RUSSIA24 — Voskresnii vecher s Vladimirom Solovevim
20261012 001000 UTC
507 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] GigaChat, what's written here, with GigaChat, it's
[00:00:03] just 16 times. GigaChat, I passed everything
[00:00:06] automatically, awesome. Let's set a new
[00:00:09] goal. GigaChat, everything is
[00:00:12] simple for you. For those who first used
[00:00:16] neural networks, while everyone was on social media, who
[00:00:20] first started working on the beach instead of in the office, who first
[00:00:23] turned off Wi-Fi because it's faster from a smartphone, for those
[00:00:27] who are always first, Megafon launched the option: Mega
[00:00:30] 5G. So that you can experience a new
[00:00:34] level of speed for the first time. Connect the Mega 5G option on
[00:00:38] your smartphones across the country. Megafon, mobile operator number
[00:00:42] one in speed
[00:03:13] Interesting, interesting, what is happening. I worked
[00:03:17] with air defense,
[00:03:20] amazing guys. At the same time, it so happened that for several
[00:03:24] weeks in a row, in completely different parts of our homeland,
[00:03:27] I work with very different units.
[00:03:30] This week I worked first on the road
[00:03:34] that goes towards Donetsk, which was also difficult to pass
[00:03:38] before. A charming guy, the commandant of the road,
[00:03:41] a new position, yes, he commands the graves, and he
[00:03:45] himself looked, and the guys are fantastic, and
[00:03:48] at the same time, they're such hunters, that is, they
[00:03:52] think, understand, move, catch
[00:03:55] drones, get pleasure from destroying
[00:03:58] them. He determines,
[00:04:01] Hornet, a trifle, we know everything about it, but BP-2 is more complicated,
[00:04:04] it's gasoline, and it's better to approach it this way, and here it's better
[00:04:08] to approach it this way, what interception means do I have, I need to talk
[00:04:11] to the factory workers, and the factory workers are all here, they are competent,
[00:04:15] then we drive with the guys, BUK M3, I can take
[00:04:19] all of this, and here I see, it doesn't matter, and the
[00:04:22] crew, look, how many seconds we can completely
[00:04:25] drive out. You look at the guys,
[00:04:28] moreover, there are adults
[00:04:32] who sat at home, Buryat 50
[00:04:35] years old, sat at home, everything is fine, then
[00:04:39] he says, I feel like I can't,
[00:04:41] it pulls, so he came, they call him
[00:04:44] grandpa and old, and indeed his
[00:04:47] boys are like that, their eyes are burning, they want
[00:04:51] to work, and today you will see
[00:04:54] a fantastic product, our citadel.
[00:04:58] We showed the premiere last week.
[00:05:01] pure pleasure, the crew is young,
[00:05:05] athletic, meaning all the guys are engaged in combat
[00:05:09] martial arts. At the moment, if there is a
[00:05:13] need, they can remove, redeploy,
[00:05:16] move from one point to another, although these are stationary
[00:05:19] installations.
[00:05:21] The economics of war are simply ideal, well, the
[00:05:24] fifties are not the most expensive, if you compare
[00:05:27] them with ZURs, remote detonation, smart, no need
[00:05:31] to manually insert anything, everything is
[00:05:35] so beautiful now, it's a pleasure, and at the same time they are looking
[00:05:39] at other calibers, so that the caliber is larger and...
[00:05:42] development is underway, internal competition between our
[00:05:45] concerns, but look, we are now seeing a completely
[00:05:48] new life, heroic efforts of Yandex employees,
[00:05:52] it's difficult for them, they perfectly understand their responsibility, they
[00:05:56] work day and night, they saved almost all services, and look at the
[00:06:00] speed with which they restore them, they raised taxi
[00:06:03] in a couple of hours, few global companies are capable of this,
[00:06:07] the example of the Sudetes shows that they immediately fall apart, we
[00:06:10] cope and quickly recover.
