PAKISTANTV — broadcast
20260806 203000 UTC
445 transcript segments
Google Speech-to-Text API Automatic Transcription (Chirp)
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] now we're rebuilding it and we're using
[00:00:02] munitions that
[00:00:04] me are very powerful, very good, but we wouldn't have been using them, we
[00:00:08] could
[00:00:08] in have used something else, but these are a little
[00:00:12] bit older type, equally as effective,
[00:00:16] and we
[00:00:17] it it's things that we have so much, plus we have supplies of
[00:00:21] munitions all over the world that if we ever needed them we take
[00:00:24] that, we're supplied all over the world, but
[00:00:28] uh
[00:00:29] of we
[00:00:29] have we're in very... very very good
[00:00:31] of shape. Russia seems to have increased their attacks
[00:00:33] of on,
[00:00:34] of that must be a concerned, well it's
[00:00:38] look, we're not
[00:00:39] of involved from the standpoint, it's uh, we're separated by an
[00:00:42] ocean, but I hate to see 25,00 young people a
[00:00:46] month get killed, and that's what's happening between Russia and Ukraine, they're
[00:00:50] losing average 25,000, mostly soldiers a
[00:00:54] month,
[00:00:55] a and we're working on it, and I think we're making progress,
[00:00:59] but "it's a violent, very violent war, there's a lot of hatred in
[00:01:03] of that war, lot of hatred between the two leaders. I settle eight
[00:01:07] wars, I thought this would be maybe one
[00:01:09] of the easier ones and it turned out to be the most
[00:01:13] of of of difficult, but progress is being made. Thank you
[00:01:14] of very much
[00:01:16] of of everybody,
[00:01:19] of
[00:01:23] of US president Donald Trump speaking in
[00:01:27] Washington DC reiterated as administration sp. focus on ending the Russian Ukraine
[00:01:31] war
[00:01:31] of through diplomatic efforts while stressing that peace remains a top foreign policy
[00:01:35] priority, he also highlighted his economic agenda, saying his
[00:01:38] administration remains committed to boosting investment, creating jobs,
[00:01:42] lowering cost for American families and strengthening the
[00:01:45] of US me economy. Trump said his administration will continue pursuing
[00:01:48] in policies aimed at economic growth alongside efforts to address major international
[00:01:52] challenges including the ongoing conflict of Ukraine and
[00:01:55] Russia.
[00:01:59] That's it. for the moment for more
[00:02:00] of details and live streaming blog to our website pakistantv.com take
[00:02:04] care.
[00:02:38] Choice over there at the very helm of affairs, but rather to
[00:02:41] of their utter surprise and shock, what they got was more
[00:02:45] hardlineine leadership and that is what their stance, the
[00:02:49] Iranian stance has been consolidating over the last five months and they are
[00:02:53] not going to back off, and also when you talk about the
[00:02:56] of state of homo scenario, the control
[00:02:58] of the Iranians has inc. and it will continue to
[00:03:01] increase in the coming days as this particular
[00:03:05] conflict on forma shahin we'd like to have
[00:03:07] your comment thank you, think i would want to comment on this
[00:03:11] particularly with regards to the latest developments as we have seen
[00:03:15] of them of happening, think in this regard what is most important to talk about is the
[00:03:19] state of homose issue which we have seen at least to some extent to the
[00:03:22] extent
[00:03:23] of the being operational control and the movement of traffic
[00:03:26] inward and outward has to some extent been agreed between. Iran,
[00:03:30] but having said that, something that would post to the first speaker,
[00:03:34] I think something which is very important to pinpoint
[00:03:37] of here a is in the fact that yes we do see that both countries at least to some level
[00:03:41] have agreed upon you know exercising this level of control
[00:03:45] where one part wh one country would allow inboundships, the other would allow outbound
[00:03:49] ships, but having said that we also have to remember the fact that this is
[00:03:52] of something which has not been accepted or endorsed by either USA or any other
[00:03:56] international framework so with
[00:03:58] of regards to the latest development. I still feel that there is still a lot of gray area
[00:04:02] even when it comes to resolving the straight of warm issue and then within
[00:04:06] that one issue as well there are so many other issues which have not been talked
[00:04:09] about until unless we get a published account of what both the
[00:04:13] countries have actually
[00:04:14] of agreed upon it will be very difficult to comment for example there have been outstanding
[00:04:18] issues
[00:04:18] of the fees earlier you would remember that Iran was proposing a fees of
[00:04:22] five to 7% and
[00:04:23] then oman was actually putting forward its own figure of 3% and then of course
[00:04:27] there are very important questions of international law to start. with which
[00:04:31] actually mandate a discussion on the very simple fact that can or cannot these
