TELEARUBA — broadcast
20260811 100000 UTC
355 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:01:40] What excites
[00:02:57] should. I mean this is kind of
[00:03:46] extraordinary ruse. This was the the secret, putting the secret
[00:03:50] in Secret Service. If you but is that
[00:03:52] there tell us about the future of a good thing, right? Like I want the Secret Service to do its job to protect
[00:03:55] the president against threats. Yeah. And I don't know what else he was supposed to say.
[00:03:59] This is a man that's, you know, attempted assassination three times and one of
[00:04:03] them like really, really, really real. I mean, he was shot.
[00:04:06] So I think that even though he's supposed
[00:04:10] to be or America wants to see him telling the truth, you can't in
[00:04:13] regards to security. It's also because is the Qatari gift,
[00:04:17] is the juice worth the squeeze? The amount of money, the effectiveness in
[00:04:21] a crisis. It I think people are looking at it and saying, you know,
[00:04:24] maybe you wouldn't have to do all this if you were just stuck with the stuff you have. As an American, I'm
[00:04:28] glad the president is safe. Yeah, I think that's first and foremost, regardless
[00:04:32] whether or not I agree with him any or everything. In fact, we disagree in
[00:04:36] 100% of things, but I do think there's an there's an element of
[00:04:40] transparency here that needs to happen for the sake of the
[00:04:43] process because if it if it happened to Trump, it could happen
[00:04:47] to a future president. So there's some sort of transparency needs to be added to the
[00:04:51] process. And I'll just say to my Republican friends who
[00:04:54] anytime these things have happened, they make the case for ballroom, all
[00:04:57] these political things that happen that... This is where you separate and you
[00:05:01] say, you know what, we need to like stay out of the politics and deal with the
[00:05:05] reality. But there's also what you're revealing to quote and quote the
[00:05:08] enemy. Um, and this you have to reveal it in order to deal with
[00:05:12] trans transparency and safety to prevent it on the front. That's like the
[00:05:15] Secret Service's job to figure that out. And the rest of the American people in the
[00:05:19] world shouldn't know
[00:05:22] that the we know or the president knew or the
[00:05:25] security knew about the threats. So I mean that's we're showing our
[00:05:29] cards if we do that in my mind. Okay, well, two things. First I want to play for
[00:05:32] you the reporter uh from the Washington Post, the Pentagon reporter
[00:05:36] who sort of explains a little bit more
[00:05:39] context. So let me show you that.
[00:05:43] "my understanding is there was some White House staff that did not know. Uh, this
[00:05:47] was kept close hold in a small group. The C-32
[00:05:50] simply did not show up in flight tracker data at all. Uh,
[00:05:54] at least in the publicly available information we had,
[00:05:57] and and the Air Force One jet landed with the Air Force One
[00:06:01] call sign despite the president not being aboard. That that
[00:06:04] there was a serious shell game of sorts that occurred there
[00:06:08] uh, to keep the president safe. To be clear, the
[00:06:11] Qatari give..." To jet, the reporting was that it
[00:06:15] isn't equipped with missile detection, countermeasure systems of older jet. So they've
[00:06:19] got to fix that up. But here's the last beat I want to talk about, the Justice
[00:06:22] Department then sending out subpoenas to
[00:06:25] reporters, basically trying to force them to
[00:06:28] reveal um their sources on this, which of
[00:06:32] course they had to drop because it was a violation of First Amendment
[00:06:35] rights. Um, why not let it go? Well, let me
[00:06:39] step back. Let's step back for a second. Um, the...
[00:06:42] "the Trump administration, Republicans will reveal what they want to when it comes to
[00:06:45] transparency in the president's threats. We've seen them reveal other threats and
[00:06:49] so I don't know how you separate these two, but I think one of the things we have to
[00:06:53] understand is this is not Iran's Iran's first
[00:06:56] time uh dealing with America and the way they want
[00:06:59] to. Uh just few weeks ago we saw the Minnesota um hack if
[00:07:03] you will, the president waved that off. We've seen them attack water systems across
[00:07:07] the country as a potential threat. Now is this so I think we have to have
[00:07:11] serious transparency." conversation around security of America,
[00:07:14] including the American president. That's that's the point I'm making on transparency.
