PAKISTANTV — broadcast
20260920 233000 UTC
502 transcript segments
Google Speech-to-Text API Automatic Transcription (Chirp)
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:01] we have to keep in mind certain structural
[00:00:03] issues, um, there may be
[00:00:06] significant agreements announced on the
[00:00:08] in margins
[00:00:09] of the UN general assembly meeting,
[00:00:13] there may not be, there may be very important discussions that take
[00:00:17] place that initiate processes that only result in
[00:00:21] significant announcements
[00:00:22] in of progress, weeks or months later, so we won't see them
[00:00:26] of this week, at the same time, there are going to be "there are
[00:00:30] negative headlines that have already been pre-written in newsrooms around the
[00:00:34] world, there are going to be stories about about President
[00:00:37] She
[00:00:38] of choosing to skip this event, although he's just
[00:00:42] 200 miles down the road in in Washington and
[00:00:46] could very easily attend and and give address. um, there are
[00:00:50] certainly going to be stories about President
[00:00:53] Trump's presentation, whatever that may be, but I'm guessing
[00:00:57] that that is not going to be good news for the..." UN um,
[00:01:01] but at the same time, to the extent that there's there's positive
[00:01:05] progress,
[00:01:05] in we may not see it immediately this week. On
[00:01:09] AI, um, I'm very
[00:01:11] skeptical that significant progress can be reached in
[00:01:15] light
[00:01:16] of of the the very extreme and erratic public
[00:01:20] of position that's been taken over the past week by the president
[00:01:24] of the United States opposing virtually any
[00:01:27] sort of guard rails on the text. analogy,
[00:01:31] but again, I'm I'm prepared to be positively
[00:01:34] surprised,
[00:01:38] in but let me go to Stephanie and I'll come back to you. Stephanie, with the
[00:01:41] UN facing questions, do you think that there is
[00:01:44] space for other bodies, for
[00:01:47] example,
[00:01:49] you know,
[00:01:49] or or you know space for for perhaps something to
[00:01:53] replace, a
[00:01:56] you more know, effective,
[00:01:57] or let become me, let me phrase it that way, a more effective sort
[00:02:00] of body because we are looking at you know so many issues
[00:02:04] at this time, so many conflicts at this time, and
[00:02:07] you know where of course we are looking at students of law, questioning
[00:02:11] might is right, questioning whether there's any real role for international
[00:02:15] a law or these kind of systems, if I can say
[00:02:19] that, do you think that there is space for something
[00:02:23] else, perhaps to to
[00:02:26] a to of you, body that can become more effective, have better...
[00:02:30] schools
[00:02:30] a have better systems, do you think that what are your thoughts on
[00:02:34] that? i think it's a very important
[00:02:37] question,
[00:02:38] in because it is tendency that we're already seeing, so
[00:02:42] we are seeing countries prioritizing like
[00:02:46] minded venues that might have
[00:02:49] of a smaller membership, but that might be easier to
[00:02:53] navigate for them when
[00:02:55] a it come to multilateralism. the problem with that is
[00:02:58] that the united nation is the only venue that
[00:03:02] really has this convening powers of 193
[00:03:06] countries, so as much as the United Nations has its flaws
[00:03:10] and it we are seeing that there is lot that it's
[00:03:14] unable to do a lot of crisis, and we've even seen other
[00:03:17] of platforms being more successful than the UN at solving
[00:03:21] of some issues, the UN remains the only place
[00:03:25] where diplomats from all over the world can meet,
[00:03:28] and so for example,
[00:03:30] a "there's a tendency, experts have been saying that
[00:03:34] leaders from India, for example, China, they they
[00:03:37] appear content with what they they've achieved at the Bricks meeting,
[00:03:41] so
[00:03:42] of maybe that is why they're not attending the UN general assembly
[00:03:45] of at the highest level, um, and that is fair,
