RT — New Order
20261011 183000 UTC
496 transcript segments
Google Speech-to-Text API Automatic Transcription (Chirp)
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] cutouts created a targeted western engineered
[00:00:02] of financial of media of blitz fronted by the financial times sabotage
[00:00:06] India's key energy and port infrastructure, it even tried to slander
[00:00:10] Dubai, but things are changing in India and AI
[00:00:13] counteroffensive begins at the World AI Summit in Bengaluru to
[00:00:17] counter Silicon Valley monopolies and secure a multipolar digital
[00:00:21] future, from the sudden back channel extraction of captured US mercenaries
[00:00:24] smuggling military drones into India's borders to FBI
[00:00:28] dispensing of cooperation. with Indian law enforcement, Washington's
[00:00:32] hybrid operations against New Delhi are escalating. Rubia's State
[00:00:36] of Department just launched a rapid response NGO Warchest to synchronize
[00:00:40] judicial overreach, information warfare and kinetic
[00:00:44] of subversion.
[00:00:44] of Modi for his part
[00:00:46] of hosted the first anniversary for a trade agreement along with celebrating 25 years
[00:00:49] in public office and his external affairs minister Jay Shankar toward
[00:00:53] Gana Code divoir and Ethiopia as fighting
[00:00:56] intensified in the Horn of Africa, but it's still the wars on. Iran and Russia
[00:01:00] through Ukraine where India has now proposed a three-part trust
[00:01:04] as well as the Gaza genocide let alone the potential loss
[00:01:07] of the B and bricks that focuses the
[00:01:09] of mind for the new world order. New Order Zahar Khan will be on later
[00:01:13] to answer your questions posted on social media, but with me
[00:01:17] today again is Trump's former national security advisor
[00:01:21] and the US ambassador
[00:01:22] to the UN. John Bolton pleaded guilty in
[00:01:25] of june to violating the espionage act. He tried to weaponize
[00:01:29] against Wikileak. founded Julian Assange, today he awaits
[00:01:32] sentencing of up to
[00:01:33] of five years in prison, 100 hours community service, he joins me
[00:01:37] now from Washington DC. Ambassador John Bolton, welcome
[00:01:41] to New Order, so Modi celebrating a
[00:01:45] trade deal with more western European
[00:01:49] of countries, isn't it clear that
[00:01:51] of India needs to sign trade deals with other
[00:01:54] countries, given the fact that US
[00:01:58] trade with India, there's not... going to be a trade deal any time
[00:02:02] soon? well, it's a a big mistake for the United
[00:02:05] States globally to have announced all these tariffs last
[00:02:10] in year, and I would say
[00:02:11] of that the tariff issue has been handled with India
[00:02:15] particularly poorly for a variety of reasons, some of it having to do with the
[00:02:19] Russian aggression in Ukraine, some of it for other reasons, but I
[00:02:23] think any government has to look out after its own self-interest,
[00:02:27] and in this case pursued tariff deals, where they can
[00:02:31] uh, it's it's a missed opportunity for the United States. I i think there are a lot
[00:02:35] of possibilities for
[00:02:37] a closer US Indian relations on political economic matters
[00:02:41] generally, and to have these tariffs out there as an
[00:02:44] issue really just makes it more difficult, and by the way, increases
[00:02:48] taxes on Americans, I mean that's one
[00:02:50] of the
[00:02:50] in fundamental of things of wrong, this is not simply injurious to
[00:02:54] India, it harms Americans too, that that's why terrorist shouldn't
[00:02:58] be normal... a tool of diplomacy?
