NDTV — broadcast
20261011 160000 UTC
332 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] and in Yemen, and what is the other group? You are seeing
[00:00:04] this map, Saudi Arabia is visible above, this is Yemen
[00:00:07] and this is Sana'a, if you look at the map
[00:00:10] of Yemen, the yellow part of Yemen and the green part you are seeing
[00:00:14] on the other side, this yellow and green part is all of Yemen, but on one side
[00:00:18] there is a government in Yemen, which is the yellow part you are
[00:00:20] ones, we'll be back after a break. seeing, the green part is occupied by Houthi rebels, these
[00:00:23] are the rebels who have occupied this area, they also fight
[00:00:27] with the government of Yemen, they also fight with the army there and they
[00:00:30] are also fighting with Saudi Arabia, now look, the border meets, so it is easy for them to drop
[00:00:34] missiles in Saudi, fire drones, below you are seeing Bab-el-Mandeb
[00:00:38] Strait, here, when a ship passes through here, they also occupy
[00:00:42] it, they attack it, it comes from the Red Sea, for Saudi, here
[00:00:45] also they have made life difficult, so let me tell you now, how did
[00:00:49] the enmity between Saudi and Houthi actually happen, what
[00:00:53] is the reason behind this, if you keep this map in mind, you will also understand
[00:00:57] the enmity correctly, this war started when, 12 years
[00:01:00] ago, a civil war broke out in Yemen, a civil war started
[00:01:04] in this part and the result of this was that the Houthis occupied
[00:01:08] a large part of Yemen, you are seeing this green part, the Houthis occupied
[00:01:12] it here, the situation was that the then
[00:01:16] President of Yemen had to flee the country and amidst all this,
[00:01:19] Saudi Arabia entered the war against the Houthis, why? Because it is a neighboring
[00:01:24] vote bank, which has been country, if there is tension below, if there
[00:01:27] is fighting, it will affect Saudi, so Saudi also started action in
[00:01:30] 2015, Saudi started military action
[00:01:34] against the Houthi rebels,
[00:01:37] Afridi has been marching since October 4. along with Saudi, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait also joined
[00:01:40] the military action, their belief was that the old government should be restored
[00:01:43] in Yemen and the Houthis should leave there, meaning there is an old government in this
[00:01:48] strict security rules. area, it should be restored throughout, but the effect of our people was the opposite,
[00:01:51] the Houthis' grip became stronger in this area, Saudi believes that Iran
[00:01:55] is behind the Houthi rebels, meaning Iran
[00:01:58] gives weapons, missiles, drones
[00:02:01] to the Houthis, in this way Yemen was divided
[00:02:05] into two parts, one is the Houthi,
[00:02:08] Iran-backed Yemen and the other part is this, separate from the Houthi
[00:02:12] occupation, this part is Saudi-backed, actually Saudi has another
[00:02:15] motive behind removing the Houthis, now come back a little, this part that you are
[00:02:19] seeing, you are seeing the Red Sea above, from the Red
[00:02:22] by calling for Sea, ships carrying oil pass from here, Saudi wants to take
[00:02:24] back the occupied area
[00:02:26] politics, watch near the Red Sea, among these is one place, this is
[00:02:30] the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait on which Saudi has its eyes because
[00:02:34] it is a sea route which is very important for trade and
[00:02:38] through this route, oil and many
[00:02:41] that is lived other things are supplied, overall the entire Saudi-Houthi fight
[00:02:45] is about control of land and water.
[00:02:47] So you must have understood
[00:02:49] why both are fighting, another fight is going on
[00:02:53] in Pakistan. In Pakistan,
[00:02:55] Imran's
[00:02:58] in the world of sports, government has been dismissed, the fight has reached this point, Imran
[00:03:01] Khan's supporters took to the streets, protesting for Imran Khan's
[00:03:04] release, demanding to release Imran.
[00:03:19] Space X will set a very affordable The protest became so big that it has been going on for many days, these Imran
[00:03:22] supporters are protesting
[00:03:25] by lighting torches, protesting by lighting mobile
[00:03:28] lights.
