RECORDNEWS — broadcast
20260911 013000 UTC
446 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] an increase of just over 3% compared to
[00:00:03] the initial projection released back in May. The weight of the fruits
[00:00:06] should offset the premature fall of the trees. And how is
[00:00:10] the incidence of greening in the orchards? Guilherme Rodrigues, manager of the
[00:00:14] Crop Estimate survey at Funde Citrus, talks to us.
[00:00:18] We also talk about the expectation for coffee
[00:00:21] production. All this and much more. Rural Record News will
[00:00:25] air at 6 and 7:30 in the
[00:01:09] repercussion of the last few days of these recent
[00:01:12] decisions, first to remove the Director-General of the
[00:01:16] Federal Police, Andrei Rodrigues. Then, in
[00:01:19] sequence, another decision that,
[00:01:22] uh, he can return to the position. Today he is in the
[00:01:25] position of Director-General. How does the association of police
[00:01:29] delegates analyze this issue, these
[00:01:32] decisions, what was the scenario
[00:01:36] for the delegates, for the association? Well, Flávia,
[00:01:40] obviously, the removal of a Director-General, of a director of
[00:01:43] police intelligence is something that affects the daily life of the Federal
[00:01:47] Police, affects the interests, including those of the delegates as
[00:01:51] a class, so the day before yesterday we issued a note
[00:01:55] and expressed our interest, the request
[00:01:58] for caution so that... this type of decision is taken by the
[00:02:02] plenary, precisely so that by the plenary of the Federal Supreme Court,
[00:02:05] due to the importance of the Federal Police, this is not written anywhere,
[00:02:09] there is no norm yet approved in this sense of, uh,
[00:02:13] but out of care for an institution like the Federal Police,
[00:02:17] with the importance of the Federal Police, such a serious measure as this, we
[00:02:21] understand that it should come directly from the plenary so that it would be
[00:02:24] definitive in the sense of its security, it will not be reformed
[00:02:28] at all times. And that would bring greater
[00:02:32] tranquility to the institution, one day we have a director, the next
[00:02:36] day we don't, the next day we have one again, we don't know if next week
[00:02:40] we will have one, right? Uh, it causes an
[00:02:43] undesirable instability in the institution, this
[00:02:46] instability has been going on for weeks and it became
[00:02:50] exacerbated with these decisions, uh, how do you
[00:02:53] evaluate, how are the inquiries, the
[00:02:57] investigations that are underway now? Well,
[00:03:00] uh, we have been following this issue for a long time, right?
[00:03:03] And we talked to the delegates who do
[00:03:07] investigations, we talked to everyone involved to
[00:03:10] understand if there was any attack on the
[00:03:14] prerogatives of the delegate position, which is what interests us, if the Federal Police itself would be at risk. We came to
[00:03:17] the conclusion that there are mutual suspicions,
[00:03:21] there are mutual divergences between the leadership of the Federal Police, the
[00:03:25] office of Minister André Mendonça in the STF, and that the
[00:03:28] position itself, the prerogatives were not at risk. Uh,
[00:03:32] we only decided to speak out when
[00:03:35] help the the Attorney General of the Republic,
[00:03:38] Gonê, uh, said he was going to open a procedure, he didn't
[00:03:42] open a police control procedure, an external police
[00:03:45] control against the people who are doing investigation. Then we said, how is
[00:03:49] this going to be? Everyone is
[00:03:52] heavy rains hit the in their positions, everyone is deciding if they are going to be investigated, then
[00:03:55] they are going to investigate first who does investigation. So we issued a
[00:03:58] note and, uh, by common sense, Minister
[00:04:02] Faquim yesterday, uh, suspended this procedure. We also
[00:04:06] commented on the intelligence
[00:04:09] reports. In this decision, the first decision was monocratic,
[00:04:12] the second decision was also monocratic. You said that the
[00:04:16] association's defense is that it goes to the plenary. There
[00:04:19] are also arguments that this decision to remove or not a director
[00:04:22] general would be the prerogative of the President of the
[00:04:26] Republic, uh, for the association, if it had gone
[00:04:30] already to the plenary or how it will go from now on, right, then