[00:03:02] mean, that's widely accepted across the US political spectrum ahead
[00:03:06] of the midterms arguably, but do you think it's important now
[00:03:09] of for India, especially after the bricks Delhi declaration
[00:03:13] signed by the UAE, where I'm
[00:03:15] of speaking to you from, from Iran, Russia, China, the
[00:03:19] India should have no limits partnership
[00:03:22] of of with China in the face
[00:03:23] of these kinds of threats, I mean sure Trump may be, who
[00:03:27] knows, he may be impeached after uh... he loses the senate,
[00:03:31] but India can't
[00:03:32] of rely on the United States as being any kind of partner
[00:03:36] given that India's discovered the kind of acts it
[00:03:39] holds over its
[00:03:40] in head. Well, I think you're talking about Trump rather
[00:03:43] of than the United States. Trump is an aberation, there's no doubt about it, we
[00:03:47] don't we don't need to see any more presidents like that, so I think it's
[00:03:51] a question, unfortunately as is for many countries around the world of
[00:03:55] kind of gritting your teeth to get through
[00:03:58] of it, of I wouldn't rush into China's arms. "I think their interest in
[00:04:01] expanding their hegemonic capabilities all around their
[00:04:04] Indo-Pacific is very real and and in close relationship
[00:04:08] with Russia where they already have a partnership without limits, and
[00:04:12] we're we're seeing
[00:04:13] of the effect of that in Ukraine right now, so this this
[00:04:17] combined threat
[00:04:18] of the China, Russia access
[00:04:19] I think is serious strategic issue, and not
[00:04:23] one that the declarations from these diplomatic conferences have got
[00:04:27] to change, yeah, but I mean India's close." relations obviously
[00:04:31] with Russia too, would you say the single most important thing you
[00:04:35] did as national security advisor in
[00:04:37] a that region and in that sphere was to split apart any
[00:04:41] kind
[00:04:42] a of closeness between India and China, this is
[00:04:46] a crucial tenent of US policy, and this isn't
[00:04:50] just since Trump obviously, I mean you know the BJP
[00:04:54] discovered they were being bugged by the United States through
[00:04:58] Edward Snowden under the...
[00:05:00] administration, well leaving leaving
[00:05:03] aside those sorts of things, look, i think this is a question of
[00:05:07] strategic reality, and india
[00:05:11] of has the geographic reality of having a land border with China
[00:05:15] across which there have been numerous military incidents over the
[00:05:19] years and as to which there's still considerable disputed
[00:05:22] territory. China has a lot that it's looking at now,
[00:05:26] but it's probing all around its periphery against the
[00:05:30] sankaku islands claimed by Japan, against
[00:05:33] Taiwan in the South China Sea. Their most recent hot war
[00:05:37] was of consequence was with Vietnam in
[00:05:41] 1979. border uh clashes along the line of
[00:05:45] actual control with India repeatedly this this
[00:05:49] is not a nice quiet neighbor and I think
[00:05:52] India understands that fully
[00:05:55] and hopefully we can get over the disruptions the Trump
[00:05:59] administration revive the Asian security quad with Japan
[00:06:02] and Australia and and talk about matters of mutual
[00:06:06] interest yeah but I mean the China Vietnam conflict was a
[00:06:10] long long time ago and you can't name many more conflicts
[00:06:14] China has been fighting since then, and
[00:06:17] also it's not just that ask why they're building up their
[00:06:21] military in one the largest increases in in
[00:06:24] capacity in history and a very rapid rate
[00:06:27] and building a force of nuclear weapons
[00:06:31] that in very short order as these things go, perhaps by
[00:06:34] 2030 will be roughly comparable to the Russian
[00:06:38] arsenal and the United States arsenal, making it a tripolar
[00:06:41] nuclear. world and not a bipolar nuclear world and and could that
[00:06:45] arming be defensive given the threat from the United States
[00:06:49] obviously in this region we've had the war on Iran
[00:06:53] ongoing
[00:06:54] we don't know whether by the time this is even being broadcast Trump will have
[00:06:57] decided to use tactical nuclear weapons or with his partner
[00:07:01] Israel yeah what did you make the US-Israeli targeting of
[00:07:05] India's chabahar port in Iran was that to
[00:07:09] damage Indian trade roots and i think there's
[00:07:13] effectively zero chance of anybody using nuclear weapons against
[00:07:17] Iran, the reason it's so important in my view to change the
[00:07:20] regime in Tehran is precisely to prevent this government
[00:07:24] of medieval authoritarian religious fanatics from
[00:07:28] endangering their neighbors, the the the hit on the
[00:07:32] Indian ship came after warnings, after repeated
[00:07:36] warnings to stop because
[00:07:37] there was a blockade, and not aimed at
[00:07:41] India or anyone else, and the standard operating procedure for the navy is to say,
[00:07:45] if you don't stop, we will target your engine room, you have 15 minutes to
[00:07:49] evacuate, so there the
[00:07:52] the the captain of that ship, I think holds a considerable
