RT — Sanchez Effect
20261105 063000 UTC
486 transcript segments
Google Speech-to-Text API Automatic Transcription (Chirp)
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] figure in the Senate, for instance, Chuck Schumer,
[00:00:03] he vowed to
[00:00:04] in end the war on around many, many times, well veteran American broadcaster
[00:00:08] Garland Nixon Deutts, however, that will now be a priority for the new
[00:00:12] power
[00:00:13] me on the hill. If you look at it, we can simply
[00:00:16] talk about this particular election, but why did Donald Trump win
[00:00:20] a in a blowout in 2024? He won
[00:00:22] in a blowout because he said he would end to all foreign wars, he called
[00:00:25] himself the peace president, and he built a coalition that was unheard of
[00:00:29] people. "ho didn't
[00:00:30] of even like
[00:00:30] of Donald Trump voted for him, and I personally had people tell me, well, he said
[00:00:34] he's going to end the wars, he's going to address, address inflation, inflation, so
[00:00:38] if you look at the past two elections, 2024,
[00:00:41] in Donald Trump won, it was a blowout, why? because Americans
[00:00:45] opposed our war-like foreign policy, now we have
[00:00:48] of the 2026 mid-terms, which are also a blowout, why? because
[00:00:52] Americans opposed our uh war-like foreign policy,
[00:00:56] the last two elections have been blowouts and both
[00:00:59] of them were the same. issues americans trying to oppose our
[00:01:02] foreign wars and in both instances
[00:01:04] I'm afraid the they will be frustrated in the same way that Donald Trump promised to
[00:01:08] end wars of
[00:01:10] you know various wars when he became president and now it's the Democrats turn Chuck
[00:01:14] Schumer will promise to end the war
[00:01:16] of in whatever he need wherever he
[00:01:19] of of needs to promise to of end it in order to gain power now that he's gained power he's not going to uh make
[00:01:23] any attempt to end the war this war is not about Chuck Schumer and it's
[00:01:27] not about um Donald Trump in the same way. that the Ukraine conflict is
[00:01:31] not about either
[00:01:32] of these, this is about US
[00:01:34] of expansionist imperial foreign
[00:01:35] of policy
[00:01:36] of and attempt to maintain power and higemony. these wars are
[00:01:39] integral parts of this grand
[00:01:42] of chessboard, as the big new verzinski would have say, the grand chessboard
[00:01:46] strategy of uh of of of world domination and
[00:01:49] control. to most Americans, if you ask most Americans, it will
[00:01:53] sound mad and insane, and most people won't believe it, but
[00:01:56] ultimately, if you look at the outcomes, we get a cont these
[00:02:00] kinds of policies, although there is absolutely zero chance
[00:02:04] that
[00:02:06] will take action to try
[00:02:07] of to stop these, generally what the wars, generally what the democrats do is
[00:02:11] they come up with some kind
[00:02:14] of come up with some kind of a plan wherein they kind of create the illusion
[00:02:18] that they're trying to stop the military conflict and they
[00:02:21] a just of blame it on the republicans and say, well we would have, but we didn't have enough votes or
[00:02:25] something like that, well as the US
[00:02:28] of congress raises.
[00:02:30] of questions of about Washington's future approach to the Middle East, Art Charlotte
[00:02:34] Dubinsky has been looking at how Israely spy operations and calls
[00:02:38] for regime change in
[00:02:39] of Iran could be putting ordinary Iranians at greater
[00:02:42] risk. Israel has long been
[00:02:46] in screwing with Iranian society, agents inside
[00:02:50] the country, sleeper cells
[00:02:52] a waiting just to be activated, but now a former
[00:02:56] Mossad chief has opened wide the real of
[00:03:00] dirty tactics that Israel's been using,
[00:03:03] essentially placing
[00:03:05] of ordinary Iranian citizens, the ones that it says it wants to
[00:03:09] overthrow their government in
[00:03:12] in in Tehran in the actual firing line, just take a
[00:03:15] listen to what David
[00:03:17] of Barner of has said about why Mossad
[00:03:20] intentionally released images of its own
[00:03:24] covert operation in Iran back in June in
[00:03:27] 2025, just as the US and Israel were launching
[00:03:31] a war. We wanted to make sure they
[00:03:35] of arrested so many people in Iran that they wouldn't be able to separate the wheat from the
[00:03:38] chaf and would eventually release everyone. Incidentally, that is exactly
[00:03:42] what happened. Well, he went to elaborate saying that
[00:03:47] of 21,000 people were arrested, so no issue if it means that any
[00:03:51] mozard agents managed to get picked up, buse they also managed
[00:03:55] to slip through the net due to this admin
[00:03:58] overload. A few months. later, a former US secretary of state
[00:04:02] was twisting the knife a little deeper,
[00:04:06] me happy new year to every Iranian in the streets, also to every mossad agent
[00:04:10] walking beside them. the Trump administration promised to help any
[00:04:14] Iranian protesters if they took to the streets, they
[00:04:17] did by the thousands, but no assistance
[00:04:21] came. instead, after the unrest was brought back
[00:04:25] to calm by the Iranian authorities, it was
[00:04:28] then the U.S.