[00:04:33] yes it would have been, uh, it would have generated less
[00:04:36] uh, less instability,
[00:04:40] that is exactly the point that we defend that if it were a decision of the
[00:04:44] plenary, a collegiate body with all the ministers, even more so with the
[00:04:48] internal divergences that exist in the STF, which are known,
[00:04:51] uh, a more definitive decision in relation to a precautionary measure of
[00:04:55] removal of a director, of another director, of two police directors,
[00:04:59] by the plenary would be... safer uh, regarding the President of the
[00:05:02] Republic having the prerogative, really the prerogative is his, only
[00:05:06] that the judiciary controls acts and it is within the scope of the
[00:05:10] judiciary to take precautionary measures. There is a
[00:05:13] divergence, an instability between the relations of the
[00:05:17] Federal Police with the Federal Supreme Court, a
[00:05:20] crisis? It seems to me that there are divergences and there are distrusts
[00:05:24] between, uh, especially between the office of
[00:05:27] Minister André Mendo, who conducts two of the most
[00:05:30] sensitive investigations due to the electoral period, which is compliance
[00:05:34] zero, which involves Banco Master Master
[00:05:37] of the NSS, the "no discount" operation, and that a certain
[00:05:41] distrust was established
[00:05:45] uh, about whether the leadership of the federal police could be making
[00:05:48] interventions in the investigation, delaying the investigation due to the electoral
[00:05:52] period, uh, and it seems to me very clear a
[00:05:56] distrust also on the part of the leadership of the federal police whether Minister André
[00:06:00] Mendonça is trying to direct or, uh, anticipate
[00:06:03] investigations due to the electoral period. It seems to me that this is the big
[00:06:06] divergence, it's very much in the political sphere. This crisis then
[00:06:10] would be a distrust of the current? Of the Federal
[00:06:13] Police institution itself, if we have the judiciary that
[00:06:17] would be
[00:06:19] uh, perhaps doubting this work, then the federal public ministry
[00:06:23] comes wanting to open an investigation about the reports that were
[00:06:26] produced. When you see this, it's to think that there's
[00:06:29] really something suspicious or something going outside
[00:06:33] of what it should be for the Federal Police, because the delegate is there doing
[00:06:36] his job of conducting an inquiry, this is very important to investigate, this is very
[00:06:40] important, Flávia. The delegates who do the... investigation, I'm not talking about the leadership of the
[00:06:44] Federal Police, the leadership of the Federal Police does not conduct investigations, what it seems
[00:06:47] like because of the name of the Director General appearing
[00:06:50] all the time is that he conducts investigations, that he is responsible
[00:06:54] for delaying or, or, or
[00:06:57] uh, directing investigations, but that is not his role, he does not conduct investigations. Who
[00:07:01] conducts investigations are the delegates who are
[00:07:04] in the case itself. So when, when, uh,
[00:07:08] threats of investigations come because they only complied with a judicial
[00:07:12] decision that should be controlled by the judiciary, it is the judiciary that has to
[00:07:15] know if the extent if it could or could not, the
[00:07:18] colleagues only complied with a judicial decision. Then they will be held
[00:07:22] accountable for complying with a judicial decision. Now, this
[00:07:25] request from the Attorney General's Office for the investigation of external
[00:07:29] control of the Federal Police, it has also been suspended, this is a
[00:07:33] positive side for the Federal Police delegates to continue acting
[00:07:37] as they are, because they comply with the measure, what is
[00:07:41] determined by the... justice and therefore they continue
[00:07:44] the investigations. We hope that in the merits, in the plenary
[00:07:48] decision, the cancellation of this measure will be maintained, this measure
[00:07:51] is even intimidating in relation to those
[00:07:55] who are doing investigations. When we have an investigation in progress,
[00:07:58] what is the role of the delegates and what is
[00:08:01] the role for us to separate the function of the Director-General of the Federal
[00:08:05] Police? He does not have access to the investigation. The investigation is conducted
[00:08:08] by a delegate, this investigation is conducted by...
