RT — New Order
20261011 103000 UTC
501 transcript segments
Google Speech-to-Text API Automatic Transcription (Chirp)
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] certain politicians have drawn so much attention to this
[00:00:03] story? well, unfortunately, there's a trope
[00:00:07] of in the western in the NATO countries, and the trope is that Russia is
[00:00:10] untrustworthy, that Russian, the Russian government is incompetent, it
[00:00:14] doesn't look out for its people, and so they're going to play into that
[00:00:18] trope, they're going to play into that narrative and say they're not being honest with us and they're
[00:00:22] being
[00:00:23] of irresponsible, so it's I think
[00:00:24] of it's part
[00:00:24] of the
[00:00:25] of the public relations attack NATO-wide against um against
[00:00:28] Russia, I think one
[00:00:29] of the reason. that um our the leaders
[00:00:32] of the United States right now, particularly the political leaders are um
[00:00:36] trying to um focus the attention
[00:00:38] of the American people on this particular outbreak is because
[00:00:42] in um here in America there's a lot of political unrest um just
[00:00:45] before the um midterm elections, people are very
[00:00:49] upset about the economics, about foreign
[00:00:52] of policy, of um of there are a lot of people supported President Trump who feel as though that
[00:00:56] he did the opposite of what they wanted, they wanted into foreign wars. and
[00:01:00] focus on uh US economy, so I think that this may be an
[00:01:04] opportunity for at least for a brief period for
[00:01:08] um the Trump administration to try to get um people
[00:01:11] who are angry and focus on high gas prices and inflation to
[00:01:15] maybe focus on something else for a while, I think that is at least
[00:01:33] of
[00:01:34] of
[00:01:38] a The global financial architecture is under siege with the
[00:01:42] bankruptcy
[00:01:43] of the Unipolar
[00:01:44] a financial order on full display in Bangkok, the IMF and World Bank
[00:01:47] a are to meet to enforce more debt slavery on the global south, passing the bill
[00:01:51] for a western engineered energy crisis onto the world's poorest
[00:01:55] populations. I'm afshan Ritancy and you're watching New
[00:01:58] Order.
[00:02:09] Today marks three years since US state department and
[00:02:12] of US AID funded cutouts created a
[00:02:14] of targeted Western engineered financial media blitz fronted by the Financial
[00:02:18] Times sabotage India's key energy and port
[00:02:21] infrastructure. It even tried to
[00:02:23] of slander Dubai, but things are changing in India and AI
[00:02:27] counteroffensive begins at the World AI Summit in Bengal. laru to
[00:02:30] counter silicon valley monopolies and secure a multipolar digital
[00:02:34] future from the sudden back channel extraction of captured US mercenary
[00:02:38] smuggling military drones into India's borders to FBI
[00:02:42] dispensing of cooperation with Indian law enforcement. Washington's
[00:02:46] hybrid operations against New Delhi are escalating. Rubio's
[00:02:49] state
[00:02:50] of department just launched a rapid response NGO war chest to synchronize
[00:02:54] judicial overreach, information warfare and kinetic
[00:02:57] subversion. Modi for his part
[00:02:59] of hosted the first. anniversary for a trade agreement
[00:03:01] of along with celebrating 25 years in public office and his external affairs
[00:03:05] minister Jay Shankar toward Gana Code Devoir and
[00:03:09] Ethiopia as fighting intensified in the horn of Africa, but it's still
[00:03:13] the wars on Iran and Russia through Ukraine where India has now proposed a
[00:03:16] three-part truth as well as the Gaza genocide let alone the potential
[00:03:20] loss
[00:03:21] of the bee in bricks that focuses the
[00:03:23] of mind for the new world order. New Order Zahar Khan will be on later
[00:03:27] to answer your questions posted on social. media bo with me
[00:03:30] today again is Trump's former national security advisor and
[00:03:34] the US ambassador to the UN. John Bolton pleaded guilty
[00:03:38] in june to violating the
[00:03:40] in espianage act. He tried to weaponize against Wikileaks founder Julian
[00:03:44] Assange. Today he awaits sentencing of up to five years in
[00:03:48] prison and 100 hours community service. He joins me now from
[00:03:52] Washington DC. Ambassador John Bolton, welcome to
[00:03:55] New Order. So, Modi celebrating a trade deal.
