PAKISTANTV — broadcast
20261011 023000 UTC
475 transcript segments
Google Speech-to-Text API Automatic Transcription (Chirp)
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] in the context that the entire international law
[00:00:03] is questioned. I mean, if the president
[00:00:07] of the United States says he does not need international
[00:00:10] law, if you know the
[00:00:13] of entire body
[00:00:15] of of law is not
[00:00:16] of being uphold, you can make sanctions against the ICC
[00:00:20] for ruling on something which is absolutely in their
[00:00:23] duty and and obligation to
[00:00:25] of rule, we are looking a
[00:00:27] of lawless situation, and I think... "that is why I have been
[00:00:31] arguing for the last several years
[00:00:35] of of that we urgently need new international security architecture,
[00:00:39] because international law and the the order, as it
[00:00:42] emerged after the end
[00:00:44] of the cold war, where there was an attempt to establish an
[00:00:47] unilateral dominance of certain
[00:00:51] countries, that clearly is falling apart,
[00:00:55] if you look at the so-called middle east, southwest Asia, the
[00:00:58] entire security..." architecture, as it existed
[00:01:02] before the United States and
[00:01:05] Israel started
[00:01:05] the two wars against Iran, is also
[00:01:08] disintegrating, so for the for southeast Asia
[00:01:12] there is an urgent need to have new security
[00:01:15] of architecture, which you must
[00:01:18] be guaranteeing naturally
[00:01:22] the rights
[00:01:23] of the palestinians a palestinian
[00:01:25] state, it must provide however economic
[00:01:30] development for all countries, because the only name for peace is
[00:01:34] development, so I think that we are
[00:01:36] in a an unbelievable
[00:01:38] of turmol where people have to review that the policies which
[00:01:42] existed up to now clearly have
[00:01:45] failed, the order has fallen apart, the new
[00:01:49] order is not yet there, but I
[00:01:51] think
[00:01:54] the the the everything has to start with the idea that international
[00:01:58] law must be uphold. "this is why
[00:02:01] the UN charter must be respected, the
[00:02:04] of Geneva Convention, the instruments
[00:02:10] of of the UN like of the ICC and the International Court of Justice,
[00:02:11] the they must be respected
[00:02:14] of as absolute authority, because otherwise we are in great
[00:02:18] danger of falling into anarchy on the whole
[00:02:21] of globe. Absolutely. Miss Helga Zepla Rush, founder Shilla
[00:02:28] in in Institute, thank you very much for being with us on this episode of unfolds, we really appreciate you. taking time out sir, coming back to you one last question,
[00:02:32] talk about the diet humanitarian crisis that has been
[00:02:37] of unfolding in Gaza in
[00:02:38] a particular, now we know for fact there haven't
[00:02:42] been
[00:02:42] a ample supplies when it
[00:02:44] of comes to the medicines, also when we talk
[00:02:47] about the lack of access to the clean drinking
[00:02:51] of water, from the very basic communities
[00:02:52] of of life over there, with with the kind of given
[00:02:56] approach on the part
[00:02:58] of the Europeans in the kind of approach. the strategy in the Trump administration
[00:03:01] as well and also how Israelies have been
[00:03:05] going about in order to criticize and also coming hard
[00:03:09] on what the UN UN's policy and its
[00:03:13] subsidiary agencies work in Gaza
[00:03:17] of was concerned. What is the way forward when it comes to
[00:03:20] alleviating the suffering
[00:03:22] of the Gazans amit this entire
[00:03:25] humanitarian crisis? Egypt of
[00:03:28] course has a great role. and that Egypt along with other arab
[00:03:32] countries and
[00:03:33] of Israel of course has been pushing backward
[00:03:36] our all of our efforts to push inward
[00:03:40] the supplies and all the humanitarian aid for our
[00:03:44] of father in palestinians and there has been push and
[00:03:47] pull between us on the
[00:03:51] of borders
[00:03:52] of especially across the raf the rafa crossing