[00:06:27] and this is a real result, and we can talk about the highest technological level of specialists in the company, therefore, here is a very important point in order to make sure that we understand where our critical objects are, especially in the conditions of modern war, using
[00:06:30] the peculiarity of our boundless, boundless
[00:06:33] nature gave us, immediately understand that
[00:06:36] data centers should be located in the north, in
[00:06:40] caves, naturally. to hide them, that is, to lay for the
[00:06:44] future, understanding that wars will still happen, therefore it is necessary to introduce what
[00:06:47] Vladimir Vladimirovich spoke about, there must be a fully responsible
[00:06:51] person for the territory, to whom everyone obeys. If we understand that critically
[00:06:55] important objects are located in a certain territory, then it is necessary
[00:06:58] to contact our valiant air defense forces, if
[00:07:01] necessary, bring helicopter regiments there, put
[00:07:05] as many citadels there as possible, and not only
[00:07:07] there are enclaves, there is a lot of everything. Not everything
[00:07:11] needs to be taken by missiles. That is, everyone, everyone has their own
[00:07:14] task, therefore, if we approach this competently at
[00:07:18] the state level, help where needed, with
[00:07:22] expertise, analysis, because these are new threats, and no one in
[00:07:26] the world has encountered such things, by and
[00:07:28] large, here it's not about accusing, but helping, building
[00:07:32] new chains, new systems, new
[00:07:35] understanding, not trying to shift responsibility
[00:07:38] onto a neighbor, not trying to
[00:07:42] overestimate, underestimate, retouch a horse to
[00:07:46] make it easier to sell or forget about its existence, no,
[00:07:49] objective clear information, analysis and quickly
[00:07:53] made decisions, at all levels, with
[00:07:56] unity of command, then we can solve any problem, now,
[00:07:59] of course, yesterday's news, but I think it
[00:08:03] shocked everyone, this is what, this is great
[00:08:07] diplomacy, when without unnecessary
[00:08:10] shouting, without fuss. Suddenly,
[00:08:13] a telephone conversation took place and the result of the
[00:08:16] telephone conversation is such that the world just exploded, simply
[00:08:20] exploded, terrible hysteria, but we understand that
[00:08:24] a one-and-a-half-hour conversation
[00:08:27] between the President of the Russian Federation, the President of the United States
[00:08:29] of America, had to be
[00:08:33] prepared by very serious people,
[00:08:36] very precisely calculated, to hit the verified points,
[00:08:40] when everything had to converge.
[00:10:12] We're talking about peace. America allows Russia to export
[00:10:16] diesel. I don't know, it's millions, billions,
[00:10:20] in any case, all of this goes to war against people, against
[00:10:23] Ukraine, against everyone. us, I believe that
[00:10:27] our team is simply being used as a cover, this is definitely
[00:10:30] unfair, this is definitely not partnership-like, this is, in my
[00:10:34] opinion, a weak decision, unfortunately, unfortunately,
[00:10:38] a weak decision by strong partners, well,
[00:10:41] to call Trump weak, that's
[00:10:44] just idiotic. At the same time, one must understand, Trump is not alone,
[00:10:48] he relies, in fact, on public opinion, which
[00:10:52] exists in the MAGA audience. Here's what one of the most
[00:10:55] significant American bloggers currently
[00:10:58] looking at this situation says, as
[00:11:02] Americans see it, pragmatically.
[00:11:05] You know, it really irritates me. We funded Ukraine's war for years,
[00:11:09] now they're using that money to undermine the American
[00:11:12] economy. Diesel fuel already costs more than six dollars a
[00:11:15] gallon, and Trump had been demanding for months that Zelensky stop attacking
[00:11:19] Russian oil refineries because, you know, these attacks
[00:11:23] led to rising prices here. In America, and Zelensky simply
[00:11:27] ignored him. So yesterday Trump made a deal with Putin, and
[00:11:30] Russia agreed to immediately put hundreds of thousands of tons
[00:11:34] of diesel fuel on the market, and then increase supplies. After
[00:11:38] that, the Treasury Department issued a temporary license to accelerate fuel
[00:11:41] supplies. This was supposed to reduce the financial burden on
[00:11:45] American drivers and businesses. And just
[00:11:48] a few hours later, Ukraine attacked an oil terminal in Rostov,
[00:11:52] a high-ranking Ukrainian official stated that they would continue to burn
[00:11:56] Russian oil refineries so that Moscow could not export
[00:11:59] fuel to the US. I mean, we paid for these
[00:12:03] drones. Trump is trying to provide our cars with cheaper
[00:12:06] fuel, and until now I have maintained a neutral position regarding
[00:12:10] the war between Russia and Ukraine, because I have many friends in Great Britain, especially in
[00:12:14] Poland, right on the border, they have many fears about Russia. But I
[00:12:18] am no longer going to remain neutral while Zelensky and Ukraine continue
[00:12:22] to sabotage the wallets of Americans.
