TELEARUBA — broadcast
20261102 073000 UTC
474 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] Republican Party candidates for Trump's party for 2028, for the
[00:00:03] 2028 presidential elections. If Trump loses these
[00:00:07] elections,
[00:00:09] the vice president or Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State or
[00:00:12] who? Well, the first thing I would say is that next Wednesday,
[00:00:16] the Wednesday after the elections, will be the first day of the 2028
[00:00:20] elections, and soon we will see how the
[00:00:24] answer to that question begins to emerge. Rubio and Vance are
[00:00:28] obviously the favorites, and soon we will see their strategies,
[00:00:31] and to my surprise, Vance seems to be
[00:00:34] distancing himself more from Trump, not much, but more than
[00:00:37] Rubio. Rubio is being Trump's silent accomplice,
[00:00:41] especially in foreign policy. He has been very discreet in
[00:00:44] domestic politics. He has spent a lot of time physically
[00:00:47] close to Trump. I wouldn't be surprised if he continued
[00:00:50] to do so. To compensate, he doesn't have Trump's
[00:00:53] aggressiveness or Vance's, but perhaps he wants to give the impression that he is
[00:00:57] more likely to continue with the policies of
[00:01:00] tariffs and others than Vance. Vance has already
[00:01:04] made it clear that he doesn't entirely agree with the war with Iran, and
[00:01:07] he could well start to distance himself in other areas too. That
[00:01:11] is, if this had happened 20 years ago, neither of
[00:01:14] the two candidates would have been considered a defector from the incumbent
[00:01:18] president, but this president is very sensitive, and the
[00:01:21] MAGA universe is very sensitive, even to the
[00:01:25] slightest deviation from what Donald Trump wants, and
[00:01:29] so far we see, we see that Vance deviates a little more than Rubio, and
[00:01:32] that is probably what we will see, at least during the
[00:01:35] first few months after the elections, while
[00:01:38] both try to understand the situation. That
[00:01:42] is interesting, because the general opinion is the bet that Vance
[00:01:45] is the MAGA candidate, Trump's movement, and that Rubio
[00:01:49] is a kind of traditional
[00:01:51] Republican. That's true, and maybe I'm
[00:01:54] wrong, but I think the interesting thing is to observe what they say
[00:01:57] and do now, and what they are
[00:02:00] doing now is, in my opinion, quite different from the image of Rubio as a kind
[00:02:03] of country club Republican and Vance as a more
[00:02:07] combative type. Perhaps those are their personalities, but
[00:02:11] I expect Rubio to really distance himself from the president, and I
[00:02:14] don't see it. How do you see the Democrats for the 2028
[00:02:18] presidential elections, the day after
[00:02:21] these midterm elections, who
[00:02:23] will run for president? Well, I think that
[00:02:26] as of November 4th,
[00:02:44] integrate society.
[00:03:00] he is also a moderate Democrat who also has the potential to be a kind of
[00:03:03] delicate balance in relations
[00:03:05] So, regardless of with Israel. So I suspect that in the first
[00:03:09] few weeks after this election on the Democratic side, it will look
[00:03:13] like a big tent, a big tent of more moderate
[00:03:16] Democrats who can attract large state audiences and
[00:03:20] some leftist-type Democrats. Bernie Sanders
[00:03:23] is too old to run for
[00:03:25] president.
[00:03:30] He represents a district in the House of
[00:03:33] the tension, and we don't Representatives, and we haven't had a member of the House of Representatives who has been president in the United
[00:03:37] States since the 19th century. So I think
[00:03:40] someone will realize that the viable and interesting candidates,
[00:03:43] the potential candidates who are getting a lot of attention, are
[00:03:47] the more moderate ones. Professor
[00:03:50] Stuart, thank you very much for your time. We have to go to a break. When we come back, we will continue
[00:03:54] analyzing what can happen in the crucial midterm
[00:03:56] elections on Tuesday in the United States. Don't go away. Thank you, we'll be right back.