[00:03:55] border and we have managed to get into to get the supplies and
[00:03:59] the into the gas for the
[00:04:03] Palestinian people and we're still actually pushing
[00:04:07] with the
[00:04:08] of sharms peace plan and um we
[00:04:12] do need more international society pressure
[00:04:15] on Israel that's why we do need the EU and more
[00:04:19] pressure on the Israeli part
[00:04:21] of because we're talk we're talking about very small
[00:04:25] area of land the Gaza strip and it's totally
[00:04:29] destructed. with 1 million half people
[00:04:32] among dead bodies on the
[00:04:36] sides and only the sea in front
[00:04:38] of them, only in the Mediterranean in front
[00:04:41] of them, so Egypt as a state has been pushing and
[00:04:44] pushing with our efforts, diplomatic efforts and we have
[00:04:48] managed to get
[00:04:50] a some infrastructure tools and
[00:04:54] workers and so to rebuild gaza, but we do
[00:04:58] need more international. society pressure, especially
[00:05:02] of today with Trump jeeperdizing world peace with the
[00:05:05] Iranian war, and not only that, also
[00:05:08] threatening international court of justice today.
[00:05:12] and and threating that that there would be no such
[00:05:16] authority in the world threatening that there would be no
[00:05:20] international law in the world, so god
[00:05:24] knows what will happen with one million and a half people in Gaza, only the sea
[00:05:28] in front them with no more international society
[00:05:32] pressure on Israel to have those people still alive
[00:05:35] on their land. Masara Kira, expert international relations,
[00:05:39] founder the European North African center for research, thank you. very much for taking time
[00:05:43] out for unfold tonight,
[00:05:45] we really appreciate that, with that we come to the end the first segment of
[00:05:48] today's show. into the second segment, we are going to
[00:05:52] understand what is exact exactly happening when it comes
[00:05:55] to the US Iran conflict is concerned, we know for fact that
[00:05:59] Washington has decided to postpone any fresh
[00:06:03] strikes against Iran until after the midterm elections,
[00:06:06] also when we talk about there are there are increased
[00:06:10] attacks by the Houti rebels against King of Saudi Arabia, kingdom of Saudi
[00:06:14] Arabia has befittingly responded to this
[00:06:17] particular aggression on the part of Futi rebels, also that
[00:06:21] commitment of standing behind the kingdom
[00:06:25] of Saudi Arabia, coming from Pakistan as well as
[00:06:29] Turkey, all these three countries entered into a
[00:06:33] mutual defense agreement, Makka defense
[00:06:36] agreement and Pakistan has already deployed its
[00:06:40] troops over there. that has been confirmed by the DJI
[00:06:44] SPR, also Pakistan's commitment when it comes to ensuring the
[00:06:47] sovereignty, territorial integrity and overall security the kingdom
[00:06:51] of Saudi Arabia, we know for fact both turkey
[00:06:54] and Pakistan had
[00:06:58] given that applause when it comes to the vigilance and preparedness of kingdom of Saudi
[00:07:02] Arabia in dealing and thorting this threat by the
[00:07:06] auti rebels, also we know for fact there was already a destruction as far as the
[00:07:10] state of Homus is concerned, also uncertainity
[00:07:13] around Red Sea as well as Babel Mander, we have already
[00:07:17] seen the consequences all around the globe in terms the economic
[00:07:21] consequences also with the increased oil prices, the rising
[00:07:25] shipping costs also manifesting into
[00:07:28] inflation, at the same time we have
[00:07:32] seen the regional countries trying their utmost in order to
[00:07:36] bring the situation back to some sort
[00:07:40] of normalcy through the diplomate. intervention
[00:07:43] we know for fact Pakistan played a pivoted role when it came to deescalating the
[00:07:47] situation between Iran and the US, its commitment on
[00:07:50] one side with the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, security also
[00:07:54] urging for the deescalation the situation.