[00:04:00] with uh more western European
[00:04:03] of countries, of isn't the it clear that
[00:04:05] of India needs to sign trade deals with other
[00:04:08] countries given the fact that US
[00:04:11] trade with India, there's not going to be a trade deal any time
[00:04:15] soon? well, it's a a big mistake for the United
[00:04:19] States globally to have announced all
[00:04:21] of these tariffs last year, uh, and I would say that
[00:04:25] the tariff issue has been handled
[00:04:29] with India, particularly... morally for a variety of reasons, some of it having to do
[00:04:33] with the Russian aggression in Ukraine, some of it for other reasons, but
[00:04:37] I think any government has to look out after its own
[00:04:40] self-interest, and in this case pursue tariff deals where they
[00:04:44] can, it's it's a missed opportunity for the United States, I think there
[00:04:48] are a lot of
[00:04:49] of possibilities of of for closer US-Indian relations
[00:04:53] on political economic matters generally, and to have these tariffs
[00:04:56] out there as an issue really just
[00:05:03] a makes it... were difficult, and by the way, increases taxes on Americans, I mean that's one
[00:05:04] of the fundamental things wrong, this is not simply
[00:05:07] injurious to India, it harms Americans too, that that's why
[00:05:10] Tarris shouldn't be. normal tool of
[00:05:14] diplomacy? mean, that's widely accepted across
[00:05:18] the US political spectrum ahead the midterms arguably, but do you think
[00:05:22] it's important now for India, especially after the bricks Delhi
[00:05:25] declaration signed by the UAE, where I'm speaking to you from, from
[00:05:29] Iran, Russia, China, the India should
[00:05:33] have no limits partnership with China in the face
[00:05:37] these kinds of threats. I mean, sure, Trump
[00:05:40] may be, who knows, he may be impeached. after uh he loses the senate,
[00:05:44] but uh, India can't rely on the United States as being uh
[00:05:48] any kind of partner given that uh India's discovered
[00:05:52] the kind of acts it holds over its head. Well, I think you're talking
[00:05:56] about Trump rather than the United States. Trump is an aberation, there's no doubt about
[00:06:00] it, we don't we don't need to see any more presidents like
[00:06:03] that. So I think it's a question, unfortunately as is
[00:06:07] for many countries around the world of kind of gritting your teeth to get through
[00:06:11] it, I wouldn't rush. the china's arms, I think their interest
[00:06:14] in expanding their hegemonic capabilities all around their
[00:06:18] Indo-pacific is very real, and and in close relationship
[00:06:22] with Russia, where they already have a partnership without limits, and
[00:06:26] we're we're seeing the effect of that in Ukraine right now, so this
[00:06:30] this combined threat the China, Russia access I think
[00:06:33] is serious strategic issue, and not one
[00:06:37] that the declarations from these diplomatic conferences have going to
[00:06:41] change, yeah, but in India's close relations obviously
[00:06:45] with Russia too, would you say the single most important thing you
[00:06:49] did as national security advisor in that region and in that
[00:06:52] sphere was to split apart any kind
[00:06:55] of closeness between India
[00:06:59] and China, this is crucial tenent of US
[00:07:02] policy, and this isn't just since Trump obviously, I mean you
[00:07:06] know the BJP discovered they were being bugged by the United
[00:07:10] States through Edward Snow. under the Obama
[00:07:13] administration, well leaving leaving
[00:07:17] aside those sorts of things, look,
[00:07:19] I i think this is
[00:07:20] a question of strategic reality, and India
[00:07:23] has the geographic reality of having a land
[00:07:27] border with China, across which there have been numerous
[00:07:31] military incidents over the years and as to which there's still
[00:07:34] considerable disputed territory. China has a
[00:07:38] lot that it's looking at now, but it's probing all around its
[00:07:41] perif.
