PRESSTV — broadcast
20261102 023000 UTC
492 transcript segments
Google Speech-to-Text API Automatic Transcription (Chirp)
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:01] of
[00:00:18] لا
[00:00:25] of
[00:00:36] of
[00:00:39] in
[00:00:49] of a Good evening, welcome to spotlight
[00:00:53] here on Press TV, I am Bahmannuray
[00:00:56] a as diplomatic efforts continue to avert another military
[00:00:59] of confront. between Iran and the United States, tensions
[00:01:03] remain
[00:01:04] of dangerously high with Tehran
[00:01:05] a warning that any renewed American aggression could trigger
[00:01:10] of of a conflict extend extending far beyond
[00:01:11] of West Asia. Iranian and Qatari officials have been engaged in intensive
[00:01:15] consultations in Doha with a proposed two-day arrangement to
[00:01:19] reopen the straight of for
[00:01:20] of moves emerging as a potential breakthrough. yet Washington
[00:01:24] continues to leave the military option on the table while reports suggest
[00:01:28] preparations for possible renewed us strikes against Iran after
[00:01:32] the November the 3rd mid-term elections. Terran meanwile insists that
[00:01:36] its military is prepared to respond without any geographical
[00:01:40] limitations. So is diplomacy finally creating a pathway
[00:01:43] towards ending this conflict or are both sides preparing for
[00:01:47] another
[00:01:48] in and potentially wider
[00:01:50] of confrontations? Welcome to spotlight. Once again allow me to introduce my
[00:01:53] guests.
[00:01:59] Sayed moas.
[00:02:00] Shah international law expert and geopolitical analyst joining me from Islamabad
[00:02:04] in
[00:02:06] of Pakistan and Dr. Tamis
[00:02:10] Zimas, assistant professor
[00:02:11] of of International Law University of Nicozia joining me from
[00:02:14] Tessaloniki in Greece. Very good to have you both
[00:02:18] on this um spotlight
[00:02:21] of show, it's very important topic and I hope I'm going to get
[00:02:24] lot um from this session and this um
[00:02:27] of conversation. I'm going to start the conversation with you say it muaz, and that
[00:02:31] is the fact that after eight months of
[00:02:34] of war, of we are witnessing renewed diplomatic activity involving Iran,
[00:02:37] Qatar and the United States, what has changed in the
[00:02:41] calculations
[00:02:42] of the parties that has brought negotiations back to the
[00:02:45] of forefront, are we seeing genuine shift towards ending this
[00:02:49] conflict or simply another attempt to manage
[00:02:51] escalation? well, thank you very much for
[00:02:55] having me, I think one
[00:02:56] of the most important things about this element is
[00:03:00] that this new kind of statement, particularly from the
[00:03:04] IRGC
[00:03:05] in commander is illustrate that
[00:03:08] a look, at the same time we can have diplomacy, but
[00:03:12] understand
[00:03:13] of that we are having diplomatic relations from a position
[00:03:15] of of strength. i think we need to understand this development in three
[00:03:18] dimensions:
[00:03:19] of first, Iran is signaling that
[00:03:22] of deterrance is no longer simply a question of responding proportionately
[00:03:25] within
[00:03:26] of a familiar geographic theater,
[00:03:28] and I think they've been able to... demonstrate that and attempting to communicate
[00:03:32] this, that renewed military aggression against the
[00:03:35] of Islamic Republic of Iran will generate consequences beyond the immediate
[00:03:39] battlefield. Secondly, this announcement by the RGC
[00:03:42] commander must be read alongside with diplomatic efforts that are
[00:03:46] already underway, as you mentioned in
[00:03:49] of Qatar, but the military readiness at the same time having the diplomatic
[00:03:52] engagement are not necessarily
[00:03:56] of contradictory. We have to understand that both used influence the strategic.