[00:14:55] A house in New York,
[00:14:58] a mansion in London, that's one. So
[00:15:01] Zelensky went with this methodology,
[00:15:04] that's one, it didn't work, so
[00:15:07] on Saturday Trump just
[00:15:11] went all out, he couldn't stop. I
[00:15:14] suggest they elect a new leader who could make a deal,
[00:15:18] because Zelensky could have made many deals that for some reason
[00:15:21] he never made.
[00:15:25] If I were president, this war would not have happened at all, it would never
[00:15:28] have started, there were no reasons for this war to start between Ukraine and
[00:15:32] Russia, it started because of incompetence, it shouldn't
[00:15:35] have happened at all, you would not have lost 30% of your
[00:15:39] territory, you lost 30% of your territory, over
[00:15:42] a million people were killed, over 2 million people died on both
[00:15:45] sides, this is a war that should never have started, and
[00:15:49] I believe that it's time for Ukraine to choose a new
[00:15:51] president.
[00:15:53] Critics of the Russian diesel deal say it could prolong the war in Ukraine because
[00:15:57] it gives Putin an economic advantage. Well, I believe
[00:16:00] otherwise: Zelensky could have settled this conflict many,
[00:16:03] many times, but chose not to. This is very difficult. This
[00:16:07] war should not have started, if I were
[00:16:10] president, if the elections were not rigged, I would be
[00:16:14] president, the war would never have started, but he could have
[00:16:17] settled it many times, but he chose not to. We told
[00:16:21] him: do whatever you want with Russia, just don't hit oil refineries,
[00:16:24] because that creates a global problem, and he
[00:16:28] wants to create problems for the whole world, he wants to create problems
[00:16:31] for our farmers and ranchers who need diesel fuel, because Russia
[00:16:35] supplies a significant portion of it worldwide.
[00:16:37] And we told him: do whatever you want, but don't touch diesel fuel, because it's
[00:16:41] a big problem, a big shortage, and what does he do, he goes
[00:16:45] and strikes diesel fuel, he can do whatever he wants, but he
[00:16:48] cannot do that with diesel fuel, because we have a global problem, and
[00:16:52] the problem is caused by a shortage of oil refineries for
[00:16:55] diesel fuel production, and what does he do, he goes and strikes
[00:16:59] oil refineries, I told him: do what you want, don't
[00:17:03] strike oil refineries, there are many targets, don't strike
[00:17:06] them.
[00:17:37] decisively, but I think that the most terrible
[00:17:39] thing, if it could be attributed to
[00:17:42] emotionality, is Musk's phrase, because Elon
[00:17:46] Musk, after looking at all of this,
[00:17:49] suddenly said: "Zelensky
[00:17:53] has gone too far," and then
[00:17:55] confirmed that Ukraine needs a new president,
[00:17:59] and that means it's no longer necessary to go to Musk in the White House and
[00:18:02] say, "Give us permission to strike deep into
[00:18:06] Russia," that's not enough. The Americans said: we will stop
[00:18:09] providing you with intelligence,
[00:18:13] but if Musk wants, he can do it very
[00:18:16] simply, he can not disconnect Ukraine, he can
[00:18:20] not prevent Russia from connecting to
[00:18:22] Starlink, that's where a big
[00:18:26] problem begins, a very big problem, yes, our dawn
[00:18:29] is already rising, but if suddenly
[00:18:32] at some point it returns
[00:18:35] to the front line. With all its
[00:18:38] pros and cons, it doesn't matter, then there will definitely be hysteria.
