TELESUR — broadcast
20261104 030000 UTC
526 transcript segments
Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive.
Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record.

[00:00:00] to regain a certain power eh in terms of
[00:00:03] the decision on commercial policy by the US
[00:00:07] Senate, and with that, to start
[00:00:10] again, to give eh, in the case of President
[00:00:13] Trump, more work to the Office of the
[00:00:16] Trade Representative, who needs two things that
[00:00:20] President Trump does not necessarily like, which
[00:00:23] is time to conduct investigations based on commercial
[00:00:26] laws created during the Cold War, such as
[00:00:30] 301, 232, 201 and others
[00:00:33] that they have already used
[00:00:36] of the after eh the elimination of ICE by the Supreme
[00:00:39] Court, and again, this type of results that we are
[00:00:43] seeing, how Congress could eh again eh
[00:00:46] try to return to it eh the constitutional attributions of
[00:00:50] the formulation of commercial policy and subtract power from the
[00:00:54] strong presidentialism that President Trump has developed in terms
[00:00:58] of commercial policy. This also converges in a
[00:01:03] political vision for question that many will ask if they live in the United States, they will no longer be able to collect their $5
[00:01:07] check because the map is bluer than red, I'm
[00:01:10] not saying it, that was a promise of this midterm election campaign
[00:01:14] neighbors, especially in that the President of the United States Donald Trump himself had put forward, let's
[00:01:17] pass this question to our correspondent
[00:01:21] Carlos Montero who is with us live from Miami,
[00:01:24] Carlos, nice to greet you, good
[00:01:39] Americans, I think there are very few of us, I am
[00:01:42] Argentine but naturalized American, I never
[00:01:46] believed Trump that he was going to fulfill that promise of
[00:01:49] $5, and I think most Americans neither
[00:01:53] will the Republican Party
[00:01:56] regained control of or the identify with the Maga Democrat win, but well, it's a situation that we
[00:02:00] are living accustomed to Trump saying one thing and doing
[00:02:04] another, but I have information about here the
[00:02:08] state of Florida, I would like to start, I was talking in the
[00:02:12] participations I had in the various news programs of Telesur
[00:02:15] about this
[00:02:18] drug trafficking and attention to Democratic candidate Angi Nixon, Angi Nixon belongs to the
[00:02:21] far left wing of the Democratic Party, they call
[00:02:25] themselves Democratic Socialists of America, DSA,
[00:02:28] she was very, very close to
[00:02:32] getting the scan for senator of
[00:02:35] Florida, Ashley
[00:02:37] open the debate on the effectiveness of Moodi beat her by very
[00:02:40] little, by one point,
[00:02:42] she will continue in office, Ashley Moodi was already in the
[00:02:46] Senate representing Florida, because she was the one who replaced
[00:02:49] Marco Rubio when Marco Rubio went
[00:02:52] to be at the State Department appointed by
[00:02:56] Trump, so Ashley Moodi will finish what...
[00:03:00] began then this mid-term but Angi
[00:03:03] Nixon, really a spectacular campaign,
[00:03:06] we had the opportunity here in Miami, to talk to her people,
[00:03:10] they mobilized the bases, they did a campaign on social
[00:03:14] networks really spectacular, and for
[00:03:17] a candidate from the Democratic Party from
[00:03:20] the far left wing who loses by one point
[00:03:24] to a Republican who has all the support of the party
[00:03:28] in a state. where Republicans
[00:03:31] are very, very, very strong, it's something
[00:03:34] really very worthy, Republicans also
[00:03:38] managed to win the governorship in Florida,
[00:03:41] eh, there is a Republican governor
[00:03:45] DeSantis and his successor will continue,
[00:03:49] become a swing state in undoubtedly Byron Donalds will
[00:03:52] continue and also won by very few points, two
[00:03:55] points against his opponent.