[00:04:00] populations
[00:04:00] of the parties and thirdly,
[00:04:02] from an international law perspective, the right to self-defense
[00:04:05] of remains the
[00:04:06] of fundamental overarching point. military response
[00:04:09] by the Islamic Republic Iran must remain subject to the necessity of
[00:04:13] proportionality and international humanitarian law. so ultimately the challenge
[00:04:17] of for of the international
[00:04:18] of community at this moment, particularly in the context
[00:04:20] of these Doha talks, is to help facilitate them further, but there
[00:04:24] is playing its role other parties, state parties around the world that are part of
[00:04:28] this discussion, Turkey, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, all
[00:04:31] of them need to push uh the parties together, and
[00:04:34] of it's not necessarily the Islamic Republic of Iran concerns, as you know the United States has
[00:04:38] been repeatedly when it comes to these talks been the one to back
[00:04:41] pedal, and perhaps these midterm elections, we got that statement
[00:04:45] from um Donald Trump earlier saying
[00:04:48] that probably that there won't be any action until the midterms
[00:04:52] happen, and Abbas Araches, I think comment that was very
[00:04:55] important, we can we can handle it this way in Doha
[00:04:59] or we can handle it. another way, we're prepared to handle it either or way, and I think
[00:05:03] that's the message that Iran wants to give.
[00:05:06] Right, um, Dr. Zemos and world diplomats leader has
[00:05:10] and leader
[00:05:11] of of the Islamic leader has. of and leader the Islamic Revolution has ordered the
[00:05:15] armed forces to prepare immediate response to any renewed
[00:05:19] aggression without geographical limitations. How should we
[00:05:22] interpret this military directive? is Tehran signaling
[00:05:26] that it will it will not allow another round of attacks to unfold under
[00:05:30] the same circumstances as the two previous
[00:05:33] conflicts? I think that this is
[00:05:37] a continuation the military order from the
[00:05:40] marted supreme leader. who had before the
[00:05:44] initiation of this war by before the Ramadan
[00:05:48] war by the US and Israel, um, the
[00:05:52] previous supreme leader of Iran had informed
[00:05:55] everybody that such attack would be confronted with
[00:05:59] regional war, the US and Israel
[00:06:03] didn't count his words as they
[00:06:06] showed, and indeed we had regional war with global
[00:06:10] consequences, now the news. film
[00:06:12] leader, given that the US
[00:06:15] has a significant
[00:06:18] extent been harmed in terms
[00:06:21] their of significantly harmed in terms their military
[00:06:25] presence in the gulf area, so the
[00:06:27] the they probably will
[00:06:31] use some their allies who
[00:06:34] are a bit more from more far from
[00:06:38] Iran than than the gulf region, the news.
[00:06:42] leader informs that the Iranian
[00:06:45] response uh apart from Israel will include
[00:06:49] possibly Cyprus or Greece or
[00:06:53] assist the United States, assist the United States
[00:06:57] and this is quite, but also it's not only
[00:07:00] about the place, it's also about the quality. We know that AI,
[00:07:04] data centers, under sea
[00:07:06] cables, other choke points of global
[00:07:10] commerce may be involved as well.