[00:08:12] career delegates,
[00:08:14] uh, who passed a public exam, the Director-General is also a career
[00:08:18] delegate who passed a public exam, but the functions are totally different, uh, these
[00:08:22] delegates do investigations, the Director General administers the Federal Police, he
[00:08:26] has to seek resources, bring
[00:08:28] working conditions, uh, represent the Federal
[00:08:32] Police in the most diverse, uh, alongside the most
[00:08:35] diverse entities and institutions,
[00:08:39] but, uh, he does not conduct investigations, this must be very clear to society.
[00:08:43] The leadership of the Federal Police does not conduct
[00:08:46] investigations and should not, uh, get
[00:08:49] involved in them, right? What has been happening is that the
[00:08:53] production of Federal Police reports has been questioned,
[00:08:57] first there was a report made for Minister André
[00:09:00] Mendonça at his request to deliver, uh, that
[00:09:04] issue of requesting the investigation against Minister
[00:09:07] Alexandre de Moraes, the Attorney General, it was
[00:09:11] Minister André. Mendonça determined
[00:09:14] that the Federal Police make a report for him. The Federal Police
[00:09:18] complied with a court order and delivered this
[00:09:22] report. Is this customary?
[00:09:25] Well, the
[00:09:29] STF has a discussion about judicial
[00:09:32] activism, especially from the STF, whether the judge
[00:09:35] can have, uh, the initiative in
[00:09:38] certain situations. The fact is, the judiciary has been
[00:09:42] doing this for years, by various ministers, they are
[00:09:46] active, they ask for diligences, they
[00:09:49] act, right? And in this case, the minister asked
[00:09:52] for, as far as we know, the identification of the
[00:09:55] interlocutors of that conversation that was caught
[00:09:58] on Daniel Vorcaro's cell phone, right?
[00:10:02] So it's a request from him based, substantiated, it was sent
[00:10:06] to the Federal Police, the Federal Police complied and has to discuss whether
[00:10:10] to deliver a report, no way. The Federal
[00:10:13] Police cannot, uh,
[00:10:16] disobey a judicial decision, so the decision arrived, uh,
[00:10:20] it is complied with, right? And who has to
[00:10:23] respond if the judge could or could not have the initiative is the
[00:10:27] Federal Supreme Court. In your opinion, was there an undue
[00:10:31] investigation ordered by Minister André
[00:10:35] Mendonça regarding another minister of the court, Minister Alexandre de
[00:10:38] Moraes? In your opinion, uh, I don't, I'm not going to give my opinion,
[00:10:42] I speak on behalf of 2,400 associates here, so I
[00:10:46] would have to say what they understand, and there are diverse opinions about whether it could, could not, whether
[00:10:50] it's right, whether it's not right, so we don't have a consolidated position on the
[00:10:53] merits of this situation. Let's wait then for what will be decided in the
[00:10:56] plenary of the Supreme Court, right? It's more prudent. Mr. President, after Minister
[00:11:00] André Mendonça lifted the secrecy of a
[00:11:03] report of his with conversations between the former banker Daniel
[00:11:07] Vorcaro and Minister Alexandre de Moraes, Minister
[00:11:10] Alexandre de Moraes himself, in sequence, using intelligence
[00:11:14] reports, he questioned the
[00:11:17] conduct of the reporting minister of the Masser case, Minister
[00:11:21] André Mendonça. These intelligence reports of the...