[00:04:18] support to change some things in
[00:04:36] Every night there is the possibility of an
[00:04:39] unfiltered bombing. They should not
[00:04:42] treat our young people like that anywhere.
[00:04:46] Here it is asked, is there freedom of belief in the country? In
[00:04:49] Spain, it is heard that this type of phenomenon is not
[00:04:53] what generates change, they are the expression of a change, and
[00:04:56] it is debated. Its foreign policy will
[00:04:59] 5. And to understand what be like this. Conclusions with
[00:05:02] Fernando from Monday to Friday on
[00:05:05] CNN.
[00:05:09] To understand the world, you need to seek the truth.
[00:05:13] Let's go back to the time when we had to be much more
[00:05:16] human, that's why we follow the facts, wherever they
[00:05:19] lead us, no matter how far we have to
[00:05:23] go, from the internal story, there are new
[00:05:26] statements from President Donald Trump, to an external
[00:05:29] perspective, we delve into the data, ready for whatever
[00:05:33] comes. Lorenzo was shot by an immigration
[00:05:36] agent, we face the world. Is it
[00:05:39] legal for a 3-year-old child to appear alone? Find
[00:05:43] joy in new perspectives and new
[00:05:46] horizons, every day, no matter where
[00:05:50] life takes you, we follow what matters
[00:05:53] to you, we forge a path to truth
[00:05:57] and understanding of the world.
[00:06:25] Everyone would say, well, it's gold, for me, my first medal
[00:06:29] is my bronze medal, so it has a very special
[00:06:32] sentimental value to be the first of my career. I'm very
[00:06:35] happy, it was a race that I really enjoyed. Thank God,
[00:06:38] I got the bronze medal, and with that
[00:06:42] I had a bonus for the other medals. In my mind
[00:06:46] it was, I have nothing to lose and everything to gain. I can
[00:06:49] already get a medal, why not get more? Each one has its
[00:06:53] value, it was a turning point for this competition, yes I can,
[00:06:57] I want more and I'm going for more, no, and well, thank God,
[00:07:01] I got gold, I got silver, and we're going back to Mexico very happy
[00:07:04] with three medals.
[00:07:16] I'm Sale Merghi in Tel Aviv, we are
[00:07:20] CNN.
[00:07:26] Thank you for staying with us. We are analyzing what can happen in Tuesday's elections in
[00:07:30] the United States and what will happen next, because the day after
[00:07:33] these midterm elections the race for the 2028
[00:07:37] presidential elections begins. We have
[00:07:39] with us Michael McDonald, director of the
[00:07:43] U.S. Elections Project at the University of Florida. Let's go with
[00:07:47] him. Professor McDonald, thank you for being with us. Well, all the
[00:07:50] polls indicate that the Democrats will do very well in these
[00:07:54] midterm elections, but how
[00:07:57] reliable are these polls? Because in the
[00:08:00] Brazilian elections last Sunday, they
[00:08:03] messed up. How accurate are these polls
[00:08:06] that predict a Democratic victory on Tuesday in the United
[00:08:10] States? I analyze electoral data, so what I do is
[00:08:14] consider all factors, not just look at polls.
[00:08:17] We can deduce from history that
[00:08:21] Democrats will do quite well in these elections. Generally,
[00:08:24] in a midterm election, when the president's approval is very
[00:08:28] low, the other side has a very favorable
[00:08:31] election year. So we start from there, from what
[00:08:34] we consider the fundamentals. Then
[00:08:37] we analyze the polls and see where they stand, and
[00:08:41] they also seem to suggest that there has been a shift towards more
[00:08:44] Republican states in terms of where the most closely contested
[00:08:48] races are. You don't have to believe me, you can analyze
[00:08:52] the campaigns and see where they send their representatives.