[00:07:14] so
[00:07:14] the global consequences of this
[00:07:17] already regional conflict will become much much
[00:07:21] wighter and this
[00:07:25] is and this is agility of global economy. i
[00:07:29] think that
[00:07:29] the it is mainly in these regards that ahead
[00:07:33] the that while we're waiting for the midterm elections
[00:07:37] probably the US administration wants to send the
[00:07:41] sign. possibly to calm the market somehow that
[00:07:45] you know negotiations are happening and maybe there will be
[00:07:48] a peaceful solution. i'm not buying that to be
[00:07:51] honest um the odds
[00:07:55] are that the united states of america and israel will launch
[00:07:59] attack right after the midm elections
[00:08:02] in the US and they're
[00:08:04] just buying time
[00:08:07] is forced to climax
[00:08:10] in terms of its response of its milit. response um because
[00:08:14] until now um the US attacks either a
[00:08:18] bleach greek mode or
[00:08:19] in atrition war mode, but the US main goal is the
[00:08:23] same, change of political system in Iran and
[00:08:27] mutilation the Iranian state,
[00:08:29] right? um, state bars, one the most significant
[00:08:33] developments is Iran's proposed two day
[00:08:36] arrangement for the reopening the straight of her most conditional
[00:08:40] on Washington meeting, tarons the... how significant do you see
[00:08:44] this initiative as a confidence building measure and could a
[00:08:48] confidence building measure and could it become the starting point for a
[00:08:52] broader? well absolutely, I think the straight of hormos has
[00:08:56] always been the key pinnacle issue and the Islamic
[00:09:00] Republic of Iran has strategically understood this, has always
[00:09:03] provided and I must say from the beginning of this conflict
[00:09:07] reasonable kind of discussions around
[00:09:10] it, and the United states has been
[00:09:14] unfortunately frustrated by the strategic use the
[00:09:17] of straight of power moves in this conversation because it was never a calculated
[00:09:21] measure when they initiated this aggressive
[00:09:24] action many months ago, and so I think
[00:09:28] Iran has all, said that, look, if you remember in the Islamabad
[00:09:32] talks, this was key element, but Iran would be responsible for it,
[00:09:36] and Iran would also then be able to govern the
[00:09:39] execution of it, it was very clearly written in the mou, and
[00:09:43] unfortunately the United States then of course went back on that the
[00:09:47] situation in Lebanon got out of hand and
[00:09:50] there was a lot of elements that fell back, but what was really surprising is the Islamic
[00:09:54] Republican Iran didn't stop and said that, okay, the talks have broken down
[00:09:58] with the United States and there's still some conflict going on,
[00:10:02] but we're going to still talk with the regional powers and the
[00:10:05] regional partners, we're going to make this straight of hormoves arrangement or
[00:10:09] reality, and they started talks with Oman, and it goes to show you that the
[00:10:13] Islamic Republic is intended well, even without the United
[00:10:16] States, to come with solution to the straight apart moves that is
[00:10:20] equitable that protects it interest and the interest the
[00:10:24] regional allies. and you
[00:10:25] now the countries came partner, partner we could talk to, a good partner,
[00:10:29] partner we could talk to. a good example is the sultanate of
[00:10:32] Oman, has realized in the length of since this
[00:10:36] conflict has started that Iran is the more responsible partner in coming
[00:10:40] to terms with in creating a viable solution to help with global
[00:10:43] shipping, but again Iran has to look for its defense
[00:10:47] interest and people have to understand that when a country is at war, when
[00:10:51] another country, all its allies as well, their ships are... subject
[00:10:55] to special restrictions, and that's what the Islamic Republic of Iran has always
[00:10:59] said that peaceful countries we have no conflict with us are allowed
[00:11:03] to use the straight of moves a responsible manner with their guidance, and
[00:11:07] this is something that international law gives coverage to, so we're hoping that the United States
[00:11:10] finally, finally has understood this and is coming to
[00:11:14] that solution that's always been lying there, but I think Trump has
[00:11:18] been very tough about this for some odd reason, and I think he's
[00:11:22] always looking for some sort of joker out the hat. to try to solve this trade of por
[00:11:26] moves, which is just not possible without the collaboration the Islamic Republic,
[00:11:30] so this is I think the Americans have understood,
[00:11:34] and I hope that Donald Trump understands it
[00:11:36] and they can go back to the plan and allow Iran and reasonal
[00:11:39] um the countries around the straight of hormoos to come
[00:11:43] together for an amicable solution that will be long lasting, but that
[00:11:47] requires the United States to kind of give up, it's uh one lopsided
[00:11:51] demands when it comes to the straight of f. dr. z.
