PAKISTANTV — broadcast
20260806 123000 UTC
504 transcript segments
Google Speech-to-Text API Automatic Transcription (Chirp)
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] has been mentioning that this war
[00:00:03] has the strategic
[00:00:05] of end of not
[00:00:07] of allowing Iran uh to have nuclear
[00:00:09] program nuclear bomb and of course that
[00:00:13] means uh we have to negotiate their nuclear program and highly enriched
[00:00:17] uranium
[00:00:18] but obviously over the last weeks that there has been uh
[00:00:22] much talk about
[00:00:23] of another
[00:00:24] of strategic
[00:00:24] uh end for this war which is not allowing Iran to control the straight
[00:00:28] of her moves this This
[00:00:30] of is why it's very likely that the language will hear from President Trump
[00:00:33] after that agreement comes to light is that it doesn't
[00:00:37] give Iran control over the straight of hermooz, but it gives it some
[00:00:41] kind of control over allowing ships
[00:00:45] of to transit through the Iranian
[00:00:48] waterways so that there will be time to
[00:00:52] of clear the waterway in
[00:00:53] of between of Oman and Iran from the mines which the IRGC has
[00:00:57] planted during the war time. and there will be talk in
[00:01:01] Washington also that after the 60 days supposedly there will be
[00:01:04] nobody controlling the straight of
[00:01:06] of hermus uh obviously the Iranians will try to say that this
[00:01:10] is an interim agreement but after the 60 days there will be some kind
[00:01:14] of control or sovereignty the Iranians will have over the straight off
[00:01:18] so I think the language will remain
[00:01:20] in a way ambiguous which will give kind of
[00:01:25] a margin of for each side to say that this agreement represents
[00:01:28] victory uh for Washington. and even for Tehran uh, but
[00:01:32] the focus in Washington is on phase two, and this is why I
[00:01:35] mentioned earlier in my
[00:01:37] of comments that Washington is
[00:01:40] moving from coersive diplomacy if you
[00:01:43] of will, which we are still having because there is still military pressure, but towards
[00:01:47] another kind of diplomacy, which is phase diplomacy, meaning that we
[00:01:51] want to finish with phase number two, get the straight of hermus open
[00:01:55] for international navigation and move towards phase number two, which
[00:01:59] is discussing with the... Iranians, their nuclear
[00:02:02] of program and their highly enriched uranium, and that will again be under
[00:02:06] military pressure, because if these negotiations fail, we will be
[00:02:09] again uh going back to the air campaign and targeting other
[00:02:13] possibly uh military uh targets within the Iranian
[00:02:17] borders. uh, in other words, the focus in the coming 60 days will
[00:02:21] be on what President Trump said from the early days of this
[00:02:25] war, that the strategy is to make
[00:02:27] of sure that
[00:02:28] of Iran doesn't have uh nuclear capabilities uh
[00:02:32] for military purposes, but this is let's remember, this is again
[00:02:36] going to
[00:02:39] of be very uh long process, because at the end it's not going to be in numbers only, there will
[00:02:43] be lot of technical talks, there will
[00:02:46] of be lot of discussions also on the verification measures, it's not only enough to
[00:02:50] say that this is what Iran
[00:02:51] a is allowed to do and what not allowed to do, there should be kind
[00:02:54] of
[00:02:56] of of measuring and verification uh processes and that
[00:03:00] means necessarily that there should be other parties involved, this could be the
[00:03:04] Europeans, this could be the
[00:03:07] a for example, and there should be also some kind
[00:03:11] of agreement over
[00:03:14] of if a Iran doesn't doesn't of
[00:03:18] of course follow these agreed upon measures, what are the
[00:03:21] consequences? will we have back economic
[00:03:25] sanctions imposed on Iran, will there be kind
[00:03:28] of of military procedures? "these are all questions which remain, in my opinion
[00:03:32] if we are successfully moving from phase one
[00:03:36] straight of hermus towards the second phase,
[00:03:40] a there could be possibility of
[00:03:41] a extending possibly the 60 days to other 60 days if there
[00:03:45] is
[00:03:45] of positive signence that these these talks are going in the right
[00:03:49] direction, but there is lot of of of devil in the
[00:03:53] details as they say, and i
[00:03:57] think from what i hear from the Iranian" officials, as I mentioned
[00:04:01] earlier in my comments, the straight of hermus will remain a
[00:04:04] very much hedging point in all these discussions
[00:04:08] of and this will give leverage also to the Iranians
[00:04:12] to prolong the talks regarding the nuclear program,
[00:04:16] and there is an opinion in Iran, let's remember this, that this
[00:04:19] war and these negotiations can outlive
[00:04:23] the US administration, the current Trump administration,
[00:04:27] of and that is possibly something Trump will not... allow to happen,
[00:04:31] so we may hear at sometimes and see sometimes
[00:04:34] reverting again to military action, so there is lot to wait and see,
[00:04:38] and i i think again there is
[00:04:41] a divel always in these details. right, thank you very much, dr.