[00:07:55] responsibility, but this is a Chabaha port facilities owned by the
[00:07:59] Indian government, I'm not talking about ships, why was that
[00:08:03] attacked, and the rail lines which are so important obviously for
[00:08:06] the north south transport corridor, which I assume you
[00:08:10] as national security advisor opposed. well the the the issue
[00:08:14] here is dealing with the regime in Iran
[00:08:17] and uh the specifics depend on the
[00:08:21] circumstances we're facing, I'm sorry, I thought you were referring to the
[00:08:24] ship that that was fired on by the
[00:08:28] US Navy and that I think was regrettable, but as I said in
[00:08:32] large measure the responsibility the captain, one the things the
[00:08:35] navy uh says in hailing ships
[00:08:39] is this blockade will be enforced by
[00:08:42] is the not entire just United States Navy, almost
[00:08:46] other captains disregarded that, yeah, but I'm
[00:08:49] talking about Indian defense a
[00:08:53] world where the United States attacks important, vital
[00:08:57] strategic trade corridors that India is is
[00:09:00] part of, amids and in the context of
[00:09:04] 25% tariff threats and all the rest of it, you you
[00:09:08] can understand
[00:09:10] why bricks is not just diplomats signing a... declaration,
[00:09:14] well we'll we'll see about that, i think that's what it's been so far, but this is in
[00:09:18] the context of dealing with Iran, which I think the Indian government's well aware
[00:09:22] of. I mean, we had last week Larry Wilkerson, former chief of staff the
[00:09:25] state department under Colin Powel who said that Trump had been, I mean you're
[00:09:29] laughing, tell me why you're laughing, he he said he'd heard from
[00:09:33] people in the circle of Stephen Miller and others that Trump had given th
[00:09:37] yahoo to go ahead for nuclear weapon, well look there's
[00:09:41] there there's lot a lot of speculation there, I wouldn't try and
[00:09:45] answer Larry Wolkerson if my life depended on it. Why is
[00:09:48] that? not reliable source, former chief of
[00:09:52] staff at the US state department, not reliable
[00:09:56] source. well, yeah, I presumely you've vetted him
[00:09:59] after he left office. Who knows? you've always preferred the
[00:10:03] imec corridor, which of course goes through
[00:10:07] Israel, of course Israel, hugely
[00:10:10] unpopulated around the world.
[00:10:12] in the United States, in the United States amongst
[00:10:16] amongst American Jews, let alone everywhere
[00:10:19] else, after the genocide in Gaza, so what was the point
[00:10:23] the imec corridor?
[00:10:25] been now director when Israel is hated and Iran
[00:10:28] clearly because of what's happened
[00:10:32] has a incentive to get nuclear weapons
[00:10:36] for the first time? look, iran has been pursuing nuclear weapons
[00:10:40] for 35 years if
[00:10:42] you know that's not true under any agency, that's obviously factually
[00:10:46] incorrect it is absolutely
[00:10:48] true and
[00:10:52] but of
[00:10:53] said national. should intelligence have she's she's totally unqualified for
[00:10:57] that job and the the longstanding nature the
[00:11:01] Irani nuclear weapons program was demonstrated by
[00:11:04] materials brought out by the Israelis in their raid on the
[00:11:08] archive in Tehran in the spring of 2018 documenting it way
[00:11:12] back to its origins. yeah, but
[00:11:16] that's that's not what I was really asking. I was asking about the fact that and
[00:11:20] I think if you were national security advisor to come in right now,
[00:11:24] you'd be saying, get nuclear weapons
[00:11:26] as fast as you can, given the circumstances, what would be the purpose
[00:11:30] of an imec corridor uh trade route as an alternative to
[00:11:34] the NSTC, north south trade corridor, if there won't be in
[00:11:38] Israel very soon? well, I think Israel is going to be around lot
[00:11:42] longer than the current regime in Tehran, which has demonstrated it
[00:11:45] remains committed to getting nuclear weapons. uh, they have been trying
[00:11:49] for years, they have hidden facilities from the international
[00:11:53] atomic energy agency, they bar the ia inspectors from key
[00:11:56] locations, military bases like the
[00:12:00] key, they don't care now, do they? i don't they care at
[00:12:04] all, well those those have been destroyed, those have been destroyed and
[00:12:08] they are still building uh at pickaxe mountain, which they think
[00:12:12] will be a more secure site, so even as much their nuclear
[00:12:15] program lies in ruins, they continue to do work for that
[00:12:19] program to go on, well clearly they're incentivized now for a balance of power because
[00:12:23] Israel has nuclear weapons. Israel's had nuclear weapons for
[00:12:27] a long time, although they've never admitted it, the other governments in the
[00:12:30] region have learned to live with that, and the idea that
[00:12:34] that somehow this was defensive
[00:12:38] again is belied by what the Iranian's own archive
[00:12:41] said is as demonstrated when the israelis made it public several
[00:12:45] years ago. ambassador bolden, we'll continue after the break, keep
[00:12:49] watching, new
[00:12:50] order.