[00:03:59] Democrat eh David Jolly and I want
[00:04:01] to mention another contest that is in development that there are many
[00:04:05] times people Paola say I'm not going to vote what good is my
[00:04:09] vote for there are no
[00:04:11] decisive in differences in district 27 which is a district that those of
[00:04:15] analyzing, there is not a change in us who work in television know the two contenders because at some
[00:04:18] point in our career we had the opportunity to work with them, district
[00:04:22] 27 of Miami which covers
[00:04:25] more than 70% of the
[00:04:28] population. are Latinos who live in this
[00:04:32] district and two eh
[00:04:35] former journalists compete, María Elvira Salazar in Latin America we know
[00:04:39] her very well because she works in the foreign relations committee of
[00:04:42] Congress, she is a representative for Florida and she competes
[00:04:47] what is the relationship it has had with against another journalist Elio Rodríguez, retired, he retired
[00:04:50] two or three years ago, now he got into politics
[00:04:53] and it's so close, almost
[00:04:57] 90% of the votes counted and... the difference
[00:05:00] between one and the other is less than 1 votes, María Elvira
[00:05:03] is in the lead, that shows you in the past elections, María
[00:05:07] Elvira won by a wide margin and now that
[00:05:11] Elio Rodríguez who... today President Trump wrote in a tweet
[00:05:15] he referred to him as the worst of the left,
[00:05:18] undoubtedly he is not left-wing, Elio Rodríguez,
[00:05:22] he is more to the right of the Democratic Party, but eh Donald
[00:05:26] Trump is so far to the right that
[00:05:29] he considers Elio Rodríguez to be on the left side, but
[00:05:33] well, that is still not known, we are
[00:05:36] waiting, but the difference
[00:05:38] is very, very small, CNN projection. If
[00:05:42] you allow me Paola, the Democrats are going
[00:05:46] to get control
[00:05:48] House, the House of Representatives, CNN
[00:05:52] is projecting it at these
[00:05:56] eh moments, so Republicans lose the House
[00:05:59] of Representatives and everything indicates that they will also
[00:06:03] lose the Senate, so difficult times are coming
[00:06:06] for Donald Trump who has to rethink why Americans
[00:06:09] are voting this way eh. that according to the latest
[00:06:13] data we received, he is the most unpopular
[00:06:17] president in US history, his approval ratings are
[00:06:20] on the floor, a little over
[00:06:23] 30%, let's see how he reacts, let's
[00:06:27] see if he keeps his promise that he had said, if we lose
[00:06:31] both chambers, the Republicans were controlling both
[00:06:35] chambers, I'm going to govern by decree
[00:06:38] with executive orders which would be crazy because undoubtedly
[00:06:41] it will eh clear the field as we say in soccer and
[00:06:45] it will complicate decision making for both sides, but well, that's what we have
[00:06:49] Florida, a state
[00:06:53] that continues to be eh
[00:06:56] Republican, but the Democrats are getting
[00:06:58] closer than they ever did in the past,
[00:07:02] things happened and that is reflected in
[00:07:05] the votes of Americans who are not satisfied with how
[00:07:09] Donald Trump is governing, I'll return to you Paola. Thank you
[00:07:12] Carlos Montero from Miami, from the state of Florida, one of the key
[00:07:16] and decisive states also for the vote of this election day of November
[00:07:20] 3rd, although well, more than 58 million citizens had already done
[00:07:24] so by absentee ballot in that country,
[00:07:27] Mariana, and in the midst of this scenario I think a big
[00:07:30] question comes, what will happen from now on for the
[00:07:34] next two years, will there be more false promises, will there
[00:07:37] be more excuses about what nothing has been achieved, will it be said
[00:07:41] today from: the White House,
[00:07:44] that it's simply that Trump was not on the ballot and that the
[00:07:47] candidates were not optimal to win this election, both in the
[00:07:51] House of Representatives, which today the Democrats control over the
[00:07:54] Republicans and the very, very close dispute in
[00:07:58] the Senate, not to mention the governorships, that's very possible,
[00:08:01] it's a very possible scenario that the loss will be attributed
[00:08:05] to their own campaigns that they themselves failed
[00:08:09] to do and not to President Trump, eh, as well... as
[00:08:12] the correspondents eh
[00:08:15] who eh have been updating us regarding each
