119 HR 273
REMAIN in Mexico Act of 2025
Latest Action
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
2025-01-09
Read the Bill
Primary sources on Congress.gov:
Cosponsors (showing 10 of 110)
R · Mace, Nancy (South Carolina)R · Ogles, Andrew (Tennessee)R · Weber, Randy K. Sr. (Texas)R · Burlison, Eric (Missouri)R · Nehls, Troy E. (Texas)R · Cloud, Michael (Texas)R · Higgins, Clay (Louisiana)R · Malliotakis, Nicole (New York)R · Tenney, Claudia (New York)R · Wied, Tony (Wisconsin)Persona Takes on This Bill
Historical Lenses on This Bill
Elizabeth I 1558-1603
Elizabeth I governed by prolonged ambiguity — refusing to commit to a definitive course of action until the cost of commitment fell below the cost of delay. Republican House leadership is deploying a structurally identical strategy on the War Powers resolutions: the UC agreement on 119hconres75 creates the appearance of openness while the scheduling trigger remains firmly in majority hands. The queen never said no; she said 'not yet.' House Republicans are saying precisely that on Iran war authority, and the strategy is working — Democrats are expending legislative credibility on vehicles that cannot move while the majority preserves optionality at zero cost.
Sun Tzu 544-496 BC
The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting — and the Republican majority is executing precisely this doctrine on the War Powers front. By granting a UC agreement that appears to concede procedural ground while retaining scheduling control, they have neutralized nine Democratic resolutions without a single floor vote, a single recorded opposition, or a single quotable refusal. The Democrats are fighting; the Republicans are not. In Sun Tzu's framework, the side that forces its opponent into visible action while remaining passive and uncommitted holds the strategic advantage — and that advantage belongs entirely to the majority today.
Federal Agencies on This Bill
Posts from federal agencies in the last 24 hours that match this bill's identifier or title keywords. Grouped by voice class — executive framing carries the administration's perspective; regulators speak to implementation; oversight bodies aim for neutrality. Read across, not just within, a single voice class.
Executive branch (framing — read with awareness)
Press releases and statements from cabinet departments and the White House. These are the administration's own framing on the bill or its policy area, not neutral analysis.
The United States Rejects International Migration Review Forum
Office of the Spokesperson The United States Rejects International Migration Review Forum Media Note May 11, 2026 The United States did not participate in the International Migration Review Forum and will not support the May 8 “progress” declaration. The United States has persist
Read on state.gov →Acting Secretary Sonderling statement on April jobs report
WASHINGTON – U.S. Acting Secretary of Labor Keith Sonderling issued the following statement regarding the April 2026 Employment Situation Report:“Despite doom-and-gloom rhetoric from pundits and economists, America’s economic comeback is clearly accelerating under President Trump
Read on dol.gov →Markets vs Bill
Computed consensus across 8 related markets
Cite this page
APA
Apprised.news. (n.d.). 119 HR 273: REMAIN in Mexico Act of 2025. Retrieved 2026-05-13, from https://apprised.news/bill/119hr273
MLA
"119 HR 273: REMAIN in Mexico Act of 2025." Apprised.news. Web. 2026-05-13. <https://apprised.news/bill/119hr273>.
Chicago
"119 HR 273: REMAIN in Mexico Act of 2025." Apprised.news. Accessed 2026-05-13. https://apprised.news/bill/119hr273.
BibTeX
@misc{apprised_119_hr_273_remain_in_mexico_act_of_2025,
title = {119 HR 273: REMAIN in Mexico Act of 2025},
publisher = {Apprised.news},
url = {https://apprised.news/bill/119hr273},
note = {Accessed 2026-05-13}
}