Mr.
[00:13:51] Majić just said, prosecutors who had certain problems because they acted
[00:13:55] in the way they should have acted, we all
[00:13:58] agree on that, but I believe that now we have a
[00:14:02] moment that is perhaps historically important, very important, allow me
[00:14:05] just to finish that, which is that prosecutors become aware
[00:14:09] of the constitutional and legal mechanisms,
[00:14:12] instruments they possess, which they have at their disposal, and that
[00:14:15] the public becomes aware that prosecutors are
[00:14:18] the bearers of the fight against crime, that, which is perhaps
[00:14:22] most important, all those who have
[00:14:25] been, who will be the bearers of executive power,
[00:14:29] understand that prosecutors are definitely becoming
[00:14:32] independent, I hope that judges remain
[00:14:36] independent that it will force them to
[00:14:39] pay attention to their actions, that everyone will come, that
[00:14:43] accountability will be transferred to the next topic, today we have
[00:14:46] a statement, a joint
[00:14:50] assessment, Zagorka Dolovac met with the Prosecutor General
[00:14:53] of the Netherlands, and they assessed, I quote, "recent events in
[00:14:57] Serbia have removed, have removed political and institutional obstruction to
[00:15:01] the work of public prosecutor's offices in the country."
[00:15:04] Why didn't we hear the General earlier? Well, Mr. Zarić, we can,
[00:15:07] then we will make a new round, why didn't we hear
[00:15:11] uh Prosecutor Dolovac say
[00:15:14] something like that earlier, that there are political obstacles for us
[00:15:17] prosecutors and me as the supreme public prosecutor to do my
[00:15:20] job, well, simply we are witnesses, it is a fact that the
[00:15:24] prosecutor's office was quite dormant,
[00:15:27] Prosecutor, Supreme Prosecutor Dolovac
[00:15:30] rarely appeared, rarely acted like this, it
[00:15:34] cannot be said, well, at least she is acting now, but this...
[00:15:37] "it wasn't like that in the previous period, furthermore, we have a situation where sometimes
[00:15:41] the prosecutor, he cannot do it alone, if the police are obstructing,
[00:15:44] we have had many examples so far, that
[00:15:48] the police, instead of fulfilling their role and obligation, ultimately,
[00:15:51] because the prosecutor is the head of the pre- investigation procedure and to act
[00:15:55] according to the obligatory request or to act according to
[00:15:58] the order, or, it very often happened that the police did not
[00:16:02] do it, or we had these situations where
[00:16:06] police officers who participated in working groups, in the phases of investigation
[00:16:09] before the special prosecutor's office, they were mysteriously withdrawn and the groups were
[00:16:13] abolished. Therefore, the work of prosecutors was hampered and regardless of
[00:16:17] that, I agree with Mr.
[00:16:20] Majić, so, so, you cannot not have that much
[00:16:24] courage, integrity,
[00:16:27] so that we turn our heads away from something that is really happening and that
[00:16:31] is really incredibly unbelievable, we must be collegial,
[00:16:34] we must, well, here you had television,
[00:16:37] AS, look at how people 100% said
[00:16:41] no, what institution did that, and when
[00:16:44] we talk about accountability, we are not talking about collective accountability, we are talking about individual
[00:16:47] accountability, but the institution must be held accountable in the sense of who
[00:16:51] did this, who initiated, who asked, who carried out
[00:16:55] the target, who ordered, who signed, who took it to the judge,
[00:16:58] who contacted the judge, who you gave
[00:17:02] data, in that sense, we must talk about the accountability of the institution, in
[00:17:05] that sense of the prosecutor's office, why there? Why didn't it work, and it didn't, it worked
[00:17:09] as much as it could, some will say, well, we couldn't, well,
[00:17:13] why couldn't you, you weren't allowed, or, well, say you weren't allowed, by whom
[00:17:16] weren't you allowed, or, but now everything has started, now everything
[00:17:20] is functioning, yes, uh, the next topic I would like to, Mr.