[00:07:18] This reminds me a little bit of when, and you remember this, of
[00:07:22] when President Bush wasn't allowed to come back on 9/11 and
[00:07:26] everyone was criticizing him for not coming
[00:07:29] back and and fortunately or unfortunately, I was part of that
[00:07:32] work time and and there and he wanted
[00:07:36] to come back, but everyone said he was weak and he, you know, he was trying to
[00:07:40] avoid running the country and all of that. But that's the images of him
[00:07:43] like looking out the window or whatever like he's somehow, but the Secret Service and the
[00:07:47] military actually took over and didn't allow him. So we
[00:07:50] don't know and I'm not sure if we deserve to know if the military and the
[00:07:54] Secret Service were the ones that said you get in the
[00:07:57] catering truck and get to the next place to picture Trump
[00:08:01] volunteering. This is just emblematic I think what we're we're getting
[00:08:04] at of this current moment too. This this conflict and this this this
[00:08:08] conflicting contrast that we have between the president, this Republican uh
[00:08:11] administration. Is president and and some of the norms
[00:08:15] there, but also press freedoms, right? So two
[00:08:18] things can be true. The president who has had several
[00:08:21] assassination attempts, including from Iran, uh can
[00:08:24] uh protect his safety. At the same time,
[00:08:28] this was extraordinary to your point. The fact that the press did not
[00:08:31] know and was told actually that the president was
[00:08:35] on this plane. And that's uh something, and now the attempt to
[00:08:39] punish them for for learning. Um, we're going to talk more about this.
[00:08:42] Relationship in a bit, I want you guys to stay with me, but coming up, we're also going to talk
[00:08:46] about Mayor Mam Doni, because of course, in New York he campaigned on
[00:08:50] taxing the rich. Well, there's a judge that put one of his
[00:08:53] signature policies on hold. So we're going to talk about the
[00:08:57] reality of governing as a Democratic Socialist. Plus, it's
[00:09:00] primary day in Wisconsin. What will voters
[00:09:04] the Democratic
[00:09:05] Party?
[00:09:11] The history of... life, it's right
[00:09:14] here. This is our planet. This is our
[00:09:17] home.
[00:09:20] Wow, the size of this
[00:09:21] animal.
[00:09:26] Water has the ability to absorb, to
[00:09:29] cleanse, to migrate, move, that's nature's
[00:09:31] magic. To see sight like
[00:09:34] this gives you such incredible
[00:09:37] hope. When you put your mask on, you get
[00:09:40] into the water, you've just had this whole world open up to
[00:09:44] you. The ocean is still the greatest
[00:09:47] part of this planet. It's time to start giving
[00:09:51] back. You can wake up every morning with one single
[00:09:54] priority and save the most important place on Earth. Every one of us
[00:09:58] can create change and that starts really young. This is
[00:10:01] ambitious, it's bold, brave, and it's
[00:10:04] necessary.
[00:13:42] It's great to have again the governor, the governor's endorsement, but we have to go earn
[00:13:46] each and every single vote. It is the people, the
[00:13:48] voters that give me confidence, not only
[00:13:52] to win tomorrow, but to win on November
[00:13:55] third. Okay, so the polls open soon in the
[00:13:59] Democratic primary for Wisconsin governor, another Democratic
[00:14:02] Socialist, Francesca Hong, looks to take down an establishment
[00:14:06] backed candidate. Now, three candidates have dropped out of this race,
[00:14:10] including David Crowley, before he rejoined the race and
[00:14:14] got the outgoing governor's endorsement. Hong has spent the
[00:14:17] closing days of her campaign answering for her past
[00:14:19] views, including calls to defund the police, abolish
[00:14:23] the US Senate, and cancel Thanksgiving. So it's up to
[00:14:26] Democratic voters weighing electability versus
[00:14:30] policy. The Democrats didn't get their act
[00:14:34] together to try to figure out who should
[00:14:37] be a viable candidate. What they're calling
[00:14:40] socialist policies aren't necessarily socialist. It's working for
[00:14:44] people. I don't think there's anything wrong with being a Democratic
[00:14:46] Socialist, but she's come up so
[00:14:49] strong, uh that I think she's going to scare people. I
[00:14:53] think that's why you're seeing, seeing maybe somebody who maybe has some
[00:14:56] bigger ideas, some bold ideas that might seem a little
[00:14:59] bit crazy. But it's like, hey, let's give it a
[00:15:02] shot. Let's give it a shot. Okay, so
[00:15:06] group chat is back. Wanted to talk about this for two reasons. Yes,
[00:15:10] Antoine, I will not say moderate Democrat. I know, or no, establishment.