[00:07:50] their most recent hot war was of consequence was
[00:07:54] with Vietnam in 1979, border
[00:07:57] clashes along
[00:07:58] the line of actual control with India repeatedly,
[00:08:02] you this is not a nice quiet neighbor
[00:08:04] and I think India understands
[00:08:08] that fully and hopefully we can get over the
[00:08:11] disruptions the... administration revive the Asian
[00:08:15] security quad with Japan and Australia and uh and and talk
[00:08:18] about matters of mutual interest. Yeah, but I mean the China
[00:08:22] Vietnam conflict was a long long time ago and you can't name many more
[00:08:26] conflicts China's been fighting since then,
[00:08:30] and also it's not just that you might ask why they're building up
[00:08:34] their military in one the largest increases in in
[00:08:37] capacity in history and a very rapid rate
[00:08:41] and Bill. a force of nuclear weapons
[00:08:44] that in very short order as these things go, perhaps by
[00:08:48] 2030, will be roughly comparable to the Russian
[00:08:51] arsenal and the United States arsenal, making it a tripolar
[00:08:55] nuclear world and not a bipolar nuclear world, and and could that
[00:08:59] arming be defensive given the threat from the United States,
[00:09:03] obviously in this region we've had the war on Iran
[00:09:07] ongoing, we don't know whether by the time this is even being broadcast
[00:09:10] Trump will have decided to use... tactical nuclear weapons, or with
[00:09:14] his partner Israel, yeah, what did you make the US-Israeli
[00:09:18] targeting of India's chabahar port in Iran,
[00:09:22] was that to damage Indian trade roots? no, and I
[00:09:26] i think there's effectively zero chance of anybody using nuclear weapons
[00:09:30] against Iran. the reason it's so important in my view to
[00:09:34] change the regime in Tehran is precisely to prevent this
[00:09:37] government of medieval authoritarian religious
[00:09:41] fanatics from endanjuring their neighbors, the the
[00:09:45] hit on the Indian ship came after warnings, after
[00:09:49] repeated warnings to stop because
[00:09:51] there was a blockade, and not aimed at India
[00:09:55] or anyone else, and the standard operating procedure for the navy is to say,
[00:09:59] if you don't stop, we will target your engine room, you have 15 minutes to
[00:10:03] evacuate, so the the the captain of that
[00:10:07] ship, I think holds a considerable
[00:10:09] responsib facilities. owned by the
[00:10:13] Indian government, I'm not talking about ships, why was that
[00:10:16] attacked, and the rail lines, which are so important obviously for
[00:10:20] the north south transport corridor, which I assume
[00:10:24] US National advisor opposed? well the the the issue
[00:10:28] here is dealing with the regime in Iran and
[00:10:31] the specifics depend on the
[00:10:35] circumstances we're facing. I'm sorry, I thought you were referring to the
[00:10:38] ship that that was fired on by the US
[00:10:42] Navy and that I think was regrettable, but as I said in large
[00:10:46] measure the responsibility the captain. one the things the
[00:10:49] navy says in hailing ships
[00:10:53] is this bloccade will be in. forced by the entire united
[00:10:57] states navy, almost other captains
[00:11:00] disregarded that, yeah, but I'm talking
[00:11:04] about Indian defense a world where the United
[00:11:08] States attacks important, vital strategic
[00:11:12] trade corridors that India
[00:11:14] is is part of, amids and in the context of
[00:11:17] 25% tariff threats and all the rest of it, you can
[00:11:21] understand.
[00:11:25] signing declaration, well we'll we'll see about
[00:11:29] that,
[00:11:29] I i think that's what it's been so far, but this is in the context of dealing with Iran, which
[00:11:33] I think the Indian government's well aware of, I mean we had last week Larry
[00:11:37] Wilkerson, former chief of staff at the state department under Colin Powell who said
[00:11:41] that Trump had been, I mean you're laughing, tell me why you're laughing, he he
[00:11:45] said he'd heard from people in the circle of Steven
[00:11:49] Miller and others that Trump had given that yahoo the go ahead for
[00:11:53] nuclear weapon, well look there's there there's a lot a lot of
[00:11:56] speculation there, i wouldn't try and answer Larry Wolkerson if my life depended
[00:12:00] on it, why is that? not reliable
[00:12:04] source, former chief of staff at the US state
[00:12:07] department, not reliable
[00:12:16] always preferred the imec corridor, which of course
[00:12:20] goes through Israel, of course Israel the hugely