[00:04:06] And see what happened as a result, the result was that the Pakistan government
[00:04:09] imposed an emergency in Imran's government in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
[00:04:13] province, the government has been dismissed, Imran's
[00:04:16] CM has been dismissed.
[00:04:33] Look, people have taken to the streets, the protest against Shahbaz government's
[00:04:36] emergency has started in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, hooliganism,
[00:04:39] emergency,
[00:04:40] Imran, your beloved,
[00:04:43] countless, countless,
[00:04:46] The rules are exactly the same and beloved, countless, countless and after that,
[00:04:49] not only that, the police started firing bullets
[00:04:53] on the protesters, this person is running, firing is happening
[00:04:57] from behind, bullets are also being fired.
[00:05:14] They should not do this. Now, the situation in KPK
[00:05:18] will be very
[00:05:19] bad.
[00:05:24] Now, let me tell you why all this
[00:05:28] is happening inside Pakistan. Look,
[00:05:32] the reason behind the situation in Pakistan
[00:05:35] is this protest that has been going on for several days. The Shahbaz
[00:05:39] government of Pakistan imposed an emergency in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. And
[00:05:42] Imran Khan's PTI government here was dismissed.
[00:05:46] Pakistan's President Asif Ali Zardari announced this.
[00:05:50] Shahbaz alleges that the PTI government is not cooperating on
[00:05:54] terrorism, and is deliberately not supporting the fight against terrorism,
[00:05:58] and the Shahbaz government will not tolerate terrorism in Pakistan at all.
[00:06:01] The decision on the emergency was taken in an emergency meeting chaired
[00:06:05] by Shahbaz. In this meeting, the security situation of Khyber
[00:06:09] Pakhtunkhwa was discussed. Former Prime Minister Imran Khan's party PTI
[00:06:12] opposed this move, calling it undemocratic
[00:06:16] and expressing apprehension of increasing violence and instability.
[00:06:19] According to the Constitution of Pakistan, an emergency can be imposed when
[00:06:23] there is a war, an attack by another country, or the situation
[00:06:27] in the country deteriorates and the provincial government cannot handle it,
[00:06:31] then presidential rule is imposed. In an emergency, the center gets strong
[00:06:35] powers to interfere in the province. However, in Pakistan, this
[00:06:38] action is being linked to protest marches, because protests were going
[00:06:42] on in Pakistan for Imran's release and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's
[00:06:46] CM Sohail
[00:06:50] Two rounds of talks to stop this protest failed and
[00:06:53] in Islamabad, roads had already been blocked with containers to stop
[00:06:57] the march and now by imposing an emergency, Shahbaz
[00:07:00] has dismissed the PTI government. Listen to what
[00:07:03] opposition leader Allama Raja Nasir
[00:07:07] is saying: This is one of the darkest days in Pakistan's
[00:07:10] history. Today is October
[00:07:14] 11.
[00:07:17] It's a dark day, a dark day in Pakistan's
[00:07:20] history. It's an attack on Pakistan's constitution, an attack on Pakistan's federation, an attack on the aspirations
[00:07:24] and dreams of the people of Pakistan. They have erected walls
[00:07:27] as high as K2 in the way of a beautiful Pakistan.
[00:07:31] And let's move on to the news. Another
[00:07:35] big news today is related to Elon Musk. We will go straight to Musk's news
[00:07:39] and tell you why Musk is in the news.
[00:07:43] What is Musk's cheap plan? Arman Musk, Elon Musk,
[00:07:47] Elon Musk was very close to Donald Trump. When the elections
[00:07:50] were happening, there were also reports that the distance
[00:07:54] Nishikant Dubey said, India But it was fine until here, because
[00:07:57] a businessman does everything for business. On the other hand,
[00:08:01] Musk has now started targeting India
[00:08:04] through his own social media platform Twitter. And
[00:08:08] but India first silently watched, after
[00:08:11] that there were also counterattacks. Let me tell you now,
[00:08:15] Elon Musk has also received a strong response. What are they saying,
[00:08:18] look at the Indian politicians and how they are responding.