[00:11:55] are mixed signals coming from Washington, though President Trump has
[00:11:58] described negotiations as productive while Secretary of State Marco
[00:12:02] Rubio says the military option is still very much on the table and
[00:12:06] available. How should Teran interpret this dual
[00:12:10] track approach? Is Washington genuinely interested a
[00:12:13] negotiated settlement or is diplomacy also being used to
[00:12:17] extract further concessions?
[00:12:20] Look, um, we can only, obviously I
[00:12:24] don't
[00:12:24] have information. from within the US establishment, but
[00:12:28] we can only be based on on our
[00:12:30] experience. uh, as of
[00:12:34] today, there has been no honesty on behalf the US,
[00:12:37] it is obvious that the United States of America use
[00:12:41] negotiations in terms of manipulating
[00:12:45] their internal public audience, global and global
[00:12:48] markets. if it was in the intention
[00:12:52] the US to reach
[00:12:55] a peaceful settlement with Iran, first of all, the war
[00:12:58] would not have begun since 2025, in
[00:13:02] the first place, or at least it would have been
[00:13:06] concluded with the Mou of Islamabad. The Mou of
[00:13:09] Islamabad was a very accurate way
[00:13:13] towards peace, it was pathway to peace.
[00:13:17] It included specific benchmarks,
[00:13:20] specific provisions that would have lead
[00:13:24] us to. full settlement, it was the United States that
[00:13:27] decided not implement the Mou as soon
[00:13:31] as they signed it, so in order to guess whether
[00:13:35] war will resume or not, we need to go back to the
[00:13:38] fundamentals of this war, to the initial causes
[00:13:42] of this war. why did this war begin? it didn't
[00:13:46] begin because the state of hormos, it began because the
[00:13:50] united states together with Israel attempted to
[00:13:53] move towards as they call it regime change in
[00:13:57] Iran, which is a code name for the destruction the Iranian
[00:14:01] state, so have they abandoned this plan?
[00:14:05] if they consid that they have been defeated, yes,
[00:14:09] but as of today, the US administration doesn't
[00:14:13] seem ready to accept that it has been
[00:14:16] defeated, will they do so after the mitter elections,
[00:14:20] it's possible, i don't consider it very much
[00:14:23] likely, but yes there is... the possibility, unless
[00:14:27] this is the case, unless President Trump is ready to accept
[00:14:31] implicitly, obviously, or even
[00:14:34] explicitly, that he has been defeated, which will
[00:14:38] lease to, which will lead to cataclysmic
[00:14:41] transformations the region with global
[00:14:44] consequences, the main transformation is that the US
[00:14:47] will be finished from the region, unless president Trump is
[00:14:51] ready to do so, the others
[00:14:55] solution, the let's say solution, the other path
[00:14:59] is the path of war. this is why do
[00:15:01] not trust very much these diplomatic
[00:15:05] initiatives. said mars, reports
[00:15:08] indicate, turning more realistic, reports indicated
[00:15:11] washington has privately edged regional allies to
[00:15:15] prepare for possible renewed strikes against iron following the november
[00:15:19] the third midterm elections, how seriously should this be
[00:15:22] taken, this possibility be taken? and I'll be looking at
[00:15:26] preparations for a limited military option, or could this develop into
[00:15:30] a much wider confrontation? your take on
[00:15:32] that? well, as you know,
[00:15:36] in the history of this conflict we have seen that market
[00:15:40] manipulation has actually been the primary goal
[00:15:44] um and it's actually the world market economy that's suffering and few
[00:15:48] people are benefiting off that. there's been many new stories that have already
[00:15:51] exposed white houses engagement with that. and i
[00:15:55] think that's really what Donald Trump is actually pandering to is
[00:15:59] is that baseline support, particularly those who fund
[00:16:03] um him in his political camp manipulation for those announcements
[00:16:06] and ation for those announcements and sudden changes that
[00:16:10] happen right before the weekend and then right after the weekend there's something else, and I
[00:16:14] think that's something that we've seen repeatedly, the markets have proven it, the record
[00:16:18] is there, and we see these massive trades happening 15 minutes
[00:16:22] before Trump makes these outlanger statements and and comments