[00:04:35] countries actually impose a mandatory troll and if they can and
[00:04:38] of how exactly can they do just that? moving on, I think there are also very
[00:04:42] important questions of
[00:04:44] you in the event that some kind of an agreement is actually reached with regards to the state
[00:04:48] of momus entire you know issue, how will it actually be
[00:04:52] enforced? will the regional mediators with Pakistan for that matter have
[00:04:56] any kind of influence when it
[00:04:58] of comes to having a monitoring? verifiable kind of
[00:05:01] a you know influence and then of course the issue of hootis is something that
[00:05:05] has you not been touched topon again even if we are aiming
[00:05:08] towards having you know straight of hormos opened and miraculous. he
[00:05:12] does open at some point in time with
[00:05:14] you know hypothetically speaking, even America agreeing to this, what about
[00:05:18] the you know new war front that we see at the huti front, because we've seen
[00:05:21] even hutis actually you know threaten that they would
[00:05:25] also impose some kind of a transit fees and close the babal, so how do you
[00:05:29] go addressing that? with regards to Israel, I think also it is very important to
[00:05:33] know that the most recent statement of Benjamin Neta in Yahoo is something which
[00:05:37] is very concerning because he's gone to the extent of saying that
[00:05:40] regardless the fact that you "president Trump is his great friend in the
[00:05:44] white house, he still would work to protect the Israeli interest with or
[00:05:48] without a deal, so then again we are back the square one. my simple and
[00:05:52] primary concern here would be that even if two countries that Oman and
[00:05:56] Iran are working to you resolve the operational control of
[00:06:00] state of hormones, which at some point was also in its own
[00:06:03] interpretation contested by the United States of America, following which
[00:06:07] there was a fallout, there was a cease fire and so many other violations, would this
[00:06:11] be enough and if it..." is being done, what are the terms and conditions on which is
[00:06:15] it is being done and how do we actually ensure that the issue doesn't get
[00:06:19] reignited and then again of course if you are going to
[00:06:22] you know restore the 14 point original Islamabad memorandum they
[00:06:26] still issues like that the nuclear which you earlier pointed out which have to
[00:06:30] be resolved we have to see whether Iran actually does something about uranium
[00:06:33] enrichment or not which I feel perhaps it might not because it has more
[00:06:37] strategic leverage now as opposed to what it did when the war actually started and then
[00:06:41] whether it would bow down to nuclear inspections and safegards or not,
[00:06:45] which again is something that Iran has resisted. Lastly, I think one thing which is
[00:06:49] extremely extremely important which I would want to quickly touch upon is the fact that overall
[00:06:53] mining we also seen just yesterday that you people like
[00:06:57] Abdul Said winning the democratic seat and for you being a
[00:07:01] contestant against a primary person republican in the upcoming m terms
[00:07:05] and then people right Rashid Talib being
[00:07:08] you know winning I think they also show a very important discourse in the American
[00:07:11] politics that to way ahead the midterms, because
[00:07:14] this clearly shows that American people, they are looking for change and
[00:07:18] they want that change and that change also include includes
[00:07:22] opposing wars like that of US and Iran, so I think this is also
[00:07:25] something that we need to discuss with regards to the changing development
[00:07:29] right, ladies and gentlemen, this is about the changing developing
[00:07:32] situations every single day, the most conflicted geopolitical
[00:07:36] tension of this era, of course US and Iran, latest developments
[00:07:40] happening every day for now, now now we are seeing uh some diplomatic efforts
[00:07:44] happening behind closed doors, but at the same time there's a lot of
[00:07:48] you know posturing masculine rhetoric coming from both sides.
[00:07:51] ground reality seems very different because the stock ammunitions are
[00:07:55] reducing from the American side as well as the economy of Iran is
[00:07:59] really going southward so there is need for vision and
[00:08:02] leadership and of course peace that we are all hoping
[00:08:14] foreign soil, this is nothing new, this has been in international
[00:08:17] debates since quite a few years now, the time the matter gain
[00:08:21] global attention when US and Canadian site publicly
[00:08:25] linked Indian officials to plot targeting seek
[00:08:29] separatis, this time
[00:08:30] it is about monindar Singh, the UN rights experts have urged
[00:08:34] Canada to take all possible measures in order to save his life, we've been joined by
[00:08:38] Sardar Ramesh Singh Arora, provincial minister
[00:08:53] question, when it comes to Indian state sponsored
[00:08:56] activities outside its borders or you know
[00:09:00] soil, what is your take on the latest development of Mr.