[00:04:30] of Israel launched their second war in Iran in
[00:04:34] less than year, thousands upon thousands killed
[00:04:38] as the bombs rain down, and none of that aid that
[00:04:42] was promised came, yet it's those same
[00:04:45] of Iranians that Israel
[00:04:47] of is still encouraging to get out and
[00:04:50] protest, seeing our forces on the
[00:04:52] of ground in
[00:04:53] of Iran and the U.S. military striking its nuclear capabilities,
[00:04:56] ballistic missiles and factories is exactly the kind of...
[00:05:00] operation we aspired to. One thing I have never agreed with is the
[00:05:04] idea that the Iranian regime can be overthrown from the outside. I
[00:05:08] believe
[00:05:08] that is something the Iranian people themselves must do. I know how difficult.
[00:05:12] dangerous
[00:05:12] it is to take to the streets and demonstrate against the regime, but I think the
[00:05:16] regime is a different position today. It's dangerous, coincides,
[00:05:20] but hey, if few hundred or even perhaps few
[00:05:24] thousand people get beaten up or lose their lives, it's
[00:05:28] no skin off his back. The overall mission
[00:05:31] remains the same, bring down
[00:05:34] tiran, and it's a call that we've heard
[00:05:38] over and over from Israeli politicians,
[00:05:42] it's all. the Iranians to bring down their
[00:05:44] government, well, few weeks ago, Israeli prime
[00:05:48] minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has
[00:05:51] encouraged Iranians to rise up over
[00:05:55] and over, was once again suggesting they could do
[00:05:59] so with the help of
[00:06:00] Mossard, only with your humble
[00:06:04] servant, will he be ready to launch an operation that will once and for all
[00:06:08] remove the Iranian threat, and I have already instructed the massad and the IDF to
[00:06:12] topple. and if those warnings don't
[00:06:15] work, they don't worry, Israel has another
[00:06:19] card up its sleeve, this time it's the
[00:06:22] threat of chemical weapons, yes, intelligence
[00:06:26] shared now with the US points to Iran actually considering using
[00:06:30] chemical weapons against its adversaries in the region, and
[00:06:34] that's dividing officials in Washington, is it
[00:06:37] true or is this part of some new kind of pressure campaign by
[00:06:41] Netan? and others for more strikes on Iran,
[00:06:45] so while Israel is egging people to go out
[00:06:49] to the streets to demonstrates, the threats of more
[00:06:53] bombs are looming, the reality being, risk your life
[00:06:57] if you take to the streets to do Israel's bidding, but
[00:07:01] if you do, you may get caught out by the bombs that are
[00:07:04] going to rain down. Okay, Rick is here with a
[00:07:08] special midterms 2026 rap momentarily, then do join me. You're
[00:07:12] in just over 20 minutes for live news, analysis, reaction this Thursday. Your
[00:07:16] companies always appreciated and never take it for granted on RT
[00:07:20] International.