[00:08:21] Actually, Musk, who is the owner of Space X, the owner
[00:08:25] of Starlink, said that internet in India is cheap,
[00:08:28] so Starlink will also be cheap.
[00:08:32] price for India, because if Starlink
[00:08:35] is expensive, no one will buy it. If there is competition
[00:08:39] in the Indian market, people will get cheaper options, someone's profit may
[00:08:43] decrease, but business will not stop. On this, BJP MP
[00:08:47] is a democracy, security-related
[00:08:50] decisions are not taken under any pressure and no decision is made on the basis
[00:08:54] of social media debates. Musk should first provide cheap
[00:08:58] internet to the poor people of his own country, and then question India
[00:09:02] or offer cheap internet. After this, Musk tweeted again, he
[00:09:06] wrote that Starlink has been approved in 165
[00:09:09] countries worldwide. The company has been complying with every law of India for 5
[00:09:13] years. Despite this, why has our company not received a license?
[00:09:16] There are many areas in India where there is no internet facility. Because
[00:09:20] of this, children do not get the opportunity to get education, the products
[00:09:24] of small businessmen remain away from the global market.
[00:09:27] Starlink can bring changes to make their lives better. Is
[00:09:31] the government under pressure, which is why Starlink is being stopped? On this,
[00:09:35] Union Communications Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia replied, India
[00:09:39] does not allow monopoly in any sector.
[00:09:42] Three companies including Starlink have been given licenses. These
[00:09:46] licenses have been given for satellite communication services. However,
[00:09:49] companies cannot start commercial services immediately, they have to complete
[00:09:53] all security conditions and spectrum-related process.
[00:09:58] fair for all companies. The process is not being run by targeting
[00:10:02] one company. After this, there was political
[00:10:06] uproar and controversy, listen to what the politicians
[00:10:09] are saying? Our stand is absolutely clear, three
[00:10:12] companies have been given licenses, whenever the government fixes
[00:10:16] the revenue-based tariff system, then spectrum
[00:10:19] will be allocated to them, which is to be expected, he recognized, he recognized
[00:10:23] very late, that's the problem, right? He recognized late, now Elon Musk
[00:10:27] is Elon Musk, Elon Musk,
[00:10:30] you cannot deny that, look,
[00:10:33] consumers will benefit, the government does not want
[00:10:37] the common man to benefit, that's all there is to it, they
[00:10:41] like American businessmen very much, because they
[00:10:44] are working at the behest of America, these things have been decided, haven't they? If
[00:10:48] you are opposing businessmen, then
[00:10:52] oppose all businessmen. Let me tell you
[00:10:55] now that Elon Musk wants to provide his internet
[00:10:59] services in India, broadband services, but what
[00:11:02] is the truth? Elon Musk's satellite internet is famous
[00:11:06] by the name of Starlink, its name is Starlink, Musk
[00:11:09] claims that it has received licenses in 165
[00:11:13] countries, but many countries have banned it due to national
[00:11:17] security. The countries where it is banned include China, Russia
[00:11:21] and Iran. China has not approved it for commercial
[00:11:25] satellite internet service, because here the government has strict control
[00:11:28] over internet and telecom. Russia has also banned unauthorized
[00:11:32] satellite communication services, so Starlink is not available
[00:11:36] as a commercial service here. Actually, Space X company's
[00:11:39] Starlink connects directly to satellites, which
[00:11:43] bypasses the local broadband infrastructure. Therefore, it is also
[00:11:46] considered a big threat to the information control system. Suppose
[00:11:50] there is a war between two countries, satellite internet proves to be a game
[00:11:54] changer during wartime, especially when the fiber
[00:11:57] network on the ground has been destroyed, devastated. Starlink is not
[00:12:01] banned in India, the government has also given it a license,
[00:12:05] but many complications are stuck in its commercial launch.