[00:03:49] maybe that is tendency that we're seeing, but that being
[00:03:52] said, on some other issues, even if they're not there
[00:03:56] at the
[00:03:57] of higher level, that doesn't mean that the meetings that these - representatives
[00:04:01] are taking, they're not achieve, they're not achieving
[00:04:04] on important topics, they're not being successful, so
[00:04:08] I think the UN is
[00:04:10] has has that convening power on so much more than just peace and
[00:04:14] security, if we're talking about climate, if we're talking about space, if we're talking
[00:04:17] about again AI, um, so ultimately, while
[00:04:21] the UN is failing um on peace and
[00:04:25] security, um, it is still a
[00:04:28] of venue that has an offering that is unique
[00:04:31] diplomatically. Right, thank you, thank you for being with us,
[00:04:35] of Stephanie, of
[00:04:35] a
[00:04:35] of thank you for your very valuable input. Paul, when
[00:04:39] at European and
[00:04:41] a Geneva based diplomatic perspective, what role can
[00:04:45] countries that are not directly party to these
[00:04:48] in conflicts play in
[00:04:51] of facilitating dialogue and deescalation under the umbrella for example of even
[00:04:55] the UN, well countries who are not
[00:04:59] party to... conflicts often play an essential role
[00:05:03] in trying to promote dialogue, conflict
[00:05:06] resolution and reconciliation, we've seen this in
[00:05:10] the case
[00:05:11] of the conflict between
[00:05:12] the United states and and Iran, um, we've
[00:05:15] seen Oman play a role prior to the conflict in in
[00:05:19] trying to facilitate a nuclear agreement, we've seen Pakistan play a
[00:05:22] role in trying to broker cease
[00:05:26] fire and and a lasting peace deal, but very
[00:05:30] often um countries that are
[00:05:33] are not directly involved um can serve as honest brokers
[00:05:37] and and can uh provide forum and and facilitate
[00:05:41] dialogue. fair enough, let me also
[00:05:45] include Alan Ayer, who is the distinguished
[00:05:48] diplomatic fellow middle east institute, former state department, senior
[00:05:52] policy maker joining us, and from a
[00:05:56] former US policy makers perspective,
[00:06:00] what can UN diplomacy realistically accomplish in your
[00:06:03] opinion, when we're looking at Washington and other major
[00:06:07] powers, for example have competing strategic
[00:06:10] interests. Well, normally UN general
[00:06:14] assemblies can potentially accomplish lot. I think
[00:06:18] this time with this in US administration, probably lot
[00:06:22] less, because this US administration is not used to,
[00:06:26] nor particularly good at uh doing diplomacy and
[00:06:29] multilateral fora, it prefers bilateral
[00:06:32] relations, but in terms of conflicting national
[00:06:35] interests, um, in this case, pretty much
[00:06:39] the whole world is unified. that this war
[00:06:43] needs to stop, so competing national
[00:06:47] interest is not as prominent in the case of trying to find
[00:06:51] a way to end this Iran war so that the straight
[00:06:55] of hormos and the babal mandab are fully
[00:06:58] open. Right, fair enough, let me let me go
[00:07:02] to Paul and then I'll come back to you. Paul, do you agree with
[00:07:06] what allen is saying, when we look at you,
[00:07:10] overall the kind of response. that you of course we would
[00:07:14] like the kind of effectiveness as we earlier spoke we would like, but when we look
[00:07:18] at UN realistically accomplishing anything, do you
[00:07:22] think that there is, what is it going to take for the
[00:07:25] US and other other powers to turn to middle east for
[00:07:29] example and you know move towards
[00:07:32] deescalation? well, I think that's a key
[00:07:35] question, and I think again, we have to
[00:07:39] distinguish between what can be accomplished at the UN. GA and
[00:07:43] what can be accomplished by the UNGA? I think the
[00:07:47] forum is there, the right actors are there to engage in
[00:07:50] dialogue on the margins, but ultimately the question
[00:07:54] is always going to be whether the United States and Iran um