[00:07:56] Rick Sanchez joining us now, it's once a generation to get the kind
[00:08:00] of political energy and movement that you had with Maga,
[00:08:04] because it wasn't just republican thing, it wasn't just a
[00:08:07] right thing, it was a true populist movement that brought in people
[00:08:11] as we've talked about... from the disaffected left and independents
[00:08:15] and libertarians and and environmentalists and those maha
[00:08:19] moms who said finally someone is listening to us, and it
[00:08:23] pulled all this energy a way that was almost like an
[00:08:26] unstoppable force. to watch that become
[00:08:30] fizzle out and dismantle in two years
[00:08:34] is is historically politically sunny, rick
[00:08:37] sanches. i'll tell you, you
[00:08:40] know, to be sitting here, across from Margery Taylor Greene uh having a
[00:08:44] conversation about the pitfalls of our
[00:08:48] government and how little democracy is in our so-called
[00:08:52] democracy is uh incredible uh it's a
[00:08:55] breath of fresh air and what what's really cool is that
[00:08:59] there are people on the left and there are people on the right who are saying the
[00:09:03] same thing and I would like to think and I know it's hard to look
[00:09:07] at it right now but I would like to think that that the that
[00:09:10] the the the the... Thomas
[00:09:12] massification, the Margery Taylor
[00:09:16] Greenification of American
[00:09:20] politics can, hopefully, before I
[00:09:23] close my eyes and leave this earth, come to
[00:09:26] fruition, and they're playing us and they
[00:09:30] play us constantly, and they play us on the left and they play us on the right, and
[00:09:34] they have us arguing about silly things, meanwile the
[00:09:37] important things, matters of war and peace, for
[00:09:40] example, are not being... even addressed or
[00:09:44] discussed or shared with, nor is the truth ever told to the
[00:09:48] American people as uh the former congressman Greene said
[00:09:51] moments ago about the situation for example in
[00:09:55] Ukraine. The American people have seen 400, 500 billion
[00:09:59] dollars their money to go to Ukraine, go to uh
[00:10:02] Egypt, go to uh uh uh Israel, countries
[00:10:06] that have benefits that we don't have. In the United States of
[00:10:09] America, we don't have a working healthcare system. "they
[00:10:13] do and we're paying for it, you know,
[00:10:16] in in in in Ukraine and and and in uh and and in
[00:10:20] Israel, women who get pregnant get maternity
[00:10:23] leave, you got to hope in. United States, your boss gives it to you, if
[00:10:27] not, you're screwed. I mean, we we literally are
[00:10:30] pouring money into countries and into stupid wars that other people are getting
[00:10:34] rich off, but the American people are getting nothing out of it. In the
[00:10:37] end, these are the these are the
[00:10:40] sins that uh, that that that that
[00:10:43] that that seem to bite the most, man, I
[00:10:45] mean it, and I don't know, is
[00:10:49] when you were in Congress, uh, Miss Green, I'm
[00:10:51] thinking as much respect as I have for you. for some the things that
[00:10:55] you're standing forard now uh and you should be respected for
[00:10:59] that uh because you're you're saying the right things and doing the right
[00:11:03] things, did you get a sense that it's
[00:11:06] even possible to stand up against
[00:11:10] the doning, the donor class, the the people who
[00:11:13] literally come to you and say, do this for me
[00:11:17] and I'll do this for you, and could have kept you in office for the rest of your
[00:11:21] life, and you would not have been saying these things that you did now.