[00:04:45] fad i for joining us and being a part
[00:04:47] of the news
[00:04:48] of room today, there's of course lot of aspects to this discussion
[00:04:51] moving forward, and we're going to be taking a look at that in further detail as the
[00:04:55] situation progresses, especially in terms of what the agreement
[00:04:59] between. and
[00:05:00] is going to transpire towards, that will be the focus of course for
[00:05:04] another day, and next we're going to take a look at what is happening
[00:05:08] as
[00:05:08] of part
[00:05:08] of the very important induswaters treaty and what India has held in.
[00:05:13] This is very, very integral issue for Pakistan and something
[00:05:16] that India cannot do as part the treaty, and the kind of
[00:05:20] international legal course that it's taking is also
[00:05:23] validating Pakistan stoms on the matter, and we're going to be taking
[00:05:27] closer look at what that means and what are the future options for the country. For
[00:05:31] that, we've been joined by Dr. Huma Bakai is security analyst from Karachi. Thank you
[00:05:35] very much Dr. Homa for being part the show today. I'd like your
[00:05:38] perspective in terms of what you think will be the next steps. part the
[00:05:42] permanent court of arbitration, we've seen that despite
[00:05:46] India's status and claim of holding the treaty an
[00:05:50] abence, which of course it cannot do, we've seen that the international momentum
[00:05:53] is continued, the permanent court of arbitration is also moving forward with its work as
[00:05:57] part the neutral process to in terms of what is happening
[00:06:01] legally, how do you think that the situation is going evolve further
[00:06:05] if India continues to not participate in
[00:06:09] these legal proceedings and does not provide the data that
[00:06:12] it is as to do so? well, frankly
[00:06:15] speaking, India is on very thin
[00:06:18] eyes. there is nothing in this that goes in favor of
[00:06:22] India so to say, because it is on the wrong side of international
[00:06:26] law, and it will also fall on the wrong side of
[00:06:29] history. the only thing that is problematic at this moment
[00:06:33] in time is that India takes an inspiration from
[00:06:36] Israel, and India, especially under Modi, thinks
[00:06:40] that it can buy, marginalized
[00:06:44] international norms, but this particular
[00:06:46] treaty, indus water treaty is one the most successful
[00:06:50] confidence building measures or institutional
[00:06:54] arrangement that has existed between two nuclear
[00:06:58] armed neighbors who are are not in
[00:07:01] very good relationship, we are very india centric in our
[00:07:05] security construct, india is very pakistan centric in its
[00:07:09] security construct and that is sort of depicted. by the
[00:07:12] deployment India does and by the military build
[00:07:16] up that it does, so and when did this happen? this happened
[00:07:20] after India used terrorism, the bogi it has been
[00:07:24] using for now 20 years to sort of
[00:07:28] inflict pain on Pakistan, and when it was defeated in the
[00:07:31] sindoor operation, it continued with the so-called
[00:07:35] abiance. now the term abiance does not
[00:07:38] exist in the lingua the treaty itself.