[00:17:23] Majić, pardons, so, first we learned that
[00:17:27] Novi Sad activists were pardoned, then
[00:17:30] later name by name was practically
[00:17:33] revealed, it was like a big secret, who the president
[00:17:37] pardoned on the last day of his mandate,
[00:17:39] this, did the list surprise you when you
[00:17:43] saw Dijana Hrkalović, when you saw Gorski Matović,
[00:17:46] when you saw the people who drew on the
[00:17:49] students, were you surprised,
[00:17:53] honestly, if I had seen any name on that list, I personally
[00:17:57] would not have been surprised, and I will immediately say why, I often tell
[00:17:59] students when I teach
[00:18:03] and at work that the criminal offense of
[00:18:06] abuse of official position very rarely
[00:18:09] actually happens in practice, there are many wrongful
[00:18:12] accusations, misunderstandings of that criminal offense, but
[00:18:16] this will probably be one of the typical examples of the criminal offense of
[00:18:20] abuse of official position, where a certain person, in
[00:18:23] this specific case the President of the Republic, has the authority to
[00:18:26] pardon, to make a decision for practically
[00:18:30] any person who is under investigation or, but he does not do
[00:18:33] it in the interest of
[00:18:37] that for which he was given that authority, but does it
[00:18:40] in his personal interest or in the interest of his
[00:18:44] comrades, cronies, business or whatever
[00:18:47] friends you want, it is very possible that this will
[00:18:50] turn out to be one of the typical cases. The second thing I would like, why
[00:18:54] I said I would not be surprised at all, I personally
[00:18:57] am not sure, and I would like someone to disabuse
[00:19:00] me of the notion that we can even know a) when that act was
[00:19:04] passed, uh, whether there was one
[00:19:07] version or more versions of that act, or whether it was drafted at
[00:19:11] the last moment when it was presented to us,
[00:19:15] because uh neither one of those options, absolutely, who guarantees
[00:19:19] us that that act was passed when it was said that these names
[00:19:22] were in that decision when it was
[00:19:25] told to us, why do I say this, here
[00:19:28] nothing of the procedure, but literally nothing was
[00:19:31] respected, if you remember, we immediately
[00:19:34] had a statement from this minister
[00:19:37] of justice who said we have nothing to do with this,
[00:19:40] mind you, that is a mandatory element in pardons,
[00:19:44] the Ministry of Justice is the one that proposes, right, the president, they
[00:19:47] immediately said, we have nothing to do with this, that act was not
[00:19:51] delivered to anyone until a few days ago, that is, when it
[00:19:54] happened, who can, even though the public demanded it all the time,
[00:19:58] of course, the President of the Republic himself mentioned a few names,
[00:20:01] and deprived us of the rest, and that will still be
[00:20:05] raised, I really ask. I ask, how can we
[00:20:09] know when these names were
[00:20:12] designated by him, right, that it wasn't done
[00:20:15] the day before yesterday
[00:20:18] from some different variants
[00:20:21] of names, but whatever it was from all that, it
[00:20:24] only speaks of an unprecedented
[00:20:27] illegality in the proceedings,
[00:20:31] now there will be, of course, questions are being asked more and more often
[00:20:34] how to prevent this, how to stop in the
[00:20:37] system such an obvious, multi-obvious
[00:20:41] illegality, uh, I am currently inclined, although I am not
[00:20:44] an administrative lawyer, to somehow more for me, because this doesn't exist anywhere,
[00:20:48] you don't have practice for this, no one has, I don't even know
[00:20:52] other countries, we had a case in
[00:20:55] Macedonia, this, but, but it's not a common
[00:20:58] thing for presidents of the Republic to abuse that
[00:21:02] authority by this, it would only be
[00:21:05] this funnier if the President of the Republic
[00:21:09] had already acquitted himself of the possibility of being subject to any
[00:21:12] criminal proceedings, this must be
[00:21:16] removed from the system somehow and for now.