[00:09:04] Manindar Singh whose life seems to be in
[00:09:11] there are series of... happened by the
[00:09:13] Indian agencies, Indian
[00:09:16] diplomats, Indian security
[00:09:19] agencies, so what happened, what happened
[00:09:22] in in Pakistan, one happened
[00:09:25] in Canada, and the series of events happened
[00:09:29] in in the Europe, Canada,
[00:09:32] UK as well as some news heard that they
[00:09:36] targeting one of prominent sick leader in the United
[00:09:48] indian present government modi sarkar
[00:09:52] is always pursuing only one line
[00:09:55] agenda and that one line agenda is
[00:09:58] hindutva and modi is following
[00:10:01] RSS Banjragdal and shifsana's policy which policy is
[00:10:05] just to promote Hindutwa and nowadays if you look at
[00:10:09] India's policy and whatever has happened with the
[00:10:12] minorities, either they are sick, they are muslim, they are
[00:10:16] dar, they are christian, everyone is crying,
[00:10:20] what happened in 1984 with the six, there was a great six
[00:10:23] genocide. what happened with the Kashmiri Muslims,
[00:10:27] what happened with the dalits and look at the Christianity, what
[00:10:31] happened with them, so India who always
[00:10:35] blame Pakistan, always say that in Pakistan
[00:10:39] there are no minority rights in Pakistan, there are no human rights,
[00:10:43] but in actual when we look at whatever has been done
[00:10:46] by the India, it shows that either it's
[00:10:50] attack on akal tak sab, either it there
[00:10:53] is attack and genocide of Muslims, either attack
[00:10:57] on Dalit, either attack on Christian, it is
[00:11:01] always by the state, so it means all these
[00:11:04] incident happened and states supported them,
[00:11:08] and when it comes to Pakistan, yes, some incident
[00:11:11] happens, but there is no involvement of state, there are some
[00:11:15] individuals incidents, whatsoever
[00:11:19] has done, but there is resolve for the government side that the
[00:11:23] government would support always the... minorities in
[00:11:25] Pakistan, so I totally the view
[00:11:29] that whatever is happening, it is coming from the Indian
[00:11:33] state, and now it is the duty of and it is the role
[00:11:36] the international human rights organization,
[00:11:40] human right defenders and they should come forward and they should play their
[00:11:44] role and ask the Indian government why the
[00:11:48] minorities are not protected, why the minorities
[00:11:52] are not safe in India and why they
[00:11:54] are all
[00:11:55] they always cry, why they always say that we there is
[00:11:59] a sikh genocide, there's a muslim genocide, it means
[00:12:02] India policy is not supporting the India, the
[00:12:06] minorities, see in 2019 Pakistan
[00:12:10] gave gift to the Sikh nation in the form
[00:12:14] of Kartarpur corridor, now what exactly the Kartarpur corridor
[00:12:18] is, kartarpur corridor is a place where the
[00:12:21] Indian dies Indian sich and as well as the...
[00:12:25] diaspora who come to India, they want to come to
[00:12:29] kartarpur, but from Indian side they never allowed. In
[00:12:32] 2019 government of Pakistan decided to open the Kartarpur
[00:12:36] corridor and give a chance to the Indian yatris as well
[00:12:40] as the sick diaspora to come to Pakistan, and there was a
[00:12:43] science document with between India and Pakistan that
[00:12:47] 5000 devotees can come to Pakistan every
[00:12:50] day, but look at the number, what exactly is, what
[00:12:54] exactly? India is doing, they don't
[00:12:57] allow their own citizens to come to
[00:13:01] to come to the Kartarpur during last four to five
[00:13:04] years when the Kartarpur corridor was opened, the maximum
[00:13:08] number coming from India to
[00:13:12] Pakistan is not more than 400, so it means there is
[00:13:16] science document between Pakistan, India that
[00:13:19] 5000 can come, but India don't allow their
[00:13:22] own citizens to come to. Pakistan more than
[00:13:25] 400, so when you must be
[00:13:29] remembering because you are from the media and you always cover all of
[00:13:32] those happening, whatever is happening, so
[00:13:36] in on 7th May
[00:13:39] 2025 when the India
[00:13:42] attacked on Pakistan and certainly then Pakistan responded
[00:13:46] and world knows how the how Pakistan responded and
[00:13:49] what exactly Pakistan air force and Pakistan armed forces did with
[00:13:52] India, so on seventh. of by
[00:13:55] 2025 India closed the Kartarpur
[00:13:58] corridor, now it's more than one and a half, one and a half
[00:14:02] year, the Kartarpur corridor is closed from the Indian
[00:14:06] side, they don't allow Indian yatris to come to
[00:14:09] Pakistan, how come India claim that there is a freedom of
[00:14:30] let me bring your attention to the the state
[00:14:34] sponsored terrorism, state sponsored activities that are conducted by India, just
[00:14:37] not the Canadian and US, if you remember
[00:14:40] there was a youth from Bangladesh, Usman Hadi, and there were reports that
[00:14:44] were signal signaling again towards the Indian site, so my question
[00:14:48] is where does this actually place India on the global standings when it
[00:14:52] comes to the diplomatic credibility, what credibility?