[00:07:58] What does that exactly means and what are the chances of
[00:08:01] diplomacy taking precedence or lead in comparison
[00:08:05] to the military escalation,
[00:08:07] that is the key question we are going to understand, for that we are honored to
[00:08:11] been joined by Mr. Joe. Hood, former acting secretary of
[00:08:15] state for near Eastern affairs. Mr.
[00:08:18] Hood, thank you very much for being with us on the show tonight, really appreciate
[00:08:22] that. Also, we are honored to being joined by Dr. Stephen Turner, he is
[00:08:26] analyst geopolitical Affairs. Dr. Turner, thank you very much for your time also for
[00:08:30] being with us on the show tonight, really appreciate that ambassador. I'll
[00:08:34] begin with you, what sense should we be
[00:08:38] making of this decision on the part of Washington
[00:08:42] to post? postpone the new strikes against Iran until after
[00:08:46] the midterm elections. Well, thank you for having
[00:08:49] me. I think that Donald Trump wants to do a couple of things. First, he
[00:08:53] wants to remind the regime in Tehran that military
[00:08:57] action is still an option, and that they
[00:09:00] should consider that in terms their
[00:09:03] diplomacy. And second, I think he wants to
[00:09:07] make sure that the American public and the oil markets understand
[00:09:11] that he's not. going to do anything that's going to
[00:09:15] cause oil prices to spike even temporarily
[00:09:18] between now and the final day the election on November
[00:09:21] 3rd, because most Americans are not
[00:09:25] following the day-to-day of this war,
[00:09:29] you see interviews of people on the street in various media outlets
[00:09:32] and some the people are only vaguely
[00:09:36] aware that there is a war with Iran, but what they're very
[00:09:39] aware of is how much they're spending to put gasoline in their vehicles
[00:09:43] every day. Americans drive average about 50
[00:09:47] kilometers a day to get to work, so this is
[00:09:51] something that American voters feel very acutely,
[00:09:54] and uh, so Donald Trump is not going to want to do anything that's going to
[00:09:58] cause them to feel more pain at the
[00:10:02] gasoline pump uh before they go to the
[00:10:05] elections for the Congress and the Senate
[00:10:09] on November 3rd. Please do correct me. If I am
[00:10:12] wrong, I I watched one the clips of Mr. President Donald
[00:10:16] Trump when he was asked about the question
[00:10:20] regarding the diesel coming from from Russia, now he is thank
[00:10:24] president put in on that particular front, is that correct and
[00:10:27] what sort of an impact it is going to have when it comes to President Trump
[00:10:31] saying that there is lot of oil that is going to come in
[00:10:35] America in the coming days, do you think it's going to have
[00:10:39] a considerable relief for the citizens and could perhaps
[00:10:41] sway in in the general public
[00:10:45] opinion when it comes to the lowest approval ratings for president Donald Trump just
[00:10:49] before the November midterm elections? the short
[00:10:53] answer is no, this is not enough diesel to
[00:10:57] make any effect on the uh world market
[00:11:00] and prices in the United States are set by world market prices,
[00:11:04] not by simply what supply we have inside the
[00:11:08] United States, so um, I think if the
[00:11:12] president was hoping to have an effect on the
[00:11:15] futures trading and and the price of diesel from day
[00:11:19] today, that has already failed, and I don't think
[00:11:23] that these deliveries of diesel are... going to have enough time even to
[00:11:26] have an effect on the market uh, because you know voting
[00:11:30] is already underway, most states allow some
[00:11:34] form of early voting, absent voting, so
[00:11:38] lot of Americans have already cast their ballots or are getting
[00:11:42] ready to do so in the next couple of weeks, so even
[00:11:45] if uh these deliveries were to have an effect sometime
[00:11:49] toward the end of October, that probably would be too late for many
[00:11:53] voters, exactly you. is well taken, please stay with us
[00:11:56] ambassadorhood, let me bring in Dr. Turner into the discussion also. Dr.