[00:12:23] unpopular in around the world in the United States,
[00:12:27] in the United States amongst amongst American
[00:12:31] Jews, let alone everywhere else, after the genocide
[00:12:35] in Gaza, so what was the point the imec corridor,
[00:12:38] be
[00:12:39] now when Israel is hated, and Iran
[00:12:42] clearly because of what's happened, has
[00:12:46] a incentive to get nuclear weapons
[00:12:50] for the first time, look, Iran has been pursuing nuclear weapons
[00:12:54] for 35 year. not
[00:12:57] true under any agency, that's obviously factually incorrect, it
[00:13:01] is absolutely true
[00:13:03] and said never should have been
[00:13:07] director of national intelligence, she's she's totally unqualified for
[00:13:11] that job, and the the longstanding nature
[00:13:15] the Iranian nuclear weapons program was demonstrated by
[00:13:19] materials brought out by the Israelis in their raid on the archive
[00:13:23] in Tehran in the spring of 20. 18 documenting it way
[00:13:26] back to its origins, yeah, but
[00:13:29] that's that's not what I was really asking, I was asking about the fact that
[00:13:33] and I think if you were national security advisor to come and he right now,
[00:13:37] you'd be saying get nuclear weapons as fast as you can, given the
[00:13:41] circumstances, what would be the purpose of an imac corridor
[00:13:44] trade root as an alternative to the
[00:13:47] NSTC north trade corridor, if there won't be in
[00:13:51] Israel very soon, well I think Israel is going to be... around lot
[00:13:55] longer than the current regime in Tehran, which has demonstrated it
[00:13:59] remains committed to getting nuclear weapons, they have been trying
[00:14:03] for years, they have hidden facilities from the international
[00:14:06] atomic energy agency, they barred the IAEA inspectors from
[00:14:10] key locations, military bases
[00:14:13] like they don't care now, I don't think
[00:14:17] they care at all, those those have been destroyed, those have been
[00:14:20] destroyed and they are still building at pickaxe
[00:14:24] mountain. which they think will be a more secure site, so even as much
[00:14:28] their nuclear program lies in ruins, they continue to do
[00:14:32] work for that program to go on. well, clearly they're incentivized now for
[00:14:36] a balance of power because Israel has nuclear weapons. Israel's
[00:14:40] had nuclear weapons for a long time, although they've never admitted it, the other
[00:14:43] governments in the region have learned to live with that, and the
[00:14:47] idea that that somehow this was
[00:14:50] defensive again is belied by what the
[00:14:54] Iranians own. archive said is as demonstrated when the
[00:14:57] Israelis made it public several years ago. ambassador bolden, we'll continue
[00:15:01] after the break. keep watching, new
[00:15:03] order.
[00:15:11] what if everything you think you know is only part the
[00:15:14] story. bold economic moves, high stakes battles on the world
[00:15:18] stage, war and peace, the very
[00:15:22] future of America. the headlines are loud. The
[00:15:25] debates are fierce, now it's time for closer look,
[00:15:29] know the policy, understand the impact, America first,
[00:15:33] Scotty NV.
[00:16:19] You're watching New Order. Ambassador Bolton, we were talking about uh,
[00:16:23] Israel and its existence. Uh, back to Bricks, back
[00:16:27] to India, what do you think the fact that no one
[00:16:31] really cares anymore about the threat of US sanctions?
[00:16:35] Um, I actually don't know what you respond. was
[00:16:38] to the lance at publication that US sanctions have
[00:16:42] killed 38 million people between 1971 and
[00:16:46] 2021 is the estimate in the esteemed british medical
[00:16:49] journal the launset, no one cares about the sanctions anymore, the US
[00:16:53] can threaten India all it likes, it will continue trading
[00:16:57] with russia, well it depends on
[00:17:00] the sanctions, it depends on how they're being enforced and and what
[00:17:03] effect it has on the targets, i think in
[00:17:07] the case of Iran right now, the
[00:17:10] blockade on oil exports and any imports into Iran
[00:17:14] is having a very significant effect. I think the government
[00:17:17] is ever ever more susceptible to being overthrown from
[00:17:21] within, the economy, which is already in bad shape is in worse
[00:17:25] shape, so these are the kinds of sanctions that are actually
[00:17:28] enforced that
[00:17:29] really sanctions are proven
[00:17:33] time and time again not to work, and we're talking about a country with the largest.