[00:13:10] There's no end in sight over how you're going to continue to destroy the earth. Is the
[00:13:14] case the madness the people? I tried to go to the gym but I'm certainly not ready to
[00:13:18] fight Russia. This is all so absurd. This is third world
[00:13:21] lunacy, brainwashing. likes to
[00:13:25] say we have the tools, why don't we just start with stability and
[00:13:29] business deals? what plan living on man? we have very good
[00:13:33] propaganda in our press here in Europe. i think we don't know the
[00:13:36] aftermath. anytime that you're not allowed to ask questions, you should ask all the
[00:13:40] questions. the more questions asked, the better the answers will
[00:13:43] be.
[00:13:48] look forward to talking to you all. that technology should
[00:13:52] work for people a... robot must obey the
[00:13:56] orders given it by human beings, except where such orders with conflict with the
[00:14:00] first law. show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial
[00:14:03] intelligence. the point obviously is to create
[00:14:07] trust rather than fear. i
[00:14:11] would like to take on various jobs i mean
[00:14:13] with artificial intelligence we are summoning the
[00:14:15] demon.
[00:14:22] robot must protect its own existence.
[00:15:30] You're watching New Order, Ambassador Bolton, we were talking about uh
[00:15:33] Israel and its existence, back to Bricks.
[00:15:37] back to India, what do you think the fact that no one
[00:15:41] really cares anymore about the threat of US
[00:15:44] sanctions? um, I actually don't know what you response
[00:15:48] was to uh the lance at publication that US
[00:15:52] sanctions have killed 38 million people, between
[00:15:55] 1971 and 2021 is the estimate in the esteemed
[00:15:59] British medical journal, the lancert. No one cares about the sanctions
[00:16:03] anymore, the US can threaten India all it likes, it will continue
[00:16:06] trading with. russia: well, it depends on the sanctions, it
[00:16:10] depends on how they're being enforced and and what effect
[00:16:14] it has on the targets? think in the case of Iran
[00:16:18] right now, the blockade on oil exports
[00:16:22] and any imports into Iran is having a very significant effect. I
[00:16:26] think the government is ever ever more
[00:16:29] susceptible to being overthrown from within, the economy, which is
[00:16:33] already in bad shape, is in worse shape, so these are the kinds of...
[00:16:37] sanctions that are actually enforced that
[00:16:40] really
[00:16:43] sanctions that are not sanctions are proven time and time again not to work, we're talking about a country
[00:16:46] with the largest i don't biggest car
[00:16:50] manufacturer in this region from where I'm speaking to you and
[00:16:54] journalists who've been there recently tell me that those who oppose
[00:16:57] their government now support their government, you do understand the rally around the flag
[00:17:01] effect the illegal bombing, I don't think that's the effect,
[00:17:05] I don't
[00:17:06] I don't think that's the effect it's had. inside around and by the way, speaking of sanctions, I
[00:17:10] think the government the UAE has done exactly the right thing
[00:17:13] by saying that they will not allow Iran to
[00:17:17] to trade or or launder their finances
[00:17:21] through UAE financial institutions. I think that's going to have and
[00:17:25] is having a significant negative impact on the regime's
[00:17:28] ability to stay a float financially. And yet, the UAE and
[00:17:32] Iran were in the same table of course in Delhi signing
[00:17:36] that declaration and... back to those sanctions on Russia, which
[00:17:39] shows about what significance it's going to have, it it reminds me of my days
[00:17:43] back in the United Nations when the general assembly routinely passed resolutions that
[00:17:47] went from the floor the general assembly right into a file
[00:17:51] never to be reviewed again, because you firmly believe that
[00:17:55] bricks is what over, I mean looking it towards
[00:17:59] Brazil and the what's been happening, we looking forward to a
[00:18:02] runoff which some believe will see
[00:18:06] Bolsonaro's son. 'I'm not sure whether you met him, I know you met his
[00:18:09] father um may become uh the leader of
[00:18:13] Brazil, the Bean Bricks, what do
[00:18:14] you think that will mean for Bricks? Well, I don't, I think I
[00:18:18] think that would result in a pretty significant change in Brazil's policy, but what I'm
[00:18:22] referring to is not changes of administrations at the top, but
[00:18:26] fundamental interest, bricks itself is
[00:18:30] composed of countries whose basic interest are contrary to
[00:18:34] one another, certainly in the case of Brazil and Russia, their ener'.