[00:21:56] Zelensky is calling everyone, he's trying
[00:21:59] to cobble together an anti-Trump coalition, but he
[00:22:02] made a very, very big
[00:22:05] mistake, he sincerely believes that now are the midterm elections,
[00:22:09] which Trump will most likely lose, the question here is how he
[00:22:12] will lose, overwhelmingly, that is, losing the Senate and Congress, or losing
[00:22:16] only Congress,
[00:22:18] although I think that the situation will be much more
[00:22:22] positive for Trump than
[00:22:24] observers are currently portraying
[00:22:28] and polls are showing, but he just doesn't understand that after this, Trump will not
[00:22:31] cease to be President of the United States until the end of his
[00:22:34] term, he will not cease at all, and from
[00:22:38] this position he can unravel Ukraine and
[00:22:41] flatten it, remind Zelensky of everything he did against
[00:22:44] Trump during Trump's first term and during
[00:22:48] the elections.
[00:23:20] Even this announcement has created such a rift in the
[00:23:24] ranks of both America and
[00:23:26] Europe that it's worth applauding, not Donald
[00:23:30] Trump,
[00:23:33] but the supreme commander-in-chief, who conducted
[00:23:36] a delicate, well-calibrated, very
[00:23:40] correct, true diplomatic
[00:23:44] work, without excessive
[00:23:48] publicity, calmly,
[00:23:51] as true, high-level diplomacy
[00:23:54] should work.
[00:23:57] Please! You know,
[00:24:00] we discussed a lot that Zelensky
[00:24:04] would eventually come to this
[00:24:07] end. We, on the one
[00:24:11] hand, understand that the fifth year
[00:24:13] of war today
[00:24:16] is not playing in our favor.
[00:24:50] him in one gate
[00:24:53] with American scope, when the welfare
[00:24:56] of Americans falls, you emphasized
[00:24:59] this very correctly, and Trump, not
[00:25:03] being,
[00:25:06] let's say, a Russia lover, went very
[00:25:09] pragmatically, what does this give our country, it
[00:25:13] gives not only
[00:25:16] a political victory, but also gives...
[00:25:50] will be forced either to resign, or to go to
[00:25:53] elections, but one way or another, I hope
[00:25:56] that the chair of the leader of Ukraine will be
[00:26:00] occupied by another person, a person capable of an
[00:26:04] adequate perception of what is happening,
[00:26:07] responsible for the fate of people, both in
[00:26:11] Ukraine and in Russia, because
[00:26:15] it is necessary to understand that the
[00:26:17] Russian leadership has repeatedly emphasized, and the
[00:26:20] president, that we are ready for a dialogue
[00:26:24] that will be specific,
[00:26:27] substantive, in order to be diplomatic, yes, but
[00:26:31] this dialogue must be based on...
[00:27:04] and he didn't say what he was going to throw, not his satellite constellations, no,
[00:27:08] his patriots, no, his equipment that could
[00:27:11] completely replace the entire range provided by the Americans,
[00:27:15] no, he won't throw it. How? Kautulari will say, don't
[00:27:18] abandon Zelensky, because examples change often, Kautulari
[00:27:22] rarely, that's the point, that is, they can talk, but they can't help,
[00:27:25] a couple of million, where will you spend billions, here there is
[00:27:28] one big one. to stand against the Russians or
[00:28:11] the Chinese, they don't need their huge army,
[00:28:14] huge fleet, they pull
[00:28:18] chestnuts out of the fire with other people's
[00:28:21] hands, at the right moment, we gave
[00:28:25] you these cartridges from the Brussels
[00:28:28] committee, please, give us the territory, and not that,
[00:28:31] and this...
[00:29:02] today found
[00:29:05] a mutual understanding with Trump, for
[00:29:08] our side it is very difficult to overestimate, this is truly
[00:29:12] a revolutionary, epoch-making event,
[00:29:15] and I hope that in the
[00:29:18] near future everything will be done to replace Zelensky,
[00:29:22] because the global financial,
[00:29:25] global, economic crises created
[00:29:29] sometime, but how? How to replace Zelensky, that's the most
[00:29:34] interesting thing, why? Because Americans, I'm not a
[00:29:37] fan, just look at the beauty,
[00:29:41] the NABU belongs to
[00:29:44] Americans, so they can play a truly unique
[00:29:48] scheme, if they accuse Zelensky of stealing
[00:29:51] American money, then given that in America everything is de facto
[00:29:55] extraterritorial, they can open a case in America against
[00:29:58] Zelensky for stealing American
[00:30:00] taxpayers' money. Yes, I wanted to say that, that
[00:30:04] is, there are many different schemes that, and then
[00:30:08] kidnap him like Maduro, of course, of course, the flight
[00:30:11] of the prosecutor general,
[00:30:16] who will suddenly give testimony, yes,
[00:30:19] here is such a beautiful mosaic of
[00:30:23] all this is складывается, that
[00:30:26] Zelensky's hysteria directly without any
[00:30:30] restraint, after all, he is the head of state and should not.