[00:17:38] 'I don't biggest call manufacturer in this region
[00:17:41] from where I'm speaking to you, and journalists who've been there recently
[00:17:45] tell me that those who opposed their government now support their
[00:17:48] government, you do understand the rally around the flag effect the
[00:17:52] illegal bombing, I don't think that's the effect, no,
[00:17:55] I don't, I don't think that's the effect it's having inside Iran, and by the way, speaking of sanctions,
[00:17:59] I think the government the UAE has done exactly the right thing
[00:18:03] by saying that they will
[00:18:04] not allow Iran to to'. trade
[00:18:08] or or launder their finances through UAE financial
[00:18:12] institutions, I think that's going to have and is having a significant
[00:18:16] negative impact on the regime's ability to stay a float
[00:18:19] financially, and yet the UAE and Iran were in the same
[00:18:23] table of course in Delhi signing that declaration, and back
[00:18:27] to those sanctions on Russia, which shows about what significance it's going
[00:18:31] to have, it it reminds me of my days back in the United Nations when the General
[00:18:35] Assembly routinely passed resolutions. that went from the
[00:18:38] floor the general assembly right into a file never to be reviewed
[00:18:42] again, because you firmly believe that bricks is what
[00:18:46] over? mean, looking at towards Brazil and the uh
[00:18:50] what's been happening, we're looking forward to a runoff, which some
[00:18:53] believe will see Bolsonaro's son, I'm not sure whether you
[00:18:57] met him, I know you met his father, may
[00:19:01] become uh the leader of Brazil, the be in bricks, what do
[00:19:04] you think that will mean for bricks? Well I,
[00:19:08] I think I think that would result in a pretty significant change in Brazil's policy, but what
[00:19:11] I'm referring to is not changes of administrations at the top,
[00:19:15] but fundamental interest. Bricks itself uh is
[00:19:19] composed of countries whose basic interests are uh contrary to
[00:19:23] one another, certainly in the case of Brazil and Russia, they're energy
[00:19:27] exporters as opposed to India and China, which are energy
[00:19:30] importers, uh, they've got different approaches and different
[00:19:34] priorities, that's what drives national policy. "and uh
[00:19:38] and and ultimately that's what will prevail, well
[00:19:41] some people would say that it's can be more synchronized, I mean there was a
[00:19:45] thing called OPEC,
[00:19:46] I know the UAE have just left it, but they were all exporting oil at the same
[00:19:50] time, you know - what what do you uh
[00:19:54] make of accusations that the United States has been
[00:19:57] interfering in the election the B in Bricks,
[00:20:01] Brazil, because you were accused of that famously, you called it the Troika of
[00:20:05] Tyrany in Miami in 2018." ahead of
[00:20:08] Bolsonaro senior taking over, you met him in Rio,
[00:20:12] you you praised the judge, judge Moroum of
[00:20:16] course was exposed by Wikileaks
[00:20:18] as as someone who was
[00:20:22] involved with the United States institutions ahead the prosecution of
[00:20:26] Lula, President Lula, well
[00:20:30] the torque of tyranny, I was referring to was Cuba and Nicaragua and
[00:20:33] Venezuela and not intended in any way to have an impact.
[00:20:37] on the then Brazilian elections, I don't how it's going to come out uh,
[00:20:41] I did meet the President Bolsonaro before he was inaugurated, we we were
[00:20:45] in his his modest home in Rio, he he made breakfast
[00:20:49] for me and his incoming foreign minister and he had very good
[00:20:52] relations with uh with the Trump administration, whether his son will
[00:20:56] be elected or not,
[00:20:58] I don't know,
[00:20:58] I don't, I don't think it basically helps the United States to
[00:21:02] interfere in truly democratic elections. Trump himself
[00:21:06] proved that he was so antipathetic toward
[00:21:10] Justin Trudeau and his party in Canada that he
[00:21:13] helped Trudeau's successor Mark Carney get elected,
[00:21:17] which Trump has found uncomfortable, so I think the... prudent thing to do for an American
[00:21:21] president uh is just to be quiet and say, we're going to respect
[00:21:25] the outcome, we work for whomever is victorious. yeah, but there have been
[00:21:29] cases recently that the Indians haven't been
[00:21:32] liking over perceived attempts
[00:21:36] to destabilize India, I mean not just since the time the
[00:21:40] bugging the BJP itself, but in terms
[00:21:43] of other elements of US strategy, you were national security
[00:21:47] advisor, you know that you interfere in... other governments in
[00:21:50] fact USAID was is instrument of that, is
[00:21:54] it not? certainly is not, I
[00:21:58] was an official of USAID in the early Reagan