[00:08:56] For example, President Trump went to Mississippi, a traditionally
[00:09:00] Republican state, to campaign and try to
[00:09:03] secure votes for the Republican candidate. That is
[00:09:07] very unusual and would only happen if the
[00:09:10] election race had leaned towards the.
[00:09:21] I also see it in the data, so according to several
[00:09:24] indicators, the election seems to be leaning towards the
[00:09:27] Democrats. Were the polls accurate in
[00:09:30] the 2018 and 2022
[00:09:33] midterm elections?
[00:09:36] Well, yes and no. That is, polls have
[00:09:40] a margin of error. Sometimes they are right, sometimes they are wrong,
[00:09:44] and there is usually a margin of error, but that error, if
[00:09:48] we analyze the long history of polls, sometimes goes in the
[00:09:51] direction of the Democrats, sometimes in the direction of the
[00:09:54] Republicans. In fact, I suspect that right
[00:09:57] now the polls probably underestimate the
[00:10:01] Democrats' chances, and I say this because the
[00:10:04] polls are based on what pollsters believe the 2026
[00:10:07] electorate will be. So the
[00:10:10] polls may be favoring the Democrats. Yes,
[00:10:14] the polls are too optimistic about the
[00:10:17] Republicans. If we make a comparison with 2022
[00:10:21] and think about the electorate of that year, we could think that
[00:10:25] the current electorate in 2026 is similar to that of
[00:10:28] 2022, but that was a good year for the
[00:10:31] Republicans, and this one, according to all the data
[00:10:34] we can analyze, polls, early voting, the
[00:10:38] direction the campaigns are taking, seems to be a very
[00:10:41] good year for the Democrats. So
[00:10:44] if you think the electorate is going to be like in 2022,
[00:10:48] you are making a mistake, a mistake that will favor
[00:10:51] the Republicans, so you are overestimating.
[00:10:58] From what we know about early voting and mail-in voting,
[00:11:02] will there be a high turnout in these elections?
[00:11:06] Yes, definitely. When comparing current turnout with
[00:11:10] that of 2018 and 2022, I see that it is similar to that of
[00:11:14] 2018. This is very significant, as the
[00:11:17] 2018 elections recorded the highest
[00:11:20] turnout in a midterm election since
[00:11:23] 1914.
[00:11:35] Well, I can analyze who is voting right now. It's not
[00:11:39] about polls, but about early voting data, and
[00:11:42] we have data by states with party registrations. I can
[00:11:46] see which party votes more and which less, and I can say that
[00:11:50] Democrats and independent voters, people who do not have
[00:11:53] party registration, are voting at much higher
[00:11:56] levels than in 2022 or 2018,
[00:11:59] but Republicans are either
[00:12:03] very similar to those in 2022 or even
[00:12:06] lower in some states. So we are
[00:12:10] not seeing as much energy among Republicans as among Democrats
[00:12:14] and independent voters. And there's another really
[00:12:17] important point. We have data on race and Hispanic
[00:12:21] ethnicity in a couple of states, and I can analyze
[00:12:24] who votes in that category, and we can see that the electorate
[00:12:28] will be much more diverse than in 2022 or
[00:12:31] 2018. African Americans and Latinos
[00:12:34] in astonishing numbers, two or three
[00:12:37] times more Latinos voting than in 2022 or
[00:12:40] 2018. That's what is happening right now.
[00:12:44] If this trend continues, the 2026 elections
[00:12:48] will have the most diverse electorate we have ever
[00:12:51] had in the history of the United States for a midterm election.