[00:31:02] I think he is a unique person in terms of his
[00:31:05] abilities, and I hope that
[00:31:08] for us this will be the most
[00:31:11] optimal at the moment in the period, very important.
[00:32:45] insulting Trump, all over the public forums, what he
[00:32:48] allows himself, well done, well done, keep it up, I'm sure that
[00:32:52] Trump, when all this lands on his desk, he says,
[00:32:55] this is with our money, these are the ones we've been supporting for so many
[00:32:58] years, hmm, I see.
[00:33:02] Alexander Mikhailovich, I would support your
[00:33:06] assessment that we need to rise a little higher, even than these
[00:33:09] events, because indeed for Trump, November is
[00:33:13] a key date. well, November 3rd, and
[00:33:17] if we look at what has been done, the most important thing has been
[00:33:20] done by our president
[00:33:23] without
[00:33:25] articulating it, but it has been
[00:33:29] made clear that what will happen in America on November 3rd
[00:33:32] is not indifferent, moreover,
[00:33:36] indeed for Trump what happens internally is important, as it always has been for Americans,
[00:33:40] the most important thing is what happens inside America, but the key
[00:33:43] thing is that in this... global fuel
[00:33:46] crisis, after all, no one even
[00:33:49] tried to help Trump,
[00:33:52] and it's not even that he didn't ask, surely, we don't know the story,
[00:33:56] surely he might have talked to someone, but real help
[00:34:00] came from Russia, but I would highlight a very important
[00:34:04] aspect in this help: yes, we
[00:34:07] have our own contradictions, we certainly still have a mass
[00:34:10] of unresolved issues, but our president's decision has, in my
[00:34:14] opinion... another, another very important aspect along with others,
[00:34:17] that this help is provided during
[00:34:21] active hostilities against Ukraine,
[00:34:24] well, against the entire collective West, that is, we
[00:34:27] show the possibility, excuse me, that is, Mark Rubio officially
[00:34:30] declares, well, we are not, it is clear where our sympathies lie, we supply
[00:34:34] Ukraine with weapons,
[00:34:36] and
[00:34:39] Donald Trump says: thank you, Vladimir Vladimirovich, for helping our
[00:34:42] farmers and with diesel. And after that, Rubio
[00:34:46] should say, maybe we are supplying weapons in vain?
[00:34:49] Ukraine interferes with our farmers, and Russia
[00:34:52] understands that the fate of a farmer
[00:34:54] is not indifferent,
[00:34:57] says, so be it, well, it's beautiful, but I mean that
[00:35:01] Russia's potential, despite what is said about it
[00:35:04] everywhere, is such that we
[00:35:07] continue to wage war, develop our own economy, and even
[00:35:11] help America, but it seems to me that this aspect, well, it needs to be
[00:35:14] paid attention to at least, because it
[00:35:17] is important today, based on the fact that today the state Duma
[00:35:21] has the most important document - this is the budget, and we have started
[00:35:25] studying it, I can say one phrase, I will be silent,
[00:35:28] I will pass the floor, there is also a very beautiful nuance here, Zelensky said, everything
[00:35:32] is destroyed, half of Russian
[00:35:35] refinery capacities, I destroyed half, the British destroyed half,
[00:35:38] and the Russians say, yes, well,
[00:35:41] actually we have this much, and
[00:35:45] we have this much more, and we have this much more, so I don't
[00:35:49] know what you destroyed, in which half, but we
[00:35:52] have it, if you need it, we have desktops,
[00:35:56] contact us.
[00:36:00] one can only agree with this, and this is a very important aspect, because speaking about the
[00:36:03] budget today, it is necessary to clearly state that today it is already going through
[00:36:07] committees, respected representatives of the government, in particular
[00:36:11] Anton Germanovich, come to us, and we hear many important
[00:36:15] figures that indeed demonstrate that
[00:36:19] a lot has been done, but we must once again
[00:36:23] state that the current budget is the result.