[00:21:20] I think and I conclude, uh, uh, it really seems to me that the call
[00:21:23] for the courts to stop, at least stop,
[00:21:26] the proceedings on this, for a procedure to be initiated
[00:21:29] before the administrative court, so just to mention the Milivojević
[00:21:32] family, the only accused from Lučani, the only
[00:21:36] accused for the death of their son was
[00:21:39] pardoned, uh, we remember that he came to the presidency
[00:21:43] almost asking for the possibility to at least place a monument
[00:21:47] to his son, this, not to mention the agony they went
[00:21:50] through for years, today we have
[00:21:53] a prosecutor who requested
[00:21:56] that the detention of
[00:21:59] Marko Pavlović be abolished in the Sonja Ponjavić case,
[00:22:03] I might ask you at the end not to list anyone
[00:22:06] else who was pardoned, so is the solution
[00:22:10] to go individually from case
[00:22:12] to case, or what Mr. Majić says, to go
[00:22:16] to, uh, to that the entire act of
[00:22:20] pardoning 49 pardoned people is an
[00:22:24] abuse of position, what is what
[00:22:26] is let's agree
[00:22:29] there is a clearly prescribed procedure regulated by
[00:22:33] the law on pardons, what are the steps to issue a pardon, that
[00:22:37] a request from an authorized person or a person against whom proceedings are being conducted,
[00:22:41] the opinion of the court, the court gathers information about that
[00:22:44] person, evidence, we are talking about situations where the
[00:22:48] trial is ongoing, not when a verdict has been reached. Those information go to the Ministry of
[00:22:52] Justice, the Ministry of Justice prepares a report with a proposal that is
[00:22:55] sent to the President of the Republic, the President of the Republic is not bound by the opinion
[00:22:59] of the Ministry of Justice, if any of these
[00:23:02] steps, if any of these steps was not
[00:23:05] followed, who reacts then, that is the real question, what we know
[00:23:09] is that the Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime for the fight against organized
[00:23:12] crime has already initiated proceedings, i.e. requested the collection of information in this
[00:23:16] regard, and we will see if all these
[00:23:19] steps were followed or not, if all steps
[00:23:22] were followed, it means that the pardon is valid,
[00:23:26] regardless of how moral, how
[00:23:29] valuable and so on, if any of these steps was not
[00:23:33] followed, then these questions that Mr. Majić
[00:23:36] spoke about arise, how to react at that moment, the minister already said no,
[00:23:40] okay, okay, but now if the courts, well, that's the real question, maybe for you,
[00:23:43] if the courts have before them an act
[00:23:47] of pardon for specific persons and they have...
[00:23:50] the knowledge that there is a possibility that this act of
[00:23:53] pardon is not legally valid, what should they do in
[00:23:57] specific cases, do they have a legal possibility to stop and
[00:24:01] wait to see who it will be, whether it will be the administrative court, the constitutional
[00:24:04] court, whether the prosecutor's decision in the specific
[00:24:08] case will be awaited in order to make a final
[00:24:11] decision in that procedure, so these are some controversial legal issues and what
[00:24:15] I also agree with is that there is no unified position of theorists at this
[00:24:19] moment, because these are rare situations, what and
[00:24:23] how to react, we are finishing very briefly, one
[00:24:26] question for all of you, briefly, so uh, what would be your
[00:24:30] indicator in one sentence that Serbia truly wants
[00:24:33] independent institutions, free from political influence, what
[00:24:37] should happen, one sentence for everyone, all
[00:24:39] three of you,
[00:24:43] well, what should happen, here for example, the professionalization
[00:24:47] of the police, uh, the jurisdiction of the prosecutor's office,
[00:24:50] the independence of the prosecutor's office, so, real, independence
[00:24:54] of the judiciary, financial investigations to the end,
[00:24:58] that's it, that's it, Mr. Majić, Serbia undoubtedly wants
[00:25:02] an independent judiciary and police, I have no dilemmas about that,
[00:25:06] but that would be the first step for me
[00:25:09] uh, a clear acclamation of the new authorities,
[00:25:13] which we have never had here, that from tomorrow, if
[00:25:16] you hear, I don't know, let the Minister of Justice or the Prime Minister say
[00:25:20] that from me, I will call a judge on the phone or
[00:25:23] a prosecutor, say it publicly on television and dismiss me
[00:25:27] immediately, that it will be the biggest sin of this government and
[00:25:31] it should be given, we received this last information that the
[00:25:34] results of the elections have been
[00:25:38] procedures should soon begin that will lead
[00:25:41] to a new parliament, a new new
[00:25:44] prime minister, a new new session in Nemanjina, thank you
[00:25:48] very much for being guests of N1, uh, you watched
[00:25:51] N1 live, stay with our channel,
[00:25:55] follow us on digital platforms as well. Good
[00:25:58] night.