[00:11:25] Federal Police, who are they made by, for whom and
[00:11:29] with whom should they circulate? Let's,
[00:11:32] let's make a differentiation between this intelligence report
[00:11:35] used by Minister Moraes, the report that was used by Minister
[00:11:39] André Mendonça, okay. The report used by Minister
[00:11:43] André Mendonça, within an investigation, he
[00:11:47] asked, determined that the Federal Police delegates
[00:11:50] make an information to identify who was the
[00:11:54] interlocutor of Danielcaro in material
[00:11:57] collected from his cell phone that was seized within an
[00:12:00] investigation, uh, intelligence report
[00:12:03] requested by Minister Alexandre de Moraes to the Federal Police. He requested, uh,
[00:12:07] intelligence reports that have nothing to do with investigation, that evaluated
[00:12:11] there several situations, uh,
[00:12:14] the reasons for his request I, I'm not going to
[00:12:17] comment, but we need to know how he knew about these
[00:12:21] reports, because Federal Police intelligence reports are confidential. They are
[00:12:25] produced by the intelligence units to
[00:12:28] subsidize administrative decisions of the Federal
[00:12:31] Police leaders and should circulate only among them and
[00:12:35] should not be known by anyone else, neither outside
[00:12:39] nor inside the police, so uh, what should be
[00:12:43] investigated that surprised us a lot was the existence of these reports
[00:12:47] being made public by this request,
[00:12:51] uh, another aspect that bothers us is...
[00:12:55] is the content of some reports that evaluate
[00:12:58] the performance of the delegates within the investigation, evaluate lines of
[00:13:02] investigation, evaluate if representations were well made or not
[00:13:05] were, uh, this puts at
[00:13:08] risk the investigative autonomy of the delegates, because they are already
[00:13:12] controlled, they are controlled by the Public Ministry, by the
[00:13:15] judiciary, by the defense, by the General Corregedoria of the
[00:13:18] Federal Police, it is not up to the intelligence
[00:13:21] sectors to control the delegates, the
[00:13:25] laws do not provide for this control, so
[00:13:28] we also feel very uncomfortable with this
[00:13:31] production, I spoke with several delegates who have a history of working in the intelligence
[00:13:35] areas of the Federal Police and they said they had never seen this,
[00:13:39] so I hope it is a punctual practice and that it does not
[00:13:43] spread in the Federal Police, because it is irregular, right?
[00:13:47] When Minister André Mendonça asks for the removal
[00:13:50] of the Director General, he alleges that he was also
[00:13:54] being monitored. Sir, uh, for
[00:13:57] the association, is this argument valid, not
[00:14:00] valid, or is it not possible to evaluate it yet? Uh, once again, it is not possible to evaluate the
[00:14:04] argument, it was presented, uh, with
[00:14:06] legal basis, then the plenary has to analyze whether
[00:14:10] this situation is sustainable. For us, the
[00:14:13] association, we uh, were
[00:14:16] surprised, we didn't know that this type of report was being
[00:14:19] produced. Uh, the situation of the report
[00:14:23] making, uh, the... analysis of the conduct of the inquiries
[00:14:27] by the delegates bothers us a lot, because the
[00:14:30] inquiry is already controlled by the judiciary, by the Public
[00:14:34] Ministry, by the defenses, by the General Corregedoria of the Federal Police,
[00:14:37] it should not be analyzed and controlled by
[00:14:40] intelligence. This flow even puts at
[00:14:44] risk the investigative autonomy of the Federal
[00:14:48] Police delegates and this bothers us a lot. I hope that
[00:14:51] this procedure is not common. "I
[00:14:55] spoke with several delegates who worked in this area in the
[00:14:58] past, in the intelligence areas, they said they
[00:15:01] had never seen things of this nature. Is there an
[00:15:04] interference then in the work of the Federal Police for the
[00:15:07] delegates? Uh, no, what is the feeling? Uh, we
[00:15:11] sought to know if there were interferences, whether
[00:15:14] internal, whether external, the situation
[00:15:17] is very, it is very fluid, it is not possible to say either
[00:15:21] that there is, or that there is not, uh, intervention. So..."