[00:14:56] has it left with India? see, today I had
[00:15:00] a meeting with one of your parliament member, he is a visit to
[00:15:04] Pakistan nowadays, this is what I discussed with him. see,
[00:15:07] Pakistan has learned a lot during last two decades and
[00:15:11] now this human rights situation, particularly the minority rights in
[00:15:15] Pakistan, there's slight, there's an improvement and gradual
[00:15:18] improvement and we are making sure that the minorities living in Pakistan, they
[00:15:22] are being taken care the, their rights are protected. they do have freedom of
[00:15:26] religion, they do have, they do can do their rituals in in
[00:15:29] their whatever their faith, whatever the religion is according to their own faith and
[00:15:33] religion, but unfortunately if we look at the standing of India
[00:15:37] "it is going down with every passing day, because when the
[00:15:41] president government of Modi Sarkar, he always talks about
[00:15:45] the Hinditvata, Hinditwa, he always talks about
[00:15:49] that minorities are being considered as third
[00:15:53] class citizen, so certainly in the world is watching them, and
[00:15:56] this is there is why we always appeal to
[00:16:00] the not only the United Nation to all the human rights defenders, look what
[00:16:04] exactly India is doing like there" target
[00:16:08] killing the six worldwide,
[00:16:10] it is, it is in front of everyone, not me, not you, not the Pakistani media, this is coming
[00:16:14] from the Canadian media, this is coming from the prime minister of Canada who
[00:16:18] stood in the parliament and clearly blamed India that
[00:16:22] India has targeted one of his citizen in Canada and the assassinated
[00:16:25] and
[00:16:26] so what does it mean in the world is watching as certainly one
[00:16:30] such sort of incidents are happing the standing of global standing of
[00:16:33] India, I, not me, the world is...
[00:16:37] going down and if the the secular people who who who
[00:16:41] believe on the secularism in India, they don't come forward, don't play the
[00:16:45] role, certainly the time would come when India would be blamed and India would be
[00:16:49] known one the terrorist country and one the country where the
[00:16:53] minorities are not protected, not safe. Mr. Aurora,
[00:16:56] one the core principles when it comes to international relations is respecting the
[00:17:00] sovereignty the other country, you
[00:17:02] can you cannot just
[00:17:03] you know operate or do any kind of operation on the host country without it.