[00:15:14] Establishment is now a slur in the authentic authenticity
[00:15:17] era. But I want to play this for you. Hong was talking about her
[00:15:20] past tweets, and here is how she responded um to
[00:15:24] have to defend them now.
[00:15:27] So I learned then you have some hot
[00:15:30] takes, sometimes bad takes on Twitter, and I let my feelings
[00:15:34] out into the world. And right now, as governor, what I'm most serious, serious about are
[00:15:38] the issues that voters are telling me they want solutions
[00:15:41] for. So can I ask you about this? Because the 2020s were
[00:15:45] a time and the hashtag #activism was a time and
[00:15:48] people were just like defund. Send you like, and it was
[00:15:51] everywhere. And now these same folks are trying to run
[00:15:55] for office and all this stuff is coming back. And how do you handle
[00:15:58] it? Do you say actually I didn't believe that or like she said, hey, they were just
[00:16:02] hot takes. Like help me understand how the progressive
[00:16:06] left is reckoning with its own legacy from the
[00:16:09] 2020s. Well, I think AOC, who was the leader, arguably the
[00:16:13] leader of the the progressive left, uh, you saw her, uh, you saw
[00:16:17] her this week, uh cite one of her colleagues, uh, Chi
[00:16:20] Ose from New York, who said woke one was
[00:16:23] crazy. And I think that's what you're seeing now. You're seeing
[00:16:27] them tack back a little bit toward the middle, right? You see the president
[00:16:31] and Republicans using the progressives
[00:16:34] and this fight between centuries, not established.
[00:16:42] And you see some of the progressive saying, wait a second, maybe we, you know, you
[00:16:45] see her mean Hong saying, do not want to defund the police. I like
[00:16:49] Thanksgiving. When when I saw that interview on
[00:16:53] Sunday, the pestivity in me rose to new
[00:16:56] levels, because I did not, did not think it was
[00:16:59] funny then. I don't think it's funny now because we as a party took
[00:17:03] an unnecessary beating for no reason because people want
[00:17:08] wanted to have this style versus suspect conversation. People wanted
[00:17:11] change and they thought being more combative was the way to
[00:17:15] do it. When I think back to that time and how people spoke to each other online at
[00:17:19] that time, Audit is of people who were searching for political
[00:17:22] relevance, searching for attention, and people
[00:17:25] thought that we our homework is great at the
[00:17:29] same as Republicans. That's not the case. What you say
[00:17:33] and what you do can and will be used against you in the court
[00:17:36] of public opinion. Union, when it comes to Democratic candidates, that does not
[00:17:40] apply to Republicans. So with that being said, in this moment where we're having
[00:17:44] similar style versus substance conversation, now the
[00:17:47] reality is starting to hit. We have to win general elections. We have to win
[00:17:51] outside of New York and blue state primaries. And so you have to make
[00:17:54] adjustments and spiting us. Well, uh, David Axelrod said something kind of
[00:17:58] similar to what you were saying. He said she's a font of Zany liberal faculty lounge
[00:18:02] Exotica. She responded in a tweet saying this way, this is an example
[00:18:06] of how the consultants con class keeps losing
[00:18:09] elections. They're totally clueless. She says I've spent more
[00:18:11] time in kitchens than in faculty lounges. And
[00:18:15] I think this pursuit of people who can who are wage workers, who
[00:18:19] can associate which wage workers continues. Republicans
[00:18:22] in the meantime spending a lot of money in support of her. You've
[00:18:26] got pro-Republican pacts including the Republican Governor's
[00:18:29] association spending money on her so that they
[00:18:32] can face her in November, which they
[00:18:35] the Democrats a bunch of times with MAGA candidates and sometimes
[00:18:39] those MAGA candidates just won. Yeah, but here's what I think, I do think she's going to
[00:18:43] win today, but I also think that she's a much different candidate than
[00:18:47] El-Sayed. I think else um he was on with us a couple weeks
[00:18:50] ago. He actually is a
[00:18:53] communicator. He actually connects with people much differently than she does.
[00:18:57] She struggles with that a little bit more. I think that she's a weaker
[00:19:00] candidate in general, no matter what her views are. But no one's
[00:19:04] talking about the fact, and if I were in Wisconsin today and...