[00:07:58] can come to some sort of mutual
[00:08:01] understanding that results an end to this
[00:08:04] conflict. um, we thought we were
[00:08:08] close to that with the Islamabad memorandum of understanding
[00:08:12] that... brokered by Pakistan, but it turned out that the two
[00:08:15] sides um had fundamentally different understandings of what they had
[00:08:18] agreed to uh so um in some respects we're
[00:08:22] farther apart now than we were then, but uh
[00:08:26] certainly the general assembly uh
[00:08:29] provides uh a good forum where
[00:08:33] um enough the key players are there uh that this
[00:08:37] there can be attempt to push dialogue
[00:08:39] forward right let me come back to
[00:08:43] um, Mr. Are looking back at the intense
[00:08:47] geopolitical gridlock between Washington and
[00:08:50] Tehran, um, that that leading up to
[00:08:53] 2010, long before of course a formalized
[00:08:57] digital, negotiated framework was even on the
[00:09:00] table, how can diplomacy realistically serve,
[00:09:04] do you think it can serve at all as a
[00:09:07] you know primary vehicle for this kind of a strategic breakthrough, because there's a
[00:09:10] host of history. "and
[00:09:13] you know, in in and and of course it's a deeply rooted
[00:09:16] conflict. well, what I always say is not
[00:09:20] everything can be solved with diplomacy, but nothing can be solved
[00:09:24] without it. it's not a magic wand. for example, at this
[00:09:27] point, I think given what's happened in the last year and a half,
[00:09:31] it's going to be very hard, even for a US
[00:09:34] administration, which is good at diplomacy, which this administration
[00:09:38] is not, to use diplomacy to find a solution."
[00:09:42] It's too late for that, had it started earlier with more
[00:09:46] vigor in seeking diplomatic solution with Iran, that
[00:09:50] might not have been the case, so as I said, diplomacy is
[00:09:54] limited at this point, I think the president
[00:09:58] Trump and the US administration will be a listening
[00:10:01] mode, and I think it's up to the rest the world to include and perhaps
[00:10:05] especially the countries in the region, the
[00:10:09] GCC countries to find a way to stop the...
[00:10:25] will either say yes or no, how
[00:10:28] should the international community really approach the Gaza question if
[00:10:32] the objective is a durable political
[00:10:36] settlement of course rather than any kind of a temporary
[00:10:39] pause? the Gaza problem is not soluble,
[00:10:43] it's again you talk about it being too late, the first step
[00:10:47] any attempt to to put bandade
[00:10:51] on the massive strategic mess that is gaz.
[00:10:55] is to get Israel to stand down and back off, not just in
[00:10:58] Gaza, but in the west bank, and this US
[00:11:02] administration isn't going to do that, so
[00:11:05] we'll have to wait until the elections happen in Israel, I
[00:11:09] assume whoever wins in the as prime minister
[00:11:13] will by and large continue the same
[00:11:16] policies, but absent US pressure on
[00:11:19] Gaza, nothing is going to change for the better, I
[00:11:23] mean US pressure on Israel. "nothing is going to change for the better, pardon
[00:11:26] me. Paul to agree with what
[00:11:30] uh, Allan is saying, is it as
[00:11:34] as mystic, I mean, of course, or or is this the only
[00:11:38] realistic view to take at this time? I, I do
[00:11:42] agree very much so, and particularly in light the fact that the
[00:11:46] Gaza problem is no longer just a Gaza problem, it's a West Bank problem,
[00:11:50] it's a southern Lebanon problem, um, and in the
[00:11:53] run up to..." Israeli elections next month, I don't
[00:11:57] think that there's much prospect for compromise coming from
[00:12:01] the Israeli side. So I think these are
[00:12:05] issues that are going to be very much still with
[00:12:09] us after the Israeli elections after the US elections in
[00:12:12] November. Fair enough. Thank you so much
[00:12:16] Paul, thank you for joining
[00:12:17] us. Alan, what
[00:12:21] are the principal obstacles to reviving a credible?