[00:07:43] so there is no justification that India has to carry
[00:07:47] on with this, but more importantly, if this
[00:07:50] treaty fails or collapses, then
[00:07:54] essentially we are setting a very dangerous
[00:07:57] precedence of institutional
[00:08:01] umbrellas for treaties or how treaties will function
[00:08:05] in the future, and that is why I think the timing
[00:08:09] the way India is behaving is extremely critical.
[00:08:12] "and
[00:08:13] that is why the international pressure must come upon India
[00:08:17] to call back this abiance on how
[00:08:21] you think that the treaty will actually collapse, you mention that that's
[00:08:25] going to be disaster, but in terms the legal protocols
[00:08:29] and safeguards that are in place as part the Indus Waters treaty,
[00:08:32] how exactly do you think it will collapse if India of course completely refuses its
[00:08:36] international obligations continues to act in ways that
[00:08:40] it is already doing so and working towards..." is there no
[00:08:43] consequence embedded within the system to be able to hold India
[00:08:47] accountable or stop its actions? I say the present
[00:08:50] global situation is red flag. It is how
[00:08:54] international organizations are being marginalized and they are
[00:08:58] unable to hold states accountable. The whole concept of
[00:09:01] collective security is more diluted today than ever before
[00:09:05] and also the institutional umbrellas because of it. But having
[00:09:09] said this, India needs to realize that Pakistan has
[00:09:13] time and again exercised strategic restraint in responding to
[00:09:16] India about what it is doing with the water, India has been using water
[00:09:20] as a weapon for Pakistan for years now,
[00:09:23] and Pakistan has constantly exercised strategic
[00:09:26] restraint in responding to that, but more
[00:09:29] recently the military leadership of Pakistan has
[00:09:33] been more categorical, they say the lifeline of Pakistan
[00:09:37] will is touched by India or if water organiz to
[00:09:40] point where it hurts Pakistan.
[00:09:42] the then Indian Pakistan may respond back in
[00:09:46] terms which you will can be painful for India, so I think that is
[00:09:50] the consequence of this, and moreover, can India really
[00:09:54] afford to go to war with Pakistan? hasn't the sindoor operation
[00:09:57] taught enough lessons as had enough lessons for the Indians,
[00:10:01] so what they eventually do is that they do wars by
[00:10:05] other means,
[00:10:06] putting interest water treaty and abiance is the
[00:10:10] Indian attempt of war. by other means
[00:10:14] Pakistan has acted with maturity, it has
[00:10:18] acted, it has exercised strategic restraint, but
[00:10:22] water is something else, water is Pakistan.
[00:10:25] lifeline and there if it
[00:10:29] continues the way it is and from saying that
[00:10:32] it is held in abiance it starts diverting
[00:10:35] Pakistan's water or India is very water stressed
[00:10:39] country
[00:10:39] it has designs of irrigating a desert
[00:10:42] Rajasthan and all of that has implications for
[00:10:46] Pakistan and India has been trying to get out the treaty for
[00:10:49] years India has been talking about Indus water treaty to India is talking
[00:10:53] about climate as a factor. which should impact in the
[00:10:57] the water flows into Pakistan, so India has been trying to find
[00:11:01] ways to cut water Pakistan's water or to flood
[00:11:04] Pakistan, does this weaponization of water needs
[00:11:08] to stop, and absolutely, I mean it's
[00:11:12] fairly obvious that when India says the treaty is in abiance
[00:11:15] then it's trying to get out the treaty, if you look at the clauses the treaty, it
[00:11:19] is neither time specific nor event
[00:11:22] specific nor government specific, it
[00:11:26] is between two states brokered by the world bank. if
[00:11:30] it is not event specific, how can use India
[00:11:34] use false flag operation of which it could provide
[00:11:38] no proof or evidence to India or the intern to Pakistan or the
[00:11:41] international community, how can it use it,
[00:11:45] how can it use it to put the treaty in abiance when the treaty itself does
[00:11:49] not have clause of abiance, something which has been stated by
[00:11:53] the abitation court. in June
[00:11:56] 2025, so like I said, India is on very thin