[00:19:07] Democrats, I would be like, go and vote, because who lost in
[00:19:11] Michigan were the polls once again. I mean, they had Al-
[00:19:14] Sayed winning by 10 points. So if you were going
[00:19:18] to support Haley Stevens, you're like, why am I even going to go vote today? Well, I want to
[00:19:22] add that because it comes down to enthusiasm, and I want to play one more thing
[00:19:25] to come to you, Mario. David Crowley, who we said jumped out of the race, came back
[00:19:29] in. You only come back in if you got some numbers somewhere that tell you that's a good
[00:19:33] idea. Here is what he had to say on
[00:19:35] Monday.
[00:19:37] "and so many workers, so many farmers, rural communities, people of color,
[00:19:41] women, students, older folks, you name it, we
[00:19:44] haven't lifted up their voices to be able to be a part of the solutions. And that's what's
[00:19:48] different for my campaign. We've been able to build a type of coalition that's not
[00:19:52] only going to help us conquer on August 11th, but ultimately
[00:19:55] defeat an election denier from becoming our next governor here in
[00:19:59] Wisconsin." So I want to ask you, this Democratic Socialist
[00:20:03] movement has not addressed the issue of older
[00:20:06] black person, black voters or more moderate black voters or
[00:20:10] rural voters. They seem to be talking about expanding the
[00:20:13] electorate, not uh catering to the one that has
[00:20:17] sort of turned out in elections repeatedly. What are you going to be
[00:20:20] watching for? Well, it's exactly that, right? Does
[00:20:23] Francesca Hong, does she run up the numbers in places like Madison,
[00:20:27] right? How does she uh perform in places like Ashkash? David
[00:20:31] Crowley, how he performs in Milwaukee as well. To your point about
[00:20:34] black voters, we saw some of that play out last. last week with Haley
[00:20:38] Stevens over-performance. And if you speak to the to the Crowley
[00:20:42] campaign, that's what they're pointing to. They're saying to your point, Ashley,
[00:20:46] the polls last week were off. If we could overperform there,
[00:20:50] "and again, reaching out to black voters, reaching out to those rural
[00:20:53] voters. One of the things is AI data centers. And he's saying rather than
[00:20:57] eliminate them, let's figure out a way to uh harness some of that
[00:21:01] revenue and help it benefit some of those communities. But Mario, elections are
[00:21:04] about coalitions and constituencies. Yes, we have to have
[00:21:07] strong base turnout both in the primary and the general election. But you
[00:21:11] know else what else we have to have in Michigan and Wisconsin and all these
[00:21:14] battleground states. We have to win over some independent thinkers and we
[00:21:18] have to win over some more moderate Republicans because we have a
[00:21:21] multi-faceted coalition in the Democratic Party. Well, the debate is on
[00:21:25] about what it will take to do that. I want you to stay with me because we are going to talk about
[00:21:29] more of this election. Um, we are going to have Election Night in America
[00:21:32] here on CNN. There's primaries in six states, including
[00:21:36] South Carolina, where the race is to see who will take Senator Lindsey
[00:21:40] Graham's place on the November ballot. Antoine is
[00:21:43] watching that, and I hope he's going to be watching CNN for our special
[00:21:47] live coverage and analysis. Election Night in America
[00:21:50] begins tonight at 7:00 on CNN. You can also find
[00:21:54] that on the CNN app with all our breaking news. And coming
[00:21:58] up on CNN This Morning, this President Trump ordering changes
[00:22:01] to the childhood vaccine schedule. What this could
[00:22:04] mean for you in your family. And then I want to say good morning
[00:22:08] to our viewers in New York City, a live look at
[00:22:10] uptown.
[00:22:20] García Luna, because he is the highest-ranking former public official
[00:22:23] in Mexico to be tried and convicted
[00:22:27] in the United States for drug trafficking. It was
[00:22:30] incredible to be there listening to these
[00:22:34] testimonies and to be able to learn
[00:22:37] exactly how drug cartels
[00:22:40] operate and how they can operate with the
[00:22:43] support, often from government
[00:22:46] officials. Covering a federal trial in the United States is always
[00:22:50] a difficult task. You have to arrive at
[00:22:53] court very early to secure a
[00:22:56] seat inside the courtroom, but also because cameras are not allowed
[00:23:00] to record what is happening in the room,
[00:23:04] so you have to take notes. Imagine 8 hours
[00:23:08] taking notes on everything that is said, everything that happens,
[00:23:12] to be able to report it to you.
[00:23:15] You have 5 minutes, we have
[00:23:19] five things for you, a podcast with the five
[00:23:23] most important topics of the day.