[00:12:08] For example, India's satellite internet market is given with
[00:12:13] India's company is still waiting for the final security
[00:12:17] clearance for Musk's company. Only after security clearance
[00:12:21] will spectrum be allocated to it. This is
[00:12:25] the truth, listen, what do politicians say? This is not
[00:12:28] the first time that Congress leaders have demanded foreign
[00:12:32] intervention, or requested
[00:12:34] any foreign system to intervene in India's
[00:12:38] democracy, the democratically elected government of Narendra Modi
[00:12:42] is being asked to be removed
[00:12:47] foreign intervention by Congress
[00:12:50] party leaders not only in Pakistan, but also in Europe.
[00:12:54] Relations will deteriorate,
[00:13:25] all satellite services will be shut
[00:13:28] down at that time. So you were listening
[00:13:32] to Sambit Patra, what I told you, because he
[00:13:36] has not received clearance yet,
[00:19:07] In the race, China has infused AI so deeply into the veins of its society
[00:19:11] that now the people there, forgetting human
[00:19:14] relationships, are entangled in the मोहपाश of virtual AI
[00:19:18] friends. The situation is such that the Chinese government itself has to issue guidelines
[00:19:22] to rein in AI. In the court,
[00:19:25] let's open the AI files of two countries, India
[00:19:29] and China, which cover 35 percent of the world's
[00:19:31] population.
[00:19:51] From the streets of Beijing to the factories of Wenzhou, and from these robotic
[00:19:55] fish swimming in the West Lake to the robot
[00:19:58] Olympics held a few days ago, no one doubts that China has made
[00:20:02] AI its new fuel for its growth and
[00:20:05] economy. From
[00:20:08] citizen service helplines to startups in Beijing, AI
[00:20:12] is dominant everywhere.
[00:20:14] China thought
[00:20:21] that it would become the world's superpower on the strength of this technology, but it
[00:20:25] probably had no idea that this technology would shake
[00:20:29] the foundations of its social
[00:20:30] system.
[00:20:34] The New York Times has published a report on this very challenge
[00:20:37] of China. The essence of the report is that China wanted
[00:20:41] its citizens to adopt AI, but now they have become its slaves.
[00:20:44] The report gives some examples. A farmer
[00:20:47] relied on wrong advice from an AI chatbot and lost
[00:20:51] his 25-acre crop. Small children have fallen in love with AI
[00:20:54] avatars, abandoning human parents. Chinese youth are spending
[00:20:58] time with virtual partners instead of marrying or
[00:21:02] loving real humans. Citing data, the report also
[00:21:06] says that more than 20% of minors in China do not want to talk
[00:21:09] to real humans anymore. They only want to chat with AI.
[00:21:13] So, just like a human gets addicted to drugs,
[00:21:17] has a human in China become addicted to AI? The question is also
[00:22:20] that it is not just China's problem, because India is also
[00:22:23] moving forward with AI in many core sectors like agriculture, health.
[00:22:27] This means India considers AI as a growth engine, but does not want
[00:22:31] to leave it unregulated. The government has also made it clear that India
[00:22:34] is going to bring rules to regulate AI. Regarding
[00:22:38] how AI should be regulated in the future, it has been decided
[00:22:42] that a consultation paper will be floated in the next one month.
[00:22:45] This will include issues related to AI safety, cyber
[00:22:49] security, benefits and harms of AI,
[00:22:53] and especially to ensure that the benefits of AI
[00:22:56] reach everyone, every section of society,
[00:22:58] and to protect against harmful things like deepfakes,
[00:23:02] a consultation paper will be floated, on the basis
[00:23:05] of which AI regulations will be made later.
[00:23:09] Now, why might such rules be needed? This can also be understood with an
[00:23:13] example. The first case is from Maharajganj
[00:23:16] in Uttar Pradesh, where a 22-year-old youth, just for likes and followers,
[00:23:20] created a 9-second AI-generated fake video of blowing up an SSB camp
[00:23:23] on the India-Nepal border. Security agencies were alarmed
[00:23:27] and the accused was arrested within 24
[00:23:30] hours.
[00:23:34] Similarly, another case of AI misuse remained in the headlines.