[00:22:01] administration, Mark, the first time I visited India in fact in
[00:22:05] 1982 or 83, I think I think
[00:22:09] the dismantlement of USAID by the Trump administration has been a big
[00:22:13] mistake, ultimately it's going to be replaced one way or the other. I would say
[00:22:17] during at least my tenure as national security advisor, I thought we
[00:22:21] had excellent relations with India, we worked uh
[00:22:25] closely together on uh handling
[00:22:29] a an Indian response to an act of terrorism committed across the
[00:22:33] border from Pakistan, I think that was appreciated at
[00:22:36] the time, and I thought back then Modi and Trump had gotten off to a
[00:22:39] good relationship, but marred perhaps only by the fact that
[00:22:43] Modi shook Trump's hands so hard that uh it it left him
[00:22:47] kind of gasping, which
[00:22:48] I think shows how... strong Mr. Modi really is. Well,
[00:22:52] the US Organization of Crime and Corruption Reporting Project,
[00:22:56] I mean, isn't that also funded by USAID and
[00:23:00] as the State Department? You don't believe these sorts of institutions created by the
[00:23:04] United States are there to advance US
[00:23:08] strategic power, obviously the Indian
[00:23:10] government say never heard of that institution.
[00:23:14] It's call the OCC, the Indian government has just said it's being used
[00:23:18] to target state. indian companies, mean that is
[00:23:22] rather the way uh us policy works, isn't
[00:23:25] it? well, again since I've never heard of that
[00:23:29] institution, I can't really say, no, no, most American companies
[00:23:32] frankly are heavily resistant to being used in that
[00:23:36] way, and we can talk about that, but it's hardly
[00:23:39] like
[00:23:41] chinese companies, this
[00:23:43] is a US cutout organization used to
[00:23:47] malign different state align companies.
[00:23:50] state align companies within India,
[00:23:53] Indian state companies. Well, it may, it may be the least
[00:23:57] known US cut out in history, I've never
[00:24:00] all the more dangerous, some might say, so you're just not, so you
[00:24:04] don't think, you don't think the destabilization of bricks
[00:24:08] countries is going on at all
[00:24:11] by the CIA, USAID, the state department,
[00:24:15] they're not involved in trying to destabilize bricks countries that align
[00:24:19] themselves. to particular bricks partners, I mean
[00:24:23] obviously Iran is member of bricks as is Russia, as is
[00:24:26] China. Well, I wouldn't comment on what we were doing covertly
[00:24:30] any case, but it would the short answer to the question is it depends on the
[00:24:34] country, I wish we were doing more to destabilize the Iranian
[00:24:37] government. I think it's very close to collapse right now, and I'd like to
[00:24:41] see us succeed in that in as short a period of
[00:24:45] time,
[00:24:49] world.
[00:24:49] most see it like this, clearly India doesn't, because India has close relations
[00:24:53] with Iran. I mean, do is it your
[00:24:57] view that there are people in the American
[00:25:00] establishment, at the state department in the Pentagon who really
[00:25:04] believe India is going to stop importing Russian energy? Is
[00:25:07] that serious idea? Well, I think
[00:25:10] I think I think it would be worth
[00:25:12] considering
[00:25:17] the economy, whether supporting the economy.
[00:25:20] of a country that supplies China with
[00:25:23] high-end weapons systems that could be used against
[00:25:27] India, over the long-term really is in India's
[00:25:30] geostrategic interest. So you think nothing the handshake
[00:25:34] between Modi and Shin Ping? You think it represents
[00:25:37] nothing? I i think it represents very
[00:25:41] clear eyed view that that India has to look out for its
[00:25:45] own national interest uh and and and that doesn't surprise
[00:25:49] me at all. I think the... real question is understanding what
[00:25:52] China's near-term and long-term objectives are,
[00:25:56] and I think it's unmistakable that what China seeks in the near
[00:26:00] term is hegemony along its free and over the
[00:26:03] longer term the Germany in East and South Asia, but
[00:26:07] China will always be treated preferentially to India by the
[00:26:11] United States, as we see from the tariffs and from the fact that China
[00:26:15] can import as much Russian oil as it wants, the Graham act sanctions I'm
[00:26:19] going to hit China, as I said before, that's the that's the Trump aberation
[00:26:23] at work, I mean I think I've said any number of occasions, I
[00:26:26] think the disproportionate treatment of India makes no sense
[00:26:30] whatsoever, not strategically and not even from Trump's own
[00:26:33] perspective of his relationship with
[00:26:36] moty. Ambassador Bolton, thank you, glad to
[00:26:40] be with
[00:26:40] you.