[00:11:59] ice, as per water laws, there is no
[00:12:03] way India can get away with this, right,
[00:12:07] absolutely. Dr. Hima, when we take a look
[00:12:11] at the actions
[00:12:12] that then of course correspond
[00:12:14] to climate change
[00:12:16] and climate introduced disasters in Pakistan, it's an added war for the
[00:12:20] country, we've seen even now that there are warnings
[00:12:24] with regards to... rains and the impact that it creates and then of course with the
[00:12:27] kind of actions India takes that also adds to the troubles that Pakistan is
[00:12:31] facing, how much of this constitutes as water terrorism and how can
[00:12:35] Pakistan talk about this with not just the world bank or the permanent court of
[00:12:39] arbitration, but also other other departments that
[00:12:43] are looking into climate justice and climate financing, how can
[00:12:47] those platforms also be made aware of what
[00:12:50] is being added to this issue because the Indus Waters
[00:12:54] treat. in the actions that India is taking, well Pakistan is raised
[00:12:58] the issue at the United Nations, Pakistan is raised this, it's taken to
[00:13:02] taken it to the mediators, it has done its share of water diplomacy, we've
[00:13:06] just recently had water summit in Pakistan where we
[00:13:10] identified all these issues and there were scholars, it was an international
[00:13:14] summit, there were scholars from all over the world who validated Pakistan's point of
[00:13:18] view, actually you know this is something I said right at the beginning of this
[00:13:22] conversation, it's not that what
[00:13:25] India can do or what India is doing is right or not? right
[00:13:29] now the question is that is is India trying to get
[00:13:32] away with weaponizing water against
[00:13:36] Pakistan by sort of taking advantage
[00:13:40] of a global environment which allows violations of
[00:13:44] international law and they go
[00:13:46] unpunished. That is a real concern, not so
[00:13:50] it's not a bilateral issue between Pakistan and India,
[00:13:53] it's this should be an issue. which should be source of worry for all
[00:13:57] the treaties and the sec and the and the architect security
[00:14:01] architecture that exist under these
[00:14:04] treaties, because if treaty violations becomes norm and there
[00:14:08] are no repercussions for it, it is not just a problem for Pakistan,
[00:14:12] then it's a global issue, there's several other
[00:14:16] issues that several other treaties that exist, and by the
[00:14:19] way, the issue starts because what India has
[00:14:23] also been hedging, sharing of data, you sharing is
[00:14:27] caring, so sharing the data is the first step towards this
[00:14:31] confidence building measure, something that India has been trying to
[00:14:35] prevent for years now, and to
[00:14:39] keep the optics alive, they will send a commission to
[00:14:42] Pakistan, but then continue to violate the treaty by building
[00:14:46] up dams or diverting water, which Pakistan has also
[00:14:50] identified as violation the treaty and taken it to
[00:14:54] the courts. and the relevant forums, but our concern
[00:14:58] right now is that will this come to point where Pakistan will have to
[00:15:02] respond to this bilaterally, if the international community
[00:15:05] fails to restraint India for continuing to
[00:15:09] violate this treaty, and the first step should be that it takes back the
[00:15:13] stance that the treaty is abiance because it has no legal roots, no
[00:15:17] legal standing, the treaty does not allow you to
[00:15:21] put it into an abiance, it is not event specific.
[00:15:25] but what India has turned it into is event
[00:15:28] specific treaty abinence, it
[00:15:32] it is trying to get out the treaty over event for which it has no
[00:15:35] proof, it could neither give any proof, first it cannot do it, even if it
[00:15:39] is true, it is not,
[00:15:41] it is false flag operation, India could not provide any
[00:15:45] evidence to Pakistan, to its own
[00:15:48] people, to its own parliaments and of
[00:15:52] course to the international community, I mean India has been called out for it,
[00:15:56] for what it is doing by its own people, especially the Modi government, so
[00:16:00] I just wonder if issue like water can be
[00:16:03] held hostage by the toxicity of politics in a country.