[00:15:25] the procedures were established, they are investigating, the plenary
[00:15:28] will determine or not the necessary investigations and we will wait for the
[00:15:32] conclusions. We talked at the very beginning of the interview about
[00:15:35] the position of the...
[00:15:37] of the Director-General of the Federal Police. It is a position that is
[00:15:41] indicated by the President of the Republic, but the Federal
[00:15:44] Police institution itself defends that a
[00:15:47] list be made, right? Do you believe that this type
[00:15:50] of uh, divergence
[00:15:54] could be avoided? Oh, this is very important for us, Flávia,
[00:15:58] we have been talking about this issue for a long time, because we are used to
[00:16:01] fighting crises, the fire, right? Uh, putting out the
[00:16:05] fire, the fire today. "We are dealing
[00:16:09] specifically with, we want to deal with the
[00:16:12] causes, and the cause of distrust regarding the
[00:16:16] leadership of the federal police is directly linked to the way
[00:16:19] the director general of the federal police is appointed, who does not
[00:16:23] have a mandate. So we defend that there should be a mandate, a mandate that
[00:16:27] passes through governments chosen by a
[00:16:30] list, the criteria of who can be on this
[00:16:34] list, let's put it in the law, police time.
[00:16:38] Uh, work already done, courses and preparations already
[00:16:42] attended, uh, let's put the criteria and
[00:16:45] then the delegates indicate to the government of the day who are
[00:16:49] the most prepared delegates to occupy
[00:16:52] the leadership at that moment. The President of the Republic, within
[00:16:56] his popular sovereignty, uh, chooses. For
[00:17:00] us, this model is the model that would cause less damage to the
[00:17:04] image of the Federal Police, especially in these moments of crisis, because when... there is no
[00:17:07] crisis, when there is no investigation involving government opposition, it is a super
[00:17:11] respected institution, the institution is respected and does not
[00:17:14] cause any problems, no one distrusts it. Now, as the police is always conducting investigations that
[00:17:18] involve politicians, that involve political
[00:17:22] and economic power, it is necessary that society looks at the police and
[00:17:25] does not distrust anything, absolutely nothing, neither closeness to the
[00:17:29] government, nor opposition to the government, nor opposition to those who are not
[00:17:33] in government. The police is a government police, not a state police. That's what I was going to ask
[00:17:36] you, sir. Is it a government institution or
[00:17:40] a state institution? It is a state institution, it is not an
[00:17:44] institution that serves any government or
[00:17:48] opposition. The political world must stay away, it must be
[00:17:51] impartial, follow the technical protocols. We are an institution of
[00:17:55] more than 80 years, we have established protocols, uh,
[00:17:59] for decades, we improved our
[00:18:02] our practices because the
[00:18:06] judiciary said it was... that it could lead to nullities, criticism from the
[00:18:09] population, the police is very mature to do its work, we need
[00:18:13] protection, we need protection of the mandate, of the triple
[00:18:16] list, of autonomies, autonomy,
[00:18:19] investigative autonomy, functional, administrative,
[00:18:23] budgetary, financial, why not? A police with this importance that
[00:18:26] it has, that every year there is an election, it says, the federal police will decide the election,
[00:18:30] it does not have these protections, we do not want to decide elections, we
[00:18:34] want to do our job, regardless of who. is in
[00:18:38] government or disputing the government, therefore a state institution, this
[00:18:41] autonomy will emphasize this issue, right? That's
[00:22:27] about the functions, uh, the
[00:22:30] Federal Police institution and we know that there are
[00:22:33] federal police officers who work alongside the judiciary in the
[00:22:37] Federal Supreme Court. In view of this whole crisis, Minister
[00:22:41] Gilmar Mendes made a proposal that we
[00:22:44] no longer have military personnel and federal
[00:22:48] police officers working within the offices, but this
[00:22:51] function, this work is already very old. How does the association
[00:22:55] receive this proposal from Minister Gilmar
[00:22:58] Mendes? In the advice of the
[00:23:01] ministers, there are several professionals, there are members of the
[00:23:05] AGU, substitute judges themselves who
[00:23:09] come up to help, federal police delegates at this
[00:23:12] moment, other professions, they
[00:23:15] use, they bring their professional knowledge
[00:23:18] to help in the... advice of the minister, uh, the delegates have always
[00:23:22] done this, what they discovered now is that the fault
[00:23:25] lies with the delegates for any type of activism of the supreme court,
[00:23:29] how long has judicial activism been discussed in the supreme court
[00:23:32] or anywhere else? There are no delegates with them, so it's us
[00:23:36] who have become the cause of any
[00:23:40] excess of the Federal Supreme Court. The
[00:23:43] Supreme Court ministers, they who were chosen for such an important position,
[00:23:47] are they so susceptible to...