[00:12:00] Turner, what's your understanding when we try to analyze as to what are
[00:12:04] the stakes with the for the Donald Trump's
[00:12:07] administration at this point in time, just before the
[00:12:11] midterm elections happen in November with Iran conflict
[00:12:15] is concerned?
[00:12:17] Well, the Trump administration
[00:12:20] is running scared at this point, I mean the the Republican Party.
[00:12:25] is anticipating major losses in the elections for both the US
[00:12:29] house of representatives and for the US senate, and
[00:12:33] so the president is trying to find a way to minimize those
[00:12:36] losses, if not try to make some gains, by making even his foreign
[00:12:40] policy geared toward lowering gas prices,
[00:12:44] that's
[00:12:44] a very strange way to be acting um, at least - for
[00:12:48] example, if I were in the military a forward deployed
[00:12:52] naval vessel or a base around Iran, and I heard the president say
[00:12:56] that he was not going to strike Iran until the middle
[00:13:00] of November because the elections, I would be
[00:13:04] very concerned, because in the meantime, it kind of gives the
[00:13:07] Iranian military and the IRGC an opportunity to build up their
[00:13:11] capacity to launch to launch attacks, to put things in motion and even to
[00:13:15] launch attacks with without the threat the United
[00:13:18] States um being willing to strike back, and that's very confusing,
[00:13:22] I mean I don't believe that if Iran were to... strike a US base then the United
[00:13:26] States would refrain from striking back, but to try to put
[00:13:30] the the war in between the United States and Iran and context
[00:13:34] of election campaigning is is very is very
[00:13:37] weird, and further more the efforts
[00:13:40] to you know lower the price of diesel by
[00:13:44] buying diesel or allowing Russia to sell
[00:13:48] diesel to the global market, and a time when eum
[00:13:52] Europe is a war with Russia fighting against Ukraine.
[00:13:55] "and the United States is at war with Iran who's also receiving intelligence
[00:13:59] and support from Russia is very strange because it it
[00:14:02] effectively um aiding the enemy a war where we're
[00:14:06] fighting against them, Russia is not an ally the United
[00:14:10] States, so these are these are very interesting choices to be
[00:14:13] making coming up coming up to an election from foreign policy
[00:14:17] standpoint. Dr. Turn, that is exactly the point I'm
[00:14:21] curious to understand you about when it comes to President Donald Trump."
[00:14:25] talking of and thanking president Putin for sending in the diesel.
[00:14:29] now there was an earlier stance when it comes to Trump's administration regarding
[00:14:33] Russian oil, more specifically when we talk about
[00:14:36] India. now he had been saying about
[00:14:40] it that that oil was actually fueling the Ukraine
[00:14:43] war. now at this point in time is thanking president
[00:14:47] Putin for sending in the diesel. so with this
[00:14:51] contradiction, do you how do you think it's going to play out for the voters?