[00:16:26] from peace to war, and I think that's something that's actually
[00:16:29] very, it's sadly the truth, I mean we can't deny
[00:16:33] the the quantifiable truth that's before us and so if Donald Trump does
[00:16:36] try to... escalate this post uh election time
[00:16:40] period and will it expand to regional
[00:16:43] conflict? um, there is a possibility, mean i'm not taking that
[00:16:47] out the mix, because as we know that there has been some interesting
[00:16:51] activity with the Yemen and Saudi Arabia, and
[00:16:55] they're kind of pushing this idea that the Saudis to get engaged in some
[00:16:59] sort of process, but I was very happy to note that Saudi Arabia,
[00:17:03] Turkey, Pakistan and an Iranian leadership met in
[00:17:06] Tehran. of all places, not in Riyad, not in Istanbul, not in
[00:17:10] Islamabad, but met in Tehran. I think that's a very powerful message
[00:17:14] that whatever the situation may be on the border of
[00:17:17] Yemen, um, that is trying to trigger into
[00:17:20] some possible,
[00:17:22] you know, relationship, deterioration, there is a
[00:17:25] greater goal
[00:17:27] at at play, and I think this is the sort of narrative of a broader
[00:17:30] regional conflict, which is something that the Americans had hope for. I mean, Lindsay Graham's
[00:17:34] famous uh, clip that went viral after he died, clearly indicated
[00:17:38] this is what the Americans wanted, they wanted to uh, strike a
[00:17:42] match and they wanted the oil the Gulf nations to flare up this
[00:17:46] fight uh between Iran and its Gulf brothers, and I think
[00:17:49] that's what Israel and America intended, it didn't go down that way, but as
[00:17:53] my colleagues rightly, rightly indicated that Iran, the
[00:17:57] US and Israel had initial war goals that
[00:18:00] essentially uh have been absolutely unsuccessful, let
[00:18:04] alone they have actually lost ground than what was had before.
[00:18:07] "a lot the Gulf nations do not trust the United States to be a
[00:18:11] military deterrant for their own protection, now they're looking to other
[00:18:14] parties like Turkey and Pakistan and this maka defense for
[00:18:18] example, so these are illustrative of America's loss of
[00:18:22] regional hegemony, and Israel of
[00:18:25] course, attempting to
[00:18:28] deescalate its own kind of attention around
[00:18:32] Gaza and other areas, so unfortunately it's gone back, I don't see this going into
[00:18:36] regional conflict." I see this more as market manipulation, if it does happen,
[00:18:40] small flear up after the mid-term elections. Right, Professor Zimos,
[00:18:44] Iranian officials have also described recent letter from US
[00:18:47] vice president to um Iran's secretary the
[00:18:51] Supreme National Security Council, as a positive indication
[00:18:55] of a change in Washington's diplomatic tone, yet Terran says
[00:18:59] it is not currently prepared for direct negotiations with American
[00:19:03] representatives. What does this tell us about the level of mistrust between
[00:19:07] the... two sides and what guarantees would Iran need before
[00:19:10] entering new negotiating process? i
[00:19:14] will say
[00:19:15] this clearly as possible, if the Iranian
[00:19:18] leadership makes the mistake of accepting anything
[00:19:22] else uh than the full
[00:19:25] implementation the mou of
[00:19:28] islamabad, it will lose significant ground,
[00:19:32] both diplomatically and on the ground. the only
[00:19:36] thing that iran should accept as i
[00:19:39] see it would be the full
[00:19:42] implementation the mou of islam but
[00:19:45] because this is the foundation
[00:19:49] on which both parts agreed in terms of a pieces
[00:19:53] of the
[00:19:54] a peace settlement of a peaceful settlement conflict so why should
[00:19:57] iran accept any
[00:20:01] other document that would give to
[00:20:04] Iran much less I'm not I'm not. much less in terms
[00:20:08] of
[00:20:09] you know of making profit after because the
[00:20:12] world, i'm i'm referring to much less
[00:20:15] in terms of peace guarantees
[00:20:19] of, mean there is an mou and it was
[00:20:22] violated by the united states, so why should iran accept
[00:20:26] anything else,
[00:20:27] any any kind of letter from jd vans or from anyone else? what
[00:20:30] is the actual value of any such document? we
[00:20:34] have an mou that was signed. and it was
[00:20:38] violated the next day or few days afterwards by US
[00:20:42] administration and why was it violated? because the US
[00:20:46] administration actually wants uh...