[00:12:25] two state political pathway at this
[00:12:28] stage? well, one problem: israel, Israel has
[00:12:32] given up on the two state solution, it was traumatized by
[00:12:36] October 7th, much like the US was after
[00:12:38] 9/11 and is now bent on on destroying whatever
[00:12:42] it sees is opposition, and unfortunately that includes
[00:12:46] Palestinians and West Bank and Gaza, so the two state
[00:12:49] solution, I don't even know if the US administration has used
[00:12:53] that phrase, this current. US administration,
[00:12:57] so the two state solution was something that people
[00:13:01] talked about in the US, though they really didn't believe it,
[00:13:05] and at this point, given that so few people actually believe it's
[00:13:08] possible, given current Israeli politics,
[00:13:12] I don't think, I
[00:13:12] mean it's certainly not a staple the US regional
[00:13:16] policy at this point, but can
[00:13:20] UN even play a meaningful role in your opinion or or do you think
[00:13:24] that, as far as as stabilization,
[00:13:27] reconstruction is concerned, or or that, like you also
[00:13:31] said that ultimately it will depend on the major powers and of
[00:13:35] course the regional states also. I think the UN
[00:13:39] can play a role in the sense that the United States in the last
[00:13:43] couple of years has forfitted its desire,
[00:13:47] given up its desire to work collaboratively with
[00:13:50] traditional allies and multilateral fora, and so US
[00:13:54] global... leadership is absent, and even worse, it's
[00:13:58] inconsistency, this administration
[00:14:01] sides with Russia, with China has turned its back on
[00:14:05] traditional allies such as NATO, so I think
[00:14:08] unfortunately, the rest the global community is
[00:14:12] trying to envision a world where they cannot look to the
[00:14:15] US for responsible, stable,
[00:14:19] sustained leadership, it's a transitional phase, and
[00:14:23] so I think places like the U.S. where world leaders can get
[00:14:26] together and try to find a new, different and better path
[00:14:30] forward, seems to be the option, and in the US
[00:14:34] case again, this administration has taken
[00:14:37] this principle of America first and made it
[00:14:41] America alone, and that's not going to work for the US or for the
[00:14:45] world. when you
[00:14:48] look at, you mentioned this
[00:14:51] administration, the current administration the US, do you think that? "you no,
[00:14:55] this is perhaps unique to this
[00:14:57] administration and and things may change in the
[00:15:01] future when we look at you know how the US
[00:15:05] reacts or or chooses to take
[00:15:08] part in the UN, considering that
[00:15:12] you know we've seen a lot of lot more
[00:15:15] perhaps you know blatant remarks come like
[00:15:19] you said also at times there is lot of
[00:15:23] erratic commentary also. so so you know in that
[00:15:26] sense you think that that is a temporary phase possibly?
[00:15:30] well things always changed and certainly this administration is unique,
[00:15:34] you know what I've said is
[00:15:36] not a partisan comment, "I worked in the government for 40 years for Republicans and
[00:15:40] Democrats. All previous
[00:15:42] administrations believed in diplomacy,
[00:15:45] believed in furthering the national interest in a collaborative manner, cooperative
[00:15:49] manner with our allies. Um, this one
[00:15:52] doesn't, and will that change? One would hope so, I as a
[00:15:56] US citizen hope so, but whatever happens
[00:16:00] in the next administration, whatever happens in the
[00:16:04] midterms, what this administration has shown..." is
[00:16:08] that America can do things like
[00:16:11] this, can go sideways, can go off the rails, can adapt
[00:16:15] a totally new foreign policy, 180
[00:16:19] degrees opposed to previous administrations, so
[00:16:23] that essence of us
[00:16:26] stability throughout administrations has been
[00:16:30] sundered, has been broken, so yeah, things can get better with
[00:16:33] subsequent administrations, but this administration has
[00:16:37] committed what, many have called superpower
[00:16:40] suicide, and that's going to be hard to undo in terms
[00:16:44] of getting back to where we were before, but we can indefinitely
[00:16:48] improve the situation over the way
[00:16:50] it is now.