[00:08:19] of the states that belong to eh what we know
[00:08:23] is that President Trump says one thing today and tomorrow he says
[00:08:26] another, something that has also earned him the title of "taco
[00:08:30] policy" eh he can modify or not eh according
[00:08:34] to the results and of course
[00:08:37] well we will see eh the statements he
[00:08:41] makes today if he does so through the
[00:08:44] media or through his favorite social network eh how
[00:08:48] he attributes this so far it seems
[00:08:52] a loss eh of the Republican party
[00:08:55] eh the various the various
[00:08:58] elections eh
[00:09:02] so far everything is almost blue yes
[00:09:05] that is the map that is being painted also at this time of night when it is
[00:09:09] 11:09 this helps us understand
[00:09:13] how it has been marking not only eh the House of
[00:09:16] Representatives, the Senate, but also the governorships, which
[00:09:20] are constituted as something key and
[00:09:24] what we have been
[00:09:27] policy, but a change in the electorate, there is
[00:09:30] discontent, disapproval of the management from the
[00:09:33] economic, from the social, from the political, and
[00:09:37] it is divided practically into these two axes, right, internal politics, but
[00:09:41] also a policy. Yes, and above all, I want to remind
[00:09:45] those who are watching us on Telesur that foreign
[00:09:48] policy per se as a priority
[00:09:51] issue eh for decision-making in elections
[00:09:55] does not necessarily translate that way in the electorate, but rather how foreign
[00:09:58] policy eh that the
[00:10:02] executive has becomes an issue of
[00:10:04] internal policy that affects in the
[00:10:07] future the way of life, its
[00:10:11] quality of life and access to goods
[00:10:14] and services that can be provided, in this sense, well,
[00:10:17] the war in Iran that we have already analyzed eh
[00:10:21] throughout the program, the effects it has on oil
[00:10:25] prices or the commercial war eh
[00:10:28] with different countries in terms of tariff policies
[00:10:32] well, it has had significant effects for
[00:10:36] consumers, it also makes life much
[00:10:39] more expensive, also products and a topic that
[00:10:43] we have also mentioned throughout the program is health
[00:10:46] policy which has also been a topic that matters to
[00:10:50] and the voters and who have taken part in the decision-making
[00:10:54] of what we are seeing in these results regarding
[00:10:58] the White House, it calls a lot of attention that security
[00:11:01] per se is not one of the relevant issues that
[00:11:04] traditionally we see in presidential
[00:11:07] elections nor organized crime with drug
[00:11:11] trafficking, again it is
[00:11:13] specifically the issue of the economy, the
[00:11:17] wallet, how it has been affected and the way of life
[00:11:21] eh what is determining how
[00:11:25] voters are voting in the United States. And yes, and while
[00:11:28] this happens, the fight against drug trafficking, which also
[00:11:32] generated a great opioid crisis, especially with
[00:11:36] fentanyl, which at some point marked a difference, even in
[00:11:39] speeches, accusing Latin American nations, but
[00:11:42] also from the Asian continent. None of these issues has
[00:11:46] weighed so heavily in this electoral contest, but nevertheless,
[00:11:50] some of the voters have also appropriated it, because
[00:11:53] everything that has been done in quotation marks, under the
[00:11:56] justification of eradicating drug
[00:11:59] trafficking, with the term of narcoterrorism, of
[00:12:02] classifying as terrorists those who supposedly have links with these
[00:12:06] transnational illicit activities, has not resolved at all the
[00:12:09] situation that afflicts one of the countries most consumers of
[00:12:22] next November 3rd in the United States. Not only will they define
[00:12:26] the balance of power in Congress during the second half of Donald
[00:12:30] Trump's mandate, they will also determine what policies and
[00:12:33] budgetary priorities will have legislative
[00:12:36] support, among them those related to the
[00:12:40] internal fight against
[00:12:43] addictions. The US drug
[00:12:46] policy faces a challenge that goes beyond the
[00:12:49] persecution of illicit trafficking, the expansion of
[00:12:52] fentanyl and other synthetic
[00:12:55] substances: deaths from overdose and difficulties in
[00:12:58] accessing treatment keep
[00:13:02] security measures and public health strategies.