[00:14:55] just when they are about to go for the midterm
[00:14:58] elections, well the the voting public in
[00:15:02] the United States is very polarized, and that's by
[00:15:05] design, so I i'm certain that the
[00:15:09] you know people that are opposed to the current administration are going
[00:15:13] to take these statements and become further infuriated by
[00:15:16] them, and and it'll help galvanize them to to vote against him, but his
[00:15:20] supporters, if there even going to be if if
[00:15:24] the... media that reports um that is
[00:15:28] washed by trump supporters even reports on these issues they will minimize
[00:15:32] them or change them so that it plays well well for them so
[00:15:36] mean "the reality is less
[00:15:40] important in the in in when it comes to campaigning than
[00:15:43] the way that the campaigners are able to spend
[00:15:47] right, coming back to you ambassador hood, when we try to
[00:15:51] analyze Trump administration's policy ever since this invasion
[00:15:55] happened on 28th of February, is there any
[00:15:58] specified pattern that we can develop after looking at what President
[00:16:02] Trump has done on this front or do we see back and
[00:16:06] forth" contradictions and statements and actions and
[00:16:10] do you see any any aspect the entire
[00:16:13] strategy working out? because clearly we see Iranians
[00:16:17] rejecting any sort of a pressure, rejecting any sort
[00:16:21] of military pressure or coersion,
[00:16:24] yet on the other side they remain open to dialogue
[00:16:28] but not under pressure and coersion, so
[00:16:31] if this sort of a strategy or pattern
[00:16:35] of strategy on the Trump part of... Trump Trump's administration did not
[00:16:39] work out throughout so far, so how do you think
[00:16:43] this policy of maximum pressure going to work out in
[00:16:47] future and how he is going to get something out of
[00:16:51] it to show to the public that at the end the day that he had got some sort
[00:16:55] of victory? Well, as career
[00:16:58] diplomat i would disagree with you, I don't see any signs that the
[00:17:02] regime is ready for dialogue, what they're ready for is
[00:17:06] capitulation. "and that is true of President Trump as
[00:17:10] well, uh, that's why we see them issuing uh
[00:17:14] seven-point statements about all the things the United States needs to
[00:17:17] do in order for Iran then to enter into uh
[00:17:21] discussions again, and these include uh things
[00:17:25] that are, I think normal and reasonable for a
[00:17:29] dialogue, which would be unfreezing
[00:17:32] Iran's frozen assets uh,
[00:17:35] and stopping..." uh the naval blockade
[00:17:39] in exchange for Iran no longer firing on commercial
[00:17:43] ships in those waters uh, but it also
[00:17:47] includes completely ridiculous uh requirements such
[00:17:51] as ending the war on all fronts, and what they mean
[00:17:55] by that, as we discovered after the demise the
[00:17:59] memorandum of understanding, is that Israel has to stop
[00:18:03] fighting Hezbollah, the Lebanese government has to stop fighting
[00:18:06] Hezbollah, "the Iraqi government has to stop fighting Iran's
[00:18:10] militias there, the regime
[00:18:13] in in
[00:18:16] the the huti regime in Yemen needs to be given cart
[00:18:20] blanche in that country, this
[00:18:23] is ridiculous,
[00:18:24] I mean the United
[00:18:25] States government cannot speak for all these
[00:18:28] other sovereign governments when it makes a deal with
[00:18:32] Iran, and that's exactly what Iran is demanding in order to
[00:18:36] move to an. actual diplomatic discussion,
[00:18:40] so those
[00:18:40] are all that's just non those are non-starters, so I don't think
[00:18:44] that the Iranians are actually ready for dialogue
[00:18:48] that part of already signed mou, although it fell
[00:18:52] apart the islam memorandum of understanding, but the
[00:18:55] yemen front was pretty much part of that and the US pretty much
[00:18:59] agreed to that, wasn't that the case?
[00:19:03] no, those were separate things, it was the leban, seek your pardon, it was the...
[00:19:07] lebanon lebanon front again,
[00:19:11] no, I think that President Trump fully
[00:19:15] intends on, not getting
[00:19:19] in the way of governments like Israel or Lebanon
[00:19:23] or Iraq in taking over
[00:19:27] the full sovereignty their own
[00:19:30] countries, I don't think any American president would
[00:19:34] stand in the way of that, so I think for the... Iranians to
[00:19:38] be demanding that, they know that that's a non-starter, and I think it
[00:19:41] shows that they're just not serious about a real conversation, a real
[00:19:45] discussion with the United States government about a long-term modus for
[00:19:49] vendi, so so so as per your
[00:19:52] understanding, given this assessment of yours, what is
[00:19:56] behind this, what is, what is the motivation when it comes
[00:20:00] to Iran's government's approach towards this whole crisis
[00:20:04] concerned, why are they serious for your understanding? when it comes
[00:20:08] to the serious negotiations or striking any sort of
[00:20:11] sustainable agreement with the US is concerned?