[00:23:50] interference from federal police delegates? So it seems to us that
[00:23:54] this measure aimed at a category, also at the military, in this
[00:23:57] abstract way is discriminatory against our profession
[00:24:01] and the presence of a federal police officer is important because they have
[00:24:05] knowledge of the things that are being investigated, of the conduct, I think
[00:24:08] mainly because they have knowledge
[00:24:11] of the investigation part and criminal
[00:24:14] law itself, it helps the minister to understand, he is not obliged, the ministers are not obliged to
[00:24:18] understand all areas in depth, so these people,
[00:24:22] not only the delegates, but others,
[00:24:25] Federal Supreme Court to make the most
[00:24:28] appropriate decisions, and another thing, the minister is not obliged to have
[00:24:32] delegates there, he just needs not to summon them, if he summons them, it's because it's
[00:24:35] important for them, it would even be a way to, uh, interfere in the autonomy
[00:24:39] of each cabinet, if the minister wants professional A,
[00:24:42] B or C to have it, for us as a category it seems
[00:24:46] uh, very discriminatory towards us
[00:24:49] and... they are placing a responsibility on us that does not exist, where is
[00:24:53] the proof that the delegates who are in the Federal Supreme Court are making
[00:24:57] interventions and investigations in the Federal Police, these are insinuations that one or
[00:25:00] another throws out there and that we from the National Association of Federal Police
[00:25:04] Delegates vehemently repudiate even the
[00:25:07] claim that there may be a supposed
[00:25:10] directed leak, as we said previously in the first block,
[00:25:14] that information about investigations is being leaked, a leak can occur with
[00:25:18] any professional, any... anyone with any type of
[00:25:22] training can cause a leak, if
[00:25:25] it is investigated, if it is concluded that professional A
[00:25:29] or B is responsible, but to conclude that
[00:25:33] there is a leak because there are delegates there is reckless, the federal
[00:25:37] police acts independently, what is the position
[00:25:40] of the more than 2,000 delegates who are
[00:25:44] linked to this association when a crisis like this happens?
[00:25:47] It is to reaffirm this action?