[00:13:05] The outcome of the elections can influence the orientation of the
[00:13:09] federal drug policy. Congress has
[00:13:12] the power to approve budgets, oversee government
[00:13:14] agencies and modify
[00:13:18] laws. One of
[00:13:21] the central points is the distribution of resources.
[00:13:25] is allocated to border control, investigations and operations
[00:13:29] against drug trafficking networks,
[00:13:31] the differences between these
[00:13:34] priorities fuel a political debate on whether the
[00:13:38] response should concentrate. And in the midst of all this
[00:13:40] scenario, we continue to add the perspective, the analysis of a
[00:13:44] day that already has results that speak
[00:13:47] broadly of a victory for the Democrats, at least in the
[00:14:01] drawing what appears to be a
[00:14:04] resounding result for the Democratic Party
[00:14:08] tonight, as more data is added
[00:14:11] on the results of this legislative
[00:14:14] midterm election here in the United States, as you
[00:14:17] said, the lower house, the House of
[00:14:20] Representatives. it is taken for
[00:14:23] granted that the Democratic Party
[00:14:27] has recovered it, and to help us precisely put into
[00:14:30] perspective everything that has been known so far,
[00:14:34] Andrea Fernández, analyst and member
[00:14:37] of the Latin American Affairs
[00:14:41] Working Group, thank you very much,
[00:14:44] thank you for being with us, thank you very much for the
[00:14:53] fact, it is already a fact that
[00:14:56] the Democrats won the lower house, the house,
[00:15:00] what are you reading that is happening or will happen with the
[00:15:04] Senate, I have hope, but I also think
[00:15:08] that from what we are seeing the Democrats
[00:15:11] will also win the Senate eh,
[00:15:15] I think that if we have both chambers under
[00:15:18] Democratic control then we will be able to see a
[00:15:22] type of eh, I guess a little more
[00:15:26] push against the administration and the policies that
[00:15:29] we are currently seeing, so the issue of the
[00:15:33] policies that we are currently seeing.
[00:15:38] for the Hispanic community in the United States we are talking about
[00:15:41] 70 million Hispanics, of which
[00:15:45] 39 million were
[00:15:48] eligible to vote, but not necessarily registered
[00:15:52] to vote, but they are increasingly a more important economic and political
[00:15:55] force and the Hispanic community is very discontent,
[00:15:59] especially with these ICE
[00:16:03] procedures, the US Immigration Service.
[00:16:06] That could have also played a role in this
[00:16:10] election, I understand that, especially if
[00:16:13] you look at the state of Florida, I think many
[00:16:16] of the sectors
[00:16:19] that previously voted for Trump very
[00:16:22] strongly, we saw a reduction in the number of votes that
[00:16:25] the Republican candidate received and I think much of
[00:16:29] that came from the issue of
[00:16:31] deportations and the detainees that
[00:16:35] people have had in the state.
[00:16:38] especially I know that the Cuban-American
[00:16:41] community that lives there, many of them were
[00:16:44] disappointed, as Trump's policy also affected
[00:16:48] them, who have been a minority who usually do
[00:16:51] not have eh do not suffer the same
[00:16:54] consequences, I suppose, as other Hispanic groups,
[00:16:57] but in Florida it is seen, in Texas, in Texas also
[00:17:01] we are seeing that the
[00:17:04] border, many of them also. eh have
[00:17:08] become markedly bluer, so I think
[00:17:12] that ICE and immigration policies specifically
[00:17:15] that we are seeing within the country have had
[00:17:19] an effect on how Hispanics have voted. President
[00:17:22] Trump launched exactly you remember that every
[00:17:25] day for the last 12 days or something like that, every day
[00:17:29] he visited some state campaigning and he said
[00:17:32] vote for me, in reality
[00:17:35] forget that you are voting for a Republican
[00:17:38] representative, vote for me in that very
[00:17:42] special style that he has, ultimately this was a
[00:17:46] referendum on Trump, I think
[00:17:49] so, I think especially
[00:17:51] looking at eh the results of different
[00:17:55] polls that have been recently eh
[00:17:57] his popularity is in the 30s, it's a very
[00:18:01] low number even when you
[00:18:03] compare it with Obama or with eh.