[00:20:15] well, I have the interesting
[00:20:18] opportunity of sitting with Iranian commentators
[00:20:21] in various media platforms and I've been doing
[00:20:25] so over the past six months on regular basis.
[00:20:29] now we know
[00:20:30] that these commentators generally receive their talking points from the revolutionary
[00:20:34] guard, so what we hear from them, I think we can understand.
[00:20:50] take over, we own the straight of Hormus now, we
[00:20:53] have hegemany where you have lost it, this
[00:20:57] is like the SUS moment for the United
[00:21:00] Kingdom, they used to be the security guarantor the
[00:21:03] region, then it had to pass to the United States, now it's
[00:21:07] passing to us, Iran, that's the very clear
[00:21:10] message, and I don't think anyone in the world
[00:21:13] frankly signs up to that, which is why
[00:21:17] there hasn't been any government in the world that has put out
[00:21:20] supportive of teran's positions right ambassador hood,
[00:21:24] let me take this very interesting point to Dr. Turner also Dr.
[00:21:28] Turner, what's your assessment, are the Iranians
[00:21:32] to enter into negotiations for any sustainable agreement with the US, and also
[00:21:36] do
[00:21:37] you do you think if the Iranians consider it as Swiss canal
[00:21:41] moment
[00:21:42] for for them v the straight of homose
[00:21:45] crisis? Well, I can certainly see why
[00:21:49] the Iranian. consider to have won the conflict, at least at
[00:21:52] this stage, the United States has not been able to stop them from
[00:21:56] blocking the street of war moves, they haven't been able to get the
[00:22:00] Iranians to stop shooting missiles and rockets at
[00:22:04] their gulf neighbors or at American military bases, and even
[00:22:08] though the United States and and Israel have
[00:22:10] destroyed much of
[00:22:13] Iran's air force and
[00:22:16] long long um distance. military
[00:22:20] capabilities and most likely it's nuclear
[00:22:23] program, Iran has pulled the trump card in by even
[00:22:27] just threatening to block the formus, they've put, they've effectively
[00:22:31] imposed crippling sanctions on the global economy, especially the United States, I
[00:22:35] mean the Trump administration strategy of imposing further sanctions
[00:22:39] is not really going to move the needle at all, the United States has been imposing sanctions
[00:22:43] on the Islamic Republic since 1979, it's
[00:22:47] over 45 years, the only way that united states really
[00:22:51] could expect to change the outcome the
[00:22:54] situation is by um
[00:22:58] significantly increasing the scope the conflict, and I don't think the
[00:23:01] United States currently is willing to do anything the sort, so
[00:23:05] really Iran has no need to set
[00:23:09] realistic negotiations, I mean they know the
[00:23:13] United States has been negotiating with them for several decades, it knows
[00:23:17] what the Iranian regimes and until the... United States is ready
[00:23:21] to give Iran those things, Iran has no need
[00:23:25] to change the way it's been acting, doesn't have reason
[00:23:28] to to lift the blockade, the blockade, it doesn't have
[00:23:32] reason to negotiate in good faith,
[00:23:36] so we'll see, I mean Iran can sit out, can
[00:23:40] continue this situation and keep the status quo for years if it needs
[00:23:43] to, the they have no
[00:23:45] reason, right, Dr. Stephen
[00:23:49] Turner. analyst geopolitical affairs, thank you very much for taking time out for unfold tonight, we
[00:23:53] really appreciate that, one last question, mean
[00:23:57] whatever is happening, i understand from
[00:24:01] you are coming, all of those point make huge
[00:24:05] sense, do we understand any the regional mediators
[00:24:08] including pakistan which played a pivot role when it came to the signing
[00:24:12] of Islamabad mou, also lot of efforts being put
[00:24:16] in by Qatar, Egypt, also lot of emphasis on the part of