[00:25:50] We are 2,400 delegates linked to the DPF. Our position is
[00:25:54] unanimous in the understanding that the federal police does a
[00:25:57] state job, a technical job, very well done,
[00:26:01] reconhecido pela sociedade. "nós precisamos das proteções das
[00:26:04] autonomias da PEC 412 de 2009 que
[00:26:08] que necessita de alguns ajustes, mas ela ser quais são as alterações que
[00:26:12] essa proposta traz, ela traz autonomia financeira e
[00:26:15] orçamentária, autonomia administrativa, financeira e orçamentária que
[00:26:19] é paraa polícia, polícia federal possa eh construir
[00:26:23] seu orçamento e mandar pro congresso nacional aprovar, sem os cortes do
[00:26:27] governo federal, porque o governo pode controlar inclusive tirando recursos
[00:26:30] né, eh financeira. de não ter contingenciamentos
[00:26:34] né, eh, a
[00:26:37] administrativa para que o diretor geral possa montar a sua equipe sem passar
[00:26:40] pelos escalões mais altos do governo, hoje porque hoje um diretor, ele
[00:26:44] the director general is appointed by the president and the other
[00:26:48] directors are appointed by the director general, but the name must have the approval of the
[00:26:51] Planalto, general coordinators, superintendents and directors, all
[00:26:55] of them need the approval of the Planalto
[00:26:58] and can even be vetoed for political reasons, it has
[00:27:02] already happened. So, we want
[00:27:05] this administrative autonomy,
[00:27:08] obviously the investigative autonomy, so that
[00:27:11] no one can exert any type of pressure on
[00:27:15] those conducting investigations, then this choice of the director general
[00:27:18] would come from a list, we have already talked about this before, but it would come from a
[00:27:22] list that the delegates themselves would vote on
[00:27:25] also, they would indicate, sorry, that's the word, who will be on this
[00:27:29] list, put in the law what the criteria are, if they
[00:27:33] fit they can be on the list,
[00:27:36] the delegates send it to the president, these are our most
[00:27:40] qualified professionals to fill
[00:27:42] the position of director general of the federal police at this time, he
[00:27:46] chooses among them, I even miss
[00:27:49] Flávia, in this electoral debate
[00:27:52] of the moment, candidates talking about this subject,
[00:27:56] because the candidates say "I am in favor of the independence of the federal police,
[00:28:00] I am in favor of the autonomy of the federal police", but what
[00:28:03] autonomy are they talking about? Is it the autonomy they will give when
[00:28:06] they are in office depending on what is being investigated,
[00:28:10] or the autonomy in the federal constitution, in the
[00:28:13] laws? And it has been a long time since this proposal has been in the national congress, a long
[00:28:17] time, a long time. I even ask
[00:28:20] Record and the other media
[00:28:23] to include these questions in the
[00:28:27] electoral debates that we will have in the future so that the candidates can
[00:28:31] express their understanding regarding the federal
[00:28:34] police, otherwise in the next government we will have the same problems that we are
[00:28:38] having now, uhm, and it ends up preventing an
[00:28:41] instability in the institution, as happened overnight recently now, right?
[00:28:45] Certainly, instabilities now, there were instabilities in
[00:28:48] past governments, we have already had a president of the republic in the
[00:28:52] past being investigated by the federal police, we had in the
[00:28:56] past government changes of
[00:28:59] superintendents in the federal police under pressure from the federal government. Now we
[00:29:03] have these suspicions again, so we understand that this
[00:29:06] protection system could avoid all these
[00:29:10] problems, so that at least it would be much
[00:29:13] better than the current system, which has already proven
[00:29:15] to be deficient and causes problems for the
[00:29:41] postcards faces extreme weather
[00:29:43] conditions, a landslide hit the parking lot of
[00:29:47] Mount Fuji in Japan. Some employee vehicles were
[00:29:50] partially buried after
[00:29:54] region. The incident happened this Thursday, on the last day
[00:29:58] of the official climbing season of the volcano. This year, the period
[00:30:02] was marked by torrential rains, images
[00:30:05] released by authorities and by official guides show
[00:30:09] the access roads and trails covered by a dense fog
[00:30:12] and battered by the rain. We'll be
[00:30:16] back soon with another edition of JR24 hours here on Record
[00:30:19] News.
[00:30:23] Offered by Bradesco Empresas
[00:30:25] businesses open an account for your
[00:30:27] company.
[00:30:40] positive women offered by
[00:30:43] team and positive women together we go further
[00:30:47] i20 discover the car with an
[00:30:49] upgrade in everything you
[00:30:52] dreamed of.