[00:16:52] so so if if like you to use your word, superpower
[00:16:55] suicide, do you think that there is there is a way back in the sense that you think there
[00:16:59] is going to be some kind of a calculated move
[00:17:03] towards sort of checking superpowers in the future?
[00:17:07] future there can be, you think mechanisms, you
[00:17:11] think
[00:17:11] that there is at least some kind of talk about divising these kind
[00:17:15] of mechanisms possibly? i don't think so.
[00:17:18] international law is almost an oxy mororon, it's much
[00:17:22] weaker now that it was years ago. i think that we're not going to get
[00:17:26] back to the way it was before this administration. this
[00:17:29] administration has essentially broken a complex
[00:17:33] system in the middle east with the Iran war and in terms.
[00:17:37] the US alliances, and though, as I've said, things can get
[00:17:41] better, and one hopes they will, you can't go back to the
[00:17:45] way it was before. Now, if you're asking, will new
[00:17:48] regional and international alliances get
[00:17:52] stronger as result of this administration? I think so, we're
[00:17:55] already seeing it. You know, will the situation in the Middle
[00:17:59] East, where our Gulf allies realized that the US
[00:18:02] security umbrella has holes in it, will that change? It
[00:18:06] already has. as result of this war, so things
[00:18:10] can get better, they just can't return to where they were before
[00:18:14] February 28th, and a larger sense before the
[00:18:18] events of October 7th, 2023, with the terrorist Hamas
[00:18:22] attack and Israel's response, which
[00:18:26] destabilized, ongoing response, destabilized the whole
[00:18:28] region. As far as the interests of for example,
[00:18:32] Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states are concerned, where do they intersect with
[00:18:36] Washington's? approach to regional
[00:18:39] deescalation? i think obviously the
[00:18:43] GCC countries to include the kingdom and the Emirates didn't want this war
[00:18:47] to happen, once it started, they were hopeful that since the US
[00:18:51] had started this, they could finish it and get rid the
[00:18:55] threat, the regional threat, the very real regional threat that
[00:18:59] Iran poses to the GCC countries and to
[00:19:02] Israel, but I think it's clear now to the Saudis and to
[00:19:05] others that the U.S. cannot
[00:19:09] engage in regime change and bring about a more
[00:19:13] benign, more user-friendly Iranian regime, nor can
[00:19:17] it defang or or get rid the threat that
[00:19:20] Iran poses. I think the best possible case right now
[00:19:24] for the region is that the straight of hormose be reopened as
[00:19:28] much as possible, as quickly as possible, because not just the
[00:19:32] constrained straight of hormos, but also the boble mandad is causing
[00:19:36] serious economic and...
[00:20:07] because it's not their products that are being bottled up and can
[00:20:10] either go out the straight or go out the boble
[00:20:13] mandab, but in terms of diplomatic
[00:20:17] channels, could they realistically reduce tensions
[00:20:21] between when we look at Iran and the US, I mean I know
[00:20:24] that countries like Pakistan also and other countries have tried and we've
[00:20:28] seen the mediatory efforts, we've seen a lot of back door diplomacy, but what
[00:20:32] are your thoughts on the success of that kind of
[00:20:36] diplomacy? I know you've mentioned what your thoughts on
[00:20:40] generally diplomatic uh the success of diplomatic
[00:20:44] efforts is, but at this point when we see the kind of commentary that
[00:20:48] happens between the US and Iran "do you think that the chances of getting
[00:20:52] back on the table are still rampant? i think there's
[00:20:56] still a chance. i think that the US administration has a large sense
[00:20:59] outsourced its diplomacy, which would have been traditionally done
[00:21:03] by experienced high-level advisers to the
[00:21:07] president, has outsourced
[00:21:08] it to countries like Pakistan or to Qatar or to the other countries
[00:21:12] in the region, and seeing if they can find a solution, but at the end
[00:21:16] the day, communication is not a problem." "the
[00:21:20] problem is the US has certain red lines, has certain
[00:21:23] minimal demands of Iran, Iran has certain minimal
[00:21:27] demands the United States and there's
[00:21:30] a lot of distance between the two. when we did the nuclear agreement with
[00:21:33] Iran from 2010 to 2015, we were able to find
[00:21:37] an intersection set, something where both sides
[00:21:41] could agree to work within, where Iran accepted constraints
[00:21:45] its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions
[00:21:48] relief." That hasn't happened yet
[00:21:52] with this with Iran and this administration.