[00:16:07] which is now revolting against its own form of its
[00:16:11] own government, its own leader and
[00:16:15] absolutely understand that that of course has to change, but unfortunately there's so
[00:16:19] much that is being made in India and this is of course affecting not
[00:16:22] just real peace and stability but India itself. thank you so much dr. huma bikai for
[00:16:26] joining us and being a part the news room today we'll take a look at another aspect
[00:16:30] that is closely linked with India's actions and that of course is
[00:16:33] yome SSL that is being observed today and this Mark
[00:16:38] India's illegal actions and unilateral actions it is
[00:16:41] taken to revoke the special status the occupied territory
[00:16:45] which it cannot do so it still remains a disputed territory as per
[00:16:49] the UN security council resolutions and must be solved accordingly for this we've
[00:16:53] been joined by Mr. Altaf Husan Vani who's a
[00:16:56] Kashmiri leader thank you so much Vani sah for being part the show
[00:17:00] today in your perspective when we're taking a look at uh what has
[00:17:04] has happened about seven years ago now this is of course the
[00:17:08] continuous struggle the people of Kashmir have been facing, but what is
[00:17:12] fundamentally very, very important to keep on remembering about
[00:17:15] what happened on the 5th of August in
[00:17:18] 2019? Thank you
[00:17:22] very much for having me, we all know that Kashmir
[00:17:25] remained always under the Indian occupation right since
[00:17:29] 1947, the occupation was brutal, it
[00:17:33] was militarized, it has done every sort
[00:17:36] of... injury to the hearts and minds the people of Indian
[00:17:40] occupied Jammu and Kashmir, but what happened on 5th of August
[00:17:44] 2019 was that India betrayed its
[00:17:48] own constitution, it violated its own constitution and by violating
[00:17:52] its own constitution it took away the the
[00:17:55] constitution which was given to the people of India and occupied Kashmir, the flag which
[00:17:59] was given to them and dismembered the state into two union
[00:18:03] territories and why India did it
[00:18:07] we
[00:18:08] these are two things on one hand that the current Indian government which is
[00:18:12] led by BJP and it's the
[00:18:15] ideological background is RSS, it was their main motive
[00:18:19] to remove these articles from the day
[00:18:23] one and so they removed this in order to change the
[00:18:27] demography of Indian occupied Jammu Kashmir
[00:18:29] implement the Hinduta
[00:18:32] ideology its agenda in Indian occupied Jammu and Kashmir
[00:18:36] to make it a Hindu majority area and to put
[00:18:40] more and more Hindus there and thereeb they changed many laws
[00:18:44] in Kashmir and they
[00:18:46] did a constitutional assault in inoccupied Kashmir along
[00:18:50] with the military assault the draconian laws which they had already
[00:18:54] emplied there so from 5th of August
[00:18:57] onwards we saw the land grab, we saw the demographic
[00:19:01] change, we saw the jerymandering of assembly segments in such a
[00:19:04] way that the more... more and more
[00:19:08] Hindus come to the this state
[00:19:11] assembly that which now is called the
[00:19:14] union territories unfortunately and
[00:19:17] also we could see the eraser of
[00:19:21] Kashmiri's identity, Kashmir's literature, Kashmir is
[00:19:24] culture, and at the top of it we have
[00:19:28] seen that how the militarized governance in
[00:19:32] Indian occupied Kashmir has intensified
[00:19:35] since 2000. 19
[00:19:39] onwards
[00:19:39] on one hand they staged drama of elections in
[00:19:43] 2024 at directions the Indian Supreme Court but
[00:19:47] unfortunately that elected government which is
[00:19:51] which has been installed over there that lacks any powers every power
[00:19:55] is held by the left hand governor
[00:19:59] who is directly under the Indian home ministry
[00:20:03] Amit Shah is running the show in Kashmir so Kashmiri
[00:20:06] people Muslims of Kashmir have not only be
[00:20:10] disintegrated, they have been disempowered, they have been
[00:20:13] dehumanized, their land is being taken, we have seen
[00:20:17] from 20
[00:20:20] 19 onwards that assault on the
[00:20:24] properties the people, the people, the those who
[00:20:28] are struggling for this right to self information,
[00:20:32] their properties have been confiscated, their lands have been
[00:20:36] confiscated. "their houses are being
[00:20:39] demolished a very small incident which happens over there,
[00:20:43] which India itself creates a security situation crisis in
[00:20:47] Kashmir and thereeby a collective punishment. to the people
[00:20:51] of Kashmir is handed over by the
[00:20:54] Indian forces, by the Indian
[00:20:58] these with arm with the draconian laws,
[00:21:01] nobody can speak for that, even the human rights
[00:21:04] defenders or were
[00:21:07] for all these this time they were behind the
[00:21:11] b, only few days back the two
[00:21:15] of human rights defenders, one noted human rights defender of Kashmir Koram Parvez
[00:21:19] and Irfan Miraj, they were released by
[00:21:23] the court, but they were asked to stay in New Delhi
[00:21:26] 900 kilometers away from their home and
[00:21:30] not to speak publicly, not to give any public
[00:21:33] statement, not to talk to press and not to do the work they
[00:21:36] used to do to document the human rights violence in Kashmir,
[00:21:40] so the eraser of memory in Kashmir, the the
[00:21:44] eraser of our culture and all that, and at the top of it
[00:21:47] is the threat to the...