[00:18:07] Aiden previously, so I think that people really don't,
[00:18:11] no, they are not very much in favor of
[00:18:14] him currently and I think much of this has been a rejection of
[00:18:18] Trump as such, not so much. Do you think that this
[00:18:21] night or in the next few days all the results will be resolved
[00:18:25] or will they say that this was a
[00:18:28] fraud and mess up the game?
[00:18:32] Eh, well, unfortunately I
[00:18:35] think there will be some kind of
[00:18:39] a call of fraud or something like that, knowing how this
[00:18:42] administration, especially the president operate eh,
[00:18:46] so far we have not seen any evidence that this is the
[00:18:50] case, that this is the case, so let's hope not,
[00:18:54] but even so, this administration always surprises us, so
[00:18:57] I don't want to rule out that
[00:19:00] possibility, it is repeated what has
[00:19:03] been repeated in midterm elections
[00:19:07] in... previous opportunities that the party in
[00:19:10] power always loses or the
[00:19:14] party represented by the presidency in power, but
[00:19:18] this apparently may be what Obana himself
[00:19:22] experienced at the time that eh Obama
[00:19:25] described this, he says I had to live
[00:19:28] a beating, apparently we are in a similar
[00:19:32] situation, I think so, but
[00:19:35] also eh, I think
[00:19:38] that currently people see themselves in a slightly
[00:19:42] different situation than when Obama was in this situation,
[00:19:45] especially with the economic situation at a level
[00:19:49] that I don't think it was when Obama was in that
[00:19:53] situation, obviously there was a kind of rejection
[00:19:56] towards foreign policy, but currently
[00:20:00] we have the problem of foreign policy with Iran and other issues also
[00:20:04] with tariffs, but people also. are affected in their daily
[00:20:08] lives by the policies of this government,
[00:20:11] especially when they go to buy gasoline or go to buy
[00:20:15] eggs or any other daily necessities.
[00:20:18] Your family is in Puerto Rico, how is Puerto Rico living, how has it lived and
[00:20:24] the Trump government or with the impressions of the Trump government?
[00:20:28] Well, currently in Puerto Rico we have a governor who is
[00:20:31] a Trump supporter, she is eh very much in favor
[00:20:35] of the president and she is. always
[00:20:38] trying to find a way to unfortunately
[00:20:40] recently took action to in a
[00:20:42] certain way
[00:20:45] eh
[00:20:48] get many of the people who are in Puerto Rico, many of them are
[00:20:52] Dominicans from the Dominican Republic, eh, she
[00:20:55] gave ISIS the names of many of them,
[00:20:58] recently under the farce that ah, if they
[00:21:02] register we can give them licenses, many of them
[00:21:05] went to try to do the process and ICE took
[00:21:08] them, it's very sad and currently we see how these
[00:21:12] ICE policies also affect people in Puerto Rico
[00:21:16] that many people may not think would affect them in the same way.