[00:26:07] Trahisane has a triple effect as an antibiotic, antiseptic,
[00:26:10] anesthetic, something specific for the throat, before use, carefully read the instructions on indications,
[00:26:14] precautions, adverse reactions to the drug, consult a doctor or
[00:26:16] pharmacist,
[00:26:20] nice smell everywhere,
[00:26:23] from here to here, even
[00:26:26] here, new Dove deodorant for
[00:26:30] the whole body. Gum inflammation, if not
[00:26:34] treated, can lead to periodontosis, in the worst case
[00:26:38] even to tooth loss, so early prevention is very important,
[00:26:41] Lacalut active noticeably tightens gums from the first
[00:26:44] use, special formula strengthens gums and protects against gum
[00:26:48] inflammation, Lacalut active helps you
[00:26:52] Bambi team for a good discount, super offer 600g
[00:26:55] plasma 449 in
[00:26:58] Univerexport, going to the mountains, good, enjoying
[00:27:01] the enchanting, captivating view, excellent, feeling like
[00:27:05] a queen, very
[00:27:08] bueno, Kinder Bueno, delicious and crunchy wafer
[00:27:11] product covered with chocolate with a delicate and creamy hazelnut
[00:27:14] filling, good, excellent,
[00:27:17] bueno, not every danger is visible, not every signal
[00:27:21] is loud, and sometimes when we notice it, we have already ignored it for too long, five
[00:27:24] natural ingredients, reishi, royal jelly, polyphenols from
[00:27:28] grapes, lycopene, sulforaphane, g132
[00:27:31] plus natural, German product 20 years on the market.
[00:27:34] Sudden leaks should not disrupt your day, your nights should
[00:27:38] be carefree. Libresse provides you with up to 100% leak protection
[00:27:42] thanks to its fast-absorbing core and absorption channels.
[00:27:45] Libresse, protection that understands sudden
[00:27:48] leaks. We tested our devices for
[00:27:51] different life situations.
[00:27:54] Reliable. Beko. New Dave Mendez deodorant for
[00:27:57] the whole body. Protects you here, there. Even
[00:28:01] down here. Care that goes everywhere, really
[00:28:04] everywhere. Does pain often disrupt your plans?
[00:28:07] Ibutop creme can help you. It relieves back pain, muscle
[00:28:11] pain from sprains and strains and sports injuries. Ibutop Cream is your ally
[00:28:15] in pain relief, before use, carefully read the instructions, indications, precautions, adverse
[00:28:19] reactions to the drug, consult a doctor or pharmacist. In Benu
[00:28:22] pharmacies, great offers and great savings. Alpine
[00:28:26] cream at a super price of 999 RSD. As
[00:28:29] well as 30% savings on Bioderma products.
[00:28:32] Collect points with every purchase.
[00:28:35] Benu.
[00:28:36] Raffaello.
[00:28:39] And summer is always
[00:28:40] there.
[00:28:46] Experience a unique combination of almond
[00:28:49] , cream and light coconut flakes.
[00:28:53] Raffaello, a true summer experience, do
[00:28:56] something good for yourself. Open an Erste standard or premium account
[00:29:00] with no maintenance fees for a year, pay with a Visa debit
[00:29:04] card and we will return up to 9,000 dinars, special
[00:29:08] savings conditions await you. Erste bank cashback,
[00:29:11] domestic from the first hand. Domestic
[00:29:14] pork, kilogram
[00:29:15] 599.999.
[00:29:19] Domestic fresh bacon kilogram
[00:29:21] 599.999.
[00:29:24] So fresh, so Maxi. New Cocolino liquid
[00:29:27] detergent. Our first detergent created for quick washing. Removes invisible
[00:29:31] dirt and sweat even in 15 minutes, effective against unpleasant
[00:29:34] odors, incredible freshness that lasts, new Cocolino liquid
[00:29:38] detergent, effective even in 15 minutes.
[00:29:52] Tiramoret, enjoy life's little
[00:29:55] pleasures. Trahisane has a triple effect as
[00:29:58] an antibiotic, antiseptic, anesthetic, something specific for
[00:30:01] the throat. Carefully read the instructions on indications, precautions, adverse reactions to the drug, consult a doctor or pharmacist.
[00:30:28] Weekly Radar announced that the editor-in-chief, Vesna.
[00:30:32] Ališić, and journalists Sandra Petrošić and Milan Radonjić were under
[00:30:36] secret surveillance and wiretapping measures by the
[00:30:38] Security Information Agency. I am discussing this with Milan
[00:30:42] Radonjić, our colleague, journalist from Radar, good day, thank you for being
[00:30:45] here, well, I don't know where to start, should I start from Radar or from
[00:30:49] these latest findings that we
[00:30:52] have now, uh, Ana conveyed to us, that it was not
[00:30:56] only Radar that was targeted but also.