[00:12:55] Wow, tell me something about the day after these elections. Everyone will
[00:12:59] be reading results and especially within the Democratic
[00:13:03] party, seeing how the moderates did and how the
[00:13:06] socialist Democrats did. What should we
[00:13:09] look at to see how that will affect the
[00:13:13] Democratic candidacy in
[00:13:16] 2028? Well, I think the big question we have right
[00:13:19] now is the control of the U.S. House of Representatives. We can see that
[00:13:22] the Republicans have strategically withdrawn
[00:13:26] from some House races, which
[00:13:28] practically guarantees that the
[00:13:32] Democrats will get a majority. The question
[00:13:35] is, how wide will that majority be? If it is very
[00:13:38] narrow, it will make it difficult to govern in the House, but
[00:13:42] if it is larger, it will give the Democrats some room to maneuver
[00:13:45] in their management. In the state, we all want
[00:13:48] to know, as there are many very close Senate races,
[00:13:52] and Republicans currently have the advantage.
[00:13:56] Uh-huh. For Democrats to get a majority in the Senate, according to
[00:13:59] the polls, they need to win some close races in traditionally
[00:14:03] Republican states, and they could do it. The polls suggest
[00:14:06] it's possible. In that case, we want to know if Democrats
[00:14:09] get a majority, and just like in the House of Representatives,
[00:14:13] we want to know the size of that majority, because even a
[00:14:17] difference of one or two senators is a very precarious
[00:14:21] margin. I think that will be
[00:14:24] what people will focus on next. It is possible that by
[00:14:28] Wednesday there will be elections that have not yet been decided because of how
[00:14:31] close they are. Therefore, I would not be surprised if
[00:14:35] on Wednesday we are waiting for more votes to be counted in some
[00:14:38] states, which could determine who will control the
[00:14:42] U.S. Senate. Would you
[00:14:44] be surprised if President Trump challenged or did not
[00:14:48] recognize the elections in such and such a state, saying that
[00:14:51] they were supposedly fraudulent and
[00:14:55] accept them? What could happen? Well, he has already
[00:14:59] done so throughout his political career, so I would not be surprised if
[00:15:02] he continued. And he is already giving signals in that regard. The
[00:15:05] Department of Justice has already initiated lawsuits, although the one in
[00:15:09] California has not progressed much, it has had some unfavorable
[00:15:11] rulings. But in California and Washington, the
[00:15:15] Department of Justice alleges that the vote of non-citizen
[00:15:18] people could influence the elections. In
[00:15:21] Alaska, there is a complaint about a candidate who has the same name
[00:15:25] as the current Republican senator, and the Department of Justice states that this
[00:15:29] could generate confusion among voters. But remember that in
[00:15:32] Alaska that issue already arose about two months ago and
[00:15:35] reached the Supreme Court, where it was asked whether that candidate, Dan
[00:15:39] Sullivan, with the same last name Sullivan as the current senator,
[00:15:43] should or should not appear on the ballot, and the answer from the
[00:15:46] U.S. Supreme Court was affirmative. So I don't
[00:15:50] think that lawsuit will prosper, but what it is doing
[00:15:53] is laying the groundwork for possible legal challenges,
[00:15:57] and if, for example, control of the Senate depended on the outcome of the
[00:16:01] elections in Alaska, what will happen to the lawsuit? Perhaps
[00:16:05] a lost lawsuit, but you could.
[00:16:07] It's there simply to obstruct the process, to delay as
[00:16:11] much as possible the achievement of a Democratic majority in the
[00:16:14] Senate. But do you foresee a scenario in which Trump says I don't recognize
[00:16:18] any of the results, these elections were fraudulent? Well, his
[00:16:22] Justice Department is already giving signs that it will present that argument in
[00:16:26] three states, so I suspect that if Trump could present
[00:16:29] that argument, he would do it. Would he succeed? I don't
[00:16:33] think so, unless something really abnormal happened in the elections.