[00:11:27] Well, actually, as member of Congress, I introduce amendments to
[00:11:30] defund countries like Israel and Egypt and other uh
[00:11:34] types of foreign aid, and I'll tell you my amendment uh to
[00:11:38] defund Israel only receives six votes and the House of
[00:11:41] Representatives, mine being one them, and part of my floor
[00:11:45] speech uh, trying to defend Israel as I was telling the American
[00:11:49] people and telling my colleagues that Israel has
[00:11:53] state-funded um college. education, they have
[00:11:56] state-funded healthcare, uh, they also, if you're a Christian
[00:12:00] conservative like myself, they have state-funded abortion up
[00:12:04] until birth, and that's not something that I know people
[00:12:08] like me and and many Americans across the country, really want our
[00:12:12] tax dollars going for, we don't want it going towards abortion in America, we
[00:12:15] certainly don't want it going towards abortion in other countries, yet
[00:12:19] every single year my colleagues um
[00:12:22] euphorically uh send over $3 billion
[00:12:26] dollars to Israel and they send this money to Israel
[00:12:30] so that Israel can in turn buy us
[00:12:33] military defense weapons from defense
[00:12:37] contractors across our country. now in Washington DC
[00:12:41] how it's
[00:12:41] sold to members of congress or you know as I was, is they told
[00:12:45] us, oh, this supports jobs in your district and it's important to
[00:12:49] to support our our most important ally in
[00:12:53] the Middle East, and that's how it's... sold to middle to members of congress
[00:12:57] and they say that this is a good use of tax dollars and it's for
[00:13:01] Israel's defense. however, what i told all my colleagues and
[00:13:04] tried to tell the country, Israel is the only country in the middle east that has
[00:13:08] nuclear weapons. we have no need to pro to
[00:13:12] provide defense to Israel when they're the only country that
[00:13:16] has nuclear weapons and it's a complete
[00:13:19] lie to tell the American people and really slap in their face
[00:13:23] that we're going to send your... hardern tax dollars so that
[00:13:27] Israel can can buy us um weapons
[00:13:30] and ammunitions to murder over 22,00 children in
[00:13:34] Gaza and make 70,00 orphans and
[00:13:38] thousands of children who who now have amputated arms and
[00:13:41] legs and I think it's really easy easy if you just bring it down
[00:13:45] to that one granular issue when it comes to kids,
[00:13:49] and I think most Americans have really come there, it's not really about
[00:13:53] anyone's religion and... identity, but when it comes down to
[00:13:57] murdering children and killing their parents and cutting off their arms and
[00:14:01] legs because they were targeted by snipers or american-made
[00:14:05] drones. this is something that America needs to come to terms
[00:14:08] with, and this is part of this referendum on Donald Trump, and it's
[00:14:12] part the referendum on the Republicans who have stood so
[00:14:16] firmly um defending Israel and really what
[00:14:20] these are is crimes against humanity. if democrats do
[00:14:24] take the... probably going to take the house, i think that's pretty safe to say, they may take the
[00:14:27] senate, if they do, it would be a couple of seats, it's probably not going to be
[00:14:31] huge number, does that do you think have an
[00:14:35] effect on the next steps with the war with iran? mean it looks
[00:14:39] like and again it's looked like this romance that we're close to
[00:14:42] deal, that maybe there's a deal, maybe there's something that could get this thing over
[00:14:46] with, or maybe we're just being breadcrummed again leading into the
[00:14:49] election. yeah, i think we're being
[00:14:53] bread crummed again. "I, I, I really don't have any
[00:14:57] faith that the this war is going to end anytime soon. It's
[00:15:01] because Israel wants it to continue. And President Trump
[00:15:05] is uh, and it's it's hard to even understand why,
[00:15:08] continues to do whatever Netanyahu tells him to do, and
[00:15:12] Netanyahu is going to continue to be the leader of Israel after
[00:15:16] these election results. Um, and they still have to work that balance of
[00:15:20] power out over in Israel, nevertheless BB Netanyahu is in
[00:15:23] charge, and so I think..." we will continue to see this war
[00:15:27] go on, as matter of fact, we saw uh our US
[00:15:30] military bombed their um missile defense systems
[00:15:34] just just last night and um It's
[00:15:37] unfortunate. However, what will happen going forward?
[00:15:41] So, if tonight the Democrats win the house, and I really do expect them
[00:15:45] to win by considerable seats, and I think it's very possible that the
[00:15:48] Democrats take the Senate, that will change things drastically. Uh, number
[00:15:52] one, everyone has to understand that whoever wins tonight
[00:15:56] will not take power until January, so we're going to have
[00:16:00] this discussing lame duck session where the members of Congress that
[00:16:04] lost and the senators that lost are still there with their voting. cards
[00:16:07] and they will be voting on government funding that expires on December
[00:16:11] 11th, and they will also be voting to fund the
[00:16:15] NDAA, which is the National Defense Authorization Act, which
[00:16:19] has contained the very controversial section
[00:16:22] 219, in regards to Israel funding and the
[00:16:25] merging the US military and Israeli
[00:16:28] military and intelligent sharing, which if that
[00:16:32] happens, there will be very little transparency for the American
[00:16:36] people going forward.