[00:21:51] to the religious rights in Kashmir, we could see that on
[00:21:55] one hand yatra is conducted under full
[00:21:58] security, more and more Hindus are encouraged to visit
[00:22:01] the Amarnath and to
[00:22:05] what what they are causing there, people have seen the images
[00:22:09] that how the environment and ecology of Palgam and Nal
[00:22:13] Loder is being disturbed by these lots of
[00:22:17] pilgrimage, but on the other hand people the... Muslims of Kashmir are
[00:22:21] not allowed even to gather together on the eight
[00:22:24] congressions, they are not allowed to gather together on Friday
[00:22:28] congrations, the leaders are being put behind the bars
[00:22:32] and all the shines and masks have been taken over
[00:22:36] by the work board which is run by the government, so the
[00:22:39] surveillance of masks of imams and everybody coming to the
[00:22:43] mask is being scanned everywhere and
[00:22:47] all those political parties have been banned. religious parties have been banned, their
[00:22:51] schools have been taken away, so this is how India
[00:22:55] is implementing it is settler colonism in Indian
[00:22:58] occupied Kashmir, that
[00:23:00] colonism to is an
[00:23:04] ideological colonism through Hinduta
[00:23:07] mindset. Right, also when we take
[00:23:11] a look at the ways in which the
[00:23:14] BJP government is acting, not just in
[00:23:18] the occupied valley but of... or other parts of India, we
[00:23:22] have seen that there is at least some sort of opposition to those
[00:23:26] actions that is sparking now in different parts the
[00:23:30] country, how do you think that Indian voices are also
[00:23:33] at what is happening in the illegally occupied uh
[00:23:37] territory and what really do you think can be
[00:23:41] made difference because of those voices to the state of
[00:23:44] affairs?
[00:23:49] there was... once once upon a time there was a indian civil
[00:23:52] society which used to speak for the human rights
[00:23:56] violation in indian occupied jammu and kashmir not nearly the political
[00:23:59] rights but the human rights abuses which Indian armed forces w
[00:24:03] committing over there they used to speak for that you
[00:24:06] have know how Arundathi raitam navlakkha
[00:24:10] and others w treated they were those were charged
[00:24:14] with sadition why you are talking about the
[00:24:18] rights the people of kashmir you have seen the students protest in
[00:24:22] JNU, how those students are sittle
[00:24:25] facing the reprisals and persecution
[00:24:29] by the Indian government, so even those
[00:24:32] san people in India who used to speak for the rights the people of
[00:24:36] Kashmir, violence, their voices were already silenced
[00:24:40] by this government, but more recently the Indians have come
[00:24:44] to know after this jantar mantar attacks and jantar
[00:24:48] mantar protest when the plats will fire there, they came to
[00:24:52] know what really the pat gun is,
[00:24:55] because before that they did not know how these patrot injuries have
[00:24:59] been have caused the blindness in Kashmir which the New York
[00:25:03] Times called the year of blind eyes,
[00:25:07] so epidemic of blind eyes, so the Indian civil society
[00:25:11] has also been taken over by these hindu, you see that
[00:25:15] each and every organ of state in India has
[00:25:19] been taken over. by these hindu
[00:25:22] extremist groups and these are condoned by the Indian
[00:25:26] government, there the Indian government condoms each and
[00:25:30] every act we have seen those people rapping the Muslim
[00:25:33] girl and then the the high court and the courts
[00:25:37] release them and they are being garlanded by the BJP leaders, all the
[00:25:41] BJP leaders and even the chief minister
[00:25:44] of UP and also that Haryana is
[00:25:48] on record when the article 370 and 35 was
[00:25:52] obrigated how they issued hate
[00:25:56] based statements against the people of kashmir and
[00:26:00] muslims in of course is adding to what is
[00:26:03] happening in the occupied valley and must be something
[00:26:07] that has to have the attention the international community, what Pakistan of
[00:26:11] course essentially aims to do
[00:26:13] by observing your Lal, thank you very much for joining us, Mr.