[00:20:51] let me change that, not necessarily wants, but it is ready to
[00:20:55] accept the destruction of its allies in the
[00:20:59] gulf region in order
[00:21:01] safeguard larger zionist
[00:21:04] interest, larger zionist interests, this is the
[00:21:08] main issue here, so
[00:21:12] no actual basis other than the mou of
[00:21:15] islamabad, there is no any other
[00:21:18] actual basis. for any type of diplomatic
[00:21:22] solution, the crucial question is whether the
[00:21:26] Iranian leadership will accept to step back
[00:21:30] and negotiate it on some other document other
[00:21:33] than other than the mou, which most likely if it does,
[00:21:37] if the Iranian leadership accepts some other basis,
[00:21:41] it will be tricked again,
[00:21:45] and there will be no actual guarantee
[00:21:49] eventually. but the war of of attation will go on
[00:21:53] right, sas speaking about Iranian leadership, the warning that
[00:21:56] new war could extend beyond and west Asia is
[00:22:00] particularly significant. what is the exact geopolitical message
[00:22:04] terran is trying to send to washington and its international
[00:22:08] partners? is Iran attempting to demonstrate that the
[00:22:11] consequences of another aggression against it would not be confined
[00:22:15] to the Persian gulf region? yeah, like
[00:22:19] I said, It's most important to understand this from these
[00:22:23] perspective that this message is that deterrance is
[00:22:26] ultimately about changing and advisary
[00:22:30] advisor adversaries calculation and not
[00:22:33] merely by demonstrating military capability, and I think a
[00:22:37] military unrestricted warning does not
[00:22:41] translate into an unrestricted right to necessarily use
[00:22:45] that, but what it does, it creates the environment
[00:22:48] to push p. to push forward
[00:22:52] a dialogue that may be necessary, and as well question is
[00:22:56] whether both sides can establish credible grounds against another
[00:23:00] cycle of violence, and I feel like the Islamic Republic
[00:23:03] Iran has elevated the conversation,
[00:23:07] and not just said that, we're going to strike wherever we are getting
[00:23:11] targeted, we are now expanding the geographical limits in the
[00:23:15] targeting, and I think that's a very strong message that has elevated the
[00:23:19] conversation, I think... United States is begining to consider the possible
[00:23:23] attacks outside the region in response to that, if those
[00:23:26] facilities are used to attack Iran, Iran has legal
[00:23:29] right in self-defense to target them, and I think
[00:23:33] that's something that would change the dynamics the conflict, if for example
[00:23:37] Iran for would to strike in the United States and I think
[00:23:41] that's something that I think really would shake up things, which is something that
[00:23:45] you know, I think the strategists and geopolitical analys are really
[00:23:49] suggesting that... "this would then change the
[00:23:51] ball game uh, but I think that's an important message, because if you're
[00:23:55] going to have talks unfortunately with the United States, it needs to be done from a
[00:23:59] place of power,
[00:24:00] and I think that's what Iran is attempted to do with these words. Right,
[00:24:04] and professor Zemas, of course, there is a third element to this
[00:24:08] equation and that is the Israeli regime,
[00:24:11] um, how central is Israel's position to the current
[00:24:15] diplomatic deadlock, could Israeli calculation undermine the
[00:24:18] potential US" on agreement:
[00:24:22] yes, profoundly, yes,
[00:24:26] there is a hybrid relationship between US and
[00:24:29] Israel establishment on the basis of
[00:24:33] obviously some very important
[00:24:35] lobbies within the US and some
[00:24:39] strategic
[00:24:40] interest on on some
[00:24:44] strategic interests on behalf the US, which are served by
[00:24:48] the existence of Israel. um, I'm sorry I have to interrupt you,
[00:24:52] professor Zimas, there is also another program that needs to come in, and we are
[00:24:56] pressed for time, I'm really sorry, professor Zemos and also
[00:24:59] sayid, it was a pleasure to have you on this
[00:25:03] spotlight, and that brings us to the end the program, the truth will
[00:25:06] always come
[00:25:07] out.