[00:16:38] now they'll have to fight through that going through December
[00:16:41] and then the new uh nominees that have won their
[00:16:44] races tonight will come in and will be seated in in
[00:16:48] Congress and the House and the Senate early January and
[00:16:52] that's when the balance of power will really shift. we'll see new
[00:16:56] speaker the house which is expected to be Hakim
[00:16:59] Jeffries who mind you by the way has received millions of dollars
[00:17:03] in apec funding and is very loyal to Israel so I don't...
[00:17:07] we'll see a large change uh in the entire Democrat caucus so
[00:17:11] to speak, even though some the new members will be
[00:17:15] more America first um
[00:17:17] and then we'll
[00:17:18] have very weekend Republican caucus in the house.
[00:17:21] now it's the senate is where things get really interesting,
[00:17:25] Ben, because if these articles of impeachment go
[00:17:28] forward, which I believe they will for Pete Hegseth that Thomas Massie has
[00:17:32] introduced, then you could actually see a trial
[00:17:36] in the Senate. "if there's a democrat majority, if there's a Republican
[00:17:40] majority, they won't bring it to a trial. However, if it is
[00:17:43] democrat majority, I think we could see those articles of
[00:17:47] impeachment actually come to a trial in the Senate, and that's where
[00:17:51] things will get very interesting. Uh, Rick, kind of your thoughts on
[00:17:54] what uh, Marger Taylor Green just said about that. I mean, the idea that the
[00:17:58] Senate could actually hold hearings and a trial
[00:18:02] for Pete Hegseth, we we know there are reports that there are members the
[00:18:06] Pentagon." within the pentagon who are gathering information
[00:18:10] in order to make that happen and to present evidence against
[00:18:13] him, do you think that that is more likely as kind
[00:18:17] the jumpoff point than impeachment against
[00:18:20] Trump? well sure, I mean, I
[00:18:24] think Hegseth is going to be used as the
[00:18:28] example of everything that's been wrong with our foreign policy, and I think that
[00:18:31] Marjery is absolutely right, um, I think that to a certain
[00:18:35] extent though, we're probably going to see more... focusing and targeting on Trump
[00:18:39] himself, I think the Democrats are going to try and use this as an example
[00:18:42] to do everything they possibly can to try and humiliate Trump, to
[00:18:46] try and humiliate Mr. Trump's family uh any way they
[00:18:50] can uh while while some people would are obviously argue that Mr.
[00:18:54] Trump has been doing lot of things that most presidents in the
[00:18:58] past would not have done, at least not so outwardly, there are reports that he's
[00:19:02] already made something like $5 billion dollars while he's in office uh
[00:19:06] the democrats are going to try and... bring this out and and
[00:19:09] and
[00:19:10] by by the way, as Marjory Taylor Green, better than anybody in this world will tell you, they're only
[00:19:14] going to be able to get so far, they're only going to be able to have investigations, uh, they're
[00:19:18] not going to be able to override his vetos, they're not going to be able to impeach him, well they will
[00:19:21] impeach him, but they won't be able to convictim so they won't be able to remove them from office,
[00:19:25] so this is just going to be nasty ugly show
[00:19:29] for uh the next couple of years, but
[00:19:32] I i want to do something real quick, I want to put face on something, we can now
[00:19:35] call Virginia for Mark Warner, Mark Warner,
[00:19:39] okay, democrat, been there freaking forever, right?
