PALESTINETV — broadcast
20260806 103300 UTC
105 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] If it weren't for the United States, Netanyahu would now be
[00:00:03] in the International Criminal Court. In the International Criminal Court, Israel
[00:00:07] would have been condemned by the Security Council. It's true that no one could have closed
[00:00:11] the eyes of the world to what Israel is doing except the United
[00:00:14] States. But does the United States
[00:00:17] have
[00:00:20] many the willingness to tolerate Israeli behavior or Israeli crimes similar
[00:00:24] to what happened in Gaza?
[00:00:27] be beneficial. And the Arabs shouldn't I believe that the United States is displeased with Israeli behavior. I
[00:00:31] believe, and it seeks to find
[00:00:34] solutions. How to find solutions? I
[00:00:38] believe that the countries of the region can
[00:00:40] shed light on the picture or the path for a clearer
[00:00:44] American vision of the necessity
[00:00:47] of stability, and stability cannot be achieved
[00:00:51] unless the Palestinian issue is resolved justly.
[00:00:53] The basis and the
[00:00:57] fundamental pillar for a just solution is to resolve the issue
[00:01:01] of Jerusalem, which is an essential part and core of the Palestinian
[00:01:04] issue, because God forbid if Israel manages
[00:01:08] to impose its will in Jerusalem, that means
[00:01:12] that it will roll towards the Palestinian
[00:01:15] issue. And let me remind you that Jerusalem is
[00:01:19] the capital, the capital of the Palestinian state.
[00:01:22] So when Israel imposes its agenda on
[00:01:24] the capital, that means that its
[00:01:28] plan will proceed unless Islamic countries
[00:01:31] and peoples confront and stand in a unified front. Doctor, there is
[00:01:35] a strategic interest for America with Israel and a strategic interest for Israel
[00:01:39] with America, and there is also a strategic interest for America with Arab
[00:01:43] countries, and there is a strategic interest for Arab countries with America.
[00:01:47] Now, these interests, and we also saw the Jordanian position when
[00:01:51] His Majesty the King went to the White House, and the American President
[00:01:54] was talking about expelling Palestinians from Gaza, and that Jordan
[00:01:58] and Egypt would accept his offer. And that he would establish a Riviera and so on, but
[00:02:02] the Jordanian and Egyptian positions were firm and clear.
[00:02:05] I mean, we want to say it frankly, Jordan is not a major economic
[00:02:09] power and not a major military power, but it has a strategic
[00:02:12] interest, and America understands that, understands the importance
[00:02:16] of the Jordanian political position and its strategic interest with Jordan, and therefore
[00:02:19] His Majesty the King can, and the Jordanian institution can
[00:02:22] formulate decisions against American
[00:02:26] strategic interests for the sake of internal
[00:02:30] files and for the sake of Jordanian stability.
[00:02:32] Therefore, can this also apply to many Arab
[00:02:36] countries and Islamic countries to also prioritize their interests over this president,
[00:02:40] over America, and over the world? Jordan started
[00:02:43] from two main dimensions. The first dimension is the interest of the Palestinian
[00:02:47] people and the necessity for Jordan to continue standing
[00:02:50] by them, along with Egypt, in fact, and they remained firm on this
[00:02:53] position. Second, the Jordanian internal interest
[00:02:56] and the Egyptian internal interest necessitated
[00:02:59] that the two countries stand against any
[00:03:02] displacement operation for their two countries, because that
[00:03:05] would lead not only to demographic
[00:03:08] changes, but to something more important: a feeling of a true
[00:03:12] catastrophe, and this
[00:03:15] strategically threatens stability in both
[00:03:18] countries. Egypt will not feel a strategic danger,
[00:03:22] sorry, a demographic one, but
[00:03:25] its feeling that the displacement of Palestinians in the manner
[00:03:29] that preceded it, like the years '48
[00:03:32] and '67, will lead to extremely dangerous
[00:03:36] political repercussions for the stability of these two countries and
[00:03:40] for the future of the Palestinian people. Therefore,
[00:03:42] their steadfastness was one of
[00:03:45] the main elements
[00:03:47] to deter Trump's idea that he was talking
[00:03:51] about, in addition to not being able to deny the steadfastness of the Palestinian
[00:03:55] people on the ground and their endurance of all these adversities. We cannot
[00:03:58] jump over this point. The people who were displaced
[00:04:02] many times, fled many times, and held on
[00:04:06] to their land, I believe
[00:04:08] this is the hero, and this created heroism, and I
[00:04:11] don't think this narrative that
[00:04:14] was formed by this Palestinian
[00:04:18] behavior can be erased, neither by Israel
[00:04:21] nor by America. Therefore, now I have
[00:04:24] a Jordanian-Egyptian Arab position that was very
[00:04:28] good, indeed.
[00:04:30] Trump's thinking, and this confirms that Trump's thinking is not
[00:04:34] stable, not ideological. Yes, Trump's idea changes
[00:04:38] and changes according to his interest, and changes according to
[00:04:41] the pressure exerted on him and according to the geopolitical
[00:04:45] changes resulting from his position. If he is
[00:04:49] convinced that what he is doing is wrong and not in the interest
[00:04:52] of the United States and will cause Trump
[00:04:55] losses, I believe he will change his mind, and this
[00:04:59] has been proven more than once, because he
[00:05:02] calculates, unlike Joe Biden, for example.
[00:05:05] I wish I were Israeli or Zionist. This
[00:05:09] is out of conviction. This is out of conviction.
[00:05:13] Biden will talk about it because his way of thinking in this
[00:05:16] logic is ideologically based on this idea, but Donald Trump
[00:05:20] doesn't. He has economic interests, he has a deal. A deal
[00:05:24] can achieve a lot for him and lead to results. And this is what should
[00:05:27] be exploited. This is what should be exploited. Linking
[00:05:33] dealings with Trump to concessions
[00:05:36] regarding the Palestinian issue might
[00:05:39] think that they will lose a lot, or the Islamic countries or
[00:05:43] others, that they will lose a lot when they link. No, on the contrary, Trump is concerned
[00:05:47] with his interest. His interest.
[00:05:50] Perhaps he has an interest with Israel. I don't deny that. And the relationship
[00:05:54] with Israel is of a strategic nature between it and the United
[00:05:57] States of America. But it changes.