[00:16:38] But right now nothing like that is happening, and the courts have already
[00:16:42] ruled against the claims that Trump is currently
[00:16:45] making. I suspect that the courts will not look favorably on that
[00:16:49] type of accusation if it goes to court. If
[00:16:53] Trump loses one of the chambers of Congress or both chambers of
[00:16:56] Congress, do you think that will make him more moderate,
[00:17:00] that is, more inclined to dialogue with
[00:17:04] the opposition or more extremist in the two
[00:17:08] years he has left in his term? You are asking me to get
[00:17:11] into Trump's head, and that is something I don't want
[00:17:13] to do. I have no way of knowing. Professor
[00:17:17] McDonald, thank you very much for your time. We have to go to a break. When we come back, my
[00:17:21] To understand the world, elections in the United States and what comes
[00:17:25] next. Don't go away, we'll be
[00:17:27] right back.
[00:17:33] You have 5 minutes, we have five things for you,
[00:17:36] a podcast with the five most important topics of the day,
[00:17:40] just ask your smart device, give me the latest
[00:17:43] news from CNN. Next, I'm going to tell you the five things
[00:17:47] you need to know at this time. Updated every hour, free
[00:17:50] of charge or commitment, stay informed from anywhere
[00:17:54] and at any time. Subscribe to
[00:17:57] our newsletter, listen to the five things you need to know
[00:18:01] throughout the day. Tuesday, election night in the United
[00:18:04] States. What is at stake is very important.
[00:18:08] Will Democrats win or will Republicans maintain control
[00:18:12] of Congress? While voters decide, CNN analyzes
[00:18:15] the most important issues, the key races, the voting
[00:18:19] data, and what all this means for the country. Join our
[00:18:22] journalists for a day with live reports, real-time
[00:18:26] results, in-depth analysis. Election night in the
[00:18:29] United States, Tuesday on
[00:18:31] CNN.
[00:18:42] In that setting of goals and
[00:18:44] relationships, we must maintain
[00:18:48] everything that has been achieved. Let's not talk about other chapters such as
[00:18:51] equality between men and women, such as
[00:18:55] working conditions, such as the distribution of wealth, which is
[00:18:59] one of the problems that globalization has had, that is, well,
[00:19:02] you have to be thinking about a distribution of wealth that
[00:19:05] works and does not create tensions, that part of
[00:19:10] have time for that, of recent times is
[00:19:14] very, very based on that tension produced by the global economy.
[00:19:17] by the global economy.
[00:20:02] Would you like to have a healthier life? Join me to
[00:20:05] discover new tips, the advances in science, and the current
[00:20:09] methods that can help us improve our mind and
[00:20:12] body in a consultation with Dr. Huerda, a CNN
[00:20:16] podcast. Live from Mexico
[00:20:20] City,
[00:20:22] a story can change everything. A look at
[00:20:26] the reconstruction efforts of a city and the hope of a people
[00:20:29] determined to rise. It evolved very quickly, and we never thought
[00:20:33] it would become a Category
[00:20:36] is happening, let's go with my colleague Ione Molinares to
[00:20:40] Washington.
[00:20:43] The explosion, well, we can see the dimension it had to take away the entire
[00:20:46] facade. We hear the protagonists.
[00:20:50] They mocked us as mothers and fathers of the 43,
[00:20:54] where she lived, a bomb fell. We are about to board this
[00:20:57] Mexican Air Force plane bound for Romania to
[00:21:01] have a complete view. We are here as
[00:21:04] migrants to progress, to make this country grow. There are great
[00:21:08] stories to know and many perspectives to analyze.
[00:21:11] Perspectives with Mario González, Monday to Friday
[00:21:14] on CNN.
[00:21:18] I'm Juan Carlos López, welcome to Clash of Opinions.
[00:21:22] Diplomacy, you know well, what is said in private is not what is said in public, well
[00:21:26] here we know what is said in private.
[00:21:29] Clash of Opinions, Sunday on CNN. Hello,
[00:21:33] I'm Annes Openheimer, I invite you to visit my YouTube channel, Openheimer
[00:21:36] presents. If you register there, we will send you our programs
[00:21:40] free every week after growing on CNN and my
[00:21:43] columns and
[00:21:44] comments.
[00:21:48] I'm waiting for you, help us.