[00:26:32] and influenza among others are no longer recommended for
[00:26:36] all children. Nothing bad can happen from what we're doing. Nothing
[00:26:40] bad can happen. So
[00:26:42] the Trump administration is changing the children's vaccine
[00:26:46] schedule. On Monday, the president signed an executive order that would
[00:26:49] reduce the total number of immunizations. So
[00:26:53] basically instead of 17 shots which are recommended, it would go down to
[00:26:56] 11, dividing the vaccine schedule into three
[00:27:00] categories, and split the Mumps, Measles and Rubella
[00:27:03] shot, known as the MMR vaccine, into individual shots instead of
[00:27:07] just one. Now, there's little scientific evidence to support these
[00:27:11] changes. Broad confidence among Americans and vaccines like the
[00:27:14] MMR shot so far. But for parents, the question this morning
[00:27:18] is what to believe.
[00:27:21] Nothing has changed. The
[00:27:25] science behind vaccines is the same today as it was
[00:27:28] yesterday. The security that we have with vaccine
[00:27:32] safety has not
[00:27:35] changed. The risks that the children in this country face for
[00:27:38] vaccine preventable diseases has not changed. And when you have people in the
[00:27:42] United States in positions of authority that are feeding into
[00:27:45] confusion and fear, that is
[00:27:47] doing no service to those parents.
[00:27:51] Okay, Dr. Chris Parnell, Director of the NWACP Center for health
[00:27:55] equity and public, public health physician. Thank you so much for being
[00:27:58] here. Um, so I remember being a new parent, seeing
[00:28:02] the tray of needles and being like... We need to do all of these at once. And then the person
[00:28:06] would explain and say, yes, help us understand why the
[00:28:09] recommended schedule is what it
[00:28:12] is. Sure, good morning, Audi. I think what's most
[00:28:16] important for those of us in public health and healthcare is to
[00:28:19] reassure the public and
[00:28:22] reassure families and parents that
[00:28:26] vaccines are safe. Vaccines are effective.
[00:28:29] And that decisions around vaccines should be made by
[00:28:33] positions, healthcare providers, and scientists. And
[00:28:37] those decisions should be informed by
[00:28:40] years, decades of rigorous research and
[00:28:44] study. And time and time again, you've heard other
[00:28:47] physicians say it, and I will say it clearly this morning, this
[00:28:51] is settled science. There is no new
[00:28:53] information that suggests we should change the
[00:28:57] vaccine schedule. Okay, well, let me play for you what Trump has to say,
[00:29:01] Chris, because I think that it's actually quite common to hear, hear
[00:29:05] this argument that he's making. So let's give
[00:29:07] people a sample of it and see if they recognize
[00:29:09] it. Large amounts of
[00:29:12] vaccine, large amounts of like vats of
[00:29:15] vaccine are currently pumped
[00:29:18] into your child's body. And I saw this early
[00:29:21] on and I've seen proof of it where they have a vaccination thing that looks like the
[00:29:25] size of a bottle of soda poured into
[00:29:28] a little child's uh
[00:29:31] body. And bad things happen in many cas too many
[00:29:34] cases because this is an explosion. This is an
[00:29:37] epidemic.
[00:29:40] Okay, meanwhile, you had Republican Senator Bill Cassidy, who's a doctor,
[00:29:43] saying this on social media. He says breaking up vaccines will mean
[00:29:47] children have to get more shots to get the same
[00:29:50] protection, not fewer shots, and that it will increase
[00:29:53] hesitancy and make children safe. So help me out, because I'm already
[00:29:57] confused, right? Like first I hear we're getting a lower number of shots, then someone says actually
[00:30:00] it's more shots. Like... What what is the difference
[00:30:03] here? Yeah, I think it's most
[00:30:07] important to first say that babies' immune
[00:30:10] systems are very strong, very smart, and can
[00:30:14] handle the commonly recommended
[00:30:17] vaccine schedule. Children are exposed to
[00:30:20] anywhere from 2,000 to 6,000 immune
[00:30:23] triggering substances that we call antigens every
[00:30:27] day. And before this executive order, children were
[00:30:30] being exposed to 16 65 antigens through
[00:30:34] vaccines, which are like beginner books, right? Priming
[00:30:38] and pumping the immune system to function. so when you change
[00:30:41] that vaccine schedule, when you break, break up MMR
[00:30:45] or you say that flu, or COVID is not recommended,
[00:30:48] you take the commonly accepted vaccine
[00:30:52] schedule and you spread it out. what happens when you spread it out? parents
[00:30:56] are either more likely to forget and to return for multip.