[00:36:26] obligations, maintaining
[00:36:57] necessary resources for
[00:37:01] defense capability, and so on, and there
[00:37:03] is even a lot for development, but I repeat, this
[00:37:07] is a budget that is connected with the fact that what we earned
[00:37:11] last year, or rather invested last year, this year
[00:37:14] we earned by collecting taxes and excises, now we are
[00:37:17] distributing it, this is my personal position, that I would like to focus on
[00:37:21] this, today it is clear that if we
[00:37:24] want to move forward with much greater
[00:37:28] and intensive rates, then we still need
[00:37:31] to think about changing the model
[00:37:35] of economic growth, economic development in general, where more
[00:37:38] space should be given to macroeconomic planning,
[00:37:42] accounting for goal-setting for the country, but what will we
[00:37:46] return to specific figures now, well, this is actually a question for specialists, to whom in
[00:37:50] which area or which industry, a little more, a little less, they will
[00:37:53] agree on this in the State Duma with the government too, but in my opinion...
[00:37:57] we need to ask the question further and wider, because we hear the president,
[00:38:01] we hear his calls for growth rates, for an economy of high
[00:38:05] salaries, and so on and so forth, and most importantly, sovereignty, so
[00:38:08] the budget and generally sovereignty,
[00:38:11] which we are discussing, implies that the state budget
[00:38:14] is fundamentally different from company's budget, especially
[00:38:18] households, well, let's fix this now, and
[00:38:21] since it's different, let's
[00:38:24] see what characterizes the understanding of a sovereign state?
[00:38:27] In terms of the state budget, it's a set, well, there are many, but one of
[00:38:31] the options, I recently liked, I read somewhere that you can take three
[00:38:34] categories: money, plan, meaning, so
[00:38:38] let's see what money without a plan is, inflation, what is a plan
[00:38:41] without money, dreams, what
[00:38:44] is money, a plan without meaning, its own
[00:38:47] meaning, satisfying
[00:38:51] development model, someone else's goal setting, in this
[00:38:54] sense of our sovereign
[00:39:57] Continuing the conversation about a sovereign state, and its
[00:40:00] difference from any enterprise or household, I want to say that it is a sovereign
[00:40:03] state that has the ability,
[00:40:07] the inherent ability to create new money
[00:40:10] for its own economic development to realize its own
[00:40:14] goals, this is a key thing, neither a household nor an enterprise has such an
[00:40:17] opportunity, only the state, and we understand that such a conversation somewhere
[00:40:21] in America would raise the question: what are you talking about in the sense
[00:40:25] that it is obvious to them, so am I. You mean,
[00:40:27] don't you understand that you can live only at the expense of external
[00:40:31] investments, they would tell me that I understood your hint, I had to
[00:40:35] apologize for saying quite banal things, no, this is
[00:40:38] not, the peculiarity is that these are not banal things for us, who are
[00:40:42] accustomed to perceiving the ruble as a certain function de facto
[00:40:46] of the dollar, this is not us, this is what they tried to impose on us, and many have not
[00:40:49] yet abandoned this completely, that is, such
[00:40:52] Gaidarism conditionally, so this is what I want to fix this
[00:40:56] moment, because when we say: you are fed up with it, already accustomed to
[00:41:00] this expression budget deficit, but many don't like it, let's
[00:41:03] just think that on the other hand, if we look at this action,
[00:41:07] it is an advance payment, a budget advance payment, that is,
[00:41:11] the state advances itself, but it can afford it, and
[00:41:15] the state, moreover, the state, by issuing new
[00:41:18] funds, must do it, because it is
[00:41:21] the state that implements the common development task, or rather
[00:41:24] the development of the common territory, it implements... the development
[00:41:28] of the economic space for everyone, including
[00:41:31] those who are called the private sector, but why do we
[00:41:35] try to solve state problems
[00:41:38] with private ones?