[00:19:43] Let tell you a little bit about this guy, Warner, this is exactly what we're talking about
[00:19:47] tonight, that's the problem in American politics, so Mark Warner
[00:19:51] has been there forever, he's a multi multi multi multi multi
[00:19:54] multimillionaire, he gets his money from, yeah, you ready,
[00:19:58] Apollo, Goldman Sachs, KKR and
[00:20:01] Blackstone, right, KKR and like Blackstone
[00:20:05] Merce as we like to call the uh chancellor. of Germany by the way,
[00:20:09] so guess what Mark Warner does, you get one
[00:20:12] guess, the maybe the first, because the first two wouldn't count if I gave you
[00:20:16] story, he is right, on the
[00:20:20] banking and finance committee the United States
[00:20:24] as well as the Senate Intelligence committee, oh and
[00:20:28] did I tell you that he's also one the biggest recipients of money from
[00:20:32] apec and Israel lobbies, so this is the problem,
[00:20:36] ladies and gentlemen, this is... what I would be fired for if I was on CNN or
[00:20:39] Fox and I was reporting to you right now, the people who we are watching on
[00:20:43] these maps that you're seeing on all these stations who are being elected
[00:20:47] tonight are going to be doing the same damn thing. over and over again,
[00:20:51] they're on the take, they're literally taking bribes from huge
[00:20:55] corporations and then doing their bidding in
[00:20:58] congress, I mean if if if if these let me just say these again, I
[00:21:02] want you to take these in, Apollo, Goldman Sacks, KKR
[00:21:06] and Blackstone, those four companies together have
[00:21:09] more, essentially net assets than almost every country in the
[00:21:13] world, except perhaps the United States, each one of those has a higher
[00:21:17] GDP, each one of those has a higher... CDP than most the countries in the
[00:21:21] world, and these are the people who buy a guy like
[00:21:25] Mark
[00:21:26] uh Warner so that he can just continue to get elected year and year and year and out,
[00:21:30] then maybe 20 years from now we'll see him a wheelchair being crawled in or be being
[00:21:34] wheeled into uh the senate once again, this is the
[00:21:37] problem, this is the illustration of what is happening in our
[00:21:41] country that somebody has to step in, somebody like a Thomas
[00:21:44] Massy, somebody like a Margery Taylor Green has to step in and just say
[00:21:48] enough, can somebody give a? crap about the people of America once
[00:21:51] again, because it's so obvious right now that our politics
[00:21:55] doesn't. I mean, look, I'm sorry to get a little emotional about this,
[00:21:58] but it just, it's so obvious sometimes and it makes you
[00:22:02] angry, cuz we need to give things back to the people
[00:22:06] the United States and not to these mark warners the
[00:22:09] world. I'm sorry, congressman Greene, I didn't want to steal your thunder
[00:22:13] here, I don't know how you feel about that, but it seems to be these
[00:22:17] are the people you worked with, you know, and this is... they
[00:22:20] do and they're going to and they're going to put heat on
[00:22:23] trump
[00:22:24] with all people everything they're going to accuse him they do
[00:22:28] sorry yeah oh no you're
[00:22:32] right there it's going to take some time to uh for
[00:22:35] democrats to build up their committee hearings in the
[00:22:39] next um session of congress and um
[00:22:43] but they will definitely target the president and his family and his
[00:22:46] administration probably multiple secretaries
[00:22:50] uh and perhaps some members of congress, it'll definitely get
[00:22:54] ugly. let me just,
[00:22:57] but aren't some them mark warner just sins
[00:22:59] bad. whatever as they accuse the president of, and the president may have
[00:23:03] done some things he obviously shouldn't have done, and it looks rotten,
[00:23:06] but what's Mark Warner? what are lot these guys? it's
[00:23:10] just maybe different way of being on the take, but aren't they also just as
[00:23:14] guilty? i think some
[00:23:18] them are, um, some them are just not
[00:23:21] qualified. yes, can you hear me? yeah,
[00:23:24] yeah. yeah, no, I can hear you. I was just wondering what you thought.
[00:23:28] i apologize, we may have a little
[00:23:29] delay. oh, okay,
[00:23:33] no problem. um, yes, there are some members of congress that
[00:23:37] are definitely uh guilty of pay to play schemes
[00:23:40] and i think that may come to fruition.
[00:23:44] um, there's many members of congress that just aren't qualified for the job, and
[00:23:48] then there's many of members of congress. that
[00:23:50] are there for the paycheck and there for the title and and
[00:23:54] unfortunately some the most um senior
[00:23:57] members of congress, the oldest are literally there for like nursing
[00:24:01] care and for their staff to take care them. it's a disaster
[00:24:05] uh, i couldn't believe some the people that i actually served with,
[00:24:09] but going forward in democrat controlled house and
[00:24:13] possibly a senate we will see investigations and we'll
[00:24:17] see investigations into uh the... Trump's family
[00:24:20] crypto business, we'll see investigations into different
[00:24:24] members the administration who are also former members of uh
[00:24:28] Trump's campaign in the past that will be investigated for
[00:24:32] pay to play schemes, um, but it's definitely going to get
[00:24:36] ugly, but the reason why I brought up Pete Hegseth is because
[00:24:40] Congressman Thomas Massy already has introduced articles of
[00:24:44] impeachment on Secretary Hegseth, and there's only
[00:24:48] two signatures left. on the discharge petition that
[00:24:52] will force vote on those articles of impeachment, and
[00:24:55] those democrats will be coming back to Washington next week, those two
[00:24:59] signatures will land, that'll be 2:18, and there will be vote
[00:25:03] held on secretary Pete Hegsessa, so that's why I brought him up to go
[00:25:07] first, and what do you think will be the result?