[00:23:38] An obscene morphed video of actress Janhvi Kapoor
[00:23:41] created with AI from the song "Chhuttamalle" from the film "Tevar". When
[00:23:45] this digital sexual assault went viral, South stars Vijay Deverakonda
[00:23:48] and Jr. NTR said in strong
[00:24:14] terms that human identity, voice, and face are also at risk. And in view of this threat, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has applied to trademark her voice.
[00:24:18] That is,
[00:24:50] I am Giorgia, because Meloni fears that someone
[00:24:54] might steal her voice, or misuse it.
[00:24:58] Meloni's fear is not baseless, because she herself
[00:25:01] has been a victim of deepfake's heinous conspiracies.
[00:25:05] In 2024, her fake obscene videos were uploaded on the internet,
[00:25:08] against which she also filed a lawsuit for 1 lakh
[00:25:12] euros in damages. In May 2026, her deepfake objectionable
[00:25:15] photos were also made viral. Then Meloni, while expressing her pain,
[00:25:19] said that she can fight, but how will the common
[00:25:22] man deal with this digital attack? Now understand
[00:25:25] how dangerous this game is? AI only needs a few seconds
[00:25:28] of anyone's recording, it copies the intonation of the voice,
[00:25:32] the tone of speaking and the rate of
[00:25:42] the mat. He will not spread
[00:25:46] the mat.
[00:25:49] This fight of 80-20 has come again.
[00:25:53] 80 percent in NDA and 20 percent
[00:25:56] in PDA. 20 is nothing, 80
[00:25:59] are with us, big claims. If the chief ministers
[00:26:02] who make big claims are so confident, then
[00:26:06] they should contest elections from Ayodhya themselves
[00:26:08] and show. The fight should be face
[00:26:12] to face. Come, you also file nomination
[00:26:15] in Ayodhya and I will also try my luck
[00:26:18] from Ayodhya. We will go to the mosque, offer
[00:26:22] prayers, but cannot go
[00:26:24] to the temple.
[00:26:26] Now Abdul will not spread the mat,
[00:26:29] Baba and brother, now you
[00:26:33] have to spread the mat
[00:27:01] The political mat has been spread in Uttar Pradesh,
[00:27:04] the pawns have been arranged on the political chessboard,
[00:27:08] but the question is, will Abdul
[00:27:11] walk on this spread mat? Now you must be
[00:27:14] wondering, who is this Abdul? Abdul means
[00:27:18] that 20 percent population
[00:27:22] of Uttar Pradesh, that 20 percent Muslim
[00:27:27] considered the biggest key to victory for every
[00:27:30] party in every election. Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has once
[00:27:34] again thrown the dice of 80 versus 20,
[00:27:38] but on this chessboard of 2027,
[00:27:41] the story is not just about this formula,
[00:27:44] the real fire is being tried to be lit
[00:27:47] within that 20 percent. Asaduddin Owaisi, who came
[00:27:51] from Hyderabad, as soon as the deadline of October
[00:27:54] 2 passed, announced to contest alone on 200
[00:27:58] seats. Owaisi's direct challenge:
[00:28:01] Abdul will no longer spread anyone's mat,
[00:28:05] he will snatch his share. The question
[00:28:09] is, will the great battle of 2027
[00:28:13] remain confined to this electoral experiment
[00:28:16] and amidst this political dilemma, what
[00:28:20] is Abdul of UP thinking? For a complete
[00:28:24] analysis of these burning questions in UP's
[00:28:29] our special exclusive report: UP's Abdul,
[00:28:33] from mat to stake.
[00:28:53] will show,
[00:28:57] will make sit, the 80-20 fight
[00:29:00] has come again.
[00:29:33] That is
[00:29:33] Abdul,
[00:29:39] on whose shoulders sometimes the flag of socialism was placed
[00:29:43] and sometimes he was made to spread the mat
[00:29:46] by citing secularism, but in the politics
[00:29:50] of UP standing at the threshold of 2027, will
[00:29:53] the direction of political winds change
[00:29:56] this time?
[00:30:01] Abdul will not spread the mat.