TVRI — broadcast 20261012 153000 UTC 289 transcript segments Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (https://www.gdeltproject.org/), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Machine transcription. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a verbatim quotation record. [00:00:00] crisis, let's say at the beginning with [00:00:03] the pandemic, people in Romania and not only in Romania, but also in the rest of Europe [00:00:06] and the rest of the world had to face situations [00:00:10] they had never encountered before, and [00:00:12] then the depreciation, [00:00:15] for example, of money, inflation, [00:00:18] the rising cost of living, all these were felt, and [00:00:22] the uncertainty about what will follow, [00:00:26] plus a political class that was very [00:00:29] dis... disappointing, let's say for many, because [00:00:33] that's it, that's what we discovered and why [00:00:36] they captured him, they discovered him on TikTok, Georgescu, who spoke in some way, [00:00:40] that he spoke about God, that I don't know what. Simion has a different [00:00:44] type of discourse than Georgescu and he succeeded, behold, [00:00:48] more than Georgescu, I would give too much credit or [00:00:51] too much importance to Georgescu's profile. [00:00:54] The idea is that [00:00:56] the budget deficit to people, without being fiercely, without... [00:01:00] perhaps believing all the nonsense, to express myself [00:01:03] less elegantly, said by a [00:01:06] politician at some point, they actually wanted to slap some [00:01:10] people, the politicians from the Romanian [00:01:13] political mainstream, whom they consider guilty of the bad situation they are in. [00:01:17] They did that, but that brought for [00:01:21] another part, for another component of Romanian society, it [00:01:24] brought what you call the fear of Călin Georgescu and [00:01:28] you talk about a deep fear, [00:01:32] suddenly appeared and you say something fascinating, you say [00:01:36] at some point. Many of, in quotes, [00:01:39] his thoughts initially amused the public. [00:01:42] Those who saw Georgescu's eventual election as a [00:01:46] danger, adapted to the stressful situation created [00:01:49] by the sovereignist shock, making [00:01:52] fun of their misfortune, an adaptation mechanism, probably typically [00:01:56] Romanian. Well, [00:01:59] probably. And others, because here we would discuss a lot if we [00:02:02] discussed a lot whether we put it or not [00:02:05] typically, exactly, it was a concession I made to my [00:02:09] colleagues, [00:02:11] yes, but I think it was a coping mechanism through which many [00:02:15] managed to cope with a very great stress, and then from the discussions [00:02:19] with those I interviewed already in February, I started [00:02:22] interviews with the middle class, I discovered [00:02:26] what they feared, and most of them feared that we were turning towards [00:02:30] an authoritarian regime, that we were losing democracy, that we were losing [00:02:33] security, that the rapprochement with Russia, which [00:02:37] he denied, at least, he denied it and even [00:02:40] he, he let it be suggested that it would be something [00:02:44] serious, it would bring to our security as [00:02:48] a state and as a society, all these have and the loss [00:02:51] of economic power, because the isolation, the isolationism that [00:02:55] Georgescu was talking about, made many think that they would [00:02:59] lose their jobs, the cost of living [00:03:02] would increase even more, investors would avoid Romania because [00:03:06] it is a politically unstable country, and then all [00:03:09] these were accounted for in people's [00:03:13] minds, but this fear was not again an individual [00:03:17] thing, we said social fear there, because [00:03:20] that's how it happens, people talk about [00:03:23] their fears, about their emotions, and they end up having [00:03:27] the same representations after all. So this was also [00:03:31] justified, as Filip was saying earlier, [00:03:34] the others we met, for example, in the countryside, did not see [00:03:38] this, this danger to such a great extent, I asked some of them, but [00:03:42] weren't you afraid that Georgescu, if he had [00:03:44] won, a form of enthusiasm in a way, some of [00:03:48] them, but I repeat, many hadn't even known him before, hadn't known him before, [00:03:52] but as they saw him, his appearances on television [00:03:55] helped increase his support. Alina, Filip, in [00:03:58] this situation. [00:04:01] the