[00:21:56] Do you think it's a correct statement to make that the red
[00:21:59] lines, that the US red lines continually
[00:22:02] change, or you know, when we look at of course what the
[00:22:06] president the US has been saying in terms of what the goals
[00:22:10] are, and what they hope to achieve and what it started with,
[00:22:13] as far as Iran is concerned. Well, certainly
[00:22:17] the reasons for starting the war. have changed
[00:22:20] continuously, we might not ever know why the US
[00:22:24] decided
[00:22:25] to attack Iran, certainly it wasn't because Iran was any
[00:22:29] way an imminent threat, but the red lines that the
[00:22:33] US has still seem to be the same,
[00:22:37] which is Iran must not be allowed to enrich
[00:22:40] uranium its own soil, it must export
[00:22:44] all 440 kilograms of its highly enriched
[00:22:47] uranium, now it must reopen the street
[00:22:51] without Iranian administrative control the way it was before February
[00:22:55] 28, those seemed to be the key red lines, so there could be other
[00:22:59] red lines like dismantling its whole nuclear
[00:23:02] program, not supporting proxies, getting rid of
[00:23:06] its missiles even more maximalist, but those
[00:23:10] US red lines, I just mentioned the straight of hormose, no indigenous
[00:23:14] enrichment, getting rid the HEU, the highly enrich eranium, they haven't
[00:23:17] changed since the war started, and Iran still unwilling to
[00:23:21] accept any of those. um,
[00:23:25] just one last question, if we look beyond this year's
[00:23:29] speeches, what concrete diplomatic
[00:23:32] outcomes, are there any that you can expect from the
[00:23:36] UNGA81, and that would convince the international
[00:23:39] community that, perhaps they are closer to reaching
[00:23:43] some kind of resolution on the main conflicts the world is
[00:23:47] at this time facing? well, I think that again as I
[00:23:51] think you this US administration really doesn't put lot of effort
[00:23:55] into these general assemblies much like they used to, not a lot of state department people
[00:23:59] going there. President Trump's speech will mostly be for the domestic US
[00:24:03] audience leading up to the mid-terms, but I think countries like China,
[00:24:06] and there'll be a bilateral summit between the head of China and then President
[00:24:10] Trump later this week, um, they
[00:24:14] can not put pressure, but make
[00:24:17] clear to President Trump and the key people. 'who who go with
[00:24:21] him, the stab, the stakes involved here in
[00:24:25] terms of how bad the US economy is,
[00:24:28] how bad
[00:24:29] the global economy is in terms of loss of resilience and the adverse
[00:24:33] consequences of letting this war drag on, or even
[00:24:36] worse escalating, because we are seeing signs
[00:24:40] that the US might actually escalate militarily in the near future,
[00:24:44] so again, I think if the rest the world are the key
[00:24:48] countries that
[00:24:49] are at least countries president Trump listens
[00:24:53] to, stress this main point, that might be successful
[00:24:57] outcome
[00:25:00] for this. right, thank you so much, thank
[00:25:01] you for joining us, thank you for being with us, it was an absolute pleasure as far as the
[00:25:05] UN is concerned, perhaps it's time to reflect on whether it's
[00:25:09] still important in today's
[00:25:12] landscape of conflicts and can this years UNGA
[00:25:16] actually help resolve major wars and
[00:25:20] difference to the international disputes
[00:25:22] that that face the world faces, the human cost these
[00:25:26] conflicts that the people today
[00:25:31] redundant of of phase, or whether it's it's concept or or perhaps just a
[00:25:34] place of meeting
[00:25:37] and
[00:25:38] you know speeches. thank you so much for joining us today on
[00:25:41] perspective.