[00:25:10] yeah, same question, yeah,
[00:25:13] I've, I think it's very likely that he gets impeached in
[00:25:17] the House of Representatives, however, it uh the
[00:25:21] balance of power in the senate will determine whether
[00:25:25] there will be a trial, and the trial is the most important part, um, you
[00:25:29] have to have two-thirds votes in the senate to impeach
[00:25:32] secretary or a president or vice president, and that's a really
[00:25:36] high bar to achieve. however, this war is
[00:25:39] extremely, extremely unpopular, it has been one the
[00:25:43] biggest pressure points in this campaign, and the
[00:25:46] remaining issue is the monab school. there
[00:25:50] over 120 children were killed in bombings
[00:25:54] uh back-to-back bombings as well as as many teachers
[00:25:57] and other adults, and so
[00:26:00] you know if that comes out in trial. in the Senate, um,
[00:26:04] depending on the balance of power in the Senate, depending on the public
[00:26:07] uproar, that's where we could possibly see maybe
[00:26:11] two-thirds vote
[00:26:12] reached. Let ask you this
[00:26:16] one question, which I think you would be an app person to ask this
[00:26:20] to: is there a spit of difference between republican and a
[00:26:24] Democrat?
[00:26:27] Thank you for asking me that. No, there's not much,
[00:26:31] and the... "I call it the political industrial
[00:26:34] complex. You see, it's two silos that are really the
[00:26:38] same, and they have, they wear two different colors, one wears
[00:26:42] red and one wears blue, and they attack each other, and they engage their
[00:26:46] fans, like team sports, like college football, and I'm a big fan
[00:26:50] of college football, so I know what that rooting and fighting is like
[00:26:53] every Saturday watching football games. However, what they've
[00:26:57] done is they've put the American people against each other, and we have
[00:27:01] one very..." important phrase that we all know and hold deer is
[00:27:05] united we stand, but divided we fall, and
[00:27:09] that's what these political consultants are so incredibly good
[00:27:13] at, they are very good at painting the two parties in two
[00:27:16] different ways with social issues that make us fight each
[00:27:20] other, and then the media companies play in and the ads play on
[00:27:24] television and radio and they come in your mailbox and they come to your telephone and
[00:27:28] they even get texted to your phone, but the reality is when it comes
[00:27:32] to... funding, very important funding bills that we vote on, that really
[00:27:36] is the role the house of representatives. the funding is really
[00:27:39] usually very much the same when it's republicans or democrats
[00:27:43] in charge the house of representatives, most of it is
[00:27:47] the same with few little color
[00:27:50] options, and so no, you can look, there's been
[00:27:54] republican and democrat control in the United States of America for
[00:27:57] decades now, and here we have one result, over $40
[00:28:01] trillion
[00:28:01] dollars in debt, foreign war,
[00:28:04] no matter who you vote for and which party is in charge, and dollar that
[00:28:08] continues to degrade to the point where American families can
[00:28:12] no longer survive a single income and people in their
[00:28:15] 20s have no hope of ever owning a
[00:28:18] home. great question, better
[00:28:22] answer, incredible stuff guys, thank you both. rick sanchez, marger,
[00:28:26] taylor, green, that was powerful stuff, we'll talk with you both again later. thank you, thank
[00:28:29] you.
[00:30:32] ranking members the country's security services, graphic
[00:30:36] footage of a savage attack by one such gang is also
[00:30:39] released,
[00:30:54] well as Ukrainian authority seek to prosecute scores of protesters who
[00:30:58] clash with law enforcement after.