[00:21:20] eh, but even so, economically Puerto Rico remains in a difficult
[00:21:24] situation and there has been no kind
[00:21:27] of improvement under this administration, I think. To
[00:21:31] finish, if you have to make a prediction, what
[00:21:34] will happen, how will it be in the next 2 years,
[00:21:37] now that the Democratic Party has had the success
[00:21:41] it has had in this election. I have hope that,
[00:21:44] especially with the new Democrats who are coming to power, many of
[00:21:48] them are more progressive. with a particularly
[00:21:53] foreign policy, a little more
[00:21:56] eh well progressive in the sense that
[00:22:00] they believe we should do better in how we treat our
[00:22:04] Latin America, I have hope that to some extent they can
[00:22:08] to some extent prevent the
[00:22:12] administration from continuing this trajectory towards
[00:22:16] fascism that we are seeing, but
[00:22:19] eh, we have to hope that they are strong and that they really take
[00:22:23] their positions
[00:22:31] precisely with Andrea Fernández, political
[00:22:35] analyst who was helping us, then, put into perspective
[00:22:39] this historic night, where it has already been confirmed
[00:22:42] that the Democratic Party has
[00:22:46] the House, the House of Representatives. and
[00:22:50] that there is a clearly justified
[00:22:53] optimism that the Senate may reach
[00:22:57] the same situation that the Democrats will regain
[00:23:00] control and thus control the US
[00:23:04] Congress. Back to you, Paola.
[00:23:07] Thank you, Jorge, and not only would it be the House of Representatives,
[00:23:11] this will also have its impact in the Senate,
[00:23:15] in the third that is also renewed this day. This is what
[00:23:19] is also registered in this vote in one of the
[00:23:22] states with the highest voting population, we are talking about
[00:23:26] Texas, yes it is, let's see the
[00:23:28] results, we share them with you, there we
[00:23:32] have Talarico with
[00:23:35] 58.30% above Kent Paxton
[00:23:38] with 40.20%, what does this mean to tell
[00:23:41] you here the Democrats reverse,
[00:23:45] they flip the seat that has historically been painted
[00:23:48] red. for many years since
[00:23:51] 1988 today the Democrats recover this
[00:23:54] seat in their favor within the Senate, a
[00:23:58] very interesting policy, a very close contest and
[00:24:02] where Talarico has also won not only in this contest
[00:24:05] thanks to the electorate, but also the millionaire investment he has
[00:24:09] made technology billionaire Elomos
[00:24:13] who gave Paxton the sum of
[00:24:16] 200 million dollars. His
[00:24:20] campaign, Mariana, this is not a minor fact, it is not a minor fact,
[00:24:24] especially when in the United States eh economic
[00:24:27] resources were decisive
[00:24:30] to eh win a presidential campaign, again
[00:24:33] this election is changing many things
[00:24:37] that eh previously we took for granted,
[00:24:41] so Elon Mus will not be happy at all because an important
[00:24:44] state, especially on artificial intelligence issues, it seems
[00:24:48] it will not be in his favor. This also helps us understand that
[00:24:52] not everything is discerned through digital platforms, through
[00:24:56] social networks that do have their impact, but the United
[00:25:00] States itself, which has become one of the central axes
[00:25:03] of these campaigns with the bot farms, the articulation, the
[00:25:06] financing that we also know where it comes from, from the large
[00:25:10] contributors who finance campaigns,
[00:25:12] mobilization of not going above the conscience
[00:25:16] of the electorate, there has been an interesting campaign mobilization of the...