[00:17:07] consent so it is of course viewed as huge breach
[00:17:11] of international norms, how would you look at it from an Indian from from a
[00:17:15] Pakistani perspective or world point of view the way India is
[00:17:19] acting? it is, it is, it is something they always
[00:17:23] what what they do, they always breach those contracts, so either
[00:17:26] it's it's a contract signed between India and Pakistan, indus water treaty,
[00:17:30] how the deal, there is always he threatening Pakistan that we will
[00:17:34] not accept this treaty and we will discard it, so... do not respect any
[00:17:38] international law and what happened on 7th May when they
[00:17:42] blame Pakistan and they said that whatever has happened
[00:17:45] in in the palgam they blamed Pakistan but I appreciate my prime
[00:17:49] minister I appreciate my field marshall I appreciate my defense
[00:17:53] minister as well as the for minister the said okay go for the independent
[00:17:57] investigation if you go for the independent investigation we will join
[00:18:01] you you give us a proof that this is something which is done by the Pakistan so we
[00:18:05] will admit it if you come with the independent judicial. your independent
[00:18:08] inquiry, but they were just blaming the Pakistan and
[00:18:11] after that they attacked Pakistan, but this is the park force, the park armed
[00:18:15] forces and the entire nation
[00:18:19] was supporting the park armed force, park army, the air
[00:18:23] force as well as the navy and we responded well and then you
[00:18:27] know what happened, they were crying and crying reaching
[00:18:31] Washington DC and appealing to requesting
[00:18:34] to Mr. President of America. that please save guard us from
[00:18:38] Pakistan, so this is how the the India, India is
[00:18:42] playing this dirty game, attacking not only Pakistan
[00:18:46] attacking his neighbor countries to see what exactly, what
[00:18:50] exactly is happening with India, this
[00:18:51] is just because their this Hindit approach, there
[00:18:54] is look at the relationship with Bangladesh, look at their
[00:18:58] relationship with China, when it comes to states responsibility or to
[00:19:02] protect the national security or it obligation to follow or
[00:19:06] respect international. "I think
[00:19:09] every nation should follow the international law when it comes to human
[00:19:13] dignity or protection of the people, so Pakistan
[00:19:17] strongly follows it, and that's why if you look
[00:19:21] at the standing of Pakistan, it's increasing day by day and
[00:19:24] internationally, the repute of Pakistan, the standard of Pakistan, and when
[00:19:28] it comes to the president of America, they always
[00:19:32] appreciate the Pakistan, the prime minister of Pakistan, the field
[00:19:35] marshall and I strongly..." when you when
[00:19:39] you respect the in human dignity, when you respect the
[00:19:43] security and when you respect the territorial, you
[00:19:47] can say respect for other countries, so certainly
[00:19:51] your studying will go better and now India is day
[00:19:55] by day internationally there is a decline in their
[00:19:59] respect. Mr. Ara, how has these developments
[00:20:03] impacted the sik diaspora in maybe US or Canada or
[00:20:06] anywhere? any other region across the
[00:20:09] world, see,
[00:20:13] you must witnessed what happened on 7th May
[00:20:17] 2026, all of those sick
[00:20:20] diaspora who originally belong to India,
[00:20:24] they didn't support India at that time, they supported Pakistan
[00:20:28] because they do, Pakistan always talk about
[00:20:32] peace, Pakistan always talk about the
[00:20:35] hemodites, always Pakistan always... talk about the freedom of
[00:20:38] religion, pakistan always talk about about that the
[00:20:42] territorial integrity should be considered, that's why in
[00:20:46] May 2026 the six diaspora sup
[00:20:50] voted the narrative of Pakistan, which was the narrative of
[00:20:53] peace, so let tell you, unfortunately the
[00:20:57] Indian media, the goti media and particularly the Indian establishment, the
[00:21:01] Indian agency, they are playing very dirty game against Pakistan, they
[00:21:05] have they have hired pr firms, they have hired
[00:21:08] influencers, they have hired media houses who
[00:21:11] always spread misinformation who
[00:21:14] always propagate a negative agenda Pakistan because they do have their
[00:21:18] westted interest against. Pakistan and they always try to
[00:21:22] pollute the minds the sick diaspora living either in the west or the far
[00:21:26] east or in the central asia and
[00:21:29] recently I was in the United States, I was in Malaysia,
[00:21:33] Indonesia and Australia so I visited all
[00:21:36] of those places and met with my sick community, sick diaspora, I requested
[00:21:40] them and I told them, see at this time the chief
[00:21:44] minister of punjab, she is committed, she is passionate and she
[00:21:47] always says that minorities. are my pride and she is
[00:21:51] inviting the sick diaspora to come to Pakistan and be
[00:21:55] attached with your heritage because Pakistan is the first homeland for
[00:21:59] the sikh because the or the originality the
[00:22:03] origin the Sikh faith is from Pakistan the first Sikh master the first
[00:22:06] Sikh Guru Guru Nanak Dev ji his birth place is in Pakistan
[00:22:10] his resting place is in Kartarpur so we invite all six
[00:22:14] diaspora to come to Pakistan but unfortunately what
[00:22:17] exactly the Indian embassies. in different parts
[00:22:21] the world, wherever they are, they always propagate negative
[00:22:25] agenda Pakistan, they always spread this information, don't go to
[00:22:29] Pakistan, so they always stop them. Let tell you the real case
[00:22:32] example, when I was in one the country of
[00:22:36] Europe, before I arrive a gurdwara, the Indian
[00:22:40] embassy stopped the sikh community, there
[00:22:44] in that country, they don't allow Mr. Arora to come and speak in your
[00:22:48] Gurdwara because he is coming all the way. from Pakistan and when he come to
[00:22:52] coming to your Guudwara and talking high about Pakistan, so whatever we have done
[00:22:56] so far to to to to to like create a
[00:23:00] bad name for Pakistan, it will be counted by
[00:23:23] very quick closing comments from both of you, as far as the
[00:23:26] situation with the westerners is concerned, we saw Justin Trudo
[00:23:30] standing on the floor the house giving very clear statement in
[00:23:34] categorical terms that there was a connection with those agents who
[00:23:38] found in that assassination of Hardeep Singh Nija
[00:23:42] with the Indian government and he took a stand, we saw the
[00:23:46] relationship bilaterally between Canada and India.