[00:18:37] exporters as opposed to India and China, which are energy
[00:18:41] importers, they've got different approaches and different
[00:18:45] priorities, that's what drives national policy,
[00:18:48] and and and ultimately that's what will prevail. Well, some
[00:18:52] people would say that it's can be more synchronized. I mean, there was a thing
[00:18:56] called OPEC and the UAE have just left it, but they were all exporting
[00:19:00] oil at the same time, what, what
[00:19:03] do you make of accusations that the United States?
[00:19:07] has been interfering in the election the bee in bricks,
[00:19:11] brazil, because you accused of that famously, you called it the troika of
[00:19:15] tyrany in Miami in 2018 ahead of
[00:19:19] Bolsonaro senior taking over, you met him in Rio,
[00:19:23] you uh, you praise the judge, judge Morro, of
[00:19:27] course was exposed by Wikileaks
[00:19:29] as as someone who was
[00:19:33] involved with the United States institutions ahead the prosecution of
[00:19:36] Lula, Lula:
[00:19:40] well, the torque of tyranny I was referring to was Cuba, Nicaragua and
[00:19:43] Venezuela, and not intended in any way to have an
[00:19:47] impact on the then Brazilian elections. I don't know
[00:19:50] how it's going to come out. I did meet the President Bolsonaro before he was
[00:19:54] inaugurated, we we were in his his modest home in
[00:19:57] Rio, he he made breakfast for me and his incoming foreign minister,
[00:20:01] and he had very good relations with with the Trump
[00:20:05] administration, whether his son will be, elected or not, I don't know, I
[00:20:09] don't, I don't think it basically helps the United States uh
[00:20:13] to interfere in truly democratic elections, Trump himself proved
[00:20:16] that he was so uh uh antipathetic toward Justin
[00:20:20] Trudeau and his party and Canada that he
[00:20:24] helped Trudeau's successor Mark Carney get elected uh,
[00:20:28] which Trump has found uncomfortable, so I think the prudent thing to do for American
[00:20:32] president uh is just uh be quiet and say we're gonna respect the
[00:20:35] outcome, we'll work
[00:20:36] for whomever. is victorious, yeah, but there have been cases recently
[00:20:40] that the uh Indians haven't been liking over uh
[00:20:44] perceived attempts to uh destabilize
[00:20:48] India, I mean not just since time the bugging the BJP
[00:20:51] itself, but uh, in terms of other elements of
[00:20:55] US strategy, you were national security advisor, you know that you
[00:20:59] interfere in other governments, in fact
[00:21:01] USAID was is instrument of that, is it
[00:21:05] not? certainly is not, I was an
[00:21:09] official of USAID in the early Reagan
[00:21:12] administration, Mark the first time I visited India in fact in
[00:21:16] 1982 or 83, I think I think...
[00:21:20] the dismantlement of USAID by the Trump administration has been a big
[00:21:23] mistake, ultimately it's going to be replaced one way or the other. I would say
[00:21:27] during at least my tenure as national security advisor, I thought we
[00:21:31] had excellent relations with India, we worked
[00:21:35] closely together on handling
[00:21:38] a an Indian response to an act of
[00:21:42] terrorism committed across the border from Pakistan, I think that was
[00:21:45] appreciated at the time, and I thought back then Modi and Trump had
[00:21:49] gotten off to... a good relationship but mard perhaps
[00:21:53] only by the fact that Modi shook Trump's hand so hard that
[00:21:56] uh it it left him kind of gasping which like shows how strong
[00:22:00] Mr. Modi really is. Well, the US organization of crime
[00:22:04] and corruption reporting project, I mean, isn't
[00:22:08] that also funded by USAID and it's the state department?