[00:41:40] Yes, they must be involved in this process, but they do not define
[00:41:43] the goal setting, they do not define the key development, but this is what you started
[00:41:47] with, well, of course, they are obliged to protect their enterprises, but we cannot
[00:41:51] implement defense capability through
[00:41:54] the commercialization of this, it looks a bit wild, so returning to
[00:41:58] the fact that a sovereign state can do this, it is also obliged, because
[00:42:02] it is precisely it that covers the entire economic
[00:42:05] space, let's just consider specific
[00:42:08] examples, we often say:
[00:42:29] No, of course not, this is a debate about two economic models, in one of
[00:42:32] which today there is a dominant, unfortunately, we
[00:42:35] have, as it were, a set of internal
[00:42:38] models. providing this service, a set of
[00:42:42] enterprises as shops, that is, I like, for example, or
[00:42:45] no, not enough funds for infrastructure
[00:42:48] development, we raise tariffs, but we don't like it or the
[00:42:52] shipper can't make ends meet, so what
[00:42:56] does he do? Does he reduce freight transportation there or raise
[00:42:59] the price, but each in his own small
[00:43:02] economic space, like some commercial
[00:43:05] shop, yes, they are all right, well, listen, where
[00:43:08] is the state, where are the state tasks?
[00:44:10] all these processes, so that it is effective for the entire
[00:44:13] economy at minimal tariffs, then that will be the answer, we don't need
[00:44:17] this transformation, excluding the state enterprise from
[00:44:21] this chain means that we generally simplify our understanding, there is a certain
[00:44:24] state, it has its own tasks, and there is us, a market economy, nothing
[00:44:28] of the sort, there is a state, it has its own tasks and goals, and an effectively
[00:44:32] functioning state, of course, must use the private sector,
[00:44:36] therefore we always advocate for private state partnership, but for
[00:44:39] priorities. State tasks, for example, agriculture, we recently visited
[00:44:42] an exhibition, a magnificent exhibition at Crocus, equipment was
[00:44:46] presented, now it's Golden Autumn, our prime minister
[00:44:49] spoke there, but there are indeed results, but let's
[00:44:52] be objective, there are not only results, there are some
[00:44:55] concerns that there may be difficulties in price parameters
[00:44:59] and that we won't fully understand exports, I'm not talking about difficulties, we will
[00:45:03] overcome them, but there is a trend, a trend for
[00:45:06] the economy, two quarters, investments are decreasing and there is an overall decrease.
[00:45:10] about 10%, machine builders told us
[00:45:13] that they also have a decrease in investment in production, well, do we ignore this,
[00:45:16] okay, there is a problem, everyone says, well, it's nothing, we'll get through it, they say, we'll get through it, so
[00:45:20] let's help them, what, don't we know that, well, in Russia
[00:45:24] there is also this experience, and these are problems related to
[00:45:28] hurricanes, to solar eclipses,
[00:45:31] earthquakes, but when someone creates problems for you with their own hands,
[00:45:34] and then everyone says, well, there is a problem, we will
[00:45:37] overcome it, maybe first just hit their hands?
[00:46:52] federal loan bonds federal loan bonds are oriented towards
[00:46:55] a differentiated rate, listen, there are enough of these examples around
[00:46:59] the world, so let's also use them, but our task is not
[00:47:02] to discuss the existing budget body, we must
[00:47:06] increase it, let's concentrate on
[00:47:09] a constructive dialogue regarding the revenue side
[00:47:12] of the budget, tomorrow we will approve a new
[00:47:15] budget to fulfill social obligations, let's increase it,
[00:47:18] why are we ashamed of these words, why do we forget that
[00:47:22] there is no other way to involve or attract money into
[00:47:26] the economy, except for loans,
[00:47:29] an advanced movement forward in terms of the budget, we forgot
[00:47:33] about external ones, why aren't there many of these resources, let's
[00:47:36] discuss them and start applying them so that not only the current
[00:47:40] budget, but tomorrow's will contribute to our victory, both on
[00:47:43] the economic front and on the field, why discuss anything
[00:47:46] with you, those who should be discussed, they wrote
[00:47:49] letters to the Navalny brothers in their time. They
[00:47:53] were ready to hold any dialogues with them, discuss, why talk to
[00:47:56] us, we are not interesting to them for conversations, different
[00:48:00] political views, if you'll allow me, only one, they are great, they
[00:48:04] don't comment on anything, their face is like a brick, something immediately like
[00:48:08] Mnogukinfeem to remember commented, how to answer for their past?