[00:25:17] This is for palestine. In today's show
[00:25:21] we'll be considering the impact of motion that was adopted by the Green Party of
[00:25:24] England and Wales at their recent conference in Brighton, which clearly
[00:25:28] stated that Zionism is racism. Colonialism is
[00:25:32] evil, slavery is evil, settler colonialism is
[00:25:35] evil, racism isn't evil, and therefore
[00:25:39] this zinism as it's materialized in
[00:25:42] Israel is racism and therefore must
[00:25:46] be conduct as an ideology, it's a very significant
[00:25:50] step, but of course we need to build on it, we need to build on it, most
[00:25:54] obviously by dismantalingism as an ideology and as movement in
[00:25:58] this
[00:25:58] country.
[00:26:09] طول ما في طفل فلسطيني واحد
[00:26:13] في غزه لن يستطيع اي محتل ان
[00:26:16] يطء ارض غزه غزه لاهل
[00:26:19] غزه ترامب ولا غير ترامب واحد بيقدر
[00:26:23] ياخذ ياخذ
[00:26:24] غزه what
[00:26:28] is the jeويش
[00:26:28] identity
[00:26:33] in the Jews who are Zionis and those who are not recent survey
[00:26:36] in the states in the United States the Jewish, the whole
[00:26:40] Jewish community, they're representative sample, and
[00:26:44] there are some around six eight
[00:26:48] million Jews in the states, some
[00:26:51] 60% them no longer identify themselves
[00:26:55] as zianists, it's an astounding
[00:26:57] change.
[00:27:07] 2d,
[00:27:08] 1963.
[00:27:12] Dallas stood still as President John F. Kennedy's motorcade
[00:27:16] entery plaza. Moments
[00:27:19] later, gunshots shattered the silence and changed history
[00:27:23] forever.
[00:27:29] America mourned a suspect was arrested.
[00:27:33] then, before the truth could be uncovered, he was silenced on live
[00:27:37] television. The official story was
[00:27:40] written, but the questions never died: was it the mafia, the
[00:27:44] FBI, the Soviets, or Castro? Or did the real
[00:27:48] secret begin thousands of miles away, buried deep beneath
[00:27:52] the sands the Negev desert near Demona? It is a
[00:27:56] mystery, a conspiracy and assassination that still
[00:28:00] haunts the world.
[00:29:51] Your headlines on press TV. The IRGC says two oil
[00:29:54] tankers trying to cross the straight off for moves through an illegal
[00:29:58] route have exploded and caught fire after striking naval marks.
[00:30:03] Ama strongly condemns the Israely massacre of Gaza's police
[00:30:07] personnel saying the regime seeks to undermine stability and
[00:30:10] cause chaos across the wartorn
[00:30:13] territory and the new poll shows
[00:30:16] 60% of Americans disapprove of Trump's performance in the White
[00:30:20] House just few days after the midterm
[00:30:23] elections.
[00:30:42] Hello everyone, you're watching Press TV live from the studios in
[00:30:46] Tehran, thank you for joining us.
[00:30:50] In our top story, the Islamic Revolution Gaz Course says two oil
[00:30:54] tankers trying to cross the straight of Furmus via an illegal route.