hope of some or that little bit [00:04:04] of joy or, I'll say hope, the hope [00:04:08] of some in a redeemer radically opposes [00:04:12] the fear of others towards this [00:04:16] redeemer, which turns into a deep [00:04:19] social fracture, I see you like [00:04:22] this idea of fracture that we are constantly trying to [00:04:25] overcome, it must be overcome, but now when we look [00:04:28] around, it exists. to overcome and of course, with one research, you don't [00:04:32] make a spring, so we need some, we need [00:04:36] some measures, but I was thinking that if we [00:04:40] coalition. Only the PSD reacted look, I'll go back to my idea, that if we look at the causes, then maybe it won't be [00:04:44] necessary, because this desire for a redeemer or [00:04:48] this hope that a person can solve [00:04:51] something or even a party, it is [00:04:54] installed in a society in a certain [00:04:57] crisis context, meaning social crises. political [00:05:00] economic, wars produce [00:05:04] this, I don't know, desire, psychologists have studied it better [00:05:07] than us, where this need of people comes [00:05:11] from, but not of individual people, but of a [00:05:15] social body, to seek a savior, well, [00:05:18] it comes from the crisis situation, and then action must be taken upon this situation, [00:05:22] rectified somehow and rectified with people in mind, [00:05:25] because what we say in the book and we even criticize the [00:05:28] current governors, in fact we [00:05:31] criticize them because we wrote, we did the research [00:05:34] after the change and [00:05:37] the parliamentary elections of 2024, we [00:05:40] say this: look at the situation of other countries in [00:05:44] Europe, where extremist, radical, anti-system [00:05:48] parties have gained ground in recent [00:05:50] years, they gained ground, especially after 2008, after [00:05:54] the crisis that hit economically, financially, the Western [00:05:58] world and then the rest, after [00:06:00] 2008 and in the conditions where the austerity [00:06:03] measures taken by governments to save [00:06:08] reduce spending, affected especially the vulnerable, [00:06:21] there are many people who feel that the burden [00:06:24] of repairing situations is only on their shoulders [00:06:28] and they see, again, they make a comparison and this comparison is not [00:06:32] likely to necessarily create resentments, [00:06:35] a horrible comparison when you look at [00:06:38] the VAT collection rate in Romania and [00:06:41] the fact that many people declare this [00:06:45] calmly everywhere, and those people who [00:06:49] suffer terribly because of this economic [00:06:52] pressure, well, okay, and what stops you from solving this [00:06:55] problem? They pay VAT, you increase it for food [00:06:59] and for books and for absolutely everything, [00:07:02] yes, they increased it and they pay it, but that money doesn't [00:07:05] reach the state treasury, which is even more [00:07:08] that, and not only us, that there are also. [00:07:13] we also wrote and we have a chapter at the end of [00:07:16] our publication, in which [00:07:20] we show what happened in other countries in the West and East [00:07:23] of Europe, that these measures are not necessarily the best [00:07:27] and that people if if they feel [00:07:30] uprooted or dislocated and [00:07:34] outside of a control over [00:07:36] their own destiny, then they are even more receptive to [00:07:39] propaganda, but the solution is not to... combat [00:07:43] the propaganda that exists, yes, with [00:07:45] other propaganda, meaning propaganda in the end will keep you [00:07:49] hungry, when you're in government, I was [00:07:52] thinking, I remembered a friend who lived for a few [00:07:56] years in Vietnam, in communist Vietnam, and she told [00:08:00] us that there, on their public television, the only one that existed, [00:08:03] probably, there were only songs and good cheer, the Vietnamese [00:08:07] didn't necessarily bring good things, but at least the [00:08:10] official show was of a nature to create the impression that things were good, [00:08:14] I don't think we can, I mean, I don't think a solution for us is not [00:08:18] to talk about things, to pretend they don't exist, to not [00:08:22] know at your TV station, let's [00:08:26] say, as an example, we need to put our fingers [00:08:29] on the wound, the people we talked to really put it [00:08:33] there many times, they told us, they told us in their [00:08:36] own words, what we theorized under the concept