[00:22:12] You don't believe these sorts of institutions created by the United States are
[00:22:16] there to advance US strategic power.
[00:22:20] the Indian government says never heard of that
[00:22:24] institution, it's call the o-co, the Indian government
[00:22:27] has just said it's being used to target state aligned Indian companies,
[00:22:31] I mean that is rather the way uh US policy
[00:22:35] works, isn't it? well again since I've never
[00:22:39] heard of that institution, I can't really say, no, no, most American companies
[00:22:43] frankly uh are heavily resistant to being used in that
[00:22:46] way uh, and we can talk about that, but it's hardly. well
[00:22:50] this was a US cut, this is a US
[00:22:54] cutout organization used to align
[00:22:58] different state align company
[00:23:00] state align companies within
[00:23:03] India,
[00:23:04] you indian state companies, well it may it may be the least known
[00:23:08] US cut out in history, i've never heard all the more
[00:23:11] dangerous some might say, so you're just not so you don't think
[00:23:15] you don't think the destabilization of bricks countries
[00:23:19] is... going on at all by the CIA,
[00:23:23] USAID, the State Department, they're not involved in trying to
[00:23:27] destabilize bricks countries that align themselves too
[00:23:30] closely to particular bricks partners, I mean obviously
[00:23:33] Iran is member of bricks as is Russia as is
[00:23:37] China. Well, I wouldn't comment on what we were doing covertly
[00:23:40] any case, but it would the short answer to the question is it depends on the
[00:23:44] country, I wish we were doing more to destabilize the Iranian
[00:23:48] government, I think it's very close to... collapse right now and I'd like to
[00:23:52] see us succeed in that uh in as short a period
[00:23:55] of time
[00:23:59] most the world doesn't see it like this clearly India doesn't buse India has close
[00:24:03] relations with Iran I mean
[00:24:08] in is it the your American view that there establishment
[00:24:08] are at people
[00:24:12] the state department in the Pentagon who really believe India is going to stop importing
[00:24:16] Russian energy is that serious idea?
[00:24:20] think i think i think it would be worth
[00:24:23] considering
[00:24:28] the economy, whether supporting the economy of a country that
[00:24:31] supplies china with high-end
[00:24:35] weapon systems that could be used against India
[00:24:38] over the long-term really is in India's geostrategic
[00:24:41] interest, so you think nothing the handshake between Modi and shi
[00:24:45] Jinping, you think it represents nothing? i think it
[00:24:49] represents very clear eyed view
[00:24:53] that that India has to look out for its own national
[00:24:56] interest and and that doesn't surprise me at all, i think the
[00:25:00] real question is understanding what China's
[00:25:04] near term and long-term objectives are, and I think it's
[00:25:08] unmistakable that what China seeks in the near term is hegemony
[00:25:11] along its periphery and over the longer term the Germany and
[00:25:15] East and South Asia, but China will always be
[00:25:19] treated. preferentially to India by the United States, as we
[00:25:23] see from the tariffs and from the fact that China can import as much Russian
[00:25:26] oil as it once, the Graham act sanctions, I'm gonna hit China, as I
[00:25:30] said before, that's the that's the Trump aberation at work. I mean, I
[00:25:34] think I've said any number of occasions, I think uh, the
[00:25:38] disproportionate treatment of India makes no sense whatsoever, not
[00:25:41] strategically, and not even from Trump's own perspective uh
[00:25:45] of his relationship with Modi, ambassador Bolton, thank
[00:25:49] you. glad to be with
[00:25:51] you,
[00:25:57] trump called John Balton, wacko John Balton, someone who's not
[00:26:00] wako is social. media queen Zara
[00:26:03] Khan. I will take that for the compliment that I I'm perceiving it as.