[00:26:17] Afwani, and we're going to be of course focusing on this issue not just
[00:26:20] today, but um time and again Pakistan has made it
[00:26:24] very clear to the international community where it stands, and this is very
[00:26:28] important to be observed and highlighted that the aspart.
[00:26:33] the people of Kashmir are very integral and the
[00:26:37] ways in which their self-determination and the fight for it has
[00:26:40] continued for decades must continue and of course Pakistan's
[00:26:44] resolve is there in terms of any kind of support towards
[00:26:48] that. That's all that we have from the news room today. We'll now see you
[00:26:51] tomorrow.
[00:27:23] Hello and welcome to experts corner, this is Mahin Jap
[00:27:25] free.
[00:27:31] I think Trump one seat of. to go to
[00:27:33] war,
[00:27:38] only congress can actually undo the sanctions, so
[00:27:42] whatever Trump says, it has to go through congress. one the
[00:27:46] key weapons that Iran is using
[00:27:47] the straight of moves for is leverage against the US. having a US presence on
[00:27:51] your territory has made you more likely to be attacked.
[00:27:55] realignments taking place to counter the Israelis and that
[00:27:58] includes your country, pakistan, along with...
[00:28:17] Hello and welcome to onfold, I am aggressor is on
[00:28:21] the Israel that is violating all the international rules and
[00:28:24] law, actually the crisis had started about
[00:28:28] two to three decades before the United States under the pressure of Israel.
[00:28:32] wants to degrade the military
[00:28:35] capacity of Iran to control the straight of
[00:28:39] homus has to decide especially now
[00:28:43] that you don't have a unified leadership, what you have on the
[00:28:47] ground is a tri patriot
[00:28:50] coalition for Iran this is exactly the point not to make things
[00:28:54] hard for the average person but to retain some leverage in these
[00:28:57] negotiations on the part the Iranians, the Iranian supreme
[00:29:01] leader. now finds himself
[00:29:04] pressured by both pro government uh public clamoring for
[00:29:08] retribution. Mr. Witkof and Kuschner and
[00:29:11] others went with the template that they
[00:29:15] designed for
[00:29:17] Gaza.
[00:29:28] Before the wistle glows, before the final bell, there is the...
[00:29:32] station, it's a language understood by every stadium
[00:29:36] on every street corner, it's a moment your heartbeats with
[00:29:40] million others, it's a roar of
[00:29:44] crowd, the silence of anticipation, it's
[00:29:48] a trimeful cry of a champion,
[00:29:51] it's more than a game, it's a
[00:29:53] connection
[00:29:58] tv speaks to the
[00:30:00] world.
[00:30:26] Good evening, assalamualaikum, you're watching Pakistan TV, i am fahim
[00:30:30] bangish, let's first take a look at in headlines for the
[00:30:33] hour.
[00:30:50] Prime Minister Shahbas Sharif departs for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
[00:30:54] a three-day visit from the 6th to the 8th of August. The prime
[00:30:58] minister is accompanied by a high-level