of social [00:08:39] roots, that they told us about the fact that... their salary is [00:08:43] not enough, they having a normal working schedule of eight hours [00:08:47] or even more, doing tasks, for example, that were not necessarily [00:08:51] in their job description, but anyway, if the employer asked, [00:08:54] they do it because they know how, a salary that no longer allows them to [00:08:58] send their children to school, to give them a starting [00:09:02] point in life, according to the tradition of Romanian [00:09:06] families, not that you help the young person to [00:09:09] settle down, you here talked about people with low incomes. [00:09:13] and about people with middle incomes, but you also talked [00:09:16] to small local entrepreneurs [00:09:19] in the areas where you did the research, people [00:09:23] who expressed their deep frustration with [00:09:26] social inequality, with inequality of opportunity, that's [00:09:30] right, meaning we identified [00:09:32] in some a picture of very small things, [00:09:36] we often talk about big phenomena, but these are people who wanted to [00:09:40] expand a store, yes. [00:09:43] to feed a school, to get a contract to feed a [00:09:46] school, you make credible the idea that through your own effort, not that this [00:09:50] is the dominant discourse, no, we have to say the word [00:09:53] neoliberalism, this is it, this is the moral of the current economy, [00:09:57] that if you invest, if you are serious, if you stick to it, if [00:10:01] you study, if you work and sometimes break your back, let's say, [00:10:05] figuratively, at least, you will succeed, well, in this [00:10:09] case we had a man who was running around us when he was talking to us. [00:10:12] he served all the meals at the same time, he was both an employee and [00:10:15] an owner, and what else could he do, he said he [00:10:19] had five, six days a week when he served and prepared food and [00:10:23] on the seventh day he went to get supplies, [00:10:26] when could he have become more, to, to overcome [00:10:30] his condition, yes, and if you don't offer such [00:10:34] a person some, I don't know how to say, it has to be [00:10:37] a combination, it has to be factors and materials, meaning [00:10:41] practically to have some policies that redistribute somehow, to try to [00:10:45] recognize, to identify these types of efforts, at least these, I [00:10:49] would like to insist on a fact that I think those who [00:10:52] follow us should understand, you don't say. [00:10:55] for a second when you talk about social policies, as you [00:10:58] are doing now, Filip, you don't do anything in the category [00:11:02] of it's good to give people things, you never say that, that's [00:11:06] not what you mean, surprisingly, none of our interlocutors, and we [00:11:09] talked to very poor people, no one [00:11:12] said: "We want social assistance to increase, we want [00:11:16] the city hall to give us, we want the city hall to give us." Some said yes, indeed, [00:11:20] maybe the mayor favors some more than others when [00:11:23] he gives them... for example firewood for the winter, but there are [00:11:26] compatriots who often say we should be given, I don't know, we didn't hear [00:11:30] that, and we talked to over 50, we talked to over 50 people, you know what [00:11:34] they wanted, they wanted well-paid jobs, locally if [00:11:38] possible, that's it and from here [00:11:41] a certain trace of regret for other times [00:11:45] in which, of course, there is, I also encountered nostalgia for [00:11:48] communism and Georgescu's discourse who said yes, okay, we will [00:11:51] bring, we will restart the factories, yes, meaning yes, when [00:11:55] you had a CAP and you had a small enterprise that collapsed, I'm not saying those should [00:11:59] have continued, but they were replaced by nothing, on the other hand, it must be [00:12:02] that it would be honest on our part, we must also [00:12:05] remember the small local entrepreneurs, those [00:12:08] who say it is extremely difficult, although [00:12:11] you pay decently or relatively decently, to [00:12:15] find people willing to come and do something, there is also [00:12:19] this other side of the coin, we are currently doing another [00:12:22] research, we are right in the middle of new research. about [00:12:26] Romania, a destination country for immigrants from Southeast Asia, it is [00:12:29] called Dreamland, [00:12:32] we are trying to promote it and because we want to talk to as many [00:12:35] employers as