[00:25:20] Democrats, what do you think the Democratic wing has managed to capitalize on
[00:25:23] over the Republican, especially the economy and how
[00:25:27] it is directly affecting the inability of
[00:25:30] many people to be able to eh buy their food, to be able
[00:25:34] to move eh eh in terms of energy
[00:25:37] resources, not to make it to the end
[00:25:40] of the month is
[00:25:42] definitely Paola something that is affecting
[00:25:46] significantly and I think we will have to study
[00:25:50] these elections with... a lot of calm because all those questions
[00:25:53] again that there was a clear trend in
[00:25:56] historical processes of electoral analysis in
[00:25:59] the United States are decoupling quite
[00:26:02] significantly and to this we also add the results that have
[00:26:06] to do with the Senate, we continue to talk about these decisive seats
[00:26:10] within US politics, for example,
[00:26:13] Georgia, John Ossoff with
[00:26:16] 58.5% in favor of the Democratic wing
[00:26:19] above Mike Collins with 41.5%, well here
[00:26:23] a difference also of a few points but
[00:26:26] that speak of this trend that is maintained in several states
[00:26:30] of the United States. A
[00:26:32] trend eh that is maintained eh by
[00:26:36] the Democratic party's gain and what we can see
[00:26:39] so far in terms of results in the Senate
[00:26:43] eh there are two seats that the Democratic party has
[00:26:47] already won, meaning that they were previously
[00:26:50] Republican and have turned blue and in the House of
[00:26:54] Representatives there are six positions that the Democratic
[00:26:57] party has won eh it tells us a lot
[00:27:01] Paola according. Really there will be many who will
[00:27:04] not be very happy and as you said eh
[00:27:07] later it will be a matter of analysis about
[00:27:10] who is to blame for a loss that
[00:27:14] seems very important in certain
[00:27:17] sectors that previously under no
[00:27:20] circumstances would have been eh Democrats here a comparison
[00:27:24] for example to always have a perspective
[00:27:27] the coin with propriety economy
[00:27:31] migration two central axes that hit the Trump administration,
[00:27:35] the Republican party in this contest, but
[00:27:38] what other factors have weighed so that for example eh
[00:27:41] Florida, which is one of the absolutely conservative
[00:27:44] states, one of the Republican strongholds, remains
[00:27:48] so, it remains so eh because again I told
[00:27:51] you eh in terms of a voting trend
[00:27:55] the voters who
[00:27:58] project are a hard vote, right? And that's something
[00:28:03] that eh we haven't necessarily talked about until now, but
[00:28:06] eh it's called a hard vote, although
[00:28:09] any thing or any policy that the political
[00:28:13] party to which one belongs identifies with, the vote
[00:28:17] eh it is very unlikely that that vote will change,
[00:28:21] that is to say it is a vote eh, that is why it is called hard
[00:28:25] because it remains constant even if eh the
[00:28:28] let's say the problems eh affect you directly
[00:28:31] in the case eh of the Republican party and I think
[00:28:35] Florida is a great example, eh more than half of those who identify
[00:28:39] with the Maga project, not necessarily with the Republican party
[00:28:43] eh they said they would continue to vote
[00:28:46] eh for that party even if the policies eh
[00:28:50] affected them, it's not necessarily so for the Democratic
[00:28:53] party eh less eh around
[00:28:55] 30% is considered the hard vote by
[00:28:59] the Democratic party eh in in...
[00:29:02] in the United States and that tells you a lot eh
[00:29:06] Paola about eh how eh one reflects
[00:29:09] or how one decides to vote for one
[00:29:12] party over another, so if we still see
[00:29:16] the results we have now and we can explain
[00:29:20] on that side eh why Florida eh remains, well,
[00:29:23] there is a great tradition and an important hard vote of the Republican
[00:29:27] party in a state that seems to remain
[00:29:30] red against the tide of
[00:29:33] others eh that you said very well eh to see
[00:29:36] the other side of the coin, Texas is turning
[00:29:40] blue and Florida remains red, these states
[00:29:43] that we are now seeing in midterm elections that can
[00:29:46] be modified will be very important and will probably
[00:29:51] the presidential elections in the
[00:29:54] future and that eh will be eh the subject
[00:29:58] of important monitoring of political analysis by
[00:30:02] those who study eh elections eh especially in
[00:30:05] the United States on how the average voter is being
[00:30:09] reconfigured and voting preferences, despite
[00:30:13] having even chosen candidates who represent
[00:30:15] certain eh population groups, no,
[00:30:19] as happened in Florida, the first
[00:30:22] governor of Tes eh
[00:30:25] dark that he has, has been elected, but I don't know to what
[00:30:29] extent this type of strategy has also served
[00:30:32] the Republican wing, I would like to add more results regarding
[00:30:36] this election, Virginia is also another of the
[00:30:40] states that consolidates the Senate seat in favor of the
[00:30:43] Democrats, Warner with
[00:30:46] 59.7% against Bert
[00:30:49] Mizusawa with 40%.
[00:30:52] This also helps us understand how the movement of a broad
[00:30:56] campaign has been and what will come from now on Mariana.