[00:24:21] Is there any sort of leverage with any these mediators
[00:24:25] to perhaps bring back both the sides once again to the
[00:24:28] negotiating table or what
[00:24:31] would
[00:24:39] it breaking news coming our way where the prime minister of pakistan shahbas sharif has strongly
[00:24:43] condemned the henous acts from the hoothi rebels the attacks
[00:24:47] on the Saudi Arabian Kingdom. targeted the civilians
[00:24:51] as the prime minister condemns the civilian infrastructure that
[00:24:55] has been damaged by the hoothi rebels, the militia attacked on the radh
[00:24:58] airport expresses deepest condolences to the
[00:25:02] berieved families. the prime minister of pakistan shahbas sharif
[00:25:06] calls huti malitia attacks on civilian infrastructure out
[00:25:10] as the prime minister strongly condemns the henous attacks by the
[00:25:13] hoothies. praise for the families who have lost their loved
[00:25:17] ones and solidarity. the kingdom of Saudi
[00:25:21] Arabia, the Prime Minister of Pakistan has
[00:25:25] strongly condemned the heinous attacks by the hutis as prime minister
[00:25:28] expresses deepest condolences with the families and stands in unwaving
[00:25:32] solidarity with Saudi Arabia its leadership and its people. The prime minister of
[00:25:36] Pakistan Shahbas Sharif reaffirms Pakistan's full support to the kingdom of
[00:25:40] Saudi Arabia as he
[00:25:41] expresses deepest
[00:25:45] condolences. He said that Pakistan stands in unwavoring solidarity with the
[00:25:49] Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. its leadership and brotherly people in accordance with the
[00:25:52] maka joint defense agreement. he said that the attacks
[00:25:56] targeted the civilians and critical infrastructure that are completely
[00:25:59] unacceptable and constitute a serious threat. to regional peace and
[00:26:03] stability, such acts of violence which are a flagrant violation of
[00:26:07] international law must seiz immediately. The Prime Minister of
[00:26:10] Pakistan said that Pakistan stands in unwavoring solidarity with the kingdom of Saudi
[00:26:14] Arabia and its leadership. He condemned the heanous
[00:26:18] attacks by the Huti militia and the King Khalid
[00:26:21] International Airport and Riyadh and said that we extend deepest condolences to the
[00:26:25] berieved families and pray for their swift and full recovery the
[00:26:28] injured.
[00:26:32] More news coming your way, on the our, but after a short break, stay tuned to
[00:26:36] Pakistan
[00:26:36] TV.
[00:27:55] Prime minister today, visited Alibaba, it was an extraordinary
[00:27:58] visit, this visit is about
[00:28:02] One message, Pakistan, China relations are moving from
[00:28:06] friendship to investment. Daj
[00:28:10] how, hello, welcome. Pakistan TV is here in
[00:28:14] Beijing.
[00:28:22] There is no longer any blind approval for Israeli
[00:28:26] policy, because the Americans have paid, American soldiers have died,
[00:28:30] hundreds have been injured and hurt, for what? for nothing,
[00:28:33] the military conflict came to
[00:28:37] draw, nobody want, neither side really wants
[00:28:40] to re-engage militarily, so it has
[00:28:43] evolved into economic
[00:28:47] conflict, as society we do stand a chance when it comes to platform
[00:28:51] accountability and specifically protecting our children online, the innocent people
[00:28:55] of Afghanistan are the biggest victim of this application,
[00:28:58] they do not exist, let's be very frank, they do not exist in their...
[00:30:18] Hello and welcome to Pakistan TV, live from Islamabad studios. I am Sn
[00:30:22] Haqani. Let's have look at the
[00:30:24] headline.
[00:30:40] At least 12 people have been killed and 309 others wounded in
[00:30:44] attack on king Khalid international airport in
[00:30:47] Riyadh.
[00:30:54] The Prime Minister Shabbas Sharif strongly condemns the healthy militias attack on King Khalid
[00:30:58] International Airport in Riyadh.