[00:26:46] Trump called John Bolton Waco John Balton, somebody's not
[00:26:50] wako, is social media queen Zara
[00:26:53] Khan. I will take that for the
[00:26:59] on these wars a sign we should work on using natural resources. instead like
[00:27:03] water, sun, wind. Well, I mean, Israel, is
[00:27:07] not only trying to steal the gas from Gaza, it's trying to create an
[00:27:10] ethno-supremacist situation. Um, I think
[00:27:14] from what John Bolton was saying, you can kind of see it's not destroying Russia just
[00:27:18] for resources, like the ones you just mentioned, it's something
[00:27:22] more visceral, and if you were to use the sustainable
[00:27:26] way, as Poly Pop socket is saying, what would happen to all the
[00:27:30] profits, corporate profits, the war pays. five oil super
[00:27:34] majors have
[00:27:34] made 48 billion dollars out the closure the straight of oumus, best quarter
[00:27:38] since Russia went into the Dombas after NATO killed
[00:27:41] 14,000 uh neoliberal treaties anyway have a
[00:27:45] something called the investor state dispute settlement scheme and
[00:27:49] clauses so if you started to use water, sunshine and wind they'd be going,
[00:27:52] you got to compensate us companies for the fact you're not using us, you're using the
[00:27:56] sunshine and corporation monopolies can anyway
[00:28:00] own the water and there are ' mechanisms for the
[00:28:04] corporations to take over
[00:28:12] has asked, does netan yahu think newking Iran will get him
[00:28:15] reelected? um, at the time of according,
[00:28:19] no nuclear strike, but as Larry Wilkerson said, and John Borton was
[00:28:23] laughing at him, what did he mean when he said about the former chief of
[00:28:27] staff at the US state department, that was his
[00:28:30] exact words, he was trying to ' say it wasn't right, but anyway at the
[00:28:34] time anyway, because Wilkerson said there would be nuclear striking tr but given to go
[00:28:38] ahead, I think the important thing now is uh for the IAA
[00:28:42] to demand immediate access to Israel's nuclear weapons,
[00:28:46] that's the important thing, we don't even know whether Netanyahu is safely guarding these
[00:28:50] nuclear weapons, that's the uh issue more than
[00:28:53] Netanyahu thinking of uh nuking Iran to get himself
[00:28:57] re-elected. This is all the time we have this week, I will be back next week
[00:29:01] with
[00:29:07] follow us on x at new order_tv to ask your questions, we'll keep watching
[00:29:10] India and its global south partners as they create an age of multipolarity,
[00:29:14] see you
[00:29:15] sunday
[00:29:32] the deep. State has its hands in everything. I was in the middle
[00:29:35] of it for decades. When I blew the whistle on CIA
[00:29:39] torture, the deep state turned on me. They ruined my
[00:29:43] life, took away my rights, threw me in
[00:29:46] prison, but they didn't break
[00:29:48] me. I fought back
[00:29:52] and I still do. I'm John Kiriaku, on my
[00:29:56] show, the deep state. I take you behind the geopolitical moves, the color
[00:30:00] revolutions, behind the politics. and the
[00:30:02] politicians, we shine a light on where the deep state is
[00:30:06] hiding,
[00:30:17] now he should have an election, and he can't raise the price of
[00:30:21] oil, it's not enough. Donald Trump says Kief needs a
[00:30:25] new leader, as Washington agrees with Moscow to lift sanctions on imports
[00:30:29] of Russian diesel, that decision is deemed weak by
[00:30:33] and it prompts a Ukrainian delegation to immediately leave the United
[00:30:37] States. The huties warn
[00:30:41] shipping companies and airlines to not enter Saudi airspace and
[00:30:45] this comes after devastating strike on Riyad's main airport, killing
[00:30:49] 12 people and wounding over 300.
[00:30:52] confirmed to RT that they carried out the attack.
[00:30:56] These attacks are Yemeny attacks. We do not do this out of revenge.