[00:26:11] Modi regime is employing strong arm tactics to stifle free
[00:26:15] media in occupied Jammu and Kashmir.
[00:26:19] Journalists in occupied region are harassed and booked in
[00:26:22] fabricated cases for reporting truth. The
[00:26:26] victimization of journalists in occupied Jammu and Kashmir has
[00:26:29] increased manifold since 5th August.
[00:26:32] 2019. Modi regime is using
[00:26:36] notorious agencies like Nia and Sia to raid
[00:26:39] journalists homes in occupied Jammu and
[00:26:42] Kashmir. International community must act to
[00:26:46] protect independent media in occupied Jammu and
[00:26:49] Kashmir.
[00:27:05] good evening and welcome to the school. how is barbarazam supposed to cats a team like that?
[00:27:09] i think personally Barbarazim should look back at himself and look back at him as a
[00:27:13] player and be focusing on how he himself is going to score runs.
[00:27:17] but it shouldn't be a mismatch in the way that it's playing out. i think that's been very
[00:27:20] frustrating to watch on the pitch to see these players we know are capable of
[00:27:24] so much more. razal as a primer example that there's so much raw talent in
[00:27:28] Pakistan. mean you know the way he played the way he's b.
[00:27:32] coming on, suddenly flying into the country, not being used to these conditions, taking
[00:27:36] four wickets, as I was able to carry Pakistan flag for
[00:27:40] almost, yeah 20 years there, and uh hopefully
[00:27:43] inshallah now being the president can see some
[00:27:47] Pakistani representing Pakistan in the near future at the open as well again
[00:27:50] inshallah and we'll show the fans that we are in control and we are making
[00:27:54] big decisions um, but this this is
[00:27:57] this is not a positive thing for Pakistan cricket, it's amazing things
[00:28:00] on and off the beach. shown respect, he has shown
[00:28:04] resilience, he has shown excellence, just for voting
[00:28:08] for him, which is pure corruption at
[00:28:11] the, but it doesn't have to be like this, it have to be more rules into it,
[00:28:15] explain it to ethical matter, leak by arsenal
[00:28:19] through
[00:28:20] michel teta, but again it was luck last season whereby the they
[00:28:23] secured their victory and the tried to change and i
[00:28:27] have
[00:28:28] no more knowledge than referee who's older than me who's supposed to judge my fight, come
[00:28:31] on It's supposed to educate you as well at the same time, exactly, he's supposed to keep me
[00:28:35] safe,
[00:28:42] before the whistle blows, before the final bell, there is the
[00:28:45] conversation, it's a language understood by every
[00:28:49] stadium on every street corner, it's a moment your
[00:28:52] heartbeats with million others,
[00:28:56] it's a roar of crowd, the silence of
[00:28:59] anticipation, it's a trimeful cry. of a
[00:29:02] champion, it's more than a game, it's a
[00:29:06] connection
[00:29:12] speaks to the
[00:29:13] world, before
[00:29:17] the whistle blows, before the final bell, there is the
[00:29:20] conversation, it's a language understood by every
[00:29:24] stadium on every street corner, it's a moment, your
[00:29:27] heartbeats with million others, it's
[00:29:31] a roar of... for crowd, the silence of
[00:29:34] anticipation.
[00:30:07] Hello good morning and welcome to Pakistan TV with the news of this hour, I'm
[00:30:11] Zenab Bukhari, let's have look at the
[00:30:12] headlines.
[00:30:25] Security forces skill eight Indian sponsored Kavarage and hangu
[00:30:29] operation, to officers and four soldiers imprace. shahat
[00:30:33] during intense fire
[00:30:34] exchange.
[00:30:42] World leaders gather in New York this week for the in general assembly
[00:30:46] to discuss the middle east war. Russia, ukraine conflict, artificial intelligence
[00:30:50] and other major clarable issues on the
[00:30:52] agenda.
[00:30:57] Pakistan's un envoy Assim says.