[00:23:50] saw it considerably actually nose dived at that particular point, there was a drastic
[00:23:53] shift, we also saw the endorsement of that particular stance taken by Justin Trudo
[00:23:57] at that time by five eyes, but later on there was a
[00:24:01] change the leadership in Canada, so we
[00:24:04] saw Mark Karne, the new prime the incoming prime minister of Canada making
[00:24:08] a visit to India, and this particular case of
[00:24:12] Maninder Singh that you discussing right now, the threats to his life
[00:24:16] happened on the eve of that particular visit marka. he was making
[00:24:20] towards India, so looking at that particular time when Justin
[00:24:24] Truude was at the helm of affairs, it was clear a
[00:24:27] categorical stance, but I think there was some sort
[00:24:31] of, I mean the the entire issue was
[00:24:35] downplayed considerably when there was a change of leadership, having said that one last
[00:24:38] point when we talk about the United States of America, there was an assassination
[00:24:42] attempt on that particular front also, we have also seen at
[00:24:46] the same time there is deterioration the relationship by literally between
[00:24:50] the US and Canada also under Mark, so until unless
[00:24:54] there isn't any collective approach by these western
[00:24:58] countries towards India, then India is not going to
[00:25:02] abide by any sort of provisions or the norms the international law
[00:25:05] or whatever, that is one last point, because president Donald
[00:25:09] Trump also doesn't seem to be serious on that particular front, having that proof that
[00:25:13] there was an assassination attempt made on the US soil, he
[00:25:17] just deteriorated his bilateral relations. ship with India
[00:25:21] not on the basis of this human right issue or this violation of
[00:25:24] sovereignty, the violation of international law, but on the basis
[00:25:28] the trade, I think the priorities for the
[00:25:37] important, is the fact that when we talk about this, I think mahin a very
[00:25:41] important international law angle is often missed, we have
[00:25:45] to see that the ICJ has made not one rather various judgments, I remember the
[00:25:49] case of Nekargua. back in the 1980s and then of course DRC versus
[00:25:53] Congo where it was very clearly said that no state can either
[00:25:56] support or inside any kind of violence by promoting
[00:26:00] terrorism by supporting proxy groups by
[00:26:02] the way would also by virtue of that include countries like Pakistan because when we
[00:26:06] are talking about transnational repression it would just not be countries like Canada in
[00:26:10] US but a
[00:26:11] also different from
[00:26:12] you know supporting terrorism here in Pakistan to
[00:26:14] so the only problem here is practically speaking that
[00:26:18] unfortunately India cannot be taken to the ICJ because
[00:26:21] legally India the way India is ratified you know various treaties
[00:26:25] it has actually kept a legal exemption which actually shows the structural
[00:26:29] limitations of
[00:26:31] you know international courts like I CJ as well and this is despite the fact that
[00:26:34] UN, India is a founding member the UN, it has ratified
[00:26:38] not one other various country treaties which actually stop it from committing
[00:26:42] such transnational crimes that to particularly religiously
[00:26:46] motivated and motivated towards religious minority, so as of course an
[00:26:50] advocate of international law, I think here we definitely do need some
[00:26:53] serious kind of changes in our UN of course top tier
[00:26:57] systems and then of course perhaps do away with the voting system with
[00:27:01] Pakistan's. perminent representative has also rightly so pointed
[00:27:05] towards that
[00:27:06] you know powerful nations get away with so many atrocities just because
[00:27:10] the p5 they do not let important united nation resolutions
[00:27:14] get passed against them so I think and overall of international law and of
[00:27:18] course enforcebility the system is very important to hold India accountable
[00:27:27] has actually isolated in global front as well but it is high
[00:27:31] time
[00:27:31] that the global community national community should really step in and step in
[00:27:35] and hold
[00:27:39] TV.