possible and understand their perspective as well. [00:12:39] For now, we are in the phase of collecting interviews with immigrants and [00:12:42] they come to Romania and see, for example, that it is a country [00:12:46] where they live better than in their own, but they are paid most [00:12:50] often, with minimum wage and with a very high workload, [00:12:53] illegal in fact. [00:12:56] unfortunately, Romanian employers, I can say that, I'm not [00:13:00] afraid, prefer to pay very [00:13:03] poorly, if they paid higher salaries, probably then [00:13:07] the temptation of Romanians to go abroad seasonally to work in [00:13:10] agriculture in other countries would be [00:13:13] lower, the intensity of work abroad is very high, you can't [00:13:17] sustain it indefinitely, meaning you sustain it at 20, 30, 35, but when [00:13:20] you get close to 40, 45, maybe a job [00:13:23] paid less. less would be acceptable for these [00:13:27] people, meaning no, we are not asking [00:13:30] for absurd things, but anyway, what Alina also said and [00:13:34] somehow I would also insist on this idea, we should [00:13:37] know that there is a reality, as the [00:13:40] English say, complicated social decay, which [00:13:44] we with formulas like "people don't want to work", "you can't find", don't [00:13:48] solve it, not like that, purely and simply, not like that, we have to say [00:13:51] it honestly, let's try to understand, let's do. a [00:13:55] series of extensive research, to see how people live, after all, how [00:13:59] they earn a living, because the way they earn a living is also the way this society [00:14:03] holds together after all, I don't think these studies [00:14:07] are absolutely necessary, you say this very often and you [00:14:10] also do it, yes, good, it's a good example, as I said, [00:14:14] a flower, I don't think it should, I think we [00:14:17] should formulate a conclusion now, [00:14:21] a research that leads us in a very good direction, [00:14:25] this lesson is that no one gains anything, [00:14:28] on the contrary, neither by anathematizing these [00:14:32] voters, nor by anathematizing the idea of [00:14:35] sovereignism, because that's not what it's about, but it's about [00:14:38] what happens very close to our skin, about the conditions in which [00:14:42] we live, about our labor relations, about [00:14:46] our dignity relations in society, the deep [00:14:50] causes are there and you demonstrate this [00:14:53] and. all this spectacular surface, in [00:14:57] the worst sense of the term, that some are [00:15:00] toothless and primitive, others are an arrogant [00:15:04] and bloated elite [00:15:07] and, how to say, old in evil, all [00:15:11] this foam of image is something that [00:15:13] sends us astray, as they say in Romanian, not seeing [00:15:17] the real causes of what is happening here, thank [00:15:20] you very much for this study and good luck with what you [00:15:24] have to do. [00:15:33] sovereignism in Romania, why do people vote for extremist politicians. [00:29:32] Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the main news edition of [00:29:35] the day. [00:29:38] The designated prime minister proposes a six-month pact to pro-European [00:29:41] parties for the support of the future government. So far, only [00:29:45] small parliamentary groups have [00:29:47] said yes. Russia hit Ukraine's energy [00:29:50] infrastructure even after Donald Trump announced an energy [00:29:54] armistice between Moscow and Kyiv. Ukrainians respected [00:29:57] the White House's proposal. [00:30:00] More supporters of Donald Trump distance themselves from the White House leader [00:30:04] ahead of the November elections. This is also happening in traditionally [00:30:08] Republican states. [00:30:12] And here, the largest Orthodox pilgrimage included a [00:30:15] procession through the streets of Iași. Tens of thousands of believers greeted [00:30:19] the holy relics of Saint Parascheva and Saint Paisie carried on [00:30:23] the shoulders of [00:30:23] priests. [00:30:32] a six-month political agreement for the support of the government, not just a [00:30:36] vote for investiture, is the proposal that the designated prime minister made [00:30:39] to the parties of the former ruling [00:30:43] favorably because it practically responds to the condition it [00:30:46] announced from the start, a parliamentary majority with PNL and [00:30:50] UDMR. The liberals, however, remain consistent and exclude any alliance with [00:30:53] the social democrats, as do the USR leaders.