[00:21:55] you need to seek the
[00:21:58] truth. Let's go back to the time when we had to be
[00:22:02] much more human, that's why we follow the facts
[00:22:05] wherever they lead us, no matter how far we have to
[00:22:09] go, from the internal story, there are new
[00:22:12] statements from President Donald Trump, I take an external
[00:22:16] perspective, we delve into the data, ready for whatever
[00:22:20] comes. Lorenzo was shot by an immigration
[00:22:22] agent, we face the world. Is it
[00:22:26] legal for a 3-year-old child to appear alone before a judge?
[00:22:29] Find joy in new perspectives and new
[00:22:32] horizons, every day, no matter where
[00:22:36] life takes you, we follow what matters
[00:22:40] to you, we forge a path to truth
[00:22:43] and understanding of the
[00:22:45] world.
[00:22:53] I am Mexican-British, I have been working as a journalist
[00:22:57] for 20 years, in Mexico City, in the United
[00:23:01] States, and now in Miami for CNN. CNN
[00:23:04] América is a multiplatform program where you will
[00:23:08] have information from all areas that will allow you to
[00:23:12] understand the world from whatever angle you are looking at it. In
[00:23:16] those 3 hours, you will not only have information from a political
[00:23:19] and economic point of view,
[00:23:23] but also health, from a women's perspective, but
[00:23:26] above all, it is a space where we can have conversations, not
[00:23:30] to polarize, but to
[00:23:59] polls be right in indicating that the Democrats, that is, the opposition, will win
[00:24:03] one or perhaps both chambers of Congress in Tuesday's midterm
[00:24:06] elections in the United States? That is, will
[00:24:10] these elections mark the beginning of the end of the era of
[00:24:14] President Trump's enormous power, or on the
[00:24:16] contrary, will pollsters be wrong, will they mess
[00:24:20] up as they were wrong in Brazil in the elections last
[00:24:23] Sunday? Practically all polls in the United
[00:24:26] States indicate that President Trump is very likely
[00:24:30] to lose his majority in the House of Representatives and perhaps
[00:24:34] also in the Senate. Even Fox News
[00:24:36] polls, the network that usually sympathizes with Trump,
[00:24:40] predict a Democratic victory. And
[00:24:43] that would make Trump lose a lot of power, because the
[00:24:47] Constitution does not allow him to be re-elected. And for
[00:24:50] the first time in his term, in his second term, at least, he would not control
[00:24:54] Congress. If Democrats win,
[00:24:57] they could block Trump's legislative projects, they could
[00:25:01] investigate corruption allegations against the president and his family, and
[00:25:04] perhaps they could even get Republican
[00:25:08] immigration policy and other issues. And if
[00:25:11] Trump loses these midterm elections and his
[00:25:15] popularity remains as low as it is now, many
[00:25:19] legislators from his own Republican Party could distance
[00:25:22] themselves from him in the remainder of his term because they will be
[00:25:26] thinking about their own political future leading up to the 2028
[00:25:29] elections. So the big question is, will
[00:25:32] the polls be right?
[00:25:35] Electoral experts tell me that, well, there's always a margin
[00:25:39] of error, but they are quite, quite confident in their
[00:25:42] data. First of all, they tell
[00:25:46] me the polls in the 2018 and
[00:25:49] 2022 midterm elections in the United States
[00:25:52] were quite accurate. Secondly, U.S. electoral
[00:25:56] history shows that the opposition
[00:25:59] party usually wins midterm elections. No matter
[00:26:03] who is in the White House, Republicans or
[00:26:05] Democrats, the opposition tends to win the
[00:26:09] midterms. Thirdly, Trump's travel schedule
[00:26:13] in recent days speaks for itself, and the states
[00:26:15] where Republicans are putting more money into electoral propaganda
[00:26:19] also speak for themselves. These are indicators
[00:26:22] that Trump's own party is on the
[00:26:25] defensive. President, has
[00:26:29] been traveling to support candidates.