[00:26:07] Absolutely. Poly Pop socket has asked, "aren't these wars a sign, we should
[00:26:11] work on using natural resources instead like water, sun,
[00:26:14] wind. Well, I mean, Israel is not only trying to
[00:26:18] steal the gas from Gaza, it's trying to create an
[00:26:21] ethno-supremacist situation. Um, I think
[00:26:25] from what John Bolton was saying, you can kind of see, it's not destroying Russia just
[00:26:29] for resources, like the ones you just mentioned, it's uh..."
[00:26:32] something more visceral, and if you were to use the
[00:26:36] sustainable way, as polly popsocket is saying, what would
[00:26:40] happen to all the profits, corporate profits, the war pays, five
[00:26:44] oil super majors have made $48 billion dollars out the closure the straight of
[00:26:48] umuz, best quarter since Russia went into the Dombas after NATO killed
[00:26:51] 14,000, neoliberal treaties anyway, have a
[00:26:55] something called the invester state dispute settlement schemes and
[00:26:59] clauses, so if you started to use water, sunshine and wind the... be going,
[00:27:03] you got to compensate us companies for the fact you're not using us, you're using the
[00:27:06] sunshine, and corporation monopolies can anyway
[00:27:10] own the water, and there are mechanisms for the
[00:27:14] corporations to take over sunlight, so it's a
[00:27:18] good idea, but needs a bit more work, bit more work,
[00:27:22] and joevit has asked, does netan yahu think nuking Iran will get him
[00:27:25] reelected, um, at the time of recording,
[00:27:29] no nuclear strike, but as Larry Wilkerson said, 'and John Borton was
[00:27:33] laughing at him, what did he mean when he said about the former chief of
[00:27:37] staff at the US state department that uh what was his
[00:27:41] exact words he was trying to uh say it wasn't right, but anyway at the
[00:27:45] time anyway because Wilkerson said there would
[00:27:47] be nuclear striking trump given to go ahead, I think the important thing
[00:27:50] now is uh for the IAA to demand immediate
[00:27:53] access to Israel's nuclear weapons, that's the important thing, we don't
[00:27:57] even know whether Netanyahu is safely guarding these nuclear weapons, that's
[00:28:01] the uh issue more than Netanyahu
[00:28:05] thinking of uh nuking Iran to get himself re-elected.
[00:28:09] This is all the time we have this week. I will be back next week with more questions a
[00:28:13] non-wacky way. Of course, sorry
[00:28:15] I can't. Thank you. And uh, remember to follow us on exit new
[00:28:18] order_tv. To ask your questions, we'll keep watching. India and its global south
[00:28:22] partners as they create an age of multipolarity. See you
[00:28:25] Sunday.
[00:28:46] I think that this um um hegemonic kind of
[00:28:50] mindset um is um deeply um
[00:28:54] within Donald Trump's personality um he think that the
[00:28:57] American of course is is is still the the greatest and most
[00:29:01] powerful country. a planet and and the United
[00:29:05] States according to his uh him and his followers has
[00:29:09] been short changed by is by his allies so it's
[00:29:12] now um incument upon him to change that
[00:29:16] by maximizing American's
[00:29:18] dominance.
[00:29:34] 'I've spent years in conversations beyond
[00:29:37] borders, some were formal,
[00:29:41] some tense, some
[00:29:42] difficult, but all
[00:29:46] them mattered. They chartered
[00:29:49] India's path and how the world
[00:29:53] responded. Foreign policy isn't
[00:29:56] theory, it is lived in arguments
[00:30:00] in decisions. and in their
[00:30:03] consequences. It's not an interview, it's a
[00:30:07] conversation. Let's
[00:30:10] talk.
[00:30:17] In the headlines here live on RT, Donald Trump announces there's an
[00:30:21] energy cease fire between Moscow and Kiev just day
[00:30:24] after saying Ukraine needs a new leader,
[00:30:28] and while Russia has yet to comment, Vladimir Zelensky is called by surprise
[00:30:32] saying: Kyev will agree if Moscow does the
[00:30:35] same. The hootis claim responsibility
[00:30:38] for series of operations against Saudi Arabia, confirming to RT,
[00:30:42] it was behind Saturday's attack on Riyadh's main airport, which killed
[00:30:46] 12 and left over
[00:30:47] 300. These attacks are Yemeny
[00:30:51] attacks. We do not do this out of revenge or to take vengeance, but rather
[00:30:55] to force the Saudi leadership to accept a comprehensive and permanent peace by
[00:30:59] agreeing.