[00:26:32] Republicans in states that until now were solidly Republican,
[00:26:36] like Texas or Kansas, are on the
[00:26:39] defensive trying to save their positions, instead of being
[00:26:43] on the offensive, trying to win rival
[00:26:47] districts, and besides all that, the electoral
[00:26:50] crime in the United States could hardly be more
[00:26:54] adverse for Trump. The price of gasoline is higher
[00:26:57] than at the end of former President Joe Biden's administration.
[00:27:01] The war between Ukraine and Russia, which Trump had promised
[00:27:04] to end on the first day of his term, continues
[00:27:07] its course, and the war against Iran, which Trump said would be an
[00:27:11] excursion, his words of a few
[00:27:14] weeks, has been going on for 8 months and shows no sign of
[00:27:17] ending either. We must also not forget that Trump had promised
[00:27:21] not to enter new wars, and in recent
[00:27:24] weeks another element has been added, a new element
[00:27:27] against Trump and his party: allegations of corruption in the
[00:27:31] government. According to Fox News,
[00:27:34] corruption has become, along with the high cost of living, the
[00:27:38] number one concern of voters.
[00:27:41] Many people are not comfortable with the fact that while prices
[00:27:45] are rising and many cannot make ends meet, Trump's fortune has
[00:27:49] skyrocketed. Look at this data that
[00:27:52] we have previously given: Forbes magazine
[00:27:56] says that Trump's fortune skyrocketed from
[00:27:59] 3.9 billion dollars in 2024, that is,
[00:28:03] the year before returning to the White House, to
[00:28:06] 7 billion dollars in
[00:28:09] 2026. You heard that right. It increased from
[00:28:12] 3.9 to 7 billion dollars
[00:28:16] in less than 2 years. What does
[00:28:19] Trump say? He says that he did not commit acts of corruption, but that he
[00:28:22] benefited from the rise in the stock market like many other
[00:28:26] Americans. But well, as the leader of the Democratic
[00:28:29] caucus in the House of Representatives told us on this program,
[00:28:34] the Democrats are going to investigate all this. They are going to investigate Trump's businesses
[00:28:38] and his family if they win these elections. For example, they want to investigate
[00:28:41] his cryptocurrency businesses.
[00:28:44] They want to investigate the $400 million plane that Qatar
[00:28:48] gave him, which is still not clear if it will remain in the hands of the
[00:28:51] US government or go to Trump's presidential library, meaning
[00:28:55] to Trump. They want to investigate the presidential pardons of several
[00:28:58] convicts, whose family and friends made donations
[00:29:03] to Trump's campaign and personal projects.
[00:29:08] the polls, Tuesday's elections will take place in
[00:29:11] a very adverse climate for Trump. But
[00:29:15] well, as we saw in Brazil last
[00:29:18] politics you should never say never, everything is
[00:29:21] possible, although all the indicators point to an
[00:29:24] overwhelming victory for the Democrats.
[00:29:28] Well, thank you for joining us. I invite you as always to my YouTube
[00:29:31] channel. There you will
[00:29:34] be able to see all our programs after they air on CNN, my columns and
[00:29:38] articles. Thank you, until next
[00:29:40] week.
[00:29:45] Opentimer presents, brought to you by.
[00:30:00] For more than 60 years, it has trained professionals with
[00:30:03] quality education, innovating, experimenting, and
[00:30:06] teaching entrepreneurship, combining international experiences,
[00:30:10] technology, and a global outlook to think beyond any
[00:30:13] border. And now you can also study online.
[00:30:16] Discover your career, more than
[00:30:20] a university, more than you expect.
[00:30:32] We are CNN, the world leader in news.
[00:30:46] Tuesday, October 27, and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva
[00:30:50] had double reason to celebrate. To the fourth
[00:30:53] term he achieved, something unprecedented in Brazil,
[00:30:56] was added his 81st birthday. His.